+ All Categories
Home > Business > Start up seminar-a

Start up seminar-a

Date post: 11-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: wangcheng556688
View: 286 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
38
- 37 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a Organisational redesign of service centers The alternative concepts generate different types of business and rules for service centers Types Objec- tives Risks Suitable for … Competence/ service center central administration Competence/ service center in product company Spin-off (Service GmbH) Outsourcing of service make or buy HQ HQ HQ • Control • Realisation of synergies • Success factors critical to management • Neutrality • Decentralisation • Cost allocation according to the principle of causation • Decentralisation • Entrepreneurship • Focus on core business/ functions • Focus on core business/ functions • Flexibility • Cost transparency • Self-sufficiency • Cost increase • Non-business-orien- ted decisions • Mix of management and service • Loss of neutrality • Short-term cost/performance optimisation • Too much strain/loss of motivation • Neglect of group interests • Know-how drain • Higher transaction costs • Cost control • Irreversible dependencies • Know-how drain • Reduction of internal capacities • Control/system functions • Functions predominantly used by one business field • Non-critical handling functions • Functions using the specific know-how of one business field • Locational functions • Functions with potential to increase efficiency • Guarantee protection of know- how • Marketable functions/services • Functions with large fluctuations of capacity utilisation • No specific group know-how • Functions with clearly defined service volumes HQ Source: Roland Berger & Partner
Transcript
Page 1: Start up seminar-a

- 37 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

Organisational redesign of service centers

The alternative concepts generate different types of business and rules for service centers

Types

Objec-tives

Risks

Suitablefor …

Competence/service center

central administration

Competence/service center inproduct company

Spin-off(Service GmbH)

Outsourcing of servicemake or buy

HQ HQ HQ

• Control• Realisation of synergies• Success factors critical to management• Neutrality

• Decentralisation• Cost allocation according to the principle of causation

• Decentralisation• Entrepreneurship • Focus on core business/ functions

• Focus on core business/ functions• Flexibility• Cost transparency

• Self-sufficiency• Cost increase• Non-business-orien- ted decisions • Mix of management and service

• Loss of neutrality• Short-term cost/performance optimisation

• Too much strain/loss of motivation• Neglect of group interests• Know-how drain

• Higher transaction costs• Cost control• Irreversible dependencies• Know-how drain• Reduction of internal capacities

• Control/system functions

• Functions predominantly used by one business field• Non-critical handling functions• Functions using the specific know-how of one business field• Locational functions

• Functions with potential to increase efficiency• Guarantee protection of know- how• Marketable functions/services

• Functions with large fluctuations of capacity utilisation• No specific group know-how• Functions with clearly defined service volumes

HQ

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 2: Start up seminar-a

- 36 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

Allocation of optional central functions

Allocation alternative Sample companies Reallocated functions

Spin-off(Service GmbH)

HQ

• KHD• Krupp• Mannesmann• Hoesch• Springer• AGROB• Klöckner-Werke AG• Daimler Benz• AEG

• Hardware and software• Auditing• Licensed sales/handling• Personnel management• Central research• Insurances• Training and seminars• Real estate/housing• Forwarding/dispatch• Travel agency

Competence/service center

in business field

HQ

• MBB• VOEST Alpine• Hoesch• Dornier• Freudenberg• AEG

• Accounting• Data processing (primarily hardware)• Locational services (security, canteen etc.)• Purchasing• Training• Payroll accounting• Pensions

Div. Focus on • Org/DP• Accounting functions• Consulting• Locational services

Outsourcing ofservice

HQ

In practice, there are typical, time-honoured concepts for the organisational redesign of service functions

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 3: Start up seminar-a

- 35 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

1.5 Service center

Page 4: Start up seminar-a

- 34 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

The holding company's typical core functions are the result of the type of management pursued

Financialmanagement

Operativemanagement

• Operative controlling/budgeting• Central administrative functions/systems• Coordination of product development/centralised functions• Coordination of distribution/central functions

Management functionsrequired

Staffdimensioning

Type ofmanagement

Increasingnumber offunctions

Strategicmanagement

Typical core functions of a holding company

• Group strategy/ROI participation portfolio• Allocation of resources, finance• Financial management/treasuring• Participation management (reporting)• Investment guidance/monitoring/strategic planning

