1. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIORCONCEPTS CONTROVERSIES APPLICATIONS Seventh Edition Stephen P. Robbins 1996

2. ContentsPart One IntroductionChapter 1 What Is Organizational Behavior? 2Chapter 2 Responding to Global and Cultural Diversity 42Part Two The IndividualChapter 3 Foundations of Individual Behavior 80Chapter 4 Perception and Individual Decision Making 130Chapter 5 Values, Attitudes, and Job Satisfaction 172Chapter 6 Basic Motivation Concepts 210Chapter 7 Motivation: From Concepts to Applications 250Part Three The GroupChapter 8 Foundations of Group Behavior 292Chapter 9 Understanding Work Teams 344Chapter 10 Communication 374Chapter 11 Leadership 410Chapter 12 Power and Politics 460Chapter 13 Conflict, Negotiation, and Intergroup Behavior 502Part Four - The Organization SystemChapter 14 Foundations of Organization Structure 548Chapter 15 Technology, Work Design, and Stress 588Chapter 16 Human Resource Policies and Practices 634Chapter 17 Organizational Culture 678Part Five - Organizational DynamicsChapter 18 Organizational Change and Development 714

3. CHAPTER I WHAT IS ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR?What Managers DoLets begin by briefly defining the terms manager and the place where managers workthe organization.Then lets look at the managers job; specifically, what do managers do?Managers get things done through other people. They make decisions, allocate resources, and direct theactivities of others to attain goals. Managers do their work in an organization. This is a consciouslycoordinated social unit, composed of two or more people, that functions on a relatively continuous basisto achieve a common goal or set of goals. Based on this definition, manufacturing and service firms areorganizations and so are schools, hospitals, churches, military units, retail stores, police departments, andlocal, state, and federal government agencies. The people who oversee the activities of others and who areresponsible for attaining goals in these organizations are their managers (although theyre sometimescalled administrators, especially in not- for-profit organizations).Management FunctionsIn the early part of this century, a French industrialist by the name of Henri Fayol wrote that all managersperform five management functions: They plan, organize, command, coordinate, and control. Today,weve condensed these down to four: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling.If you dont know where youre going, any road will get you there. Since organizations exist to achievegoals, someone has to define these goals and the means by which they can be achieved. Management isthat someone. The planning function encompasses defining an organizations goals, establishing anoverall strategy for achieving these goals, and developing a comprehensive hierarchy of plans to integrateand coordinate activities.Managers are also responsible for designing an organizations structure. We call this function organizing.It includes the determination of what tasks are to be done, who is to do them, how the tasks are to begrouped, who reports to whom, and where decisions are to be made.Every organization contains people, and it is managements job to direct and coordinate these people.This is the leading function. When managers motivate subordinates, direct the activities of others, selectthe most effective communication channel, or resolve conflicts among members, they are engaging inleadingThe final function managers perform is controlling. After the goals are set, the plans formulated, thestructural arrangements delineated, and the people hired, trained, and motivated, there is still thepossibility that some thing may go amiss. To ensure that things are going as they should, managementmust monitor the organizations performance. Actual performance must be compared with the previouslyset goals. If there are any significant deviations, it is managements job to get the organization back ontrack. This monitoring, comparing, and potential correcting is what is meant by the controlling function.So, using the functional approach, the answer to the question of what managers do is that they plan,organize, lead, and control.Management RolesIn the late 1960s, a graduate student at MIT, Henry Mintzberg, undertook a careful study of fiveexecutives to determine what these managers did on their jobs. Based on his observations of thesemanagers, Mintzberg concluded that managers perform ten different highly interrelated roles, or sets of

4. behaviors, attributable to their jobs. These ten roles can be grouped as being primarily concerned withinterpersonal relationships, the transfer of information, and decision making.INTERPERSONAL ROLES All managers are required to perform duties that are ceremonial andsymbolic in nature. When the president of a college hands out diplomas at commencement or a factorysupervisor gives a group of highschool students a tour of the plant, he or she is acting in a figurehead role.All managers have a leadership role. This role includes hiring, training, motivating, and discipliningemployees. The third role within the interpersonal grouping is the liaison role. Mintzberg described thisactivity as contacting outsiders who provide the manager with information. These may be individuals orgroups inside or outside the organization. The sales manager whb obtains information from the personnelmanager in his or her own company has an internal liaison relationship. When that sales manager hascontacts with other sales executives through a marketing trade association, he or she has an outside liaisonrelationship.INFORMATIONAL ROLES All managers wills to some degree, receive and collect information fromorganizations and institutions outside their own. Typically, this is done through reading magazines andtalking with others to learn of changes in the pubtics tastes, what competitors may be planning, and thelike. Mintzberg called this the monitor role. Managers also act as a conduit to transmit information toorganizational members. This is the diseminator role. Managers additionally perform a spokesperson rolewhen they represent the organization to outsiders.DECISIONAL ROLES Finally, Mintzherg identified four roles that revolve around the making of choices.In the entrepreneur role, managers initiate and oversee new projects that will improve their organizationsperformance. As disturbance handlers, managers take corrective action in response to previouslyunforeseen problems As resource allocators, managers are responsib]e for allocating human, physical,and monetary resources. Lastly, managers perform a negotiator role, in which they discuss and bargainwith other units to gain advantages for their own unit.Management SkillsStill another way of considering what managers do is to look at the skills or competencies they need tosuccessfully achieve their goals. Robert Katz has identified three essential management skills: technical,human, and conceptual.Technical skills encompass the ability to apply the ability to apply specialized knowledge or expertise.When you think of the skills held by professiorials such as civil engineers, tax accountants, or oralsurgeons, you typically focus on their technical skills. Through extensive formal education, they havelearned the special knowledge and practices of their field. Of course, professional dont have a monopolyon technical skills and these skills dont have to be learned in schools or formal training programs. Alljobs require some specialized expertise and many people develop their technical skills on the job.The ability to work with, understand, and motivate other people, both individually and in groups,describes human skills. Many people are technically proficient but interpersonally incompetent. Theymight, for example, be poor listeners, unable to understand the needs of others, or have difficultymanaging conflicts. Since managers get things done through other people, they must have good humanskills to communicate, motivate, and delegate.Managers must have the mental ability to analyze and diagnose complex situations. These are conceptualskills. Decision making, for instance, requires managers to spot problems, identify alternatives that cancorrect them, evaluate these alternatives, and select the best one. Managers can be technically andinterpersonally competent, yet still fail because of an inability to rationally process and interpretinformation.

5. Effective vs. Successful Managerial ActivitiesFred Luthans and his associates looked at the issue of what managers do from a somewhat differentperspective. They asked this question: Do managers who move up most quickiy in an organization do thesame activities and with the same emphasis as those managers who do the best job? You would tend tothink that those managers who were the most effective in their jobs would also be the ones who werepromoted fastest. But thats not what appears to happen.Luthans and his associates studied more than 450 managers. What they found was that these managers allengaged in four managerial activities:1. Traditional management: Decision making, planning, and controlling.2. Communication: Exchanging routine information and processing paperwork.3. Human resource management: Motivating, disciplining, managing conflict, staffing, and training.4. Networking: Socializing, politicking, and interacting with outsiders.The average manager studied spent 32 percent of his or her time in traditional management activities,29 percent communicating, 20 percent in human resource management activities, and 19 percentnetworking. However, the amount of time and effort that different managers spent on these four activitiesvaried a great deat Specifically, managers who were successful (defined in terms of the speed ofpromotion within their organization) had a very different emphasis than managers who were effective(defined in terms of the quantity and quality of their performance and the satisfaction and commitment oftheir subordinates). Networking made the biggest relative contribution to manager success; humanresource management activities made the least relative contribution. Among effective managers,communication made the largest relative contribution and networking the least.This study adds important insights to our knowledge of what managers do. On average, managers spendapproximately 20 to 30 percent of their time on each of the four activities: traditional management,communication, human resource management, and networking. However, successful managers dont givethe same emphasis to each of these activities as do effective managers. In fact, their emphases are almostthe opposite. This challenges the historical assumption that promotions are based on performance, vividlyillustrating the importance that social and political skills play in getting ahead in organizations.A Review of the Managers JobOne common thread runs through the functions, roles, skills, and activities approaches to management:Each recognizes the paramount importance of managing people. As David Kwok found out when hebecame a manager at The Princeton Review, regardless of whether its called the leading function,interpersonal roles, human skills, or human resource management and networking activities, itsclear that managers need to develop their people skills if theyre going to be effective and successful intheir job.Enter organizational behaviorWeve made the case for the importance of people skills. But neither this book nor the discipline onwhich it rests is called people skills. The term that is widely used to describe the discipline is calledorganizational behavior (OR) which is a field of study which investiqates the impact study thatinvestigates the impact of individuals, groups, and structure on behavior moi individuak, groups, awistructure ha within organizations for the purpose of applying such knowledge toward improving an onbchnvr wilfirn orgarniations, for the organization c effectiveness. Thats a lot of words, so lets break itdown. purpeseof eppln suth bov4edpe Organizational behavior is a field of study. What does it study? Itstudies three determinants of behavior in organizations: individuals, groups, and structure. Additionally,

