STRENGTHENING KEE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTIONS TO
ACHIEVE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH A
MULTISTAKEHOLDER APPROACH AND
STRENGTHENING BASELINE DATA OF HIGH BIODIVERSITY
OUTSIDE CONSERVATION AREAS
Grant Final Report
Perkumpulan Aliansi Relawan untuk Penyelamatan Alam (ARuPA)
Date of Report: April 23, 2021
DISCLAIMER :
This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States
Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this (specify) are the sole
responsibility of Perkumpulan ARuPA and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the
United States Government
i
STRENGTHENING KEE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTIONS TO ACHIEVE
MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH A MULTISTAKEHOLDER
APPROACH AND STRENGTHENING BASELINE DATA OF HIGH
BIODIVERSITY OUTSIDE CONSERVATION AREAS
Grant Final Report
Perkumpulan Aliansi Relawan untuk Penyelamatan Alam (ARuPA)
Grant agreement No. TT1.2-GRA-C3-8
Grant Period of Performance: May 01, 2020 – April 30, 2021
Date of Report: April 23, 2021
This publication was prepared by Perkumpulan ARuPA for Chemonics International for activities
completed under Contract No. AID-497-TO-16-00002
ii
CONTENTS
ABBREVIATION ...................................................................................................................... iii
Section I – Technical .................................................................................................................. 1
A. Summary of Grant Activity Goals and Objectives .......................................................... 1
B. Summary of Grant Activity Achievements ...................................................................... 3
C. Description of Any Activities/Milestones Not Completed .......................................... 27
D. Lessons Learned and Recommendations ...................................................................... 27
E. Grant Success Stories .................................................................................................... 28
F. Product/documents resulted from grants activities ...................................................... 29
Section II - Financial ................................................................................................................. 30
A. Description of grant activity funding ............................................................................. 30
B. Summary of Grant Activity Costs and Payments .......................................................... 30
C. Explanation of higher or lower than anticipated costs ................................................. 31
iii
ABBREVIATION
Acronym Definition
APBD Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah
APBDes Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Desa
ARuPA Aliansi Relawan untuk Penyelamatan Alam
BBKSDA Balai Besar Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam
BBL Bening Bening Lobster
BIJAK Bangun Indonesia untuk Jaga Alam demi Keberlanjutan
BPBD Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah
BPEE Bina Pengelolaan Ekosistem Esensial
BTNAP Balai Taman Nasional Alas Purwo
BUMDes Badan Usaha Milik Desa
BTS Batas
CDK Cabang Dinas Kehutanan
CSO Civil Society Organization
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
DD Dana Desa
DID Dana Insentif Daerah
DISHUT Dinas Kehutanan
F Female
FGD Focus Group Discussion
GPS Global Positioning System
KEE Kawasan Ekosistem Esensial
KEE MK Pulau Masakambing
KEE TP Teluk Pangpang
KEE TK Pantai Taman Kili Kili
KEE UP Mangrove Ujungpangkah
KSDAE Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam dan Ekosistem
M Male
MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forestry
MPA Marine Protection Area
OPD Organisasi Perangkat Daerah
Si Merak Ati Sistem Informasi Manajemen Area dan Keanekaragaman Hayati
Jawa Timur.
SKW Seksi Konservasi Wilayah
SMCA Spatial Multi Criteria Analysis
R & D Research and Development
TAHUJA Tata Hubungan Kerja
TCA Transmission Channel Analysis
ToT Training of Trainer
USAID United States Agency for International Development
1
Section I – Technical
A. Summary of Grant Activity Goals and Objectives
Since ARuPA was awarded the grant in May 2020, ARuPA has collaborated with the East Java Office
for Natural Resources Conservation (BBKSDA) and East Java Forestry Service (Dinas Kehutanan), to
implement a pilot activity to improve the effectiveness of the management of essential ecosystem
areas (KEE) at the site level. The piloting focused on strengthening the institutional design of the KEE
managers and the KEE management plans at KEE Teluk Pangpang, Banyuwangi. Teluk Pangpang is a
coastal area with mangrove forests with an area of + 1,663.71 hectares. Teluk Pangpang has been
designated as a KEE on July 27, 2020, through the East Java Governor Decree No. 188/338 / KPTS /
013/2020. The focus/objectives of the piloting activities in Banyuwangi is to:
▪ Assessing the need for strengthening the effectiveness of KEE management;
▪ Strengthen the multi-stakeholder forum for KEE management based on the results of
stakeholder mapping;
▪ Update the KEE area arrangement map
▪ Update KEE management documents.
After three months of piloting, the new approach taken by AruPA at the KEE Teluk Pangpang has
been approved by East Java BBKSDA and Forestry Service. The new approach focused on strengthen
and provide more intensive stakeholder collaboration, clarify roles and functions among forum
members on KEE management, and serve as a foundation to achieve the effectiveness on KEE
management. Based on this approach, East Java BBKSDA and East JavaForestry Service need to
replicate good practices from KEE Teluk Pangpang to three additional locations. Due to the success
of the KEE pilot in Teluk Pangpang, the project will expand the pilot activities to strengthen the
effectiveness of KEE management in three additional KEE locations, which are (l) KEE Mangrove
Ujung Pangkah in Gresik, (2) KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili in Trenggalek, and (3) KEE Pulau
Masakambing in Sumenep.
The objective of this grant was to improve the effectiveness of KEE management at the field level by
promoting a multistakeholder management approach. The grant activity was implemented by
working with stakeholders to strengthen KEE management institutions, strengthen the KEE
management documents according to effectiveness measurements, conduct analysis of KEE
management financing options from local government agencies and stakeholders, and determine the
roles and responsibilities, and working relationship between involved stakeholders. The selected
pilot locations were in KEE Teluk Pangpang in Banyuwangi, KEE Ujung Pangkah in Gresik, KEE Pantai
Taman Kili-kili in Trenggalek and KEE Masakambing in Sumenep. The grant also worked to
strengthen the process of identification and verification (inver) of high biodiversity areas outside
conservation areas in East Java. The biodiversity inventory will strengthen the achievement of the
East Java Province target to identify and verify 225.000 hectares of high biodiversity areas.
The main objectives of this project were:
1. Assess the need for strengthening the institution of the KEE multi-stakeholder forum
2. Strengthening the institutional functions to achieve the effectiveness of KEE management.
3. Increasing the capacity of forum members and community groups in managing KEE
4. Implementing the inventory of high biodiversity areas outside the conservation area
5. Sharing knowledge on the effectiveness of KEE management
To achieve these objectives, ARuPa carried out several activities:
Phase I May-Nov 2020
Location: KEE Teluk Pangpang Banyuwangi
2
Activities:
1. Consolidation meeting with BPEE
2. Consolidation and socialization program
3. Research - Stakeholder study of KEE Teluk Pangpang
4. Multi-stakeholder workshop to present results of stakeholder mapping and KEE
management gap analysis
5. Training of KEE management through a multi-stakeholder approach and dissemination of
KEE regulations and conceptions to the stakeholders
6. Writing workshop to integrate institutional strengthening options for the KEE management
forum members into the draft KEE decree
7. Stakeholder workshop to present the proposed revised KEE decree
8. Technical meetings to develop a work plan to map and verify the KEE area
9. Mapping and field verification on KEE management area
10. Producing an updated map of the KEE management area
11. Collecting data and identify opportunities to improve ecosystem function, maximize wildlife
protection, and contribute to community livelihoods
12. Social Assessment for the community around KEE Teluk Pangpang
Phase II Dec 2020 – Apr 2021
Location:
▪ KEE Teluk Pangpang Banyuwangi
▪ KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah Gresik
▪ KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili Trenggalek
▪ KEE Pulau Masakambing Sumenep
Activities:
1. Preparation for Pilot Activities
1.1. Internal preparation meeting for the program implementation team
2. Assess the need for strengthening the institution of the KEE multi-stakeholder
forum
2.1. Workshop on planning and drafting research designs
2.2. Stakeholders mapping studies for 3 KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah (UP), Pulau Masakambing
(MK), Pantai Taman Kili Kili (TK) area
2.2.1. Desk research
2.2.2. Field data collecting for Stakeholders mapping studies
2.2.3. Data analysis and report writing of stakeholders mapping results
2.3. Policy and fiscal incentive opportunity studies in local government for KEE UP, MK, TK
management
2.3.1. Desk research
2.3.2. Field data collecting in Policy and fiscal incentive opportunity studies
2.3.3. Data analysis and report writing in policy and fiscal incentive opportunity studies
2.4. Biodiversity inventory in KEE UP, MK, TK
2.4.1. Desk research
2.4.2. Field data collection Biodiversity inventory in KEE
2.4.3. Data analysis and report writing in KEE biodiversity potential.
2.5. Data analysis and report writing in socio-economic assessment in KEE
2.5.1. Desk research
2.5.2. Field data collection in Socio-Economic Assessment in KEE
2.5.3. Data analysis and report writing in socio-economic assessment in KEE
3. Strengthening the institutional functions to achieve the effectiveness of KEE
management
3.1. KEE management document development of KEE Teluk Pangpang (TP)
3
3.1.1. Development of KEE Telung Pangpang management document
3.1.2. Stakeholders consultation of KEE Teluk Pangpang management document
3.2. KEE area arrangement of KEE UP, MK, TK
3.2.1. Field mapping & verification of KEE UP
3.2.2. Field mapping & verification of KEE MK
3.2.3. Field mapping & verification of KEE TK
3.3. Development map of area arrangement/blocking of 3 KEE area
3.4. Consolidation meeting of KEE forum for strengthening of KEE institutional and management
document
3.4.1. Consolidation meeting of KEE TP Forum phase 1 & 2
3.4.2. Consolidation meeting of KEE UP Forum phase 1 & 2
3.4.3. Consolidation meeting of KEE MK Forum phase 1 & 2
3.4.4. Consolidation meeting of KEE TK Forum phase 1 & 2
3.4.5. Writing workshop for finalizing institutional and management document of KEE UP,
MK, TK, TP phase 1 & 2
4. Increasing the capacity of forum members and community groups in managing
4.1. Strengthening the utilization of KEE to support village potential-based KEE management
objectives
4.1.1. Silvofishery training
4.1.2. Ecotourism development training in the KEE area
4.1.3. Writing workshop and assistance for drafting the ecotourism business plans of KEE TP
4.1.4. Writing workshop and assistance for drafting the ecotourism business plans of KEE UP
4.1.5. Writing workshop and assistance for drafting the ecotourism business plans of KEE
MK
4.1.6. Writing workshop and assistance for drafting the ecotourism business plans of KEE TK
5. Implementing the inventory of high biodiversity areas outside the conservation area
5.1. Development of Biodiversity Information System in East Java Province
5.2. Development module for biodiversity inventory training
5.3. Training of trainer (ToT) for biodiversity inventory team
5.4. Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis (SMCA) for developing the indicative map of high biodiversity
area
5.5. The collection of repository secondary data
5.6. Field data collection for high biodiversity 17 locations in the East Java
5.7. Data consolidation of ground check results and secondary spatial data
5.8. High biodiversity map finalization and writing report of high biodiversity inventory
B. Summary of Grant Activity Achievements
Overall, ARuPA has achieved all the targets that have been determined in the planning. Here is a
summary of the achievements and detail of activities during the project:
B.1 Summary of Achievements
No Indicator name Target Actual
Note
(to describe the achievements or justification of not achieved
target)
The number of studies
that were conducted on
the need to strengthen
KEE management in the
targeted area.
4 4 • Executive summary and report of stakeholders
mapping
• Executive summary and report of policy and fiscal
incentive opportunity studies
• Executive summary and report of KEE biodiversity
potential
4
No Indicator name Target Actual
Note
(to describe the achievements or justification of not achieved
target)
• Executive summary and report of socio-economic
assessment in KEE
ARuPA has handed over the study reports to beneficiaries
on April 20, 2021, in Aston Hotel Surabaya. The
beneficieries are:
• KEE Teluk Pangpang Forum
• KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah Forum
• KEE Pulau Masakambing Forum
• KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili Forum
• The East Java BBKSDA
• The East Java Forestry Service
• BPEE
The number of
institutions that have
received data,
information, or tools
related to biodiversity
protection and/or
sustainable landscape
developed by ARuPA
through USAID BIJAK
support,
8 11 ARuPA has handed over the study reports to beneficiaries
on April 20, 2021, in Aston Hotel Surabaya. The
beneficieries are:
• BPEE, the Directorate of Management of Essential
Ecosystem, Indonesian Ministry of Environment and
Forestry;
• DISHUT Jawa Timur, East Java Provincial Forestry
Service;
• BBKSDA Jawa Timur, the East Java Agency for
Conservation of Natural Resources;
• Manager representative of KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili
Trenggalek (KEE TK)
• Manager representative of KEE Teluk Pangpang
Banyuwangi (KEE TP)
• Manager representative of KEE Mangrove
Ujungpangkah Gresik (KEE UP)
• Manager representative of KEE Pulau Masakambing
Sumenep (KEE MK)
• District Government of Trenggalek
• District Government of Banyuwnagi
• District Government of Gresik
• District Government of Sumenep
The number of KEE
forums and action plans
established or
strengthened as the
result of USAID BIJAK
assistance.
4 4 • Forum and action plan of KEE TK
• Forum and action plan of KEE TP
• Forum and action plan of KEE UP
• Forum and action plan of KEE MK
The project developed these documents to strengthen
the management effectiveness of each four KEEs namely:
• Institutional documents include The East Java
Governor Decree of the KEE area and Forum of KEE
Manager; roles and relations procedure of members
of KEE forum.
• Action plan document 2021-2025
• Protection plan document 2021
KEE Forum on four sites, East Java BBKSDA and Forestry
Service have expressed gratitude that the existence of
these documents have helped them manage the KEE
areas.
The number of maps or
indicative maps of KEE
developed/ enhanced by
ARuPA as the result of
USAID BIJAK support.
3 & 17 3 & 17 Four maps of KEE areas as follows:
▪ Management block map of KEE TK
▪ Management block map of KEE TP
▪ Management block map of KEE UP
▪ Management block map of KEE MK
5
No Indicator name Target Actual
Note
(to describe the achievements or justification of not achieved
target)
The management block map of KEEs will be used for each
forum as a guideline to implement the action plan and
protection plan documents.
17 maps of high biodiversity areas on 21 districts, which
are Tuban, Madiun-Kediri, Trenggalek, Gunung Kelud,
Malang-Kota Batu, Surabaya-Gresik, Sidoarjo, Sampang,
Pasuruan, Lumajang, Dataran Tinggi Hyang, Probolinggo,
Jember, Situbondo, Ijen Baluran, Banyuwangi Utara, and
Banyuwangi Selatan.
These 17 maps of high biodiversity areas will be used by
the East Java Forestry Service; East Java BBKSDA and the
government of each district for:
• biodiversity data center for conservation program
planning
• data-based decision making
• provision of a biodiversity profile for district
environmental services
• monitoring the circulation of protected and wild
animals
• projection of proposals and designation of new KEE,
and
• calculation of natural resources balance
The number of people
trained in sustainable
landscapes supported by
USG assistance:
a. Silvofishery
b. Tourism
development
c. Tourism business
d. ToT biodiversity
inventory
a. 36
b. 38
c. 36
d. 20
a. 38
b. 38
c. 147
d. 20
▪ 38 persons consist of 2 female and 36 male were
trained in silvofishery. Most of the participants'
knowledge level about silvofishery have increased.
Before the training, 31.25 percent did not
understand silvofishery compared to 3.13 percent
after the training. The number of participants who
became very familiar with the concept of
silvofishery/cultivation of mangrove connected ponds
increased from 37.5 percent to 71.88 percent.
▪ 38 persons consist of 7 females and 31 males have
been trained in ecotourism development. Through a
trainer, the community understood the concept and
basics of ecotourism management, specifically in the
KEE context. The achievement is indicated by the
post-test result as below:
o Low level in the pre-test was 10 persons, and
the post-test is 2 persons.
o Medium level in the pre-test was 12 persons,
and the post-test is 11 persons.
o High level in the pre-test was 4 persons, and
the post-test is 13 persons.
▪ 147 persons consist of 36 female and 111 male trained
in ecotourism business plan, with the detail:
o KEE TK: 41 persons (11F; 30M) o KEE TP: 55 persons (11F; 40M)
o KEE UP: 24 persons (8F; 16M)
o KEE MK: 27 persons (6 F; 21M)
▪ 20 persons consist of 3 females and 17 males who
were trained in the training of trainer biodiversity
inventory. Most of the participants' knowledge levels
increased. These were indicated by pre and post-test
results and discussion processes during training. Pre
and post-test result showed that:
o Low level in the pre-test was 7 persons, and
the post-test is 2 persons.
o Middle level in the pre-test was 14 persons, and
the post-test is 9 persons.
o High level in the pre-test was 6 persons, and
the post-test is 16 persons.
6
No Indicator name Target Actual
Note
(to describe the achievements or justification of not achieved
target)
The number of
biodiversity information
system developed by
ARuPA through USAID
BIJAK support.
1 1 There is already a web-based information system. Please
check it: https://inver-kehati-jatim.karogis.com
The website is fully operational and has officially been
handed over to the East Java Forestry Service on 20 April
2021 at Hotel Aston Surabaya. The East Java Forestry
Service will manage this website as the East Java
biodiversity information system after the close-out of this
project. Until the date of this report, ARuPA is still in
coordination with the East Java information and
communication officer to obtain the definitive website
address before the end of May 2021.
The number of news
featuring sustainable
landscapes or
conservation messages
of BIJAK or BIJAK
partners that are
covered in the media
5 38 38 media coverage. Follow the link below to read the
individual news clippings:
Media Coverage
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jnHcMXbh8Bko41
qYVJEY9iBUTtDhLSfu
Overall, four KEEs were covered in the news by online
media. The news were dominated by KEE Mangrove
Ujungpangkah Gresik and KEE Taman Kili Kili Trenggalek.