• Strategic group planning/controlling• Programme planning• Participation planning/M+A projects• Synergy management via committees and central functions• Target coordination of operative plans • Basic issues regarding personnel/management development• Central services/facilities, if applicable

Staffing ofcentral

administration

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Example

Page 5: Start up seminar-a

- 33 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

Entrepreneurial vision and objective

Determinants and characteristics of the holding company's organisation

Type of management pursued by partners

Type of holding

• Financial

• Strategic

• Operative

Functions

• Core functions

• Optional functions

• Service functions

Staffdimensioning

Management conceptand

managementsituation

Managementsystem

and verticalcollaboration

Business/participation portfolioStrategic and operative management

demand

The type of management pursued thus forms the basis for the detailed design of the holding company

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 6: Start up seminar-a

- 32 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

The management focus can lead to three specific types of holding companies regarding management objectives and central functions

Typicalcentral

functions

Managementobjectives

• Maximum return on equity - no matter in which business• Dividend/return on capital• High company values

• Strategic optimisation of resource utilisation• Management of synergies• Management of "white spots"• Industrial management company

• Strategic and operative result optimisation using all business fields• Operative control/optimisation of business fields/functions• Market shares, ROI, growth

• Finance/Treasuring• Legal/tax• Group accounting• Participation management

• Finance• Group controlling• Strategic planning• Executive development• Distribution/sales coordination• Group marketing• Group servicesOptional:• Central research• Group distribution

• Management staffe. g.• Finance/accounting• Central distribution• Central development• Works organisation

Types ofholding

companies

Financial holding co. Strategic management holding co.

Services

Operative management holding co.

Centralbusi-nessunits

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 7: Start up seminar-a

- 31 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

Decentralisation and establishment of management holding companies are the general organisational trends for group organisations

General strategic/organisational trends

Increasing significance of takeovers, mergers and strategic alliances within the framework of internationaldivision of labour and globalisation

Rediscovery of small, flexible, decentralised business units with own entrepreneurship to deconcentrate large companies and utilisation of business potentials

Decentralisation of DP into functions and flexible structure-independent management/communication systems

"From hierarchy to expertocraty" as structural characteristic of large companies, i. e. flat structures and new management requirements

• Necessary business orientation of organisation by way of business field segmentation

• Decentral management and organisational concepts under a minimum of superior structures (as a framework for values, vision and synergies)

• Often extreme re-thinking in the companies due to loss of core business dominance in structures, qualification and culture

Managementholding

organisation

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 8: Start up seminar-a

- 30 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

1.4 Holding concept

Page 9: Start up seminar-a

- 29 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

• Personification of inte- gration is necessary• Multipliers must come from both companies/ become firmly anchored in the other one

Initiator

• Start of communication process with six core issues

Contents

• Most important target group during 1st phase are executives • Executives need to commu- nicate/support integration top-down • Information of responsible executives at Ruther group

Target group

• Focus on existing media• Supplemented by ad hoc transition media later to be integrated into the overall concept

Media

• Reduction of individual interpretations/insecuri- ties• Speeding up top- down information

Effect

Who says what to whom using which media pursuingwhich

goal?

1. Historical development from point zero to present2. Strategy3. Process of integration4. Intercultural collaboration5. Structure/organisation6. Results of transition teams

• CEO of both companies• Executives from both companies

Total number of contacts(Nov./Dec. 94)

20.253(Executives + staff)

• XY actual• AB today• Company newsletter of integrated company• Management summaries• Segment-internal jour fixe

• Achievement of common base of information

Activities during the start phase

The project phases' individual parameters of communication are designed in great detail

Example PMI

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 10: Start up seminar-a

- 28 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

A requirement for successful communication during a PMI-Project is a comparable level of information of all those involved

Start:Communication of decision-making process

Turning point:

Objective:Communication of integration/success and focus on business process/day-to-day business

Phase

Communication of progress/success/decisions in the integration process

1.

2.

3.

