}  STATUS OF CCS

}  POTENTIAL GEOLOGICAL STORAGE

}  FUTURE PLANS

Ø  BioFuels Act for use of alternative fuels Ø  Use of CNG and LPG for sustainable transport Ø  Natural Gas Infrastructure Development Program Ø  Use of green fuels in the National Renewable

Energy Program Ø  The Philippine Energy Efficiency Project Ø  Intended Nationally Determined Contributions

(INDC) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) for COP21: Paris Climate Conference

Ø  Submitted to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) last October 2015

Ø  Aims to reduce carbon emissions of the country by 70% by 2030

Ø  CO2 Emission Reduction will come from the following sectors: •  Energy •  Transport •  Waste •  Forestry •  Industry

Targeted RE-based Installed Capacity

Electricity Generation 39.9% Transport 35.6% Industry 17.0% Commercial, Agricultural and Residential 7.5%

Why no carbon capture projects in industrial processes or in operating power generation facilities in the Philippines? Due to the many challenges such as:

Ø  Technical Ø  Cost-competitiveness Ø  Environmental and public health risks Ø  Absence of policies mandating reductions in

carbon emissions or specific laws for the purpose.

CALABARZON (Cavite, Laguna, Batangas, Rizal, Quezon) Ø  comprises a disproportionally large share of the

total energy-based GHG emissions of the country Other sources:

Ø  Industrial zones Ø  Coal-fired power plants Ø  Gas-fired power plant Ø  Cement plants Ø  Oil refinery

Identified potential CO2 storage facilities: Ø  Sedimentary basins (conventional storage) – oil

and gas fields •  Effective capacity of the country: 0.3 Gt *

Ø  Saline aquifers •  Theoretical capacity of the country: 22.7 Gt *

Ø  Unconventional storage sites such as geothermal field, ophiolites, coal beds and shales. *

*Asian Development Bank (2013). CO2 Storage Estimate. Prospects for Carbon Capture and Storage in Southeast Asia, p. 26, 39-40. Mandaluyong City, Philippines.

Ø  Presence of proven petroleum system •  Characterization of reservoir quality •  Characterization of seal efficiency

o  From acquired technical data of Discovery Wells, and/or Wells with Oil and Gas Shows

Ø  Proximity from Power Plants •  Electricity Generation accounts for 39.9% of

CO2 Emissions of the Philippines

1.  Cagayan Basin 2.  Central Luzon Basin 3.  Northwest Palawan Basin 4.  Reed Bank 5.  Southwest Palawan 6.  Visayan Basin 7.  Cotabato Basin 8.  Sulu Sea Basin

BASIN CRITERION

NW PALAWAN

BASIN

SULU SEA

BASIN

REED BANK BASIN

VISAYAN BASIN

SW PALAWAN

BASIN CAGAYAN

BASIN CENTRAL LUZON BASIN

COTABATO BASIN

Tectonics (Seismicity)

5 (Low)

5 (Low)

5 (Low)

1 (High)

5 (Low)

2 (High/ Medium)

4 (Medium/

Low) 1

(High)

Size 3 (Large)

4 (Very Large)

4 (Very Large)

3 (Large)

3 (Large)

2 (Medium)

2 (Medium)

2 (Moderate)

Onshore/ Offshore

1 (Deep Offshore)

1 (Deep Offshore)

2 (Shallow Offshore)

3 (Onshore)

1 (Deep Offshore)

3 (Onshore)

3 (Onshore)

3 (Onshore)

Depth

Type 3 (Marine)

3 (Marine)

3 (Marine)

2 (Marine – Terrestrial)

3 (Marine)

2 (Marine –Terrestrial)

2 (Marine – Terrestrial)

2 (Marine – Terrestrial)

Faulting Intensity*^

3 (Limited)

3 (Limited)

3 (Limited)

2 (Moderate)

3 (Limited)

3 (Limited)

3 (Limited)

3 (Limited)

Hydrogeology*

Geothermal*^ 3 (Cold)

3 (Cold)

3 (Cold)

1 (Warm)

3 (Cold)

2 (Moderate)

1 (Warm)

1 (Warm)

PHILIPPINE SEDIMENTARY BASIN CANDIDATES FOR CCS-M CO2 STORAGE

BASIN CRITERION

NW PALAWAN BASIN

SULU SEA BASIN

REED BANK BASIN

VISAYAN BASIN

SW PALAWAN BASIN

CAGAYAN BASIN

CENTRAL LUZON BASIN

COTABATO BASIN

Hydrocarbon potential

3 (Medium)

3 (Medium)

2 (Small)

2 (Small)

2 (Small)

2 (Small)

2 (Small)

2 (Small)

Maturity 3 (Development)

2 (Exploration)

2 (Exploration)

2 (Exploration)

2 (Exploration)

2 (Exploration)

2 (Exploration)

2 (Exploration)

Coal and CBM*

Reservoir 5 (Excellent)

4 (Good)

4 (Good)

4 (Good)

2 (Potential)

4 (Good)

2 (Potential)

2 (Potential)

Seal 5 (Excellent)

4 (Good)

4 (Good)

3 (Poor)

2 (Potential)

4 (Good)

2 (Potential)

2 (Potential)

Reservoir/ Seal Pairs

3 (Good/ Single)

4^ (Excellent/ Multiple)

4 (Excellent/ Multiple)

4 (Excellent/ Multiple)

2 (Poor)

3 (Good/ Single)

2 (Poor)

2 (Poor)

Infrastructure*

CO* Data

Availability 4 Excellent 3 Good 2 Moderate 2 Moderate 2 Moderate 2 Moderate 1 Poor 2 Moderate

Total^ 41 39 38 31 30 29 26 24

PHILIPPINE SEDIMENTARY BASIN CANDIDATES FOR CCS-M CO2 STORAGE

In the absence of other viable storage options in the near- and long- term, it is logical and practical to use the existing 504-km natural gas pipel ine for transporting CO2 from the CALABARZON Gas Fields to Malampaya Ø  Proposed gas fields will not be available for

CO2 storage before 2024 Ø  Compatibility of current pipeline for CO2

transport?

Malampaya gas field can

accommodate an annual CO2 emission of 11 Mt/year

Specific provisions of law are needed to address, among others, ownership and long term steward of injected CO2 on public land; containment structures, and monitoring, measurement and verification requirements.

POLICY

Ø  There are limited opportunities for large-scale deployment of CCS in the Philippines before 2024.

Ø  To focus the pilot on the technical details of reversing the circulation from the Malampaya OGP in Batangas to the Malampaya carbon storage site.

Ø  To better evaluate and delineate the identified sedimentary basin candidates as possible CO2 storage locations in the future

Ø  Actively attend workshops related to CCS to be updated with the developments, technology transfer and future deployment of CCS in the country.

FUTURE PLANS

Government needs to demonstrate its commitment to pursuing CCS through publ i c s ta tements , funding of CCS activities at a low but effective level, institution of a basic “capture ready” policy and initiation of public engagement on CCS.

FUTURE PLANS

Thank You!