The district governments of these KEEs were active in
sharing with the local journalists about the sites. The
media has covered KEE Teluk Pangpang a year ago during
phase 1. The media rarely writes about KEE Masakambing
because of its remote location.
Among others, the news covered topics about the
existing KEEs, the establishment of the KEE Forums, the
uniqueness of the landscapes, flora, and fauna in each of
the KEE areas, the support from the district government
towards this project.
7
B.2 Summary of Activities
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
PHASE I (MAY – NOV 2020)
1.1 Consolidation meeting with BPEE
Advice from the director of BPEE to USAID BIJAK & ARuPA on the project plan to be implemented. The Director of BPEE advised the
project implement to capture existing conditions in the field at KEE
Teluk Pangpang Banyuwangi to get actual baseline data for the project
and maximize the involvement of the right parties during the project. In
response, USAID BIJAK and ARuPA conducted a stakeholder mapping
to capture the parties who are already and supposedly involved in the
KEE Forum in Banyuwangi. ARuPA had also maximized the involvement
of the parties in every project activity and always coordinate with BPEE,
East Java BBKSDA, and Forestry Service.
4 beneficiaries: BPEE, BBKSDA of
East Java, Forestry
Service of East Java,
and ARuPA
9 14 23 Jun 4, 2020 Virtual Meeting
1.2 Consolidation and
socialization program
Agreement on the project activity plan developed by BPEE, East Java
BBKSDA and Forestry Service, and ARuPA. The result of this meeting is
as follow:
o BPEE, USAID BIJAK ARuPA, East Java BBKSDA, Forestry Service,
and all participants agree on strengthening the effectiveness of KEE
Teluk Pangpang management.
o The parties who attended the consolidation and socialization
activities were committed to supporting this joint activity matrix.
This activity matrix consisted of activities from USAID BIJAK
ARuPA, East Java BBKSDA, and Forestry Service.
o The activity matrix was socialized in a stakeholder meeting in
Banyuwangi in September 2020, held by Bappeda Banyuwangi.
4 beneficiaries:
BPEE, BBKSDA of
East Java, Forestry
Service of East Java,
and ARuPA
11 28 39 Aug 19,
2020
Virtual
Meeting
1.3 Research - Stakeholder study
of KEE Teluk Pangpang
Draft report on the KEE Teluk Pangpang stakeholders study developed.
One important finding was that village institution has the greatest level
of interest towards the KEE compared to other actors. However, in
contrast, the level of influence of the village is very low. The
recommendation is to empower the village institution. In another
finding, there is a knowledge and perception gap from several
stakeholders related to the definition, function, and management of KEE
areas. The recommendation is the need to consolidate and coordinate
among stakeholders.
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
Teluk Pangpang
1 1 2 Jun 2 – Jul
30, 2021
Yogyakarta
Banyuwangi
1.4 Multi-stakeholder workshop
to present results of
stakeholder mapping and KEE
management gap analysis
Final report on the KEE Teluk Pangpang stakeholders’ study developed
based on inputs at the stakeholder workshop. The important inputs
were: the need to align work programs and budgets from various
parties to focus on the activities of the Teluk Pangpang KEE
management forum. In this sense, the Banyuwangi Bappeda office has
the authority to consolidate all of OPD (District Apparatus
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
Teluk Pangpang
2 28 30 Sep 9, 2020 Banyuwangi
8
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
Organizations) to focus on KEE management. Another input: village
institution has the potential as the implementing management of KEE
Teluk Pangpang. The Village Law provides villages as very strategic
institutions and village institutions have the authority to consolidate
various institutional community groups in the village. So, all of the
programs from several OPD should be organized by the village at the
field implementation.
2.1 Training of KEE management
through a multi-stakeholder
approach and dissemination of
KEE regulations and
conceptions to the
stakeholders
Stakeholders’ understanding and awareness in KEE Teluk Pangpang
improved related to KEE management. The results are as follow:
o Training participants have increased understanding of the KEE
regulations, multistakeholder management approach, and gender
mainstreaming. Results of the pre-post test showed increased
understanding among participants by 20 to 30 percent.
o Participants agree to arrange an action plan document of KEE Teluk
Pangpang and hold a public consultation.
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
Teluk Pangpang
7 18 25 Nov10 – 12,
2021
Yogyakarta
2.2 Writing workshop to
integrate institutional
strengthening options for the
KEE management forum
members into the draft KEE
decree
Draft SK Forum and the role of forum members arranged. The draft
East Java Governor decree states that the forum structure is made out
of 3 divisions: protection, utilization, planning, and research and
development. Another important point stakeholders agree on was the
village institution, as a forum member, represents all the community
groups in the KEE area.
A legal opinion needs to be developed to accompany the draft SK
Forum before it is submitted to the provincial government,
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
Teluk Pangpang
3 7 10 Sep10, 2020 Banyuwangi
2.3 Stakeholder workshop to
present the proposed revised
KEE decree
Proposed draft KEE Forum decree completed. At the workshop,
participants agreed to add an obligation for the Teluk Pangpang KEE
forum to develop an action plan and protection plan document. The
meeting mandated the East Java Forestry Service to submit the draft
forum decree to the East Java provincial government legal bureau.
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
Teluk Pangpang
5 25 30 Oct 7, 2020 Banyuwangi
3.1 Technical meetings to develop
a work plan to map and verifiy
the KEE area
Mapping team for KEE areas and work plans established. The team
members consist of:
o Chairman: Januar (Perhutani KPH Banyuwangi Selatan)
o Team members: 3 persons from Kedungringin village, 3 persons
from Kedunggebang village, 3 persons from Kedungasri village, 3
persons from Wringinputih village, Bappeda (1 persons), Balai TNAP
(3 person), Perhutani (6 person), BPEE (1 person), CDK Banyuwangi
(2 person), SKW V Banyuwangi (1 person), BBKSDA Jatim (1
person).
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
Teluk Pangpang
2 11 13 Oct 8, 2020 Banyuwangi
9
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
The team has agreed to use the SMCA map as a baseline map during
field verification and block mapping in KEE areas.
3.2 Mapping and field verification
on KEE management area
KEE area boundary field coordinates and spatial data to determine the
KEE map areas are obtained. o There are 34 KEE boundary area GPS points recorded in the field.
o The border pal or markers have been installed. They measure L 12
cm x W 12 cm x H 100 cm and marked “BTS KEE”
o In the field, the team has identified land control, land use, and land
cover of the KEE area, and identified various flora and fauna,
mostly bangau tong tong (Leptoptilos javanicus).
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE Teluk Pangpang
1 31 32 Oct 15 – 16,
2020
Banyuwangi
3.3 Producing an updated map of the KEE management area
Map of KEE Teluk Pangpang management area. ARuPA produced blocking map of the KEE area that is used in the management of the
action plan document.
27 beneficiaries of stakeholder in KEE
Teluk Pangpang
0 1 1 Oct17 – 30, 2020
Yogyakarta
4.1 Collecting data and identify
opportunities to improve
ecosystem function, maximize
wildlife protection, and
contribute to community livelihoods
Assesment report of the KEE Biodiversity’s potential completed. We
found 10 mangrove species, with Tanjang Clengkreng (Rhizophora
apiculata) as the dominant species; 12 bird species and 1 deer (Rusa
timorensis), identified that more than 51 percent of the area are dense
vegetation. We defined 3 grades or blocks namely low (red), middle (yellow), and high (green). Each grade/block have recommendation such
rehabilitation activity in the low block need to increased.
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
Teluk Pangpang
1 7 8 Sep11 – 15,
2020
Banyuwangi
4.2 Social Assessment for
community around KEE Teluk
Pangpang
Assessment report of KEE Teluk Pangpang’s social aspect competed.
The social assessment used Transmission Channel Analysis (TCA)
approach to capture social problems, potentials, and arrange
transformation on them. Based on this assessment, we recommended that among OPD, Perhutani, BTNAP, Village Government, and
community, they need to build consensus to detail the KEE’s
management plan. Because the existing condition showed that there are
gaps in knowledge and perception of land use towards KEEs.
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
Teluk Pangpang
2 13 15 Oct9-14,
2021
Banyuwangi
PHASE II (DEC 2020 – APR 2021)
1 Preparation for Pilot Activities
1.1 Internal preparation meeting
for the program
implementation team
Seventeen ARuPA program staff have improved understanding about
the program, their duties & responsibilities; Detail of activity plan
developed. Most of ARuPA’s program staff had a 2-year experience with
stakeholder engagement, biodiversity conservation, and community
development. We had arranged scopes of works and 4-month working
plans for each staff.
17 program staff of
ARuPA
3 15 18 Dec 18,
2020
Yogyakarta
2 Assess the need for strengthening the institution of KEE multi-stakeholder forum
2.1 Workshop on planning and
drafting research designs
Four research design of stakeholder mapping, fiscal opportunities,
biodiversity and socio-economic on KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah (UP),
Pulau Masakambing (MK), Pantai Taman Kili Kili (TK)
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
25 13 38 Dec 26-27,
2020
Yogyakarta
10
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
2.2 Stakeholders mapping studies for 3 KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah (UP), Pulau Masakambing (MK), Pantai Taman Kili Kili (TK) area
2.2.1 Desk research Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) stakeholders list, interest, and
authority of stakeholders were collected based on literature.
