Our Challenge for Clean Development and Climate Steel Industry’s Global Sector-based &Technology-based Approach/Challenge 1 Japan’ s 2006fy APP Steel Task Force Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate 1. Japan s 2006fy 2. Overview of Steel’s Sector-based Approach 3 Steel Industry’ s global challenge for Clean Development and Climate 3. Steel Industry s global challenge for Clean Development and Climate A. Uni-lateral: JISF’s Action Plan B. Bi-lateral: Japan-China B. Bi lateral: Japan China C. Seven-lateral: APP Steel Task Force D Si t lt l IISI D. Sixty-lateral: IISI international iron and steel institute 4. IISI’s policy statement on Post Kyoto 5 Summary Wednesday 13 February 2008 Teruo OKAZAKI, PhD Chair for International Environmental Strategic Committee 5. Summary Japan Iron and Steel Federation General Manager, Global Environmental Affairs Department Nippon Steel Corporation The 3 rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008 1
Transcript
Our Challenge for Clean Development and ClimateSteel Industry’s Global Sector-based &Technology-based Approach/Challenge
1 Japan’s 2006fy
APP Steel Task Force Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate
1. Japan s 2006fy
2. Overview of Steel’s Sector-based Approach
3 Steel Industry’s global challenge for Clean Development and Climate3. Steel Industry s global challenge for Clean Development and Climate
A. Uni-lateral: JISF’s Action Plan
B. Bi-lateral: Japan-ChinaB. Bi lateral: Japan China
C. Seven-lateral: APP Steel Task ForceD Si t l t l IISID. Sixty-lateral: IISI international iron and steel institute
4. IISI’s policy statement on Post Kyoto
5 SummaryWednesday 13 February 2008
Teruo OKAZAKI, PhDChair for International Environmental Strategic Committee
5. Summary
Japan Iron and Steel Federation General Manager, Global Environmental Affairs Department
Nippon Steel Corporation
The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 20081
Blast Furnace
0. IntroductionBlast Furnace
Process flow
Coke ovenSintering
Process flow
Coke oven
Basic Oxygen FurnaceFurnace
Continuous Castingg
2The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
Keidanren’s Action PlanPledge and Review (commitment and progress) JAPAN BUSINESS FEDERATION, 2006fy
1.Japan’s 2006fy
○Keidanren’s target is ±0％ or less , 35 industrial sectors participated.○This covers approx. 45% of the national total and 84% of industrial etc.
○I 2006 1 5% d ti d 11 9% i i th ti iti ( 1990)
Industrial sector (2006fy)
CO2emissions[10 thousand t-CO2]
vs1990 （%） 104t-CO2/y
Target (2010 vs 1990) , Actual of 2006
○In 2006, 1.5% reduction under 11.9% increase in the activities (vs. 1990).
(2006fy)
1. Iron and Steel 19,326 -5.1 % -1045 Energy consumption -10% , - 5.2% Production increased by +5.4% (2006)
2. Power (portion) 3, 700 +20.5% +630 Specific CO2 emission －20%, -2% *
3. Chemical 7,288 +9.0% +603 Specific energy consumption -10%, -18%
4. Cement 2,184 - 20.3% - 557 Specific energy consumption -3%, -3%
5. Petroleum 4,062 +31.3% +968 Specific energy consumption -10%, -15%
6 Other sectors6. Other sectors -
7. Non-energy CO2 5,215 - -993
Total(Keidanren) 50,458 －1.5% -745 CO2 ±0% or less, －1.5%Total(Keidanren)(*if nuclear operated properly, -3.5%)
3The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
APP*: Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate STEEL TASK FORCE 4The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
JISF* action planPl d d R i ( it t d )
3-A. Uni-lateral（VAP)
Pledge and Review (commitment and progress)
In 1996, JISF launched ,
① Energy-saving by △10％ (1990→2010)② Utilization of Waste Plastics etc.