Process

Communication

Objective

• Creation of a common basis of information

• First step towards common convictions/opinions• Modification/adjustment of communication

• Anchoring and acceptance of common values, standards and objectives

Tools

Media, e. g.• xy actual• Company newsletter

To be supplemented by:• Personal communication (e. g. social contacts)• Feedback (e. g. survey, workshops)• Management tools (e. g. training/ preparation for rotation)

Closed concept• Top-down• Bottom-up

Information

Information

Feedback

Sender Recei-ver

Communication conceptExample PMI

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 11: Start up seminar-a

- 27 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

1.3 Communication concept (KK)

Page 12: Start up seminar-a

- 26 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

The results of the cultural audit cover the major factors of corporate management

• Strategic success factors

• Characteristics of the company

• Structure

• Working methods

• Staff/executive qualification

• Incentive systems

• Motivation

• Personnel management

• Career development

• Information/communication

• Management style

• Working atmosphere

• Flexibility/readiness to change

• Innovation orientation

• Behaviour towards staff/trust

• Work processes

• Decision-making processes

• Openness/transparency/

communication competence

• Entrepreneurship

• Internationalisation

Resultareas

Questionnaire

relating toindividualquestions

relating to severalquestions

• –––––––––––• –––––––––––• –––––––––––

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 13: Start up seminar-a

- 25 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

The cultural audit is performed in three steps using standardised tools

Pilot phase

• Approx. five to ten interviews/explo-

rations with executives and participants in

the project to determine focus issues

• Adjustment of standardised questionnaire by

integrating the company's specific situation

• Coordination of questionnaire action

• Design of sample/selection of target persons

Collection phase

• Mailing of questionnaires to executives/

staff (incl. explanation of objectives and

procedure)

• Monitoring of questionnaire-return and

evaluation of responses

• Interpretation of responses

• Development of recommendations for

action/measures

Communication of results

• Presentation (Board/executives)

• Management workshops

– Detailed discussion of results

– Expansion/coordination of recommen-

dations for action

• Internal communication in the company

1 2 3

Steps of cultural audit-approach

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 14: Start up seminar-a

- 24 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

The cultural audit identifies weaknesses in the collaboration between a company's staff and its executives

Cultural audit

• Identification of disruptive factors

• Weighted evaluation of identified disruptive factors

Objectives

• Personal interviews – Executives – Staff

• Questionnaires – Executive survey – Staff survey

• Workshops with executives – Guarantee/expansion analysis – Conceptualisation of target culture

Tools

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 15: Start up seminar-a

- 23 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

1.2 Cultural audit (CA)

Page 16: Start up seminar-a

- 22 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

The critical project phase is the deduction of organisational consequences from business system and strategy

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

• Concept development

• Workshop

• Presentation

Development ofdesign conceptsand alternatives

• Management concept/structure

• Organisational structure

Detailed design oftarget organisation

incl. actual/target transition models

Strategy audit

• Identification of strategic position, opportunities/risks, orientation and strategies

• Business field segmentation incl. business system and success factors

• Deduction of strategic and organisational requirements for management, structure and systems

• Expert interviews (internal)

• Secondary data

• Workshops

Pilot interviewsFamiliarisation with business, problem structure and focuses of the survey

• Top management/ shareholder interviews

Step 4

Step 5

Step 2

Step 1

Step 3Organisational

assessment

• Actual organisation and distribution of functions

• Strengths and weaknesses

• Company image and management concept

• Executive discussions (1st - 3rd level)

• Secondary data

Page 17: Start up seminar-a

- 21 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

SBO: From business system to strategy-oriented group structure

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Functional, divisional

servicerelations

Managementconcept

Actual

Businessposition/strategies

Actualtarget

Corporateorganisation/

culture

Actual

Model/targets/visionof partners

and top management

Controlledmanagement

conceptcentral/decentral

Businessfield

identifi-cation

Businessaffinities/synergies

Businessfield

strategies

Businesssystem/successfactors

Manage-ment

system/potential

Strengths/weak-

nesses

Strategic evaluation of functions• Core functions for the management of a business field• Optional functions• Superior control functions

Formation of busi-ness units • Bundling of core

function into manage- ment areas (business

units) • Formation of cen-

tralised functions and service areas

• Organisational structures

Detailed design of target organisation• Management struc- ture of business units• Management structure of superior control/ synergy utilisation• Horizontal and vertical management system• Management requirements

Manage-ment

require-ments

Analysis

Management

require-ment

Corporateculture

Deduction Design

SBO-approach

Page 18: Start up seminar-a

- 20 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

Strategy-based Organisation: How to establish business-oriented organisational structures

Optionalfunctions

Market

Business activities

Businessneeds Core functions

Deduction ofstrategic business

needs

Identification ofcore functions

Creation ofbusiness units

Design of overallmanagement

structure

Adjustment ofmanagement

systems

Segmentation ofbusinessactivities

Management

Advisoryboards

Centralfunctions

Commit-tees

Service-Center

Businessunits

Optionalfunctions

Line functions?

