Date post: | 15-Feb-2017 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | patrick-niemann |
View: | 189 times |
Download: | 0 times |
This project has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613194
EU-InnovatE: Sustainable Lifestyles & Green Economy in Europe to 2050
WEBINAR ‘STATUS QUO ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE LIVE-STYLES IN EUROPE’ by Andre Habisch, John Togersen & Rene Schmidpeter
[Tuesday, September 20th 2016]
2
Agenda
15:00 Webinar opens
15:05 Introduction & contextSimon Pickard, Director General, ABIS
15:10 Presentation of emerging evidence & findingsAndre Habisch – John Thøgersen – René
SchmidpeterKatholische Universität Eichstätt-IngolstadtAarhus University, DenmarkCologne Business School (CBS)
15:35 Questions and comments
15:55 Summary & forthcoming events
16:00 Webinar closes
3
Sustainable Lifestyles at EU Level
Strategic policy objectives:
1. Promoting smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in the single market
2. Managing an ageing population while reducing current levels of energy, transport and resource use
3. Rethinking consumption / production systems as part of a transition to low-carbon economy by 2050
Ref: SPREAD 2050 (www.sustainable-lifestyles.eu)
4
EU Policy Research Questions
i. Links between economic, ecological, human and technological systems and their influence on consumers' values and behaviour
ii. Short and long-term obstacles and opportunities associated with the transition to European sustainable lifestyles and green economy
iii. New ways and new business models to manage natural resources while reducing consumption and improving quality of life
iv. Prospects for sustainable lifestyles and the green economy (i.e. trends up to 2050)
6
Key Idea
„ ... investigatethe creative, innovative and entrepreneurial roles of usersin developing novel sustainable products, services and systems (Sustainable Lifestyles 2.0).“
7
WP 7 Synthesis
SL 2.0
WP 8 Dissemination
WP 9 Management
WP 6 Policy Design for SL 2.0
WP 5 Measuring Trends SL 2.0
WP 3Company
SustainabilityInnovation
Integrating Users
WP 4User
SustainabilityInnovation and
Entrepreneurship
WP 2 Future of SL 2.0
WP 1 Past and Present of SL 2.0
This project has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613194
The History of Sustainable Lifestyles in Europe & Systemic Transitions
PRESENTERS:Andre Habisch – John Thøgersen – René SchmidpeterKatholische Universität Eichstätt-IngolstadtAarhus University, DenmarkCologne Business School (CBS)
9
Introducing the Presenters
André HabischProfessor of Social Ethics
Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt
FOTOHABISCH
10
Introducing the Presenters
John ThøgersenProfessor of Economic Psychology
Aarhus University, Denmark
11
Introducing the Presenters
René SchmidpeterProfessor of International Business Ethics and CSR
Cologne Business School, GERMANY
12
Core Activities
1. A European survey concerning sustainable lifestyles and user sustainability innovation frameworks
2. Understanding the diverse cultural systems in Europe
13
1. A European survey concerning sustainable lifestyles
John ThøgersenProfessor of Economic Psychology
Aarhus University, Denmark
14
• Questionnaire based on scientific literature on domain-related lifestyles, sustainable consumer behaviour and innovation research
• Representative samples of approx. 1000 people from each of 10 European countries, drawn from panels managed by professional market research companies
• Randomly assigned to answer questions related to lifestyle in one of the three domains: Food, housing, and transportation (i.e. ≈335 answered questions about each in each country)
EU-innovate survey in 10 European countries on lifestyles and sustainability
15
THE 10 COUNTRIES
Central– Germany, Netherlands
North– Denmark, Finland
South– Italy, Spain
East– Poland, Hungary
West– France, UK
16
• All outcome variables vary significantly across FRL segments• The direct effect of country class is highly significant for meatless suppers and marginally
significant for buying organic food• FRL accounts for a substantially larger variation than country class in all outcome variables except meatless
suppers • Consumers’ openness to new, environmentally-friendly food products is more strongly related to their food-
related lifestyle than is the sustainability of their everyday food choices• There is a significant interaction between country class and FRL with regard to all outcome
variables• Most of these effects are marginal, except that segment 5 has meatless suppers most frequently in country
classes 1 & 2, but least frequently in country class 3.• FRL segment 3, the “enthusiastic food consumers”, seems to be not only most engaged in food
and food provision, but also the most sustainability oriented food consumers.