6. 0B applies the knowledge gained about individuals, groups, and the effect of structure on behavior inorder to wake organizations work more effectively. To sum up our definition, OB is concerned with thestudy of what people do in an organization and howthat behavior affects the performance of theorganization. And because OR is specifically concerned with employment-related situations, you shouldnot be surprised to find that it emphasizes behavior as related to jobs, work, absenteeism, employmentturnover, productivity, human performance, and management. There is increasing agreement on thecomponents or topics that constitute the subject area of OW While there is still considerable debate aboutthe relative importance of each, there appears to be general agreement that OB includes the core topics ofmotivation, leader behavior and power, interpersonal communication, group structure and process,learning, attitude development and perception, change processes, conflict, job design, and work stress) Replacing Intuition with Sysfirnatic Study Each of us is a student of behavior. Since our earliestyears, we have watched the actions of others and have attempted to interpret what we see. Whether or notyou have explicitly thought about it before, you have been reading peopie almost all your life. Youwatch what others do and try to explain to yourself why they have engaged in their behavior.Additionally, youve attempted to predict what they might do under different sets of conditions.Generalizations About Behavior You have already developed some generalizations that you find helpfulin explaining and predicting what people do and will do. But how did you arrive at these generalizations?You did so by observing, sensing, asking, listening, and reading. That is, your understanding comes eitherdirectly from your own eperience with things in the environment, or secondhand, through the experienceof others. How accurate are the generalizations you hold? Some may represent extremely sophisticatedappraisals of behavior and may prove highly effective in expiaining and prethcting the behavior of others.However, most of us also carry with us a number of beliefs that frequently fail to explain why people do.CHAPTER I WHAT IS ORGANATIONAL BEHAVIOR what they do. To illustrate, consider thefollowing statements about work. related behavior: 1. Happy workers are productive workers. 2. Allindividuals are most productive when their boss is fricndly, trusting; arid approachable. 3. Interviews areeffective selection devices for separating ob applicants who would be high-performing employees fromthose who would be low performers. 4. Everyone wants a challenging job. 5. You have to scare people alittle to get them to do their jobs. 6. Everyone is motivated by money. 7. Most people are much moreconcerned with the size of their own salaries than with others. 8. The most effective work groups aredevoid of conflict. How many of these statements do you think are true? For the most part, they are allfalse, and we touch on each later in this text. But whether these statements are true or false is not reallyimportant at this time. What is important is to be aware that many of the views you hold concerninghuman behavior are based on intuition rather than fact. As a result, a systematic approach to the study ofbehavior can improve your explanatory and predictive abilitks. Consistency vs. Individual DifferencesCasual or commonsense approaches to obtaining knowledge about human behavior are inadequate. Inreading this text, you will discover that a systematic approach will uncover important facts andrelationships, and provide a base from which more accurate predictions of behavior can be made.Underlying this systematic approach is the belief that behavior is not random, It is caused and directedtoward some end that the individual believes, rightly or wrongly, is in his or her best interest. Behaviorgenerally is predictable if we know how the person perceived the situation arid what is important to himor her. While peoples behavior may not appear to be rational to an outsider, there is reason to believe itusually is intended to be rational and it is seen as rational by them. An observer often sees behavior asnonrational because the observer does not have access to the same information or does not perceive theenvironment in the same way.3 Certainly there are differences between tndividuals. Placed in similarsituations, all people do not act alike. However, certain fundamental consistencies underlie the behaviorof all individuals that Can be identified and then modified to reflect individual differences, Thesefundamenta] consistencies are very important. Why? Because they allow predictability. When you gelinto your car, you make some definite and usually highly accurate predictions about how other people

7. will behave. In North America, for instance, you would predict that other drivers will stop at stop signsand red lights, drive oct the right side of the road, pass on your left, and not cross the solid double line onmountain roads. Notice that your predictions about the behavior of people behind the wheels of their carsare almost always correct. Obviously, the rules of driving make predictions about driving behavior fairlyeasy. 12 PART ON INTRODUCTION o ts us ho nt I ler4p n the hew ar 4 a i g o si oiled us on9001 uti *00 u di ohs sc vde 1o LlflOe i& h ki: ,e,J:rcuo Juobv 0! ev die ri s (MI di 0 ra cv, cc nd ohodin s *og olehh Mdiii unrn n s hoe c MI nh , e 0 ri, on If doely I systematic study Looking atrelationships, attempting to attribute causes and effects, and drawing conclusions based on scienficevidence. intuit,on A feeling nol necessarily supported by research. What may be less obvious is thatthere are rules (written and unwritten) in almost every setting. Therefore, it can be argued that itspossible to predict behavior (undoubtedly not always with 100 percent accuracy) in supermarkets,classrooms, doctors offices, elevators, and in most structured situations. To Illustrate further, do you turnaround and face the doors when you get into an elevator? Almost everyone does, yet did you ever readyoure supposed to do this? Probably notl Just as I make predictions about automobile drivers (wherethere are definite rules of the road), I can make predictions about the behavior of people in elevators(where there are few written rules). In a class of 60 students, if you wanted to ask a question of theinstructor, I would predict you would raise your hand. Why dont you clap, stand up, raise your leg,cough, or yell, Hey, over herd? The reason is that you have learned raising your hand is appropriatebehavior in school. These examples support a major contention in this text: Behavior is generallypredictable, and the systematic study of behavior is a means to making reasonably accurate predictions.When we use the phrase systematic study, we mean looking at relationships, attempting to attributecauses and effects, and basing our conclusions on scientific evidence, that is, on data gathered undercontrolled conditions and measured and interpreted in a reasonably rigorous manner. (See Appendix B fora basic review of iesearch methods used in studies of organizational behavior.) Systematic study replacesIntuition or those gut feelings about why I do what I do and what makes others tick. Of course, asystematic approach does not mean those things you have come to believe in an unsystematic way arenecessarily incorrect. Some of the conclusions we make in this text, based on reasonably substantiveresearch findings, will only support what you always knew was true. But you will also be exposed toresearch evidence that runs counter to what you may have thought was common sense. In fact, one of thechallenges of teaching a subject like organizational behavior is to overcome the notion, held by many,that its all common sense.14 You will find that many of the so-called commonsense views you holdabout human behavior are, on closer examination, wrong. Moreover, what one person considers commonsense frequently runs counter to anothers version of common sense. Are leaders born or made? Whatis it that motivates people at work nowadays? You probably have answers to such questions, andindividuals who have not reviewed the research are likely to differ on their answers. The point is that oneof the objectives of this text is to encourage you to move away from your intuitive views of behaviortoward a systematic analysis, in the belief that such analysis will improve your accuracy in explaining andpredicting behavior. CHAPTER I WHAT 5 ORGANIZATIONAL BHAYIOR? 13 Challenges andOpportunities tar GB Understanding organizational behavior has never been more important formanagers. A quick look at a few of the dramatic changes now taking plaEe in organizaticins supportsthis claim. For instance, the typical employee is getting older; more and more women and nonwhites arein the workplace; corporate restructuring and cost cutting are severing the bonds of loyalty thathistorically tied many employees to their employers; and global competition is requiring employees tobe- come more flexible and to learn to cope with rapid change and innovation. In short, there are a lot ofchallenges and opportunities today for man- -. agers to use OB concepts. In this section, we review someof the more critical issues confronting managt:s for which OB offers solutionsor at least sommeaningful insights toward solutions. Improving Quality and Productivity Tom Rossi manages in atough business. He runs a light bulb plant in Mattoon, Illinois, for General Electric. Ills business hasseentough competition from manufacturers in the United States, Europe. Japan, and evei China, To survive,hes had to cut fat, increase productivity, and improve quality. And hes succeeded. Between 1988 and1993, the Mattoon plant has averaged annual cost productivity improvements of approximately 8 percent.By focusing on continuous improvement, streamlining processes, and cost cutting, GES Mattoon plant

