+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Date post: 11-Aug-2015
Category:
Upload: aghajani
View: 29 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Presentation given on 3rd OpenCFD Workshop, Norwood, MA, USA
Popular Tags:
18
Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies SPRINKLER SPRAY MODELLING Hamed Aghajani Supervisors: Prof. Jennifer Wen and Dr. Siaka Dembele CFES, Kingston University, London 3 rd FM Global Open Source CFD Fire Modeling Workshop, Norwood MA May 9-10
Transcript
Page 1: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion StudiesCentre for Fire and Explosion Studies

SPRINKLER SPRAY MODELLING

Hamed Aghajani

Supervisors:Prof. Jennifer Wen and Dr. Siaka Dembele

CFES, Kingston University, London   

3rd FM Global Open Source CFD Fire Modeling Workshop, Norwood MA

May 9-10

Page 2: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Outline

β€’ Objectives

β€’ Modelling Approach

β€’ Preliminary studies and results

β€’ Conclusion

Page 3: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Objectives

Sheppard, D. T. Spray characteristics of fire sprinklers. PhD Dissertation, Evanston, IL: North-western University, 2002.

Studying Available Modeling Approaches for Sprinklers and Understand their Limitations

Develop a Model to Study Droplets Transport and Interaction with Fire

Page 4: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Modelling Approaches

β€’ Deterministic Atomization ModelInitial

Sprinkler Condition

Sheet Breakup

Droplet size, location, Velocity

Ligament Breakup

Marshall, A. W., and M. Di Marzo. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 82 (2004): 97–104.

Film Formation

Page 5: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Modelling Approaches

Film Formation

Sheet Breakup

𝜌𝐿h(πœ• π‘“πœ•π‘‘ )2

+πœ‡h𝑛2(πœ• π‘“πœ•π‘‘ )βˆ’ 2πœŒπœŽπ‘ˆ 2 βˆ’2πœŽπ‘›2=0 𝒇= 𝝆𝑼 𝟐 π’•βˆšπŸπ’‰π† π‘³πˆ

h𝑏𝑒=hπ‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘Ÿ 𝑏𝑒

π‘Ÿπ‘π‘’=π‘Ÿ 𝑑+π‘ˆ 𝑠h𝑒𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑏𝑒

𝑼 𝒔𝒉𝒆𝒆𝒕 π’•π’ƒπ’–πŸ‘ +𝒓 𝒅 𝒕𝒃𝒖

𝟐 βˆ’π’‰π’…π’“ 𝒅( 𝒇 βˆšπŸπ†π‘³πˆ

𝝆𝑼 π’”π’‰π’†π’†π’•πŸ )

𝟐

=𝟎

Sheet Tracking

h𝑑=𝐢2Γ—(𝜈𝐿

𝑄 )0 .25 π‘Ÿ 𝑑

94 +𝑙

94

π‘Ÿπ‘‘

h𝑑=π‘Ÿ0

2π‘Ÿ 𝑑

+𝐢1Γ—( 7𝜈𝐿

π‘ˆ 0)

0 .2

π‘Ÿπ‘‘0 . 8

Presently derived equation

Page 6: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Modelling Approaches

Ligament Formation

𝑉 𝑙𝑖𝑔=πœ‹π‘Ÿ 𝑙𝑖𝑔2 [2πœ‹ (π‘Ÿ 𝑏𝑒+π‘Ÿ 𝑙𝑖𝑔) ]

𝑉 𝑙𝑖𝑔=πœ‹ h𝑏𝑒[(π‘Ÿπ‘π‘’+ πœ†2 )2

βˆ’π‘Ÿ 𝑏𝑒2 ]

π…πŸ’π‘»

π’…π’π’Šπ’ˆπŸ‘ + 𝝅

πŸπ’‰π’ƒπ’–

𝒓 π’ƒπ’–π’…π’π’Šπ’ˆπŸ βˆ’[(𝒓 𝒃𝒖+

π€πŸ )

𝟐

βˆ’π’“π’ƒπ’–πŸ ]=𝟎

Drop Formation

π‘›π‘π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘‘ 𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑑𝑙𝑖𝑔=[ 12+ 3πœ‡

2βˆšπœŒπΏπœŽπ‘‘π‘™π‘–π‘”]βˆ’ 0 .5

43πœ‹π‘Ÿ π·π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘

3 =πœ‹ π‘Ÿ 𝑙𝑖𝑔2 πœ†π‘π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘‘π‘™π‘–π‘”