(utilization of 1 million-ton). ③ Utili ti f W t E t id③ Utilization of Waste Energy outside.④Contribution to society by “Eco-products” and by-products.⑤ International Technology Transfer⑤ International Technology Transfer.
*JISF: Japan Iron and Steel Federation
5The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
Overview of performance(Steel Industry in Japan total, 2006)
3-A. Uni-lateral（VAP)
Household/Office
Inside of Steelworks(Unit:Mt-CO2/year)
Outside of Steelworks
Products & by-products
-12.4Mｔ-CO2/y-5.1%
E CO2
Transport
Eco-Products-7.9Mt-CO2/y(2006)
-10.5 Mｔ-CO2/y193.3
Energy-CO2203.7
Crude steel 112 118mt/y1990 2006
Forest
Technology TransferCement(BF slag)
Cross-Sector
CO2 Global reduction Kyoto mechanism BF slag
-8.8Mt-CO 2
-4.6Mt-CO2/y+abroad 4.6)
-4.6/y
Long-term R&D, Post Kyoto 6The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
JapanJapan--China Steel Industry Advanced China Steel Industry Advanced Technology Exchange Meeting in Technology Exchange Meeting in
3-B. Japan-China Steel
44--5 July 20055 July 2005
gy g ggy g gEnvironmental Protection & EnergyEnvironmental Protection & Energy--SavingSaving
:the 1:the 1stst meeting in Beijing Chinameeting in Beijing China44 5 July 20055 July 200511--2 Nov. 20062 Nov. 200628 Sep. 200728 Sep. 2007
:the 1:the 1 meeting in Beijing, Chinameeting in Beijing, China:the 2:the 2ndnd meeting in Beppu, Japanmeeting in Beppu, Japan (#1 Expert meeting)(#1 Expert meeting):the 3:the 3rdrd meeting in Beijing, China (#2 Expert meeting)meeting in Beijing, China (#2 Expert meeting)
Importance of technical exchanges in the area of environmental preservation and energy-saving technologies, from the standpoint of the effective use of resources and the preservation
Common Understanding
saving technologies, from the standpoint of the effective use of resources and the preservationof the global environment.
i SAgreementTo realize the above, the Japan Iron and Steel Federation and the China Iron and Steel Association will continue exchanges of information and experts on environmental preservation and energy-saving.
7The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
Overview of APP 3-C. APP
APP denotes Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. This initiative was started in January 2006 This covers energy security and climateinitiative was started in January 2006. This covers energy security and climate change issues etc. as a regional partnership.
【Asia-Pacific countries participation 】– Seven nations: Japan、USA、Australia、Korea、China、India、Canada
【Focusing on Energy and SOX/NOX issues】【 g gy 】
【Government-Private Partnership with small number of nations】
• Huge potential for CO2 emissions reductionCharacteristics
of APP
Huge potential for CO2 emissions reduction– APP seven nations CO2 emissions are approx. 60% or a whole world.
• Technology oriented, sector-based and bottom-up approach
• Government-Private collaborations non-legally bindingi f i d i l f i d- Dynamism of private sector and potential for R&D activated
8The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
APP structure 3-C. APP
PIC( ) : Chair
Ministerial
PIC(USA)
C G G Al i i C C A
PIC: Policy and implementation Committee
CFE(Australia)
REDG(Korea)
PTG(USA)
Steel(Japan)
Aluminium
(Australia)Cement
(Japan)Coal (USA)
BA (Korea)
＜B fit f t b d h＞
CFE: Cleaner Fossil Energy, REDG: Renewable Energy and Distributed Generation, PGT: Power Generation and Transmission, Coal: Coal Mining, BA: Buildings and Appliances
＜Benefit of sector-based approach＞• Based on the actual technical situations of each sector, it is possible to evaluate
accurate and practical potential of CO2 emissions reduction. • Energy efficiency of developed and developing countries can be evaluated. • Best practices can be shared in the easier way. • Practical projects can be Implemented.
