+ All Categories
Home > Documents > State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

Date post: 28-Nov-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
40
STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS Honolulu, Hawaii April 24, 2015 Board of Land and Natural Resources State of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii REGARDING: Conservation District Enforcement KA 13-18 Alleged Unauthorized Land Uses Located in the Conservation District LANDOWNER: Carl David LOCATION! KühiO Hwy, Hã’ena, Kaua’i Tax Map Key: (4) 5-9-002:065 SUBZONE: Limited DESCRIPTION OF AREA: The subject parcel is located on the north shore of Kaua’i and was created by the Hã’ena Hui Partition of 1967. The general area may be characterized as rural. Neighboring lots contain residential dwellings. The area lies within the Limited subzone of the Conservation District and within flood hazard yE. A stream is to the east and undeveloped land lies to the south (mauka) of the property. ALLEGED UNAUTHORIZED LAND USES (Exhibits A-El The following chronology discusses the alleged unauthorized land uses: November 24, 2012 A DOCARE Officer conducted a cursory site inspection of the subject property due to a number of complaints regarding noise, sanitation and unauthorized land uses. The site inspection revealed a house trailer, an outhouse, storage shed, an open air pavilion and rock walls. (Exhibit F] December 5, 2012 Notice was sent to the landowner identifying the alleged unauthorized land uses; the statute describing potential Board imposed fmes for unauthorized land uses; notice that any information provided may be used in civil proceedings; and contact information for OCCL. [Exhibit G] January 22, 2013 The OCCL is in receipt of Attorney Walton Hong’s response on behalf of Carl and Shelly David. Mr. Hong’s correspondence stated Mrs. David had acquired the property in 2008 and noted what was brought to the property and improvements that were made. This would include: A portable house trailer; construction of a storage shed, an outdoor pavilion, a Balinese style antique sleeping bed; restroom facilities connected to a septic system ITEM K-i
Transcript
Page 1: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

STATE OF HAWAIIDEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCESOFFICE OF CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS

Honolulu, Hawaii

April 24, 2015Board of Land andNatural ResourcesState of HawaiiHonolulu, Hawaii

REGARDING: Conservation District Enforcement KA 13-18 Alleged Unauthorized LandUses Located in the Conservation District

LANDOWNER: Carl David

LOCATION! KühiO Hwy, Hã’ena, Kaua’iTax Map Key: (4) 5-9-002:065

SUBZONE: Limited

DESCRIPTION OF AREA:The subject parcel is located on the north shore of Kaua’i and was created by the Hã’ena HuiPartition of 1967. The general area may be characterized as rural. Neighboring lots containresidential dwellings. The area lies within the Limited subzone of the Conservation District andwithin flood hazard yE. A stream is to the east and undeveloped land lies to the south (mauka)of the property.

ALLEGED UNAUTHORIZED LAND USES (Exhibits A-El

The following chronology discusses the alleged unauthorized land uses:

November 24, 2012 A DOCARE Officer conducted a cursory site inspection of the subjectproperty due to a number of complaints regarding noise, sanitation andunauthorized land uses. The site inspection revealed a house trailer, anouthouse, storage shed, an open air pavilion and rock walls. (Exhibit F]

December 5, 2012 Notice was sent to the landowner identifying the alleged unauthorized landuses; the statute describing potential Board imposed fmes for unauthorizedland uses; notice that any information provided may be used in civilproceedings; and contact information for OCCL. [Exhibit G]

January 22, 2013 The OCCL is in receipt of Attorney Walton Hong’s response on behalf ofCarl and Shelly David. Mr. Hong’s correspondence stated Mrs. David hadacquired the property in 2008 and noted what was brought to the propertyand improvements that were made. This would include: A portable housetrailer; construction of a storage shed, an outdoor pavilion, a Balinese styleantique sleeping bed; restroom facilities connected to a septic system

ITEM K-i

Page 2: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

Board of Land and Enforcement KA 13-18Natural Resources

approved by the State Department of Health; and lining the existinghollow-tile wall with rocks. [Exhibit H]

March 15, 2013 OCCL responds to Mr. Hong’s correspondence to inform him that theparcel is in the Limited subzone of the Conservation District and there areno records of authorization for improvements. To resolve matters, it wasrequested that all improvements be removed and the property beremediated. No action taken could result in Board imposed fines for theunauthorized land uses. [Exhibit I]

June 5, 2013 The OCCL is in receipt of Mr. Hong’s correspondence stating: “Thesubject property has been under foreclosure proceedings. The currentowners of the property, Joseph Carl David and Shelly Rielh David, areexploring various options to address the foreclosure issues and avoid thesale of the property. Unfortunately, the foreclosure matter is of the utmostpriority for the Davids at this time. Once the foreclosure matter is resolved,the Davids fully intend to address the violation matter with yourdepartment. In the meantime, they ask for your understanding andconsideration in delaying the addressing of the matter. [Exhibit J]

August 5, 2013 The OCCL is in receipt of Mr. Hong’s correspondence stating: “The partiescould not reach an agreement to hold off the foreclosure. TheCommissioner has scheduled the auction for August 15, 2013, at 12noon. . . We will keep you posted as to the results of the foreclosureauction.” [Exhibit K & U

May 30, 2014 Carl David as the grantee of the deed to the property is recorded in theBureau of Conveyances. (Exhibit MI

September 2014 Staff contacted Mr. Hong regarding a status update of the matter. Mr.Hong stated he needed to consult with his client.

December 9, 2014 Site inspection by staff revealed unauthorized land uses still exists on theproperty and additional improvements [gates] were conducted. (ExhibitN]

The Department has not authorized any of the land uses on the subject parcel.

RESOLUTION OF UNAUTHORIZED LAND USES:

Conservation DistrictThe Hawai ‘i Revised Statutes (HRS), Chapter 183 C, and the Hawai’ i Administrative Rules(HAR), Chapter 13-5, regulate land uses in the Conservation District by identifying land usesthat may be allowed by Conservation District Use Permit (CDUP). § 13-5-2, HAR defines “landuse” as:

2

Page 3: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

Board of Land and Enforcement KA 13-18Natural Resources

(1) The placement or erection of any solid material on land if that material remains on theland more than thirty days, or which causes a permanent change in the land area on•which it occurs;

(2) The grading, removing, harvesting, dredging, mining, or extraction of any material ornatural resource on land;

(3) The subdivision of land; or(4) The construction, reconstruction, demolition, or alteration of any structure, building, or

facility on land.

The house trailer, storage shed, rock-lined hollow-tile wall, outdoor pavilion, Balinese styleantique sleeping bed, restroom facilities connected to a septic system approved by the StateDepartment of Health have been on the land for over 30-days, and therefore qualify as land usesas defined in HAR, § 13-5-2.

HAR, § 13-5-6, Penalty states: (a) Any person, firm, government agency, or corporationviolating any of the provisions of this chapter or permits issued pursuant thereto shall bepunished as provided in chapter 1 83C, HRS.

HRS, § 1 83C-7 Penalty for violation notes (a) The department shall prescribe administrativeprocedures as it deems necessary for the enforcement of this chapter and (b) Any personviolating this chapter or any rule adopted in accordance with this chapter shall be fined not morethan $15,000 per violation in addition to administrative costs, costs associated with land orhabitat restoration, and damages to public land or natural resources, or any combination thereof.After written or verbal notification from the department, willful violation of this chapter or anyrule adopted in accordance with this chapter may incur and additional fine of up to $15,000 perday per violation for each day in which the violation persists.

Based on the Conservation District Violation Penalties Schedule Guidelines and Assessmentof Damages to Public Land or Natural Resources, Section 2.1 Penalty Calculation; WhereStaff was unable to associate the unauthorized use with a typical land use identified in HawaiiAdministrative Rules (HAR) § 13-5, Staff may try to associate the action with the most similaridentified land use in HAR § 13-5, or according to the “harm to the resource” caused by theviolation. (Exhibit 0]

Under the Penalties Schedule Guideline, the unauthorized house trailer is considered a “Major”unauthorized land use since the identified land use, a single family residence, would require aBoard Permit under the permit prefix “D”. This violation follows a penalty range of $10,000 to$15,000.

The outdoor pavilion and a Balinese style antique sleeping bed may be unidentified land usesthat may be considered “Moderate” as the most similar land use would be a shelter, which wouldrequire a Departmental Permit under the permit prefix “C”. This violation follows a penaltyrange of $2,000 to 10,000.

The rock-lined hollow-tile walls and gates are considered “Moderate” under the PenaltiesSchedule Guideline since the construction of these existing unauthorized features would require

3

Page 4: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

Board of Land and Enforcement KA 13-18Natural Resources

a Departmental permit under the permit prefix “C”. This violation follows a penalty range of$2,000- $10,000.

The storage shed and restroom facilities are considered “Minor” since the construction of theseexisting features [if these land uses were accessory to a permitted land use] would require a SitePlan Approval under the permit prefix “B”. This violation follows a penalty range of $1,000 -

$2,000.

The unauthorized placement of the -portable house trailer, outdoor pavilion, Balinese styleantique sleeping bed, storage shed, restroom facilities connected to a septic system, rock-linedhollow-tile walls and gates are land uses that occurred in the Conservation District withoutapproval and therefore allegedly violated the above referenced chapters and rules.

DISCUSSIONThe penalty range for the unauthorized land uses will be substantially determined based on thetype of permit that would have been required, had the landowner applied to the Department toconduct identified land uses. While the outdoor pavilion, Balinese style antique sleeping bed andportable house trailer are not permanent structures; the structures have remained on the land formore than 30-days and by definition are a land use.

The house trailer may be an identified land use that requires a Board Conservation District UsePermit (CDUP) pursuant to the HAR, § 13-5-23, L-3 Single Family residence.

The function of the Balinese style antique sleeping bed and separate outdoor pavilion must bereviewed by the Department to determine if there is an identified land use in which an after thefact authorization may be applied for.

The rock-lined hollow-tile walls and gates are identified land uses that require a DepartmentalConservation District Use Permit pursuant to the HAR, § 13-5-22, P-l3, Land and ResourceManagement.

Staff notes, while the landowner and his counsel stated they would like to resolve this matterexpeditiously, actions did not demonstrate this. Upon hearing of the foreclosure action, staffpatiently waited to be contacted of the outcome as correspondences from the landownersrepresentative stated, “We will keep you posted as to the results of the foreclosure auction.”

Based upon public record, it appears the foreclosure action resulted in the Davids being able toretain the property. However staff was not notified as stated. Staff had to initiate contact withthe landowners counsel every few months for a status update. No action to resolve this matterwas forthcoming from the landowner. The unauthorized land uses continue to exist and theviolations have been pending for over two years.

Photos taken 12/20 14 illustrate wooden gates that were not present in former photos. It appearsimprovements continued on the parcel while the landowner had knowledge that allegedviolations were pending on the parcel. [Exhibit Pj

4

Page 5: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

Board of Land and Enforcement KA 13-18Natural Resources

FINDINGS

1. That the landowner did in fact, authorize, cause or allow: the placement of a house trailer;outdoor pavilion; Balinese style antique sleeping bed; a storage shed; restroom facilities;rock-lined hollow-tile walls;

2. That the landowner continued to conduet improvements to the property by installinggates without authorization while a violation was pending on the parcel; and

3. That the unauthorized land uses occurred within the State Land Use ConservationDistrict, Limited Subzone.

AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS AS FOLLOWS:That, pursuant to HRS, § 1 83C-7, the Board finds the landowner in violation of HAR, § 13-5-23,and is subject to the following:

1. The landowner is fined $15,000 for violating the provisions of HAR, § 13-5-23, for theplacement of a house trailer; an outdoor pavilion; and a Balinese style antique sleepingbed within the Conservation district, Limited subzone prior to obtaining the appropriateapprovals within the Conservation District;

2. The landowner is fined $15,000 pursuant to HRS, §183C-7(b) for willful violation of awritten notification from the Department by continuing to conduct improvements to theproperty by installing wooden gates without authorization;

3. The landowner is fined $10,000 for violating the provisions of HAR, § 13-5-23, for theunauthorized construction of a storage shed, septic system and rock-lined hollow-tilewalls, by failing to obtain the appropriate approvals within the Conservation District;

4. The landowner is fined an additional $700.00 for administrative costs associated with thesubject violations;

5. The landowner shall pay all designated fines and administrative costs that totals $40,700within 180 days of the date of the Board’s action;

6. The landowner shall remove or file an After the Fact Conservation District UseApplication within 60-days for the house trailer, outdoor pavilion and Balinese styleantique sleeping bed, rock-lined hollow-tile walls, wooden gates, storage shed and septicsystem;

7. Should the landowner wish to retain identified land uses by filing an After the FactConservation District Use Application, a Conservation District Use Permit shall beobtained within 2-years of the Board’s action;

8. The landowner shall comply with all applicable statutes, ordinances, rules, andregulations of the Federal, State and County governments;

5

Page 6: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

Board of Land and Enforcement KA 13-18Natural Resources

9. That in the event of failure of the landowner to comply with any order herein, thelandowner shall be fined an additional $15,000 per day until the order is complied with;

10. That in the event of failure of the landowner to comply with any order herein, this mattershall be turned over to the Attorney General for disposition, including all administrativecosts; and

11. The above noted conditions of Enforcement file KA 13-18 shall be recorded with thedeed instrument pursuant to HAR, § 13-5-6(e).

