STILLWATER COUNTY COURTHOUSEALTERNATE 1
Fire
Cab
inet
Conference
Treasurer
Clerk andRecorder
DOR
FinanceDept.
Clerk ofCourts
Justice of Peace
CourtRoom
(1,486 sf)
CommissionersJury Deliberation
DistrictJudge
Bailiff
Sally Port
Jury
LawLibrary
MechanicalRoom
Public Toilets
Meadowlark AssistedLiving Facility
NortonHouse
Sheriff
WitnessProtection
CountyAttorney Probation
AlternativeServices
LEGEND
Circulation
Storage
Common Spaces
Public Spaces
DEPARTMENTS
Court
Treasurer
Dept of Revenue
Commissioners
Clerk & Recorder
Finance
LEGEND
Circulation
Public Space
DEPARTMENTS
Sheriff
County Attorney
Witness Protection
Probation
Alternative Services
NORTON HOUSE
Norton House
ALTERNATE 1:The current plan developed for the Old Hospital will bring all Countyservices into this facility except for the following:
1. Sheriff,2. County Attorney,3. Youth & Adult Probation,4. Alternative Services and5. District Offices (District Courtroom will be relocated to the Old
Hospital)The services all associated with the Sheriff’s department will all remainhoused in the existing County Courthouse. As the cost for leasing theDistrict Court offices is shared equally by three counties, it will remain at thecurrent location. Limited remodeling in the existing County Courthousebuilding will be necessary to accommodate those remaining functions thatwill be concentrated on the first floor eliminating the need for majorremodeling throughout the building.
The planned approach for remodeling the Old Hospital is to completelyremove all interior finishes, including all non-bearing walls, plumbing,electrical and mechanical systems. This approach will allow for newelectrical, mechanical, and plumbing systems to be installed, as well as acode compliant thermal envelope and all new interior finishes. Other thanthe structure itself, the county will essentially have a new building. Exteriorfinishes and reroofing are also anticipated.
The primary advantage of this option is the initial cost, which is significantlyless than any of the other options for consolidating County services. TheOld Hospital is also in close proximity to the existing courthouse.
The primary disadvantage is that some County services and offices will stilloccupy a portion of the existing Courthouse, which has experiencedsignificant differential structural settlement over the years. The Courthouseis a masonry building that is not handicapped compliant, and does notcomply with current building and energy codes or life safety requirements.Any major remodeling in this building that involves multiple floors will triggerthe requirement to bring the entire building up to current building codes.The intent is to renovate the first floor and to block off the upper floors to thepublic; the upper floors will be used for file storage. In addition to thesettling issue, the space utilization in this building is less efficient due to thenumber of interior masonry bearing walls (vaults) which will need to beworked around. The plan is to utilize the first floor only, eliminating the needto bring the upper floors into code compliancy.
STILLWATER COUNTY COURTHOUSEALTERNATE 2
144'-0"
76'-0
"
NortonHouse
New 2-Story Facility(10,944 sf each floor)
New 2-Story Facility(10,944 sf each floor)
LEGEND
Circulation
Existing Building
New Law & Justice Facility
Second Floor Third Floor
ALTERNATE 2:The Courthouse is a very stately government building - the most significant building in the community which should be maintained and utilized. Unfortunately, there is not enough spacein the Courthouse to adequately accommodate the services currently housed there, let alone consolidate the current outlying offices. Additional office space will be required over andabove the existing satellite offices to satisfy the Space Program requirements' current needs.
This Alternate would include a new Law and Justice Center located on the existing Courthouse site. This new building is anticipated to be a two story structure with a stair and elevatortower that serves all floors of the existing Courthouse. This addition is recommended to be located on the north side of the Courthouse and be connected to the existing Courthouse byway of a common circulation core. This option will keep all County services on the same site and provide one point of delivery for County services.
The primary advantage of this option is that it will fully utilize a very substantial and stately public building located in the heart of the community. Although more expensive than otheroptions, a case can be made for investing in this historic structure. Structural stabilization efforts over the years appear to have slowed the differential settlement in recent years. Newstabilization techniques are now available that can further mitigate the differential settlement at lower costs than possible with previously available systems. Further structuralinvestigation will be required to determine the best approach to continued stabilization efforts.
