+ All Categories
Home > Documents > STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This...

STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This...

Date post: 12-Aug-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
31
Building Livable Communities with Transit Chicago 2006 STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for the Buck
Transcript
Page 1: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Chicago 2006

STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for

the Buck

Page 2: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Chicago 2006

Streetcar Panelists

David Taylor, HDR TampaGB Arrington, PB Portland

Ed Crawford, HARTLine TampaKeith Jones, CATA Little RockEthan Melone, City Of Seattle

John Carroll, Carroll Investments Portland

Page 3: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Streetcar Systemsin Operation

Streetcar Systemsin Planning, Design or Construction

Page 4: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

The Streetcar GoalConnecting People Shaping Places

Page 5: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Connecting and Shaping

• Pedestrians - The First Class Passenger• True Urban Circulation - Short-trips • Destinations and Activity Centers Linked• Redevelopment is Enhanced• Retail and Active Uses are Reinforced• Public/Private Investment is Maximized • “Places Where People Want to Be” are

Created

Page 6: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

The Successful Streetcar District • A Definable Boundary• An Appropriate Set of “Attractors and

Producers” – Diverse Use Mix• Opportunity Areas for Redevelopment or

Joint Development• A High Quality Pedestrian Environment• Route Visibility and Identity• Multiple Modes and Connectivity• Coordinated Public/Private Efforts

Page 7: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

The Streetcar District

Page 8: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Portland

Page 9: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Portland Streetcar Development

$2.4B in Private Investment Since 2001

Page 10: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Streetcar Core Center Edge

Page 11: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Streetcar Effect: Twice the Intensity

• Source: Portland Streetcar, Inc/ E.D. Hovee & Company

Page 12: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Pearl District Projects

Page 13: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

South Waterfront: Portland’s Next Big Thing

Page 14: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Tacoma

Page 15: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Tacoma

Page 16: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Seattle Streetcar

Page 17: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Seattle Streetcar

Page 18: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Seattle Streetcar

• Attract biotech and other jobs

• Create a new waterfront park

• Encourage housing development

• Build a streetcar

• Build infrastructure to promote housing and job development

• Encourage sustainable development

Mayor Greg Nickels’ South Lake Union Action Agenda

Page 19: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Seattle Streetcar

Page 20: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Little Rock’s River Rail

Page 21: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Little Rock’s River Rail

Page 22: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Little Rock’s River Rail

Page 23: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Little Rock’s River Rail

Page 24: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Chicago 2006

TECO Line Streetcar - Tampa

Development is Booming

Placemaking Development

Tourism.

Page 25: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

TECO Line Streetcar - Tampa

Opposite sides of Channelside Dr.

Page 26: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

TECO Line Streetcar - TampaNew Embassy Suites Opens December 2006

Eentrancefaces the streetcar station instead of the street

Page 27: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

TECO Line Streetcar - Tampa

Page 28: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

TECO Line Streetcar - Tampa

Page 29: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

TECO Line Streetcar - Tampa

Page 30: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Return on InvestmentCity Year Miles Cost* $ Inv** ROILittle Rock 2004 2.5 19.60 1.2b 6122%Tacoma 2003 1.6 88.75 0.9b 1014%Tampa 2003 2.3 56.00 1.0b 1785%Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212%

* This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and in Tampa's case, land acquisition.

** This represents planned and existing development investments directly related to the lines. Numbers were through interviews in Little Rock, a development study in Portland, and calculations of new planned development located three blocks or less from the streetcar in Tacoma and Tampa.

Page 31: STREETCARS: Getting the Most BANG for · 2012. 6. 27. · Portland 2001 4.8 54.60 2.3b 4212% * This represents the total costs of the project including maintenance facilities and

Building Livable Communities with Transit

Creating Excitement and Value


Recommended