8. has remained viable and profitable. More and more managers are confronting the challenges that TomRossi is facing. They are having to improve their organizations productivity and the tow qualityinMgemmt (TOMI quality of the products and services they offer. Toward improving quality andAphosophyoFinanag4mfltihathdrivefi productivity, they are implementing programs like total qualitymanagement and reengineeringprograms that require extensive emplOyee involvement. wtfactionThrough tho cordiuous We discuss total quality management (TQM) at a number of places iinrovementof ofl organlwtieaal throughout this book. As Table 1-2 describes, TQM is a philosophy of manage-processos. ;1 Table 1-2 Wh0t Is Total Quality Manngement?;0] 1 - intense k,cusr,in tb customer Thecustme. includes not only outsiders who buy the: orgarilzcitloWs oducts or seMci, b also ThtemclctmWlnen (web as shipping or aeoynt payable personnel) whaintoractwith cserve others ip theorgonizoaiori} . 2. Concern fbi corffinhtcTl impu-ovethent. TQM Woccmmi;rnerd to never beingsaiisFied. Vey good.is not good enough. Qudityan always be improved.. 3. lmprovement4n thcquolftyof everything I$eoiga&zation d0es: TQM uses a very brood definition of quality. Ii rel&es noiily ltheFinal product but bow the. orgcnitatian}wndles deliveries; how rapidly j,:resrds Jo complaints, howpolitely the phoies ore onwered. ondthiks 4. Accuroe?jsorerneni TQMiises stotiattcaltecniques tomedsure every critical performance-variable in the orpanizaliohs ofreratioris. These perforMancevadableior th&i compared ogaijistfslai4t&6i& Benhmotki to enlify problems, the problems are tracedto their reots and the couses areeliminated. 5. Empowetmen! of amp! oyees. TQM involves the popiecr1 the line in the mpr-vemen procen. Teams are widely used in TQM-prograrns as empowermentvehices for finding and solving problems. - 14+ PART ONE INTRODUCT]ON ment that is driven bythe constant attainment of customer satisfaction through the continuous improvement of all organizationalprocesses.6 TQM has implications for 03 because it requires employees to rethink what they do andbecome more involved in workplace decisions. in times of rapid and dramatic change, its someumesnecessary to approach improving quality and productivity from the perspective of 41How would we dothings around here if we were starting over from scratch? That, reenginriug in essence, is the approachof reengincering. It asks managers to reconsider Rcconid howwewouidbcdoa and how work would bedone and their organization structured if they were start- the orqanizaliam sirixtured ii they were ingover.17 To illustrate the concept of reengineering, consider a manufacturer h&riq ucciled from SOOt{h.of roller skates. His product is essentially a shoe with wheels beneath it, The typical roller skate was aleather boot with shoelaces, attached to a steel platform that held four wooden wheels. If ourmanufacturer took a continuous improvement approach to change, he would look for small increnientalimprovements that he could introduce in his product. For instance, he might consider adding hooks to theupper part of the boot for speed lacing; or changing the weight of leather used for improved comfort; orusing different bailbearings to make the wheels spin more smoothly. Now most of us are familiar within-line skates. Ihey represent a reengineering approach to rollerskates. The goal was to come up with askating device that could improve skating speed, mobility, and control. Rollerbiades fulfilled those goalsin a comp?et&y different type of shoe. The upper was made of injected plastic, made popular in skiing.Laces were replaced by easy-close clamps. And the four wheels, set in pairs of two, were replaced by fourto six in-line plastic wheels. The reenginee[ed result, which didnt look much like the traditional toIlerskate, proved universafly superior. The rest, of course, is history. In-line skates have revolutionized theroller skate business. Our point is that todays contemporary managers understand the success of anyefforts at improving quality and productivity must include their employees. These employees will notonly be a major force in carrying out changes but increasingly will participate actively in planning thosechanges. OB offers important insights into helping managers work through these changes. improvingPeople Skills We opened this chapter by demonstrating how important people skills are to managerialeffectiveness. We said, This book has been written to help both managers and potential managersdevelop those people skills. As you proceed through this text, we present relevant concepts and theo tiesthat can help you explain and predict the behavior of people at work. In addition, youll also gain insightsinto specific people skills that you can use on the job. For instance, youll learn how to be an effectivelistener, the proper way to give performance feedback, how to delegate authority, and how to createeffective teams. Moreover, youll have the opportunity to tomplete exercises that will give you insightsinto your own behavior, thc bel,avioi of others, and practice at improving your interpersonal skills.

9. Managing Work Force Diversity One of the most important and broad-based challenges curren ly facingUS. organizations is adapting to people who are different. The turin we use for describing this challengeis work force diversity. CHAPTER 1 WHAT [S ORGANIZATIONAL REHAVIOR +15 Work forcediversity means that organizations are becoming more heterogeneous in terms of gender, race, andethnicity. But the term encompasses anyone who varies from the so-called norm. In addition to the moreobvious groupswomen, African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, Asian-Americansit also includesthe physically disabled, gays and lesbians, and the elderly. We used to take a melting pot approach todifferences in organizations, assuming people who were different would somehow automatically want toassimilate. But we now recognize that employees dont set aside their cultural values and lifestylepreferences when they come to work. [he challenge for organizations, therefore, is to make themselvesmore accommodating to diverse groups of people by addressing their different lifestyles, family need,andwork styles. The melting pot assumption is being replaced by one that recognizes and valuesdifferences. 8 Havent organizations always included members of diverse groups? Yes, but they were asmall percentage of the work force and were, for the most part, ignored by large organizations. Moreover,it was assumed these minorities would seek to blend in and assimilate. The bulk of the pre-1980s workforce were male Caucasians working full time to support a nonemployed wife and school-aged children.Now such employees are the true minority! Currently, 45 percent of the U.S. labor force are women.Minorities and immigrants make up 22 percent.9 As a case in point, HewlettPackards work force is19 percent minorities and 40 percent women:t A Digital Equipnwnt Cop, plant in Boston provides apartial preview of the future. The tactorvs 350 employees include men and women from 44 countries whospeak 19 languages. When plant management issues written announcements, they are printed in English,Chinese, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Vietnamese, and Haitian Creole. Work force diversity hasimportant implications br management practice. Managers will need to shift their philosophy fromtreating everyone alike to recognizing differences and responding to those differences in ways that willHoneywells diverse global work force i includes employees who speak 29 lan- pages and represent 47cultures and 90 ethnic backgrounds. Honeywell strives to create an environment that values individualdifferences, removes barriers Ia equal opportunity, and empowers employees to develop their talentsfully. Among the advisory covndls that the company has formed to identify and resolve common issuesare the American Asian Council, American Indian Council, Block Employee Neiwork, Council ofEmployees with Disabllhies, Hispanic Council, Older Workers teogue, Committee of Vietnam Veterans,Womens Council, and Work and Family Council. work force diversity The increasing heterogeneity oforganizations with the inclusion of different groups. A fj Vne of the most important and broad-basedchallenges 1 currently facing US H organizations is adapting to people who are different - - ?rFItTTJr7flTh 164 PART ONE INTRODUC1HON I ensure employee retention and greaterproductivitywhile, at the same time, not discriminating. Diversity, if positively managed, can increasecreativity and innovation in organizations as well as improve decision making by providing differentperspectives on problems.21 When diversity is not managed properly, there is potential for higherturnover, more difficult communication, and more interpersonal conflicts. We discuss work forcediversity in greater detail in Chapter 2. Responding to Globalization Management is no longerconstrained by national borders, Burger King is owned by a Eritish firm and McDonalds sellshamburgers in Moscow. Exxon, a sc-called American company, receives almost 75 percent of itsrevenues from sales outside the United States. Toyota makes cars in Kentucky; General Motors makescars in Brazil; and Ford (which owns part of Mazda) transfers executives from Detroit to Japan to helpMazda manage its operations. These examples illustrate that the world has become a global village. Inturn, managers have to become capable of working with people from different cultures. Globalizationaffects a managers people skills in at least two ways. First, if youre a manager youre increasingly likelyto find yourself in a foreign assignment. Youll be transferred to your employers operating division orsubsidiary in another country. Once there, youll have to manage a work force that is likely to be verydifferent in needs, aspirations, and atlitudes from the ones you were used to back home. Second, even inyour own country, youre going to find yourself working with bosses, peers, and subordinates who wereborn and raised in different cultures. What motivates you may not motivate them.. While your style ofcommunication may be straightforward and open, they may find this style uncomfortable and threatening.