9The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
・Agreed on Action Plan・Zero-order-draft for SOACT (State-of-th-art Clean Technology Handbook)・Methodology for the diffusion-rate Survey
Identifying 101 technology For energy-saving and environment
SOACT Handbook
Coherent and common2nd TF（September 2006）・Japan
・Results of diffusion survey・Methodology for energy efficiency survey
Most important 17 technologySite-by-site diffusion survey
Coherent and common Methodology for energy survey（A common boundary definition
And coefficients）agreed
2nd TF（September 2006）・Japan
・Reduction Potential evaluated by diffusion survey・Agreed on the methodology for energy efficiency survey
Methodology for energyEfficiency survey agreed(the 1st challenge in the world)
CO2 reduction potentialEvaluated by the results From diffusion survey
3rd TF（March 2007）・India
・First-order-draft for SOACT
・Performance indexes and energy efficiency survey
Outcomes of survey Reduction potentialin details4th TF（October 2007）・Australia
gy y y・Site visit in China and India・Measures for promoting technology transfer and diffusion Discussion on performance indexes
5th TF（Spring 2008） ・Korea
Further discussions○ A guideline for information sharing and disclosure○ A procedures for target setting
Further discussions○ A guideline for information sharing and disclosure○ A procedures for target setting
p g
○ p g g○ Applying to the national policy and measures○ p g g○ Applying to the national policy and measures
10The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
APP Steel Task Force Action Plan3-C. APP
Projects Steel Task Force
Chair of Project Project description
Project-1 (APP Steel workshop)
Host country (rotational basis)
-Annual exchanging information and sharing experience. Incl. On-site visits.
Project-2 Japan -Reviewing of equipment diffusion of energy saving, j(Status Review of Steel Industry Related Indicators for Energy Saving etc)
environmental protection and recycling with identification of barriers in diffusion.-Estimation of potentials for emission reduction.-A common boundary definition setting and survey ofA common boundary definition setting and survey of energy efficiency.
Project-3 (Performance Indicators Setting)
Korea (Co-chair J /USA)
-Identification of indicators for energy saving and environmental improvement.
Japan/USA) -Setting ambitious and realistic milestones.
Project-4 (Performance Diagnosis)
China, India -Site visit for performance diagnosis of energy saving and environment protection.
-Compile a comprehensive information document for global and local environment countermeasures as a bible.
A i i j i fhttp://asiapacificpartnership.org/ 11 Jan 2008
Project-5-2 (Technology Deployment)
Australia -Flagship project on the basis of plant diagnosis(project-4). 11
The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
Establish of Common Methodology3-C. APP
gyto Identity Reduction Potential and Performance Benchmarking
Step 1: Status ReviewStep-1: Status Review
Diffusion rate of technologiesDiffusion Survey
I t it b h ki
Selection of technologies for survey from a common data base, SOACT handbook
S y
Barriers Survey
Intensity benchmarking
A common Methodology setting for benchmarking
Formula
Boundary Intensity Surveysetting for benchmarking
Conversion Factors
Step-2: Reduction potential
Step-3: Target setting 12The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
Development of Mechanism 3-C. APP
for Eligible Technology Diffusion based on Expert Diagnoses Methodology and Procedures
Step-1: Site visit (Project-4)
Fact findings On-site evaluations, candidate technologies for improvement of a particular steelworks
Compilation of all sites data and list-up
RecommendationsAppropriate and suitable implementations from SOACT for each steelworks
Energy saving
SOX, NOX etc.
the candidate projects
Step-2: Prioritization and selection of actual flagship projects using results of site visits
from SOACT for each steelworks SOX, NOX etc.
E l i d i i i i-Barriers for realization (financial, technological etc.)
-Cost-effectiveness etc.