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
4 0 4 Jan 2-5, 2021 Yogyakarta
2.2.2 Field data collecting for
Stakeholders mapping
studies
Three field finding packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the stakeholders’
perception of the KEE initiative were collected, based on interviews and
FGD at 3 KEE sites.
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
4 0 4 UP: Jan9 to
Feb9, 2021.
MK:
7,8,11,13,
and 19 Jan
2021
TK: Jan5 to
9, 2021
Gresik,
Sumenep,
Trenggalek
2.2.3 Data analysis and report
writing of stakeholders
mapping results
Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the stakeholders’ mapping
reports in three KEE completed. The studies found two important
things as follows: (1). Some parties have high interest but low power. In
contrast, some parties have low interest but high power. Balance among
the parties needs to be developed; (2). There were gap perceptions
among parties related to how KEE areas should be managed.
The main recommendation from this studies is efforts are needed to
create collaborative governance that is closer to ideal without
forgetting several dimensions that characterize the capacity of this
collaboration, including bonds of trust, mutual understanding,
commitment, the common ground, and the presence of actors who
become a connector (the bridging actors).
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
4 0 4 Feb10-25,
2021
Yogyakarta
2.3 Policy and fiscal incentive opportunity studies in local government for KEE UP, MK, TK management
2.3.1 Desk research Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) secondary data of national/local
fiscal incentive policy were collected.
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
2 2 4 Jan 2-5, 2021 Yogyakarta
2.3.2 Field data collecting in
Policy and fiscal
incentive opportunity
studies
Three field finding packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the development and
budgeting documents from districts, sub-districts, and village
governments were collected.
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
2 2 4 UP: Jan8 to
Feb9, 2021
MK: 7, 19,
26 Jan 2021
TK: Jan8 to
Feb9, 2021
Gresik,
Sumenep,
Trenggalek
2.3.3 Data analysis and report
writing in policy and
fiscal incentive
opportunity studies
Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the policy and fiscal incentive
opportunity studies report in three KEEs completed. Here are some
findings:
o Discussing sustainable development must always measure how the
performance of regulations, institutions, and infrastructure are
included in the context of KEE management. Therefore, regulations
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
2 2 4 Feb10-25,
2021
Yogyakarta
11
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
on KEE must be clarified so that stakeholders can use the regulations
as a reference in the management and development of KEE
o The budget planning policies related to KEEs at the national,
regional, and village levels have included KEEs in them, but some
have not explicitly included KEEs as part of their planning.
o The budget opportunity for KEE management are:
- National, provincial, district level: (1). The balancing national and
regional finances/budget provides opportunities that allow KEE
to become one of the conservation areas; and also
deconcentration budget. (2). The opportunity for revenue-
sharing from the Reforestation Fund (Dana Reboisasi), based on
proposals from the community, is very possible for allocations to
KEE, especially for conservation activities. (3). The regional
incentive budget (Dana Insentif Daerah/DID) makes it possible to
include indicators related to land area. This is where KEE has an
opportunity to conserve land, allowing it to take advantage of
DID.
- Village level: opportunities for village budget (Dana Desa/DD),
especially villages in the KEE area, have a great opportunity to
allocate budgets for KEE development
- Grants from government, corporate social responsibility /
private sector, universities, and non-government organizations /
civil society, have a great opportunity to develop KEEs.
2.4 Biodiversity inventory in KEE UP, MK, TK
2.4.1 Desk research Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) biodiversity potential data were
collected & three SMCA maps were developed.
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
1 3 4 Jan 2-5, 2021 Yogyakarta
2.4.2 Field data collection
Biodiversity inventory in
KEE
Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) the biodiversity data through
SMCA ground check were collected.
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
2 5 7 UP: Jan10-
17,2021
MK: Jan17-
21,2021
TK: Jan9-16,
2021
Gresik,
Sumenep,
Trenggalek
2.4.3 Data analysis and report
writing in KEE
biodiversity potential.
Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the KEE biodiversity potential
reports were completed. Some key finding of the activity, as follow:
Here the main finding of fauna in each KEE:
o KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili: The types of species that have the
highest density in the protected areas and sustainable use areas,
are Javan-pond heron (Ardeola speciose), swallow linchi (Collocalia
linchi), and brown-throated sunbird (Anthreptes malacensis).
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
2 5 7 Feb10-25,
2021
Yogyakarta
12
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
Sustainable use areas, recovery areas, and protected areas have
the same diversity index category which is medium. Apart from
turtles, important animal species that can be found at KEE Pantai
Taman Kili-kili include Japanese sparrowhawk (Accipiter gularis),
gajahan pengala (Numenius phaeopus), kipasan belang (Rhipidura
javanica), Javan plover (Charadrius javanicus), Javan coucal
(Centropus nigrorufus), Javan myna (Acridotheres javanicus), and
Rubby-throated bulbul (Rubigula dispar).
o KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah: Little egrets (Egretta garzetta) are
the species that have the highest density values in the protected,
sustainable use, and recovery areas of KEE Mangrove Ujung
Pangkah. The index of animal diversity in the protected and used
areas is in the high category. In contrast to the two areas, in the
area of recovery, the value of the animal diversity index is
moderate. Important species found in KEE Mangrove Ujung
Pangkah include: lesser adjutant (Leptoptilos javanicus), Javan coucal
(Centropus nigrorufus), Javan plover (Charadrius javanicus), eurasian
curlew (Numenius arquata), whimbrel (Numenius phaeopus), far
eastern curlew (Numenius madagascariensis), Malaysian pied fantail
(Rhipidura javanica), black-tailed godwit (Limosa limosa), bar-tailed
godwit (Limosa lapponica), Pasific golden plover (Pluvialis fulva),
greater sand plover (Charadrius leschenaultia), kentish plover
(Charadrius alexandrius), whiskered tern (Chlidonias hybrida), white-
winged ter (Chlidonias leucopterus), gull-billed tern (Sterna nilotica),
lesser crested tern (Thalasseus bengalensis), greater crested tern
(Thalasseus bergii), terek sandpiper (Xenus cinerus), common
redshank (Tringa tetanus).
o KEE Pulau Masakambing: Based on observations in the KEE area
on Masakambing Island, 22 bird species were recorded, 5 of which
were protected, one mammal species, and 3 herpetofauna species.
The results of the analysis show that KEE Masakambing has a
moderate diversity of bird species in areas of protection,
sustainable use, and recovery. In this protected area the most
individuals encountered were marine goggles with a density of
0.372 individuals/ha. In the sustainable use area, the most
individuals encountered were Cacatua sulphurea abotti with a
density of 0.673 individuals/ha. In the recovery area, the most
individuals encountered were species clogged rivers with a density of 0.309 individuals/ha. Bird species are more common in the
mangrove areas, although some are easily visible in plantation and
13
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
residential areas, such as Cacatua sulphurea abotti, Zosterops chloris,
Cinnyris jugularis, Todiramphus chloris.
2.5 Socio-Economic Assessment in KEE UP, MK, TK
2.5.1 Desk research Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) list of utilization types, potential
conflicts over the use of the KEE area.
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
1 3 4 Jan 2-5, 2021 Yogyakarta
2.5.2 Field data collection in
Socio-Economic
Assessment in KEE
Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the utilization of KEE areas and
potential conflict were collected based on interviews at 3 KEEs.
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
1 3 4 UP: Jan8-
28,2021
MK: Jan17-
20,2021
TK: Jan5-
15,2021
Gresik,
Sumenep,
Trenggalek
2.5.3 Data analysis and report
writing in socio-
economic assessment in
KEE
Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the socio-economic assessment
reports were completed.
A resume of the findings in the socio-economic assessment in KEE UP,
MK, and TK are as follow:
o Utilization of KEE areas.
- Economic interaction (Ujung Pangkah): The mobility of
community activities and their interactions with the Ujung
Pangkah area is more motivated as a source of livelihood land
in the form of ponds and fishermen.
- Ecologic interaction (Pantai Taman Kili-Kili): The involvement
and interest of the village government and community groups
(Pokmawas) in the coastal area of Taman Kili-Kili is more
based on motivation to carry out turtle rescue conservation.
- Ecology-economic interaction (Pulau Masakambing): This
pattern further describes the form of community subsistence
over the limited resources around it.
o Conflict potential
- Conflict of authority: In KEE Pantai Taman Kili-Kili between
Perhutani and Village Government/Community. In KEE Ujung
Pangkah related to oloran land (high/low-tide lands) between
village government and concession holder.
- Conflict of market actors: KEE Ujung Pangkah, ijon market
(bonded system) detrimental to fishermen and pond managers
- Conflict of roles: If one party does not have a strong
commitment, there will be a potential for conflict to split the
agreement that is built. This situation can happen at KEE
Masakambing. The skeptical and apathetic attitude of the
village government to initiate the designation of Masakambing
3 KEE, namely: UP,
MK, TK
1 3 4 Feb10-25,
2021
Yogyakarta
14
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
Island as KEEs, will result in the loss of public confidence in
accepting KEE as a conservation area.
o Potential opportunities for village institutions in managing KEE ie.
