STATISTICAL ABSTRACT FISCAL YEAR 2016 - Tennessee · 2017-09-21 · STATISTICAL ABSTRACT FISCAL...

STATISTICAL ABSTRACT

FISCAL YEAR 2016

Prepared: October 2016

By

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Decision Support: Research and Planning Division

The Tennessee Department of Correction

Fiscal Year 2015 – 2016 Statistical Abstract Coordinated and Published by

Decision Support: Research & Planning Division

Tanya Washington, Director

Tim Oliver, Program Support Coordinator

To request a copy of this report, or other research information, contact us at

Telephone: 615-253-8187 Email: [email protected]

Visit the TDOC website: www.tn.gov/correction

Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy on nondiscrimination, the Department of Correction does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sex, age, veteran’s status, disability, pregnancy, creed and genetic information in its policies, or in the admission of or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs, services, or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, EEO/AA Coordinator, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-253-8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-253-8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423.

http://www.tn.gov/correction

BUDGET & STAFFINGPersonnel by Race and Sex 9Personnel by Class 9Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates 10Correctional Officer Series 11Authorized Full Time Equivalents (FTE'S) 11Facility Staffing vs. Inmate Average Daily Population 12Salary Comparisons 13Correctional Officer Turnover Rate 14Probation/Parole Officer Series Vacancy Rates 15Probation/Parole Officer Series 15Authorized Full Time Equivalents (FTE'S) 16Probation/Parole Officer Turnover Rate 16Budget Recommendations by Function of Government 17POPULATION, CAPACITY & TRENDSInstitutional Capacity & Population Distribution 21Operating Capacity v. Inmate Population Projections 22Total Incarcerated Felon Population (Historical and Projected) 22Total Incarcerated Felon Population 23Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Inmate Population Trends 23Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population by Sex 24Felony Inmate Population by Age 25Felony Inmate Population by Sex and Race 26Felony Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location 26Local Jail Census 27Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense (In-house Population Detail) 28Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense (Admissions) 29Average Time Served by Primary Offense (Releases by Location) 30Average Time Served by Primary Offense (Releases by Type) 31Yearly Inmate Admissions and Releases 32Felony Inmate Admissions by Type 32Felony Inmate Releases by Type 32Felony Inmate Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex 33Felony Inmate Releases by Age, Race, and Sex 33Inmate Admissions by Geographical Region 34Inmate Admissions by County of Conviction 35Felon Inmate Population by County of Conviction 36Total Community Supervision Felon Population 37Community Supervision Population by Age 38Community Supervision Population by Sex, Race, and Type 39Community Supervision Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex 40Community Supervision Releases by Age, Race, and Sex 40Community Supervision Admissions and Releases 41Community Supervision Releases by Type 41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

45454647484848495050515252

5556565657585859626364

OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY, PROGRAMS & SERVICESTotal Hours and Estimated Value of Inmate Community Service WorkTotal Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work by Community Supervision Inmate Program AssignmentsInmate Drug ScreensInmate Educational EnrollmentInmate Education Test ResultsGED & Vocational CertificatesChronic Disease Clinic Caseload5-Year Analysis of Hospital AdmissionsBehavioral Health ServicesMental Health Level of Care IIQuality AssuranceOffender Development and RehabilitationINSTITUTIONS (DEMOGRAPHICS)Facility and Probation/Parole Office LocationsPrison Security DesignationsInmate Population Custody LevelsAverage Daily PopulationDemographics by FacilityFacility Populations by Primary OffenseIncidents: FY 2014 - 2015Incident SummaryDemographics of ParoleesDemographics of ProbationersCommunity Supervision Offenders Levels of SupervisionStatistical Abstract User's Guide 67

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Budget and Staffing

Budget & Staffing 9

The Central Office Human Resources section provides technical assistance and advice and ensures compliance with Civil Service Rules, EEOC/Affirmative Action, state law, and policies. This section also implements and monitors personnel-related programs such as employee relations, recruitment and retention, training, performance evaluations, employee transactions, and employee benefits, including accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Personnel by Race and Sex: June 30, 2016

Male Female Total White 2,813 1,523 4,336 Black 598 861 1,459

American Indian 12 6 18 Asian 12 10 22

Hispanic 43 25 68 Other 14 15 29 Total 3,492 2,440 5,932

Personnel by Class: June 30, 2016

Personnel Type FY15-16 FY14-15 FY13-14 FY12-13 FY11-12 FY10-11 FY09-10 FY08-09 FY07-08 FY06-07 FY05-06Officials/ Administrators 2.6% 2.5% 2.3% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.1% 2.1% 2.3% 2.2% 2.0%

Security 56.3% 54.1% 56.5% 54.8% 65.3% 65.4% 64.7% 65.3% 64.0% 64.3% 64.4%

Maintenance 2.9% 3.3% 3.4% 3.3% 4.0% 4.1% 4.4% 4.4% 4.3% 4.3% 4.4%

Professional 28.4% 29.5% 27.5% 28.5% 16.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.1% 16.5% 16.3% 16.1%

Skilled 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% 1.7% 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 2.0% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1%

Clerical 6.4% 6.9% 6.6% 6.7% 6.2% 6.2% 6.5% 6.8% 7.4% 7.4% 7.5%

Technical 1.5% 1.8% 1.8% 2.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.6% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 3.5%

10 2016 Statistical Abstract

As of: Vacant Positions Total Positions Vacancy Rate7/1/2016 246 3476 7.1%7/1/2015 335 3,479 9.6%7/1/2014 266 3,712 7.2%7/1/2013 308 3,705 8.3%7/1/2012 135 3,408 4.0%7/1/2011 125 3,389 3.7%7/1/2010 112 3,360 3.3%7/1/2009 143 3,360 4.3%7/1/2008 173 3,491 5.0%7/1/2007 94 3,356 2.8%7/1/2006 73 3,340 2.2%7/1/2005 55 3,335 1.6%

VACANCIES IN SECURITY STAFF

Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates from 2016

Budget & Staffing 11

Correctional Officer Series June 30, 2016

PositionsCorrectional

Officer

Correctional Clerical Officer Corporal Sergeant Lieutenant Captain TOTAL

Total 2,570 132 459 180 77 58 3,476Filled 2,380 127 418 173 76 56 3,230

Facility Security Non-Security TotalBledsoe County Correctional Complex 506 197 703DeBerry Special Needs Facility 262 170 432Mark Luttrell Correctional Complex 96 55 151Morgan County Correctional Complex 513 172 685Northeast Correctional Complex 374 146 520Northwest Correctional Complex 397 180 577Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 276 60 336Tennessee Correction Academy 1 66 67Tennessee Prison for Women 151 61 212Turney Center Industrial Complex 296 120 416West Tennessee State Penitentiary 394 154 548

Facility Subtotal 3266 1381 4647

Central Office 1 226 227

Total 3267 1607 4874

% of Total 67% 33% 100%

AUTHORIZED FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE'S) in FY 2015 - 2016


STAFFING TRENDS

Correctional facility staffing trends are presented in the graph above. They include data on total facility staffing (expressed in FTEs or full time equivalents) and uniformed security staffing levels as compared to the average daily inmate population. Between FY 2006 and FY 2016: Inmate average daily population increased by 4.6% Total facility staffing decreased by 8.2% Total uniformed security staffing decreased by 12.4%.


SALARY COMPARISONS The ability to recruit and retain qualified staff continues to be a concern for the Department. Because salary levels are critical in recruitment and retention of staff, the Department closely monitors other correctional and law enforcement agencies to compare its salaries with those offered by agencies performing similar functions.

When compared to neighboring state correctional departments, TDOC ranks 6th in the average starting salary for correctional officers. Of the 15 states participating in the Southern Legislative Conference, Tennessee places 8th – with an average starting salary slightly above the SLC average of $27,139. Source: Southern Legislative Conference – July 2015

TDOC also ranks low when compared to other correctional and law enforcement agencies located near some of our facilities. These are some of the agencies with whom we compete directly in the recruitment and retention of uniformed staff.

State DOC

Average Starting Salary

Arkansas $30,135

North Carolina $29,826

Missouri $29,652

Alabama $28,516

Virginia $28,035

Tennessee

$27,329 (July 1, 2016)

Kentucky $26,400

Georgia Mississippi

$26,322

$22,006

Federal Bureau of Prisons $39,858

Shelby County Sheriff’s Office

$35,454

Davidson County Sheriff’s Office $38,097

Hamilton County Sheriff’s Office Knox County Sheriff’s Office

$32,090 $30,813


CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TURNOVER RATES FY 2016

In FY 2016, the correctional officer turnover rate was 36.2% systemwide. The turnover rate includes all officers leaving positions, but excludes those occurring when an employee is transferred or promoted within the TDOC system in the correctional or probation/parole officer series.

Correctional Officer Series Turnover Rate

Bledsoe County Correctional Complex BCCX 36.7%

DeBerry Special Needs Facility DSNF 35.2%

Mark Luttrell Correctional Facility MLCC 26.8%

Morgan County Correctional Complex MCCX 35.6%

Northeast Correctional Complex NECX 17.1%

Northwest Correctional Complex NWCX 46.8%

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution RMSI 44.0%

Tennessee Prison for Women TPFW 61.2%

Turney Center Industrial Complex TCIX 31.8%

West Tennessee State Penitentiary WTSP 34.2%

Systemwide 36.2%

Institution


Probation/Parole Officer Series

2016 Vacancy Rate

As of: Vacant Positions Total Positions Vacancy Rate

7/1/2016 33 748 4.4%7/1/2015 36 754 4.8%7/1/2014 41 790 5.2%7/1/2013 34 793 4.3%

Probation/Parole Officer Series June 30, 2016

Offender population source: TN Felon Population Update (June 2016)

Positions PPO2 PPO3 TOTAL Vacancy Rate

Total 627 121 748Filled 601 114 715

4.4%


Community Supervision Turnover Rate FY 2016

Community Supervision District

Probation/Parole Officer Turnover Rate

District 10 5.4%District 20 13.8%District 21 21.9%District 30 19.5%District 31 3.4%District 40 17.1%District 41 27.3%District 42 17.5%District 50 34.9%District 51 20.0%District 60 3.0%District 61 5.4%District 70 7.1%District 71 12.5%District 72 17.0%District 80 15.2%District 81 9.7%

Systemwide 15.2%

Security Non-Security TotalDistrict 10 56 15 71District 20 58 14 72District 21 32 9 41District 30 77 21 98District 31 29 7 36District 40 41 9 50District 41 33 12 45District 42 40 12 52District 50 43 14 57District 51 35 10 45District 60 33 9 42District 61 37 14 51District 70 28 13 41District 71 24 9 33District 72 47 12 59District 80 33 11 44District 81 31 7 38

Total Districts 677 198 875% of Total 77% 23% 100%

AUTHORIZED FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE'S) FY 2015 - 2016


TDOC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STATE BUDGET

FY 2015 - 2016 Total Budget Recommendations By Function of Government

The State of Tennessee's Budget included $31.6 billion in recommended funding allocated by "functional area." Total funding budgeted for the Department of Correction in FY 2016 was $926,444,400.

Population, Capacity, and Trends

Population, Capacity, & Trends 21

TDOC INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY & POPULATION DISTRIBUTION

GENERAL PURPOSE FACILITIESBledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) - Female 300 294 297 99.0% 101.0%Hardeman County Correctional Center (HCCF) 2,100 1,976 1,991 94.8% 100.8%Mark Luttrell Correctional Center (MLCC) 454 445 428 94.3% 96.2%Northeast Correctional Complex (NECX) 1,880 1,842 1,788 95.1% 97.1%Northwest Correctional Complex (NWCX) 2,436 2,387 2,355 96.7% 98.7%South Central Correctional Facility (SCCF) 1,700 1,642 1,657 97.5% 100.9%Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex (TTCC) 2,672 2,619 1,701 63.7% 64.9%Turney Center Industrial Complex (TCIX) 1,734 1,699 1,593 91.9% 93.8%Whiteville Correctional Facility (WCFA) 1,619 1,505 1,521 93.9% 101.1%SUB-TOTAL 14,895 14,409 13,331 89.5% 92.5%CLASSIFICATION FACILITIESBledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) - Male 2,239 2,194 2,155 96.2% 98.2%Tennessee Prison for Women (TPFW) 817 801 797 97.6% 99.5%SUB-TOTAL 3,056 2,995 2,952 96.6% 98.6%SPECIAL PURPOSE FACILITIESDeBerry Special Needs Facility (DSNF) 854 786 668 78.2% 85.0%SUB-TOTAL 854 786 668 78.2% 85.0%HIGH SECURITY FACILITIESMorgan County Correctional Complex (MCCX) 2,294 2,225 2,233 97.3% 100.4%Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (RMSI) 808 784 787 97.4% 100.4%West Tennessee State Penitentiary (WTSP) 974 945 831 85.3% 87.9%SUB-TOTAL 4,076 3,954 3,851 94.5% 97.4%TOTALS 22,881 22,144 20,802 90.9% 93.9%Source: TDOC Population Overview Report.

INSTITUTION Total Beds Available

TDOC Operating Capacity

Assigned Count as of 6/30/2016

Population as a Percent of

Available Beds

Operating Capacity

.


TDOC OPERATING CAPACITY COMPARED TO INMATE POPULATION PROJECTIONS

Fiscal Year End June 30th

Operating Capacity

Projected Population

Unmet Bed

Demand2017 22,144 29,514 7,3702018 22,144 29,720 7,5762019 22,144 30,537 8,3932020 22,144 31,002 8,858


FELON POPULATION TRENDS The felon population data included in this Statistical Abstract is from the Tennessee Offender Management Information System (TOMIS) unless otherwise stated. Data from other sources may vary from TOMIS due to the time delay in the TOMIS data entry process. The data on this page and page 24 are from TDOC monthly population reports.

Total Incarcerated Felon Population: June 30, 2016

County/Local Jails Locally Sentenced 3,841 TDOC Backup 4,719 TDOC Prisons 20,802

TOTAL 29,362 Source: Tennessee Felon Population Update

.


Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population Trends Over the past 12 fiscal years (2005 - 2016), the incarcerated felon population (including TDOC backup and locally sentenced felons) has increased 12.0% (from 26,209 to 29,362). The male and female felon population increased 8.9% (from 24,251 to 26,421) and 50.2% (from 1,958 to 2,941) respectively during this same period. During the past fiscal year, the total incarcerated felon population increased from 29,263 in June 2015 to 29,362 in June 2016, an increase of 0.3%. The male felon population decreased 0.5% and the female felon population increased 8.6% during FY 2016.

Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population: FY 2005 - 2016


FELONY INMATE DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, RACE

Felony Inmate Population by Age (Systemwide) June 30, 2016

Felony Inmate Population by Age: June 30, 2016

65+ 523 2.5% 32 0.5% 21 0.7% 576 1.9%60-64 587 2.8% 77 1.2% 39 1.3% 703 2.3%55-59 1,085 5.2% 154 2.5% 103 3.4% 1,342 4.5%50-54 1,646 7.9% 322 5.2% 180 6.0% 2,148 7.2%45-49 2,153 10.4% 560 9.0% 189 6.3% 2,902 9.7%40-44 2,613 12.6% 733 11.8% 280 9.3% 3,626 12.1%35-39 3,343 16.1% 1,095 17.6% 380 12.6% 4,818 16.1%30-34 3,405 16.4% 1,240 20.0% 496 16.5% 5,141 17.2%25-29 3,345 16.1% 1,247 20.1% 605 20.1% 5,197 17.3%20-24 1,941 9.4% 720 11.6% 652 21.7% 3,313 11.1%18-19 98 0.5% 25 0.4% 55 1.8% 178 0.6%<18 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 0.0%Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 5 0.2% 6 0.0%TOTAL 20,744 100% 6,206 100% 3,005 100% 29,955 100%

LOCAL FELON % SYSTEMWIDE %TDOC

INHOUSE % TDOC BACKUP %

Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System

.


Black43%

White55%

Other2%

Felony Inmate Population by Sex and Race

(Systemwide) June 30, 2016

Female

10%

Male90%

Felony Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location June 30, 2016

MaleBlack 8,977 46.7% 1,327 26.3% 1,746 68.0% 12,050White 9,721 50.6% 3,650 72.3% 761 29.6% 14,132Asian 50 0.3% 5 0.1% 0 0.0% 55Hispanic 452 2.4% 62 1.2% 56 2.2% 570Native American 25 0.1% 5 0.1% 3 0.1% 33Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 2

Total Male 19,225 100.0% 5,050 100.0% 2,567 100.0% 26,842

FemaleBlack 394 25.9% 88 7.6% 154 35.2% 636White 1,098 72.3% 1,067 92.3% 277 63.2% 2,442Asian 4 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.2% 5Hispanic 18 1.2% 1 0.1% 5 1.1% 24Native American 5 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.2% 6Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Total Female 1,519 100.0% 1,156 100.0% 438 100.0% 3,113

TOTAL 20,744 68.4% 6,206 21.2% 3,005 10.0% 29,955

TDOC % Backup % Local % Systemwide


LOCAL JAIL CENSUS

JULY

AUG

SEPT

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUNE

27,98

628

,560

28,66

828

,765

28,14

927

,444

28,13

928

,531

28,86

128

,973

29,30

029

,190

TDOC

Back

up4,9

904,9

675,1

105,1

595,2

475,2

185,0

365,1

145,0

134,8

504,7

594,7

19

Loca

l Felo

ns3,8

753,8

953,9

293,8

283,8

373,6

723,6

483,7

833,8

333,8

383,7

793,8

41

Othe

r Con

victed

Felon

s61

963

665

163

861

752

657

863

266

561

963

063

3

Conv

icted

Misd

emea

nants

4,821

4,750

4,728

4,675

4,376

4,126

4,288

4,265

4,454

4,749

4,640

4,708

Othe

rs89

592

688

186

686

192

790

091

195

7

1,1

14

845

876

Pre-t

rial D

etaine

esFe

lony

9,027

9,350

9,358

9,462

9,307

9,269

9,590

9,635

9,783

9,656

9,686

9,917

Misd

emea

nant

3,759

4,036

4,011

4,137

3,904

3,706

4,099

4,191

4,156

4,147

4,961

4,496

JULY

AUG

SEPT

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUNE

TDOC

Back

up17

.8%17

.4%17

.8%17

.9%18

.6%19

.0%17

.9%17

.9%17

.4%16

.7%16

.2%16

.2%

Loca

l Felo

ns13

.8%13

.6%13

.7%13

.3%13

.6%13

.4%13

.0%13

.3%13

.3%13

.2%12

.9%13

.2%

Othe

r Con

victed

Felon

s2.2

%2.2

%2.3

%2.2

%2.2

%1.9

%2.1

%2.2

%2.3

%2.1

%2.2

%2.2

%

Conv

icted

Misd

emea

nants

17.2%

16.6%

16.5%

16.3%

15.5%

15.0%

15.2%

14.9%

15.4%

16.4%

15.8%

16.1%

Othe

rs3.2

%3.2

%3.1

%3.0

%3.1

%3.4

%3.2

%3.2

%3.3

%3.8

%2.9

%3.0

%

Pre-t

rial D

etaine

esFe

lony

32.3%

32.7%

32.6%

32.9%

33.1%

33.8%

34.1%

33.8%

33.9%

33.3%

33.1%

34.0%

Misd

emea

nant

13.4%

14.1%

14.0%

14.4%

13.9%

13.5%

14.6%

14.7%

14.4%

14.3%

16.9%

15.4%

Loca

l Jail

Cens

us: F

Y 201

5 - 20

16

Total

Jail P

opula

tion

Perce

ntage

of Ja

il Po

pulat

ion

Sourc

e: TD

OC Ja

il Sum

mary

Repo

rt as o

f Jun

e 30,

2016

.


Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense In-house Population Detail

NU

MBE

R%

OF

AVER

AGE

NU

MBE

R%

OF

AVER

AGE

NU

MBE

R%

OF

AVER

AGE

NU

MBE

R%

OF

AVER

AGE

OF

TDO

CSE

NTE

NC

EO

FTD

OC

SEN

TEN

CE

OF

LOC

ALLY

SEN

TEN

CE

OF

SYST

EM -

SEN

TEN

CE

PRIM

ARY

OFF

ENSE

GR

OU

PO

FFEN

DER

SIN

HO

USE

(YEA

RS)

OFF

END

ERS

BAC

KUP

(YEA

RS)

OFF

END

ERS

SEN

TEN

CED

(YEA

RS)

OFF

END

ERS

WID

E(Y

EAR

S)

H

omic

ide

M

urde

r 3,

960

19.0

9%28

.22

400.

64%

25.9

44

0.13

%7.

004,

004

13.3

7%28

.14

N

eglig

ent M

ansl

augh

ter

90.

04%

7.11

60.

10%

3.50

30.

10%

4.00

180.

06%

5.39

K

idna

ppin

g28

81.

39%

18.9

817

0.27

%7.

947

0.23

%5.

7131

21.

04%

18.0

3

S

ex O

ffens

es

Fo

rcib

le2,

680

12.9

2%25

.87

119

1.92

%9.

0026

0.87

%6.

092,

825

9.43

%24

.96

N

on-F

orci

ble

115

0.55

%9.

2168

1.10

%3.

4421

0.70

%4.

4320

40.

68%

6.80

A

ssau

lt

Agg

rava

ted

Assa

ult

2,67

812

.91%

16.0

758

79.

46%

6.38

463

15.4

1%4.

823,

728

12.4

5%13

.14

Oth

er A

ssau

lt36

0.17

%5.

2452

0.84

%3.

2126

0.87

%2.

7211

40.

38%

3.74

A

rson

850.

41%

15.8

621

0.34

%8.

818

0.27

%4.

1911

40.

38%

13.7

4

B

urgl

ary

1,65

57.

98%

10.5

292

414

.89%

5.80

549

18.2

7%4.

643,

128

10.4

4%8.

09

F

orge

ry/F

raud

235

1.13

%8.

2029

64.

77%

4.01

963.

19%

3.21

627

2.09

%5.

46

L

arce

ny/T

heft

854

4.12

%8.

9682

013

.21%

4.78

317

10.5

5%3.

681,

991

6.65

%6.

39

R

obbe

ry

Agg

rava

ted

Rob

bery

2,45

211

.82%

17.6

319

43.

13%

11.0

778

2.60

%6.

842,

724

9.09

%16

.84

All

Oth

er R

obbe

ry57

82.

79%

9.74

166

2.67

%6.

8913

04.

33%

5.14

874

2.92

%8.

51

D

rug

Offe

nses

Coc

aine

1,

575

7.59

%14

.56

438

7.06

%9.

8916

05.

32%

6.54

2,17

37.

25%

13.0

2

Oth

er D

rug

Offe

nses

2,00

39.

66%

11.1

51,

476

23.7

8%6.

1933

211

.05%

4.70

3,81

112

.72%

8.67

V

ehic

ular

Veh

icul

ar H

omic

ide/

DU

I17

50.

84%

17.0

335

0.56

%10

.73

50.

17%

7.20

215

0.72

%15

.78

All

Oth

er V

ehic

ular

460.

22%

6.00

560.

90%

3.60

120.

40%

3.25

114

0.38

%4.

53

0

C

/S/F

Per

son

277

1.34

%20

.18

220.

35%

12.5

37

0.23

%6.

7930

61.

02%

19.3

3

C

/S/F

Pro

perty

970.

47%

9.33

460.

74%

4.78

260.

87%

4.87

169

0.56

%7.

40

C

/S/F

Soc

ieta

l/Dru

gs14

20.

68%

14.5

396

1.55

%5.

5021

0.70

%4.

4125

90.

86%

10.3

6

E

scap

e4

0.02

%7.

0012

0.19

%3.

250

0.00

%16

0.05

%4.

19

A

ll O

ther

79

23.

82%

8.13

715

11.5

2%3.

7726

18.

69%

3.39

1,76

85.

90%

5.66

U

nsen

tenc

ed8

0.04

%0.

00%

453

15.0

7%46

11.

54%

0

TOTA

L20

,744

100%

16.6

96,

206

100%

6.13

3,00

510

0%3.

9029

,955

100%

12.9

3

Sent

ence

Typ

e

D

eath

640.

89%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

640.

74%

N/A

L

ife2,

252

31.2

1%N

/A9

0.84

%N

/A0

0.00

%N

/A2,

261

26.0

1%N

/A

8

5%4,

689

64.9

9%24

.38

908.

40%

14.9

35

1.23

%7.

874,

784

55.0

4%24

.19

1

-2 Y

ears

210

2.91

%1.

9297

390

.76%

1.80

400

98.7

7%1.

751,

583

18.2

1%1.

80

* 2,3

25 o

ffend

ers

with

sen

tenc

es o

f dea

th (6

4), a

nd lif

e (2

,261

) are

incl

uded

in th

e TD

OC

cou

nts;

how

ever

, the

se o

ffend

ers

are

not i

nclu

ded

in c

alcu

latio

n of

ave

rage

sen

tenc

e le

ngth

s.

Felo

ny In

mat

e Po

pula

tion:

Av

erag

e To

tal S

ente

nce

Leng

th b

y Pr

imar

y O

ffens

e: F

Y 20

15 -

2016

TDO

C IN

HO

USE

TDO

C B

AC

KU

PLO

CA

LLY

SEN

TEN

CED

SYST

EMW

IDE

OTHERPERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL


Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense

Admissions

Hom

icid

e

M

urde

r 21

02.

02%

24.9

43

0.14

%6.

3321

31.

70%

24.5

6

Negl

igen

t Man

slau

ghte

r18

0.17

%3.

362

0.09

%4.

0020

0.16

%3.

43Ki

dnap

ping

460.

44%

12.9

83

0.14

%4.

0049

0.39

%12

.43

Sex

Offe

nses

Fo

rcib

le33

43.

22%

14.1

725

1.17

%4.

4235

92.

87%

13.5

0

Non-

Forc

ible

105

1.01

%3.

7123

1.08

%3.

2612

81.

02%

3.63

Assa

ult

Agg

rava

ted

Assa

ult

1003

9.66

%8.

0037

217

.39%

4.29

1,37

510

.98%

6.99

Oth

er A

ssau

lt95

1.08

%2.

8931

1.08

%2.

0912

61.

01%

2.69

Arso

n36

0.35

%6.

1410

0.47

%3.

8146

0.37

%5.

63Bu

rgla

ry1,

430

13.7

8%6.

0842

920

.06%

3.96

1,85

914

.85%

5.59

Forg

ery/

Frau

d46

64.

49%

4.31

105

4.91

%2.

9457

14.

56%

4.06

Larc

eny/

Thef

t1,

316

12.6

8%4.

5834

716

.22%

2.88

1,66

313

.28%

4.22

Robb

ery

Agg

rava

ted

Robb

ery

507

4.88

%12

.96

462.

15%

6.70

553

4.42

%12

.44

All

Oth

er R

obbe

ry31

73.

05%

7.46

101

4.72

%4.

4941

83.

34%

6.74

Drug

Offe

nses

Coc

aine

71

26.

86%

10.9

988

4.11

%5.

9380

06.

39%

10.4

3

O

ther

Dru

g O

ffens

es2,

293

22.0

9%6.

3522

710

.61%

3.93

2,52

020

.13%

6.13

Vehi

cula

r

Veh

icul

ar H

omic

ide/

DUI

480.

46%

13.5

13

0.14

%8.

6751

0.41

%13

.23

All

Oth

er V

ehic

ular

112

1.08

%2.

8415

0.70

%2.

3312

71.

01%

2.78

C/S/

F Pe

rson

*61

0.59

%13

.33

60.

28%

5.42

670.

54%

12.6

2

C/S/

F Pr

oper

ty*

870.

84%

4.48

291.

36%

4.15

116

0.93

%4.

39

C/S/

F So

ciet

al/D

rugs

*12

41.

19%

1.19

231.

08%

3.59

147

1.17

%6.

25

Esca

pe10

0.10

%3.

860

0.00

%0.

0010

0.08

%3.

86

All O

ther

10

4910

.11%

3.81

251

11.7

3%2.

531,

300

10.3

9%3.

57

Unkn

own

00.

00%

00

0.00

%0

00.

00%

0

TOTA

L***

10,3

7910

0%7.

082,

139

100%

3.76

12,5

1810

0%6.

51

Sent

ence

Typ

e

D

eath

30.

03%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

30.

02%

N/A

L

ife72

0.69

%N/

A0

0.00

%N/

A72

0.58

%N/

A

8

5%39

83.

83%

19.1

20

0.00

%0.

0039

83.

18%

19.1

2

1

-2 Y

ears

1,90

518

.35%

1.81

662

30.9

5%1.

722,

567

20.5

1%1.

79

* C/S

/F re

fers

to n

on-s

ubsta

ntive

offe

nses

suc

h as

con

spira

cy, s

olici

tatio

n, fa

cilita

tion,

aid

ing,

and

abe

tting,

etc

.31

6 un

proc

esse

d jud

gmen

t ord

ers

-- to

tal a

dmiss

ions

: 12

,834

.72

offe

nder

s wi

th lif

e se

nten

ces

and

3 of

fend

ers

with

a d

eath

sen

tenc

e ar

e in

clude

d in

the

TDOC

cou

nts,

but

are

not

inclu

ded

in th

e ca

lculat

ion

of a

vera

ge s

ente

nce

lengt

hs.

Aver

age

Sent

ence

Len

gth

by P

rimar

y O

ffens

e G

roup

: FY

2015

- 20

16Fe

lony

Adm

issi

ons

PRIM

ARY

OFF

ENSE

G

ROUP

TDO

C SE

NTEN

CED

LOCA

LLY

SENT

ENCE

DSY

STEM

WID

E

% O

f Sys

tem

To

tal

Aver

age

Sent

ence

(Y

ears

)

Num

ber o

f O

ffend

ers

% O

f TDO

C To

tal

Aver

age

Sent

ence

(Y

ears

)

Num

ber o

f O

ffend

ers

% O

f Loc

al

Tota

l

Aver

age

Sent

ence

(Y

ears

)

Syst

em-w

ide

Tota

l

PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL OTHER

.