In addition, Life-safety and handicapped accessibility can be more cost efficiently addressed in new construction than in the existing building. The addition can house stairs, elevator,and toilets in a central location convenient to both the new and existing. The courts and Law Enforcement both have very specific space and security requirements, which are bestaccommodated in new construction.
The primary disadvantage to this option is the need for additional structural stabilization. Building Codes will require the addition of a second exit from the upper floors, a handicappedelevator, handicapped toilets, and ADA modifications throughout to make the building handicapped compliant. In addition, the electrical, mechanical, and plumbing systems should becompletely replaced and made compliant with current codes and standards; similar to the approach proposed for the Old Hospital. As the Courthouse is a bearing masonry building, thisdrastically limits the flexibility to relocate interior walls; there will always be under-utilized spaces throughout the building because of the existing masonry bearing walls and the centrallobby on each floor. The Courthouse building is fully occupied, making remodeling more of a challenge for both the contractors and the occupants. This generally equates into moreexpensive and time-consuming construction. Also, parking will continue to be an issue when high visibility court cases are in session.
STILLWATER COUNTY COURTHOUSECOST COMPARISON
Stillwater County Offices
COMPONENT SPACE SUMMARY 8-Jan-15
COMPONENT DETAIL Option No.2 Option No.3 Option No.4 Option No.5
Existing New New NewCourthouse County Law & Law &
Remodel Complex Justice Justice
(No Law & Justice (New Site) (New Site) (Existing Site)
No. Space Description No. Size NSF No. Size NSF NSF NSF NSF NSF
Building Cost:Building Cost (Per Square Foot) 134$ 218$ 268$ 278$ 278$
Building Construction Cost 3,116,726$ 4,774,135$ 10,636,304$ 5,842,031$ 6,066,725$
Additional Project Costs:
Site Acquisition - Land 0 0 550,000$ 550,000$ 0
Site Acquisition - Site Utilities 175,000$ 175,000$
New Construction (At Hospital) 132,000$
Sally port - Secure parking 88,000$
Structural Stabilization (Courthouse) 210,000$
Elevator & Stairs 110,000$
Elevator Lobby Addition 234,000$
Demolition 35,000$ 65,000$
Site Improvements 40,000$ 50,000$ 1,750,000$ 814,000$ 350,000$
Utilities 40,000$ 36,000$ 12,000$
Landscaping 6,000$ 10,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 25,000$
Total Project Cost: 3,417,726$ 5,453,135$ 13,226,304$ 7,492,031$ 6,453,725$
Gross building Square Footage 23,259 21,900 39,688 21,015 21,823
Alternate
No. 1
Total project using existing county
facilities (Option 1 plus Limited
remodeling of 1st floor existing court
house)
Limited Remodeling Exist Courthouse 1,500,000$
(First Floor = 5,698 sf)
Option 1 3,417,726$
Project Costs 723,897$ Contingency (15%) 737,659$
Total 6,379,282$
Square Footage Old Hospital 23,259Square footage First Floor Court house 5,698
Gross Square Footage 28,957
Alternate
No.2
Total project with New Law & Justice
facility on Courthouse Site &
complete courthouse remodel
(Options 2 & 5)
Option 2 5,453,135$
Option 5 6,453,725$
Project Costs 1,633,097$ Contingency (15%) 1,786,029$
Total 15,325,985$
Square Footage Existing Court House 21,900Square footage New Law & Justice 21,823
Gross Square Footage 43,722
Alternate
No.3 Total project with New Law & Justice
center on New Site & complete
courthouse remodel (Options 2 & 4)
Option 2 5,453,135$
Option 4 7,492,031$
Project Costs 1,452,056$ Contingency (15%) 1,941,775$
Total 16,338,996$
Square Footage Existing Court House 21,900SF New Law & Justice (New Site) 21,015
Gross Square Footage 42,914
Alternate
No.4
Total project with complete New
County facilities on New Site (Option
3)
Option 3 13,226,304$
Project Costs 1,496,721$ Contingency (15%) 1,983,946$
Total 16,706,970$ Gross Square Footage 39,688
(Offices & Courts)
NSF
Space Assigned ToJob No.1206
Option No.1
Existing
Old Hospital
Existing Spaces Program Spaces Remodel