Village Owned Enterprises/BUMDes. BUMDes has the opportunity
to manage KEEs as long as it improves the conditions below:
- BUMDes do not yet have sufficient capacity to be involved in
providing added value, especially invaluable products.
- BUMDes does not have a good marketing network or build
partnerships with market players who control the marketing
chain.
- Not all village governments have provided support for the
role of BUMDes as the motor that drives the economy of the
community in the village.
3 Strengthening the institutional functions to achieve the effectiveness of KEE management
3.1 KEE management document development of KEE Teluk Pangpang (TP)
3.1.1 Development of KEE
Telung Pangpang management document
The draft KEE Teluk Pangpang management document was developed.
The activity was held on 23 December 2020. 27 people participated, including 23 males and 4 females. The activities to draft the document
of KEE Teluk Pangpang management (including the action plan, and
internal monitoring and evaluation), was completed by experts and
already discussed with the representation from the KEE forum. This
document has been consulted and discussed with the KEE Teluk
Pangpang forum for important input on institution and management
documents of KEE Teluk Pangpang later.
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE Teluk Pangpang
4 23 27 Dec 23,
2020
Banyuwangi
3.1.2 Stakeholders
consultation of KEE
Teluk Pangpang
management document
Important stakeholder inputs integrated into the final draft of the KEE
Teluk Pangpang management document.
The main inputs on the meeting are:
o Optimizing land utilization by agroforestry complex system and
ecotourism purposes. Agroforestry complex systems are
characterized by various tree species, like a natural forest that has
high biodiversity and multi-layer canopies. Through mangrove
landscape by applying agroforestry complex system can become
an ecotourism destination.
o Forum consolidation meetings need to be held monthly, to report
activities from each forum member and arrange plans for next
month.
o Promoting KEE area and biodiversity through social media and
another digital platform.
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
Teluk Pangpang
2 25 27 Jan 19, 2021 Banyuwangi
3.2 KEE area arrangement of KEE UP, MK, TK
15
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
3.2.1 Field mapping &
verification of KEE UP
KEE border identified and confirmed in the field and marked on 15
coordinate points with natural boundaries such as rivers, former docks,
bridge, etc. KEE spatial data collected, including KEE border
coordinates.
Based on the field mapping process, KEE Ujungpangkah has 23 percent
recovery zone, 40 percent sustainable use zone, and 37 percent
protected zone.
1 beneficiary of KEE
UP
6 29 35 Jan 19-23,
2021
Gresik
3.2.2 Field mapping &
verification of KEE MK
KEE border identified and confirmed in the field and marked with
natural boundaries & wood pal inscribed with “outermost point of KEE
Masakambing”, KEE spatial data collected, including KEE border
coordinates.
During the mapping process, the team succeeded in identifying the
boundaries of the KEE area on the outer boundary (batas luar) that
leads to the sea and the inner boundary (batas dalam) that leads to the
mainland. 10 coordinates defined the boundary of the KEE area. In
addition, field verification of the SMCA map has been carried out. The
SMCA map is a map produced by overlay mapping of the ecological and
socio-economic variables to create three categories, namely high,
medium, low. The low category means recovery zone, medium category
means sustainable use zone, and high category means protected zone.
Based on the field mapping process, KEE Pulau Masakambing has 39
percent recovery zone, 15 percent sustainable use zone, and 46 percent
protected zone.
1 beneficiaries of
KEE MK
2 16 18 Jan 18-22,
2021
Sumenep
3.2.3 Field mapping &
verification of KEE TK
KEE border identified and confirmed in the field and marked with
natural boundaries & wood pal inscribed “KEE TKK”, KEE spatial data
collected, including KEE border coordinates.
During the mapping process, the team succeeded to identify the
boundaries of the KEE area. It took 6 coordinates of the KEE area
boundary. In addition, field verification of the SMCA map has been
carried out. The SMCA map is a map produced by overlay mapping of
the ecological and socio-economic variables to create three categories,
namely high, medium, low. The low category means recovery zone,
medium category means sustainable use zone, and high category means
protected zone. Based on the field mapping process, KEE Pantai Taman
Kili-Kili has 27 percent recovery zone, 64 percent sustainable use zone,
and 9 percent protected zone.
1 beneficiaries of
KEE TK
5 34 39 Jan 9-15,
2021
Trenggalek
16
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
3.2.4 Development map of
area
arrangement/blocking of
3 KEE area
Blocking maps of KEE Ujung Pangkah, KEE Masakambing, and KEE
Taman Kili-Kili area management were developed based on field
mapping and verification.
Map of KEE Ujung Pangkah have scale 1:19.000; KEE Masakambing scale
1:5.000; KEE Taman Kili-Kili scale 1:7.000.
These maps inform KEE boundaries; recovery zone; sustainable use
zone; and protected zone. The map also informs village boundaries;
settlement; roads; river; state forest concession; turtle landing area for
KEE Kili-Kili map; important habitats for KEE Ujung Pangkah; and
important trees for cockatoos of KEE Masakambing.
3 beneficiaries of
KEE
1 3 4 Jan 24-30,
2021
Yogyakarta
3.3 Consolidation meeting of KEE forum for strengthening of KEE institutional and management document
3.3.1 TP phase 1 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE TP
(1). In general, the meeting resulted in several important things,
including the role of each division in the forum such as the secretariat,
division of planning, research and development; monitoring and
evaluation; division of community utilization and empowerment; and
division of conservation.
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
TP
7 26 33 Feb 10-11,
2021
Banyuwangi
3.3.1 TP phase 2 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE TP
(2).
o Important notes on the management document
- It is necessary to include the number of assistance activities as
an indicator for monitoring and evaluation assessments in the
protection action plan document 2021
- It is necessary to add procedures for implementing
monitoring and evaluation activities in the protection action
plan document 2021.
o Important notes on the institutional document
- Between management members of KEE TP are collaborative
relationships by reducing sectoral egos and prioritizing
coordination and communication.
- The commitments between KEE forums TP with other parties
i.e private sector related to KEE activities should be agreed
upon by the KEE forum leader
- Immediately KEE forum leader hearing to the Banyuwangi
Regent to present KEE forum activities. A letter requesting
the hearing will be made by BBKSDA of East Java.
27 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
TP
7 20 27 Mar 10,
2021
Banyuwangi
17
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
- Institutional governance documents that have been finalized
will be given to CDK Banyuwangi as a secretary of forum KEE
TP
- The secretariate of the forum expected to make the form
letterhead, vision and mission, and KEE logo.
3.3.2 UP phase 1 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE UP
(1).
Important points for developing institutional document: To
accommodate coordination between institutions, it is necessary to have
a secretariat located at the Environmental Office of Gresik Regency.
The Environmental officer of Gresik and BBKSDA Jawa Timur will be
allocated their human resource to operating the secretariat.
Important points for developing management document: Private sector
around the KEE area needs to always be involved in management
activities. The companies are: PETRONAS; PGN SAKA (PT Saka Energi
Indonesia); PT Smelting Gresik; PT Petrokimia Gresik.
36 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
UP
9 44 53 Mar16-17,
2021
Gresik
3.3.2 UP phase 2 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE UP
(2)
o Important notes on the management document
- KEE UP forum members from the Regional Apparatus
Organization (Organisasi Perangkat Daerah/OPD) already
have a budget from the 2021 APBD for the management of
KEE UP. They are expected to immediately realize their
activities. Meanwhile, members who do not have a budget
from the 2021 APBD for the management of KEE UP are
expected to immediately propose changes to the 2021 APBD.
- KEE UP forum member from the private sector, they are
expected to immediately realize their funding through a CSR
mechanism according to what has been planned by their
company.
- Final KEE UP action plan documents for 2021-2025 and action
plans for protection for 2021 immediately submitted to the
Directorate General of Conservation of Natural Resources
and Ecosystems (KSDAE) of the Ministry of Environment and
Forestry, guided by the East Java Center for Conservation of
Natural Resources and Ecosystems (KSDAE)
- In managing KEE UP, managers are expected to prioritize the
values of gender equality and social inclusion
o Important notes on the institutional document
36 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
UP
11 56 67 Apr12, 2021 Gresik
18
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
- The working relationship arrangement (tata hubungan
kerja/TAHUJA) is the multi-stakeholder collaborative
management principle under the coordination of the Assistant
for Economy and Development Regional Secretary of Gresik
as Chairman of the KEE Manager.
- The scope of work of the KEE UP managers are dynamic and
can undergo additions or changes following the processes that
are running in each division
- The Secretariat of KEE UP is located at the Office of the
Environment Office of Gresik Regency Jl. KH. Wahid Hasyim
No. 17. Further coordination regarding the institution will be
discussed at the secretariat. Routine meetings in 2021 will be
scheduled every two months by the Secretary to
accommodate the planned activity programs of each division.
- The Division of Planning, R & D, Monitoring and Evaluation,
and Cooperation are expected to now pay serious attention
to identifying opportunities for collaboration with third
parties i.e private sectors.