Average Time Served by Primary Offense Releases by Location

Hom

icide

Murd

er18

33.

46%

19.7

217

0.29

%8.

0813

0.46

%4.

1221

31.

52%

17.8

7

Negl

igen

t Man

slaug

hter

90.

17%

3.34

70.

12%

1.73

50.

18%

1.40

210.

15%

2.39

Kidn

appi

ng42

0.79

%11

.75

50.

09%

4.18

50.

18%

3.94

520.

37%

10.2

7

Sex

Offe

nses

Forc

ible

287

5.43

%11

.51

911.

55%

7.17

381.

34%

4.97

416

2.97

%10

.00

Non-

Forc

ible

340.

64%

4.99

591.

01%

2.09

230.

81%

1.65

116

0.83

%2.

86

Assa

ult

Agg

rava

ted

Assa

ult

585

11.0

6%7.

1247

18.

04%

3.58

390

13.7

2%2.

501,

446

10.3

4%4.

74

Othe

r Ass

ault

200.

38%

2.93

761.

30%

2.05

381.

34%

1.81

134

0.96

%2.

11

Arso

n26

0.49

%5.

6623

0.39

%3.

149

0.32

%6.

0358

0.41

%4.

77

Burg

lary

750

14.1

8%5.

7789

615

.30%

3.52

541

19.0

4%2.

632,

187

15.6

4%4.

09

Forg

ery/F

raud

174

3.29

%4.

1835

26.

01%

2.87

121

4.26

%2.

3764

74.

63%

3.14

Larc

eny/T

heft

522

9.87

%4.

1286

414

.75%

2.70

435

15.3

1%2.

131,

821

13.0

2%2.

98

Robb

ery

Aggr

avat

ed R

obbe

ry44

48.

40%

10.4

510

41.

78%

6.82

471.

65%

3.77

595

4.25

%9.

29

All O

ther

Rob

bery

197

3.73

%5.

8213

22.

25%

3.90

127

4.47

%2.

7845

63.

26%

4.43

Drug

Offe

nses

Coca

ine

Offe

nses

583

11.0

2%7.

8337

36.

37%

6.34

206

7.25

%3.

721,

162

8.31

%6.

65

Othe

r Dru

g Of

fens

es85

916

.24%

4.81

1,44

224

.62%

3.11

432

15.2

0%2.

752,

733

19.5

4%3.

60

Vehi

cula

r

Vehi

cula

r Hom

icide

/DUI

330.

62%

7.06

170.

29%

5.55

00.

00%

0.00

500.

36%

6.57

All O

ther

Veh

icula

r30

0.57

%3.

6995

1.62

%1.

8915

0.53

%1.

9914

01.

00%

2.29

C/S/

F Pe

rson

500.

95%

10.1

011

0.19

%7.

767

0.25

%3.

4268

0.49

%9.

12

C/S/

F Pr

oper

ty39

0.74

%5.

1362

1.06

%3.

0938

1.34

%3.

6313

90.

99%

3.81

C/S/

F So

cieta

l/Dru

gs45

0.85

%5.

5165

1.11

%3.

0945

1.58

%2.

6015

51.

11%

3.65

Esca

pe5

0.09

%4.

1510

0.17

%3.

220

0.00

%0.

0015

0.11

%3.

51

All O

ther

371

7.02

%4.

0668

511

.70%

2.21

307

10.8

0%1.

891,

363

9.74

%2.

65

Unkn

own

00.

00%

0.00

00.

00%

0.00

0.00

%0

0.00

%0.

00

TOTA

L5,

288

100.

0%6.

915,

857

100.

0%3.

372,

842

100.

0%2.

6113

,987

100.

0%4.

57

Aver

age

time

serve

d do

es n

ot in

clude

six

(6) m

odifie

d jud

gem

ent o

rder

s. T

otal

relea

ses

are

13,9

93.

Aver

age T

ime S

erve

d by L

ocati

on: F

Y 20

15 - 2

016

Felon

y Rele

ases

Prim

ary O

ffens

e Ca

tego

ry

TDOC

INHO

USE

TDOC

BAC

KUP

LOCA

LLY

SENT

ENCE

DSY

STEM

WID

E

Num

ber o

f Of

fend

ers

%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

ears)

Num

ber o

f Of

fend

ers

%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

ears)

Num

ber o

f Of

fend

ers

%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

ears)

OTHERNu

mbe

r of

Offe

nder

s%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

ears)

PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL


Average Time Served by Primary Offense

Releases by Type

Homi

cide

Murde

r87

2.33%

21.31

971.8

9%14.

3525

8.65%

21.91

40.1

1%5.3

80

0.00%

0.00

2131.5

2%17.

87

Negli

gent

Mansl

augh

ter2

0.05%

2.40

120.2

3%2.8

71

0.35%

2.50

40.1

1%1.4

02

0.19%

0.50

210.1

5%2.3

9

Kidna

pping

130.3

5%16.

5531

0.60%

7.55

20.6

9%22.

406

0.16%

6.70

00.0

0%0.0

052

0.37%

10.27

Sex O

ffense

s

Forci

ble218

5.84%

9.84

831.6

2%12.

9828

9.69%

11.84

862.2

9%6.9

51

0.09%

2.90

4162.9

7%10.

00

Non-F

orcibl

e0

0.00%

0.00

661.2

8%3.5

02

0.69%

4.15

451.2

0%1.8

63

0.28%

2.97

1160.8

3%2.8

6

Assau

lt Aggra

vated

Assau

lt276

7.39%

6.21

74014.

40%5.2

338

13.15%

4.90

3108.2

5%2.8

082

7.68%

2.31

1,446

10.34%

4.74

Other

Assau

lt10

0.27%

3.16

440.8

6%2.4

31

0.35%

4.20

721.9

2%1.7

97

0.66%

1.39

1340.9

6%2.1

1

Arson

170.4

6%5.7

623

0.45%

5.80

20.6

9%3.4

012

0.32%

2.02

40.3

7%2.8

758

0.41%

4.77

Burgl

ary543

14.54%

5.41

89517.

42%4.4

036

12.46%

5.56

51313.

65%2.6

0200

18.73%

2.49

2,187

15.64%

4.09

Forge

ry/Fra

ud117

3.13%

3.91

2434.7

3%3.9

510

3.46%

3.19

2255.9

9%2.0

552

4.87%

2.35

6474.6

3%3.1

4

Larce

ny/Th

eft353

9.45%

9.45

61912.

05%3.6

618

6.23%

2.75

69718.

55%1.8

7134

12.55%

2.55

1,821

13.02%

2.98

Robb

ery Aggra

vated

Robb

ery227

6.08%

11.01

3266.3

4%8.4

77

2.42%

11.57

320.8

5%5.2

73

0.28%

3.90

5954.2

5%9.2

9

All Ot

her R

obbe

ry159

4.26%

4.86

1913.7

2%4.6

19

3.11%

2.54

701.8

6%3.8

027

2.53%

2.66

4563.2

6%4.4

3

Drug O

ffense

s

Cocai

ne Of

fenses

51013.

66%7.0

1317

6.17%

7.93

2910.

03%7.2

5194

5.16%

5.21

11210.

49%3.3

31,1

628.3

1%6.6

5

Other

Drug O

ffense

s824

22.07%

4.45

80215.

61%4.2

355

19.03%

2.97

73219.

48%2.4

1320

29.96%

2.53

2,733

19.54%

3.60

Vehic

ular

Vehic

ular H

omicid

e/DUI

250.6

7%5.9

119

0.37%

7.95

00.0

0%0.0

05

0.13%

4.90

10.0

9%3.4

050

0.36%

6.57

All Ot

her V

ehicu

lar13

0.35%

4.08

531.0

3%3.1

52

0.69%

2.05

661.7

6%1.3

16

0.56%

1.78

1401.0

0%2.2

9

C/S/F

Perso

n30

0.80%

8.94

280.5

4%11.

340

0.00%

0.00

70.1

9%2.7

73

0.28%

2.83

680.4

9%9.1

2C/S

/F Pro

perty

391.0

4%5.2

244

0.86%

3.33

10.3

5%0.4

049

1.30%

3.45

60.5

6%1.7

2139

0.99%

3.81

C/S/F

Socie

tal/Dr

ugs

431.1

5%4.5

347

0.91%

4.38

10.3

5%0.6

050

1.33%

2.79

141.3

1%1.7

5155

1.11%

3.65

Escap

e2

0.05%

0.50

90.1

8%4.6

00

0.00%

0.00

40.1

1%1.2

30

0.00%

0.00

150.1

1%3.5

1

All Ot

her

2266.0

5%6.0

5450

8.76%

3.16

227.6

1%2.5

9574

15.28%

1.86

918.5

2%2.1

81,3

639.7

4%2.6

5

Unkno

wn0

0.00%

0.00

00.0

0%0.0

00

0.00%

0.00

00.0

0%0.0

00

0.00%

0.00

00.0

0%

TOTA

L3,7

34100

.00%

6.20

5,139

100.00

%5.1

1289

100.00

%6.8

2375

7100

.00%

2.55

1,068

100.00

%2.5

313,

987100

.00%

4.57

Averag

e time

serve

d does

not in

clude

tsix (6)

modifi

ed jud

gement

orders

. Total

release

s are 1

3,993

SOCIETAL OTHERPERSON PROPERTY

Avera

ge Ti

me

Serve

d (Ye

ars)

Numb

er of

Offen

ders

%%

%Av

erage

Time

Se

rved

(Years

)

Numb

er of

Offen

ders

%Av

erage

Time

Se

rved

(Years

)

Avera

ge Ti

me

Serve

d (Ye

ars)

SYST

EMWI

DE

Avera

ge Ti

me

Serve

d (Ye

ars)

Numb

er of

Offen

ders

%Av

erage

Time

Se

rved

(Years

)

Numb

er of

Offen

ders

%Nu

mber

of Off

ende

rsNu

mber

of Off

ende

rs

Felony

Relea

ses Av

erage

Time S

erved

by Re

lease

Type: F

Y 2015

- 2016

PRIMA

RY OF

FENS

E GRO

UP

PARO

LEEX

PIRAT

IONOT

HER

PROB

ATION

COMM

UNITY

CORR

ECTIO

NS

.


INMATE ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES

In FY 2016, admissions decreased 762 (5.60%) and releases decreased 784 (5.31%) since last year.

Felony Inmate Admissions by Type: FY 2015-2016

Felony Inmate Releases by Type: FY 2015-2016

TYPE TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Parole Violtr. Return 1,567 15.1% 137 6.4% 19 6.0% 1,723 13.4%Probation Violltr Return 2,006 19.3% 404 18.9% 90 28.5% 2,500 19.5%Community Corr. Return 794 7.7% 31 1.4% 35 11.1% 860 6.7%New Commit 5,892 56.8% 1,529 71.5% 163 51.6% 7,584 59.1%Escape Return & Other 120 1.2% 38 1.8% 9 2.8% 167 1.3%

TOTAL 10,379 2,139 316 12,834

TYPE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Parole 2,443 46.2% 956 16.3% 335 11.8% 0 0.0% 3,734 26.7%Probation 602 11.4% 2,265 38.7% 890 31.3% 1 33.3% 3,758 26.9%Community Corrections 32 0.6% 506 8.6% 530 18.6% 2 66.7% 1,068 7.6%Sentence Expiration 2,098 39.7% 2,010 34.3% 1,032 36.3% 0 0.0% 5,142 36.7%Death 89 1.7% 3 0.1% 3 0.1% 0 0.0% 95 0.7%Other 27 0.5% 117 2.0% 52 1.8% 0 0.0% 196 1.4%

TOTAL 5,291 5,857 2,842 3 13,993


Felony Inmate Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2015 – 2016

Felony Inmate Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2015 – 2016

TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %65+ 58 0.6% 3 0.1% 0 0.0% 61 0.5%

60-64 108 1.0% 22 1.0% 2 0.6% 132 1.0%55-59 265 2.6% 66 3.1% 14 4.4% 345 2.7%50-54 528 5.1% 129 6.0% 17 5.4% 674 5.3%45-49 830 8.0% 131 6.1% 27 8.5% 988 7.7%40-44 1,158 11.2% 181 8.5% 27 8.5% 1,366 10.6%35-39 1,578 15.2% 252 11.8% 63 19.9% 1,893 14.7%30-34 2,046 19.7% 326 15.2% 57 18.0% 2,429 18.9%25-29 2,080 20.0% 457 21.4% 68 21.5% 2,605 20.3%20-24 1,547 14.9% 503 23.5% 39 12.3% 2,089 16.3%18-19 170 1.6% 69 3.2% 2 0.6% 241 1.9%<18 11 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 0.1%

Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 10,379 2,139 316 12,834

RACE TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %

Black 2,992 28.8% 1,644 76.9% 127 40.2% 4,763 37.1%White 7,210 69.5% 448 20.9% 185 58.5% 7,843 61.1%Asian 19 0.2% 4 0.2% 0 0.0% 23 0.2%

Hispanic 149 1.4% 43 2.0% 3 0.9% 195 1.5%Native American 9 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 10 0.1%

TOTAL 10,379 2,139 316 12,834

Sex TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Male 8,545 82.3% 1,888 88.3% 255 80.7% 10,688 83.3%

Female 1,834 17.7% 251 11.7% 61 19.3% 2,146 16.7%TOTAL 10,379 2,139 316 12,834


TDOC % BACKUP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %65+ 89 1.7% 19 0.3% 12 0.4% 0 0.0% 120 0.9%

60-64 139 2.6% 47 0.8% 30 1.1% 1 33.3% 217 1.6%55-59 241 4.6% 152 2.6% 104 3.7% 0 0.0% 497 3.6%50-54 384 7.3% 298 5.1% 179 6.3% 1 0.3333 862 6.2%45-49 520 9.8% 444 7.6% 198 7.0% 0 0.0% 1,162 8.3%40-44 613 11.6% 632 10.8% 269 9.5% 0 0.0% 1,514 10.8%35-39 882 16.7% 950 16.2% 371 13.1% 0 0.0% 2,203 15.7%30-34 1,020 19.3% 1246 21.3% 481 16.9% 1 33.3% 2,748 19.6%25-29 986 18.6% 1248 21.3% 602 21.2% 0 0.0% 2,836 20.3%20-24 410 7.7% 784 13.4% 553 19.5% 0 0.0% 1,747 12.5%18-19 7 0.1% 36 0.6% 42 1.5% 0 0.0% 85 0.6%<18 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.0%

Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 5,291 5,857 2,842 3 13,993

RACE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Black 1,955 36.9% 1,284 21.9% 1,862 65.5% 1 33.3% 5,102 36.5%White 3,222 60.9% 4,506 76.9% 922 32.4% 2 66.7% 8,652 61.8%Asian 10 0.2% 12 0.2% 8 0.3% 0 0.0% 30 0.2%

Hispanic 95 1.8% 53 0.9% 47 1.7% 0 0.0% 195 1.4%Native American 9 0.2% 2 0.0% 2 0.1% 0 0.0% 13 0.1%

Unknown 0 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0%TOTAL 5,291 5,857 2,842 3 13,993

Sex TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Male 4,676 88.4% 4,568 78.0% 2,444 86.0% 3 100.0% 11,691 83.5%

Female 615 11.6% 1,289 22.0% 398 14.0% 0 0.0% 2,302 16.5%TOTAL 5,291 5,857 2,842 3 13,993


.