10. This suggests that if youre going to be able to work effectively with these people, youll need tounderstand their ,.OOBin the New* - Work-Force Study Finds Divisions of Race and Gender AreDeep Abroad survey of American workers depicts a work force coworkers. Employees under 25 showno greater prefer- euce than older employees showed a stronger preference for diversity in the work-place Unfortunately, few em- that is deeply divided by race and gender The survey, funded by theFamilies and Work Institute, covered 2,958 wage and salaried workers. One of the surveys moreinteresting findings is that younger workers dont seem any better equipped to cope with a more diversework- [or working with people of other races, ages, or ethnic groups Just over half of stir- veyed workasof all ages said the3fr piefer working with people oithe same. race, sex, gender, and.education. ..Employees, who had greater experIence living or working with people or other ployees have such expert-ence The study found that even workers under 25 had little cont4ct in:the neighbor- hoods wheretheygrew ufr With people of dlfferent.cthic and cultural backgrounds. . . . WeAl Street Juiwnat(SepteTnber 3, 1993), : . , place than their older races, ethnic groups, and ages p. ni. CHAPTER I WHAT IS ORGANIZATIONiJ BEHAVIOR2 . 1 Japans electronic giant Matsushita Electric Company,maker of Panasonic and National brands, operates more than 150 plants in 38 countries throughoutSoutheast Asia, North America, Europe, the Middle East, btin America, and Africa. In managing itsoverseas network of factories that employ 99,000 workers, Matsushib adapts its organizational practicesto each country. At its plants in Malaysia, it accommodates the cultural diFferences of Muslim Malays,ethnic Chinese, and Indian employees by offering Chinese, Malaysian, and Indian food in companycafeterias. It accamrnoiotes Muslim religious customs by providing special prayer rooms at each plantand allowing Iwo prayer sessions per shift. Shown here ore Muslim Moloys during a midday prayerbreak. culture, how it has shaped them, and learn to adapt your management style to these differences. Inthe next chapter, we provide some frameworks for understanding differences between national cultures.Further, as we discuss OB concepts throughout this book, we focus on how cultural differences mightrequire managers to modify their practices. Empowering People If you pick up any popular businessperiodical nowadays, youll read about the reshaping of the relationship between managers and thosetheyre supposedly responsible for managing. Youll lind managers being called coaches, advisers,sponsors, or facilitators.22 In many organizations, employees have become associates. 23 And theres ablurring between the roles of managers and workers, Decision making is being pushed down to theoperating level, where workers are being given the freedom to make choices about schedules, procedures,and solving work-related problems. In the 1980s, managers were encouraged to get their employees toparticipate in work-related decisions.24 Now, managers are going considerably further by allowingemployees full control of their work. Self-managed teams, where workers operate largely without bosses,have become the rage of the 19905.25 Whats going on is that managers are empowering employees.They are putting employees in charge of what they do. And in so doing, managers are having to learn howto give up control and employees are having to learn how to take responsibility for their work and makeappropriate decisions. in later chapters of this book we show how empowernient is changing leadershipstyles, power relationships, the way work is designed, and the way organizations are structured.Stimulating Innovation and Change Whatever happened to W. 1 Grant, Girnbels, and Eastern Airlines?All these giants went hustt Why have other giants like General Motors,Sears, Westinghouse, Boeing, andAT&T implemented huge cost-cutting programs and eliminated thousands of jobs? To avoid going hustempowerment Putting employees in charge of whot they do. 18. PART ONE INTRODUCTIONTodays successful organizations must foster innovation and master the art of change or they will becomecandidates for extinction. Victory will go to those organizations that maintain their flexibi1it continuallyimprove their qualitc and beat their competition to the marketplace with a constant stream of innovativeproducts and services. Dominos single-handedly brought on the demise of thousands of small pizzaparlon whose managers thought they could continue doing what they had b&n doing for years. FoxTelevision has successfully stolen a ma jar portion of the under-25 viewing audience from their muchlarger network rivals through innovative programming like The Sinipsons and Beverly Hills 90210. Anorganizations employees can be the impetus for innovation and change, or they can be a major stumblingblock. The challenge for managers is to stimulate employee creativity and tolerance for change. The fieldof organizational behavior provides a wealth of ideas and techniques to aid in realizing these goals.

11. Coping with Temporariness Managers have always been concerned with change. Whats differentnowadays is the length of time between change implementations. It used to be that managers needed tointroduce major change programs once or twice a decade. Today, change is an ongoing activity for mostmanagers. The concept of continuous improvement, for instance, implies constant change. Managing inthe past could be characterized by long periods of stability, interrupted occasionally by short periods ofchange. Managing today would he more accurately described as long periods of ongoing change,interrupted occasionally by short periods of stability! The world that most managers and employees facetoday is one of permanent temporariness. The actual jobs that workers perform are in a permanent stateof flux. So workers need to cohtinually update their knowledge and skills to perform new jobrequirements.26 For example, production employees at companies like Caterpillar, Chrysler, andReynolds Metals now need to know how to operate computerized production equipment. That was notpart of their lob description 15 years ago. Work groups are also increasingly in a state of flux. In the past,employees were assigned to a specific work group and that assignment was relatively permanent. Therewas a considerable amount of security jn working with the same people day in and day out. Thatpredictablity has been replaced by temporary work groups, teams that include members from differentdepartments and whose members change all the time, and the increased use of employee rotation to fillconstantly changing work assignments. Finally, organizations themselves are in a state of flux. Theycontinually reorganize their various divisions, sell off poor-performing businesses, downsize operations,and replace permanent employees with temporaries.27 Todays managers and employees must learn tocope with temporariness. They have to learn to live with flexibility, spontaneity, and unpredictability.The study of OB can provide important insights into helping you better understand a work world ofcontinual change, how to overcome resistance to changer and how best to create an organizational culturethat thrives on change. Declining Employee Loyally Corporate employees used to believe theiremployers would reward their loyalty and good work with job security, generous benefits, and pay.increases. But CHAPTER I WHAT IS OR3ANJIZAT[QNAL BEHAVICR .19 ....OB in.tk News,...The Flexible Work Force Its one of the fastest growing trends in business today. Were talking about theuse of contingent workerstemporary. subcontracted, parttime, and leased employees.. Just how largethe contingent work force hasgotten is difficult to accurately measure. Conservative estimates, however,put the number at about 25 percent of the labor force. Interestingly, these employees are not just thestereotypical clerks, secretaries, and laborers commonly supplied by temporary-help agencies.Tncreasingly, temporary employees also include technical professionals such as engineers, financialanalyits, doctors, and lawyers. The appeal of temporary employees is obvious. In a rapidly changing anduncertain business envirorirnent, managers want flexibility. Reluctant to add full-time, permanentworkers to their.payrolls, the look to contingent workers as a means of turntrig labor costs from a fixede*pens to a variable expnse. Using contingent;. workers gives an organization the abilitV torespond tochanging market conditions quickly. For instance, by using.cotingnt employees, Apple Computer canquickly adjust its work force as the demand for Macintoshs rise and fall. In addition, temporary workersallows an organization to save on health and vacation benefits, avoid ending up with retirees andpensions, and lessens the chance of legal action because there are fewer regulations that cover contingentemployees. We can expect to see an increased use of contingent workers by employers. It providesorganizatiods with a fluid work force that can be swelled Or deflated like an accordian at a momentsnotice. Critics of this trend, especially unions, argue that contingent workers dont have the benefits,security, and job protection that permanent employees have: And this argument is valid. On the otherhand, proponents note that employers must be able to quickly respond to changing market conditions. Theuse of contingent workers helps meet that goal. Additionally, its often overlooked that the concept ofpermanent jobs with large corporations is a relatively recent phenomenon. At the beginning of thiscentury, half of aLl Americans were self-employed. In essence, whats happening is that were returningto an earlier pattern when employees were free agents, carrying their skills with them from job to job. ThFIexibI Work Force. From Trtht2g (Decenbei 1993), PP. 2330 beginning in the rnid-1980s, inresponse to global competition, unfriendly takeovers, leveraged huyouts, and the Iikc, corporations beganto discard traditional policies on job security, seniority, and compensation. They sought to become leanand mean by closing factories, moving operations to lower cost countries, selling off or closing down