Stillwater CountyEstimated Mill Levy Impact AnalysisGeneral Obligation Tax-Exempt Bonds - 20 Year Term
Total Cost of the Project/Mills: Project Estimated
Cost MillsAlternate #4: 17,500,000$ 35.96
The total cost of the project/Mills: 17,500,000$ 35.96
Residential Property:
House Assumed Taxable Estimated Tax Value Value Increase
Per Year
House 1 50,000$ 655$ 23.53$
House 2 75,000$ 982$ 35.30$
House 3 100,000$ 1,309$ 47.07$
House 4 150,000$ 1,964$ 70.60$
House 5 200,000$ 2,618$ 94.14$ House 6 250,000$ 3,273$ 117.67$
All Property:
Property 1 1,000$ 35.96$
Property 2 10,000$ 359.60$
Property 3 100,000$ 3,596.00$
Formula For Calculating Tax Increase:
Millage Taxable Estimated Tax Value Increase
Per Year
Example 0.03596 X 1,367$ = 49.16$ Your Valuation 0.03596 X = -$
Formula = Estimated number of Mills (35.96)/1000 "Taxable Value" =Estimates Tax Impact
* The taxable valuation of your property is located on your Stillwater
County property tax statement in the top portion of the statement
Note: This estimate is based on the bonds being repaid at 4.26%
interest over the life of the bonds (20 years)
Stillwater CountyEstimated Mill Levy Impact AnalysisGeneral Obligation Tax-Exempt Bonds - 20 Year Term
Total Cost of the Project/Mills: Project Estimated
Cost MillsAlternate #2: 15,300,000$ 31.45
The total cost of the project/Mills: 15,300,000$ 31.45
Residential Property:
House Assumed Taxable Estimated Tax Value Value Increase
Per Year
House 1 50,000$ 655$ 20.59$
House 2 75,000$ 982$ 30.88$
House 3 100,000$ 1,309$ 41.17$
House 4 150,000$ 1,964$ 61.76$
House 5 200,000$ 2,618$ 82.35$ House 6 250,000$ 3,273$ 102.94$
All Property:
Property 1 1,000$ 31.45$
Property 2 10,000$ 314.50$
Property 3 100,000$ 3,145.00$
Formula For Calculating Tax Increase:
Millage Taxable Estimated Tax Value Increase
Per Year
Example 0.03145 X 1,367$ = 42.99$ Your Valuation 0.03145 X = -$
Formula = Estimated number of Mills (31.45)/1000 "Taxable Value" =Estimates Tax Impact
* The taxable valuation of your property is located on your Stillwater
County property tax statement in the top portion of the statement
Note: This estimate is based on the bonds being repaid at 4.26%
interest over the life of the bonds (20 years)
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES:These are Preliminary Project costs, based on the current Space Program Requirements. Spectrum Group Architects cannot warrant that anyopinions of probable Project Costs will not vary from actual costs. Spectrum Group Architects has no control over the cost or availability oflabor, equipment, materials, or other market conditions or the Contractor's method of pricing. Spectrum Group Architects makes no warranty,express or implied, that the bids or the negotiated cost of the work will not vary from Spectrum Group Architects' opinion of Project Cost.
Stillwater County Offices
COMPONENT SPACE SUMMARY 8-Jan-15
COMPONENT DETAIL Option No.2 Option No.3 Option No.4 Option No.5
Existing New New NewCourthouse County Law & Law &
Remodel Complex Justice Justice
(No Law & Justice (New Site) (New Site) (Existing Site)
No. Space Description No. Size NSF No. Size NSF NSF NSF NSF NSF
Building Cost:Building Cost (Per Square Foot) 134$ 218$ 268$ 278$ 278$
Building Construction Cost 3,116,726$ 4,774,135$ 10,636,304$ 5,842,031$ 6,066,725$
Additional Project Costs:
Site Acquisition - Land 0 0 550,000$ 550,000$ 0
Site Acquisition - Site Utilities 175,000$ 175,000$
New Construction (At Hospital) 132,000$
Sally port - Secure parking 88,000$
Structural Stabilization (Courthouse) 210,000$
Elevator & Stairs 110,000$
Elevator Lobby Addition 234,000$
Demolition 35,000$ 65,000$
Site Improvements 40,000$ 50,000$ 1,750,000$ 814,000$ 350,000$
Utilities 40,000$ 36,000$ 12,000$
Landscaping 6,000$ 10,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 25,000$
Site Acquisition - Land 550,000$ 550,000$
Site Utilities 175,000$ 175,000$
Total Project Cost: 3,417,726$ 5,453,135$ 13,951,304$ 8,217,031$ 6,453,725$
Gross building Square Footage 23,259 21,900 39,688 21,015 21,823
Alternate
No. 1
Total project using existing county
facilities (Option 1 plus Limited
remodeling of 1st floor existing court
