134
Report No: Meeting Date:
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District
STAFF REPORT TO: Finance and Audit Committee
AC Transit Board of Directors
FROM: David J. Armijo, General Manager
SUBJECT: Proposed FY 2015-16 Budgeting Framework
BRIEFING ITEM
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
15-033 January 28, 2015
Consider receiving an overview on Staff's proposed FY 2015-16 budgeting framework
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Board adopted a budget development calendar on November 12, 2014. Staff is now
proposing the next steps in the development process. The FY 2015-16 Operating and Capital
Budgets will be guided by prioritized goals and objectives, key performance indicators, and
major program targets. These strategies are derived from the development of the Short Range
Transit Plan (SRTP), which is the District's long-term vision for service, equipment, and facility
priorities.
Over the next weeks and months, staff will work with all department managers and employees
to generate systemic commitment and engagement in the definition of departmental goals, key
performance indicators, and specific targets to be achieved during the budget period. These
elements will be presented to the Board as the budget cycle progresses.
BUDGETARY/FISCAL IMPACT
There is no budgetary/fiscal impact associated with this report.
BACKGROUND/RATIONALE:
This staff report provides the Board with an update on the process for development of the FY
2015-16 Operating and Capital Budgets. The Board adopted a budget development calendar on
November 12, 2014. As presented in the calendar, the Board is receiving for consideration of
adoption a Mid-Year budget for both Operating and Capital activity for the current FY 2014-15
on January 28, 2015. The mid-year budget discussion represents a baseline for the current state
135
Report No. 15-033 Page 2 of 2
of operating performance versus operating costs, and the evolution of revenue trends. Staff is
now proposing the next steps in the development process.
ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES:
This report does not recommend a course of action with notable advantages or disadvantages.
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS:
This report is being provided to inform the Board of the activities associated with the
development of the FY 2015-16 Operating and Capital Budgets.
PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTIONS/POLICIES:
SR 14-283 Budget Development Process and Calendar, November 2014
ATTACHMENTS: 1: Overview of Proposed Budgeting Framework
Department Head Approval:
Reviewed by: Prepared by:
James D. Pachan, Interim Chief Financial Officer
Denise C. Standridge, Interim General Counsel Hernan Vargas, Budget Manager
FY 2015-16 Budget Development Process – An Overview of the Proposed
Budgeting Framework Presented by Jim Pachan, Interim Chief Financial Officer, and Hernan Vargas, Budget Manager
AC Transit Finance Department January 28, 2015
136
Agenda
Introduction
Overview of the Proposed Budgeting Framework
Refresher: the Framework for the SRTP Process
The Proposed FY 2015-16 Budgeting Framework: Steps
One Example
Conclusions and Q & A
137
Introduction
• Budget Board Policy 312 mandates District Staff to produce a budget based on long-term and short-term Goals, Objectives, KPIs and targets linking the SRTP’s strategies with the current year operating and capital budgets
• The budget developed plan accomplishes this mandate
in compliance with GFOA recommendations
• The following is an overview of the proposed budgeting, planning and budgetary control processes for FY2016
138
Overview: the proposed performance-based budget development process framework
SRTP Review
Set
Strategic Priorities
For new FY
Finalize Recommend
Budget
Review Goals,
Objectives KPIs
Targets For new
FY
Set specific Department
Objectives KPIs
Targets
Develop Proposed
Budget
-Verify Key Long term assumptions and status of long-term critical programs
-Define focus area at the District-level
-Roll down to department level with a focus on interdepartmental collaboration and common purpose
-Specify focus Goal(s) according to strategic priority
-Work on planning activities and resources (details in next slide)
-Define a final Recommended Budget repeating previous steps
Note: Process assumes implementation of individual performance evaluation 139
Refresher: The Framework for the SRTP Process
Board Policies
Performance Management – SMART Goals
FY 2014-15 Operating Budget
FY 2014-15 Capital Plan
MTC
AC Transit FY 2015-16 Operating
and Capital Budget
FTA
COA, BRT, CBTP, RTCI, TSP
FY 2015-16 / FY 2025-26 AC Transit
SRTP
140
The FY 2015-16 Proposed Budgeting Framework: Steps
1.- Define the strategic priorities for the FY
2015-16 year
2.- Pick the Goals that will guide us based on the strategic priorities
for the FY 2015-16 year
3.- Pick the Objectives for each of those Goals
selected for the FY 2015-16 year, and
define one KPI and one Target for the year for
each
4.- Create programs, projects or initiatives
that cross departmental
boundaries to achieve set targets for the FY 2015-16, and
assign a budget for those
Performance Budgeting
141
One example
A totally made up example First Step – Define Strategic Priorities
Increase ridership by a level enough to increase Farebox Recovery Ratio by 1 percentage point, at least, by the end of
FY 2015-16, OR Increase total service available by new Enhanced Service strategy, improving OTP by 3 percentage points and reducing total service costs per hour by 1 percent by the end of FY 2015-16
Second Step – Pick Goals
Goal 1: Provide quality and reliable service, OR Goal 2: Implement and maintain a strong safety culture, OR Goal 3: Utilize financial resources effectively and efficiently
142
Conclusions
The suggested Process, based on Best Practices, can assist the District to:
Design cross-departmental programs or initiatives that
contribute to achieving results with limited resources Fosters collaboration and systemic unified planning and
implementation – so everyone can win Picking priorities for action is based on hard data Helps discover positive feedback loops or interactions
between many Objectives and Goals
143