12. less profitable businesses, eliminating entire levels of management, and tepiacing permanent employeeswith temporaries. Importantly, this is not just a North American phenomenon. European companies aredoing the same. Barclays, the big British bank, has recently cut staff levels by 20 percent. And a numberof German firms have trimmed their work force and management ranks. Siemens, the electronicengineering conglomerate, shed more than 3,000 jobs in 1993 alone; steelmaker Knipp-Hoesch has cut itsmanagement hierarchy from five to three levels; and Mercedes-Rcnz has trimmed its number of levelsfrom seven to five 20 PART ONE. INTRODUCTION -____ These changes have resulted in a sharpdecline in empLoyee loyalty.28 In a 1993 survey of workers, for instance, 77 percent said there is lessloyalty between companies and employees than in 1988.2d) Employees perceive that their employers areless committed to them and, as a result, employees respond by being less committed to their companies(see Figure 1-2). Au important OR challenge will be for managers to devise ways to motivate workerswho feel less committed to their employers while maintaining their organizations globalcompetitiveness. Improving Ethical Behavior ethkal dilemma Situations where on individual is requiredto define right and wrong conduct. In an organizational world characterized by cutbacks, expectations ofincreasing worker productivity, and tough competition in the marketplace, its not altogether surprisingthat many employees feel pressured to cut corners, break rules, and engage in other forms of questionablepractices. Members of organizations are increasingly finding themselves facing ethical dilemmas,situations where they are required to define right and wrong conduct.30 For example, should they blowthe whistle if they uncover illegal activities taking place in their company? Should they follow orders theydont personally agree with? Do they give an inflated performance evaluation to an employee they like,knowing that such an evaluation could save that employees job? Do they allow themselves to playpolitics in the organization if it will help their career advancement? What constitutes good ethicalbehavior has never been clearly defined. And in recent years the line differentiating right from wrong hasbecome even more blurred. Employees see people all around them engaging in unethical practiceselected officials indicted for padding their expense accounts or taking bribes; high-powered lawyers, whoknow the rules, are found to be avoiding payment of Social Security taxes for their household help;successful execu CHAPTER 1 WHAT IS ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR? 21 tives who useinsider information for personal financial gain; employees in other companies participating in massivecover-ups of defective military weapons. When caught, they hear these people giving excuses likeEveryone does it, or You have to seize every advantage nowadays, or 1 never thought Id getcaught. Managers and their organizations are responding to this problem from a number of directions)1Theyre writing and distributing codes of ethics to guide employees through ethical dilemmas. Theyreoffering seminars, workshops, and similar training programs to try to improve ethical behaviors. Theyreproviding in-house advisers who can be contacted, in many cases anonymously, for assistance in dealingwith ethical issues. And theyre creating protection mechanisms for employees who reveal internalunethical practices. Todays manager needs to create an ethically healthy climate for his or heremployees, where they can do their work productively and confront a minimal degree of ambiguityregarding what constitutes right and wrong behaviors. We discuss ethics in several places in this bookfor example, as it relates to decision making and politics in organizations. To help you define andestablish your personal ethical standards, youll find ethical dilemma exercises at the conclusion of eachchapter. By confronting ethical issues you might not have thought about before, and sharing your ideaswith classmates, you can gain insights into your own ethical viewpoints, [hose of others, and theimplications of various choices. Contributing Disciplines to the OS fleld Organizational behavior is anapplied behavioral science that is built on contributions from a number of behavioral disciplines. Thepredominant areas are psychology, sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and political science.32As we shall learn, psychologys contributions have been mainly at the individual or micro level ofanalysis; the other four disciplines have contributed to our understanding of macro concepts such asgroup processes and organization. Figure 1-3 overviews the major contributions to the study oforganizational behavior PsycholDgy Psychology is the science that seeks to measure, explain, andsometimes change the behavior of humans and other animals, Psychologists concern themselves withstudying and attempting to understand individual behavior. Those who have contributed and continue toadd to the knowledge of OB are learning theorists, personality theorists, counseling psychologists, and,

13. most important, industrial and organizational psychologists. Early industrial/organizationalpsychologists concerned themselves with problems of fatigue, boredom, and other factors relevant toworking conditions that could impede efficient work performance. More recently, their contribulionshave been expanded to include learning, perception, personality, training, leadership effectiveness, needsand motivational forces, job satisfaction, decision-making processes, performance appraisals, attitudemeasurement, employee selection techniques, job design, and work stress. Behaviorgists have madetheir greatest contribution to 013 through their study of group behavior in organizations, particularlyformal and complex organizations. Some of the areas within 08 that have received valuable input fromsociologists are group dynamics, design of work teams, organizational culture, forma] organization theoryand structure, organizational technolog bureaucracy, communications, power, conflict, and intergroupbehavior. Social Psychology Social psychology is an area within psychology, but blends concepts fromboth psychology and sociology. It focuses on the influence of people on one another. One of the majorareas receiving considerable investigation from social psychologists has been changehow to implementit and how to reduce barriers to its acceptance. Additionally, we find social psychologists makingsignificant contributions in the areas of measuring, understanding, and changing attitudes; communicationpatterns; the ways in which group activities can satisfy individual needs; and group decision-makingprocesses. Anthropology Anthropologists study societies to learn about human beings and theiractivities. Their work on cultures and environments, for instance, has helped us understand differences infundamental values, attitudes, and behavior between people in different countries and within differentorganizations. Much of our current understanding of organizational culture, organizational environments,and differences between national cultures is the result of the work of anthropologists or those using theirmethodologies. Political Science Although frequently overlooked, the contributions of political scientistsare significant to the understanding of behavior in organizations. Political scientists study the behavior ofindividuals and groups within a political environment. Specific topics of concern here include structuringof conflict, allocation of power, and how people manipuldte power for individual self-interest. Twenty-five years ago, little of what political scientists were studying was of interest to students of organizationalbehavior. But times have changed. We have become increasingly aware that organizations are politicalentities; if we MC to be able to accurately explain and predict the behavior of people in organizations, weneed to bring a political perspective to our analysis. There Are Few Absolutes in GB There are fe iiany, simple and universal principles that explain organizational behavior. There are laws in the physicalscienceschemistry, astronomy, physics that are consistent and apply in a wide range of siftations.They allow scientists to generalize about the pull of gravity or to con fidentl send astronauts into space torepair satellites. But as one rid gave all Ihe noted behavioral researcher aptly concluded God gave allthe easy problems to the physicists Human beings are very complex. They are not alike, which limits theability to make simple, accurate, and sweeping generalizations. Two people often act very differently inthe same situation, and the same persons behavior changes in different situations. For instance, noteveryone is motivated by money, and you behave differently at church on Sunday than you did at the beerparty the night before. That doesnt mean, of course, that we cant offer reasonably accurate explanationsof human behavior or make valid predictions. It does mean, however, that OB concepts must reflectsituational or Contingency conditions. We contingency variables can say that x leads to Xi but onlyunder conditions specified in z (the continSituational I&tors; variables that moderate gency variabLes).The science of OB was developed by using general concepts the relationship beiween tie independent andthen altering their application to the particular situation, So, for example, nnd dependent riab1es andimprove the OB scholars would avoid stating that effective leaders should always seek the orrelotIQn.ideas of their subordinates before making a decision. Rather, we find that in some situations aparticipative style is clearly superior, but in other situations, an autocratic decision style is more effective.In other words, the effectiveness of a particular leadership style is contingent on the situation in which itis utilized. As you proceed through this text, youll encounter a wealth of research- based theories abouthow people behave in organizaiJons. But dont expect to find a lot of straightforward causeeffectrelationships. There arent many! Organizational behavior theories mirror the subject matter with whichthey deal. People are complex and complicated, and so too must be the theories developed to explain theiractions. Consistent with the contingency philosophy, youll find pointcounterpoint debates at the

