Date post: | 14-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | mari-muthu |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 1/14
SRI RAMAKRISHNA ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Baja SAEINDIA 2012
Design Report
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 2/14
BAJA SAEINDIA 2012 Design Report
Team registration ID: 57991
Author: R. Raamprashaath
Author email ID: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
This event aims at challenging the
budding engineers and makes them face
real time challenges in designing and
fabricating BAJA vehicle. Our vehicle
serves its purpose by compiling with all
rules set by the BAJA SAEINDIA.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
OVERALL DIMENSIONS & WEIGHT
Overall length 2050 mm
Overall height 1535 mm
Overall width 1603 mm
Track width (front)
(rear)
1400 mm
1400 mm
Wheel base 1476.5 mm
Ground clearance 254mm
Kerb weight 350 Kg
ROLL CAGE
Material ASTM A106 B
Construction Tubular
Type of weld GTAW (TIG)
Number of welds 62
Co-author: B.Prasanth
ENGINE
TypeFour stroke petrol
engine
Model Briggs & Stratton
Displacement 305 cc
Maximum
power10 HP @ 4000 rpm
Maximum
torque18.65 Nm @ 2600 rpm
Mounting Rear transverse
TRANSMISSION
Type Rear wheel drive
Gear boxConstant mesh (4
forward + 1 reverse)
Model Mahindra Alpha
Gear & gear
ratio
I 31.45
II 18.7
III 11.4
IV 7.35R 55.08
SUSPENSION
Front Parallel unequal
wishbones
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 3/14
RearParallel unequal
wishbones
Shock absorbersMonotube inverted gas
shocks
Travel 100 mm
STEERING
TypeVariable rack and
pinion
Model Maruti 800
Steering ratio 14:1 to 20:1
Turning radius 4 m
Lock to lock
turns3
BRAKES
Front Disc brakes
(200 mm)
RearDisc brakes
(200 mm)
Braking distance 10 m
Bias 70:30
PERFORMANCE
Acceleration 0.55 m/s2
Grade ability 26.430
Maximum speed 41.25 kmph
SAFETY
Centre of gravity 488 mm
Static stabilityfactor
1.51
Roll over
probability15 %
3D VIEW
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 4/14
ROLL CAGE DESIGN
The objective of the roll cage is to
accommodate the driver and other
components of vehicle and protect them
under collisions. The overall roll cagegeometry is guided by strict rules which
are constantly referred to ensure rule
book compliance and the driver safety is
given top priority.
The initial design was made using
the guidelines given in rulebook. A PVC
prototype was made to ensure the space
proficiency. This design is developed
considering the aesthetics and safety. Thisstructure is then modified to make it easy
to manufacture. The entire design was
done using Pro/E software.
MATERIAL SELECTION
This PVC model is further developed into
a structure with the help of finite element
analysis.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Material ASTM A 106 B
Yield strength 463.77 N/mm2
Ultimate strength 552.43 N/mm2
Young’s modulus 205 GPa
Outer diameter 33.4 mm
Wall thickness 3.38 mm
Welding preferred TIG
MATERI AL
TENSILE
STRENGTH
(N/mm2)
COST/
m(Rs.)
WELDA
BILITY (Scale 5)
AVAILA
BILITY (Scale
5)
AISI 1018 370.2 600 5 4
AISI 4130 448.8 2200 1 1
IS 1239 407.45 765 4 5
ASTM
A106 B
463.7 273 4 5
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 5/14
ANALYSIS
The roll cage designed is finite
element analyzed using ANSYS software
and features are added suitably to
strengthen the structure.
TEST LOADRESULTS
STRESS F.S
Front impact
22540 N 221.336 2.03
Rearimpact
22540 N 205.49 2.19
Sideimpact
11500 N 219.347 2.05
Roll over
test 9000 N 211.462 2.13
Heave test 4500 N 159.07 2.83
Front
bump test 5250 N 75.53 5.95
Rear
bump test 5250 N 95.599 4.7
FRONTAL IMPACT TEST
The dynamic energy of the masses under
impact is given by
E = 0.5 * {m1m2/m1+m2} * (u2-u1)2
The impact force is given by
F = E/t
Where t is the impact time; t = 1s
Mass of vehicle = 460 kg
Relative velocity = 50 kmph
F = ¼ * 460 *142 * 1/1 = 22540 N
The above determined load is applied on
the frontal area of roll cage and the
stresses and deflection values are found
satisfactory.