- Other divisions are Utilization, Conservation, Protection, and
Security immediately to hold a meeting for each division to
realize the activity plan at KEE UP
- KEE UP forum need to coordinate with related agencies
outside KEE, for example with the Regional Disaster
Management Agency (BPBD)
- Involving the Search and Rescue or SAR team in the activities
of the protection and security division.
3.3.3 MK phase 1 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE
MK (1). Here as follow, the important result of the meeting:
o Important points for developing institutional documents such as develop KEE secretariat at the Sumenep and Masakambing Island
proposed.
o Important points for developing management document such as
the Masakambing village government suggested developing village
regulations on mangrove protection proposed
o Follow-up on forum operational agreed, including the Forum
member of KEE Pulau Masakambing conducts field trips to the
Pulau Masakambing when the weather conditions allow
35 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
MK
5 26 31 Feb 18-19,
2021
Sumenep
3.3.3. MK phase 2 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE
MK (2).
Important notes on institutional document
35 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
MK
4 32 36 Mar 18,
2021
Sumenep
19
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
o The working relations between management members forum of
KEE MK are collaborative relationship by reducing sectoral egos
and prioritizing coordination and communication;
o Encourage the Head of Masakambing Village and the Masakambing
community as the main actors in various activities and
management of the KEE MK;
o Immediately KEE forum leader hearing to the Sumenep Regent to
present KEE forum activities;
o The institutional document of KEE MK serves as a guideline for
forum KEE MK work relations.
Important notes on management document
o BBKSDA Jawa Timur (the East Java Agency for Conservation of
Natural Resources) suggested to the forum to use data from the
Indonesian Cockatoo Conservation (KKI) and the BBKSDA Jawa
Timur on the types of flora and fauna biodiversity on
Masakambing Island.
o In 2021, the Sumenep Fisheries Service will focus on forming
groups for both fishermen and fish farming in Masakambing.
o The Masakambing village community proposed to Sumenep
Government to provide telecommunication facilities for cellular
and internet networks, provide electricity and transportation
access to Masakambing.
o The Sumenep Tourism Office proposed KEE MK branding as "the
Heart of the Archipelago" because of the island’s position in the
middle of the Indonesian archipelago.
o Suggestion from BBKSDA: KEE MK forum periodically updates
data on demographics, flora, and fauna.
o For the 2021 Action Plan, the Sumenep environmental officer
proposes several activities, including Purchasing Kapook trees
(Ceiba pentandra) and coconut (Cocos nucifera); Installation of
information boards related to KEE on Masakambing Island;
Protection of cockatoo nest trees; and Mangrove conservation
area development.
3.3.4 TK phase 1 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE TK
(1). Here as follow, the important result of the meeting:
o Important points for developing institutional documents such as
the Secretariat of KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili Forum at the Panggul
Trenggalek sub-district office proposed.
39 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
TK
10 50 60 Feb 15-16,
2021
Trenggalek
20
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
o Important points for developing management documents such as
the head of the field, namely the Trenggalek Residential Area and
Environment Agency, coordinate conservation activities proposed
o Follow-up on forum operational agreed including the development
of a logo, letterhead, and the KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili tagline by
the secretariat and ARuPA
3.3.4. TK phase 2 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE TK
(2).
Important notes on the institutional document
o The working relations between management members forum of
KEE TK are collaborative relationship by reducing sectoral egos
and prioritizing coordination and communication;
o There is a proposal to add the position of Deputy Regent of
Trenggalek as the Steering Committee for the KK TK forum;
o Immediately KEE forum leader hearing to the Trenggalek Regent
to present KEE forum activities. To note, this agenda has been
carried out on April 7, 2021.
o The institutional document of KEE MK is a guideline for forum
KEE MK work relations.
Important notes on management document
o There are proposals to re-emphasize the importance of
establishing a core protection zone covering land and water areas
through the designation of a marine protected area (MPA). This is
because the determination of the turtle conservation area cannot
only be on the mainland but must also include marine areas. The
determination of the MPA area is proposed to be the KEE core
zone.
o The area of the core zone is at least 10% of the total area
proposed to be free from activities other than conservation. In
this case, at KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili, there is still a catching
area for lobster seeds (BBL) in the waters of KEE Kili Kili Beach
39 beneficiaries of
stakeholder in KEE
TK
10 36 46 Mar 15,
2021
Trenggalek
3.3.5 Writing workshop for
finalizing institutional and
management document
of KEE UP, MK, TK, TP
phase 1
Draft 1 of institutional and management document of KEE UP, MK, TK,
TP developed. The target to finalize the draft 1 institutional document
of four KEEs arranged. The target to finalize the draft 1 management
document of four KEEs arranged.
4 KEE: UP, MK, TK,
TP
0 4 4 20 Days
within
Feb10-
Mar28, 2021
Yogyakarta
Gresik
Sumenep
Trenggalek
Banyuwangi
3.3.5. Writing workshop for
finalizing institutional and
management document
Final institutional and management document of KEE UP, MK, TK, TP
developed.
4 KEE: UP, MK, TK,
TP
0 4 4 12 days
within
Yogyakarta
21
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
of KEE UP, MK, TK, TP
phase 2
During approximately 33 working days, the writing team has
successfully written 12 documents with details of 4 Institutional
documents for 4 KEE locations and 8 Management documents for 4
KEE locations. The final institutional document is a document entitled
"Pedoman Tata Hubungan Kerja dan Pola Koordinasi Pengelola Kawasan
Ekosistem Esensial " and a final Management document in the form of a
5-year management document entitled "Rencana Aksi Pengelolaan
Kawasan Ekosistem Esensial Tahun 2021 – 2025" and an annual
management document entitled " Rencana Kegiatan Pelindungan Kawasan
Ekosistem Esensial Tahun 2021” for each of the 4 KEE locations.
Feb10-
Mar28, 2021
4 Increasing the capacity of forum members and community groups in managing KEE
4.2 Strengthening the utilization of KEE to support village potential-based KEE management objectives
4.2.1 Silvofishery training Four communities group of KEE had improved understanding of the
sustainable utilization of marine resources and how to cultivate fish in
mangrove areas and maintains the sustainability of KEE.
These were indicated by pre and post-test results and discussion processes during training. Pre and post-test result showed that
o Low level in the pre-test was 7 persons, and the post-test was 2
persons.
o Middle level in the pre-test was 14 persons, and the post-test was 9
persons.
o High level in the pre-test was 6 persons, and the post-test was 16
persons.
38 beneficiaries
from the community
group of KEE UP,
MK, TK, & TP
2 36 38 Jan 27-29,
2021
Banyuwangi
4.2.2 Ecotourism
development training in
the KEE area
Eight community tourism groups had improved on the capability to
identify the opportunity and to develop the ecotourism development
plan.
o Through the material training delivered by trainers, the community
understands the concept and basics of ecotourism management,
specifically in the KEE context. The achievement is indicated by the
post-test result as below:
- Low level in the pre-test was 10 persons, and the post-test was 2
persons.
- Medium level in the pre-test was 12 persons, and the post-test
was 11 persons.
- High level in the pre-test was 4 persons, and the post-test was 13
persons.
o The community, through forums and were assisted by a trainer, were
able to identify the opportunity to develop ecotourism, such as the
8 beneficiaries from
the community
tourism group and 4
beneficiaries from
KEE forum
representative of
KEE UP, MK, TK, &
TP.
7 31 38 Feb 24-26,
2021
Trenggalek
22
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
community of KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili who realized that turtle
habitat in KEE can be as magnitude for the visitor to learn more
about turtle conservation.
o The community through the forum and assisted by a trainer, were
able to develop the ecotourism development plan. For example, the
community around KEE Ujungpangkah plan to develop integrated
track of mangrove tour in 3 village.
4.2.3 Writing workshop and
assistance for drafting
the ecotourism business
plans of KEE TP
Draft of Business plan for developing ecotourism inside and around KEE
TP area developed.
Here as follow, the attraction recommended for each village are:
o Kedungasri: Mangrove tour and education, and Canoeing; Dragon
Fruit Agro-tourism for agro-tourism and resto; Darungan Hamlet
village tour and cycling; Candi Purwo for Pilgrim Tour.
o Kedunggebang: Mangrove tour and education, and Canoeing;
Dragon Fruit Agro-tourism; Krajan Hamlet village tour and photos.
o Wringinputih: Pine conservation– Mangrove Kawang for education
mangrove and fun games; Panoramic view of Kili Kili for Bird
watching; Teluk Pangpang mangrove tour; Cooking Class Produk
Mangrove and homestay in Krajan hamlet.
9 community groups
ecotourism
beneficiaries
11 40 51 14 days
within
Mar11-Apr8,
2021
Banyuwangi
4.2.4 Writing workshop and
assistance for drafting
the ecotourism business
plans of KEE UP
Draft of Business plan for developing ecotourism inside and around KEE
UP area developed.
1. Ujungpangkah Exploration Tour Package
The preparation of the Ujungpangkah Exploration tour package is
urgent to connect tourism attractions in the three villages in the KEE
UP. The main objective is to "extend" the length of stay of tourists by:
o Establish regular and measurable visiting patterns in a package;
o Providing Regional Interpretation Services;
o Changing the visiting model to be in groups;
o Providing a tourist-friendly mode of transportation (environment.
