34
| Date post: | 17-Jan-2016 |
| Category: |
Documents |
| Upload: | elfrieda-little |
| View: | 214 times |
| Download: | 0 times |
“Step” n2 M-STAR!Strategic Tools for
Educator Preparation This training was designed to support the
training effort of all Mississippi educators to learn the M-STAR process.
M-STAR is a tool for you to use as a road map to success in your classroom.
Today, learn the basics of this process and prepare to use it for your professional growth.
More training is coming your way, and we are excited to bring it to you.
Objectives of This Training
To introduce the Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric (M-STAR) to Mississippi teachers
To help teachers acquire knowledge and understanding of M-STAR
To increase teacher effectiveness To promote higher levels of achievement for
all students
The research and dataare clear!
“Teacher quality is the single most important variable
impacting student achievement.”
(Rivkin, Hanushek & Kain, 2005; Rockoff, 2004)
What do teachers want to know?
Why an appraisal system now?
Under previous systems of evaluating teachers’ work, the scores teachers have received have become separated from the key output – student learning.
Teachers have received considerably higher ratings than test results suggest should be the case.
Meaningful evaluations start with a well-designed system. But ultimately the system’s success depends on strong implementation with good communication at its core.
What have your previous evaluations been like?
Were theyConsistent throughout your school and
district?Completed each semester?Informative to you?Helpful in your professional growth?Grounded in best practices and research?
Most Important Reason for Effective Appraisals
Student Achievement• U.S. ranks 17th in industrialized nations in education• In Mississippi, almost 50% of children in 3rd-8th grade are
below grade level in language arts and math.• Low graduation rates!• Students not equipped with 21st-century skills!
Whose job is it to improve these outcomes? All Mississippi educators!
Federal and State Theory of Action
Improved Evaluation
System
Improved Educator Quality
Improved Student
Outcomes
How is M-STAR different?Traditional Observations Evidence-Based
Observations
• Single time point for classroom observation
• Multiple time points for classroom observation
• Use of “checklist” tools (strengths/weakness, yes/no)
• Use of rubric that defines instructional improvement on a continuum
• High performance ratings given to almost all teachers
• Variations in performance ratings among teachers
• Does not include student outcomes
• Links teacher effectiveness to student performance
MS Teacher Evaluation
50%
30%
20%
Percentage Breakdown
Student Growth
Classroom Observation: M-STAR
Professional Growth Goals
M-STAR
M-Star Timeline
2011-2012 Pilot implemented with 20 schools in Mississippi
January – July 2012 Focus group review and feedback
July 2012 – July 2013 Statewide training on use of the system
2013-2014 Field test the M-STAR process
2014-2015 Full implementation
More Questions from Teachers
Is my pay going to decrease?Do I have to do this?What is in it for me?
Observation Cycle
Pre-Obs.Conf.
Within 1-2 days prior to obs
Obs.Post-Obs.
ConferenceWithin 1 week after
ob.
Follow-up Walkthrough
Within 2 weeks after post-obs. conference
Effective, concrete feedback + next steps are key!
Observe feedback in action
Key Questions: What are students learning? What is the evidence for this
learning?
Review lesson plan, understand context,
+ ask clarifying questions
Five Components of the Teacher Observation Cycle
1. Teacher self-assessment2. Professional Growth Goals (PGG) and Student
Learning Objectives (SLO) - MDE will have additional training in the future on these items.
3. Walk-through visits4. Formal observations and conferences5. Student surveys (optional)
M-STAR RatingsA teacher’s performance on each standard will be appraised in accordance with a four-level rating scale: Level 4 Distinguished: Indicates that the teacher’s performance
consistently exceeds expectations – exemplary; cream of the crop!
Level 3 Effective: Indicates that the teacher’s performance meets expectations. Learning is evident!
Level 2 Emerging: Indicates that the teacher’s performance inconsistently meets expectations. PD is needed as teacher continues to learn more about the science of teaching and learning.
Level 1 Unsatisfactory: Indicates that the teacher’s performance does not meet expectations. An immediate plan of improvement should be designed by the administrator and teacher.
Example: Summative Observation Rating
Domain Domain Score
Weight Weighted Rating
I: Planning 2.75 x .20 .55
II: Assessment 4 x .20 .80
III: Instruction 2.5 x .20 .50
IV: Learning Environment 3.5 x .20 .70
V: Professional Responsibilities 2.5 x .20 .50
Summative Classroom Observation Rating 3.05
17
(2.75 + 4 + 2.5 + 3.5 + 2.5) = 3.055
SPRING
SCORING
What does the rubric mean?
The M-STAR rubric can be difficult to understand. What can I do to simplify it?
It is important to fully understand
the rubric!
M-STAR Rubric Overview
Five domains (weighted equally)1. Planning (4 standards)
2. Assessment (2 standards)
3. Instruction (5 standards)
4. Learning Environment (5 standards)
5. Professional Responsibilities (4 standards)
20 standards (placed among the 5 domains)
A Closer Look
Look at your copy of theM-STAR appraisal rubric. Find Domains Locate Standards Identify the Indicators Examine Domains III and IV
What do best practices look like?
Don’t get lost in what the standards are saying. . .
Instead, focus on whatbehaviors will be seen whenan effective teacher andhis/her students are observed.
Actively engages students in the learning process
Teachers will be:• Using a variety of teaching
strategies and resources• Teaching appropriate for skill
levels and different learning styles
• Linking content with student interests
• Probing and incorporating students’ questions
• As a facilitator, he/she is able to grasp and hold students’ attention.
• Using a wide range of learning skills and technology to enhance learning
• Within close proximity to students• Exhibiting excitement and interest
in lesson and students• Leading a student-centered
classroom
Can you think of other evidence of engaging students in learning?
Standard 8
Actively engages students in the learning process
Students will be:• Asking and answering questions• Their questions reflect applicable understanding of content• Responding to formative assessments• Using technology to access, interpret, and apply information• Demonstrating interest in lesson/activity• Learning on their level; engaged
What else will they be doing if they are truly engaged?
Standard 8
What are artifacts? Real working documents that
provide evidence of the standards
Administrators will talk with you further about what artifacts are important
Artifacts are not “portfolios” or decorated boxes that are time consuming to organize!!
Are we reaching our students?
What is a 21st-
century educator?
M-STAR Key Points
Student-centered vs. teacher-centered
Rubric is not a checklist but used to evaluate where a “preponderance of evidence” points on the rating scale.
Conversations and FACE-TO-FACE feedback are key pieces in improving teacher practice.
Stay focused on clear communication, which is transparent and professional.
Will it be some work?
Yes. . . but you work hard everyday.
Develop Your M-STAR Cruise Plan
Any Questions?
Exit Slips
For More Information
Contact:
MDE Quality Professionals and Special Schools601.359.3631
For More Information
Check out the RCU website:
www.rcu.msstate.edu
Under the MDE tab, go to the M-STAR tab and find great reference items put
there for you.
Contact Information
Lois Kappler, M-STAR Coach
[email protected] (w)662.546.0066 (c)
Call or text – leave a message with your information and your call will be returned.
