SRA Presentation 2016

8/18/2019 SRA Presentation 2016

1/21

1 © 2014 KPMG Advisory Services Private Limited, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMGInternational”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

WELCOME


2/21


SLUM

REHABILITATION AUTHORITY


3/21


Since beginning of 20th century slums existed in

Mumbai e.g. Dharavi, Matunga labour camp, etc.

Pre & Post independence people from all corners of

country came in search of job.

Mumbai as the city of !mployment opportunity

Slum became the culture of Mumbai

Background


4/21


Approach

Approach – I (1950 – 1970)

" #pproach as to remove the slums and protect the land.

" %he nflux of migrant labor as so huge therefore the efforts to protect even private land

proved futile" 'arge #rea of public land encroached by slums

Approach – II (1970 – 1990)

" Since the removal and control of slum proved futile the humanitarian approach torecogni(e the slum as consider.

" %he Maharashtra Slum #rea )mprovement, *learance & +edevelopment #ct, -/- camein existence.

" *ensus of hutments carried out in -/ and dentity *ard1Photo passes issued to Slumamilies.

" 3asic amenities such as ater, drainage, toilet, pathays, street light ere provided inslum area.

" Slum 4p5gradation program as implemented ith 6orld 3an7 assistance in mid -80.

" Slum land given on lease of 90 yrs to the co5operative society of slum dellers at anominal lease rent.

" Soft loans for renovation of individual structures on as is here is basis as provided.

" +edevelopment of slum dellers as also initiated in Dharavi under PM:P.


5/21


Approach…

Approach – III (1991-1995)

" +edevelopment of slums started under S+D by ma7ing provision in #ct and +ules.

" 4nder D*+ ;o. 99 )-0 redevelopment of slum through oners1 developers 1co5operative housingsocieties of slum dellers1;:< as made permissible for censuses slum or slum deller hose nameappeared in the !lectoral +oll of -8= ith S upto 2.=.

" %he Scheme proved not effective.

Approach – IV (1995 Onward)

" ormation of AFZULPURKAR COI!!"" hich recommended Slum +ehabilitation scheme.

" *ommittee estimated 80> slum rehabilitation is possible in situ.

" *ommittee relies on philosophy that ?if ine@uality has to be removed there has to be une@ual laA asgiving free tenements to slum dellers is not supported by housing philosophy but slum dellersdeserve this preferential une@ual treatment to bring them into mainstream of social, cultural andeconomic fabric of this pulsating city.


6/21


Slums and hutments are integral part of Mumbai.

#ll have contributed to the industrial, economic and commercial groth of Mumbai#

Bouses in mumbai alays remain unaffordable since british time therefore slumgroth.

%o enhance their standard of living, an authori(ed delling unit is a first step in theright direction

Fact Fndng O! Co""tt##


7/21


For"aton o!

S$u" R#ha%$taton Authort&

'o(#rn"#nt $aunch#d co"pr#h#n)(#

S$u" R#ha%$taton Sch#"# n *#c#"%#r +,,-

4sing land as resource Slum tenements are provided to slum

dellers at C!+< *ost

%o cross subsidi(e the cost of Slum

+ehabilitation tenements, the incentive

S is given for construction of sale

tenements

%enements constructed in sale

component are alloed to be sold in

open mar7et

For$a%&on o' *$

R+ha,&&%a%&on A*%hor&%

&n .+c+$,+r 1995


8/21


Cha$$#ng#) a) on +,,-

%otal 8 'acs of amilies staying in slum.

Population staying in slum is about 0 'acs.

+ehabilitation of the above population as early as possible.


9/21


I"p$#"#ntaton o! Sch#"#

. /roc#))

%he Slum dellers co5operative society ?selectA developer to implement the scheme

!ligibility of Slum DellerE Must be slum deller as on -.-.2000 earlier it as -.-.-=

Such developer shall have /0> consent of !ligible Slum dellers family

%he Project submitted by such developer ith /0> consent is admitted by S+#

%he proposal is scrutini(ed and if in order is accepted for further process

%he scheme is implemented in to part +ehab and Sale *omponent

%he Developer is alloed to construct sale component to meet his expenditure & profit

%he !ligible slum dellers get 2=.00 s@. mtr. tenement free of cost

%he ;on5!ligible slum dellers are removed from the land


10/21


1# In /&%* r+ha, /ch+$+ Und+r Pro&/&on o' .#C#R 22(10)

• +ehabilitation is done at site of slums.

3# PAP %+n+$+n% /ch+$+ Und+r pro&/&on/ o' .#C#R 22(10) ca*/+ 2#11

• %his scheme is meant for slum dellers hose rehabilitationis not possible in5situ due to physical constraints li7e vital

projects, footpaths, hilloc7s, etc.

2# P+r$an+n% !ran/&% !+n+$+n% ch+$+ Und+r pro&/&on/ o'.#C#R 22(14).

• Permanent %ransit %enement are constructed in situ by givingincentive S

S$u" R#ha%$taton Sch#"#)

. T&p#)


11/21



. F#atur#)

;o financial burden on :overnment.

Slum dellers get a self contained 2= s@. mtr. i.e. 2 s@. ft. )earlier

22= s@. ft carpet area tenement free of cost consisting of living room,7itchen1alcove, bed room, bath & 6*.