Tourists, community) and attractive;
o Connecting various attractions (in the form of activities) in a series
of visits.
2. Ujungpangkah Bengawan Solo Mangrove Conservation.
The Mangroove and Muara Bengawan Solo ecosystems are important
attributes possessed by KEE UP. As branding, both are only suitable to
be placed in the perspective of Ujung Pangkah as an area/landscape not
a village per village. In an ecotourism perspective, the form of
presenting attractions Around Mangrove is absolutely in the form of
9 community groups
ecotourism
beneficiaries
8 16 24 14 days
within
Mar11-
Apr12, 2021
Gresik
23
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
education and tourist involvement in conservation efforts
(Volunteerism).
4.2.5 Writing workshop and
assistance for drafting the ecotourism business
plans of KEE MK
Draft of Business plan for developing ecotourism inside and around KEE
MK area developed. Based on the analysis of the current conditions in Masakambing Island,
ecotourism products have been designed, namely:
o Bekka’ Experience
o Village Journey
o Beautiful Karang Putih (white coral)
o Bukit Keramat (sacred hill)
o Homestay
In addition, two tourism products are also interesting, namely:
o Voluntary program: Programs offered to institutions (eg Planette
urgence, GVI, ASSA, International Schools, Universities) following
the needs of Masakambing Village. Examples of programs: Coral Reef
Restoration, Ecological Farming, Quality Education at the basic level,
Mangrove Conservation.
o Research locations: With the rich biodiversity that exists in the
village of Masakambing, it opens up opportunities for research by
research institutes, universities, and groups
9 community groups
ecotourism beneficiaries
6 21 27 14 days
within Mar17-
Apr15, 2021
Sumenep
4.2.6 Writing workshop and
assistance for drafting
the ecotourism business
plans of KEE TK
Draft of Business plan for developing ecotourism inside and around KEE
TK area developed.
Recommendations for the development of tourism products in KEE
Pantai Taman Kili Kili:
o Kili-Kili Beach Turtle Conservation: Turtle Conservation Education
Tour & Turtle Nest Adoption
o Jekelan Hill: Jekelan EcoCamp Site (JECS)
o Wonocoyo Village: Village explore & Voluntourism Coastal conserve
9 community groups
ecotourism
beneficiaries
11 30 41 14 days
within
Mar10-Apr9,
2021
Trenggalek
5 Implementing the inventory of high biodiversity areas outside the conservation area
5.1 Development of Biodiversity
Information System in East
Java Province
The prototype of web GIS and mobile apps based biodiversity
information system developed. Then followed up with activities 5.1
Development of Biodiversity Information System in East Java Province,
conducted by ARuPA Experts. The biodiversity information system has
been produced which is still under trial and in advanced development.
Prototype of the system can access through the link as follows:
o Link webGIS https://inver-kehati-jatim.karogis.com/
2 beneficiaries,
namely: BBKSDA;
Forestry Service of
East Java
0 7 7 Jan 2021 Yogyakarta
24
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
o Link APK Android https://inver-kehati-
jatim.karogis.com/auth/login?next=%2F%3Faction%3DdownloadApp
login: operator; password: operator.
5.2 Development module for biodiversity inventory training
A biodiversity inventory module to guide the biodiversity inventory activity in 17 locations.
3 beneficiaries, namely BPEE;
BBKSDA of East
Java; and Forestry
Service of East Java.
1 4 5 Jan 6-8, 2021 & Jan 14-15,
2021
Yogyakarta
5.3 Training of trainer (ToT) for
biodiversity inventory team
Twenty persons from East Java Forestry Service, East Java BBKSDA,
and others had improved understanding the method and techniques for
biodiversity inventory and the operation of biodiversity information system. These were indicated by pre and post-test results and
discussion processes during training. Pre and post-test result showed
that:
o Low level in the pre-test was 7 persons, and the post-test was 2
persons.
o Middle level in the pre-test was 14 persons, and the post-test was
9 persons.
o High level in the pre-test was 6 persons, and the post-test was 16
persons.
20 persons from
East Java Forestry
Service, East Java BBKSDA, and other
3 17 20 Jan 4-6, 2021 Batu
5.4 Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis
(SMCA) for developing the
indicative map of high
biodiversity area
17 Indicative maps of high biodiversity areas for East Java Province
developed which has been overlaid with village administration area and
forest in Perum Perhutani area are developed.
2 beneficiaries,
namely: BBKSDA;
Forestry Service of
East Java
2 7 9 Jan 7-20,
2021
Yogyakarta
5.5 The collection of repository
secondary data
17 repository secondary data of biodiversity collected. 2 beneficiaries,
namely: BBKSDA;
Forestry Service of
East Java
0 5 5 Jan 6-20,
2021
Yogyakarta
5.6 Field data collection for high
biodiversity 17 locations in the
East Java
17 row material of high biodiversity area in 17 locations in the East Java
province and the Improvement of biodiversity information system based
on field data collection activity.
Field data collection batch 1 is still ongoing from 8 February to 3 March
2021 to accomplish 9 locations from 17 locations, and batch II will be
held on 8-22 March 2021 to complete the remaining 8 locations out of
17 total locations. When this activity is completed, it will produce:
o Row material of High biodiversity area in 9 locations in the East
Java province
o The Improvement of biodiversity information system based on field
data collection activity.
2 beneficiaries,
namely: BBKSDA;
Forestry Service of East Java
15 88 103 Phase 1:
Feb15-Mar1,
2021 Phase 2:
Mar8-22,
2021
Tuban
Trenggalek
Situbondo Sidoharjo
Sampang
Probolinggo
Pasuruan
Malang-Batu
Madiun-
Kediri
Lumajang
Surabaya
25
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
Field data collection of biodiversity for 17 location was completed, and
produce:
o High biodiversity data for 17 locations of 23 district in the East Java
province collected
o The Improvement of the biodiversity information system was
completed, by updating the data analysis system and revising the
placement of menus on the website.
Jember
Ijen Baluran
Gn. Kelud
DT Hyang
Banyuwangi
AlasPurwo-
Merubetiri
5.7 Data consolidation of ground
check results and secondary
spatial data
Report of analysis and consolidation of ground check data and
secondary data developed; Final draft of the information system was
developed. There are three steps to doing the inventory, namely: spatial
study; field inventory, and data analysis. In the spacial study, we have
done sequentially modeling of fauna priority species distribution;
analysis of biodiversity hotspots & least cost path; determination of
biodiversity inventory area; and finally class analysis of the Spatial Multi-
Criteria Analysis (SMCA). The spacial study resulted in 17 areas to be
inventory in the field. Secondly, we have done field inventories of high
biodiversity on 17 areas in East Java. The inventory team came from
ARuPA, East Java BBKSDA and Forestry Service. The final step is data
analysis. In sum, the finding from this activity are:
There are 17 locations of high biodiversity inventory. Determination of
locations based on biodiversity hotspot which is defined by fauna
distribution data combine by an environmental variable such as
elevation, proximity from rivers, and degree of slope.
To capture the variety of locations, we defined 4 categories of
biodiversity areas, namely corridor, buffer, protected, and isolate.
Corridor for areas as a connector between conservation areas. Buffer
for areas around the conservation area. Protection area for coastal,
mangrove, and certain geological uniqueness
The 17 locations are at 21 districts in East Java Province. From the total
location of 342.102,67 hectares, 205 species of birds, 10 species of
mammals, and 31 species of herpetofauna were recorded. Then for the
types of flora in the entire location has been identified there are 154
types of flora.
Each location of 17 areas has the status of high-medium-low of
biodiversity. From SMCA, we get information especially The
composition of biodiversity that has status high, medium, and low are in
2 beneficiaries,
namely: BBKSDA;
Forestry Service of
East Java
1 8 9 Mar24-31,
2021
Yogyakarta
26
NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS
DATE PLACE F M Total
each location. The locations which have high status more than 20% are
Tuban, Sampang, Sidoharjo, Malang-Batu, and Banyuwangi.
5.8 High biodiversity map
finalization and writing report
of high biodiversity inventory
Biodiversity identification and verification report in East Java province
and high biodiversity map developed.
The recommendation from this biodiversity inventory are: First, the
East Java Provincial Government could enact the 17 locations of
biodiversity inventory become KEEs. Second, on the KEEs, the
government needs to establish management forums for KEEs and
involve various stakeholders. Third, the need to develop action plan
documents for the effectiveness of the KEE management.
Furthermore, the results of these activities obtained a regional network
that can support biodiversity conservation in East Java and
accommodate public participation in its management. To accommodate
the public’s participation, we conducted the training of trainers for
various parties so that they can pass on their knowledge to other
parties. Such as the East Java BBKSDA and Forestry Service, and
involved Perhutani staff, CSO, and higher-education students in the field
of biodiversity inventory.