Respectfully submitted,

K. Tiger Mills, Staff PlannerOffice of Conservation and Coastal Lands

Approved for submittal:

C ty S han , I erim Chairpersona of Lan d Natural Resources

6

Page 7: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

4/28/2003

3/20/2005,

TMK: (4) 5-9-002:065

EXHIBIT ,&

Page 8: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

9/10/2011Idit VI.* 1oI, Ad,I tldp

3/28/2012TMK: (4) 5-9-002:065

EXHIBIT

Page 9: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

Goo

gle

Ear

th1

2/1

6/2

01

3

TM

K:

(4)

5-9-

002:

065

EXH

IBIT

C

Page 10: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

Page 1 of 1

ri ri C) F *2.1 t•-‘

1 jT I—

L L.Owner and Parcel Information

Owner Name DAVID,CARL tTodays DatePD BOX 386Mailing Address

HANALET, HI 96714

LL2M!I - - Zrae-!-t..Residential ]Parcel Map Show Parcel MepJ

, 5861-1 Land Area (acres) 0.3166

Assessment Information Show Histc

Total MarketValue

-r-r-i Year Built,,,,J Effective Year Built

j 2013

Improvement Information

Living Area $‘aedrooms/FwiBath/HairBath

687 2/1/1

Sketch

Sketch Building 1

Other Building and Yard ImprovementsDescription Quantity

METAL UTIUTY SHED 1

Sales Information

Instrument I DateDescription Recorded

Current Tax Bill Information 2014 Tax Payments Show Historical Taxes

Tax Period I Description j ::9t Assessment I Credits I TI

L 20142fReal Property Tax j 02/2D/2015 $1,938.94j0.0O$1,938j4,_

L29!tL..... z:irz_..Lsat i,.÷ &99 136M9 $ts00T $000

RtSlNlhbhood]

___ __ _____

Keuei Home

Xauai County Tax Assessor’s Office makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the dataItiein, its use or interpretation. Website Updattd: .?nu.a.nhB, 2015 . —

...

© 2810 by the Kaeai Ceussy Tax Asseaser’s Office! Website design by aeeblic.net

EXHIBIT u

Location Address

Tax Classification

Neighborhood Code

Legal Information

Parcel Number

Return to Main Search Paoe Kauai Home

1 January 8, 2015

I TaxYear classification

LOT 61 HAENA MIII 13792 SF DES Land Area (approximate sq It)

590020650000

1 13,791

Total AssessedValue

2015 1 Residential I $ 574,500 $ 574,500 $0 -

Total ExemptionTotal

Net TaxableValue

I Pa I Permit Number

Sale Date

Permit InformatIon

Price ! Instrument #

2009

Year Built I Area

Reason

No permit information associated with this parcel.

InstrumentType

200

Permit Amount

- ---

, ! 14-A- FEEj05/29/2014 $ 1,000 l 52630738 I CONVEYANCE 05/30/2014;;a: 5253D834 CONVEYANCE 05/20/2014——.

105/19/2014 $ 1,000 J 52034 CONVNCE 05/20/2014

i11/29/2013 $ 312,00051050297 1 CONVEYANCE 12/23/2013

I12 J46fl0169fCONVEYANCE

07/11/2008 $ 679,000J 08-113786CONVEYANCE 07/16/2008rEEtNJ

hhi’25/2003 $ 10,000 03-265920 j. CONVEYANCE - -

12/03/2003

L/LI,,AS2$NEL106/20/2000 175,0001 0000089835

CONVEYANCE 06/29/2000

Tax bill computed to 01131/2015

Penalty Interest j Other I Amount

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 1,938.94

$ 1,938.94 $ 0.00 $ 1,974.94 $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00, $ 1,974.94

$0.00 $ 36.00

httrr//nnithlinQ nnithlio net/hi lctnicii rliwnltar nhn9nniintsr=l’ii 11ik7T(PV=coflhflflnflflfl 1 /Q/’Dfll c

Page 11: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

Kauai Building Sketcher Page 1 of 1

VV’ (rry iii!

Parcel Number: 590020650000

7 NBuilding Number: 1

[

Enlar2e

c9!iALfdqaet

A MAIN AREA 426

IV

1ST STY FRAME 156

C 1ST STY FRAMEV 25

D 1ST STY FRAME 80

EXHIBIT

iose Windowf

hti-rv//rn,ith1Q rrnithUr t/rhir/1 lrrni th r1zcOnflAU.,,—1 1 Ifl p_V)A1

Page 12: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

November 24, 2012 TMK: (4) 5-9-002:065

LXHIBIT ,

Page 13: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

November 24, 2012 TMK: (4) 5-9-002:065

4

L.

• .•

EXHB1T F.

Page 14: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

NEIL AIIERCROMBIEGOVERNOR OF NAWArI

REF:OCCL:TM

STATE OF HAWAIIDEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES

OFFICE OF CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDSPOST OFFICE BOX 621

HONOLULU, HAWAI’I 96809

WILLIAM J. AILA, JR.CHAIRPERSON

BOARD OR LASS!) AN1)NATURAL RESOURCESCOM1ESSIONON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

ESTHER KIA’AINAEIRSTDEPUTY

WILLIAM M. TAMOSPUrYDISECTOR -WATER

AQUATIC RESOURCESBOATING AND OCEAN RECREATION

I3UREAU OF CONVEYANCESCOMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDSCONSERVATION AN!) RESOURCES ENFORCEMENT

ENGINEERINGFORES11!RY AND WUDLWRHISTORIC PRESERVATION

KANOOLAWE ISLAND RESERVE COMMISSIONLAND

STATE PARKS

ENF: KA 13-18

CERTIFIED MAIL7(X3 3410 () 4942 93D9David C & Shelly R. JosephP.O. Box 386Hanalei, HI 96714

The OCCL notes your property appears to lie within the Conservation District Limited subzone. TheOCCL regulates land uses within the Conservation District. However the OCCL has no record ofauthorizations for the noted improvements. Therefore there appears to be alleged Conservation Districtuse violations.

Be aware, pursuant to 183C-7, HRS, the Board of Land and Natural Resources may subject parties tofines of up to $15,000.00 per violation in addition to administrative costs for unauthorized land uses inthe Conservation District. After written or verbal notification from the Department, willful violation mayincur an additional fine of up to $15,000.00 per day per violation for each day in which the violationpersists.

Should you have evidence of authorization for any of the noted uses, please forward that information toour Office. Further you may wish to propose resolutions to resolve the alleged unauthorized uses.However please note any information provided may be used in civil proceedings.

You will find Chapter 13-5, Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), the rules and regulations of theConservation District, on our website at hawaii.gov/dlnr/occl. Please respond to this correspondencewithin 30 days. Should you have any questions regarding this Tiger Mills of our Office at(808) 587-0382.

C: ChairpersonKDLO/DOCARE-Kaua’ iCounty of Kaua’i, Planning Dept.

J. Leitino, Administratorof Conservation and Coastal Lands

91IT m

I

DEC 52012

SUBJECT: Alleged Unauthorized Land Uses in the Conservation District Located at Kuhio Hwy,Haena Hui Lot 61, Haena, Kaua’i, TMK: (4) 5-9-002:065

Dear Mr and Ms Joseph

On November 24, 2012, a cursory site inspection was conducted of your property due to a number ofcomplaints regarding sanitation and alleged unauthorized land uses. The site inspection revealed mobilecampers, an outhouse, storage shed, an open air pavilion and stacked rock walls (Exhibit A, B & C).

Page 15: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...
Page 16: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...
Page 17: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

•1

Page 18: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

LAW OFFICES OF

‘vr r v i.i - TELEPHONE (808) 245-4757WALTON DY HONG v ALTON - . 110NG%ELECOPIER (808) 245 5175

ATTORNEY AT LAWAIawCorporatioi “

3135 AKAHI STREET, SUITE ALIHUE,KAUAI,HAWA1196766-1106 1013 JAN 22 A ii’ 51

January 18, 2013

NAJESSThTE OF HAWAif

Department of Land and Natural ResourcesOffice of Conservation and Coastal LandsAttention: Mr. Samuel J. LemmoPO. Box 621Honolulu, HI 96809

Re: Haena Hui Lot 61, KauaiTMK: (4th) 5-9-02-65Carl and Shelly DavidENF: KA 13-18

Dear Mr. Lemmo,

We have been retained by Carl and Shelly David, owners of the above-referencedproperty, and am responding to your letter of December 5, 2012. I apologize for the tardiness ofthis response letter, but I left a message for Tiger Mills before I left on a trip to China; I onlyreturned last week.

Mrs. David acquired the property in 2008. At that time, she and her husband resided inMinnesota, and would periodically visit and maintain the property. To provide accommodationsfor them during their visits, they brought in a portable house trailer. Over the years since theyacquired the property, they undertook actions to improve the property. These included theconstruction of a storage shed, an outdoor pavilion, a Balinese style antique sleeping bed (whichhas not been used for sleeping or habitation purposes), and restroom facilities connected to aseptic system approved by the State Department of Health. Incidentally, the portable toiletshown in the photograph attached your letter was being used only temporarily for a party givenby the Davids, and has long since been removed. They also lined an existing hollow tile wallwith rocks in an effort to beautify the property.

Prior to undertaking these actions, the Davids made inquiry with the County PlanningDepartment, and were informed originally that any structure not exceeding 120 square feet(subsequently changed to 200 square feet) in floor area would not require a building permit.Based on those representations, the Davids proceeded with the said improvements within thepermissible limits. They were not aware of any distinction between the State Land Use “Urban”and “Conservation” district boundaries, and the different permitting requirements under thoserespective district boundaries.

Page 19: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

Department of Land and Natural ResourcesAttention: Mr. Samuel J. LemmoJanuary 18, 2013Page 2 of 2

It was only when I met with the Davids last week and explained the different levels ofzoning and requirements did they begin to comprehend the nature of the alleged violations. Withthis knowledge, the Davids are willing to work with your department to resolve this matter in areasonable and appropriate manner.

Accordingly, we are seeking your suggestions as to a course of action acceptable to yourDepartment or the Board of Land and Natural Resources to resolve the issue of allegedviolations. As soon as an acceptable course is determined, we will move expeditiously toaddress the matter.

Thank you for your consideration and assistance in this matter. If there are anyquestions, please feel free to contact me.

Yours very truly,

Walton D. Y. Hong

WDYH:wh

cc: Mr. and Mrs. David

Page 20: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

WILLIAM .1 AILA, JR.NEIL ABERCROMBIE

ROARS) OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCESGOVERNOR OF IAfI COMIAISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAOES,NV

ESTHER I(JA’AINAFIRST DEPUTY

WILLIAM BR TAMDEPUTY DIRECTOR- WATER

AQUATIC RESOURCESBOATING AND OCEAN RECREATION

BUREAU OF CONVEYANCESCOMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGE?NVNT

CONSERVATION AlSO COASTAL LANDSCONSERVATION AND RESOURCES ENFORCESNDNT

ENGINEERINGFORESTEY AND WILDLWEHISTORIC PRESERVATION

KANOOLAWE ISLAND RESERVE COMMISSION

STATE PARKS

Walton D.Y. Hong MAR 1 520133135 Akahi Street, Suite ALihue, Hawai’i 96766-1106

Dear Mr. Hong:

The Office of Conservation and Coastal Lands (OCCL) is in receipt of your response regarding thesubject matter. According to your information, Ms. Shelly David acquired the property in 2008. Yourclients would periodically visit and maintain the property. As they resided in Minnesota, they brought ina portable house trailer. Improvements made on the property include the construction of a storage shed,an outdoor pavilion, a Balinese style antique sleeping bed which, according to your information, has notbeen used for sleeping or habitation purposes, and restroom facilities connected to a septic system. Inaddition, an existing hollow tile wall has been lined with rocks in an effort to beautify the property.

The OCCL notes, the subject area lies within the Limited subzone of the Conservation District. We haveno record of authorization for any improvements upon the property. To resolve this matter, your clientsmay wish to remove all improvements and remediate the property within 90 days. A site inspection willbe conducted to verify the removal of the unauthorized land uses. Once this matter is resolved, yourclient may apply for land uses within the Conservation District Limited subzone.

Should no action be taken, please be aware, pursuant to 1 83C-7, FIRS, the Board of Land and NaturalResources may subject parties to fines of up to $15,000.00 per violation in addition to administrativecosts for unauthorized land uses in the Conservation District. After writtep-or-v ‘ - from theDepartment, willful violation may incur an additional fine of up to $1 51)00.00 per foreach day in which the violation persists.

C: ChairpersonKDLOjDOCARE-Kaua’iCounty of Kaua’ i, Planning Dept.

REF:OCCL:TM

STATE OF HAWAI’IDEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES

OFFICE OF CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDSPOST OFFICE BOX 621

HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809

ENF: KA 13-18

SUBJECT: Alleged Unauthorized Land Uses in the Conservation District Located at Kuhio Hwy,Ha’ena Hui Lot 61, Ha’ena, Kaua’i, TMK: (4) 5-9-002:065

The rules and regulations of the Conservation District, known asRules (HAR), may be found on our website at hawaii.gov/dlnr/occl.regarding this matter, contact Tiger Mills of our 5 87-03

questions

Office of Conservation and Coastal Lands

I

Page 21: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

LAW OFFICES OF

‘ ON D Y HONG TELEPHONE (808) 245-4757WALTOND.Y. HONGTELECOPIER (808) 245-5175

A1TORNEYATLAWALawCorporation

3I35AKAHISTREET,SUITEA tnwLIHUE, KAUAI, HAWAII 967664106

June 3, 2013 213 JU —S A 33

%, &RCSHSTATE OF HA’)A1[

Department of Land and Natural ResourcesOffice of Conservation and Coastal LandsAttention: Mr. Samuel J. LemmoP.O. Box 621Honolulu, HI 96809

Re: ENE: KA 13-18Alleged Unauthorized Land UsesKauai TMK: (4) 5-9-002-065

Dear Mr. Lemmo,

This is a follow-up to your letter of March 15, 2013, and my conversation with TigerMills of your department last week.