Service functions?

Make or buy?

Subsi-diaries

Internal structure

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 19: Start up seminar-a

- 19 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

1.1 Strategy-based organisation (SBO)

Page 20: Start up seminar-a

- 18 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

Examples of existing consulting programs

1. Strategy-based organisation (SBO)

2. Cultural audit (CA)

3. Communication concept (KK)

4. Holding concept

5. Service center

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 21: Start up seminar-a

- 17 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

1. Classical issues and tools of CC Organisation

Page 22: Start up seminar-a

- 16 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

Newly developed or currently being developed

Consulting programs, tools and new concepts of CC Organisation – an overview

Products/programs Instruments/tools Industry know-howMarketing tools(Issue papers)

Basic studies/organisational concepts

• Benefit for public image/ competence references

• Project modules • Accessibility/ up-to-dateness

• Marketability

• Standardisation (manual)

• Internal training module • Marketing/acquisition base • Innovation for new programmes

• Marketability• Defined client benefit

• Science/practice links

• Internal training

• Basic expertise/know-how• Value for publication• Standard approach • Documentation

(AA)EDP-supported process analyses: Supplement process cost analysis

(SGS)Strategic reduction of overhead/structural adjustment

(FKD)Functional ratios file

(HDD)Holding benchmarking/documentation

(PA)Personnel structure analysis

(ÖHD)Public sector documentation

(CA)Cultural audit

Management systems: Adjustment to divisional requirements

(KA)Cost structure analysis (BRD)Organisational documentation by industry

(CCP)Cultural change programme

Lean management/Business reengineering

(KK)Communication concept

(FA)EDP-supported function analysis

(OGK)Operative reduction of overhead

Study on European management culture

Holding conceptsFamily-owned businesses

(PAD)Personnel structures file

(SBO)Strategy-basedorganisation

(PMI)Post Merger Integration

• CC Marketing

Model for transnational company managementincl. practical examples

(TUF)

Virtual corporation concept

(RL)Implementation guidelines

Networking

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Page 23: Start up seminar-a

- 15 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

B. Tools and concepts of CC Organisation

Page 24: Start up seminar-a

- 14 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

The WDR example shows that interactive projects are more costly, but can achieve better results

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

9 3

6

12Time

Cost2$

5$

2$5$1$5$

QualityErrors

t

Results

• Reduction of processing times by up to 80 %, e. g. fee calculation and remuneration of freelancers from three weeks to three days

• A minimum of DM 18 million direct cost reduction

• Establishment of internal customer/supplier relations reduces error rates and increases customer satisfaction

Example

Page 25: Start up seminar-a

- 13 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

This approach counts on a continuously increasing employee participation in the course of the project

Active and passive participation of employees in the change process

10%

100%

Anchoring, contin-uous improvement

DisseminationPilotimplementation

Actual analysis,target forecast

Kick-off

Communication andoff-and-on

participationWork in the

changedorganisation

Process/project teams

Employees

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Example

Page 26: Start up seminar-a

- 12 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

The pilot implementation forms an integral part of the interactive bottom-up project work at WDR

Selection of process

Actual analysis

Concept and measures

Pilot implementation

DisseminationAnchoring

• Workshops

• Individual tasks

• Basis teams

• Cooperation with

divisions concerned

T C Q

• Pilot region• Set targets• Training• …

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Steps of project work at WDRExample

Page 27: Start up seminar-a

- 11 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

Top-down approach

Objectives definedby the Board

Desk research/benchmarks

Interviews at manager level

Target concept(discussion)

Implementation

Consultant as expert,little interaction

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Steps of project work at Deutz Motor GmbHExample

Page 28: Start up seminar-a

- 10 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

The decision for a consulting approach depends on the objectives pursued

Consultingapproach

RB&Pconsultingprograms

Clientobjectives

Company development

Bottom-up

Starting with the employee

Restructuring

Top-down

Starting with the business system

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Alternative consulting approaches