4nderlying land is the resource for the scheme

*ost of construction of the rehabilitation tenements is cross5

subsidi(ed from the sale of free sale tenements in the open mar7et. %he entity developing the slum rehabilitation scheme is entitled to

free sale component in proportion to the rehab component.

S upto 9 can be consumed for tenement density of =00 to =0

tenements per hector in situ , as against -.99 1 -.00 S available forgeneral sites.

S upto can be consumed for tenement density of more than =0

tenements per hector in situ ith prior :ovt. approval , as against

-.99 1 -.00 S available for general sites.


12/21



. F#atur#)

!very slum structure existing as on -1-12000 or prior thereto is eligible

/0> of the eligible slum dellers in a slum can come together to form a

society for implementation of slum rehabilitation scheme.

+ehab tenement allotted to a slum deller cannot be sold for a period of -0

years from the date of allotment. Boever it can be transferred to a legal heir

ith prior permission of *!< )S+#

# sum of +s. 20,00015 per tenement is recovered as maintenance deposit

from the developer for subsidi(ing the monthly maintenance of the rehabbuilding

or every -.0 [email protected]. of rehab component construction, sale built up area

alloed is

0#75 /#$%#

C&% .hara&*,*r,/

1#0 /#$%#

1#22 /#$%#R+ha,

1#0 /#$%#

a6# FI con/*$p%&on aow+d on po% &/ 2


13/21



. Statu) At a '$anc#

Particular 33(10) 3.11 33(14)D Total

No of S.R. schemesanctioned LOI Issued 1,233 51 120 1,404

No of tenement proposedto be constructed

3,36,725 1,26,343 8,569 4,71,637

No of tenement approved 2,20,351 1,24,704 8,213 3,53,268

No of tenement underconstruction 1,39,619 81,089 5,860 2,26,568

No of Tenements OCCgranted

85,159 75,225 1,992 1,62,366


14/21



. O%0#ct(#)

8 'acs families ere targeted for rehabilitation

Protection of slum deller existed as on -1-12000

+ehabilitation of protected slum dellers in permanent

tenement

+ehab %enement free of cost

4pgrading standard of living and eradicating slums

;o inancial burden on :overnment

!mpoering the slum dellers


15/21



. Statu) agan)t S#t O%0#ct(#)

#pproximate -2 'acs families living in slum as against 8

'acs targeted

9,29 slum cluster ere identified

-.=8 'acs tenements constructed so far

-,2=,0/ tenements ere occupied

*onstructions of 9 'acs tenements are in pipeline

+s. =89 *rs revenue generated for M*:M & MB#D#


16/21



. Bott$#n#ck) n ach#(ng O%0#ct(#)

*$ .w++r/ R+a%+d &//*+/

'and onerFs are neither submitting scheme nor giving consent

for the scheme

%o obtain /0> consent from slum dellers

%o deal ith non consented slum dellers

%o deal ith consented but non5co5operative slum dellers

!viction of large nos. of non eligible slum dellers )99198

.++op+r R+a%+d I//*+/

;on5performing developer )partnerFs dispute

Problem in raising of finance


17/21



. Bott$#n#ck) n ach#(ng O%0#ct(#)

Po&c R+a%+d &//*+/

*+C #rea

; ;o policies for *entral :ovt. 'and

S.+. Scheme in difficult area )hilly area

Scheme on +:1P: )DP +eservation

*ommercial unit having more area are eligible only up to 22= s@. ft. irrespective

of their more area & planning constraints

;on5availability of ade@uate transit camps or alternate accommodations

Garious departmental competent authorities


18/21



. Wa& For1ard

Policy regarding slum on Land own+d , C+n%ra o%.

Slum area is to be considered as a residence (one in ne proposed

DP. :ranting Inc+n%&+ FI for construction of affordable housing

:iving time period to submit schemes or +/+ %+nd+r

3rea7ing eligibility and consents 1 consent through /+cr+% ,ao%

%on planning Schemes 6holesome I ,a/+d /*r+ of entire city for the identification of

eligible slum dellers

%o address issues of ;on5!ligible slum deller E ;eeds a Policy for

8,r&d /ch+$+

Pro-ac%&+ d++op$+n% rather than reactive responses

Declaring slum li7e places at on+ o


19/21



. Wa& For1ard

Ad$&n&/%ra%&+ r+'or$/ 'or ,+%%+r acco*n%a,&&% and %ar+%

a//&n&n

Proc+// %o ,+ /&$p&'&+d

or identification of !ligible slum dellers

or !viction of non co5operative slum dellers H


20/21



. Wa& For1ard

+o+rnanc+ In&%&a%&+/

Development of Slum MS )by conducting 3iometric Survey of

each hutment and seamless ntegration ith :S 3ase Map

*reating +ehabilitation Database and conducting biometric

survey of existing beneficiaries of S+# Schemes.

*ustomi(ed application for S+# office 5 or end to end

computeri(ation of S+# or7flo

#utomation of building plan approval as per D*+ and


21/21

21Thank You

Date post:	06-Jul-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	romiloza
View:	216 times
Download:	0 times

SRA Presentation 2016

Documents