The subject property has been under foreclosure proceedings. The current owners of theproperty, Joseph Carl David and Shelly Riehl David, are exploring various options to address theforeclosure issues and avoid the sale of the property. Unfortunately, the foreclosure matter is ofthe utmost priority for the Davids at this time.

Once the foreclosure matter is resolved, the Davids fully intend to address the violationmatter with your department. In the meantime, they ask for your understanding andconsideration in delaying the addressing of the matter.

I will keep you infoimed as to the status of the foreclosure proceedings.

Thank you for your assistance. If there are any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Yours very truly,

\ J— -

Walton D. Y. Hong

WDYH:wh

cc: Carl David

L1

Page 22: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

LAW OFFICES OF

WALTON D Y HONG TELEPHONE (808) 245-4757WALTONDY. HONG

TELECOPIER (808) 245-5175

ATTORNEYATLAWA Law Corporation - L L. IlL)

3135 AKAHI STREET, SUITE ALIHUE, KAUAI, HAWAII 96766-1106

6 — S A 9: 22

August 1,2013 O%’T OF.L.U &NVu.! SOURCES

STMTE OF HAWAII

Department of Land andNatural Resources

Office of Conservation and Coastal LandsAttn: Ms. Tiger MillsP. 0. Box 621Honolulu, HI 96809

Re: ENE: KA13-18Alleged Unauthorized Land UsesKauai TMK: (4) 5-9-002-065

Dear Ms. Mills:

This letter will confirm my conversation with you this date, regarding the status of theforeclosure proceedings on the above-referenced property.

Unfortunately, the parties could not reach an agreement to hold off the foreclosure.The Commissioner has scheduled the auction for August 15, 2013, at 12:00 noon on the stepsof the Kauai Judiciary Complex.

We will keep you posted as to the results of the foreclosure auction.

Thank you for your patience in this matter. If there are any questions regarding theabove, please feei free to contact me.

Yours very truly,

Walton D. V. Hong

WDYH:ckfcc: Mr. Carl David

Page 23: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

thegardenisland.com Page 1 of 1

Back \J(

NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE SALENOTICE OF FORECLOSURE SALE

First Hawaiian Bank vs. Shelly Riehi David, et al.Civil No. 12-1-0 160, In the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit,

State of Hawaii

Lot6IHaenaflui

Flaena, Kauai Hawaii

TMK: (4) 5-9-002-065 (Fee Simple)

Lot containing 13,792 square feet, more or less, and an undivided 1/9th interest in Road Lot “G”, Kuhio Highway, Haena,Kauai, Hawaii.

AUCTION DATE: Thursday, August 15, 2013 at 12:00 noon, Front Steps, Fifth Circuit Court Building. 3970 KaanaStreet, Lihue, Kauai, Hawaii 96766.

TERMS OF SALE: No upset price. Property sold in “as is” condition at public auction with 10% of highest bid payable incash, certified or cashiers check at close of auction, balance payable upon deliveiy of title. Potential bidders must be able

to provide proof of ability to comply with 10% of bid requirement prior to participating in the public auction. Mortgagee isauthorized to purchase at said foreclosure sale and may satisfy the down payment by way of offset upto the amount of thesecured debt. Buyer shall pay all costs of closing including escrow, conveyance and recordation fee, conveyance taxes andis responsible for securing possession of the property upon recordation. At the Court’s discretion, the 10% deposit may beforfeited in full or in part if the buyer fails to pay the balance of the purchase price. The Commissioner will deliver title by

a Commissioner’s Quitelaim Deed. SALE SUBJECT TO COURT CONFIRMATION.

No scheduled open houses. Inspection to be by prior arrangement with Commissioner.

For further information contact:JOSEPH N. KOBAYASHI

P.O. Box 589Kapaa, Kauai, Hawaii 96746Telephone: (808) 822-9000Facsimile (808) 822-9436

(TG1539513 7/18, 7/25, 8/1/13)

1,ffr•//i-r, fi I I.—..-v..+-.IOl—1 I\ c. ,

Page 24: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

E';sl

.....

m

..........

,. ..

... .,- _.

.,.,

__.,

OJ

-=- -1

.; 3

Bu

rea

u o

f C

on

ve

ya

nc

es

-O

ffic

ial

Pu

blic

Re

co

rds

Do

cu

me

nt

Nu

mb

erA

52

63

07

38

No

. of

Pag

es

6p

age

s

Fee

I@)

56.0

0

Re

co

rdin

g Da

te I@

2

014-05-

30

Des

crip

tio

n

DE

ED

Gra

nto

r .Q!

R

IEHL

REM

ING

TO

N H

TR

Gra

ntee

DA

VID

CA

RL

TMK

IQJ

4-5-9-0

02

-06

5-

No

tes

D L

OT

61

HA

EN

A H

Ut

Ch

oo

se t

he

typ

e o

f d

oc

um

en

t to

pu

rch

ase

:

•J

):-E

lec

tro

nic

No

n-Ce

rtifi

ed

(d

ow

nlo

ad

im

me

dia

tely

aft

er

pu

rch

ase

-u

nli

mit

ed

do

wn

loa

d a

va

ila

ble

fo

r u

p t

o 1

0 d

ay

s a

fte

r p

urc

ha

se

)

0

Pri

nte

d &

Ce

rtifie

d (

rece

ive

by

US

PS

-m

aile

d i

n 5

-7 b

usi

ne

ss

da

ys)

Page 25: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

KA 13-18 {4) 5-9-Q02:06512/09/2014

,, ' I • I � '

.. t· � ... '

..... ' ,,

Page 26: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

KA 13-18 (4) 5-9-002:065 12/09/2014

7

I;

it

.4?u1 ‘

I •ie; ‘1%.

II I. Ift.’

.IIlt I tiTØi

‘, ,,, ,,:‘,,,• Aft

A AflWA I?

Page 27: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

CO

NSE

RV

AT

ION

DIS

TRIC

I' V

IOL

AT

ION

PE

NA

LT

IEs

SCH

ED

UL

E

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

AN

D A

SSE

SSM

EN

T O

F D

AM

AG

ES

TO

PU

BL

IC LAND

OR

NA

TU

RA

L R

ESO

UR

CE

S

r:-1

"��

� f

....

.... r-

!rr--·'1

1

(: I

Q

Sept

embe

r 2009

Re

lati

ng

to

pen

alt

ies f

or

vio

latl

oiiS

wit

hin

the

Co

iiSer

vatl

on

Dis

tric

t

Act

217

TA

BL

E O

F C

ON

TE

NT

S

1 INTR

OD

UC

TIO

N ..

......

-...

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.....

1

2 C

ON

SE

�V

AT

ION

D

ISTR

ICT

V

IOL

AT

ION

P

EN

AL

TIE

S

SC

HED

UL

E G

UIDE

LIN

ES

.....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.....

......

.....

l

2.1

PEN

AL

TY

CA

LC

UL

ATI

ON

......

.....

....

......

.....

....

......

.....

.....

......

......

.....

.. 2

2.1.

1 Id

entifi

ed L

and

Ute

Pea

altie

s ....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

. 3

l.l.

l N

oo-I

deod

fled

Land

Use

Peo

altie

s .....

......

......

.......

.......

.......

......

4

2.1;

3 T

ree R

emov

al ...

.....

....

......

....

......

......

.....

....

......

.. " ...

......

......

......

.... s

1.1.

4 V

egeta

tion

Rem

ovaW

egeta

tion

Cle

arin

g ....

......

......

......

.... -

. .....

5

2.1.

5 A

dditi

onal

Con

side

ratio

ns a

nd F

acto

n ......

.......

......

......

....

.....

... 6

:!.1.6

C

ontin

uing

Vio

latio

ns a

nd P

enni

t NoD

-Com

pliaD

ce ...

.....

......

... 6

2.1.

7 �

-Kind

Pen

altie

s ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

.. 7

2.1.

8 P

enal

ty A

dju

dica

tion

....

.....

......

.....

......

....

.....

....

.....

......

....

.....

......

. 9

3 A

SS

ES

SME

NT

O

F

DAM

AG

ES

T

O

PU

BL

IC

LA

ND

O

R

NA

TU

RA

L R

ES

OU

RC

ES

......

......

......

......

......

.....

...............

.........

.....

lO

3.1

PRIM

AR

YRE

STO

RAT

ION

DA

MA

GE

S ..

....

.....

.....

....

.....

.......

.......

... II

3.2

CO

MPE

NSA

TO

RY

DA

MA

GE

CA

LC

UL

AT

ION

.....

......

......

......

......

12

3.3

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N O

F D

AM

AG

ES ..

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.... l

3

AP

PE

ND

IX A

: GU

IDE

LIN

E F

RA

ME

WO

RK T

AB

LE

S

APP

EN

DIX

B:D

E�

ON

S

AP

PE

ND

IX C

: RE

FER

EN

CE

S

AP

PE

ND

IX D

: DA

MA

GES

EXAM

PL

ES

APP

EN

DIX

E: P

EN

AL

TY

CA

LC

UL

AT

ION

WO

RK

SHEE

T

Page 28: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

1 IN

TR

OD

UC

TIO

N

Haw

aii·

Rev

ised

Sta

tute

s (H

RS)

§18

3C-7

was

am

ende

d on

Jul

y 7,

200

8 to

incr

ease

the

max

imum

pen

alty

for

a C

onse

rvat

ion

Dis

tric

t vio

latio

n to

up

to $

15,0

00 p

er v

iola

tion,

in

addi

tion

to a

dmin

istr

ativ

e co

sts,

cos

ts a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith l

and

or h

abita

t re

stora

tion,

and

dam

ages

to p

ublic

land

or n

atur

al re

sour

ces, o

r any

com

bina

tion

ther

eof.

Thi

s do

cum

ent,

Co

ns

erv

ati

on

D

istr

ict

Vio

lati

on

P

en

alt

ies

S

che

du

le

Gu

ide

lin

es

an

d

Asses

smen

t of D

amag

es to

Publi

c Lan

d and

Natur

al Re

sour

ces i

s in

tend

ed to

pro

vide

the

Offi

ce o

f C

onse

rvat

ion

and

Coa

stal

Lan

ds (

OC

CL)

with

a fr

amew

ork

to s

yste

mat

ical

ly

carry

out

its

enf

orce

men

t po

wer

s, i

n th

e de

term

inat

ion

and

adju

dica

tion

of c

ivil

and

adm

inis

trat

ive

pena

lties

. T

hese

gui

delin

es a

re to

be

used

for i

ntern

al st

aff gu

idan

ce, a

nd

shou

ld

be

peri

odic

ally

re

view

ed

to

dete

rmin

e th

eir

effec

tiven

ess,

an

d w

heth

er

refin

emen

ts a

re n

eede

d. T

hese

gui

delin

es a

re c

onsi

sten

t with

HA

R §

13-1

, Sub

chap

ter 7

,

Civ

il R

esou

rce

Vio

latio

n Sy

stem

(CR

VS)

..

2 C

ON

SE

RV

AT

ION

D

IST

RIC

T

SC

HE

DU

LE

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

VIO

LA

TIO

N

PE

NA

LT

IES

The

cha

rgin

g an

d co

llectin

g of

pen

altie

s is

an

enfo

rcem

ent

tool

that

may

be

used

to

ensu

re fu

ture

com

plia

nce

by t

he r

espo

nsib

le p

arty

and

oth

ers

sim

ilarl

y si

tuat

ed. T

he

pena

lty a

mou

nt(s

) sha

ll be

eno

ugh

to e

nsur

e im

med

iate

com

plia

nce

with

HA

R §

13-5

and

HR

S § 1

83C

, and

ces

satio

n of

ille

gal a

ctiv

ities

. Pe

nalti

es w

ill b

e as

sesse

d fo

r each

act

ion

com

mitt

ed b

y an

indi

vidu

al(s

) tha

t con

duct

s an

una

utho

rize

d lan

d us

e an

d th

at im

pair

s or

dest

roys

nat

ural

res

ourc

es p

rote

cted

und

er C

hapt

er §

183C

, HR

S.

The

Sta

ff w

ill tr

eat ea

ch c

ase

indi

vidu

ally

whe

n as

sign

ing

cons

erva

tion

dist

rict

pena

lties

usin

g th

e fo

llow

ing

fram

ewor

k, a

nd a

dditi

onal

con

side

ratio

ns a

nd f

acto

rs f

or u

pwar

d or

dow

nwar

d ad

just

men

ts.

The

sta

ff o

f th

e O

CC

L (S

taff)

will

use th

ese

pena

lty s

ched

ule

guid

elin

es to

iss

ue v

iola

tion

notic

es a

nd to

mak

e re

com

men

datio

ns to

the

Boa

rd o

f Land

and

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es (B

oard

), C

hairp

erso

n of

the

Boar

d of

Land

and

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

(Cha

irper

son)

, or

Pres

idin

g O

ffice

r, w

hom

may

ulti

mat

ely

adju

dica

te t

he C

onse

rvat

ion

Dis

tric

t pen

altie

s.

Thes

e gu

idel

ines

pres

ume

that

all

cases i

n w

hich

a v

iola

tion

haS

occu

rred

, the

Cha

irper

son,

Boa

rd,

or P

resi

ding

Offi

cer

may

als

o as

sess

adm

inis

trat

ive

cost

s, d

amag

es t

o pu

blic

lan

d or

nat

ural

res

ourc

es,

and

cost

s as

soci

ated

with

lan

d or

habi

tat r

esto

ratio

n.