14. conclusion ot each chapter. These debates are included to reinforce the fact that within the OB fie]d thereare many issues over which there is significant disagreement. By directly addressing some of the morecontroversiaJ iS5UCS using the pointcounterpoint tormat, you gel the opportunity to explore differentpoints of view, discover how diverse perspectives complernent and oppose each other, and gain insightinto some of the debates currently taking place within the OB field. So at the end of one chapter. youllfind the argument that leadership plays an important role in an organizations attaining its goals, followedby the argument that there is little evidence to support this claim. Similarly, at the end of other chapters,youll read both sides of the debate on whether money is a rnotivator, clear communication is alwaysdesirable, bureaucracies have become obsolete, and other controversial issues. These arguments are meantto demonstrate that 03, like many disciplines, has disagreements over specific findings, methods, andtheories. Some of the pointcounterpoint arguments are more provocative than others, but each makessome valid points you should find thought provoking. The key is to be able to decipher under whatconditions each argument may be right or wrong. Coming Attractions: Developing an GB Model Weconclude this chapter by presenting a general model that defines the field of OB, stakes out its parameters,and identifies its primacy dependent and independent variables. The end result will be a coming attractionof the topics making up the remainder of this book. An Overview A model is an abstraction of reality; asimplified representation of some real- world phenomenon. A mannequin in a retail store is a model. So,too, is the accountants formula: assets liabilities 4- owners equity. Figure 1-6 presents the skeleton onwhich we will construct our 011 model. It proposes three levels of analysis in OR. As we move from theindividual level to the organization systems level, we add systematically to our understanding of behaviorin organizations. The three basic levels are analogous to building blockseach level is constructed on theprevious level. Group concepts grow out of the foundation laid in the individual section; we overlaystructural constraints on the individual and group in order to arrive at organizational behavior. TheDependent Variables Dependent variables are the key factors you want to explain or predict. what aie theprimary dependent variab]es in OB? Scholars tend to emphasize model productivity, absenteeism,turnover, and job satisfaction. Because of their wide acceptance, we use these four as the criticaldeterminants of an organizations human resources effectiveness. However, there is nothing magicalabout these dependent variables. They merely show that OB research has strongly reflected managerialinterests over those of individuals or of society as a whole. Lets review these terms to ensure weunderstand what they mean and why they have achieved the distinction of being OBs primary dependentvariables. PRODUCTIVITY An organization is productive if it achieves its goals, and does so bytransferring inputs to outputs at the lowest cost. As such, productivity implies a concern for botheffectiveness and efficiency. A hospital, for example, is effective when it successfully meets the needs ofits clientele. It is efficient when it can do this at a low cost. If a hospital manages to achieve higher outputfrom its present staff by reducing the average number of days a patient is confined to a bed or byincreasing the number of staff patient contacts per day, we say the hospital has gained productiveefficiency. A business firm is effective when it attains its sales or market share goals, but its productivityalso depends on achieving these goals efficiently. Measures of such efficiency may include return oninvestment, profit per dollar of sales, and output per hour of labor. We can also look at productivity fromthe perspective of the individual employee. Take the cases of Mike and Al, who ate both long-distancetruckers. If Mike is supposed to haul his fully loaded rig from New York to its destination in Los Angelesin 75 hours or less, he is effective if he makes the 3,000-mile trip within this time period. But measures ofproductivity must take into account the costs incurred in reaching the goal. Thats where efficiency comesin. Lets assume that Mike made the New York to tos Angeles run in 68 hours and averaged 7 miles pergallon. Al, on the other hand, made the trip in 68 hours also, but averaged 9 miles per gallon (rigs andloads are identical). Both Mike and Al were effectivethey accomplished their goalbut Al was moreefficient than Mike because his rig consumed less gas and, therefore, he achieved his goal at a lower cost.In summary, one of Oils major concerns is productivity. We want to know ivhat factors will influencethe effectiveness and efficiency of individuals, of groups, and of the overall organization.ABSENTEEISM The annual cost of absenteeism has been estimated at over $40 billion for U.S.organizations and $12 billion for Canadian firms.34 At the job level, a one-day absence by a clericalworker can cost an employer up to $100 in reduced efficiency and increased supervisory workload,35

15. These figures indicate the importance to an organization of keeping absenteeism low. It is obviouslydifficult for an organization to operate smoothly and to attain its objectives if employees fail to report totheir jobs. The work flow is disrupted, and often important decisions must be delayed. In organizationsthat rely heavily on assembly-line technology, absenteeism can be considerably more than a disruptionit can result in a drastic reduction in quality of output, and, in some cases, it can bring about a completeshutdown of the production facility. But levels of absenteeism beyond the normal range in anyorganization have a direct impact on that organizations effectiveness and efficiency. Are oil absencesbad? Probably not! While most absences impact negatively on the organization, we can conceive ofsituations where the organization may benefit by an employee voluntarily choosing not to come to work.For instance, fatigue or excess stress can significantly decrease an employees productivity, In jobs wherean employee needs to be alertsurgeons and airline pilots are obvious examplesit may well be betterfor the organization if the employee does not report to work rather than show up and perform poorly. Thecost of an accident in such jobs could be prohibitive. Even in managerial lobs, where mistakes are lessspectacular, performance may be improved when managers absent themselves from work rather thanmake a poor decision under stress. But these examples are clearly atypical. For the most part, we canassume that organizations benefit when employee absenteeism is reduced. TURNOVER A high rate ofturnover in an organization means increased recruiting, selection, and training costs. How high are thosecosts? A conservative estimate would be about $15,000 per employee.36 It can also mean a disruption inthe efficient running of an organization when knowledgeable and experienced personnel leave andreplacements must be found and prepared to assume positions of responsibility. All organizations, ofcourse, have some turnover, lithe Tight people are leaving the organizationthe marginal andsubmarginal employeesturnover can be positive. It may create the opportunity to replace anunderperlorming individual with someone with higher skills or motivation, open up increasedopportunities for promotions, and add new and fresh ideas to the organization.37 But turnover oftenmeans the loss of people the organization doesnt want to lose. For instance, one study covering 900employees who had resigned their jobs found that 92 percent earned performance ratings of satisfactoryor better from their superiors.38 So when turnover is excessive, or when it involves valuable performers,it can be a disrtiptive factor, hindering the organizations effectiveness. The final dependent variable wewill look at is lob satisfaction, which we define simply, at this point, as the difference between theamount of rewards workers receive and the amount they believe they should receive. (We expandconsiderably on this definition in Chapter 5.) Unlike the previous three variables, job satisfactionrepresents an attitude rather than a behavior. Why, then, has it become a primary oh saisf action is a topobjective at Birkenstock Foolwear Sancals. When employees wanted the company to become more:nvironmentally conscious, Birkenslock allowed a group of em to spend on hour each week working onenvironmental rojects. These included developing an in-house environmental brary, compiling a guide tonontoxic resources, and organizing ionthly meetings with other businesses to share ideas on conirvationproducts and issues. By giving employees the chance participate in causes they believe in, Birkenstockhas created motivated and loyal work force that rates high on job sofisaction and productivity and low onturnover. turnover Voluntary and involuntary permanent withdrawal from the organization. jobsatisfaction A general atthide toward ones job; the difference between the amount of rewards workersr&eive and the amount they believe they should receive. JOB SATISFACTION dependent variable? Fortwo reasons: its demonstrated relationship to performance factors arid the value preferences held by manyOR researchers. The beliel that satisfied employees are more productive than dissatisfied employees hasbeen a basic tenet among managers for years. While much evidence questions this assumed causalrelationship, it can be argued that advanced societies should he concerned not only with the quantity oflifethat is, concerns such as higher productivity and material acquisitionsbut also with its quality.[hose researchers with strong humanistic values argue that satisfaction is a legitirnatc objective of anorganization. Not only is satisfaction negatively related to absenteeisTn and turnover but, they argue,organizations have a responsibility to provide employees with jobs that are challenging and intrinsicallyrewarding. Therefore, although lob satisfaction represents an attitude rather than a behavior, ORresearchers typically consider it an important dependent variable. The Independent Variables What arethe major determinants of productivity, absenteeism, turnover, and job independent ywiable satisfaction?

16. Cur answer to that question brings us to the independent van Th resuied use l same change in the abjes.Consistent with our belief that organizational behavior can best be under depend&nt rable stood whenvicwe.d essentially as a set of increasingly complex building blocks, the base or first level of our modellies in understanding individual behavior. INUTVIDLJ AL-LEVEL VARIABLES It as been said thatManagers, unlike parents, must work with used, not new, human beingshuman beings whom othershave gotten to first.9 When individuals enter an organization, theyre a hit like used cars. Each isdifferent. Sonic are low mileagethey have been treated carcfufly and have had only limited exposureto the realities of the elements. Others are well worn, having experienced a number of rough roads. Thismetaphor indicates that peop)e enter organizations with certain charactecistics that will influence theirbehavior at work. The more obvious of these are personal or biographical characteristics such as age,gender, and marital status; personality characteristics; values and attitudes; and basic ability levels. Thesecharacteristics are essentially intact when an individual enters the work force, and, for the most part,management can do little to alter them. Yet they have a very real impact on employee behaviot Therefore,each of these factors biographical characteristics, personality, values and attitudes, and abilityarediscussed as independent variables in Chapters 3 and 5. Four other individual-level variables have beenshown to affect employee behavior: perception, individual decision making, learning, and motivation.These topics are introduced and discussed in Chapters 3, 4, 6, and 7. (iRoup-IIEVfl. VARIABLES Thebehavior of people in groups is more than the sum total of each individual acting in his or her own way.The complexity of our model is increased when we acknowledge that peoples behavior when they arc ingroups is different from their behavior when they are alone. Therefore, the next step in the developmentof an understanding of OR is the study of group behavior. Chapter 3 lays the foundation for anunderstanding of the dynamics of group behavior, ibis chapter discusses how individuals in groups atethfiuenced by the patterns of behavior they are expected to exhibit, what the group considers to heacceptable standards of behavior, and the degree to which group members are attracted to each other.Chapter 9 translates our understanding of groups to the design of effective work teams. Chapters 10through 13 demonstrate how communication patterns, leadership styles, power and politics, intergrouprelations, and levels of conflict affect group behavior. - ORGANIZATION SYSTEM-LEVELVARIABLES Organizational behavior reaches its highest level of sophistication when we add formalstructure to our previous knowledge of individual and group behavior. Just as groups are more than thesum of their individual members, so are otganizations more than the sum of their member groups. Thedesign of the formal organization, technology and work processes, and jobs; the organization1s hitmanresource policies and practices (that is. selection processes, training programs, performance appraisalmethods); the internal culture; and levels of work stress all have an impact on the dependent variables.These are disuissed in detail in Chapters 14 through 17. Toward a Contingency PB Model Our finalmodel is shown in Figure 1-7. It shows the four key dependent variables and a large number ofindependent variables, organized by level of analysis, that research indicates have varying impacts on theformer, As complicated as this model is, it still does not do justice to the complexity of the 03 subjectmatter, but it should help explain why the chapters in this book are arranged as they are and help youexplain and predict the behavior of people at work. For the most part, our model does not explicitlyidentify the vast number of contingency variables because of the tremendous complexity that would beinvolved in such a diagram. Rather, throughout this text we introduce important contingency variablesthat will improve the explanatory linkage between the independent and dependent variables in our 013model. Note that weve added the concepts of change and development to Figure 1-7, acknowledging thedynamics of behavior and recognizing that there are ways for change agents or managers to modify manyof the independent variables ii they are having a negative impact on the key dependent variables.Specifically, in Chapter 18 we discuss the change process and techniques for changing employeeattitudes, improving communication processes, modifying organization structures, and the Jike. Alsonote that Figure 17 includes linkages between the three levels of analysis. For instance, organizationstructure is linked to leadership. This is meant to convey that authority and leadership are related.managcment exerts its influence on group behavior through leadership. Simi]arly, communication is themeans by which individuals transmit infoimation; thus, it is the link between individual and groupbehavior. Summary and implications for Managers Managers need to develop their interpersonal or