Evaluation and prioritizationof all candidate projects
Step-3: Proposal to the Steel Task Force as actual Flagship Projects 13The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
*Work shop and Site visit*Work shop and Site visit
SAIL(Rourkela)Ispat IndustriesLtd. (Dolvi)
Rashria IspatNigam Ltd
JSW Steel
Ltd. (Dolvi)
(JVSL)15
The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
Project 2 Summary of diffusion survey 3-C. APP
20.24
0 10 20 30 40
CDQ
million t / year
5.2736.09
Coal moisture control
COG Recovery
5.1436.10
Sinter Waste Heat Recovery
BFG Recovery
5.30
3.65
y
TRT
PCI 3.65
0.86
9 57
PCI
Hot Stove Waste Heat Recovery
BOF Gas Recovery 9.57
4.98
BOF Gas Recovery
BOF Gas Sensible Heat Recovery CO2 emissions reduction Potential
127 million t-CO2/year127 million t-CO2/year
16The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
IISI’s CO2 Breakthrough Program IISI’s CO2 Breakthrough Program October 2003~October 2003~
3-D. IISIOctober 2003October 2003
North AmericanNorth American Program
KoreaProgram
JapanProgram
EUULCOSEletrolysis etc. og
*Ultra Low CO2 Steelmaking
CO2 separation
H d d i
gJISF
CCS, H2, BFG recycling with CO2 separation
South AmericanProgram
Hydrogen production etc.
Program
Phase-1: Seeds R&D （until 2008）
AustraliaProgram
Phase-2: Pilot project（2008～）
17The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
IISI New Climate Policy Statement Published in 7 May 2007
Th C it t f t l i d t
4. PositionThe Commitment of steel industry (7 main sets of actions)
“A Global issues requires Global solutions”“There is a need for a Steel specific solution”
1. Expanding the use of current efficient technologies.2. New technology solutions to radically reduce the CO2 intensity.3. Continuing to optimise and maximise the recycling of steel scrap.4. Maximising the value of steel industry by-products.5. Using the new generation of steels to improve the energy efficiency.6. Developing common and verified reporting procedures7. Adopting a global sector-specific approach p g g p pp
“The Expert Group set up by the Board is busy working on developing the framework for a global sector-specific approach. It is also establishing how the steel industry can report its present CO2 emissions which is the starting point for setting future commitments.
18The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
IISI New Climate Policy StatementPublished in 7 May 2007
F G t
4. Position
Governments need to:
For Government: 6 main sets of actions
• Replace cap and trade emission regimes with policies that allow the most efficient steel companies in terms of CO2 pemissions to expand and the least efficient to decline.
• Engage with industry to adopt a “Sector Specific” framework which involves all major steel producing countries.j p g
• Establish recycling rules for “Steel-to-Steel recycling” as a closed-loop which encourages market-based recycling as used in the steel industry.
• Encourage the closure and replacement of the least efficient steelmaking g p gplants.
• Support the long-term research initiatives for radical new technology solutions proposed by the steel industry. Government also need to develop policies that
d t ti f th i ti t h l iencourage demonstration of these innovative technologies. • Engage with industry develop reporting procedures that account for and report
progress towards achieving CO2 emission reductions.
19The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
Summary 5. Conclusion
1) Participation of all major emitters (countries, sectors, entities ~)
2) Technology ~Solution- Diffusion of best practice and technology- CO2 Breakthrough Technologies
3) Sector-based and technology-based collaborations - “Sectoral Approach”
4) Taking action toward a challenging target4) Taking action toward a challenging target- “Global top-runner (front-runner) - Challenging target with pledge and review
5) Mechanisms for promoting and accelerating technology transfer and R&D5) Mechanisms for promoting and accelerating technology transfer and R&D
6) Collaboration through APP and IISI etc. - Asia-Pacific model.
20The 3rd Symposium of Japan-UK Joint Research Project on Low-Carbon Societies, JISF Wednesday 13 February 2008
Appendix: Energy efficiency/CO2 intensity benchmarking
Baseline-2: Baseline/average or less
Baseline-1: Global top-runner(front-runner), “industrial ultimate”