2.1

PE

NA

LT

Y C

AL

CU

LA

TIO

N

The

pen

alty

range

for t

hese

act

ions

will

be

subs

tant

ially

det

ermin

ed b

ased

on

the

type

cif

perm

it th

at w

ould

hav

e been

requ

ired

if th

e in

divi

dual

(s) b

ad a

pplied

to th

e D

epar

tmen

t

of Lan

d an

d N

atur

al R

esou

rces

(Dep

artm

ent)

or

Boa

rd fo

r pr

e-au

thor

izat

ion

to c

ondu

ct

the

iden

tified

use

, un

der

Haw

aii

Adm

inis

trativ

e R

ules

(HAR

) §1

3-5-

22,

23,

24,

25.

Ass

essi

ng th

e pe

nalti

es a

ccor

ding

to 'th

e C

onser

vatio

n D

istr

ict p

erm

it ty

pe a

ccou

nts

for

the

leve

l of

rev

iew o

r sc

rutin

y th

e un

auth

oriz

ed u

se w

ould

hav

e re

ceiv

ed b

y th

e

Dep

artm

ent o

r B

oard

in o

rder

to a

void

dam

age

to t

he n

atur

al re

sour

ce.

Thi

s gr

adua

ted

perm

it re

view

fram

ewor

k co

rrespond

s to

the

lev

el o

f ac

tual

or

pote

ntia

l "h

ann t

o th

e

resou

rce"

1 caus

ed b

y th

e vi

olat

ion.

Onc

e th

e ba

selin

e fo

r th

e pe

nalty

ran

ge has

'tlee

n es

tabl

ishe

d ac

cord

ing

the

requ

ired

perm

it, th

e pe

nalty

may

be a

djus

ted

appr

opri

atel

y up

war

d or

dow

nwar

d ac

cord

ing

to th

e

''han

n to

reso

urce

" ca

used

or

pote

ntia

lly c

ause

d by

the

viol

ator

's a

ctio

n an

d ad

ditio

nal

cons

ider

atio

ns a

nd fa

ctor

s (S

ee 2

.1.4

),2 w

ithin

the

assi

gned

pen

alty

ran

ge. W

here

Staff

was

una

ble

to as

soci

ate

the

unau

thor

ized

use

with

a ty

pica

l lan

d us

e id

entifi

ed in

HAR

§13-

5, S

taff

may

try to

ass

ocia

te th

e ac

tion

with

the

mos

t si

milar

iden

tified

land

use

in

HA

R §

13-5

, or

acco

rdin

g to

the

''harm

to th

e re

sour

ce"

caus

ed b

y th

e vi

_olat

ion.

Tab

le I

1 ''Hinu t o

resOurce" it

a ICi

ual or

potea

till im

pacl, wb

etber

direc:t or

Uulira:t, lb

orl or

loa.& t

enn,

iwpiCt

oa 1

a.IMnn

l, wJ

tural or

soci

al rsource,

whicb

it apc

c:led to

occur 11

1reaalt o

fuoiU

IJMrized ICf

l ofcoutruct

ioo, Jh

cwcl

iae

altenl

ioo, or

lladscapealt

nlion

(Se

eApp<lldill

B: Dolil

ili01

1s)A

d11J11rd

/ro

m 1'/

f>rldo

/Jtpdrt

...,t

of Envi

ronm

enta

l l'n>te<

tlon1

000 A

dmin

lnm

tl""

Fl1>u

nntl Do

n>nl<

U.

bl/lry.

Ch. tl2

3-U

. 2 P

aully ..U.

.au moy

boldjualel

l vp oc

don, blo

od 011 od

diliCMlll ..

........,..,.,

IOid\ a

lhe lti1IJI

Cllio:n

l oflb

e direct dwl&

a.

sipilk:o

oceo(

.,y

olli

ileiodirecl

illljliCII.II

I�II

ra:onlo

flhe

>iol

-• ..

..,...t-of

>iol-

,dC.(Se

e2.1.4

Additiaouol

Coasl

donlioas 11

114 FICIIft

).

2

Page 29: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

was

cre

ated

to

dem

onst

rate

the

pena

lty ra

nges

for t

he type

of r

equi

red

perm

it an

d "h

arm

to re

sour

ce"

(See

2.1

.1 o

r App

endi

x A

).

The

firs

t tw

o of

the

follo

win

g se

ctio

ns e

xpla

in th

e id

entifi

ed a

nd n

on-i

d�nt

ified

land

use

fram

ewor

k.

The

nex

t fo

ur s

ectio

ns:

Tree

Rem

oval

, A

dditi

onal

Con

side

ratio

ns a

Jid

Fact

ors,

C

ontin

uing

Vio

latio

ns a

nd P

ermit

Non

-Com

plia

nce,

and

In-

Kin

d Pe

nalti

es,

prov

ide

guid

ance

for t

he u

pwar

d or

dow

nwar

d ad

just

men

t of p

enal

ties b

ased

on

the

initi

al

fram

ewor

k di

scus

sed

in S

ectio

n 2.

1.1,

Iden

tified

land

use

pen

altie

s.

2.1.

1 ld

enti

fred

Lan

d U

se P

enal

ties

The

vio

latio

n pe

nalty

ran

ge a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith ea

ch r

equi

red p

ermit

will

be

asse

ssed

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith th

e fo

llow

ing

harm

to re

sour

ce i

ndic

es i

n th

is gr

adua

ted

fram

ewor

k.

Tab

le 1

. Pen

alty

Gui

del

ine

Fra

mew

ork

Maj

or H

arm

to

the

Res

ourc

e/ Boml

Per

mit

(D)

Vio

latio

ns id

entifi

ed w

ith th

e re

quir

ed p

ermit

pref

ix (D

) m

ay in

cur a

pen

alty

ip th

e ran

ge

of $

10,0

00 -

$15,

000

as a

Boa

rd p

erm

it w

ould

hav

e be

en r

equi

red t

o m

inim

ize

the

poss

ibili

ty o

f ca

usin

g "m

ajor

harm

to t

he r

esou

rce.

" E

xam

ples

of"

maj

or h

arm(s

) to

the

reso

urce

" m

ay i

nclu

de a

ctio

ns t

hat

caus

e su

bsta

ntia

l ad

vers

e im

pact

to e

xist

ing

natu

ral

reso

urce

s w

ithin

the

surr

ound

ing

area

, com

mun

ity, e

cosy

stem

or re

gion

, or d

amag

e to

the

exis

ting

phys

ical

and

env

irom;

nent

al a

spec

ts o

f the

land

, suc

h as

nat

ural

bea

uty

and

open

spac

e ch

arac

teri

stic

s.

Such

act

ions

may

inc

lude

, bu

t ar

e no

t lim

ited

to,

unau

thor

ized

sing

le-f

amily

res

iden

ces

or u

naut

hori

zed

stru

ctur

es, gr

adin

g or

alte

ratio

n of

topo

grap

hic

feat

ures

, aq

uacu

lture

, m

ajor

mar

ine

cons

truct

ion

or d

redg

ing,

una

utho

rize

d sh

orel

ine

stru

ctur

es, m

ajor

pro

ject

s of

any

kind

, min

ing

and

extr

actio

n, e

tc.

3

Moderate

Harm to

the Besource

!DepartJnental Per

mit CQ

V

iola

tions

iden

tified

with

the

requ

ired

penn

i! pr

efix

(C) m

ay in

cur a

pen

alty

in th

e ra

nge

of $

2,00

0-$1

0,00

0, as

a D

epar

tmen

tal

perm

it w

ould

hav

e bee

n req

uire

d, d

ue t

o th

e

poss

ibili

ty o

f cau

sing

"mod

erate

har

m to

the

reso

urce

." E

xampl

es o

f"m

oder

ate

harm(s

)

to t

he r

esou

rce"

may

be a

dver

se i

mpa

cts

that

degr

ade

wat

er r

esou

rces

, de

grad

e na

tive

ecos

ystem

s an

d ha

bita

ts, a

nd/o

r al

ter

the

struct

ure

or fu

nctio

n of

a ter

restr

ial,

litto

ral o

r

mar

ine

ecos

yste

m.

Such

act

ions

may

inc

lude

, bu

t are

not

lim

ited t

o, u

naut

hori

zed

land

scap

ing

caus

ing

grou

nd

dist

urba

nce,

un

auth

oriz

ed

alte

ratio

n,

reno

vatio

n or

dem

oliti

on o

f ex

istin

g st

ruct

ures

or

faci

lities

, suc

h as

bui

ldin

gs a

nd s

hore

line

stru

ctur

es,

mai

nten

ance

dred

ging

, agr

icul

ture

, and

ani

mal

hus

band

ry, e

tc.

Minor Han

n to th

e R

esoun;e

/Site

Plan

Aooroval (B)

Penult

Vio

latio

ns id

�ifi

ed w

ith

the

requi

red

perm

it pr

efix

(B) m

ay in

cur p

enal

ties a

s a

site

plan

appr

oval

wou

ld h

ave

been r

equi

red

to a

ssur

e th

at "

min

or h

arm(s

) to

the

res

ourc

e" a

re

min

imiz

ed.

"Min

or h

arm(s

) to

the

reso

urce

" m

ay in

cur

a pen

alty

of $

1,00

0-$2

,000

and

coul

d be

actio

ns c

ausi

ng li

mite

d to

shor

t-te

rm d

irec

t im

pact

s inc

ludi

ng, b

ut n

ot li

mited

to,

smal

l-sca

led

cons

truc

tion,

cons

truc

tion

of a

ccesso

ry s

truct

ures

, ins

talla

tion

of t

empo

rary

or m

inor

sho

relin

e ac

tiviti

es o

r sim

ilar u

ses.

Yen Minor

Harm to

the Resource{

CBl Per

mit

In i

nsta

nces

in

whi

ch a

penn

it w

ith t

he B

pre

fix

shou

ld h

ave

been

sou

ght

but

are

cons

ider

ed t

o ha

ve o

nly

caus

ed "

very m

inor

harm

(s)

to r

esou

rce"

a p

enal

ty o

f up

to

$1,0

00 m

ay b

e in

curr

ed.

Thes

e "ve

ry m

inor

harm

(s)

to th

e res

ourc

e" c

ould

be a

ctio

ns in

whi

ch t

he i

mpa

ct 0

11 th

e w

ater

res

ourc

e or

terr

estr

ial,

litto

ral

or m

arin

e ec

osys

tem

was

tem

pora

ry o

r in

sign

ifica

nt,

and

was

not

of

a su

bsta

ntia

l na

ture

eith

er i

ndiv

idua

lly o

r

cum

ulat

ivel

y.

2.1.

2 N

on-I

den

tifi

ed L

and

Use

Pen

alti

es

Vio

latio

ns in

whi

ch a

n un

auth

oriz

ed u

se is

not

iden

tified

in H

AR §

13-5

-22,

23,

24,

25,

Staff

may

try to

asso

ciat

e th

e ac

tion

with

the

mos

t si

milar

ide

ntifi

ed l

and

use

in H

AR

4

Page 30: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

§ 13-

5 or

acc

ordi

ng to

the

"har

m t

o th

e re

sour

ce"

caus

ed b

y th

e vi

olat

ion.

Ref

er to

the

abov

e se

ctio

n, Id

entifi

ed La

nd U

se Pe

nalti

es, fo

r the

mos

t sim

ilar r

equi

red

perm

it pr

efix.

To

cate

goriz

e th

e vi

olat

ion

as a

"ha

rm to

res

ourc

e" w

hen

no s

imila

r us

e is

iden

tified

in

HA

R §

13-5

, Sta

ff w

ill re

fer to

Tab

le I

and

the

defin

ition

s of

the

four

vio

latio

n ty

pes o

f

"har

m to

reso

urce

" (S

ee A

ppen

dix

B: D

efini

tions

).

2.1.

3 T

ree

Rem

oval

Vio

latio

n pe

nalti

es fo

r th

e re

mov

al o

f any

fede

ral o

r st

ate

liste

d th

reaten

ed, e

ndan

gered

,

or c

omm

erci

ally

val

uabl

e tre

e m

ay i

ncur

a fi

ne o

f up

to $

15,0

00 per

tree

. R

emov

al o

f

any

nativ

e tree

may

incu

r a

fine

of u

p to

$1,

000

per

tree.

The

rem

oval

of a

ny in

vasiv

e

tree s

hall

be co

nside

red as

remov

al/cl

eari

ng of

vege

tatio

n.

The

Boa

rd,

Dep

artm

ent,

or P

resi

ding

Offi

cer

also

has

the

opt

ion

of c

onsi

deri

ng t

he

rem

oval

of

mor

e th

an o

ne t

ree

as a

sin

gle

viol

atio

n, s

imila

r to

the

rem

oval

/cle

arin

g of

vege

tatio

n.3

If v

iola

tion

is co

nsid

ered

as

one

viol

atio

n, a

fine

am

ount

of u

p to

$15

,000

may

be

incu

rred

, util

izin

g th

e gu

idel

ines

for

Maj

or, M

oder

ate,

Min

or, a

nd V

ery M

inor

outli

ned

in th

is sc

hedu

le.

How

ever

, the

rem

oval

of a

ny fe

dera

lly o

r sta

te li

sted

thre

aten

ed

or e

ndan

gere

d tr

ee s

hall

be c

onsi

dere

d on

a o

ne v

iola

tion

per tr

ee b

asis

, with

a m

axim

um

pena

lty o

f up

to $

15,0

00 p

er tr

ee.

2.1.