Inm

ate

Adm

issi

ons

by G

eogr

aphi

cal R

egio

n: F

TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE

West 1925 1560 3485

Middle 4014 555 4569

East 4440 24 4464

The systemwide totals in the above chart do not include 316unprocessed judgment orders. Total admissions are 12,834.

Y 20

15 -

2016

TDO

CLO

CAL

SYST

EMW

IDE

Wes

t19

2515

6034

85

Mid

dle

4014

555

4569

Eas

t44

4024

4464

The

sys

tem

wid

e to

tals

in th

e ab

ove

char

t do

not i

nclu

de 3

16un

proc

esse

d ju

dgm

ent o

rder

s. T

otal

adm

issi

ons

are

12,8

34.


Inmate Admissions by County of Conviction: FY 2015- 2016

COUNTY # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # %

ANDERSON 158 1.5% 1 0.0% 159 1.2% LAUDERDALE 36 0.3% 1 0.0% 37 0.3%BEDFORD 149 1.4% 0 0.0% 149 1.2% LAWRENCE 123 1.2% 2 0.1% 125 1.0%BENTON 19 0.2% 0 0.0% 19 0.1% LEWIS 19 0.2% 0 0.0% 19 0.1%BLEDSOE 8 0.1% 0 0.0% 8 0.1% LINCOLN 76 0.7% 0 0.0% 76 0.6%BLOUNT 234 2.3% 2 0.1% 236 1.8% LOUDON 52 0.5% 0 0.0% 52 0.4%BRADLEY 210 2.0% 1 0.0% 211 1.6% McMINN 121 1.2% 0 0.0% 121 0.9%CAMPBELL 79 0.8% 1 0.0% 80 0.6% McNAIRY 14 0.1% 1 0.0% 15 0.1%CANNON 31 0.3% 0 0.0% 31 0.2% MACON 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3%CARROLL 37 0.4% 0 0.0% 37 0.3% MADISON 297 2.9% 2 0.1% 299 2.3%CARTER 120 1.2% 1 0.0% 121 0.9% MARION 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3%CHEATHAM 65 0.6% 0 0.0% 65 0.5% MARSHALL 65 0.6% 0 0.0% 65 0.5%CHESTER 20 0.2% 0 0.0% 20 0.2% MAURY 158 1.5% 0 0.0% 158 1.2%CLAIBORNE 91 0.9% 2 0.1% 93 0.7% MEIGS 11 0.1% 0 0.0% 11 0.1%CLAY 21 0.2% 0 0.0% 21 0.2% MONROE 106 1.0% 1 0.0% 107 0.8%COCKE 73 0.7% 1 0.0% 74 0.6% MONTGOMERY 119 1.1% 1 0.0% 120 0.9%COFFEE 124 1.2% 9 0.4% 133 1.0% MOORE 22 0.2% 0 0.0% 22 0.2%CROCKETT 22 0.2% 0 0.0% 22 0.2% MORGAN 25 0.2% 1 0.0% 26 0.2%CUMBERLAND 210 2.0% 0 0.0% 210 1.6% OBION 37 0.4% 0 0.0% 37 0.3%DAVIDSON 700 6.7% 526 24.6% 1226 9.6% OVERTON 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.3%DECATUR 15 0.1% 1 0.0% 16 0.1% PERRY 13 0.1% 0 0.0% 13 0.1%DEKALB 55 0.5% 0 0.0% 55 0.4% PICKETT 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 0.0%DICKSON 96 0.9% 1 0.0% 97 0.8% POLK 46 0.4% 0 0.0% 46 0.4%DYER 136 1.3% 1 0.0% 137 1.1% PUTNAM 195 1.9% 0 0.0% 195 1.5%FAYETTE 35 0.3% 0 0.0% 35 0.3% RHEA 28 0.3% 0 0.0% 28 0.2%FENTRESS 65 0.6% 0 0.0% 65 0.5% ROANE 55 0.5% 1 0.0% 56 0.4%FRANKLIN 61 0.6% 0 0.0% 61 0.5% ROBERTSON 120 1.2% 0 0.0% 120 0.9%GIBSON 116 1.1% 1 0.0% 117 0.9% RUTHERFORD 409 3.9% 7 0.3% 416 3.2%GILES 57 0.5% 1 0.0% 58 0.5% SCOTT 56 0.5% 0 0.0% 56 0.4%GRAINGER 60 0.6% 1 0.0% 61 0.5% SEQUATCHIE 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3%GREENE 115 1.1% 4 0.2% 119 0.9% SEVIER 137 1.3% 0 0.0% 137 1.1%GRUNDY 40 0.4% 0 0.0% 40 0.3% SHELBY 769 7.4% 1,550 72.5% 2319 18.1%HAMBLEN 247 2.4% 2 0.1% 249 1.9% SMITH 50 0.5% 0 0.0% 50 0.4%HAMILTON 366 3.5% 0 0.0% 366 2.9% STEWART 19 0.2% 0 0.0% 19 0.1%HANCOCK 51 0.5% 0 0.0% 51 0.4% SULLIVAN 369 3.6% 0 0.0% 369 2.9%HARDEMAN 57 0.5% 0 0.0% 57 0.4% SUMNER 267 2.6% 2 0.1% 269 2.1%HARDIN 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3% TIPTON 82 0.8% 0 0.0% 82 0.6%HAWKINS 108 1.0% 0 0.0% 108 0.8% TROUSDALE 38 0.4% 0 0.0% 38 0.3%HAYWOOD 27 0.3% 0 0.0% 27 0.2% UNICOI 39 0.4% 0 0.0% 39 0.3%HENDERSON 87 0.8% 0 0.0% 87 0.7% UNION 54 0.5% 0 0.0% 54 0.4%HENRY 31 0.3% 1 0.0% 32 0.2% VAN BUREN 7 0.1% 0 0.0% 7 0.1%HICKMAN 41 0.4% 1 0.0% 42 0.3% WARREN 85 0.8% 0 0.0% 85 0.7%HOUSTON 10 0.1% 0 0.0% 10 0.1% WASHINGTON 204 2.0% 2 0.1% 206 1.6%HUMPHREYS 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.3% WAYNE 45 0.4% 1 0.0% 46 0.4%JACKSON 9 0.1% 0 0.0% 9 0.1% WEAKLEY 33 0.3% 2 0.1% 35 0.3%JEFFERSON 115 1.1% 3 0.1% 118 0.9% WHITE 78 0.8% 2 0.1% 80 0.6%JOHNSON 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3% WILLIAMSON 140 1.3% 0 0.0% 140 1.1%KNOX 939 9.0% 0 0.0% 939 7.3% WILSON 160 1.5% 2 0.1% 162 1.3%LAKE 14 0.1% 0 0.0% 14 0.1% Unknown 316 2%

TOTAL 10,379 100% 2,139 100% 12,834 100%

TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE

.


Felon Inmate Population by County of Conviction: FY 2015 – 2016

COUNTY # % # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # % # %

ANDERSON 163 0.8% 113 1.8% 4 0.1% 280 0.9% LAUDERDALE 102 0.5% 33 0.5% 14 0.5% 149 0.5%

BEDFORD 326 1.6% 50 0.8% 1 0.0% 377 1.3% LAWRENCE 159 0.8% 114 1.8% 3 0.1% 276 0.9%

BENTON 37 0.2% 16 0.3% 1 0.0% 54 0.2% LEWIS 33 0.2% 14 0.2% 2 0.1% 49 0.2%

BLEDSOE 20 0.1% 13 0.2% 0 0.0% 33 0.1% LINCOLN 125 0.6% 52 0.8% 3 0.1% 180 0.6%

BLOUNT 287 1.4% 125 2.0% 6 0.2% 418 1.4% LOUDON 62 0.3% 44 0.7% 11 0.4% 117 0.4%

BRADLEY 340 1.6% 114 1.8% 5 0.2% 459 1.5% McMINN 128 0.6% 143 2.3% 2 0.1% 273 0.9%

CAMPBELL 118 0.6% 98 1.6% 1 0.0% 217 0.7% McNAIRY 36 0.2% 17 0.3% 6 0.2% 59 0.2%

CANNON 61 0.3% 8 0.1% 2 0.1% 71 0.2% MACON 45 0.2% 44 0.7% 1 0.0% 90 0.3%

CARROLL 64 0.3% 33 0.5% 1 0.0% 98 0.3% MADISON 794 3.8% 54 0.9% 4 0.1% 852 2.8%

CARTER 112 0.5% 64 1.0% 26 0.9% 202 0.7% MARION 76 0.4% 45 0.7% 2 0.1% 123 0.4%

CHEATHAM 86 0.4% 47 0.8% 3 0.1% 136 0.5% MARSHALL 168 0.8% 47 0.8% 1 0.0% 216 0.7%

CHESTER 44 0.2% 24 0.4% 0 0.0% 68 0.2% MAURY 275 1.3% 141 2.3% 3 0.1% 419 1.4%

CLAIBORNE 83 0.4% 99 1.6% 2 0.1% 184 0.6% MEIGS 13 0.1% 18 0.3% 0 0.0% 31 0.1%

CLAY 12 0.1% 24 0.4% 1 0.0% 37 0.1% MONROE 123 0.6% 65 1.0% 0 0.0% 188 0.6%

COCKE 153 0.7% 40 0.6% 1 0.0% 194 0.6% MONTGOMERY 347 1.7% 121 1.9% 10 0.3% 478 1.6%

COFFEE 255 1.2% 59 1.0% 7 0.2% 321 1.1% MOORE 26 0.1% 15 0.2% 1 0.0% 42 0.1%

CROCKETT 43 0.2% 20 0.3% 0 0.0% 63 0.2% MORGAN 33 0.2% 11 0.2% 1 0.0% 45 0.2%

CUMBERLAND 246 1.2% 67 1.1% 1 0.0% 314 1.0% OBION 66 0.3% 46 0.7% 3 0.1% 115 0.4%

DAVIDSON 3,192 15.4% 241 3.9% 633 21.1% 4066 13.6% OVERTON 48 0.2% 28 0.5% 4 0.1% 80 0.3%

DECATUR 23 0.1% 6 0.1% 2 0.1% 31 0.1% PERRY 25 0.1% 10 0.2% 1 0.0% 36 0.1%

DEKALB 59 0.3% 47 0.8% 4 0.1% 110 0.4% PICKETT 8 0.0% 6 0.1% 1 0.0% 15 0.1%

DICKSON 102 0.5% 68 1.1% 6 0.2% 176 0.6% POLK 31 0.1% 42 0.7% 1 0.0% 74 0.2%

DYER 175 0.8% 102 1.6% 1 0.0% 278 0.9% PUTNAM 173 0.8% 160 2.6% 3 0.1% 336 1.1%

FAYETTE 40 0.2% 43 0.7% 8 0.3% 91 0.3% RHEA 67 0.3% 23 0.4% 2 0.1% 92 0.3%

FENTRESS 67 0.3% 53 0.9% 1 0.0% 121 0.4% ROANE 65 0.3% 32 0.5% 7 0.2% 104 0.3%

FRANKLIN 126 0.6% 35 0.6% 9 0.3% 170 0.6% ROBERTSON 84 0.4% 92 1.5% 12 0.4% 188 0.6%

GIBSON 117 0.6% 93 1.5% 2 0.1% 212 0.7% RUTHERFORD 698 3.4% 135 2.2% 14 0.5% 847 2.8%

GILES 111 0.5% 24 0.4% 3 0.1% 138 0.5% SCOTT 71 0.3% 59 1.0% 2 0.1% 132 0.4%

GRAINGER 87 0.4% 56 0.9% 3 0.1% 146 0.5% SEQUATCHIE 50 0.2% 41 0.7% 0 0.0% 91 0.3%

GREENE 120 0.6% 78 1.3% 4 0.1% 202 0.7% SEVIER 287 1.4% 150 2.4% 13 0.4% 450 1.5%

GRUNDY 79 0.4% 35 0.6% 4 0.1% 118 0.4% SHELBY 3409 16.4% 321 5.2% 1,467 48.8% 5197 17.3%

HAMBLEN 207 1.0% 113 1.8% 20 0.7% 340 1.1% SMITH 51 0.2% 44 0.7% 0 0.0% 95 0.3%

HAMILTON 744 3.6% 87 1.4% 18 0.6% 849 2.8% STEWART 10 0.0% 21 0.3% 0 0.0% 31 0.1%

HANCOCK 29 0.1% 30 0.5% 1 0.0% 60 0.2% SULLIVAN 718 3.5% 237 3.8% 21 0.7% 976 3.3%

HARDEMAN 66 0.3% 53 0.9% 12 0.4% 131 0.4% SUMNER 398 1.9% 236 3.8% 29 1.0% 663 2.2%

HARDIN 61 0.3% 42 0.7% 1 0.0% 104 0.3% TIPTON 189 0.9% 32 0.5% 10 0.3% 231 0.8%

HAWKINS 101 0.5% 101 1.6% 4 0.1% 206 0.7% TROUSDALE 29 0.1% 30 0.5% 0 0.0% 59 0.2%

HAYWOOD 35 0.2% 43 0.7% 1 0.0% 79 0.3% UNICOI 33 0.2% 16 0.3% 7 0.2% 56 0.2%

HENDERSON 75 0.4% 90 1.5% 2 0.1% 167 0.6% UNION 78 0.4% 17 0.3% 1 0.0% 96 0.3%

HENRY 57 0.3% 34 0.5% 1 0.0% 92 0.3% VAN BUREN 12 0.1% 6 0.1% 0 0.0% 18 0.1%

HICKMAN 55 0.3% 38 0.6% 0 0.0% 93 0.3% WARREN 162 0.8% 59 1.0% 6 0.2% 227 0.8%

HOUSTON 23 0.1% 10 0.2% 2 0.1% 35 0.1% WASHINGTON 193 0.9% 144 2.3% 37 1.2% 374 1.2%

HUMPHREYS 35 0.2% 19 0.0% 1 0.0% 55 0.2% WAYNE 56 0.3% 41 0.7% 0 0.0% 97 0.3%

JACKSON 23 0.1% 7 0.1% 0 0.0% 30 0.1% WEAKLEY 36 0.2% 30 0.5% 0 0.0% 66 0.2%

JEFFERSON 201 1.0% 119 1.9% 4 0.1% 324 1.1% WHITE 66 0.3% 53 0.9% 5 0.2% 124 0.4%

JOHNSON 51 0.2% 19 0.3% 18 0.6% 88 0.3% WILLIAMSON 233 1.1% 88 1.4% 0 0.0% 321 1.1%KNOX 2074 10.0% 170 2.7% 14 0.5% 2258 7.5% WILSON 226 1.1% 139 2.2% 2 0.1% 367 1.2%

LAKE 34 0.2% 20 0.3% 0 0.0% 54 0.2% PENDING 8 0% 0 0% 452 15% 460 1.5%

TOTAL 20,744 100% 6,206 100% 3005 100% 29,955 100%

TDOC BACKUP LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC BACKUP LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE


Total Community Supervision Felon Population: June 30, 2016

Total Community Supervision Population

Source: Tennessee Felon Population Updates

Parole & Probation Population by District – June 30, 2016

Probation 58,256Parole 12,678

Community Corrections 7,891Total 78,825

District Parole Probation Total

10 815 4,624 5,43920 1,202 5,553 6,75521 470 2,922 3,39230 1,033 6,454 7,48731 503 2,254 2,75740 103 3,085 3,18841 507 1,935 2,44242 1,842 1,815 3,65750 824 3,556 4,38051 529 2,639 3,16860 629 2,168 2,79761 805 2,386 3,19170 298 185 48371 745 3,141 3,88672 1,139 4,298 5,43780 398 2,402 2,80081 570 2,431 3,001

OIC 266 6,407 6,673Unassigned 0 1 1

TOTAL 12,678 58,256 70,934.


