Stefan Ripka, Hagen Lind, Matthias Wangenheim, University Hannover

Stefan Ripka, Hagen Lind,Matthias Wangenheim, University Hannover

Klaus Wiese, Burkhard Wies, Continental

Akron, 20.09.2010

Investigation of friction mechanisms of siped tire tread blocks on snowy and icy surfaces

© 2010 Stefan Ripka, Leibniz Universität Hannover

Tread block mechanics on ice and snow

Agenda

• Introduction and motivation

• The high speed linear test rig “HiLiTe”

• Set up

• Validation with outdoor tests

• Friction mechanisms on ice

• Basics

• Measurements and Interpretation

• Conclusion



Introduction and motivation

• Decreasing friction potential of the road results in an increasing probability of accident

• Reduction of development costs by

• Understanding relevant friction mechanisms of tread blocks on ice and snow

• Transfer of tests to the all year available lab

Source: Continental

• Winter tires gain more and more attention due to safety reasons

Rising requirement of customers concerning tire performance

Effort of the tire industry for improving the tire characteristics




• ABS system makes sure that the slip of a tire is reduced to a minimum

Cornering forces can still be transmitted to the ground

• But there is still a zone left, where the tire slips over the road surface!

• During a braking manoeuvre a wide range of sliding velocities can thus be observed

Test rig needs to cover a wide parameter range for closer investigations



High speed linear test rig „HiLiTe“• Bedding on concrete block

(m = 3 t) and styrofoam

• Powered by synchronous servo motor (T = 125 Nm)

• Travelling carriage is driven with tooth belt and performs linear motion

• Challenge: Compromise between mechanical stability and weight

Bedding

Carriage

Synchronous servo motor

Test Track

Tooth belt Rectangularprofile



High speed linear test rig „HiLiTe“

Friction surfaces

• Glass / Corundum (different grid)

• Asphalt / Concrete

• Ice / Snow

Additional equipment:

• IR-camera

• High speed camera

Design Parameters

• Rubber sample: Tread block

• Sliding velocity v = 0.1 … 10 m/s

• Normal force FN = 23 … 1000 N

• Length of friction surface l = 5 m

• Located in environmental chamber

Temperature T = -25 °C … + 60 °C



Evaluation of measurements

• Steady state time interval is characterized by constant velocity

• Friction coefficient µ(t) is calculated for each time step from friction force FR(t) divided by normal force FN(t)

• Characteristic friction coefficient is calculated via the average of the steady state time interval of µ(t)



Basic friction mechanisms on ice

• Dry run in area of tread block Due to friction energy P ice is heated up Liquid layer:

• Friction force FR consists of dry friction Fd and viscous friction Fv

• Length of dry area depends on friction energy Influenced by sliding velocity v, normal force FN, temperature T, …

• Low friction level on ice caused by viscous friction due to liquid layer

vFP R

h

AvApµFFF wetdrydryvdR



Compound evaluation with HiLiTe on ice

• Comparison of different tread compounds (Ref, A, B, C, D): HiLiTe vs. Outdoor

• Outdoor test: car is accelerated, acceleration and slip are measured, µ-slip curve is calculated and evaluated

• Indoor test: Several runs of each sample with different sliding velocities

• Best fit of results for a sliding velocity of v= 5 m/s but correct ranking of compounds for all sliding velocities

Compound evaluation is velocity independent (Different friction levels at higher velocities caused by reduction of adhesion / dry friction zone)



Pattern evaluation with HiLiTe on ice

• In general siped winter tires show better performance on ice than non siped tires (for standard winter compounds)

• Investigation of pattern effects with HiLiTe: Siped (G3) vs. non siped (G0) sample for different compounds (REF, A, B, C, D)

• A ratio larger than 100% means a higher friction coefficient for siped block

Pattern effects on ice depend on sliding velocity (increasing velocity increasing friction power increasing liquid layer, decreasing dry friction zone decreasing viscous friction force

• Sipes interrupt liquid layer new dry friction higher friction coefficient for siped samples or winter tires

Source: Continental

G0

G3



Flexible Treadblock

• Allows flexible arrangement of block elements

• Allows bordering single angles of block elements

• Different distances can be created

• Holder can be turned (0-360°) side forces can be measured as well



Variation of fixing method of tread elements

• Blocked tread block sample: No element deformation can occur

• Clamped sample: Simulation of bending deformation only

• Friction coefficient is significantly influenced by fixing method of sample

• Reason for significant difference becomes clear analyzing the contact area



Evaluation of dynamic contact area on ice: Test set up

• Tread block sample is observed while sliding on ice

• Clear ice surface to observe the tread block sample from the bottom up

• Ice surface is prepared on glass

• Camera takes picture from contact area

Detailed analysis of contact area size possible

Camera

HiLiTe carriage

Glass surface with ice layer



Investigation of dynamic contact area

FN=72N, v=0,1m/s, µ=1,38 FN=72N, v=0,1m/s, µ=0,4

1 bar 3 bar

ca. 22% ca. 38%• Comparison of different contact areas (bordered (grey) vs. 20°

clamped block element (black)) during friction measurement on ice at two different pressures

• Significant differences of contact area size can be observed!

