New results of the MEG experiment: search
for m+e+g with sensitivity to BR 10-13
A. Baldini INFN Pisa: PANIC
July 28th 2011
Lab. Year Upper limit Experiment or Auth.
PSI 1977 < 1.0 10-9 A. Van der Schaaf et al.
TRIUMF 1977 < 3.6 10-9 P. Depommier et al.
LANL 1979 < 1.7 10-10 W.W. Kinnison et al.
LANL 1986 < 4.9 10-11 Crystal Box
LANL 1999 < 1.2 10-11 MEGA
PSI ~2012 ~ 10-13 MEG
The Standard Model of particle
interactions was explicitily built on the
non observation of this decay (Lepton
Flavour)
Even with the introduction of the recently
discovered neutrino masses SM predicts
the non observability of me g
(BR 10-54)
m e g is an extremely powerfull test for
New Physics models
meg predicted by several models ( mainly (but not only)
SUSY GUTS) @ rates just below the MEGA results
MSSM with
large tanb
Just one recent example
G.Isidori
…
B physics constraints
Signal and background
e+ m+ g
qeg = 180°
Ee = Eg = 52.8 MeV
Te = Tg
signal m e g
background
Physical: RMD
m e g n n
e+ m+ g n
n
Accidental (Dominant)
m e n n
m e g n n
ee g g
eZ eZ g
e+ m+ n
n
g
1/10 of the accidental
one
We have to measure positrons and photons kinematic variables in the most
precise way in order to reduce backgrounds
4(5
) M
easu
red
vari
ab
les
1m
e+
Liq. Xe ScintillationDetector
g
Drift Chamber
Liq. Xe ScintillationDetector
e+
g
Timing Counter
Stopping Target
Thin Superconducting Coil
Muon Beam
Drift Chamber
1. Stopped pE5 beam of 3 107 m /sec in a 150 mm target
2. Solenoidal spectrometer & drift chambers for e+ momentum (DCH)
3. Scintillation counters for e+ timing (TC)
4. Liquid Xenon calorimeter for g detection (LXe) (scintillation)
Detector outline
Part of
One half of the collaborators...
PDF= Probabilty
Distribution Function
Signal
Radiative Bkg
Accidental Bkg
MEG Physics analysis
Blind analysis
9
Michel positrons
Mott scattering device
double turn tracks
PDFs
g variables
+ 4.4 g from
Am/Be source,
9 MeV g from n
capture (n
generator) in Ni
0.3%
Straight line fit
Linearity
g
+ Mott scattering device
e+ variables
2008:
3 months of data taking with low efficient Drift Chambers (DCH) system and
varying xenon light yield as a function of (gaseous) purification
Sensitivity = 1.3 x 10-11, 90%UL = 2.8 x 10-11
Published : NPB 834 (2010) 1
MEG Physics runs
2009 and 2010
DCH system stable (HV distribution system problem corrected) + Xenon
purified and stable. .
2010: twice the statistics of 2009
Sensitivity: average UL obtained by 100 Toy MC experiments generated
with no signal
2009 and 2010 data sets
Slightly worse DC noise
Conditions
Twice the statistics of 2009 data
2009 preliminary results
presented at ICHEP 2010
Recent analysis improvements
Better understanding of the spectrometer • alignement by using cosmic rays tracks and millipede algorithm (CMS)
• relative spectrometer-target aligned by using reconstructed holes in the target
• geometrical correlation between positron momentum and angular error taken
into account
Better evaluation of the relative alignement of spectrometer and
calorimeter
Usage of the background measured in the sidebands in the
likelihood
FC statistical method + profile likelihood for estimating the
confidence intervals
Relative alignement of g
and e+
Spectrometer – target alignement
Update of 2009 data
Events in the signal region: 2009 updated
2009 likelihood analysis
BR =0 probability = 8%
Nsig best value = 3.4
Sensitivity = 3.3 x 10-12
0.17 <9.6x
2010 data
Events in the side bands
Events in the signal region
2010 data unblinded on July 5° 2011
2010
Sensitivity = 2.2 x 10-12
2009 +2010
Summary of analysis results
Sensitivity = 1.6 x 10-12
MEG result
Systematic errors included (2% effect on UL)
Larger contributions from relatice angle offset, correlation in
positron kinematical variables, normalization
1.7 .96 3.2
Profile likelihood curves
not directly used for computing
confidence intervals
Summary
• 8% probability statistical fluctuations happen!
•The combined analysis of 2009 and 2010 data is consistent with a null result
and gives an UL (90% CL) of 2.4 x 10-12 : a constraint 5 times better than the
previous best one to the existence of meg
• Paper on the arXive containing the results shown here:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1107.5547
• 2011 data taking started (noise problem in DC cured)
• MEG will continue to run this and next year to reach a sensitivity of few times x
10-13
Backup slides
BR<1.5 x 10-11 90%CL