GLM analysis of the joint effect of country and FRL
17
• It is possible to empirically identify distinct cross-country segments of consumers with different food related lifestyles in Europe
• The segments are linked to geographical and/or national context and differ in their presence in three broad regions of Europe (North, Central, South & East)
• Food-related lifestyles and national context both seem to contribute to (un)sustainable food-related consumption
• The impact of FRL on sustainable food consumption depends on country of residence, especially with regard to meat consumption
• Especially consumers’ openness to new, environmentally-friendly food products is strongly related to their food-related lifestyle
• Similar results have been obtained with regard to housing related lifestyles and transport related lifestyles
Survey Results
18
2. Understanding the diverse cultural systems in Europe
André HabischProfessor of Social Ethics
Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt
René SchmidpeterProfessor of International Business
Ethics and CSRCologne Business School, GERMANY
19
Workshops
• Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt based campus (covering Central Western European countries) in April 2015
• Catholic University Milan (covering Southern European countries) in October 2015
• Copenhagen Business School (covering Northern European Countries) in February 2016
• Forum For The Future, London (covering Western Europe) in February 2016
• Leon Koczminski Business School, Warsaw (covering Central Eastern Europe) in March 2016.
20
Results I: Region Characteristics Workshop
Main FocusParticipants
Sustainability
Understanding
Characteristic
of Discussioms
Strength
Weakness
MUNICH business driven
entrepreneurial,
value-added
future oriented SME integration
academic reflection on
SMELONDON civil society
driven
innovative, disruptiv
progressiv innovation driven
financial industry
WARSAW academia / expert driven
local and regional oriented,
pragmatic connected to societal needs
weak institutional
systemsMILANO academia /
student driven
regional and small group
oriented
defensive, non-political
community oriented
political system
COPENHAGEN expert driven
societal engenieering
comprehensive, political
highly reflected and integrated in
politics
intellectual based
sustainability discussion
22
Conclusions: Diversity as Strength of Europe
• WP 1 activities showed that regional differences among European countries are enormous: different topics, culturally coded expectations, dominant industries, political issues and social capital constellations.
• most sustainability innovations are context dependent and emerge from local knowledge and analysis. As a result, persons in different European countries are facing country (or even region) specific transaction costs of engaging for sustainable lifestyles.
• Persons choose the adequate way of turning their sustainability preferences into action.
• For promoting innovation towards more sustainable life-styles, it is important to establish and foster sector-specific ‘hotspots’.
• With a greater variability of (alternative) forms of engagement, citizens face an enhanced opportunity structure for sustainable lifestyles (compare recent post in EU-InnovatE blog for examples and details.)
23
• Thøgersen, J. 2017. Sustainable food consumption in the nexus between national context and private lifestyle: A multi-level study. Food Quality and Preference, 55, 16-25.
• SCHOT, J., KANGER, L. & VERBONG, G. 2016. The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems’. Nature Energy.
• HABISCH, A., SCHMIDPETER, R. 2017, Sustainability and Innovation: Cross-European Perspectives, Springer International Publisher.
Key Resources & Publications
This project has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613194
Questions & Feedback from Participants
25
Summary & Forthcoming Events
FINAL CONFERENCE
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 22
HOSTED BY ABIS @ ATELIER DES TANNEURS IN BRUSSELS
EXPLORATION OF PATHWAYS TO ACCELERATE SUSTAINABILITY ENTREPRENEURSHIP
NO CONFERENCE FEES!