+ All Categories

Stan

Date post: 30-Oct-2014
Category:
Upload: guestef9823
View: 360 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
Popular Tags:
26
Adviser: Dr. Meng-Jang Lin Presenter: Stan Chung Date: January 7, 2010 1
Transcript
Page 1: Stan

Adviser: Dr. Meng-Jang LinPresenter: Stan ChungDate: January 7, 2010

1

Page 2: Stan

2

I. Introduction

II. Literature Review

III. Methodology

Page 3: Stan

3

I. Research Background

III. Research Purpose

II. Statement of problemII. Statement of problem

Page 4: Stan

Word-of-mouth has been approved by many researchers that it has huge effect on consumer’s purchasing behavior.

(Buttle, 1998; East, Hammond, & Lomax, 2008; Godes & Mayzlin, 2004)

4

Page 5: Stan

Word-of-Mouse

5

Word-of-Mouse

Word-of-Mouth

=Internet

+

Page 6: Stan

There were many researches focused on either word-of-mouse or consumer involvement.

However, few researches considered consumer involvement as an intervening variable of word-of-mouse.

6

Page 7: Stan

to explore the influence of word-of-mouse and consumer involvement on consumer purchase behavior

7

Page 8: Stan

8

I. Word-of-mouse

III. Consumer information seeking

III. Involvement

II. Trust

Page 9: Stan

Consumer information seeking behavior

9

Attempting to purchase

Perceiving risk, anxious

Minimizing the risk

Seeking information

(Srinivasan & Ratchford, 1991)

Page 10: Stan

Word-of-Mouse

10

Direct to multiple individuals

Direct to multiple individuals

No time & geographic restriction

No time & geographic restriction

AnonymityAnonymity

CharacteristicsCharacteristics

(Hennig-Thurau, Gwinner, Walsh & Gremler, 2004)

Page 11: Stan

The need for trust only arises in a risky situation.

(Mayer et al., 1995)11

AnonymityAnonymity

Trustworthiness?Trustworthiness?

Page 12: Stan

Definition of TrustSocial psychologists define trust as an expectation about the behaviour of others in transactions.

(Lewicki & Bunker, 1995)

12

Page 13: Stan

Trust

13

Expertness

Trustworthiness

Attractiveness

the extent to which a communicator is perceived to bea source of valid assertions

refers to the honesty and believability of a communicator.

includes a number of characteristics of a communicator might have(e.g. intellectual skills, personality properties, lifestyles)

(Erdogan, 1999)

Page 14: Stan

Definition of InvolvementA person’s perceived relevance of the object based on inherent needs, values, and interest.

(Zaichkowsky, 1986)

14

Page 15: Stan

Involvement

15

Behavioral Dimension High-Involvement View Low-Involvement View

Information SeekingConsumers actively seek product and brand information

Consumers seek limited product and brand information

Attitude Change Attitude change is difficult and rare

Attitude change is frequent but short

(Robertson et al., 1984)

Page 16: Stan

16

II. Research Structure

III. Participant

IV. Instrument

V. Data AnalysisV. Data Analysis

I. Research ProcedureI. Research Procedure

Page 17: Stan

Research Procedure

17

Questionnaire designQuestionnaire design

Data collectionData collection

Questionnaire revisionQuestionnaire revision

Data analysisData analysis

Pilot studyPilot study

Page 18: Stan

Research Procedure

18

Word-of-mouth Purchase Behavior

Involvement

Page 19: Stan

Participants

19

Tourists in Gugam

Time 15 minutes

Quantity30 (pre-test)

300 (formal study)

Age 18-65

Page 20: Stan

Instrument

20

Questionnaire (31 items)

5 points Likert scale

Part 1 (13)

Word-of-mouse (Ohanian, 1990; Swartz, 1984; Wu, 2009)

Part 2(10)

Consumer Involvement (Mcquarrie & Munson, 1992; Lee, 2006)

Part 3(8)

Consumer purchase behavior (Swinyard, 1993)

Part 4 Personal information

1 strongly disagree

5 strongly agree

Page 21: Stan

Part 1. Word-of-mouse

21

Expertness

Trustworthiness

Attractiveness

Page 22: Stan

22

Part 3. Consumer involvement

Page 23: Stan

Part 3. Consumer purchase behavior

23

Page 24: Stan

Part 4. Personal information

24

Page 25: Stan

25

SPSS 13.0 for windows

Descriptive statistics analysis

To know the distribution of participants personal information

Pearson Correlation To examine the relationships between the variables (can not test cause and effect)

Regression Analysis To examine the causal effect between variables

Page 26: Stan

26


Recommended