house)
Limited Remodeling Exist Courthouse 1,500,000$
(First Floor = 5,698 sf)
Option 1 3,417,726$
Project Costs 723,897$ Contingency (15%) 737,659$
Total 6,379,282$
Square Footage Old Hospital 23,259Square footage First Floor Court house 5,698
Gross Square Footage 28,957
Alternate
No.2
Total project with New Law & Justice
facility on Courthouse Site &
complete courthouse remodel
(Options 2 & 5)
Option 2 5,453,135$
Option 5 6,453,725$
Project Costs 1,633,097$ Contingency (15%) 1,786,029$
Total 15,325,985$
Square Footage Existing Court House 21,900Square footage New Law & Justice 21,823
Gross Square Footage 43,722
Alternate
No.3 Total project with New Law & Justice
center on New Site & complete
courthouse remodel (Options 2 & 4)
Option 2 5,453,135$
Option 4 8,217,031$
Project Costs 1,452,056$ Contingency (15%) 2,050,525$
Total 17,172,746$
Square Footage Existing Court House 21,900SF New Law & Justice (New Site) 21,015
Gross Square Footage 42,914
Alternate
No.4
Total project with complete New
County facilities on New Site (Option
3)
Option 3 13,951,304$
Project Costs 1,496,721$ Contingency (15%) 2,092,696$
Total 17,540,720$ Gross Square Footage 39,688
(Offices & Courts)
NSF
Space Assigned ToJob No.1206
Option No.1
Existing
Old Hospital
Existing Spaces Program Spaces Remodel
Space Functions
Staff (Includes 'future'
hires next 3 years)
Space Program
Sq. Footage
Parking
Recommended
County Departments
Commissioners 5
Finance 3
Clerk & Recorder 5
Treasurer 5
County Assessor 3
MSU Extension 3
GIS 1
DES 1
Fire Warden 1
Planning 2
Economic Develop 1
Environ Health 2
Superintendent 1
Public Health 7
Facility Manager 1
Sub Total (1) 41 21,900 73
Law & Justice
Sheriff 11
County Attorney 4
District Judge 3
Justice of Peace 3
Clerk of Court 2
Alternatives 1
Adult Probation 2
Youth Probation 1
Victim Witness 2
Sub Total (1) 29 19,802 66
Courtrooms
Spectator Seating - District 130
Spectator Seating - Justice 33
Sub Total (2) 163 2,020 31
Total Employees 70
Total Court Rm Spectators 163
Total Buildinng Square Footage 43,722
Total Parking 170
Stillwater County Parking Requirements based on
City Of Billings Parking Standards:
(1) B-Occupancy (Courthouse)=One (one) Parking space per three hundred (300)
square feet of floor area.
(2) A-Occupancy (Courtroom); 1 Parking space per 65 square feet of floor area, or 1
parking space per one hundred (100) linear inches of gallery seating.
Alternate No. 2
Page 1 of 6
STILLWATER SITE COMPARISONS January 13, 2015
This report considers five (5) options identified by the planning process for
consideration in determining the best long term option for providing additional
county office space for county services. These options are:
1. Remodel “Old Hospital” into County Offices
2. Remodel the Existing Courthouse
3. New County Complex – On a New Site
4. New Law and Justice Center – On a new site
5. New Law and Justice Complex – On the Existing Courthouse Site
This report reviews each option and then looks at the advantages and disadvantages
of each option. Costs relative to each item are contained in an accompanying
spreadsheet.
Option 1: Remodel “Old Hospital” into County Offices
When the Old Hospital became available, the County considered this building as an
economical opportunity to address the County’s shortage of office spaces for county
services and at the same time be able to provide better accessibility for the general
public by consolidating offices into one location. The County currently owns the
building the County Attorney is located in and leases office space for the District
Court offices, in addition to the existing County Courthouse. These outlying offices
are expensive to maintain and operate, in addition to being inconvenient for the
public, as well as county employees. The Old Hospital provides the County an
opportunity to consolidate offices, as well as make public access to County services
more efficient and handicapped accessible. The Planning Department has already
been relocated to the basement of the Old Hospital, eliminating one of the counties
leased office spaces.
