+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Streamgage Datum Conversion

Streamgage Datum Conversion

Date post: 31-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: calvin-holcomb
View: 26 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Streamgage Datum Conversion. Eastern Region Height Modernization Consortium Webinar March 4, 2014 Jim Kolva, USGS, Office of Surface Water. Topics for Discussion. Problem from USGS Water perspective Database Facts How Height Modernization might help the conversion effort?. Problem. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
20
Streamgage Datum Streamgage Datum Conversion Conversion Eastern Region Height Eastern Region Height Modernization Consortium Modernization Consortium Webinar Webinar March 4, 2014 March 4, 2014 Jim Kolva, USGS, Office Jim Kolva, USGS, Office of Surface Water of Surface Water
Transcript
Page 1: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Streamgage Streamgage Datum Datum

ConversionConversionEastern Region Height Eastern Region Height Modernization Consortium Modernization Consortium

WebinarWebinar

March 4, 2014March 4, 2014

Jim Kolva, USGS, Office of Jim Kolva, USGS, Office of Surface WaterSurface Water

Page 2: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Topics for DiscussionTopics for Discussion

Problem from USGS Water Problem from USGS Water perspectiveperspective

Database FactsDatabase Facts How Height Modernization might help How Height Modernization might help

the conversion effort?the conversion effort?

Page 3: Streamgage Datum Conversion

ProblemProblem

Most USGS streamgages have a Most USGS streamgages have a datum surveyed or estimated to datum surveyed or estimated to NGVD29. NGVD29.

Streamgages established since Streamgages established since 2002 and surveyed using a Global 2002 and surveyed using a Global Positioning System (GPS) should Positioning System (GPS) should have datum set to NAVD88.have datum set to NAVD88.

Page 4: Streamgage Datum Conversion

ProblemProblem

Page 5: Streamgage Datum Conversion

ProblemProblem

Page 6: Streamgage Datum Conversion

ProblemProblem

Page 7: Streamgage Datum Conversion

ProblemProblem Mixing vertical Datums creates Mixing vertical Datums creates

confusion;confusion; This mixture of Altitude Datums has This mixture of Altitude Datums has

created a confusing situation for created a confusing situation for streamgage information users streamgage information users attempting to model flood plain attempting to model flood plain inundation, establish flood profiles or inundation, establish flood profiles or use other hydrologic applications.use other hydrologic applications.

In some areas of the country, the In some areas of the country, the difference between NGVD29 and difference between NGVD29 and NAVD88 can be over NAVD88 can be over 4 feet4 feet..

Page 8: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Partner Applications of Partner Applications of Information – NWS AHPSInformation – NWS AHPS

Page 9: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Partner Applications of Partner Applications of Information – NWS AHPSInformation – NWS AHPS

Page 10: Streamgage Datum Conversion

USGS/NWS/FEMA Flood USGS/NWS/FEMA Flood Inundation InitiativesInundation Initiatives

Page 11: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Policy Guidance from Policy Guidance from USGSUSGS

NAVD88 is the recommended NAVD88 is the recommended datum established in the Federal datum established in the Federal Geographic Data framework Geographic Data framework (Office of Water Information (Office of Water Information Technical memorandum Technical memorandum 2002.01).2002.01).

Page 12: Streamgage Datum Conversion

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Alabam

a

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Florida

Georgia

Haw

aii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New

_Jersey

New

_Mexico

New

_York

North_C

arolina

North_D

akota

Ohio

Oklahom

a

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Puerto_R

ico

South_C

arolina

South_D

akota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Virginia

Washington

West_V

irginia

Wisconsin

Wyom

ing

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

Califo

rnia

Colorado

Florida

Georgia

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New_Jersey

New_York

North

_Carolina

North

_Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Puerto

_Rico

South_Carolina

Texas

Utah

Virginia

Washington

West_Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

NAVDNAVDof 1988of 1988

NGVDNGVDof 1929of 1929

SW Station Datums in the USGS NWISSW Station Datums in the USGS NWIS

>48,200 SW stations

>2,200 SW stations

Page 13: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Database factsDatabase facts

84,944 Surface-Water sites84,944 Surface-Water sites 62,032 determined elevation from Maps62,032 determined elevation from Maps 7,737 from Levels7,737 from Levels 8,023 unknown source8,023 unknown source 1,269 from a GPS1,269 from a GPS

4,771 already reported to 4,771 already reported to NAVD88NAVD88

Page 14: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Database factsDatabase facts

84,944 Surface-Water sites84,944 Surface-Water sites 62,032 determined elevation from Maps62,032 determined elevation from Maps Convert these to NAVD88 directly Convert these to NAVD88 directly

because within existing accuracy because within existing accuracy limitations unless a determination of limitations unless a determination of need for more accuracy due to data use.need for more accuracy due to data use.

Page 15: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Database factsDatabase facts

125 sites in NGS database 125 sites in NGS database (NGSIDB)for NAVD88 have a “gage” (NGSIDB)for NAVD88 have a “gage” description. description. Assumed to be USGS streamgagesAssumed to be USGS streamgages Additional sites may be present but did Additional sites may be present but did

not show up in the searchnot show up in the search Approximately 17,000 sites need to Approximately 17,000 sites need to

have some analysis and conversion.have some analysis and conversion.

Page 16: Streamgage Datum Conversion

NGS assistance in GPS NGS assistance in GPS surveyssurveys

NGS is doing updating work and NGS is doing updating work and GPS surveys throughout the countryGPS surveys throughout the country North Carolina and Michigan -- Will North Carolina and Michigan -- Will

survey in at least one reference mark at survey in at least one reference mark at active gages in work areasactive gages in work areas

Working on best ways to easily provide Working on best ways to easily provide reference mark descriptions and gage reference mark descriptions and gage locations to contractors doing this work locations to contractors doing this work and best way to report back to USGS.and best way to report back to USGS.

Page 17: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Priority stationsPriority stations

USGS, NGS, USACE and NWS developing USGS, NGS, USACE and NWS developing priority lists of gages for conversionpriority lists of gages for conversion Pilot study in MissouriPilot study in Missouri

MO has been working with Darrell Pratte, MO has been working with Darrell Pratte, NGS Geodetic Coordinator with the Missouri NGS Geodetic Coordinator with the Missouri DNR. Darrell has volunteered to serve in a DNR. Darrell has volunteered to serve in a role of oversight for field surveys and provide role of oversight for field surveys and provide some personnel.some personnel.

Plan was developed for conversion of gages in Plan was developed for conversion of gages in Missouri. Includes survey plans for those Missouri. Includes survey plans for those stations identified as needing that level of stations identified as needing that level of attention. attention.

Page 18: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Funding SourcesFunding Sources

Unfunded mandate to USGS Water Unfunded mandate to USGS Water Science CentersScience Centers

Some will need GPS surveys to meet Some will need GPS surveys to meet required accuracies or because of required accuracies or because of instability issues.instability issues.

Can the Eastern Region Height Mod Can the Eastern Region Height Mod partner with the USGS efforts?partner with the USGS efforts?

Page 19: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Issues to be resolvedIssues to be resolved

Accuracy of the conversion.Accuracy of the conversion. ResourcesResources

Time and manpowerTime and manpower MoneyMoney

Data already converted to Data already converted to elevation in database – Florida elevation in database – Florida effortsefforts

Page 20: Streamgage Datum Conversion

Questions and Questions and Comments??Comments??


Recommended