REAR IMPACT TEST
The impact force to be applied is given by
F = ¼ * 460 * 142 * 1/1 = 22540 N
This load is applied on the roll cage and
the stress values and deflection are found
satisfactory.
SIDE IMPACT TEST
The impact force to be applied is given by
F = ¼ * 460 * 102 * 1/1 = 11500 N
This load is applied on the roll cage and
the stress values and deflection are found
satisfactory.
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 6/14
ROLL OVER TEST
This test is performed to analyze
the structure under rollover impact
conditions. The vehicle is pretended to
roll and the load is applied on the top
members of structure.
The impact force is given by
F = 2 * 460 * 9.81 = 9000 N
HEAVE TESTThis test is performed to strength
of the base of vehicle. The static force
applied is given by
F= 460 * 9.81 = 4600 N
BUMP TEST
This test is conducted to check the
structure when the vehicle lands on a
single wheel after a bump. The impact
force for both front and rear bump test is
given by
F = ½ * 460 * 9.81 *2.32 = 5250 N
FRONT BUMP TEST
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 7/14
REAR BUMP TEST
MANUFACTURING METHODOLOGY
The joints that are to be welded
are edge prepared prior to welding
process. The profile on the edges is drawn
using TUBEMITER software. The cut
tubes are held by clamps on a firm base
and are welded in order to ensure
accuracy. The welded regions are
immediately covered with sand to
prevent air cooling of the welds. This
decreases the internal stresses that would
result due to welding.
SUSPENSION DESIGN
The suspension gives the driver
the comfort and isolates the components
from shocks that arise due to road
conditions. The suspension used is
parallel unequal double wishbones (both
front and rear) as this could perform
better than many other types. The
suspension is set to perform well in the
off-road conditions.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Material ASTM A 106 B
Yield strength 288.81 N/mm2
Ultimate strength 428.56 N/mm2
Youngs modulus 205 GPa
Outer diameter 26.7 mm
Wall thickness 2.87 mm
Welding preferred TIG
The initial design of the arms is
then modified to have to have no bends to
increase its strength. The arms are finite
element analyzed using ANSYS software.Initial design
This design is analyzed usingANSYS and found that it doesn’t possess
adequate strength during impact. Hence a
new model is developed and analyzed
using ANSYS.
FINAL DESIGN
Lower
arm
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 8/14
ANALYSIS
Weight of vehicle including driver
= 460 kg = 4512.6 N
Number of arms = 4*2 = 8
Assuming equal forces on each arm, static
upward force on each arm is
F = 4512.6/8 = 564.075 N
The dynamic load on each arm is
Fd = 2*564.075 = 1128.15 N
Hence it is taken as 1200 N. Also
due to rolling motion and friction, there is
a load in the direction of motion which isestimated as 0.3 times the normal load.
Fr = 0.3*1200 = 360 N
These loads are applied on the end
of arm and stress values are found out.
ARM CONDITION STRESS F.S
Upper
All DOF = 0 at
mountingpoints;
Fd, Fr at rod end
136.874N/mm2
2.11
Lower
All DOF = 0 at
mounting
points;
Fd, Fr at rod end
139.352
N/mm2 2.08
MANUFACTURING METHODOLOGY
The A arms are TIG welded with
the help of fixtures and holding
equipment. The welded regions are
immediately covered with sand to
Upper
arm
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 9/14
prevent air cooling of the welds. This
decreases the internal stresses that would
result due to welding.
SHOCK ABSORBER
The shock absorber absorbs the
impact loads that act on the vehicle. The
shocks that are light with considerable
travel are chosen for the purpose.