COMMUNITY SUPERVISION DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, RACE

Community Supervision Population by Age (Systemwide) June 30, 2016

65+ 1,059 1.8% 549 4.3% 78 1.0% 1,686 2.1%60-64 1,415 2.4% 551 4.3% 139 1.8% 2,105 2.7%55-59 2,822 4.8% 963 7.6% 349 4.4% 4,134 5.2%50-54 4,349 7.5% 1,348 10.6% 508 6.4% 6,205 7.9%45-49 5,392 9.3% 1,508 11.9% 728 9.2% 7,628 9.7%40-44 6,647 11.4% 1,689 13.3% 996 12.6% 9,332 11.8%35-39 8,782 15.1% 2,214 17.5% 1,402 17.8% 12,398 15.7%30-34 9,840 16.9% 2,066 16.3% 1,562 19.8% 13,468 17.1%25-29 10,178 17.5% 1,420 11.2% 1,374 17.4% 12,972 16.5%20-24 7,249 12.4% 364 2.9% 727 9.2% 8,340 10.6%18-19 517 0.9% 5 0.0% 28 0.4% 550 0.7%<18 6 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 0.0%Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 58,256 100% 12,678 100% 7,891 100% 78,825 100%

Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %



Black34%

White63%

Other3%

Community Supervision Population by Sex and Race (Systemwide) June 30, 2016

Community Supervision Population by Sex, Race, and Type of Supervision

Male76%

Female24%

MaleBlack 15,488 36.1% 4,939 44.6% 1,835 32.1% 22,262White 25,708 60.0% 5,698 51.4% 3,736 65.4% 35,142Asian 236 0.6% 47 0.4% 12 0.2% 295Hispanic 1,380 3.2% 388 3.5% 124 2.2% 1,892Native American 53 0.1% 9 0.1% 3 0.1% 65Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1Total Male 42,865 100.0% 11,081 100.0% 5,711 100.0% 59,657

FemaleBlack 3,880 25.2% 393 24.6% 348 16.0% 4,621 White 11,249 73.1% 1,172 73.4% 1,814 83.2% 14,235 Asian 46 0.3% 4 0.3% 2 0.1% 52 Hispanic 195 1.3% 19 1.2% 13 0.6% 227 Native American 21 0.1% 9 0.6% 3 0.1% 33 Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Total Female 15,391 100.0% 1,597 100.0% 2,180 100.0% 19,168

TOTAL 58,256 73.9% 12,678 16.1% 7,891 10.0% 78,825

Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % Systemwide


.


Community Supervision Admissions by Age, Race and Sex: FY 2015-2016

Community Supervision Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2015-2016

Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %

65+ 199 1.1% 57 1.4% 18 0.6% 274 1.1%60-64 271 1.5% 91 2.2% 31 1.1% 393 1.6%55-59 620 3.4% 185 4.5% 77 2.7% 882 3.5%50-54 981 5.3% 309 7.6% 137 4.9% 1,427 5.7%45-49 1,326 7.2% 426 10.4% 205 7.3% 1,957 7.8%40-44 1,727 9.4% 496 12.1% 302 10.8% 2,525 10.0%35-39 2,376 12.9% 733 17.9% 438 15.6% 3,547 14.1%30-34 3,007 16.4% 769 18.8% 593 21.1% 4,369 17.3%25-29 3,510 19.1% 695 17.0% 549 19.6% 4,754 18.8%20-24 3,552 19.4% 316 7.7% 407 14.5% 4,275 16.9%18-19 768 4.2% 9 0.2% 45 1.6% 822 3.3%<18 13 0.1% 0 0.0% 2 0.1% 15 0.1%TOTAL 18,350 4,086 2,804 25,240

RACE Probation % Parole % Community Corrections

% SYSTEMWIDE %

Black 6,363 34.7% 1,540 37.7% 680 24.3% 8,583 34.0%White 11,551 62.9% 2,472 60.5% 2,089 74.5% 16,112 63.8%Asian 83 0.5% 11 0.3% 3 0.1% 97 0.4%


TOTAL 18,350 4,086 2,804 25,240

Sex Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %

Male 13,444 73.3% 3,493 85.5% 2033 72.5% 18,970 75.2%Female 4,906 26.7% 593 14.5% 771 27.5% 6,270 24.8%TOTAL 18,350 4,086 2,804 25,240


Probation % Parole % Community Corrections

% SYSTEMWIDE %

65+ 289 1.7% 100 2.2% 14 0.6% 403 1.7%60-64 403 2.3% 121 2.7% 35 1.6% 559 2.3%55-59 780 4.5% 202 4.4% 74 3.4% 1,056 4.4%50-54 1,144 6.7% 384 8.4% 116 5.3% 1,644 6.9%45-49 1,424 8.3% 468 10.3% 186 8.4% 2,078 8.7%40-44 1,821 10.6% 643 14.1% 246 11.2% 2,710 11.3%35-39 2,362 13.7% 830 18.2% 330 15.0% 3,522 14.7%30-34 2,962 17.2% 845 18.5% 455 20.6% 4,262 17.8%25-29 3,292 19.2% 720 15.8% 471 21.4% 4,483 18.7%20-24 2,585 15.0% 246 5.4% 276 12.5% 3,107 13.0%18-19 116 0.7% 2 0.0% 3 0.1% 121 0.5%<18 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0%TOTAL 17,179 4,561 2,206 23,946

RACE Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %

Black 5,784 33.7% 1,807 39.6% 536 262.2% 8,127 33.9%White 10,993 64.0% 2,677 58.7% 1,654 498.3% 15,324 64.0%Asian 79 0.5% 9 0.2% 1 0.0% 89 0.4%


TOTAL 17,179 4,561 2,206 23,946

Sex Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %

Male 12,515 72.9% 3,834 84.1% 1,598 72.4% 17,947 74.9%Female 4,664 27.1% 727 15.9% 608 27.6% 5,999 25.1%

TOTAL 17,179 4,561 2,206 23,946Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System


COMMUNITY SUPERVISION ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES FY 2015 – 2016

Community Supervision Releases by Type: FY 2015-2016

TYPE Probation % Parole % Community Corrections

% SYSTEMWIDE %

Death 437 2.5% 146 3.2% 50 2.3% 633 2.6%Discharges & Expirations 11,281 65.7% 2,662 58.4% 604 27.4% 14,547 60.7%Revocation, Positive Drug Test 315 1.8% 18 0.4% 213 9.7% 546 2.3%Revocation, New Charge 2,561 14.9% 991 21.7% 407 18.4% 3,959 16.5%Revocation, New Charge Pending 547 3.2% 402 8.8% 68 3.1% 1,017 4.2%Revocation, Technical 2,038 11.9% 342 7.5% 864 39.2% 3,244 13.5%

TOTAL 17,179 4,561 2,206 23,946

.


Offender Accountability, Programs & Services

.

Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 45

Total Hours and Estimated Value of Inmate Community Service Work FY 2015 - 2016

Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work by Community Supervision FY 2015 - 2016

1st. 2nd 3rd 4th. FACILITYQuarter Quarter Quarter Quarter TOTAL

BCCX 4,921 5,588 4,988 8,001 23,498HCCF MCCX 20,732 16,564 16,798 17,250 71,344MLCC 4,780 4,436 4,697 4,687 18,600NECX 33,413 32,706 33,916 33,056 133,091NWCX 2,435 2,783 4,620 6,690 16,528RMSI 26,727 31,383 25,504 36,672 120,286SPNDSCCF 1,726 1,765 1,953 1,408 6,852TPFW 0TTCCTCIX 59,144 58,887 55,996 56,670 230,697WTSP 15,057 13,870 15,434 162 44,523WCFASYSTEM 168,935 167,982 163,906 164,596 665,419TOTAL SAVINGS: Dollar Value @ Minimum Wage $4,824,288Note: Mimimum wage = $7.25/hr.

1st. 2nd 3rd 4th. DISTRICTQuarter Quarter Quarter Quarter TOTAL

District 10 5,725 5,129 4,397 2,506 17,756 District 20 2,111 2,110 2,161 2,701 9,083 District 21 1,769 1,294 915 1,220 5,197 District 30 200 237 414 837 1,688 District 31 373 608 517 588 2,086 District 40, 41, 42 2,779 2,257 1,926 2,988 9,948 District 50 1,843 1,130 2,317 1,204 6,494 District 51 1,542 1,592 1,972 1,674 6,780 District 60 2,001 2,835 2,642 2,614 10,092 District 61 860 917 628 321 2,725 District 70, 71, 72 3,969 3,382 4,169 3,617 15,135 District 80 927 340 1,064 264 2,595 District 81 260 259 254 994 1,766 SYSTEM 24,356 22,088 23,374 21,526 91,344 TOTAL SAVINGS: Dollar Value @ Minimum Wage $662,245Note: Mimimum wage = $7.25/hr.

.


INMATE PROGRAM ASSIGNMENTS

Percentage of

Assignment Inmates PopulationAcademic Education 1,838 8.86%Vocational Programs 1,382 6.66%Support 5,498 26.50%Program Services 1,113 5.37%Recycling 99 0.48%TRICOR 948 4.57%Work Lines 229 1.10%Other Agencies 84 0.40%Community Service 416 2.01%Work Release 34 0.16%Cognitive Behavioral Programming 1,708 8.23%Behavioral Programming 1,114 5.37%Mental Health Programs 447 2.15%Tech. Violators Diversion Program 40 0.19%Release Center 29 0.14%Boot Camp/SAIU 39 0.19%Other 719 3.47%Total Assigned 15,737 75.86%Unassignable Status* 2,164 10.43%Job Waiting List 2,843 13.71%TOTAL INMATES 20,744 100.00%% of Eligible Inmates Assigned 89.6%

in segregation or initial classification, etc.

INMATE ASSIGMENTSJune 30, 2016

*Inmates who can not be assigned due to their status, which may include those


DRUG SCREENS: FY 2015 – 2016 Random drug screens are conducted monthly on 2.5% of the inmate population. These screens are necessary to identify the use of substances frequently used in prison. Substance abuse program participants are given an initial urine screen at the beginning of the program and are subject to facility random and reasonable suspicion testing throughout the program. All positive screens are confirmed through additional testing, and graduated sanctions are used for any positive drug screen.

Inmate Drug Screens

Although the number of drug screenings administered increased from 2,780 in FY 2015 to 3,188 in FY 2016 (15%), the percentage of positive drug screens only increased slightly more than 2%.

1st 878 45 5.13% 3.01% 2.45%2nd 757 48 6.34% 5.08% 1.94%3rd 943 69 7.32% 4.74% 3.28%4th 610 64 10.49% 5.86% 3.89%Yearly 3188 226 7.09% 4.86% 2.99%

FY 2016 FY 2015 %

Positive

FY 2014 %

Positive

SA Program

Average FY 2016

Quarter Number Tested

# Positive/

% Positive/

7.09%

.


INMATE EDUCATION: FY 2015 – 2016

VOCATIONALINSTITUTION NUMBER NUMBER PERCENTAGE NUMBER

TESTED PASSED PASSED COMPLETIONSBCCX 87 50 57% 294DSNF 2 1 50% 42HCCF 59 45 76% 317MCCX 102 54 53% 270MLCC 50 14 28% 95NECX 116 53 46% 401NWCX 137 75 55% 326RMSI 37 20 54% 117SCCF 95 41 43% 216TCIX 60 35 58% 116TPFW 35 23 66% 93TTCC 18 16 89% 0WCFA 34 24 71% 139WTSP 81 48 59% 185YEARLYTOTALS

TEST RESULTS 2015 - 2016HiSET COMPLETIONS

913 499 55% 2611

FY 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016GED / HiSET 685 786 737 710 700 640 618 460* 290* 499Vocational 1,365 1,342 1,468 1,585 2,282 3,676 3,672 2,927 2,938 2,611

*G.E.D. HiSET

*Due to the transition from GED to HiSET, there were fewer exams administered in the last of FY14 & first of FY15.

