+ All Categories
Home > Documents > STAR 2010

STAR 2010

Date post: 05-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: teagan
View: 30 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
STAR 2010. September 10, 2010. Agenda. New in 2010 Interpreting reports Comparing results Appendixes A-G. California Modified Assessment (CMA) reports Scale score, performance levels for Grades 6–8 English−Language Arts (ELA) Grades 6–7 mathematics Grade 8 science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
16
STAR 2010 STAR 2010 September 10, 2010
Transcript
Page 1: STAR 2010

STAR 2010STAR 2010

September 10, 2010

Page 2: STAR 2010

AgendaAgenda

• New in 2010

• Interpreting reports

• Comparing results

• Appendixes A-G

2

Page 3: STAR 2010

3

What’s New in 2010What’s New in 2010• California Modified Assessment (CMA)

reports– Scale score, performance levels for

• Grades 6–8 English−Language Arts (ELA)• Grades 6–7 mathematics• Grade 8 science

– Percent correct for • ELA grade 9• Life Science, grade 10• Algebra I

Manual (M) 2

Page 4: STAR 2010

4

Results: Reporting ClusterResults: Reporting ClusterCautionsCautions

• Based on small numbers of items; therefore, may not be reliable or generalizable

• NOT equated from year to year

• Should not compare reporting cluster percent correct from year to year

M 8−12;Appendix A

Page 5: STAR 2010

5

Interpreting Reporting Clusters or Interpreting Reporting Clusters or Content Areas Content Areas

in the in the Same YearSame Year• Compare to percent-correct range of

proficient students statewide

M 8−12;Appendix A

Page 6: STAR 2010

6

2010 CST Reporting Clusters: 2010 CST Reporting Clusters: Number of Questions and Number of Questions and Average Percent CorrectAverage Percent Correct

To be finalized with complete data in 2010 Post-Test Guide, after August 16.

M Appendix A

Page 7: STAR 2010

7

ExamplesExamples—Interpreting Reporting —Interpreting Reporting Clusters for the CST for Geometry Clusters for the CST for Geometry M 11

Page 8: STAR 2010

8

Using ResultsUsing Results

• For instructional decisions with other data

• Used in Academic Performance Index (API) calculations: CSTs, CAPA, CMA (only grades 3–8, excluding Algebra I)

• Used in adequate yearly progress (AYP) calculations, ELA and mathematics: – Grades 2–8, CSTs– Grades 3–8, CMA (excluding Algebra I)– Grades 2–8 and 10, CAPA

M 4

Page 9: STAR 2010

9

Year-to-Year ComparisonsYear-to-Year ComparisonsDoDo Compare CSTs: Compare CSTs:

Same Grade and Same Content AreaSame Grade and Same Content Area

• Mean scale score – Same content and grade, varying

years• Percent in each performance level

– Same content by grade across years• e.g., 2009 ELA grade 10 with 2010

ELA grade 10

M 13−16

Page 10: STAR 2010

10

Year-to-Year ComparisonsYear-to-Year ComparisonsDoDo Compare CSTs: Compare CSTs:

Percent Proficient and AdvancedPercent Proficient and Advanced

• Percentage of students scoring at PROFICIENT and above– For a given grade and subject, e.g., Percent

proficient and above for grade 3 math in 2009 and 2010

– For a given subject and aggregated grades, e.g., Percent proficient and above for grades 2– 6 mathematics in 2009 and 2010

– Across grades and a subject, e.g., Percent proficient and above in all courses and all grades

M 13−16

Page 11: STAR 2010

11

Year-to-Year ComparisonsYear-to-Year ComparisonsDON’TDON’T Compare Compare

• Individual scale scores or statistics based on scale scores for different grades or content areas– Subjects by grade are independently scaled – Different content standards are measured in

different grades• Cohorts across grades• Across tests• CMA grades 6−11, STS grades 5−11 to

previous years• CAPA, CMA grades 3−5, STS grades 2−4 to

years before 2009

M 13−16

Page 12: STAR 2010

12

ExampleExample—Using CST Results to —Using CST Results to Compare Grade Results from Year to Compare Grade Results from Year to

YearYear2009 CST for ELA

2010 CST for ELA

Grade % Prof or Above

% Prof or Above

Difference

Grade 2 31% 35% 4%

Grade 3 33% 33% 0%

Grade 4 29% 31% 2%

Grade 5 34% 32% –2%

Grade 6 31% 32% 1%

All Grades

32% 33% 1%

M 14

Page 13: STAR 2010

13

SummarySummary

• Do’s and Don’ts – Do compare mean scale score, percent

at performance levels within same grade, same content area

– Don’t compare mean scale scores across grades, content area

• Summary and Internet reports• Data CDs• Individual reports

Page 14: STAR 2010

AppendixesAppendixes

• Appendix A: STAR Reporting Clusters• Appendix B: STAR Scale Score Ranges• Appendix C: STAR Conditional Standard Errors

of Measurement (CSEM)• Appendix D: Parent/Guardian or School District

Request for Verification of 2010 Test Score• Appendix E: Request to Correct 2010 STAR

CST/CMA and CAPA Demographic Data• Appendix F: California Reading List Number• Appendix G: Glossary of Statistical Terms

September 201014

Page 15: STAR 2010

15

For more information see:For more information see:• http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/sr/• http://www.star.cde.ca.gov/• http://www.startest.org/ • STAR Technical Assistance Center

– 800-955-2954• CDE Accountability

[email protected] – 916-319-0863

Page 16: STAR 2010

To Contact CDETo Contact CDE

• CDE STAR office: 916-445-8765– English–Language Arts tests, including writing: Jamie

Contreras, [email protected], 916-319-0353– Mathematics tests: Jane Liang, [email protected],

916-322-1854– Science tests: Blessing Mupanduki,

[email protected], 916-319-0969– History–Social Science tests: Nicole Jespersen,

[email protected], 916-319-0364– CAPA, CMA: Don Killmer, [email protected], 916-

319-0350

16


Recommended