The custom made shocks don’t suit
the purpose as it has lower elasticity than
that of automobile springs. Hence
readymade springs are used in the
shocks. They are mono tube inverted gasfilled shocks.
STEERING
The steering system gets the
vehicle into the desired direction. The
steering system used must avoid over
steer and must be rugged to perform in
off-road conditions.
TYPEWEI
GHT
EASE
OF
MOUNTING
COSTSENSITI
VITY
Variablerack and
pinion
Less High Less Medium
Recircula
ting ball
type
High Low HighVery
high
Central
rollerand rack Less
Mediu
m
Mediu
m High
The steering chosen is variable
rack and pinion as it suits the purpose
better and is easily available.
STEERING CALCULATIONS
The steering geometry and
mounting points are given in Susprog 3D
and the lock angles are found out.
Inside lock angle, ϴ = 18.230
Outside lock angle, φ = 26.840
Rear wheel track, a = 1400 mm
Wheel base, b = 1476.5 mm
Distance between pivot centers, c = 1120
mm
Turning radius of inside front wheel
= (b/sin φ) + (a-c)/c = 3300 mm
Turning radius of outside front wheel
= (b/sin ϴ) + (a-c)/c = 4700 mm
Steering ratio = 14:1 to 20:1
Lock to lock turns = 3
Overall turning radius = 4 m
The manual variable rack and pinion
steering of Maruti 800 is used in our
vehicle.
BRAKES
The disc brake of TVS Apache is
chosen for all wheels. The discs are light
in weight and provide a good brakingperformance. The master cylinder of
Maruti 800 is used to provide the
necessary braking force to all discs.
Discs used: 200 mm discs
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 10/14
BRAKING CALCULATIONS
Maximum speed of vehicle,
V = 41.25 kmph = 11.46 m/s
Target braking distance = 10 m
Weight of vehicle = 460 kg = 4512.6 N
Kinetic Energy = mv2/2 = 30206.27 Nm
Braking force needed=KE/10 = 3020.63 N
Deceleration, d = Fb/mg = 6.57 m/s2
Weight distribution F:R = 40:60
Front axle dynamic load
= W1+(d*W*h)/(g*L)
Rear axle dynamic load
= W1- (d*W*h)/(g*L)
Where W1 = static weight on front axle
W2 = static weight on rear axle
W = total weight of vehicle
D = deceleration of vehicle
L = length of wheel base
Front axle dynamic load = 2712.03 N
Rear axle dynamic load = 1800.5 N
Brake biasing F:R 60:40
Braking torque T=µRPA*2n
µ - coefficient of friction
R -effective radius of discs
P –pressure applied by TMC
A-area of caliper of disc brakes
n- number of disc pads
The braking torque is found to be
sufficient to lock the wheels. The braking
circuit is diagonal split (X type) to reduce
the chances of skidding.
Stopping time, t = v/d =11.46/6.57=1.75 s
Stopping distance, S= *t – 0.5*d*t 2 = 10 m
POWER TRAIN DESIGN
The real wheel drive is used in our
vehicle as it could provide the balance
and avoid torque steer. The transmission
system used must suit the transverse
orientation of the engine. The
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 11/14
transmission system of Mahindra Alfa is
chosen for the purpose. The gearbox used
is 4 speed manual constant mesh gearbox
with 1 reverse. The gear ratios are
Gear I - 31.45:1
Gear II – 18.7:1
Gear III – 11.4:1
Gear IV – 7.35:1
Reverse – 55.08:1
Transmission efficiency = 0.8
PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
ACCELERATION
(Power available to acceleration) = (brakepower * transmission efficiency) – (power
required to overcome total road & air
resistance at max speed & top gear)
(We*V*a)/(1000*G) = (P * 0.8) – (Rr +Ra)V
We – equivalent weight of vehicle
V – Velocity of vehicle
a – Acceleration of vehicle
G – Gear ratio
P - Brake power
Rr – Rolling resistance
Ra – air resistance
We = W = (If * 0.8 * G2 + Is)/r2
If = 1.265 Nm2; Is = 3.12 Nm2;
G = 7.35; r = 0.2794 m
We = 5252.9 N
Hence
(5252.9*a*11.46)/1000*7.35=6.6*0.8 –
0.775
Therefore acceleration, a = 0.55 m/s2
Time to reach 0 to maximum speed
(41.25 kmph) is 20.84 s.