High School Equivalency & Vocational Certificates: FY 2007-2016

Full-Time Part-Time Full-time Part-TimeBCCX 673 0 0 98 6 752 0 1529DSNF 38 0 0 0 1 36 0 75HCCF 2168 0 0 0 1 645 0 2814MCCX 1062 0 0 61 28 598 0 1749MLCC 77 0 0 0 2 199 0 278NECX 769 0 0 0 3 1275 0 2047NWCX 1016 0 0 0 27 1067 0 2110RMSI 125 0 0 45 21 174 0 365SCCF 716 0 0 0 13 382 0 1111TCIX 381 0 0 0 138 195 0 714

TPFW 370 0 0 18 90 192 0 670TTCC 197 0 0 0 0 13 0 210WCFA 979 0 0 0 2 539 0 1520WTSP 474 0 0 169 13 555 0 1211

YEARLY TOTALS 9,045 0 0 391 345 6,622 0 16,403

EDUCATIONAL ENROLLMENT: FY 2015-2016

INSTITUTION

ABE/HiSET SEGREGATED Closed Circuit

TVVOLUNTEER

LITERACY COLLEGE

VOCATIONAL

TOTAL

Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 49 REHABILITATIVE SERVICES DIVISION Office of Clinical Services The Office of Clinical Services operates under the leadership of the Assistant Commissioner of Rehabilitative Services. The Office of Clinical Services supports the mission of the TDOC by providing quality healthcare in the most efficient, cost effective, and ethical manner possible to its more than 20,000 inmates, while protecting the public health interest of the citizens of Tennessee. Upon intake into our prison system, all offenders receive extensive medical, mental health, dental and substance use screening and testing to identify their health status and treatment needs. Each of the Department’s facilities provides an on-site health clinic that offers a full range of healthcare services (e.g., daily sick call visits, chronic disease clinics, dental care, case management pharmacy, utilization management, inpatient services, out-patient services, infirmary services, tele-health, tele-psychiatry suicide crisis intervention, and emergency care). Health Services Health Services strives for the provision of essential medical and dental care and the elimination of costly expenditures attributed to unnecessary procedures through extensive inpatient utilization management efforts, statewide nursing skill assessment, and development and clinical case management. The goal of utilization management is to encourage the highest quality, in the most appropriate setting, from the most appropriate provider. Through the utilization management program the Department seeks to avoid overuse of medical services by making clinical decisions based on available evidence based guidelines. The Nursing Skills Development Program ensures that all TDOC nurses are both competent and up to date in their ability to utilize each facility’s infirmary to its full potential, thus decreasing the number of inmates needing costly emergency room treatment and hospitalization for minor and chronic conditions. This also allows for shorter inpatient days when hospitalization is medically indicated and a quicker return to the inmate’s assigned facility, due to follow up care being performed on site (i.e. completion of IV antibiotics and limited chemotherapeutic agents). Additionally, Control measures have been established to track hospital admissions and transfers to the emergency room. One of the newer programs implemented was On-site Chemotherapy Infusion Program (OChIP). This program further reduces the number of days a patient would have to remain in the hospital for their treatment. New innovations to reduce inpatient stays include the implementation of the Regional Infirmary system. This program has facilitated placing sub-acutely ill patients at regional sites, thereby reducing overall hospital stays. Finally, the endoscopy program utilizes onsite services to avoid costly hospital admissions. .

50 2016 Statistical Abstract Hospital admissions initially decreased in FY 2013. Admissions have remained fairly constant averaging approximately 735 admissions per year over the past four fiscal year periods (see Figure 1). Telehealth has increased approximately 428% from 2013 to present (see Figure 2).

Figure 2

Tennessee Department of Correction Collaborates with Tennessee Department of Health In October 2015, the TB Elimination Program, HIV/STD & Viral Hepatitis Program, Information Technology Services Division and Laboratory Services of Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) collaborated with the Tennessee Department of Correction (TDOC) to screen and test all new male and female inmates for TB infection, HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia. Results: Following pilot testing at both facilities, from December 2015 through May 2016 a total of 16,166 tests for five diseases were obtained. The aggregate test positivity rates were: TB infection – 5.0%; HIV infection – 0.8%; syphilis – 1.0%; gonorrhea – 2.2%; and chlamydia – 0.2%; positivity rates differed by gender. The combined IGRA indeterminate test rate was <0.2%. Conclusion: Integrated prison intake screening for five diseases of public health importance has been successfully implemented in Tennessee. PCSI provides opportunities for disease surveillance, diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Behavioral Health Services Behavioral Health Services sets policy standards for the delivery of mental health, substance use, and sex offender treatment services, and evaluates the care provided throughout the TDOC system. The goals are to (1) reduce the debilitating effects of serious mental illness and maximize each inmate’s ability to participate in programs while maintaining a safe prison environment for inmates and staff, and (2) help prepare inmates with mental illness, substance use, and/or sex offender treatment needs to successfully transition from incarceration back to the community. Behavioral Health Services collaborates with mental health and substance use treatment vendors to provide specialty services (e.g., psychology, psychiatry, and substance use treatment). A continuum of services is provided including psychological assessment, case management, medication management, crisis intervention, individual/group therapy, substance use treatment services, and sex offender treatment.

• Standardized the curriculum for Centers of Excellence Level III and Level IV Supportive Living Units (SLU) at Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, DeBerry Special Needs Facility, Morgan County Correctional Complex, Northwest Correctional Complex; South Central Correctional Facility, Tennessee Prison for Women, and West Tennessee State Prison, to comprehensively address offenders’ mental health and criminogenic needs.

• Expanded the use of telehealth for the delivery of psychiatric services. • Maintained the percentage of inmates on polypharmacy (four or more psychotropic medications) to less than

4.0%. • Implemented a Behavioral Health Model to integrate mental health and substance use treatment services at all

facilities. • Expanded services to inmates on restrictive housing at TPFW, BCCX, and NECX.

Figure 1


• Expanded substance use treatment services to provide programming and a Licensed Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselor at every facility. These increased services will enable the Department to provide services to approximately 1,868 inmates on a yearly basis, serving 9.3% of Tennessee’s incarcerated population. Increased collaboration between the Case Managers, Correctional Counselors, and Forensic Social Workers to ensure inmates with severe mental illness and/or substance use issues receive appropriate mental health care upon reentry back to the community.

• In collaboration with our mental health vendor, maintained a web-based reentry portal to identify community resources such as housing, transportation, medical care, etc., that are available throughout the state to assist offenders in overcoming barriers that commonly pose a challenge to successful transition back to the community.

Behavioral Health Services has continued to utilize standardized protocols and guidelines for community transition of inmates with mental illness. The focus is treatment team effectiveness, case management, and transition/reentry of offenders with special mental health needs. Behavioral Health Services supports the use of behavioral and cognitive-behavioral interventions as an alternative to the exclusive reliance on psychotropic medication in addressing offenders’ mental health issues. The number of offenders with mental health needs continues to pose a challenge to TDOC. At fiscal year-end 2016, there were approximately 5,743 offenders who receive treatment for a diagnosed mental disorder. This number includes those in Levels of Care II, III, & IV; however, it excludes those offenders who are participating in treatment for a substance use disorder. General Discussion Approximately 20% of the offender population is receiving psychotropic medication for a mental illness. Inmates are assessed for their level of mental health functioning in accordance with a Levels of Care (LOC) system. The increase in the number of offenders receiving mental health treatment this fiscal year is 3%. The rate of growth is lower than the previous two years (29% and 8% respectively). Mental health treatment resources available through the continued implementation of the behavioral health contract reflect a more accurate assessment of the true mental health needs of the offender population. .

Office of Quality Assurance and Improvement The Office of Quality Assurance and Improvement (QAI) was established to ensure resources, including education, and treatment and programming, are delivered to offenders according to validated risk and needs assessment tools or clinical need in order to support successful reentry into the community. QAI managers audit programming in the institutions (e.g.,

52 2016 Statistical Abstract academic/vocational, jobs, religious/social services) and community supervision offices (Thinking for a Change, Victims Impact and Stopping Abuse for Everyone- S.A.F.E.) to ensure compliance with TDOC policy and ACA standards. In addition, the office is responsible for Rehabilitative Services’ Ombudsman duties which include the investigation and resolution of offender inquiries about all rehabilitative services concerns (e.g., clinical, educational, jobs, religious/social services) while incarcerated in TDOC institutions.

QAI is also the repository for the collection, analysis, and reporting of data for Customer Focused Government (CFG), Governor Haslam’s initiative in which Tennessee state government agencies focus on offering the best service at the lowest possible cost. Data submitted from each facility is reviewed at weekly and monthly intervals to ensure offenders are receiving the most efficient and effective programs and services, and that those programs and services prepare offenders for a successful transition back to the community.

The QAI office also reinforces a corrective action process in which facilities that report below average results for any CFG measure are required to develop a plan of action with the objective of identifying most effective actions to correct error causes, improving processes so outcomes are more effective and efficient, achieving measurable improvement, and eliminating repeated deficient practices.

On the whole, the Office of Quality Assurance and Improvement incorporates a collaborative, evidence-based approach to measuring correctional intervention effectiveness through a continuous assessment process. This approach focuses on ongoing improvements from established benchmarks and measures, while ensuring programs are producing meaningful outcomes, such as customer service and preparing inmates for reentry, with the goal of reducing recidivism.

Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation The Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation is a unit within Rehabilitative Services that is tasked with reducing recidivism through the following evidence-based programs and services:

• Risk/Needs Assessment • Inmate Jobs • Reentry Services • Volunteer and Social Services • Education • Cognitive-Behavioral Programming • Offender Workforce Development • Housing • Counseling Services • Victim Services

The Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation is continuously striving to develop best practices for the offender assessment, classification, case management and reentry services that are necessary to ensure offender reentry plans and program case plans are developed for each offender. The reentry plans and program case plans are specific to each offender and will be used throughout their incarceration to ensure that all their recommended program, education, and reentry needs are met. The Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation has expanded its cognitive behavioral programming and reentry services to include offenders assigned to community supervision in order to ensure continuity in the delivery of the offender’s programmatic needs. The Office of Offender Development is responsible for ensuring all offenders have access to educational, vocational and post-secondary educational opportunities, and for issuance of state identification, housing assistance, and employment assistance for offenders. The Office of Offender Development is also responsible for recruitment of volunteers and for oversight of community partnerships such as the “Take One” program. Take One is a program designed to provide mentorship and positive role models to offenders and their families in adjusting to society during the first year of release.


Demographics


Demographics 55


Prison Security Designations: June 30, 2016

Inmate Population Custody Levels: June 30, 2016

County Facility Security DesignationJohnson Northeast Correctional Complex Minimum - MaximumMorgan Morgan County Correctional Complex Minimum - MaximumBledsoe Bledsoe County Correctional Complex Minimum - CloseTrousdale Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex Minimum - MediumDavidson DeBerry Special Needs Facility Minimum - Maximum

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Minimum - MaximumTennessee Prison for Women Minimum - Maximum

Hickman Turney Center Industrial Complex Minimum - CloseWayne South Central Correctional Facility Minimum - CloseHardeman Hardeman County Correctional Facility Minimum - Medium

Whiteville Correctional Facility Minimum - MediumShelby Mark Luttrell Correctional Center Minimum - MediumLauderdale West Tennessee State Penitentiary Minimum - MaximumLake Northwest Correctional Complex Minimum - Close

Prison Custody Level

Number of Inmates

Percent of Total

Maximum 508 2.4%Close 781 3.8%Medium 16,157 77.9%Minimum 3,006 14.5%Unclassified 292 1.4%TOTAL 20,744 100.0%

Institution Average Daily Population

Bledsoe County Correctional Complex 2,434DeBerry Special Needs Facility 656Hardeman County Correctional Facility 1,998Mark Luttrell Correctional Center 426Morgan County Correctional Complex 2,125Northeast Correctional Complex 1,801Northwest Correctional Complex 2,353Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 777South Central Correctional Facility 1,671Tennessee Prison for Women 770Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex 1192*Turney Center Industrial Complex 1,560Whiteville Correctional Facility 1,530West Tennessee State Penitentiary 1,590System Total 20,260Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex began housing inmates in January 2016.*TTCC did not house inmates for full year - only 177 days.Source: TDOC Bed Space and Operating Capacities Report

Average Daily Population: FY 2015 - 2016

Demographics 57

Demographics by Facility June 30, 2016

65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age

BCCX 50 68 116 204 287 317 401 405 372 216 16 0 38.6DSNF 72 43 61 70 83 71 91 69 60 17 3 0 46.1HCCF 41 49 99 166 193 241 326 334 361 174 7 0 38.1MCCX 43 54 98 143 177 272 344 390 425 281 6 0 36.7MLCC 5 9 13 25 42 51 78 80 94 31 0 0 36.8NECX 77 69 128 181 215 241 288 231 227 128 3 0 41.2NWCX 63 78 143 178 252 305 379 344 377 209 22 5 38.9RMSI 22 26 37 86 84 95 150 124 90 52 0 0 40.1SCCF 40 51 98 154 186 230 271 262 232 129 4 0 39.6TCIX 28 32 72 130 161 201 258 253 246 203 9 0 37.5TPFW 13 9 37 54 89 120 138 154 129 45 0 0 38.3TTCC 22 41 66 105 158 200 272 316 308 195 18 0 36.5WCFA 38 36 71 93 134 169 248 302 275 150 5 0 37.4WTSP 9 22 46 57 92 100 99 141 149 111 5 0 37.0

SYSTEM 523 587 1,085 1,646 2,153 2,613 3,343 3,405 3,345 1,941 98 5 38.5

AGE

Asian Black HispanicNative

American White Male Female

BCCX 7 732 34 5 1674 2149 303DSNF 3 276 8 2 351 640 0HCCF 3 954 46 3 985 1991 0MCCX 2 1033 43 1 1154 2233 0MLCC 2 161 6 3 256 0 428NECX 3 770 49 1 965 1788 0NWCX 5 1151 66 4 1129 2355 0RMSI 4 409 14 1 338 766 0SCCF 5 823 52 2 775 1657 0TCIX 6 784 47 3 753 1593 0TPFW 2 196 11 2 577 0 788TTCC 9 829 46 1 816 1701 0WCFA 2 775 37 1 706 1521 0WTSP 1 478 11 1 340 831 0SYSTEM 54 9371 470 30 10819 19225 1519

RACE SEX


Facility Populations by Primary Offense: June 30, 2016

Incidents: FY 2015 – 2016

BCCX DSNF HCCF MCCX MLCC NECX NWCX RMSI SCCF TCIX TPFW TTCC WCFA WTSPFacility Population 2,452 640 1,991 2,233 428 1,788 2,355 766 1,657 1,593 788 1,701 1,521 831

OFFENSEPERSON OFFENSES 35% 63% 44% 41% 44% 60% 45% 55% 60% 51% 38% 44% 46% 48% Homicide 11% 27% 13% 17% 24% 31% 15% 36% 26% 25% 20% 11% 14% 23% Kidnapping 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% Sex Offenses 12% 22% 17% 9% 3% 15% 15% 6% 21% 13% 3% 15% 15% 9% Assault 11% 12% 13% 14% 16% 12% 13% 11% 12% 12% 14% 16% 16% 14%PROPERTY OFFENSES 32% 16% 34% 32% 26% 22% 27% 26% 20% 26% 28% 33% 30% 34% Arson 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% Burglary 12% 5% 10% 9% 5% 6% 8% 6% 5% 7% 6% 9% 8% 7% Forgery/Fraud 2% 0% 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% Larceny/Theft 7% 2% 4% 5% 6% 2% 4% 3% 2% 3% 9% 4% 3% 4% Robbery 11% 9% 18% 17% 11% 13% 14% 16% 13% 15% 9% 18% 17% 22%SOCIETAL OFFENSES 24% 17% 15% 21% 20% 13% 21% 15% 14% 19% 24% 20% 18% 12% Drugs/Narcotics 22% 15% 14% 20% 19% 12% 20% 14% 13% 19% 22% 19% 17% 11% Vehicular Homicide/DUI 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1%ALL OTHER OFFENSES 9% 4% 7% 5% 10% 5% 6% 3% 5% 4% 10% 4% 6% 5% C/S/F Person* 1% 1% 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% C/S/F Property* 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% C/S/F Societal* 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% Escape 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% All Other** 6% 3% 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% 2% 3% 2% 5% 2% 4% 4%TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 101% 100% 99%

**Includes eight (8) unprocessed judgment orders.*C/S/F = Refers to non-substantive offenses such as conspiracy, solicitation, facilitation, aiding and abetting, etc.