𝒅𝑫𝒓𝒐𝒑❑ =πŸ‘βˆš πŸ‘π…

π’π’„π’“π’Šπ’•π’π’Šπ’ˆ

π’…π’π’Šπ’ˆπŸ

Deterministic approach predicts a single droplet characteristic

Presently derived conservation equation

Page 7: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Modelling Approachesβ€’ Stochastic Modeling

Critical Breakup Amplitude (

Sheet Breakup Wavelength (

Ligament Breakup Wavelength (

Stochastic Model

Wu, Di, Delphine Guillemin, and Andre W Marshall. "A modeling basis for predicting the initial sprinkler spray." Fire Safety Journal 42 (2007): 283-294.

Droplet Size

Initial Location

Existing model is mainly for simple deflectors

Do not account for actual sprinkler configurations (Pendant, Upright)[There is no model for fluctuation intensity]

Normal distribution have been utilized for all 3 parameters.0.1 < I < 0.3

Page 8: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Ibrahim, E A., and McKinney, T R., Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers 220 (2006): 203-214.

Preliminary Studies and Results

Alternative Sheet Tracking Model

πœ•πœ•πœ‰ (𝜌 𝑓 𝑒𝑓 𝛿 )=0Mass

Momentum 𝜌 𝑓 𝑒𝑓

πœ•π‘’π‘“

πœ•πœ‰βˆ’πœŒ 𝑓 𝑒 𝑓𝑀 𝑓

sin πœƒπ‘Ÿ

=π‘†πœ‰+𝜌 𝑓 𝑔cosπœƒ

𝜌 𝑓 𝑒𝑓 𝑒𝑓

πœ•π‘’π‘“

πœ• πœ‰βˆ’πœŒ 𝑓𝑀 𝑓 𝑀 𝑓

cosπœƒπ‘Ÿ

=βˆ’πœ•π‘ 𝑓

πœ•πœ‚βˆ’πœŒ 𝑓 𝑔sin πœƒ

Geometryπ‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘‘ πœ‰

=sinπœƒ

π‘‘π‘§π‘‘πœ‰

=cosπœƒ

Page 9: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

 

Preliminary Studies and Results

Implementation thoroughly satisfies the original paper

Page 10: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Preliminary Studies and Results

Page 11: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

K=2

K=3

K=4

K=5

Preliminary Studies and Results

Wu, Di, Delphine Guillemin, and Andre W Marshall. "A modeling basis for predicting the initial sprinkler spray." Fire Safety Journal 42 (2007): 283-294.

Page 12: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

2/11min2.3

,25

psigalK

mmDdef

)3.0,1.0(

50,50,1000

randIII

pnm

dropligf

Preliminary Studies and Results

Ren, Ning. β€œAnalysis of the Initial Spray from Canonical Fire Suppression Nozzles”, Master Thesis, Maryland: University of Maryland, College Park, 2007.

Page 13: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Preliminary Studies and Results

Dundas, P., FMRC serial no. 18792 RC73-T-40

Page 14: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Preliminary Studies and Results

Normalized radial displacement Vs. Normalized Vertical displacement

AT 300K

P = 10 psi

P = 20 psi

P = 30 psi

P = 50 psi

P= 70 psi

Page 15: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Normalized Velocity Vs. Normalized Vertical displacement

AT 300K

Preliminary Studies and Results

P = 10 psi

P = 20 psi

P = 30 psi

P = 50 psi

P= 70 psi

Page 16: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Preliminary Studies and ResultsLiquid sheet deflection Vs. Normalized Vertical displacement

AT 300K

P = 10 psi

P = 20 psi

P = 30 psi

P = 50 psi

P= 70 psi

Page 17: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Formerly introduced atomization models implemented as a frame tool for further investigations and improvements

Verification of the model against published research has been conducted Normally distributed stochastic parameters droplet size predicts droplet sizes in

range of , which are in range of published experimental work.

FURTHUR STUDIES Effect of surrounding air on spray parameters Explore the effects of some physical sprinkler parameters as boss and tine/space. Studying the interaction of different spray pattern with fire

Conclusion and Future Work

Page 18: Sprinkler Spray Modelling

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies

Thank you.

Comments and Questions?


Recommended