Clamped sample shows 60-80% smaller contact area size

• Significant influence of the contact area on the friction process: Higher local pressure higher friction energy density increasing liquid layer, decreasing dry friction zone decreasing friction coefficient



Pressure dependence of friction coefficient

• With different fixing methods of block sample overall friction characteristic can be calculated

• Contact pressure is calculated from global vertical load and contact area: non deformed sample (p1=1 bar and p2=3 bar)

clamped sample (p3=4,5 bar and p4=7,9 bar)

• Friction coefficient (from clamped sample) fits into global decreasing pressure characteristic

Local pressure and therefore contact area size influence friction process significantly

G0



Conclusion

FN=72N, v=0,1m/s, µ=1,38 FN=72N, v=0,1m/s, µ=0,4

• The friction level of the road has a significant influence on the accident probability

• High speed linear test rig allows investigating typical pressures and sliding velocities which prevail at passenger car tires

• Basic tread block friction mechanisms on ice have been introduced

• The validation of HiLiTe measurements on ice with outdoor traction test was successful

• A method for analyzing the contact area during the sliding process was presented

• The influence of the contact area on the friction process of tread block elements was demonstrated and explained

Stefan RipkaInstitut für Dynamik und SchwingungenGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität HannoverAppelstraße 11, 30167 Hannover

[email protected]

www.ids.uni-hannover.de

Thank you for your attention !



Comparison of frictional properties of in house vs. natural snow

• In the measured velocity range friction coefficient is relatively constant compared to ice friction

Dominant friction effect is snow milling which can be observed on natural and in house snow

• Differences of friction level results from different surface hardness (from sintering process of the snow)

2 cm

• PC-traction measurements from outside with similar tread pattern show same result: Traction force is nearly constant over a wide slip range

natural snow

(CTI=90, =525kg/m³)

in house produced snow

(CTI=92, =510kg/m³)



Influence of tread elements run out area

• Neighbored elements / elements width influence friction on ice:

Last element slides on track heated up by first element

Back part of larger elements slides on liquid layer

• Differences between single element configurations caused by different block element widths resulting in different contact areas

Liquid layer reduces friction potential

Optimum block width can be found



Siped tread block model - Requirements -

• Properties of tread block elements:

– length and depth

– mass, stiffness, damping

– 3D - model needs additional block width

• Number of sipes

• Distance between single elements possibility to generate two neighboured blocks

• Friction within the sipe

• Less computational effort compared to FEA

Output parameter: Deformation angle of each block element



Siped tread block model-Timoshenko beam

• Timoshenko beam considers longitudinal (x, u) andtransversal (z,w) movement, also includes shear deformation

• Contact problems (bar-bar/bar-surface) solved via penalty method

• The friction Force FR is calculated via the law of Coulomb, friction coefficient µ can be adopted to every friction characteristic

• Friction characteristic considers all friction phenomena like pressure and velocity dependence, contact area, surface material and surface texture



Simulation results of Timoshenko beam model

• Simulation result for a beam with d = 6 mm and l = 4 mm

• After the run-in process the steady state of the transversal and longitudinal deflection as well as the shear angle can be observed

• Transversal deflection w 0,9 mm matches very well in experiment and simulation

• Shear angle b 1,7 ° is much too small Tire tread specific parameters for simulation to be defined in the future

In general the Timoshenko beam provides a satisfying approach for simulating the bending angle of single tread blocks




• Winter tires gain more and more attention due to safety reasons

Rising requirement of customers concerning tire performance

Effort of the tire industry for improving the tire characteristics

• Reduction of development costs by

• understanding relevant friction mechanisms of tread blocks on ice and snow

• Transfer of tests to the all year available lab

Source: Continental

Date post:	03-Jan-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	yasir-wheeler
View:	69 times
Download:	0 times

Stefan Ripka, Hagen Lind, Matthias Wangenheim, University Hannover

Documents