17. people skills if theyre going to be effective in their job. Organizational behavior (OR) is a field of studythat investigates the impact which individuals, groups, and structure have on behavior withinorganizations, then applies that knowledge to make organizations work more effectively. Specifically, OBfocuses on how to improve productivity, reduce absenteeism and turnover, and increase employee lobsatisfaction. We aH hold a number of generalizations about the behavior of people. While some of thesegeneralizations provide valid insights into human behavior, many are often erroneous. OR usessystematic study to improve behavioral CHAPTER WHAT IS ORGANIzArIONAt BHAY1QR? .31predictions that would be made from intuition alone. But because people are different, we need to look atOR in a contingency framework, using situational variables to moderate cause-effect relationships.Organizational behavior offers a number of challenges and opportunities for managers. It can helpimprove quality and employee productivity by showing managers how to empower their people as wellas design and implement change programs. It offers specific insights to improve a managers peopleskills. OR recognizes differences and helps managers see the value of work force diversity and practicesthat may need to be made when managing in different countries. In times of rapid and ongoing change,OB can help managers learn to cope in a world of temporariness and declining employee loyalty.Finally, OB can offer managers guidance in creating an ethically healthy work climate. For Review 1.Behavior generally is predictable. Do you agree or disagree? Explain. 2. Define organizationalbehavior, i-low does this compare with management? 3. What is an organization? Is the family unit anorganization? Explain. 4. ldentify and contrast the three general management roles. 5, What is TQM?How is it related to OR? 6. In what areas has psychology contributed to OB? Sociology? Socialpsychology? Anthropology? Political science? What other academic disciplines may have contributed toOB? 7. Since behavior is generally predictabte, there is no need to formally study OR. Why is thisstatement wrong? 8. What are the three levels of analysis in our OB model? Are they re lated If so, how?9. If job satisfaction is not a behavior, why is it considered an important dependent variable? 10. Whatare effectiveness and efficiency, and how are they related to organizational behavior? For Discussion 1.Contrast the research comparing effective managers with successful managers. What are the implicationsfrom this research for practicing managers? 2. The best way to view OB is through a contingencyapproach. Build an argument to support this statement. 3. Why do you think the subject of OB might becriticized as being only common sense, when one would rarely hear such a criticism of a course inphysics or statistics? 4. An increasing number of managers are now acknowledging that anunderstanding of OB may be more important than any other business discipline in contdhuting to anorganizations overall success or failure. But few managers were saying this 20 years ago Whatschanged? 5. On a scale of Ito 10 that measures the sophistication of a scientific discipline in predictingphenomena, mathematical physics would probably be a 10. Where do you think OB would fall on thisscale? Why? t.;PP![?iieiI-?lr? VjPd]]I aZJi s1 Point 411;0] The Case for a Structural Explanation ofOrganizational 1 Behavior If you want to really understand the behavior of people at work, you need tofocus on social structure. Why? As one noted scholar put it, The fundamental tact of social life isprecisely that it is socialthat human beings do not live in isolation but associate with other humanbeings. Far too much emphasis. is placed on studying individual characteristics of people. Were notsaying here that values, attitudes, personalities, and similar personal characteristics are irrelevant tounderstanding organizational behavior. Rather, our position is that you gain considerably more insight ifyou look at the structured relationships between individuals in organizations and how these relationshipsconstrain and enable certain actions to occur. Organizations come with a host of formal and informalcontrol mechanisms that, in effect, largely shape, direct, and constrain members behavior. Lets look at afew examples. Almost all organizations have formal documentation that limits and shapes behavior likepolicies,. procedures, rules, job descripuons, and job instructions. This formal documentation setsstandards of acceptable and unacceptable behavior. If you know an organizations major policies andhave a copy of a specific employees job description, you have a major leg up in being able to predict agood deal of that specific employees on-the-job behavior. Almost all organizations differentiate roleshorizontally. By that 1 mean they create unique jobs and departments. Toni is a sales representative forHJ. Heinz, calling on supermarkets. Frank also works for Heinz, but on an assembly line where hemonitors machines that fill pickle relish jars. The structure of these jobs alone alldw me to predict that

18. Toni will have a great deal more autonomy in deciding what she is going to do in her job and how she Isgoing to dolt than Frank does. Organizations also differentiate oles vErtically by creating levels ofmanagement; h so doing, they create boss-subotdinate relationships that tnstrain subordinate behavior. Inour noflwork lives w dont have bosses who can tell us whatto do,. evaluate tAs and even fire us, Butmost of us do at iork And re-. member, bosses evaluate employee performaEcearTd typically control theallocatio&:o rewards. So if I know what behaviors your boss :prthm I can gain insight into whatbehaviors youre more likely to exhibit. . u When you join an organization; youre expected to adapt toits norms of acceptable behavior. These rules dont have to be written down to be powerful andcontrolling.. An organization for instance, may not have a formal dress code but employees are expectedto dress appropriately, which means adapting to the implied dress code norms. Merrill Lynch expectsits brokers to dress appropriately: Men wear coats and ties and women weal, similarly professional attire.Along the same lines, MicrosQfts norms emphasize long Work hours-.-60- to 70-hour workweek5 arenot unusual. These expectations are understood by employees, and employees mcEidify their behavioraccordingly. The point were trying to make here is that you shouldnt forget the organizational part oforganiza. tional behavior. While it doesnt sound very nice, organizations are instruments of. domination.They put people into job boxes that constrain what they can do and individuals witbwhom thcy caninteract. To the degree that employees accept their bosss authority and the limits the organization placeson their role, then they become constraints that limit the behavioral choices of organization members.The concept of an organization is an artificial notion. Organizations have physical properties likebuildings, offices, and equipmwnt, but this tends to gloss over the obvious fact that organizations arereaHy nothing other than aggregates of individuals. As such, organizational actions are just the combinedactions of individuals. In this section, we argue that much of organizational behavior can be viewed as thecollection of efforts by a set of quasi-independent actors. Let me begin by acknowledging thatorganizations place constraints on employee behavior. l1ow ever, in spite of these constraints, every Jobpossesses a degree of discretionareas where rules, I)ron?dures, oh descriptions, supervisory directives,and other formal constraints do not apply. Generally speaking, the higher one moves in the organization,the more discretion he or she has. Lower level lobs lend to he more programmed than middlemanagement obs; and middlemanagers have less discxeLion than do senior managers. But evety jobcomes with some autonomy. And it is this autonomy that allows different people to do different things inthe same job. Casual observation leads all of us to the obvious conclusion that no two people in the sameob behave in exactly the same way. Even in highly prognmmed jobs, like assembly-line work in anautomobile factory or processing claims in an insurance company, employee behavior varies. Why?Individual differences! College student certainly under- stand and act on this reality when they chooseclasses. If three instructors are all teaching Accounting 101 at the same time of day, most students wiltquestion their friends to find out the differences among the instructors. Even though they teach the samecourse as described in the college catalog, the instructors enjoy a onsiderable degree of freedom in howthey meet their course oblectives. Students know this and they try to acquire accurate informa hon thatwill allow then to select among the three. So in spite of the fact that the instructors are teaching the samecourse and the content of that course is explicitly defined in the organizations formal documentation (thecollege catalog), the students (end all the rest of us) know that the behavior of the three instructors willundoubtedly vary widely. People go about doing their lobs in different ways. They differ in theirinteractions with their bosses and coworkers, They vary in terms of work habitspromptness incompleting tasks, conscientiousness in doing quaiity work, cooperation with coworkers, ability to handlestressful situations, and the like. They vary by level of motivation and the degree of effort theyre willingto exert on their job. they vary in terms of the creativity they display in doing their work. And they varyin terms of the importance they place on factors such as security, recognition, advancement, socialsupport, challenging work assignments, and willingness to work overtime. What explains thesevariations? Individual psychological characteristics like values, attitudes. perceptions, motives, andpersonalities. The end result is that, in the quest to understand employee productivity, absenteeism,turnover, and satisfaction, you have to recognize the overwhelming influence that individualpsychological factors play. How Does Your Ethical Behavior Rate?* Below are 15 statements. Identifythe frequency of which you do, have done, or would do these things in the future when employed full