4 V

eget

ation

Rem

oval/

Veg

etati

on C

lear

ing

Past

Sta

ff re

com

men

datio

ns a

nd B

oard

dec

isio

ns h

ave

trea

ted s

ome

cases

of

tree

or

rem

oval

as o

ne c

itatio

n of

veg

etat

ion

clea

ring

/veg

etat

ion

rem

oval

, thi

s pr

actic

e m

ay b

e

cont

inue

d in

:vio

latio

ns r

esul

ting

in m

inor

or

very

min

or .h

arm t

o th

e res

ourc

e. In

acco

rdan

ce w

ith th

e id

entifi

ed la

nd u

ses

with

in H

AR

§ 13

-5 th

e as

sessm

ent o

f veg

etat

ion

rem

oval

bas

bee

n ba

sed

on a

sin

gle

cita

tion

of're

mov

allc

learin

g de

term

ined

by

the

squa

re

foot

age

of v

eget

atio

n re

mov

ed (

See

Tab

le 3

V

eget

atio

n R

emov

al).

How

ever

, th

e

' Wb

ile

SlaiT

•d

lloanl d

oci�o

us in

MA-0

1-09, OA

-OS�

O aod

114-06-

08 h

ove !r

Olled

!be

removal

of n

oa ..

llli.e,

lnwsi

v<, or

oox.io

us 1r

ces as

one

citati

oo of

"cle.-

ina" wi

lh m

and

mory

reaned

iaio

a pl

ans

.

5

Dep

artm

ent

may

see

fit

to a

sses

s th

e rem

oval

/cle

arin

g of

thr

eate

ned,

enda

nger

ed,

or

com

mer

cial

ly v

alua

ble

plan

ts si

mila

r to

the

mod

ified

tree

rem

oval fr

amew

ork

and

may

be

pena

lized

on

an in

divi

dual

plan

t bas

is o

f up

to $

15,0

00 p

er p

lant

.

Tab

le 3

. V

eget

ation

Rem

oval

Note:

Tho cl

earing of

thteatalod, endoni

ered or

eomm

... cial

ly val

uable

planll wi

D be od

dreaed

on a

case-by.cue

basis.

but �

dina on

!be imporion

c:eofll

lespeciec m

ay Incu

r apen

lltyof

up to

SIS

,OOO P"'

PIInL

Accordina

lo T

able

2, the

clearing

ofvepea

tion ma

y incur a

penalty

of up

to $

1/ sq.

ft., as

clearing

10,00

0 sq.ft.

Slalf

could asaes

s a penal

ty of

$10,00

0.

2.1.

5 A

dditi

onal

Con

side

rati

ons

and

Fac

ton

Afte

r St

aff a

pplie

s th

e C

onserva

tion

Dis

trict

vio

latio

n gr

adua

ted p

enal

ty fr

amew

ork

to

iden

tify th

e vi

olat

ion

penal

ty'ran

ge (1

, 2, a

nd 3

foun

d abo

ve),

the

Staff

may

inc

orpo

rate

seve

ral c

onsi

dera

tions

into

the

final

ass

essed

cons

erva

tion

dist

rict p

enal

ty in

clud

ing

but

not

limite

d to

, th

ose

fact

ors i

dent

ified

in

HA

R §

13-1

-70

Adm

inis

trativ

e Sa

nctio

ns

Sched

ule;

Fac

tors

to b

e C

onsi

dered

.

2.1.

6 C

onti

nui

ng

Vio

lati

ons

and

Per

mit

Non

-Com

plia

nce

Eac

h da

y du

ring

whi

ch a

par

ty co

ntin

ues t

o w

ork

or o

therw

ise

cont

inue

s to

vio

late

cons

erva

tion

distr

ict

law

s, an

d aft

er, t

he D

epar

tmen

t has

inf

orm

ed t

he v

iola

tor

of t

he

offen

se b

y ve

rbal

or

writ

ten

notifi

catio

n, th

e pa

rty m

ay be

pen

aliz

ed u

p to

$15

,000

per

day

(pen

altie

s fo

r eve

ry d

ay il

lega

l act

ions

con

tinue

) by

the

Departm

ent f

or ea

ch s

epar

ate

offen

se.

4 ProvidD:J

lbe

bann

toth

e�

llld o

l!Dlc

damqe

werem.

iAim

ll.

6

Page 31: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

Viol

atio

n of

exi

stin

g ap

prov

ed C

onse

rvat

ion

Dis

tric

t Use

Perm

it (C

DU

P) c

ondi

tions

will

be a

sses

sed

on a

cas

e-by

-cas

e ba

sis.

Exi

stin

g pe

rmit

viol

atio

ns, i

n w

hich

dea

dlin

es a

re

not

met

, m

ay b

e in

divi

dual

ly

asse

ssed

by

the

Staff

as

to p

rior

vio

lato

r co

nduc

t,

know

ledg

e, a

nd c

ompl

ianc

e.

Vio

latio

n of

perm

it co

nditi

ons

invo

lvin

g in

itiat

ion

and/

or

com

plet

ion

of p

roje

ct c

onst

ruct

ion,

not

ifica

tion

of s

tart

and

com

plet

ion

dates

, fai

lure

to

file

lega

l do

cum

ents

, etc

., m

ay b

e co

nsid

ered

ver

y m

inor

with

in th

e ex

istin

g fr

amew

ork,

alth

ough

it s

houl

d be

not

ed th

at s

uch

actio

ns m

ay res

ult i

n perm

it re

voca

tion.

Fai

lure

to

pe,-f

orm p

rope

r cu

ltura

l, ar

cheo

logi

cal,

or e

nvir

onm

enta

l im

pact

stu

dies

or

failu

re t

o

impl

emen

t pr

oper

bes

t m

anag

emen

t pra

ctic

es a

s id

entifi

ed i

n th

e st

anda

rd p

erm

it

cond

ition

s m

ay b

e as

sess

ed m

ore

seve

rely

by

Staff

, as

a m

oder

ate

or m

ajor

har

m to

the

reso

urce

, du

e to

the

pot

entia

l of

gre

ater

adv

erse

im

pact

s to

natu

ral

reso

urces

from

the

viol

ator

's fa

ilure

to c

ompl

y w

ith th

e pe

rmit

cond

ition

s, m

ay h

ave

occu

rred

.

2.1.

7 In

-Kin

d P

enal

ties

Onc

e th

e pe

nalty

am

ount

has

bee

n es

tabl

ishe

d th

roug

h th

e fra

mew

ork

abov

e, t

he

Dep

artm

ent m

ay d

eterm

ine

that

the

full

paym

ent

or s

ome

porti

on o

f the

pen

alty

may

be

paid

as

an in

-kin

d pe

nalty

pro

ject

.5 T

his

wou

ld n

ot s

erve

as

a w

ay to

avo

id p

aymen

t but

as a

way

to r

educ

e th

e ca

sh a

mou

nt o

wed

whi

le a

llow

ing

the

Dep

artm

ent t

o co

nsis

tent

ly

enfo

rce

its ru

les.

The

in-k

ind

pena

lty p

roje

ct i

s no

t de

sign

ed t

o cr

edit

the

viol

ator

for

resto

ratio

n or

rem

edia

tion

effor

ts th

at m

ay be

alrea

dy r

equi

red,

but

to o

ffset

a p

ortio

n of

the

cash

pen

alty

ass

esse

d.

The

in-k

ind

pena

lty· s

houl

d be

eno

ugh t

o en

sure

futu

re

com

plia

nce

with

HA

R §

13-5

and

HR

S § 1

83C

, by

the

viol

ator

and

to d

eter

oth

er p

oten

tial

viol

ator

s fr

om n

on-c

ompl

ianc

e.

In-k

ind

pena

lties

wiii

onl

y be

con

side

red

if (

I) t

he r

espo

nsib

le p

arty

is

a go

vernm

ent

entit

y, s

uch

as a

'fed

eral

age

ncy,

sta

te a

genc

y, c

ount

y ag

ency

, city

age

ncy,

uni

vers

ity, o

r

scho

ol b

oard

, or i

f (2)

the

resp

onsi

ble

part

y is

a pr

ivat

e pa

rty

prop

osin

g an

env

iron

men

tal

'ln�

l(jnd

Penal1

y Jhmework

has be

en adapted

ltont

Plori

da Dep

artmtn

l ofED

vinmmcn

t&l Prot

eclioa

. 2007

. ProJnan D

irective

923,

SeUle

ment e

uidcll

om Jbr

civd

tod l(

huinistnt

ive pco

Dlties

.

7

resto

ratio

n, e

nhan

cem

ent,

info

rmat

ion,

or ed

ucat

ion

proj

ect.

ln"k

ind

pena

lties

are

lim

ited

to th

e fo

llow

ing

spec

ific

optio

ns:

a.

Mat

eria

l an

d/or

la

bor

supp

ort

for

envi

ron

men

tal

enha

nce

men

t or

rest

orati

on p

roje

cts.

Th

e D

epar

tmen

t w

ill g

ive

pref

eren

ce t

o in

-kind

proj

ects

ben

efiti

ng p

ropo

sed g

overnm

ent-

spon

sore

d en

viro

nmen

tal

proj

ects

.

For

shor

elin

e vi

olat

ions

, thi

s m

ay in

clud

e st

ate

beac

h no

uris

hmen

t pr

ojec

ts

and

dune

resto

ratio

n pr

ojec

ts.

b.

En

viro

nm

enta

l In

form

ation

and

En

viro

nm

enta

l Edu

cati

on p

roje

cts.

Any

info

rmat

ion

or

educ

atio

n pr

ojec

t pr

opos

ed

mus

t dem

onstr

ate

how

th

e

info

rmat

ion

or ed

ucat

ion

proj

ect w

ill d

irec

tly e

nhan

ce th

e D

epar

tmen

t's,

and

pref

erab

ly

the

OC

CL

's,

mis

sion

to

pr

otec

t an

d co

nser

ve

Haw

aii'

s

Con

serva

tion

Dis

trict

Land

s.

c. C

apit

al o

r F

acil

ity

Impr

ovem

ents

. An

y ca

pita

l or

faci

lity

impr

ovem

ent

proj

ect

propo

sed

mus

t de

mon

stra

te h

ow

the

impr

ovem

ent

will

dir

ectly

enha

nce

the

Dep

artm

ent'

s an

d/or

pub

lic's

use

, acc

ess,

or

ecol

ogic

al v

alue

of

the

cons

ervatio

n pr

oper

ty.

d.

Pro

pert

y. A

resp

onsi

ble

part

y m

ay p

ropo

se to

don

ate

land

to th

e de

partm

ent

as a

n in

-kin

d pe

nalty

. Don

atio

ns w

ill b

e han

dled

by

the

Dep

artm

ent'

s L

egacy

Lands

pro

gram

or s

imila

r pro

gram

. 8

Page 32: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

2.1.

8 P

enal

� A

dju

dica

tion

Vio

lati

on p

enal

ties

may

be

adju

dica

ted

sim

ilar

ly t

o th

e ha

rm t

o re

sour

ce i

ndic

es i

n th

e

pena

lty g

uide

line

fram

ewor

k.

· 1'/§

.,; to

Rc

ifi.,d

IAncl

n�"'

;;-n

tl�Rahl!e

Maj

or

S\0

,000

-$\5

,000

B

oard

Mod

erat

e �2

,000

-$1

0,00

0 !B

oard

Min

or

�I ,0

00-$

2,0

00

Chair

perso

n or P

resid

ing

Offi

cer

Ver

y M

inor

u

p to

$1,

000

�hai

rper

son

or P

resi

ding

O

ffice

r

Maj

or a

nd

Mod

erat

e H

arm

to

tbe

Res

ourc

e

I

The

Boa

rd m

ay a

djud

icat

e pe

nalti

es t

o vi

olat

ions

cate

gori

zed a

s ca

usin

g or

pot

entia

lly

caus

ing

maj

or o

r m

oder

ate

hann

(s)

to t

he r

esou

rce.

Th

e B

oard

may

als

o ad

judi

cate

cas

es

in w

)lich

rep

eat

viol

atio

ns,

repe

at v

iola

tors

, or

egr

egio

us b

ehav

ior

wer

e in

volv

ed,

or

mod

erat

e to

sign

ifica

nt a

ctua

l har

m t

o 'th

e re

sour

ce o

ccurr

ed.

The

Boa

rd m

ay a

lso

adju

dica

te th

e pa

ymen

t of

par

t or

all,

of t

he p

enal

ty a

s pa

rt o

f an I

n-ki

nd p

enal

ty.

Min

or a

nd

Ver

y M

inor

Har

m t

o th

e R

esou

rce

The

Boa

rd m

ay d

eleg

ate

to t

he C

hair

pers

on o

r a

Pre

sidi

ng O

fficer

the

pow

er to

ren

der

a

fina

l dec

isio

n in

min

or a

nd v

ery

min

or. c

onse

rvat

ion

dist

rict

vio

lati

ons

in o

rder

to p

rovi

de

expe

diti

ous

proc

essi

ng an

d ea

st e

ffec

tive

res

olut

ion.

Th

e C

hair

pers

on o

r ap

poin

ted

Pre

sidi

ng

Offi

cer

may

ad

judi

cate

pe

nalti

es

to

min

or

and

very

m

inor

vi

olat

ions

char

acte

rize

d b

y in

adve

rten

t or

uni

nten

tion

al v

iola

tion

s an

d th

ose

viol

atio

ns w

hich

caus

ed m

inor

or

very

min

or h

ann to

the

res

ourc

e.

