+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Strategic

Strategic

Date post: 25-Oct-2014
Category:
Upload: ngo-cong-truong
View: 13 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
26
THE CORE COMPETENCE OF THE CORPORATION C.K. Prahalad and Gary Hamel Group 7: Nguyen Thị Thu Trang. Van Thi Yen Nhi.
Transcript
Page 1: Strategic

THE CORE COMPETENCE OF THE CORPORATION

C.K. Prahalad and Gary Hamel

Group 7:Nguyen Thị Thu Trang.Van Thi Yen Nhi.

Page 2: Strategic

OVERVIEW

2. THE ROOTS OF COMPETITIVENESS.

1. THE COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES OF CORPORATION.

3. IDENTIFYING CORE COMPETENCIES.

4. LOSING CORE COMPETENCIES.

5. FROM CORE COMPETENCIES TO CORE PRODUCTS.

6. THE SBU – CORE COMPETENCE.

7. STRATEGIC ARCHITECTURE.

8. EXPLOITTING COMPETENCIES.

Page 3: Strategic

1. THE COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES OF CORPORATION

Best-Cost provider strategy

The Five Generic Competitive Strategies

Page 4: Strategic

1. THE COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES OF CORPORATION

The Competitive Strategies of NEC & GTE

NEC Adopted an appropriate “strategic architecture”.Be enormous opportunities that built the competencies needed to serve all three markets: computing, communication & components business. Determined the most important “core product” – semiconductors.Aimed at building competencies rapidly and at low cost.

GTE Be required to compete in technology industry and communicated widely.

Senior executives and continued that managing independent business units.

Decentralization made it difficult to focus on core competencies.

Page 5: Strategic

2. THE ROOTS OF COMPETITIVENESS.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 128 9 10

Business 1

Business 2

Business 3

Business 4

Core Product 2

Core Product 1

Competence 1

Competence 2

Competence 3

Competence 4

End products

Page 6: Strategic

2. THE ROOTS OF COMPETITIVENESS.

Page 7: Strategic

3. IDENTIFYING CORE COMPETENCIES.

3 tests to identify core competencies.

Page 8: Strategic

4. LOSING CORE COMPETENCIES.

First, the costs of losing a core competence can be only partly calculated in advance

Second, since core competencies are built through a process of continuous improvement

and Enhancement that span for longtime.

Page 9: Strategic

From Core Competencies to Core Products

What is core competence?

It fulfills three key criteria:

•It is not easy for competitors to imitate.

•It can be re-used widely for many products and markets.

•It must contribute to the end consumer's experienced benefits.

Page 10: Strategic

What are core products?

•Core products are a company's products which are most directly related to their core competence.

•Core products are central to the company's performance and make the most money that sustain the business.

From Core Competencies to Core Products

Page 11: Strategic

From Core Competencies to Core Products:

The tangible link between identified core competencies and end products is what we call the core products

From Core Competencies to Core Products

Page 12: Strategic

From Core Competencies to Core Products

(Source : The Core Competence of the Corporation by C.K. Prahalad and Gary Hamel – Harvard Business Review – May-June 1990)

Page 13: Strategic

The brand share only in end product markets

The manufacturing share in any core product

To maintain the market = To maximize the company’sleadership manufacturing share in core

products

From Core Competencies to Core Products

Page 14: Strategic

What are their Core Competencies and Core Products?

From Core Competencies to Core Products

Page 15: Strategic

• What is SBU?

Strategic Business Unit (SBU) is a profit center which focuses on product offering and market segment. It have:

- Discrete marketing plan- Discrete analysis of competition- Discrete marketing campaign

The Tyranny of the SBU

Page 16: Strategic

The Tyranny of the SBU

Focus on rivals in the market

Stress on business units’ performance

Allocate a lot of money to advertise brand name

Decentralize commanding by each business

The Tyranny of the SBU

Page 17: Strategic

The Tyranny of the SBU

(Source : The Core Competence of the Corporation by C.K. Prahalad and Gary Hamel – Harvard Business Review – May-June 1990)

Page 18: Strategic

The disadvantages to corporation from the SBU’s distortion

SBU’s distortion

Underinvestment in DevelopingCore Competencies & Core Products

Bounded InnovationIm

pris

oned

Res

ourc

es

Page 19: Strategic

Developing Strategic Architecture

• A strategic architecture is a road map of the future that identifies which core competencies to build and their constituent technologies.

• They are different for every company

• The architecture provides a logic for product and market diversification

Page 20: Strategic

Developing Strategic Architecture

• The strategic architecture should make resource allocation priorities transparent to the entire organization.

• It provides a template for allocation decisions by top management

• It helps lower level managers understand the logic of allocation priorities and disciplines senior management to maintain consistency.

Page 21: Strategic

Developing Strategic Architecture

A tool for communicating with customers and other external relative units.

Page 22: Strategic

• The Origin of VickersA division of Trinova Corporation

• The Elements of TransformationTechnologiesCustomer Needs

• The New Concept’s Goals•Development of the Capability of Competition•Certainty of the present market in the future•The new market preemption

Page 23: Strategic

Developing Strategic Architecture

Page 24: Strategic

Redeploying to Exploit Competencies

Page 25: Strategic

THANK YOU!

Page 26: Strategic

Q&A


Recommended