Strategies for managing the weed seedbank and encouraging
weed seed predation
Adam DavisUSDA-ARS Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit
Urbana, IL
Artwork: Cherie Earle
weed seedbank
Artwork: Steve Deming
1. How prevalent is weed seed return?2. Does it matter?3. What can we do about it?
1990 1993 1996 1999 200201990 1993 1996 1999 20020
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000AMARECHEALGRASSOTHER
Time (yr)Seed
pop
ulat
ion
dens
ity (s
eeds
m-2
)
CONV
d.ORG
Survey: weed seeds at harvest time
16 fields (8 corn, 8 sb)30 samples/field
1. undispersed, standing
2. on soil surface
3. in soil seedbank
4. caught by combine
26 species totalDavis 2008
combin
e soil
standi
ngsur
face
Seed pool
1
10
100
1000
10000
giant foxtail
See
ds m
-2
combin
e soil
standi
ngsur
face
Seed pool
0
0
0
redroot pigweed
combin
e soil
standi
ngsur
face
Seed pool
velvetleaf
Weed seedbank is persistentYears required for X % reduction in seed number
50%– Common lambsquarters 12– Velvetleaf 8– Common chickweed 3– Smartweed 4– Redroot pigweed 4– Common ragweed 2.5– Crabgrass, giant foxtail < 1– Kochia < 1
Weed seedbank is persistentYears required for X % reduction in seed number
50% 99%– Common lambsquarters 12 78– Velvetleaf 8 56– Common chickweed 3 18– Smartweed 4 30– Redroot pigweed 4 26– Common ragweed 2.5 10– Crabgrass, giant foxtail < 1 6– Kochia < 1 6
velvetleaf
0 5 10 15 200
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80_
ScottsbluffLincoln
LOCATION
Burnside et al. 1996
Seed
ger
min
atio
n (%
)
Burial time (yr)
redroot pigweed
0 5 10 15 200
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
ScottsbluffLincoln
LOCATION
Burnside et al. 1996
Seed
ger
min
atio
n (%
)
Burial time (yr)
Why should we manage theweed seedbank?
Demographic sub-model
Economic submodel
controlcost
lost croprevenue
seeds smallseedlings
matureplants
ss(1-g)
f*spred
g scult
shand
largeseedlings
Liebman and Davis (2009)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Lower level parameter x
Cos
t ($/
ha) i
n 5t
h yr
Physical control efficacyHandweeding efficacySeedbank declineSeed predation
= base value in model
= realistic parameter range
Liebman and Davis (2009)
Hand weeding intra-row weeds:
200-500 hours per hectare in carrot and direct sown onion and leek
DIAS
Melander and Rasmussen, 2001
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 50 100 150 200 250
Intra-row weed number (m-2)
Tim
e ha
nd-w
eedi
ng (h
ha
-1)
DIAS
Relationship between weed density and time consumption for hand
weeding
Melander and Rasmussen, 2001
Davis and Williams. 2007. Weed Sci. 55:502-507
Do seed escapes matter?
Fec
Pop
Y
CE
MERec0.64
-0.41
0.62Fec
Pop
Y
CE
MERec0.64
-0.41
0.62
2005
Fec
Pop
Y
CE
MERec0.77
-0.40
0.30Fec
Pop
Y
CE
MERec0.77
-0.40
0.30
2006
Wild proso millet fecundity in sweet corn had effects on following snap bean crop.
Davis and Williams. 2007. Weed Sci. 55:502-507
Yes.
Ecological management of weed seedbanks
biological
cultural
physical
intact decayedChee-Sanford et al. (2006)
Biological: I. Seed survival in soil seedbank
-4 -2 0 2 40
20
40
60
80
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 40
20
40
60
80
-4 -2 0 2 40-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
Fungal 18S principal component 1
Wee
d se
ed m
orta
lity
(%)
y = 40.4 - 3.3xR2=0.27, P<0.05
y = 49.3 - 3.3xR2=0.29, P<0.05
velvetleafgiant foxtail
Davis et al. (2006)
organic 3-yr rotation
conventional 3-yr rotation
conventional 4-yr rotation
reduced input 4-yr rotation
old field
Davis et al. 2008. Weed Sci. 56:676-684
Photo: Adam Davis
Biological: II. Seed predation
Common predators of weed seeds…. We need moreof these in our cropping systems!
