+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I: Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I: Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Date post: 30-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: merton
View: 24 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Charles Stafford. Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I: Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion. Capri Spring School on Transport in Nanostructures, March 29, 2007. Acknowledgements. Students: Chang-hua Zhang (Ph.D. 2004) Dennis Conner (M.S. 2006) Nate Riordan Postdoc: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
22
Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I: Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion Capri Spring School on Transport in Nanostructures, March 29, 2007 Charles Stafford
Transcript
Page 1: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I: Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Capri Spring School on Transport in Nanostructures, March 29, 2007

Charles Stafford

Page 2: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Acknowledgements

Students:Chang-hua Zhang (Ph.D. 2004) Dennis Conner (M.S. 2006)Nate Riordan

Postdoc: Jérôme Bürki

Coauthors:Dionys Baeriswyl, Ray Goldstein, Hermann Grabert, Frank Kassubek, Dan Stein, Daniel Urban

Funding:NSF Grant Nos. DMR0072703 and DMR0312028; Research Corp.

Page 3: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

1. How thin can a metal wire be?

Page 4: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Surface-tension driven instability

T. R. Powers and R. E. Goldstein, PRL 78, 2555 (1997)

Cannot be overcome in classical MD simulations!

Page 5: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Fabrication of a gold nanowire using an electron microscope

Courtesy of K. Takayanagi, Tokyo Institute of Technology

Page 6: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

QuickTime™ and a YUV420 codec decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Courtesy of K. Takayanagi, Tokyo Institute of Technology

Extrusion of a gold nanowire using an STM

Page 7: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

What is holding the wires together? A mechanical analogue of conductance quantization?

Page 8: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Is electron-shell structure the key to understanding stable contact geometries?

A. I. Yanson, I. K. Yanson & J. M. van Ruitenbeek, Nature 400, 144 (1999);PRL 84, 5832 (2000); PRL 87, 216805 (2001)

Corrected Sharvin conductance:

T=90K

Conductance histograms of sodium nanocontacts

Page 9: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

2. Nanoscale Free-Electron Model (NFEM)

• Model nanowire as a free-electron gas confined by hard walls.

• Ionic background = incompressible fluid.

• Most appropriate for s-electrons in monovalent metals.

• Regime:

• Metal nanowire = 3D open quantum billiard.

Page 10: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Scattering theory of conduction and cohesion

Electrical conductance (Landauer formula)

Grand canonical potential (independent electrons)

Electronic density of states (Wigner delay)

Page 11: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Quantum suppression of Shot noise

NFEM w/disorder

Gold nanocontacts

Page 12: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Multivalent atoms

Page 13: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Adiabatic + WKB approximations

Schrödinger equation decouples:

WKB scattering matrix for each 1D channel:

,

Page 14: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Comparison: NFEM vs. experiment

Exp:Theory:

Page 15: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Weyl expansion + Strutinsky theorem

Mean-field theory:

Weyl expansion:

Page 16: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Electron-shell potential

→ 2D shell structure favors certain “magic radii”

Classical periodic orbitsin a slice of the wire

Page 17: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

NFEM vs. self-consistent Jellium calculation

Page 18: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Different constraints possible in NFEM

# of atoms

Physical properties (e.g., tensile force) depend only on energy differences:

Page 19: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Example of the Strutinsky theorem: self-consistentHartree approximation

Page 20: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Special case: the constant-interaction model

Last term is important!

Page 21: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

Semiclassical power counting

Planck’s constant:

→ Surface energy dominates shell correction?!

Page 22: Stability and Symmetry Breaking in Metal Nanowires I:   Toward a Theory of Metallic Nanocohesion

3. Conclusions to Lecture 1

Nanoscale Free Electron Model is able to describe quantumtransport and metallic nanocohesion on an equal footing,explaining observed correlations in force and conductance ofmetal nanocontacts.

Total energy calculations apparently not sufficient to addressnanowire stability.

What more is needed? See Lecture 2!


Recommended