19. time. Place the letter R, 0, 5, or N on the line before each statement. 1. 1 come to work late and getpaid for it. 2. 1 leave work early and get paid for it. 3. 1 take long breaks/lunches and get paid forit. 4. 1 call in sick to get a day off when Im not sick. 5. I use the company phone to makepersonal long-distance calls. 6. I do personal work on company time. - 7. I use the company copierfor personal use. 8. I mail personal things through the company mail. 9. I take home companysupplies or merchandise. 10. I give company supplies or merchandise to friends, or allow friends totake them without saying anything. - 11. I put in for reimbursement for meals, travel, or otherexpenses I did not actually eat or make. 12. 1 use the company car for persona] business. 13. 1 take myspouse/friend out to eat and charge it to the company expense account. 14. I take my spouse/friend onbusiness trips and charge the expense to the company. 15. 1 accept gifts from customers/suppliers inexchange for giving them business. Turn to page A-26 for scoring directions and key. *urce: RN. Lussir,Human Relations in Oranj2athns: A Skill Br;ildthg Approach, 2nd ed. (Homewood. IL: Irwin, 1993), p.297. H::. :. 4) irking With Others Exercise Work Force Diversity Exercise* Purpose To learn about thedifferent needs of a diverse work force. Time Required Approximately 40 minutes. Participants Dividethe class into six groups of approximatey equal and Roles size. Each group is assigned one of thefollowing roles: Nancy is 28 years old. She is a divorced mother of three children, aged 3, 5, and 7. Sheis the department head. Shc CHAPTER I WHAT S ORGANIZATONAt BEHAYIO? 4,35 earns$33,000 a year on her ob arid receives another $3,600 a year in child support From her ex-husband.Ethel is a 72-year-old widow. She works 25 hours a week to supplement her $7,000-a-year pension.Based on her hourly wage of $750, she earns $9,375 a year. John is a 34-year-old black male born inTrinidad, but now a U.S. resident. I-fe is married arid the father of two small children. John attendscollege at night and is within a year of earning his bachelors degree. His salary is $22,000 a year. I-Itswife s an attorney arid earns approximately $40,000 a year. Lii is a 26-year-old physically impairedmale Asian-Amen- can. He is single and has a masters degree in education. Lu is paralyzed andconfined to a wheelchair as a result of an auto accident. I-Ic earns $27,000-a year. Maria is a single 22-year-old 1-lispanic. Born and raised in Mexico, she came to the United States only three months ago.Marias English needs considerable im provement. She earns $17,000 a year. Mike is a 16-year-oldwhite male high school sophomore who works 15 hours a week after school. He earns $6.25 an hour, orapproximately $4,700 a year. The members of each group arc to assume the character consistent withtheir assigned role. Background Our six participants work for a company that has recentiy installed aflexible benefits prograrp. Instead of the.traditional one benefit package fits all, the company isallocating an additional 25 percent of each employees annua] pay to be used for discretionary benefits.Those benefits and their annual cost are as o1lows. Supplementary health care for employee: Plan A Nodeductible and pays 90 percent) = $3,000 Plan B ($200 deductible and pays 80 percent) $2,000 Plan C($1,000 deductible and pays 70 percent) = $500 Supplementary health care for dependents (samedeductibles and percentages as above): Plan A = $2,000 - Plan B $1,500 Plan C $500 Supplementarydental plan = $500 Life insurance: Plan A ($25,000 coverage) $500 Plan B ($50,000 coverage) =$1,000 Plan C ($100,000 coverage) = S2,000 Plafl V ($250;000 coverage) $3,000 Mental health plan$500 Prepaki legal assistance $300 36. PART ONE INTRODUCTION Vacation = 2 percent of annualpay for each, week, up to - 6 weeks a year Pension at retirement equal to approximately 50% of finalannual earnings = $1,500 4-day workweek during the three summer months (available only to full-timeempLoyees) = 4 percent of annual pay Day-care services (after company contribution) $2,000 for all ofan employees children Company-provided transportation to and from work = $750 College tuitionreimbursement 51,000 Language class tuition reimbursement $500 The Task 1. Each group has 15minutes to develop a flexible benefits package that consumes 25 percent (arid no morel) of theircharacters pay. 2. After completing step 1, each group appoints a spokesperson who describes to theentire class the benefits package they have arrived at for their character. 3. The entire class thendiscusses the results. How have the needs, concerns, and problems of each participant inIEIu enced his orher decision? What do these results suggest for trying to motivate a diverse work force? 5pecial thanks toProfessor Penny Wright &n he suggestions during ih developntent of this exercise, Ethical DilemmaEXUECISe Can a Business Firm Be Too Ethical? A couple of years ago, we were competing on agovernment contract, recalls Norman Augustine, CEO of Martin Malietta Corp. The low bid would

20. win. Two days before we were to submit the hid, we got a brown paper bag with our competitors bid init Managers didnt think twice about what they should do. They turned the price sheet over to the U.S.government and informed its competitor about what had happened. Consistent with what management perceived as good ethical practices, the company did not change its hid. And what was the result? MartinMarietta lost the contract, some of its employees lost their lobs, and company stockholders lost money. Isit possible that Martin Mariettas management was too ethical? What happens to a company in a highlycompetitive industry where hardball practices are the norm? If it behaves too nobly, might it consistentlylose out to its more aggressive competitors? Or what about companies that spend heavily to achievesafety or environmental standards that are above what the law mandates? Doesnt that lower companyprofits? One school of thought is that the subject of ethics deals with principiesstandards of right orwrong. So its not possible to be too ethical. How can you have too much principle? While high ethicalstandards mtght hurt a companys performance in the short term, ft will pay dividends over the long haul.CHAPTER 1 WHAT IS ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR? .37 Companies with high principlessuch as Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Hallmark Cards, Delta Airlines, PepsiCodevelop positive pullicimages that result in long-term profits. The counterargurnent is that there can be too much of a goodthing. For example, studies that have sought to link corporate social responsibility and profits have founda curvilinear relationship. Profitability rises as one moves from companies that exhibit little or no socialresponsibility to those that demonstrate a moderate degree. But profitability falls off for the most sociallyresponsible firms. Just as management can spend too much money on advertising, on computers, or onresearch and development, it can also overspend on social responsibility. Control Data Corp. representsan illustration. Control Data built factories in riot-torn inner cities in the late 1960s and 1970s. It hiredminority men and women with little formal education and few qualifications and allowed them to risethrough the ranks and become managers. But the onslaught of Japanese competition in the mid-1980s ledto huge losses. Some argue that Control Datas management dedicated too much of its time and energy,and the companys resources, to doing good. And its traditional business suffered. What do you think?Can a business firm be too ethical? Source: Based on A.W. Singer! 3fl a Colnpdny Be Too Liii ical?Across the &art (Apr11 1993), pp. 1722. - S Rosenbiuth International Travel, Inc. RosenbluthInternational Travel, Inc., isnt like your typical travel agency. First of all, its huge. It employs 3,000people in 582 offices in the United States, England, and Asia. You probably never heard of them because96 per- cent of their business comes from some 1,500 corporate clients like Du Pont, Merck, Chevron,Eastman Kodak, Scott Paper, and General Electric. The company has experienced explosive growth; Intfte late 1970s, it was a locai Philadelphia travel agency with sales of $20 miLlion. Sales in 1992 hit $1.5billion. What explains the companys success? Its president and chief executive ;1 CASE INCIDENT;0]F, C, ),c r i. n.,i .1 I i 1 33 PART ONE INTRODUCTION officer, Hal F. Rosenbiuth, saysits the companys commitment to service achieved by putting its employees ahead of its customer