0102030405060708090
100
9-Aug 29-Aug 18-Sep 8-Oct
Seed recovery date
Dai
ly %
see
d re
mov
al
Wheat Wheat + red clover
* * * ** NS
Davis et al. (2003)
Annual rate of seedpredation in field crops
Urbana, IL2004-2008
Weed seed predation over time(giant foxtail)
0 100 200 300DAYS_ELAPSED
0
20
40
60
80
100
% S
eed
loss
to p
reda
tion
wheat/red clsoybeancorn
CROP_05
Weed seed predation over time(giant ragweed)
0 100 200 300DAYS_ELAPSED
0
20
40
60
80
100
% S
eed
loss
to p
reda
tion
wheat/red clsoybeancorn
CROP_05
after Heggenstaller et al. (2006)
spring wintersummer autumn
?
corn, soybean
small grain + legume
alfalfa
Can we maintain high seed predation rates throughout year by diversifying crops?
See
d pr
edat
ion
(%)
0
100
50
Day of Year
P(s
eed
pred
atio
n) 0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
++
=
Lundgren et al. 2007
beetle banks
Cultural: I. Cover crops and mulches
Williams et al. 2008
crop yield loss:
weed seeds:
Cultural: II. Weed suppressive crop cultivars
Cultural: III. Crop population and spatial arrangement
Schreiber 1992
Cultural: IV. Crop rotation and diversification
Physical: I. Improved intrarow control efficacy to reduce hand-weeding costs
Band-steaming reducedintra-row weeds in sugar beet
Melander & Jørgensen 2005
More physical and thermal tools: intrarow
Photo: Adam Davis
Physical: II. Tillage as one-time rescue for massive seed input
Percentage of seeds at depth
Dep
th (i
nche
s)
moldboard plow
0
468
10
2
rototiller
0
468
10
2
disk
0
468
10
2
chisel plow
0
468
10
2
no-till
0
46810
2
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percentage of seeds at depth
Dep
th (i
nche
s)
moldboard plow
0
468
10
2
rototiller
0
468
10
2
disk
0
468
10
2
chisel plow
0
468
10
2
no-till
0
46810
2
Percentage of seeds at depth
Dep
th (i
nche
s)
moldboard plow
0
468
10
20
468
10
2
rototiller
0
468
10
20
468
10
2
disk
0
468
10
20
468
10
2
chisel plow
0
468
10
20
468
10
2
no-till
0
46810
20
46810
2
0 20 40 60 80 1000 20 40 60 80 100
Mohler (2001)
Physical: III. Stale seedbed
Physicalweeding.com
Physical: IV. Weed seed collection at harvest
BibliographyDavis, A. S., K. A. Renner, C. Sprague, L. Dyer and D. Mutch. 2005. Integrated weed
management...One year's seeding. Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E-2931. Pp. 112.
Hartzler, R. G. and D. D. Buhler. 1998. Weed seeds and the seedbank: implications for management. Iowa State University. IPM-48. Pp. 1-6.
Menalled, F., J. Dauer, T. Fox and K. Renner. 2001. Managing your farm to increase weed seed predation. Michigan State University. E-2749. Pp. 1-6.
Menalled, F. D., M. Liebman and K. Renner. 2006. The ecology of weed seed predation in herbaceous crop systems. ed. Pp. 297-327
H. P. Singh, D. R. Batish and R. K. Kohli .) Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
*Scientific literature mentioned in presentation available upon request (contact Adam Davis: [email protected] ) or John Masiunas: [email protected] )