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total

Rape 0 0 1 0 1Weapon Offenses 421 432 484 420 1757Drug Offenses 358 337 337 495 1527STG Offenses 194 149 185 174 702Riot 0 0 0 0 0Sexual Misconduct 319 298 279 369 1265AssaultAssault on Offender 105 104 97 85 391Assault on Staff 84 96 164 134 478DeathHomicide 0 0 1 1 2Suicide 1 0 2 1 4Accidental Death 0 0 0 0 0Natural Death 25 33 22 27 107Lethal Injection 0 0 0 0 0EscapeSecure Supervision 0 0 0 0 0Minimum Security 0 0 0 0 0Minimum Security - Work Crew - Supervised 1 0 0 0 1Minimum Security - Work Crew - Unsupervised 0 0 0 0 0Furlough/Pass 0 0 0 0 0

Total Incident Rate (per 100 inmates) 19.29 18.65 16.91 18.36 73.22Data source: Incident Report June 30, 2016

Incidents FY 2016

Demographics 59

TDO

C IN

CID

ENT

SUM

MA

RY:

FY

2015

– 2

016

Plea

se n

ote

that

inci

dent

s rep

orte

d m

ay in

clud

e m

ore

than

one

par

ticip

ant w

hile

oth

er in

cide

nts a

re b

y de

finiti

on a

bout

a si

ngle

par

ticip

ant (

ex: d

eath

or s

uici

de).

SO

UR

CE:

Thi

s rep

ort s

umm

ariz

es d

ata

ente

red

by F

acili

ty O

pera

tions

’ per

sonn

el in

acc

orda

nce

with

TD

OC

pol

icy

103.

02.

BC

CX

HC

CF

MC

CX

MLR

CN

ECX

NW

CX

RM

SISC

CF

SPN

DTC

IXTP

FWTT

CC

WC

FAW

TSP

SYST

EMBl

edso

e C

ount

y C

orre

ctio

nal

Com

plex

Har

dem

an

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Mor

gan

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Mar

k H

. Lu

ttrel

l C

ente

r

Nor

thea

st

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Nor

thw

est

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Riv

erbe

nd

Max

imum

Se

curit

y In

stitu

tion

Sout

h C

entra

l C

orre

ctio

nal

Faci

lity

DeB

erry

Sp

ecia

l N

eeds

Fa

cilit

y

Turn

ey

Cen

ter

Indu

stria

l C

ompl

ex

TN P

rison

fo

r Wom

en

Trou

sdal

e Tu

rner

C

orre

ctio

nal

Cen

ter

Whi

tevi

lle

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Wes

t TN

St

ate

Peni

tent

iary

Ave

rage

Pop

ulat

ion

2361

1977

2101

414

1784

2313

770

1648

759

1542

785

585

1507

1554

2010

0In

c Ty

peIn

ciden

t Des

cript

ionA

rrest

AFO

FELO

NY

-OFN

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

rrest

AFS

FELO

NY

-STA

FF3

31

01

11

20

10

08

425

Arre

stA

FVFE

LON

Y-V

ISIT

OR

43

60

40

03

01

00

13

25A

rson

ARI

SER-

INJ-

PRO

P D

MG>

$500

-OPE

R D

ISRU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Ars

onA

RDIN

JURY

-PRO

P D

MG

>$50

0-O

PR D

ISRU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Ars

onA

RPPR

OP

DM

G >$

500

OPE

R D

ISRU

P0

00

00

00

00

01

00

01

Ass

ault

AO

OO

FN-W

ITH

OU

T W

EAPO

N10

910

62

191

107

117

714

611

9A

ssau

ltA

OW

OFN

-WEA

PON

52

31

102

27

02

56

28

55A

ssau

ltA

SAST

AFF

-SER

IOU

S IN

JURY

01

10

00

00

02

00

22

8A

ssau

ltA

SBST

AFF

-INJU

RY1

10

06

11

13

20

00

218

Ass

ault

ASC

STA

FF-M

INO

R IN

JURY

46

31

513

520

63

30

99

87A

ssau

ltA

SJST

AFF

-NO

INJU

RY5

1314

01

310

108

28

05

281

Ass

ault

ASD

OFN

-SER

IOU

S IN

JURY

03

00

04

02

00

00

09

18A

ssau

ltA

SEO

FN-IN

JURY

25

32

56

23

22

10

15

39A

ssau

ltA

SFO

FN-M

INO

R IN

JURY

114

22

715

411

413

20

1419

108

Ass

ault

ASK

OFN

-NO

INJU

RY12

43

22

12

34

45

09

152

Ass

ault

ASG

VIS

-SER

IOU

S IN

JURY

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

ssau

ltA

SHV

IS-IN

JURY

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

ssau

ltA

SIV

IS-M

INO

R IN

JURY

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

ssau

ltA

SMV

IS-N

O IN

JURY

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

ssau

ltA

SOST

AFF

-WIT

HO

UT

WEA

PON

616

92

216

522

87

414

67

124

Ass

ault

ASW

STA

FF-W

EAPO

N14

1410

08

1010

1214

117

924

1716

0A

ssau

ltA

VO

VIS

ITO

R/GU

EST-

WIT

HO

UT

WEA

PON

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

ssau

ltA

VW

VIS

ITO

R/GU

EST

- WEA

PON

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DEA

OFN

-NA

TURA

L0

65

03

23

174

31

01

710

6D

eath

DEC

DEA

TH-O

FN-E

XEC-

ELEC

CH

R0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

EHO

FN-H

OM

ICID

E0

10

00

00

00

00

01

02

Dea

thD

EIO

FN-E

XEC-

LETH

INJ

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DES

OFN

-SU

ICID

E0

11

01

00

00

00

00

14

Dea

thD

OA

OFN

-ACC

IDEN

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

EGST

AFF

-HO

MIC

IDE

(ON

DU

TY)

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DEF

STA

FF-S

UIC

IDE

(ON

DU

TY)

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DED

STA

FF-A

CCID

ENT

(ON

DU

TY)

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DET

STA

FF (O

N D

UTY

)-NA

TURA

L0

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

Dea

thD

EVV

ISIT

OR

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DV

HV

ISIT

OR-

HO

MIC

IDE

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DV

SV

ISIT

OR-

SUIC

IDE

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DV

AV

ISIT

OR-

ACC

IDEN

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

VN

VIS

ITO

R-N

ATU

RAL

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

istu

rban

ceD

ILTE

MP.

CO

NTR

OL

LOSS

00

00

01

00

00

00

00

1D

istu

rban

ceD

IRTH

REA

T CO

NTR

OL

LOSS

10

10

00

00

00

00

00

2D

istu

rban

ceD

ISM

INO

R30

515

817

311

6616

961

111

211

333

7615

413

42


TDO

C IN

CID

ENT

SUM

MA

RY:

FY

2015

- 20

16

Plea

se n

ote

that

inci

dent

s rep

orte

d m

ay in

clud

e m

ore

than

one

par

ticip

ant w

hile

oth

er in

cide

nts a

re b

y de

finiti

on a

bout

a si

ngle

par

ticip

ant (

ex: d

eath

or s

uici

de).

SOU

RC

E: T

his r

epor

t sum

mar

izes

dat

a en

tere

d by

Fac

ility

Ope

ratio

ns’ p

erso

nnel

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith T

DO

C p

olic

y 10

3.02

.

BC

CX

HC

CF

MC

CX

MLR

CN

ECX

NW

CX

RM

SISC

CF

SPN

DTC

IXTP

FWTT

CC

WC

FAW

TSP

SYST

EMBl

edso

e C

ount

y C

orre

ctio

nal

Com

plex

Har

dem

an

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Mor

gan

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Mar

k H

. Lu

ttrel

l C

ente

r

Nor

thea

st

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Nor

thw

est

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Riv

erbe

nd

Max

imum

Se

curit

y In

stitu

tion

Sout

h C

entra

l C

orre

ctio

nal

Faci

lity

DeB

erry

Sp

ecia

l N

eeds

Fa

cilit

y

Turn

ey

Cen

ter

Indu

stria

l C

ompl

ex

TN P

rison

fo

r Wom

en

Trou

sdal

e Tu

rner

C

orre

ctio

nal

Cen

ter

Whi

tevi

lle

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Wes

t TN

St

ate

Peni

tent

iary

Ave

rage

Pop

ulat

ion

2361

1977

2101

414

1784

2313

770

1648

759

1542

785

585

1507

1554

2010

0D

rugs

DFI

INSI

DE

SECU

RE P

ERIM

ETER

-NO

PO

SS1

1110

01

02

30

00

00

028

Dru

gsD

FOO

UTS

IDE

SECU

RE P

ERIM

ETER

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

rugs

DRJ

CON

FIS-

SIGN

IF A

MT-

OFN

113

70

220

21

27

00

314

72D

rugs

DRK

CON

FIS-

SIGN

IF A

MT-

STA

FF0

00

00

00

10

00

00

01

Dru

gsD

RLCO

NFI

S-SI

GNIF

AM

T-V

ISIT

OR

01

00

00

00

00

00

00

1D

rugs

DRQ

CON

FISC

ATI

ON

-OFF

END

ER76

4982

333

4519

178

5020

026

2745

5D

rugs

DRN

CON

FISC

ATI

ON

-STA

FF0

00

00

00

10

00

00

01

Dru

gsD

ROCO

NFI

SCA

TIO

N-V

ISIT

OR

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

rugs

DRP

PARA

PHER

NA

LIA

868

351

4618

431

455

113

416

322

Dru

gsD

RSPO

SSES

SIO

N /

SELL

ING

/ USE

6152

108

852

8229

299

8231

4726

3064

6D

rugs

IOP

INTO

XICA

NTS

FO

UN

D O

N P

ROPE

RTY

00

00

00

00

00

01

00

1Eq

uip

Prob

EPA

MA

JOR

DIS

RUPT

ION

00

00

00

00

00

10

00

1Es

cape

ACA

ABS

CON

D C

UST

OD

Y-A

TTEM

PT0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peA

CMA

BSCO

ND

CU

STO

DY

-MIN

SEC

URI

TY0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peES

ASE

CURE

SU

PERV

ISIO

N0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peES

BM

IN S

ECU

RITY

-VIO

LEN

CE0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peES

CM

IN S

ECU

RITY

UN

IT0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peES

PM

IN S

EC W

ORK

CRE

W-S

UPV

00

00

01

00

00

00

00

1Es

cape

ESU

MIN

SEC

WO

RK C

REW

UN

SUPV

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Es

cape

ESE

FURL

OU

GH/P

ASS

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Es

cape

ESF

ATT

. SEC

URE

SU

PV0

00

00

00

00

00

00

11

Esca

peES

HA

TT.M

IN S

ECU

RITY

-VIO

LEN

CE0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peES

IA

TT. M

IN S

ECU

RITY

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Es

cape

ESR

RETU

RN F

ROM

ESC

APE

PRI

OR

TO T

OM

IS0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Fire

FII

SER-

INJ-

PRO

P D

MG>

$500

-OPR

DIS

RUP

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Fi

reFI

PIN

J-PR

OP

DM

G>$5

00-O

PR D

ISRU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Fire

FIS

PRO

P D

MG>

$500

-OPE

R D

ISRU

P0

00

00

20

00

00

00

02

Inju

ryIH

AA

CCID

ENT-

OFN

-SER

IOU

S0

10

10

01

00

00

00

14

Inju

ryIH

CA

CCID

ENT-

OFN

WRK

REL

ATE

D12

036

40

041

15

751

00

017

5In

jury

IHB

ACC

IDEN

T-O

FN

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0In

jury

IJA

ACC

IDEN

T-ST

AFF

-SER

IOU

S0

00

10

00

00

10

00

02

Inju

ryIJ

BA

CCID

ENT-

STA

FF32

335

2037

339

176

270

016

524

0In

jury

ILA

ACC

IDEN

T-V

ISIT

OR-

SERI

OU

S0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Inju

ryIL

BA

CCID

ENT-

VIS

ITO

R9

02

30

12

00

13

00

122

Inju

ryIN

BSE

LF IN

FLIC

TED

-SER

IOU

S0

10

00

00

02

10

00

15

Inju

ryIN

CSE

LF IN

FLIC

TED

3620

814

13

107

163

152

2318

176

Illne

ssIO

TO

FN-S

ERIO

US-

HO

SP18

466

524

446

130

571

122

5533

4Ill

ness

ISH

STA

FF-S

ERIO

US-

HO

SP(O

N D

UTY

)5

06

51

92

06

15

11

547

Illne

ssIV

SV

ISIT

OR-

SERI

OU

S-H

OSP

10

00

00

00

00

00

01

2Ill

ness

IVM

VIS

ITO

R0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Othe

rCI

PCE

LL IN

SID

E PE

RIM

ETER

-NO

PO

SS0

015

01

21

00

10

00

020

Othe

rBT

HBO

MB

THRE

AT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Ot

her

CON

CON

TRA

BAN

D27

928

514

227

9023

817

716

082

180

118

118

177

186

2259

Othe

rPC

TPO

SS/U

SE C

ELLU

LAR

TEL.

3413

937

10

197

364

150

9320

790

5044

304

1845

Demographics 61

TDO

C IN

CID

ENT

SUM

MA

RY:

FY

2015

– 2

016

BC

CXH

CCF

MCC

XM

LRC

NECX

NWCX

RMSI

SCCF

SPND

TCIX

TPFW

TTCC

WCF

AW

TSP

SYST

EMBl

edso

e Co

unty

Co

rrect

iona

l Co

mpl

ex

Hard

eman

Co

unty

Co

rrect

iona

l Fa

cility

Mor

gan

Coun

ty

Corre

ctio

nal

Com

plex

Mar

k H.

Lu

ttrel

l Ce

nter

North

east

Co

rrect

iona

l Co

mpl

ex

North

west

Co

rrect

iona

l Co

mpl

ex

Rive

rben

d M

axim

um

Secu

rity

Inst

itutio

n

Sout

h Ce

ntra

l Co

rrect

iona

l Fa

cility

DeBe

rry

Spec

ial

Need

s Fa

cility

Turn

ey

Cent

er

Indu

stria

l Co

mpl

ex

TN P

rison

fo

r Wom

en

Trou

sdal

e Tu

rner

Co

rrect

iona

l Ce

nter

Whi

tevil

le

Corre

ctio

nal

Facil

ity

Wes

t TN

Stat

e Pe

nite

ntia

ry

Aver

age

Popu

latio

n23

6119

7721

0141

417

8423

1377

016

4875

915

4278

558

515

0715

5420

100

Inc T

ype

Incid

ent D

escr

iption

Othe

rPT

OPO

SS/U

SE T

OBAC

CO P

ROD.