MAXIMUM SPEED
V = {(N*r)/(2.65*G)} * transmissionefficiency
Where N is engine rpm
r is wheel radius in m
G is gear ratio
Maximum speed = 41.25 kmph @ 2800
rpm
TRACTIVE EFFORT
Tf = 3603 * 0.8 * Pe/V
ROLLING RESISTANCE
Rr = (a+bV) W
a = 0.015; b = 0.0016
AIR RESISTANCE
Ra = k a * A * V2
k a = 0.045; A= 0.15125 m2
GRADE RESISTANCE
Rg = Tf – Rr – Ra
GRADE
ϴ = sin-1 (Rg/W)
Using the above stated formula the
maximum grad ability of our vehicle is
26.430.
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 12/14
WHEELS AND TYRES
The tires must suit the off-road
conditions. Hence ATV tires are chosen.
Specifications 22” x 11” x 8”
The four plied tires provide good
durability. The tread width, side wall
width, load handling capacity of the tires
provides greater advantages with
considerable less weight.
BODY PANELS
The rear roll hoop (RRH) and the
base members are supported with the MS
sheets. The side panels are covered with
the polycarbonate sheets to decrease the
weight of the vehicle and improve
aesthetics. These sheets provide goodvisual effects and ease the painting works.
DRIVERS ERGONOMICS
The driver is provided a good room for
his works. The driver cabin is designed to
accommodate the largest member of our
team with adequate clearance from walls.
The racing seats with racks are purchased
which provides the driver good comfort
even during action.
SAFETY EQUIPMENTS
The vehicle is equipped with a
temperature sensory circuit which stops
the engine during any fire accidents. This
system automatically actuates kill switchif the local temperature increases beyond
a certain limit which may lead to fire.
The temperature sensors and
thermocouples attached at various points
on vehicle constantly measure the local
temperature. If the temperature exceeds
the predefined value the sensor actuates
the kill switch and stops the engine. This
prevents the further fire accidents.
Temperature
sensor
µ Controller
Kill switchEngine
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 13/14
HORN CIRCUIT
The following block diagram gives
the horn circuit being installed in our
vehicle.
LIGHTING CIRCUIT
The following diagram gives the
lighting circuit which includes a reverse
light being installed in our vehicle.
ENGINEERING BILL OF MATERIALS
PART/SYSTEM SUB-SYSTEM
Engine
Fuel tank
Air filterExhaust
TransmissionGearbox
Clutch
Drive TrainHalf Shaft
Hub
Steering
Rack and pinion
Steering column
Steering wheel
SuspensionA-Arms
Shock absorbers
FrameASTM A106 B tubes
MS sheet
BodyLexon
polycarbonate
Brakes
Discs
Caliper
TMC
Brake lines
Safety Equipment Temperature sensorFire extinguisher
Electrical
Equipment
Lights (brake &
reverse)
Horn
Kill switch
WheelsRims
Tires
ClampsFasteners
Bushes
Miscellaneous Accessories
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Team phoenix would like to express sincere
gratitude to the following persons for their
guidance and support.
Mr.C.Natarajan, Faculty advisor
Dr.P.Karuppuswamy, HOD
Dr.R.Radhakrishnan, Principal
BAJA SAEINDIA selection committee
7/27/2019 SREC
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srec 14/14
REFERENCES
BAJA SAEINDIA Rule book 2012
“Design of Machine Elements” by R.S.Khurmi
& J.K.Gupta
“Automobile Engineering” by Dr.Kirpal Singh
“Race car vehicle dynamics” by Milliken
“Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics” by
Thomas D Gillespie
“Tune to win” by Carroll Smith