9

3 A

SS

ES

SME

NT

O

F

DA

MA

GE

S

TO

P

UBL

.IC

LAND

O

R

NA

TURAL

RES

OU

RC

ES

Pen

alti

es t

o re

coup

dam

ages

to

publ

ic l

ands

or

natu

ral

resou

rces

for

the

purp

oses

of

enfo

rcem

ent

and

remed

iati

on m

ay be

asses

sed

in a

ddit

ion

to C

onse

rvat

ion

Dis

tric

t

viol

atio

n pe

nalti

es as

sessed b

y th

e af

orem

enti

oned

gui

delin

es.

The

asses

sed

tota

l va

lue

of t

he i

niti

al a

nd i

nter

im n

atur

al r

esou

rce(

s) d

amag

ed o

r lo

st (

com

pens

ator

y da

mag

es)

and

the

cost

of

resto

rati

on o

r rep

lacem

ent

of th

e da

mag

ed n

atur

al r

esou

rce(

s) (

prim

ary

resto

ratio

n co

st)

alon

g w

ith a

ny o

ther

app

ropr

iate

fact

ors,

incl

udin

g th

ose

naoied

in H

AR

§13-

1-70

, may

be

adju

dica

ted

by

the

Boa

rd. T

he

tota

l va

lue

may

be

esti

mat

ed o

n a

per

annu

m b

asis

, an

d th

en m

ay be

used

to

calc

ulat

e tl!

e ne

t pr

esen

t va

lue

of th

e in

itia

l an

d

inte

rim

loss

of

natu

ral

reso

urce

ben

efits

, un

til t

he ec

osys

tem

str

uctu

re,

func

tion,

and

/or

serv

ices

arc

resto

red.

The

cost

of

a

full-

scal

e da

mag

e as

sessm

ent

by

the

Dep

artm

ent

wou

ld

be ·

an

adm

inis

trat

ive

cost

, w

hich

cou

ld b

e re

coup

ed b

y th

e B

oard

from

the

lan

dow

ner

or

offen

der

purs

uant

§H

RS

183

C-7

. 'In

som

e cases

, th

e da

mag

e to

pub

lic l

ands

or

natu

ral

reso

urces

may

occur

on

mor

e than

one

ecos

ystem

or

habi

tat t

ype,

(e.

g.,

sand

y bea

ches

,

seagr

ass b

eds,

and

cor

al r

eefs

). I

n su

ch in

stan

ces, d

amag

es f

or a

ll im

pact

ed s

yste

ms

wil

l

be h

andl

ed c

umul

ativ

ely.

Sinc

e al

l th

e ec

osys

tem

ser

vice

s pr

ovid

ed b

y th

e ec

osys

tem

in

ques

tion

can

not

be

quan

tifi

ed (

e.g.

, the

aes

thet

ic v

alue

), th

e va

lues

obt

ained

are

low

er b

ound

esti

mat

es, a

nd

may

be a

ppli

ed to

sys

tems

sim

ilar to

the

refer

enced

eco

system

usi

ng th

e b

enefi

t tra

nsfe

r

met

hod.

Thes

e vB!

uati

ons,

to

acco

unt f

or t

he l

oss

of ec

osys

tem s

ervic

es a

nd t

he c

ost

to

rest

ore

them

, may

be a

ppli

ed to

Haw

aiia

n ec

osys

tems

on p

ublic

lan

ds: s

uch

as K

oa a

nd

Ohi

a fo

rest

s, c

oral r

eefs

, sea

gras

s beds

, wet

land

s, d

une

and

beach

ecos

ystem

s, an

d ot

her

impo

rtan

t Haw

aiian

eco

syst

ems.

Whi

le ea

ch c

ase

is u

niqu

e an

d in

divi

dual

in

natu

re, t

he D

epar

tmen

t m

ay n

ot b

e ab

le t

o

cond

uct

deta

iled

dam

age

asses

smen

ts i

n ea

ch c

ase,

and

may

ref

er t

o pa

st p

rece

dent

,

\0

Page 33: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

econ

omic

ec

osys

tem

va

luat

ions

, an

d ot

her

publ

ishe

d en

viro

nmen

tal

valu

atio

ns

to

esti

mat

e an

d as

sess

dam

ages

on

sm

alle

r sc

ales

(fo

r va

luat

ions

and

publ

icat

ion

exam

ples

see

App

endi

x C

: R

efer

ence

s an

d A

ppen

dix

D:

Dam

ages

Exa

mpl

es).

Usi

ng t

he b

enefi

t

'tran

sfer

met

hod

to a

pply

pas

t pr

eced

ents

and

pub

lishe

d va

luat

ions

in

som

e si

tuat

ions

wou

ld a

llow

the

Dep

artm

ent

to f

ocus

its

adm

inis

trat

ive

duti

es a

nd t

ime

on r

emed

iati

on

and

rest

orat

ion

effor

ts.

How

ever

, as

eco

logi

cal

valu

atio

n an

d re

sear

ch c

onti

nue,

mor

e

com

preh

ensi

ve e

stim

ates

may

be

prod

uced

and

uti

lized.

The

Boa

rd m

ay a

llow

res

tora

tion

act

ivit

ies a

nd d

amag

e pe

nalti

es t

o be

con

duct

ed a

nd/o

r

appl

ied

to a

sit

e di

ffer

ent fr

om t

he l

ocat

ion

of t

he d

amag

ed a

rea

whe

re s

imila

r ph

ysic

al,

biol

ogic

al a

nd /

or c

ultu

ral

func

tion

s ex

ist.

Thes

e as

sesse

d da

mages

are

ind

epen

dent

of

othe

r, c

ity,

cou

nty,

sta

te a

nd f

eder

al r

egul

atory

dec

isio

ns a

nd a

djud

icat

ions

. T

hus,

the

mon

etar

y. re

med

ies

prov

ided

in H

RS

§ 18

3C-7

are

cum

ulat

ive

and

in a

ddit

ion

to a

ny o

ther

rem

edie

s al

low

ed b

y la

w.

3.1

PR

IMA

RY

RE

ST

OR

AT

ION

DA

MA

GE

S

The

cos

t of

land

or

habi

tat

rest

orat

ion

or re

plac

emen

t, th

e co

st o

f si

te m

onito

ring

, and

site

man

agem

ent

may

be

asse

ssed

and

cha

rged

as

prim

ary

resto

rati

on d

amag

es.

Res

tora

tion

effor

ts w

ill

aim

to

retu

rn t

he d

amag

ed e

cosy

stem

to

a si

mil

ar ec

olog

ical

stru

ctur

e an

d

func

tion

that

exi

sted

pri

or to

the

viol

atio

n. In

cas

es in

whi

ch th

e da

mag

ed ec

osys

tem

was

pred

omin

atel

y co

mpo

sed

of

non-

nati

ve s

p�ie

s, r

esto

rati

on e

ffor

ts m

ust

re-v

eget

ate

Con

serv

atio

n D

istr

ict

land

and

pub

lic la

nds

wit

h no

n-in

vasi

ve s

pecie

s, p

refe

rabl

y na

tive

and

ende

mic

spec

ies w

hen

poss

ible

. T

he u

se o

f na

tive

and

end

emic

spec

ies m

ay t

hus

resul

t in

the

res

tora

tion

of

ecol

ogic

al s

truc

ture

and

func

tion

cri

tica

l fo

r th

e su

rviv

al o

f

ende

mic

Haw

aiia

n sp

ecie

s.

Re!

umin

g th

e da

mag

ed a

nd o

r se

vere

ly d

egra

ded

site

to

a co

ndit

ion

sim

ilar

to o

r be

tter

than

its

prev

ious

eco

logi

cal s

truc

ture

and

func

tion

(e.

g., a

terres

tria

l sys

tem

suc

h as

a K

oa

(Aca

cia

koa)

for

est)

wou

ld i

nclu

de:

(I)

calc

ulat

ing

the

leve

l of

ecos

yste

m s

ervi

ces t

o be

rest

ored

from

car

bon

sequ

estr

atio

n, c

lim

ate

regu

lati

on,

nutr

ient

cyc

ling,

air

and

wat

er

puri

fica

tion,

ero

sion

con

trol

, pl

ant

and/

or w

ildlif

e ha

bita

t, an

d an

y ot

her

serv

ices

whi

ch

II

may

be

valu

ed;

(2)

purc

hase

, pr

oduc

tion

and

out

-pla

ntin

g of

Koa

see

dlin

gs;

and

(3)

mon

itori

ng,

mai

nten

ance

, and

man

agem

ent f

or t

he ti

me

peri

od o

f m

atur

e gr

owth

of -40

-

60 y

ears

, to

achi

eve

mat

ure

cano

py s

truc

ture

, nat

ive

unde

r-st

ory, and

an

acce

pta�

le le

vel

oflo

st ec

osys

tem

stru

ctur

e, fu

ncti

on an

d/or

ser

vices

res

tore

d.

3.2

CO

MP

EN

SAT

OR

Y D

AM

AG

E C

AL

CUL

AT

ION

Com

pens

atory

dam

ages

to p

ublic

land

s or

nat

ural

reso

urces

may

be

asse

ssed

and

cha

rged

to

the

viol

ator

to

co

mpe

nsat

e fo

r ec

osys

tem

da

mag

e an

d lo

st

initi

al

and

inte

rim

ecos

ystem

serv

ices

to

the

publ

ic.

All

Div

isio

ns o

f th

e D

epar

tmen

t m

ay c

oord

inat

e th

eir

reso

urces

and

eff

orts

alo

ng w

ith

exis

ting

eco

syst

em v

alua

tion

s an

d pu

blic

atio

ns (

See

App

endi

x C

and

D f

or e

xampl

es)

to d

eriv

e th

e es

tim

ated

tot

al v

alue

of

the

natu

ral

reso

urce

dam

aged

unt

il th

e ec

osys

tem

stru

ctur

e, fu

ncti

on, a

nd s

ervi

ces a

re e

stim

ated

to b

e

·reco

vere

d.

Ute

tota

l val

ue o

f th

e na

tura

l res

ourc

e th

at i

s lo

st o

r da

mag

ed m

ay i

nclu

de th

e in

itia

l and

inte

rim

val

ues o

f the

ecos

yste

m s

ervi

ces

prov

ided

by

the

natu

ral r

esou

rce

or h

abit

at, an

d

the

socia

l-ec

onom

ic v

alue

of

the

degr

aded

sit

e, u

ntil

the

ecos

yste

m s

truc

ture

, fu

ncti

on,

andi

or s

ervi

ces are

res

tored

. A

sses

sing

the

dam

ages

to

the

reso

urce

cou

ld i

nclu

de:

esti

mat

ing

the

loss

of

ecos

ystem

ser

vice

s of

car

bon

seque

stra

tion

, cl

imat

e re

gula

tion

,

nutr

ient

cyc

ling,

pla

nt a

nd/o

r w

ildlif

e ha

bita

t, bi

odiv

ersi

ty,

air

and

wai

er p

urifi

cati

on,

eros

ion

cont

rol,

coas

tal

prot

ecti

on,

the

loss

of

bene

fits

to

tour

ism

, fi

sher

ies,

socie

ty,

cult

ural

insp

irat

ion

and

prac

tices

, and

any

oth

er s

ervi

ces w

hich

may

be

valu

ed.

Thes

e na

tura

l res

ourc

e da

mag

es m

ay b

e as

sesse

d us

ing

econ

omic

val

uati

on t

echn

ique

s to

esti

mat

e th

e. t

otal

val

ue(s

) of

the

nat

ural

res

ourc

e(s)

dam

aged

on

a pe

r ar

ea b

asis

,

incl

udin

g: t

otal

ecos

yste

m s

ervi

ce v

alue

, to

tal

annu

al b

enefi

ts,

the

mar

ket

valu

e of

the

natu

ral

reso

urce

, or

any

oth

er fa

ctor

dee

med

app

ropr

iate

. The

tota

l va

lue

of t

he p

resen

t

and

inte

rim

nat

ural

res

ourc

e da

mag

e m

ay b

e es

tim

ated

by

calc

ulat

ing

the

net.

pres

ent

valu

e of

thes

e lo

st b

enefi

ts, v

alues

and

serv

ices

. The

net

pre

sent

val

ue m

ay be

cal

cula

ted

usin

g a

disc

ount

rat

e to

sca

le t

he p

resen

t an

d fu

ture

cos

ts t

o th

e pu

blic

, of

the

int

erim

loss

es o

f ec

osys

tem

ser

vices

ove

r th

e res

tora

tion

tim

e.

The

res

tora

tion

tim

e m

ay b

e

12

Page 34: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

esti

mat

ed a

s th

e nu

mbe

r of

yea

rs f

or t

he d

amage

d na

tura

l re

sour

ce o

r ec

osys

tem

to

reach

mat

urit

y an

d/or

the

eco

syst

em s

truc

ture

and

func

tion

to

be r

esto

red

sim

ilar

to

the

pre­

viol

atio

n st

ate.

T

he d

isco

unt

of fu

ture

los

ses

and

accr

ued be

nefi

ts m

ay b

e us

ed i

n th

e

valu

atio

n of

mit

igat

ion

effor

ts p

erfo

rmed

by

the

viol

ator

. F

or e

xam

ple

the

resto

rati

on

cond

ucted

imm

edia

tely

aft

er d

amag

e oc

curr

ed m

ay b

e ca

lcul

ated

to h

ave

a hi

gher

pre

sent

bene

fit

wor

th t

han

the

bene

fit

of r

esto

rati

on a

ctiv

itie

s un

dert

aken

a y

ear

or t

wo

late

r.