Page 29: Start up seminar-a

- 9 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

2. What is the proceeding in organisational projects?

Page 30: Start up seminar-a

- 8 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

Fields of application for organisational consulting

• Horizontal and vertical structuring• Functional and object orientation• Centralised – decentralised• Staff line

Structures

• Division of labour – integration of functions• One piece flow• Coordinative mechanisms

Processes and cooperation

• Operative and strategic controlling• Management systems, forums• Incentive systems

Systems

• Thinking in terms of divisions• Value added/customer orientation• Exchange of information

Culture

Management

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Five fields of potential change have to be worked on

Page 31: Start up seminar-a

- 7 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

The main objective of organisational consulting is to improve efficiency and effectiveness of an organisation

External factors

Internal factors

Time, cost and qualityas competitive factors

Activities in the world market Technological progress

Product/market diversity Complex structures Size

• Reduced product life cycles and market cycles• Delivery time and flexibility of delivery

• Eastern Europe• Globalisation• Competitive/cost pressure

• High demand for capital and know-how• New technologies as success factor

• Diversity of business• High coordination expenses

• High degree of division of labour• Many hierarchical levels• Staffs

• Turnover• Employees• Countries

• Increase flexibility• Strengthen innovative power• Improve ability to cooperate• Manage core competences

Objectives of organisational consulting

Source: Roland Berger & Partner

Determinants and objectives of organisational consulting

Page 32: Start up seminar-a

- 6 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

International organisational structures – an overview

Page 33: Start up seminar-a

- 5 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

1. What is organisational consulting?

Page 34: Start up seminar-a

- 4 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

A. Object and approach of CC Organisation

Page 35: Start up seminar-a

- 3 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

Page 36: Start up seminar-a

- 2 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

A. Object and approach of Organisation 41. What is organisational consulting? 52. What is the proceeding in organisational projects? 9

B. Tools and concepts of CC Organisation 151. Classical issues and tools of CC Organisation 172. New consulting programs 38

C. Structure and tasks of CC Organisation 44

Index Page

Page 37: Start up seminar-a

- 1 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

Roland Berger & Partner GmbH – International Management Consultants

Barcelona – Beijing – Berlin – Brussels – Bucharest – Budapest – Buenos Aires – Düsseldorf – Frankfurt – Hamburg – Helsinki – Hong Kong – Kiev – Lisbon – LondonMadrid – Milan – Moscow – Munich – New York – Paris – Prague – Riga – Rome – São Paulo – Shanghai – Stockholm – Stuttgart – Tel Aviv – Tokyo – Vienna

Start-up Seminar

– Organisation –

Roland Berger & Partner GmbHInternational Management Consultants

Munich, August 1997

Page 38: Start up seminar-a

- 0 - MUC-0140-97097-02-6a

MUC-0140-97097-02-06 6 0140/Dr. Simon x 58 0 58 58 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0

Remarks:

Doc.Controlling: Doc.Controlling: Doc.Controlling:

Client:

Project number:

Project title:

Project start:

Branch office:

Partner/Competence Center:

Documentation title:

Type of document (e.g. workshop):

Date of issue/of presentation:

Place where hard copy is filed:

Resp. for preparation:

Resp. for graphic:

document INFOrmation document INFOrmation

One-doc. Seiten: Korrekturen: Planung: Arbeitstage …

Doc.Code No.: Cost centre +

Project manager:KW ja nein

ange-meldet

neuerstellt

alteüber-

nommen

ver-wendet

KDLneue

SeitenKDL

KDLnachPräs.

Korrekt.zeit

(Min.)

zw.Anmeld.

+Abgabe

zw.Fertig-stell. +Präs.

Produk-tion

Verzugs-zeit

(Min.)

Automatische Trennung:

Dokument zu-letzt geöffnet am:

06.05.199916:04 Uhr

"Ein" "Aus"

Vorlagen:

gut schlecht

Fax

mittel

Controlling inSammellisteeingegeben

Intern

A 97000 140 97

MUC

Dr. Simon/OrgaEinführungsseminar

Workshop

Februar ‘97

Fr. Ruff

Hr. Padberg

Hr. Böhm

Textfeld

x x

✔☞


Recommended