The current plan developed for the Old Hospital will bring all County services into
this facility except for the following:
1. Sheriff,
2. County Attorney,
3. Youth & Adult Probation,
4. Alternative Services, and
5. District Court offices (The District Courtroom is planned to be located in the
Old Hospital).
With the exception of the District Court offices, these other services all associated
with the Sheriff’s department will all remain housed in the existing County
Courthouse. As the cost for leasing the District Court offices is shared equally by
three counties, it will remain at the current location. Limited remodeling in the
Page 2 of 6
existing County Courthouse building will be necessary to accommodate those
remaining functions that will be concentrated on the first floor eliminating the need
for major remodeling throughout the building.
The planned approach for remodeling the Old Hospital is to completely remove all
interior finishes, including all non-bearing walls, plumbing, electrical, and
mechanical systems. This approach will allow for new electrical, mechanical, and
plumbing systems to be installed, as well as a code compliant thermal envelope and
all new interior finishes. Other than the structure itself, the county will essentially
have a new building. Exterior finishes and reroofing are also anticipated.
The portion of the building designed for District Court services will require extensive
structural modifications, in order to allow for the larger clear span space required
for a court room; which also requires higher ceilings. A small addition to the Old
Hospital will be necessary to accommodate required auxiliary spaces for District
Court Services:
1. A secure sally port for prisoner transfer,
2. Holding cells to retain individuals during trial, and
3. Judges’ chambers, adjacent to the court room.
The primary advantage of this option is the initial cost, which is significantly less
than any of the other options for consolidating County services. The Old Hospital is
also in close proximity to the existing courthouse.
The primary disadvantage is that some County services and offices will still occupy a
portion of the existing Courthouse, which has experienced significant differential
structural settlement over the years. The Courthouse is a masonry building that is
not handicapped compliant, and does not comply with current building and energy
codes or life safety requirements. Any major remodeling in this building that
involves multiple floors will trigger the requirement to bring the entire building up
to current building codes. The intent is to renovate the first floor and to block off
the upper floors to the public; the upper floors will be used for file storage. In
addition to the settling issue, the space utilization in this building is less efficient due
to the number of interior masonry bearing walls (vaults) which will need to be
worked around. The plan is to utilize the first floor only, eliminating the need to
bring the upper floors into code compliancy.
This Option will also require the renovation of the first floor of the courthouse to
accommodate the functions listed above that are to remain in the courthouse.
Page 3 of 6
Option 2: Remodel the Existing Courthouse
Remodeling and renovating the existing Courthouse has been the subject of much
conversation over time, which in the end has always resulted in the same conclusion
– a significant amount of work will be required to stabilize the differential structural
movement and to bring the building into handicapped and building code compliance
before doing anything to improve the functionality of the offices housed in the
Courthouse.
Additionally, there is not enough space in the Courthouse to adequately
accommodate the services currently housed there, let alone consolidate the current
outlying offices. Additional office space will be required over and above the existing
satellite offices to satisfy the space program requirements current needs. If this
option is selected additional county office space will be required somewhere in the
community.
The Courthouse is a very stately government building – the most significant building
in the community that should be maintained and utilized. A major remodeling of
the entire building will be less expensive on a square foot basis than a partial
remodeling (all things being equal) because of how the two remodeling projects
would be approached – complete demolition of interior finishes and systems vs. a
piecemeal approach.
The primary advantage of this option is that it will fully utilize a very substantial and
stately public building located in the heart of the community. Although more
expensive that other options a case can be made for investing in this historic
structure. Structural stabilization efforts over the years appear to have slowed the
differential settlement in recent years. New stabilization techniques are now
available that can further mitigate the differential settlement at lower costs than
possible with previously available systems. Further structural investigation will be
required to determine the best approach to continued stabilization efforts.
The primary disadvantage to this option is the need for additional structural
stabilization. Building Codes will require the addition of a second exit from the
upper floors, a handicapped elevator, handicapped toilets, and ADA modifications
throughout to make the building handicapped compliant will also be required. In
addition, the electrical, mechanical, and plumbing systems should be completely
replaced and made compliant with current codes and standards; similar to the
approach proposed for the Old Hospital. As the Courthouse is a bearing masonry
building, this drastically limits the flexibility to relocate interior walls; there will
always be under-utilized spaces throughout the building because of the existing
masonry bearing walls and the central lobby on each floor. This building is fully
occupied, making remodeling more of a challenge for both the contractors and the
Page 4 of 6
occupants, which generally equates into more expensive and time-consuming
construction. It should also be noted that more space is required than is available in
this building and additional construction will be required somewhere.