In o

ther

ins

tanc

es,

a ha

bita

t eq

uiva

lenc

y an

alys

is (

HE

A)

or a

res

ourc

e eq

uiva

lenc

y

anal

ysis

(RE

A)

may

be

used

to

scal

e eq

uiva

lent

hab

itat

or

wild

life

loss

es f

or e

stim

atin

g

both

eco

syst

em d

amag

e pe

nalt

ies

and

resto

rati

on e

ffor

ts.

3.3

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N O

F D

AM

AG

ES

The

adj

udic

atio

n of

pri

mar

y res

tora

tion

dam

ages

and

com

pens

ator

y da

mag

es w

ill b

e

adju

dica

ted

by t

he B

oard

due

to

the

com

plex

ity

of t

he a

sses

smen

t proc

ess

and

to a

ssur

e

prop

er c

heck

s an

d ba

lanc

es, i

nclu

ding

ade

quat

e pu

blic

not

ice

and

a pu

blic

hea

ring

.

In a

ddit

ion

to t

he d

amag

es a

nd p

enal

ty v

iola

tion

s as

sess

ed,

the

Dep

artm

ent

is a

llow

ed t

o

reco

up a

ll ad

min

istr

ativ

e co

sts

asso

ciat

ed w

ith

the

alle

ged v

iola

tion

pur

suan

t to

HRS

§18

3C-7

(b).

A

ll pe

nalt

ies

asse

ssed

wil

l be

in c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith

HRS

§18

3C-7

(c)

and

wil

l

not

proh

ibit

an

y pe

rson

fro

m e

xerc

isin

g na

tive

Haw

aiia

n ga

ther

ing

righ

ts o

rtr

adit

iona

l

cult

ural

pra

ctic

es.

AP

PE

ND

IX A

: G

UID

EL

INE

FR

AM

EW

OR

K T

ABL

ES

Tab

le 1

. Pen

alty

Gu

idel

ine

Fra

mew

ork

13

Tab

le 2

. V

eget

ation

Rem

oval

• "

•-"'

Ro•

nnrr

• IP

on'ol

tv R

onoo

�om

oval of

more

than

!Mi

ior

1510,00

0.$15,00

0 10,

000 sq

. ft.

!Remova

l ofV

ego:IAiion

.or of

M

oderate

!n,OO

O-S I 0,00

0 ,00

0-1 0,00

0 sq. II

of ve

getati

on

Remova

l of los

s than 2,00

0 sq. ft

. �

inor

s 1,00

0-$2,00

0 �

elation

tearing

oflnv

aaive

or no

xious

r.'eryMinor

· '-'

pto S

\,000

egetati

on

Note:

Acco

nlina

to Tab

le 2,

the cl

eoring of

vecetati

on ma

y mcm

a penalty

of up

to $1

1 sq. II.

, as cl

eoring I 0

,000

sq. ft.

Staff could

asses

s a penal

ty of

$10,00

0. The clearing

of threaten

ecl, endonpred

or co

iiiiMI'Cially valuab

le plan

ts, wil

l be ad

dressed on a ..

..,.by-<aSe

basis, bu

t depalding on

the im

potllnce of

the spec

ies ma

y incur a

penalty

ofup to

$15,

000 per

plant

Page 35: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

AP

PE

ND

IX B

: DE

FIN

ITIO

NS

Def

init

ions

:

(I)

"Bas

elin

e" m

eans

the

orig

inal

leve

l of s

ervi

ces p

rovi

ded

by th

e da

mag

ed re

sour

ce.

(2)

"Ben

efit

Tra

nsfe

r M

etho

d" e

stim

ates

eco

nom

ic v

alues

by

tran

sferr

ing

exis

ting

bene

fit e

stim

ates

from

stu

dies

alre

ady

com

plet

ed fo

r ano

ther

loca

tion

or is

sue?

( 3)

"Boa

rd"

mea

ns th

e Boa

rd o

f Lan

d an

d N

atur

al R

esou

rces

.

(4)

"Boa

rd P

ermit"

mea

ns a

perm

it ap

prov

ed b

y th

e B

oard

of

Land

and

Natu

ral

Res

ourc

es.

(5)

"Cha

irpe

rson

" m

eans

the

chai

rper

son

of th

e bo

ard

of la

nd a

nd n

atur

al re

sour

ces

(6)

"Civ

il R

esou

rce

Vio

latio

ns S

yste

m"

or "

CR

VS"

mea

ns a

sys

tem

of a

dmin

istr

ativ

e

law

pro

ceed

ings

as a

utho

rized

und

er c

hapt

er 1

99D

, H

RS,

and

furth

er p

rescr

ibed

in

Subc

hapt

er 7

, 13-

1, H

AR, f

or th

e pu

rpos

e of

pro

cess

ing

civi

l res

ourc

e vi

olat

ions

.

(7)

''Com

pens

ator

y D

amag

es"

mea

ns d

amag

es fo

r co

mpe

nsat

ion

for

the·

inte

rim

loss

of e

cosy

stem

ser

vice

s to

the

publ

ic p

rior

to fu

ll re

cove

ry.

(8)

"Con

tested

Cas

e" m

eans

a

proc

eedi

ng i

n w

hich

the

leg

al r

ight

s, d

utie

s, o

r

priv

ilege

s of

spe

cif1c

par

ties a

re re

quir

ed b

y la

w to

be

dete

rmin

ed aft

er a

n op

portun

ity fo

r

an a

genc

y he

arin

g.

(9)

"Dep

artm

ent"

mea

ns th

e D

epar

tmen

t of La

nd a

nd N

atur

al R

esou

rces

.

(10)

"D

epar

tmen

tal P

erm

it" m

eans

a p

erm

it ap

prov

ed b

y th

e C

hairp

erso

n.

(II)

"Dis

coun

ting"

mea

ns a

n ec

onom

ic p

roce

dure

that

wei

ghts

pas

t and

futu

re b

enefi

ts

or c

osts

suc

h th

at th

ey ar

e co

mpa

rabl

e w

ith p

resen

t ben

efits

and

cos

ts.

( 12)

"Eco

syst

em S

ervi

ces"

mea

ns n

atur

al r

esou

rces

and

eco

syst

em p

roces

ses,

whi

ch

may

be

valu

ed a

ccor

ding

to th

eir b

enefi

ts to

hum

anki

nd.

For

exa

mpl

e: c

arbo

n se

ques

trat

ion,

cli

mat

e re

gula

tion

, nu

trie

nt cy

clin

g,

pla

nt a

nd/o

r w

ildl

ife

habi

tat,

biod

iver

sity

, ai

r an

d w

ater

purifi

cati

on.

eros

ion

cont

rol,

coas

tal

prot

ecti

on,

the

loss

of

benefi.

ts

to

tour

ism

,

'Ecosys

tem V

aluati

ons ht

tp://ww

w.ecosys

terpva

luatio

n.orglbe

nefiL

transfer

.htm

recr

eati

on, s

cien

tific d

isco

very

, fzs

heri

es, s

ocie

ty, c

ultu

ral i

nspi

rati

on a

nd

prac

tices

, and

any

oth

er s

ervic

es w

hich

may

be

valu

ed.

(13)

"G

ross

ly n

eglig

ent"

vio

latio

n m

eans

con

scio

us an

d vo

lunt

ary a

cts

or o

mis

sion

s

char

acterized

by

the

failu

re t

o pe

rform

a m

anifes

t du

ty i

n rec

kles

s di

sreg

ard

of t

he

cons

eque

nces

. 8

(14)

"H

arm t

o re

sour

ce"

mea

ns a

n ac

tual

or

pote

ntia

l im

pact

, w

heth

er d

irec

t or

indi

rect,

shor

t or

lon

g te

rm,

actin

g on

a n

atur

al,

cultu

ral

or s

ocia

l res

ourc

e, w

hich

is

expe

cted

to o

ccur

as a

resul

t of u

naut

hori

zed a

cts

of c

onst

ruct

ion,

sho

relin

e al

tera

tion,

or

lands

cape

alter

atio

n as

is d

efine

d as

follo

ws:

(a)

"Maj

or H

arm to

res

ourc

e" m

eans

a si

gnifi

cant

adve

rse

impa

ct(s

), w

hich

can

caus

e su

bsta

ntia

l adv

erse

impa

ct to

exi

stin

g na

tura

l res

ourc

es w

ithin

the

surro

undi

ng a

rea,

com

mun

ity o

r re

gion

, or

dam

age

the

exis

ting

phys

ical

and

envi

ronm

enta

l as

pect

s of

the

lan

d, s

uch

as n

atur

al b

eaut

y an

d op

en s

pace

chara

cter

istic

s

(b) '

'Mod

erat

e H

arm t

o R

esou

rce"

mea

ns a

n ad

vers

e im

pact

(s),

whi

�h c

an

degr

ade

wat

er r

esou

rces

, de

grad

e na

tive

ecos

yste

ms

and

habi

tats

, an

d/or

reduc

e th

e stru

ctur

e or

func

tion

of a

terre

stri

al, l

ittor

al o

r mar

ine

syst

em (

but

not t

o th

e ex

tent

of t

hose

prc

vioil

sly

defin

ed as

thos

e in

(a)

).

(c)

"Min

or H

arm

to

Res

ourc

e" m

eans

lim

ited t

o sh

ort-

term d

irec

t im

pact

s

from

sm

all s

caled

con

stru

ctio

n or

sho

relin

e or

veg

etat

ion

alte

ratio

n ac

tiviti

es.

(d)

"Ver

y M

inor

Harm

to R

esou

rce"

meim

s an

act

ion

in w

hich

the i

mpa

ct o

n

the

wat

er res

ourc

e or

terr

estri

al, l

ittor

al o

r mar

ine

ec6s

yste

m w

as in

sign

ifican

t,

and

was

not

of a

sub

stan

tial n

atur

e ei

ther

indi

vidu

ally

or c

umul

ativ

ely.

For

exa

mple

, "m

ajor

har

m t

o th

e re

sour

ce(s

)" w

ould

be

asso

ciat

ed w

ith

a

maj

or la

nd us

e vi

olat

ion

that

wou

ld h

ave

like

ly r

equi

red

a B

oard

Per

mit

, ·suc

h

as b

uild

ing

a ho

use,

w

hile

a

"min

or h

arm

to

the

reso

urce

(s) "

may

be

1 Defini

tion

adapted

from

Florida

Departm

ent of

Env

ironmental

Protectio

n. 2Q

QQ AdmjnjstiJijve fiQC$

Md Damage

l.i

illililx,.Cit. 62

8-54

.

Page 36: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

asso

ciat

ed

wit

h m

inor

la

nd

uses

re

quir

ing

an

adm

inis

trat

ive

Site

Pla

n

App

rova

l, f

or b

uild

ing

a s

mal

l ac

cess

ory s

truc

ture

.

(15)

"K

now

ing"

vio

latio

n m

c:ans

an

act o

r om

issi

on d

one

with

aw

aren

ess

of th

e na

ture

of th

e co

nduc

t.

(16)

"N

et P

rese

nt V

alue

" m

eans

the

tota

l pr

esen

t va

lue

(PV

) of

a ti

me

seri

es o

f ca

sh

flow

s.

( 17)

"O

CC

L A

dmin

istr

ator

" m

eans

the

Adm

inis

trato

r of

the

Offi

ce o

f C

onse

rvat

ion

and

Coa

stal

Land

s.

( 18)

"Par

ty''

mea

ns e

ach

pers

on o

r age

ncy

nam

ed o

r adm

itted

as

a pa

rty.

( 19)

"P

erson

" m

eans

an

appr

opri

ate

indi

vidu

als,

partn

ersh

ip, c

orpo

ratio

n, a

ssoc

iatio

n,

or p

ublic

or p

rivat

e or

gani

zatio

n of

any

chara

cter

oth

er th

an a

genc

ies.

(20)

"P

resi

ding

Offi

cer"

mea

ns th

e pe

rson

con

duct

ing

the

heari

ng, w

hich

sha

ll be

the

chai

rper

son,

or t

he c

hair

perso

n's

desi

gnat

ed r

epre

sent

ativ

e.

(21)

"P

rimar

y R

esto

ratio

n D

amag

es"

mea

ns th

e co

sts t

o res

tore

the

dam

aged

site

to it

s

prio

r bas

elin

e st

ate.

(22)

"S

ite P

lan"

mea

ns a

pla

n dr

awn

to s

cale

, sho

win

g th

e ac

tual

dim

ensi

ons a

nd s

hape

of th

e pr

oper

ty, t

he s

ize

and

loca

tions

on

the

prop

erty

of e

xist

ing

and

prop

osed

stru

ctur

es

and

open

are

as in

clud

ing

vege

tatio

n an

d la

ndsc

apin

g.

(23)

"W

illfu

l vio

latio

n" m

eans

an

act o

r om

issi

on w

hich

is

volu

ntar

y, in

tent

iona

l and

with

the

spec

ific

inte

nt to

do

som

ethi

ng th

e la

w fo

rbid

s, o

r fai

l to

do s

omet

hing

the

law

requ

ires

to be

don

e.

AP

PE

ND

IXC

:R

EFE

RE

NC

ES

Ces

ar, H

., va

n B

euke

ring,

P.,

Pint

z, S

., D

ierk

ing

J. 2

002.

Economic yaluatjo

n ofthe coral

reefs o

f Haw

aii.

NO

AA

Fin

al R

epor

t NA

l60

Al4

4 9.

Con

serv

atio

n In

tern

atio

nal.

2008

. Economic

j'alues of

Coral Re

efs Maneroyes. and

Seagras

ses: A global

Compilation

. C

ente

r fo

r A

pplied

B

iodi

versi

ty

Scie

nce,

Con

serva

tion

Inte

rnat

iona

l, A

rling

ton

VA

, USA

.