114

102

466

4213

276

2840

8586

1339

7988

8Ot

her

PDA

PROP

DM

G>$5

009

09

00

122

116

23

00

458

Othe

rSX

MSE

XUAL

MIS

COND

UCT

937

143

1013

780

119

211

2342

1841

1133

012

65Ot

her

RAP

RAPE

01

00

00

00

00

00

00

1Ot

her

RIO

RIOT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Ot

her

SBT

SABO

TAGE

- OP

R DI

SRUP

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Ot

her

HOS

HOST

AGE

SITU

ATIO

N0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Othe

rEH

TEP

IDEM

IC P

UBLI

C HE

ALTH

THR

EAT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Ot

her

PGA

PART

IN S

TG A

CTIV

ITY

3244

220

1222

331

524

08

2121

245

Othe

rPG

MPO

SSES

S ST

G M

ATER

IAL

9049

107

05

3516

287

330

4225

2045

7Ot

her

ILP

INST

LOC

KDOW

N-PA

RTIA

L1

270

01

41

340

40

012

084

Othe

rIL

TIN

ST L

OCKD

OWN-

TOTA

L0

60

00

12

80

10

06

327

Strik

eSK

IIN

MAT

E-OP

ER.D

ISRU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Strik

eSK

SST

AFF-

OPER

DIS

RUP

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Su

icide

SUA

ATT-

SERI

OUS

INJU

RY2

00

00

00

00

00

00

02

Suici

deSU

CAT

TEM

PT20

62

01

00

29

43

36

258

Use o

f For

ceUF

CCH

EMIC

AL A

GENT

S9

794

013

92

539

90

3270

4633

5Us

e of F

orce

UFD

DEAD

LY W

EAPO

N0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Use o

f For

ceUF

EEL

EC R

ESTR

AINT

S12

014

06

133

06

45

00

669

Use o

f For

ceUF

LLE

SS T

HAN

LETH

AL0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Use o

f For

ceUF

MM

EDIC

AL8

026

00

13

020

18

00

168

Use o

f For

ceUF

PPH

YSIC

AL29

4842

212

2629

3718

1624

2128

3036

2W

eapo

nW

ABAM

MUN

ITIO

N0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Wea

pon

WAM

AMM

UNIT

ION-

SIGN

IF A

MT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0W

eapo

nW

CFCO

MM

ERCI

AL F

IREA

RM0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Wea

pon

WCK

COM

MER

CIAL

KNI

FE0

10

00

20

00

10

01

16

Wea

pon

WEB

EXPL

OSIV

E0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Wea

pon

WEX

EXPL

OSIV

E-SI

GNIF

AM

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Wea

pon

WHF

NON

COM

MER

CIAL

FIR

EARM

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0W

eapo

nW

HKNO

N CO

MM

ERCI

AL K

NIFE

2512

367

012

639

926

261

077

031

9125

914

85W

eapo

nW

OTOT

HER

64

141

217

74

06

122

215

101

Wea

pon

WPC

CLUB

00

10

02

00

00

00

00

3W

eapo

nW

RMRA

W M

ATER

IALS

141

270

2215

121

34

022

135

157

Wea

pon

WTA

CLAS

S A

TOOL

00

10

01

10

00

00

01

4W

eapo

nW

TBCL

ASS

B TO

OL0

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

Sum

mar

y BC

CXH

CCF

MCC

XM

LRC

NECX

NWCX

RMSI

SCCF

SPND

TCIX

TPFW

TTCC

WCF

AW

TSP

Tota

lTO

TAL

1,498

1,335

1,693

138

987

1,866

894

1,291

467

936

501

507

830

1,774

14,71

7

Rate

per 1

00 -

Tota

l63

.4467

.5380

.5933

.3455

.3280

.6711

6.08

78.35

61.52

60.69

63.86

86.69

55.07

114.1

673

.22

In Ja

nuar

y 201

6, A

CA, A

CM, A

SW, A

SO, A

OW, A

OO, A

VW, &

AVO

code

s wer

e add

ed.

In Ja

nuar

y 201

6, A

SA, A

SB, A

SC, A

SJ, A

SD, A

SE, A

SF, A

SK, A

SG, A

SH, A

SI, A

SM, E

SE, E

SP, &

ESU

code

s wer

e dea

ctiva

ted.

In Ja

nuar

y 201

6, D

RJ an

d DRQ

wer

e inc

orpo

rated

into

DRS

In Ja

nuar

y 201

6, D

RS w

as ch

ange

d fro

m Dr

ug S

elling

to D

rug P

osse

ssion

/ Se

lling /

Use

An er

ror w

as de

tected

in pr

eviou

s rep

orts

and c

orre

cted w

ithin

the O

ctobe

r 201

5 rep

ort.

Des

cript

ions o

f IHB

& IH

C we

re re

verse

d.Pl

ease

note

that in

ciden

ts re

porte

d may

inclu

de m

ore t

han o

ne pa

rticip

ant w

hile o

ther i

ncide

nts ar

e by d

efini

tion a

bout

a sing

le pa

rticip

ant (

ex: d

eath

or su

icide

).In

ciden

t rate

s (pe

r 100

inma

tes) a

re ca

lculat

ed on

the b

asis

of th

e ave

rage

inma

ate po

pulat

ion by

facil

ity an

d sys

tem w

ide.

SOUR

CE: T

his re

port

summ

arize

s data

enter

ed by

Fac

ility O

pera

tions

’ per

sonn

el in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith T

DOC

polic

y 103

.02.


Demographics of Parolees by District

June 30, 2016

District 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age

10 36 39 65 104 100 119 119 143 78 11 1 0 43.120 45 57 97 118 143 136 201 219 148 38 0 0 41.621 27 19 33 55 47 50 89 82 53 15 0 0 42.230 66 60 99 116 136 132 182 138 89 15 0 0 44.431 29 23 31 55 65 62 78 75 68 17 0 0 42.240 0 4 7 9 11 14 24 21 10 2 1 0 39.741 38 33 49 90 72 56 78 64 25 2 0 0 46.642 66 90 153 170 198 236 340 311 215 61 1 1 41.650 33 22 54 83 86 128 166 148 80 22 2 0 41.251 28 24 49 49 52 76 88 94 59 10 0 0 42.560 23 27 34 68 73 86 115 92 85 26 0 0 41.161 32 28 57 73 101 115 150 145 81 23 0 0 41.670 7 15 24 42 60 46 38 38 26 2 0 0 43.971 19 29 50 71 98 106 132 115 99 26 0 0 40.972 39 46 76 118 121 163 215 154 147 60 0 0 41.180 24 14 33 43 38 47 65 74 55 5 0 0 42.481 25 13 31 51 63 72 93 112 82 28 0 0 40.1

OIC 12 8 21 33 44 45 41 41 20 1 0 0 43.8Unassigned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SYSTEM 549 551 963 1348 1508 1689 2214 2066 1420 364 5 1 42.1

AGE

District Asian Black HispanicNative


10 2 109 28 1 675 674 14120 1 269 22 2 908 1003 19921 0 42 3 1 424 408 6230 0 265 4 1 763 896 13731 1 40 9 2 451 395 10840 2 34 3 0 64 31 7241 5 228 33 1 240 473 3442 8 1114 129 2 589 1663 17950 10 237 32 2 543 708 11651 1 155 8 2 363 456 7360 2 383 5 0 239 558 7161 2 276 5 0 522 704 10170 0 245 9 0 44 296 271 7 525 60 1 152 679 6672 3 995 16 0 125 1042 9780 0 127 10 2 259 360 3881 5 181 15 0 369 503 67

OIC 2 107 16 1 140 232 34Unassigned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SYSTEM 51 5332 407 18 6870 11081 1597

RACE SEX

Demographics 63

Demographics of Probationers

by District June 30, 2016

District 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age

10 98 129 229 378 455 640 720 753 802 399 20 1 38.420 113 128 256 391 515 636 854 999 968 646 47 0 37.221 53 64 114 195 299 328 430 572 539 306 20 2 37.030 97 116 295 454 589 781 1020 1019 1223 799 60 1 36.731 68 66 110 185 203 272 327 384 379 248 12 0 38.240 31 76 117 182 270 331 469 553 601 419 36 0 35.841 42 65 119 162 175 211 261 318 339 233 10 0 38.042 25 32 84 129 128 189 264 335 370 240 19 0 35.950 55 66 123 242 289 371 536 616 644 561 53 0 35.751 74 67 124 185 236 304 373 425 442 376 33 0 37.260 42 45 90 143 187 229 360 371 377 306 18 0 36.561 36 50 111 178 209 262 398 411 374 319 38 0 36.870 8 4 17 20 23 17 27 27 32 9 1 0 40.771 30 57 79 145 244 268 404 542 671 654 47 0 33.772 45 76 173 220 272 427 595 690 889 845 66 0 34.380 25 33 106 152 192 244 338 463 456 376 17 0 35.581 33 54 114 170 207 229 336 453 468 347 18 2 36.1

OIC 184 287 560 818 899 908 1070 909 604 166 2 0 42.8Unassigned 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57.0

SYSTEM 1059 1415 2822 4349 5392 6647 8782 9840 10178 7249 517 6 37.1

AGE

District Asian Black HispanicNative


10 12 387 70 7 4148 3095 152920 16 903 67 15 4552 3986 156721 4 166 27 5 2720 2087 83530 13 1510 86 4 4841 4706 174831 3 102 40 3 2106 1534 72040 23 1750 117 2 1193 2314 77141 20 1087 58 0 770 1473 46242 19 1082 69 1 644 1430 38550 51 823 141 5 2536 2629 92751 11 496 56 2 2074 1866 77360 4 1096 26 2 1040 1688 48061 3 715 24 4 1640 1727 65970 1 135 5 0 44 172 1371 19 2296 58 1 767 2329 81272 10 3716 54 1 517 3253 104580 29 625 51 1 1696 1807 59581 9 510 65 1 1846 1696 735

OIC 35 1969 561 20 3822 5072 1335Unassigned 0 0 0 0 1 1 0

SYSTEM 282 19368 1575 74 36957 42865 15391

RACE SEX


Community Supervision Offender Levels of Supervision June 30, 2016

Face

-to-F

ace

(offi

ce)

Face

-to-F

ace

(fiel

d)Co

llate

ral

Cont

act

Sex O

ffend

er

Trea

tmen

t

Hom

e Vi

sit

Empl

oym

ent

Fees

Spec

ial

Cond

ition

sSe

x Offe

nder

Re

gist

ry

Arre

st C

heck

Resid

ence

Se

arch

Drug

Scre

en

Polyg

raph

Risk

As

sess

men

t

PSU Primary 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/3 1 1/3 1/3 1/6 1/6

PSU Secondary 1 1 1 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/6 1/6 1/6 1/6

PSU Intermediate 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/9 1/12 1/6 1/12

PSU Transitional 1 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/12 1/12 1/6 1/121/2PSU

Supe

rvisi

on

Stan

dard

s

Monthly Interactions

Program Supervision Unit

Each whole number is the required contact each month. Each fraction is the number of contacts / number of months. Example: 1/3 is one contact every three months

3

2

1

Parole ProbationSpecial Restricted 19 625

Restricted 359 2587Elevated 984 1555Standard 6580 29324

Administrative 3131 22564PSU 1587 1536

Unassigned 18 65Totals 12678 58256

Data Source: Tennessee Offender Management System

Level of Supervision

Supervision Level Supervision Type Minimum Monthly Required Interactions

ENHANCED 1 Face to Face in Field

SANCTIONED 3 Face to Face in Office or Field

2 Collateral Contacts

Total: 6 Contacts

INTAKE 1 Face to Face in Field

POST VIOLATION 2 Face to Face in Office

or Field

DRC PHASE 2 1 Collateral Contact

PSU PHASE ONE Total: 4 Contacts

MAXIMUM 1 Face to Face in Field

RESISTIVE 1 Face to Face in Office or Field

DRC PHASE 3 1 Collateral Contact

PSU PHASE TWO Total: 3 Contacts

MEDIUM 1 Face to Face in the Field or Office

MINIMUM or

TELEPHONE REPORTING 1 Collateral Contact

PSU PHASE THREE Total: 1 Contact

Administrative

Absconder, Deported, Detainer, In Custody on TDOC sentence, Inter-State Compact outgoing, Judicial Suspension of Supervision,

Residential Treatment Placement, Suspension of Direct Supervision, Warrant

Status (Interactions as Needed)

Standard

Special Restricted

Restricted

Elevated

DRC PHASE 1

Demographics 65


Demographics 67

STATISTICAL ABSTRACT USER’S GUIDE

Population, Capacity, & Trends

TDOC Backup: Felons sentenced to TDOC custody and held in local jails while awaiting transfer to a TDOC institution. Local or Locally Sentenced: Convicted felons sentenced to serve their time in a local jail. As felony offenders, these persons are under TDOC jurisdiction. Other Convicted Felons: Convicted felons awaiting sentencing or not yet ready for transfer to TDOC because of other pending charges. Includes technical violators awaiting probable cause/revocation/rescission hearing or adjudication of pending charges. Convicted Misdemeanants: Inmates serving time because of a misdemeanor conviction. Pre-Trial Felony Detainees: Inmates charged with a felony but not yet convicted. Pre-Trial Misdemeanant Detainees: Inmates charged with a misdemeanor but not yet convicted. Others: Inmates held in local facilities for federal crimes, city ordinances, etc. Community Corrections: A grant program created in 1985 as an alternative to incarceration. Programs are developed based on the individual needs of the area served. Probation: Felons subject to conditions imposed by the court and subject to community supervision without incarceration. Parole: Felons originally sentenced to an incarceration period and released to serve the remainder of their sentence under community supervision.

Offender Accountability, Programs & Services

Level of Care: An inmate’s need for mental health services based on their ability to function in general population. Level I: No mental health services are indicated for the inmate. Adjustment and function in the general population is not impaired by mental illness.


Level II: Mental health outpatient services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is mildly impaired due to mental illness and/or mental retardation or is not currently impaired but he/she needs monitoring. Level III: Supported living unit services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is moderately impaired due to a serious mental illness. This designation reflects a tenuous mental status that is easily overwhelmed by everyday pressures, demands, and frustrations. Level IV: Supported living unit services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is severely impaired due to serious and persistent mental illness. This level reflects active symptoms of a major mental illness and impaired reality testing.

Demographics

Class A Incidents: Events which involve life threatening matters and breaches of security that are likely to cause serious operational problems, imminent threat to the control and order of a facility and/or to the community Selected other incidents: Less serious events where injury to staff, visitors and/or inmates may or may not have occurred that cause the disruption of the normal facility operation, or which pose a possible risk to the health or safety of the general public that did not require the involvement of outside agencies in institutional functions, as well as events that pose no threat to the local community, or to the safe and secure operation of the institution. Please note that most incidents reported in the monthly summary may include more than one participant or infraction while other incidents are by definition about a single participant (ex: death or suicide).

Demographics 69

www.tn.gov/correction

RACHEL JACKSON BUILDING 320 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH

NASHVILLE, TN 37243 615-253-8187

http://www.tn.gov/correction

Date post:	04-Jun-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times

STATISTICAL ABSTRACT FISCAL YEAR 2016 - Tennessee · 2017-09-21 · STATISTICAL ABSTRACT FISCAL...

Documents