Option 3: New County Complex – On a New Site
This option is included in order to understand the costs of a complete new County
facility, and to be able to compare its costs to other options being considered. The
assumption is that remodeling is less expensive than new construction; however at
some point new construction makes more sense especially when considering all
associated costs over the life of the building.
The County services contained in a new facility are identified in the space program,
and is anticipated to be organized in two separate wings – a wing for Law and
Justice and a wing for all other County services.
Site requirements for this option are to identify a new site close or adjacent to the
town boundaries where city utilities will be available. The site also needs good
accessibility from the freeway for law enforcement. For long range planning
purposes, the site needs to be large enough to accommodate future growth. This
being said, a site of 6 – 8 acres should be planned and budgeted for as a minimum;
10 acres is preferred.
The primary advantage is that the County will have all new facilities, built to current
building code requirements including energy standards and handicapped
requirements. The life cycle costing of this option will be the least cost of all the
options. Life cycle costing is an important factor to consider, and it often outweighs
the higher first costs as compared to other options.
The primary disadvantage is that this option will have the highest initial cost and will
require the acquisition of a new site with higher site development costs than
utilizing an existing previously developed site within the city limits.
If this option is selected the existing courthouse will have to be repurposed;
associated costs for repurposing have not been considered in this comparison.
Option #4: New Law and Justice Center – on a new site
In order to provide the necessary space for all essential County services, this option
explores developing a stand-alone Law and Justice Center on a new site. This facility
will house District Court and all ancillary services associated with District Court
including Judges’ chambers, Justice Court and chambers, Clerk of Court(s), County
Page 5 of 6
Attorney’s office and the Sheriff’s Department. Also contained in this facility will be
offices for Victim/Witness Protection, Youth Probation and Adult Probation.
Site requirements discussed under Option #3 are considered to be the same for this
option (6 – 8 acres). For long range planning purposes, the site needs to be large
enough to accommodate future growth, which should include eventually moving all
County services to this site.
The primary advantage of this option is that it allows the spaces and departments
with the most specific space requirements to be housed in new construction.
The primary disadvantage is the added cost of purchasing and developing a new site
along with the need to remodel existing facilities (Courthouse or old hospital) to
properly house remaining County services.
Option #4 needs to be combined with Options #1 or #2 to provide the necessary
office space the county currently needs.
Option #5: New Law and Justice Complex – On the Existing Courthouse Site
This option will house all the same services as the previous option, except for offices
and services related to: Victim/Witness Protection, Youth Probation, Alternatives,
and Adult Probation that will be housed in the existing (adjacent) County
Courthouse.
A new Law and Justice Center located on the existing Courthouse site is anticipated
to be a two story structure with a stair and elevator tower that serves all floors of
the existing courthouse. This addition can be located on the north or west side of
the Courthouse and be connected to the existing Courthouse by way of a common
circulation core. This option will keep all County services on the same site and
provide one point of delivery for County services.
The primary advantage is that life-safety and handicapped accessibility can be more
cost efficiently addressed in new construction than in the existing building. The
addition can house stairs, elevator, and toilets in a central location convenient to
both the new and existing. The courts and Law enforcement both have very specific
space and security requirements that are best accommodated in new construction.
The primary disadvantage is the existing Courthouse is experiencing differential
structural movement previously discussed that will need to be resolved. Also,
parking will continue to be an issue when high visibility court cases are in session.
Page 6 of 6
Summary The five (5) Options listed above can be summarized into four (4) Alternates, as only
Option #3 (New County Complex on new Site) completely addresses the Space
Program requirements, by itself, and without any other Options necessary to meet
those requirements.
Alternate #1: Remodel Old Hospital (Option #1) plus Limited Remodeling of 1st Floor
Existing Courthouse.
Alternate #2: Complete existing Courthouse Remodel (Option #2) plus New Law &
Justice Facility on existing site (Option #5)
Alternate #3: Complete existing Courthouse Remodel (Option #2) plus New Law &
Justice Facility on new site (Option #4)
Alternate #4: Complete New County Facilities on new site (Option #3)