Cos

tanz

a, R

. and

Far

ley J

. 200

7. Ecologic

al economics of

coast

al disaster

s: Introduction

to th

e sp

ecial

issue. E

colo

gica

l Eco

nom

ics

63 p

. 249

-253

.

Cos

tanz

a, R

, d' A

rge,

R, d

e G

root,

R.,

Farb

er, S

., G

rasso

, M.,

Han

non,

B.,

Lim

burg

, K.,

Naeern,

S. ,

O'N

eill,

R. V

., P

aruel

o, J

., R

aski

n, R

G.,

Sutto

n, P

., v

an d

en B

elt,

M.

1997

. Th

e v

alue

of t

he W

orld's

Ecosyst

em Services

a nd Natural

Caojtal. N

atur

e ;38

7

p. 2

53-2

60.

Flor

ida

Dep

artm

ent

of E

nvir

onm

enta

l Pr

otec

tion.

Paroage Costs

jn S!(ilifl

!Ss Habitats.

http

://w

ww

.dcp

.sta

te.fl

.usl

coas

tallhabi

tats/

scagr

assl

awar

enes

s/dam

age_

cost

s.ht

m

Flor

ida D

epar

tmen

t of E

nviro

nmen

tal P

rotec

tion.

2000 Ad

mjn

jstra

tjye F

jncs

and

Damage

Li.iJilli.1y, Ch

. 628

-54.

http

:/lw

ww

.dep

.sta

te. fl

. wiltegal!R

uleslbea

ch/6

2b-5

4.do

c

Flor

ida

Departmen

t of

Env

iron

men

tal

Prot

ectio

n.

2007

. Program

Directive 923

Set

tlemen

t guide

lines

for cjyi

l and adm

inistra

tive

pen

alties

.

ww

w.d

ep.s

tate

.fl.u

slad

minl

depdi

rs/pd

f/923

.pdf

Flor

ida

Dep

artm

ent o

f Env

ironm

enta

l Pro

tectio

n. 2

000.

Rules an

d procedures for

ap

plication for coastal

constr

uctio

n pen

njts. C

h, 6

2B-41,

http

://w

ww

.dep

.sta

te. fl

luslbeachesl

publ

icat

ions

lpdf/

6�b-

4l.p

df

Page 37: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

NOAA

Coa

stal

Serv

ices

Cen

ter.

Habitat Eq

uiva

lency

Aoalvs

is.

ww

w.c

sc.n

oaa.

gov/

c �as

tallec

onom

icsl

habi

tate

qu.h

tm

Mai

ne L

and-

Use

Reg

ulat

ion

Com

mis

sion

,. 20

07. 20

08 Workshop Draft

Comprehensive

Land

Use Plan:

for areas

within

the jurisdic

tion.

htt

p://

ww

w .m

aine

.gov

/doc

/lurc

/ref

eren

celcl

upre

v/C

LU

P Y

WD

raft_

_pg5.s

htm

l

AP

PE

ND

IX D

: D

AMAG

ES E

XAMPL

ES

Exa

mp

les

of D

amag

e A

sses

smen

ts a

nd

Pos

sib

le R

emed

iati

on E

ffor

ts

The

follo

win

g are

onl

y br

ief p

ast

estim

ates

used

in

Haw

aii

and

other

sta

tes;

they

are b

y

no m

eans

com

preh

ensi

ve o

r lim

iting

. T

hese

are

inte

nded

to

be e

xam

ples

for

pos

sibl

e

asse

ssm

ents

and

rem

edia

tion

effort

s no

t as

templ

ates

. As

pre

viou

sly

stat

ed e

ach

case

will

be h

andl

ed in

divi

dual

ly to

acc

ount

for u

niqu

e ec

olog

ical

, econ

omic

and

cul

tura

l im

pact

s.

The

follo

win

g ar

e or

ganized

by

habi

tat type

.

Cor

al

Florida Q

s:parun

ent o

fEgy

jron

men

tal Pro

tecti

on CCjyil

Pamaacsl:

The

PE

P can

impo

se f

ines o

f up

to $

1,00

0/m

2 of r

eef

dam

aged

and

is d

epen

dent

on

the

absen

ce o

f ex

tenu

atin

g ci

rcum

stan

ces

such

as w

eath

er c

ondi

tions

, di

srega

rd o

f sa

fe

boat

ing

prac

tices

, nav

igat

iona

l err

or, w

heth

er th

e ve

ssel

ope

rato

r was

und

er th

e in

flue

nce

of d

rugs

or a

lcoh

ol e

tc.

·

Cesar et

al 20

02 <Ecosystem Service

valuation)

Ces

ar ct

al.

used

a S

impl

e C

oral

Ree

f E

colo

gica

l Eco

nom

ic M

odel

(SC

RE

EM

) to

ass

ess

Haw

aiia

n co

ral r

eefs

bas

ed o

n th

e an

nual

ben

efits

of t

he c

oral

ree

fs to

recr

eatio

n/to

uris

m,

prop

erty

am

eniti

es, b

iodiv

ersi

ty, fi

sher

ies

and

educ

atio

n.

The

annu

al· b

enefi

ts a

nd to

tal

econ

omic

val

ue c

ould

then

be

expr

essed

on

a 'p

er a

rea'

bas

is.

Thi

s st

udy

foun

d th

e to

tal

annu

al b

enefi

ts o

f th

e co

ral r

eefs

ofH

anau

ma

Bay

to b

e $3

7.57

mil

lion

($2,

568/

m1),

of

the

cora

l ree

fs i

n K

ihei

to

be $

28.0

9 m

illio

n ($

651m

2) an

d th

e co

ral

reefs

on

the

Kan

a

coas

t to

be $

17.6

8 m

illio

n ($

191m

2).

Pilaa enforcem

ent CKA-02-1 0

) (pri m

ary Res

tor a

t ion C

ost}

Dam

age

to C

oral

ree

f ec

osys

tem

s w

as a

sses

sed f

or r

esto

ratio

n ac

tiviti

es a

ccor

ding

to

Flor

ida

guid

elin

es, a

s $5

,830

,000

for

5,3

80 m

2 of

cor

al r

eef

dama

ge.

Thi

s ca

lcul

atio

n

Page 38: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

was

sim

ilar

to t

he e

stim

ated

cos

t of r

emed

iatio

n. e

ffor

ts $

390,

000

to c

lean

5,00

0 yd

3 of

beac

h sa

nd. H

owev

er b

etw

een

30,0

00-5

0,00

0 yd

3 was

est

imat

ed to

be

impa

cted

, tot

alin

g

$2,3

00,0

00-$

3,90

0,00

0. W

hile

· clea

ning

the

sedi

men

t from

the

reef w

as e

stim

ated

to c

ost

appr

oxim

at�l

y $8

45,0

00 (

for

the

13 a

cres

, or

$65,

000

for

10m

2).

Thi

s to

tale

d be

twee

n

$3,1

00,0

00 a

nd $

4,70

0,00

0, a

nd d

id n

ot i

nclu

de c

oral

col

ony

re-e

stab

lishm

ent.

An

addi

tiona

l $63

0,00

0 w

as e

stim

ated

for

the

1 0

-yea

r m

onito

ring

per

iod,

(ho

wev

er s

tudi

es

by C

esar

et a

l. 20

03 e

stim

ated

a 2

5 ye

ar p

erio

d fo

r rec

overy

of e

colo

gica

l im

pact

s).

Thus

dama

ge to

cora

ls ma

y be c

alculat

ed as

follo

ws:

# N

umbe

r of s

quar

e m

eter

s of

cor

al d

amag

ed

X M

ultip

lied

by $

1,00

0 (o

r est

imat

ed v

alue

of c

oral

on

per/ar

ea b

asis

)

(#m

2 x

$!00

0)

Plus

the

estim

ated

net

pre

sent

val

ue o

f eco

syst

em s

ervi

ces lo

st u

ntil

reco

very

. (Th

is m

ay

be m

ore

if d

amag

e to

an a

rea

such

as H

anau

ma B

ay w

ith in

crea

sed

recre

atio

nal e

cono

mic

reve

nue.

) +Pl

us c

ost o

f Rem

edia

tion

+Pl

us C

ost o

f clea

ning

sed

imen

t from

reef

+Plu

s Cos

t of c

leani

ng s

edim

ent/m

ud fr

om b

each

sand

+Plu

s C

ost o

f cor

al ree

stab

lishm

ent

+Plu

s C

ost o

f Mon

itori

ng

+Pl

us C

ost o

f Man

agem

ent

Sea

gras

s bed

s !Compens

atory

Dam

age)

The

Flo

rida

DE

P fin

es o

ffen

ders

S I 0

0/yd

2 o

f da

mag

e to

sea

gras

s be

ds fo

r th

e fir

st y

d1

dam

aged

and

$75

/yd2

per

�ch

add

ition

al y

d2 d

amag

ed.

$1 0

0 fo

r the

firs

t yar

d da

mag

ed

+$75

per

eac

h ad

ditio

nal y

ard

or n

et p

rese

nt to

tal v

alue

of ec

osys

tem

ser

vices

lost

unt

il re

cove

ry

+veg

etat

ion

plan

ting

+mon

itorin

g

San

d Beache

s (ex,

Of Primary

Res

tora

tion

Costs)

Min

imum

pen

alty

cos

t of

res

tora

tion

and

pote

ntia

l ne

gativ

e ec

olog

ical

, soc

ial

and

envi

ronm

enta

l im

pact

s sh

ould

be

incl

uded

in

the

asses

smen

t of

dam

aged,

degr

aded

or

lost

san

dy b

each

es.

As o

ne o

f Haw

aii'

s grea

test

nat

ural r

esou

rces

the

follo

win

g sh

ould

be in

clud

ed in

the

mi.n

imum

pen

alty

ass

essm

ent,

how

ever

, as

ecol

ogic

al v

alua

ti� a

nd

resea

rch

cont

inue

, mor

e co

mpr

ehen

sive

est

imat

es m

ay be

pro

duce

d. In

KA-0

2-10

Pila

a,

$390

,000

fine

was

estim

ated

to c

lean

5,00

0 yd

3 of b

each

.

+Cos

t ofl

ost r

even

ue d

ue to

alte

red B

�ch

reso

urces

(com

pens

atory

)

+pri

mary

resto

ratio

n co

sts

+Plu

s co

st o

f cle

anin

g of

sed

imen

t/mud

from

bea

ch a

rea (i

f nec

essar

y)

+Plu

s co

st o

f bea

ch n

ouri

shm

ent (

sand

repl

acem

ent)

+Plu

s co

st o

f nat

ive

dune

veg

etat

ion

(In s

ome

circ

umst

ance

s the

loss

of b

each

reso

urces

may

be

asse

ssed

in c

onj11

nctio

n w

ith

othe

r ecol

ogica

l im

pact

s.lis

ted

abov

e, S\

lch

as c

oral

reefs

and

sea gr

ass

beds.

)

Page 39: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

AP

PE

ND

IX E

: PE

NA

LT

Y C

AL

CU

LA

TIO

N W

ORK

SHEE

T

Vio

lato

r's

Nam

e(s)

: __

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

_ _

TMK.

·�-------------------------------------------

OC

CL

Sta

ffM

embe

r:. ___

-:--

---

----

---

----

----

---

--

Dat

e: _

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

_ _

Par

t 1-

Pen

alti

es

Viola

tion

Penni!

Harm

to

ree or

Pena

lty !A

djustm

ents

!Multi

-day (

# ota

l r-)1l

c Pr

efix

Resou

rce

Veg

etatio

n R

ange

Mark

Adj

. da

ys)

(D,C

,B) (

actua

l &

Status

!(:b

oice #

1-8)

poten

tial)

I 6 i IC

---

----

Pena

lty T

otal

:

Pen

alty

Adj

ustm

ents

an

d D

escr

ipti

ons

(ple

ase

atta

ch a

dditi

onal

adj

ustm

ents

and

desc

ript

ion

s, in

clud

ing

but n

ot l

imit

ed t

o th

ose

list

ed .in

§13-

1-70)

I.

A

ctua

l env

iron

men

tal d

amag

e ex

tent

(ons

ite)

Des

crip

tion:

. __

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

_ _

2. A

ctua

l env

iron

men

tal d

amag

e ex

tent

(off

site

)

Des

crip

tion:.

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

_

3.

Does th

e vi

olat

or's

hav

e a

hist

ory

of v

iola

tions

?

4.

W&,S

the

viol

atio

n rep

etiti

ous o

r of

a lo

ng d

urat

ion?

5.

Was

th

e vi

olat

or

Res

pons

ive

and

exhi

bit

a le

vel

of c

oope

ratio

n of

with

th

e

Dep

artm

ent an

d/or

Sta

fl?

6.

Does

the

Vio

lato

r hav

e a

Fin

anci

al H

ards

hip?

7.

Did

. the

viol

ator

recei

ve E

cono

mic

or

com

mer

cial

gai

n th

rough

non

-com

plia

nce?

8. O

ther

.

Des

crip

t ion ::

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

_ _

Tot

al A

djus

tmen

t: up

/dow

n. __

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

_ _

Mul

ti-da

y pe

nalti

es

Num

ber

af da

ys to

mul

tiply

pen

alty

:. __

_ -,-

Reas

onin

g: _

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

_

Tot

al m

ulti-

day:

__

__

__

__

_ �

--

Page 40: State ofHawaii Natural Resources Board ofLand and Honolulu ...

U,

coI

oCoU,

I—

r.4

C(-4E>0

‘-IC(-4

O’i

ci).0Ea)Uci)


Recommended