The result of biodiversity inventory on 17 locations in East Java can see
on this temporary website https://inver-kehati-jatim.karogis.com. in the
future, this website will be embedded as part of the official East Java
Government’s website. Until now, the process to embed the site is still
being negotiated until the end of May 2021. This website, which is called
“Si Merak Ati”, is also designed to provide biodiversity maps and data
for all districts in East Java. On 21 May 2021, USAID BIJAK has handed
over the biodiversity information system to the East Java Forestry
Service. The website will be used to analyze biodiversity inventory data,
develop plans to protect high biodiversity areas, and identify areas to
establish new KEEs. The East Java Forestry Service become the host to
manage the biodiversity data system in the “Si Merak Ati” website. We
have discussed with the East Java Forestry Service to arrange the
protocols to manage the website.
2 beneficiaries,
namely: BBKSDA;
Forestry Service of
East Java
1 10 11 Apr12-16,
2021
Yogyakarta
27
C. Description of Any Activities/Milestones Not Completed
There is no activities/milestones not completed.
D. Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Lessons learned and recommendations from this project are as follows:
NO LEVEL LESSONS LEARNED RECOMMENDATION
1 Supra KEE By considering Law No.
23/2014 on regional
government, and looking at
the situation in the field, it is
better if the role of the
provincial and district
governments needs to be
increased on the KEE issues.
So that the role of the central
government needs to be
reduced.
Enhancing the role of regional
government and reducing the
role of the national government
in KEE affairs. In addition, we
recommend that the Minister
of Environment and Forestry
(MoEF) Decree of on KEE be
issued soon.
In addition, need to purpose
and re-enforce the role of the
provincial government on KEE
development due to MoEF
Decree Number P.66 of 2015
about the De-centralization of
the environmental sector.
2 Forum of KEE KEE Forum members who
majority government officer in
the district and provincial level
are still concerned with the
role of each government
officers. In addition, the
legality of the forum is very
important as a basis for forum
members to prepare activity
plans and budgets in each
agency.
To overcome sectoral egos, it
is necessary to hold
consolidation meetings for
forum members periodically
and continuously. In addition,
the role of the Bupati (head of
district) or Sekda (District
secretary) is very important to
mobilize each district agency to
focus on KEE.
To have the OPD prioritize
KEEs in their work plan, they
need to be proposed to
Bappeda at the provincial and
district level to add the KEE
program in their planning
arrangement.
3 Community Since there are KEE programs
in four locations, communities
have started to realize how to
use natural resources
sustainably. However,
awareness among the public is
uneven because of the lack of
socialization on KEEs.
The need for KEE socialization
at the community level by the
village government and other
parties who are members of
the KEE forum. So, it needs to
be included in the KEE program
in the village’s official work
plan.
4 ARuPA The short duration of the
project implementation has
accelerated the work team
To achieve the effectiveness of
KEE management, need more
time and approaches to these
28
NO LEVEL LESSONS LEARNED RECOMMENDATION
and strategies. Even in a
COVID-19 pandemic situation,
ARuPA could still carry out
activities and achieve all
activities by optimizing the
technology and roles of site
officers and staff.
stakeholders to ensure all of
the recommendations can be
integrated into related
documents.
Based on the experiences in
this project, a stage that should
not be missed is the
stakeholder mapping to identify
the important stakeholders and
also in coordination and
consolidation forum KEE. In
addition, need to
synchronization the project
plan with the work plan of
government institutions such as
BBKSDA and Forestry Service
in provincial level.
E. Grant Success Stories
1. KEE Teluk Pangpang and KEE Ujungpangkah succeeded in emphasizing the importance of
mangroves and the protection of migratory birds to the community.
2. KEE Taman Kili Kili Beach, which is the landing site for Olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys
olivacea) and Leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) has succeeded in conserving turtles
and stopping poaching and illegal trade of turtles by the community.
3. KEE Pulau Masakambing has succeeded in protecting the population of abotti yellow-crested
cockatoo (Cacatua sulphurea) which currently number only 25 individuals in the wild.
4. With various stakeholders’ characteristics and KEE typology, ARuPA can define the right
strategies and approaches to gain commitment and support from related stakeholders. It
significantly accelerated the achievement of all targeted milestones in place.
5. Stakeholder mapping and local policy analysis is considered as the most important baseline data
to improve the participation of OPD in arranging their program and budget to support the
implementation of KEE action plan. Furthermore, the stakeholder analysis can provide clear
recommendations for determining the structure, role, and function of the members of the KEE
forums.
6. Lessons learned from KEE Teluk Pangpang on drafting the KEE forum decree have provided a
reference for the East Java BBKSDA and Forestry Service to replicate the decree for the other 3
KEEs.
7. The SMCA method provided strong recommendations on the different important values of KEE
areas to determine blocking maps for area management. The recommendation has been
integrated into the KEE action plan and KEE protection plan by determining the different
approaches for managing block based on the block characteristic (protection, sustainable
utilization, and rehabilitation)
8. The socio-economic studies provided alternative options to manage and utilize KEE areas in
certain blocks by considering the tenure and social relation.
9. Strong demand for high biodiversity data provided by Si Merak Ati as a platform for biodiversity
data center for conservation program planning, data-based decision-making, provision of a
biodiversity profile for district environmental services, monitoring the circulation of protected
and wild animals, projection of proposals, and designation of new KEE, and calculation of natural
resources balance. So, Si Merak Ati will become a hub for the distribution of data used in
29
achieving the performance indicators of both the East Java forestry service, East Java BBKSDA,
and district environmental services in East Java.
10. Acceptance of the project by BPEE at the national level and the East Java BBKSDA and Forestry
Service at the provincial level because we build agreement and synchronizing the project plan
with government work plan in national, provincial, and district level.
F. Product/documents resulted from grants activities
Please follow the link below:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1YQGWV0Bx62lXhLUJh39AhpSF5utsH-ov
1. Report of stakeholder mapping studies
2. Report of fiscal incentive studies
3. Report of biodiversity studies
4. Report of socio-economic studies
5. Institutional documents of 4 KEE (include several records of agreements)
6. Action plan documents of 4 KEE
7. Protection plan documents of 4 KEE
8. Biodiversity inventory report on 17 location in East Java
9. Module of biodiversity inventory manual
10. apps Si Merak Ati manual
11. webGIS Si Merak Ati manual
30
Section II - Financial
A. Description of grant activity funding
During the project implementation in phase I and phase II, USAID BIJAK grant funding contributed
greatly in helping ARuPA implement activities and achieve its objectives. USAID BIJAK funded all the
implemented activities. The only activity with third-party contribution was activity 5.3 - Training of
trainer (ToT) for biodiversity inventory team. Because the East Java Forestry Services wanted to add
more participants, they contributed to the budget, mostly for accommodation and transportation of
additional participants who came from the province and district level in East Java.
The management of the budget became challenging, especially in phase II because we had to
implement several activities almost simultaneously in 4 different locations. To avoid any funding
delays from USAID BIJAK, the financial department made intensive communications with ARuPA
program manager and executive director of the financial situation, and activities that are planned and
implemented so that they can be executed on time which also implies in the report submission as
the requirements of the fund transfer of each milestone.
B. Summary of Grant Activity Costs and Payments
Fixed amount award
Chemonics Grant
Budget Commitment
Total Milestone
Payments Variation Action Taken
Milestone 1 IDR 15,900,000 - -
Milestone 2 IDR 49,420,000 - -
Milestone 3 IDR 62,820,000 - -
Milestone 4 IDR 101,800,000 - -
Milestone 5 IDR 88,480,000 - -
Milestone 6 IDR 176,080,000 - -
Milestone 7 IDR 120,920,000 - -
Milestone 8 IDR 68,020,000 - -
Milestone 9 IDR 356,150,000 - -
Milestone 10 IDR 759,850,000 - -
Milestone 11 IDR 687,310,000 - -
Milestone 12 IDR 1,116,100,000 - -
Milestone 13 IDR 514,200,000 - -
Milestone 14 IDR 993,400,000 - -
31
Chemonics Grant
Budget Commitment
Total Milestone
Payments Variation Action Taken
Milestone 15 IDR 316,500,000 - -
Milestone 16 IDR 322,250,000 - -
Milestone 17 IDR 171,150,000 - -
TOTAL IDR 5,920,350,000
C. Explanation of higher or lower than anticipated costs
In activities implemented by ARuPA, all milestones and activities are completed. All the budget has
been used for each of the activities. Most of the activities’ costs fell close to the budget. Only two
activities were overbudget: activity 3.3.2 - Consolidation meeting for developing KEE institutional
and management document of KEE Ujung Pangkah (I) and activity 3.3.2 - Consolidation meeting for
developing KEE institutional and management document of KEE Ujung Pangkah (II). The over-budget
was caused by the doubling of participants because all KEE Forum members are suggested to attend.
Consequently, we had to provide a meeting package twice the original budget. We asked the hotel
to reduce the selection of food/snack items in each pax to reduce the price and avoid excessive
over-budget.
Regarding the milestone payments, at the beginning of phase II, some milestone payments were late
because of the lateness of the signing of the modification of the agreement while we have to keep
submitting the report of each milestone according to the schedule in the milestone. This situation
forces some activities keep being implemented while the milestone funds were late to be disbursed.
This situation also forces us to make more prefinance than predicted. But, in the middle of the
implementation of phase II, the funding has been going well.
During the grant receipt process, several modifications were made:
• Modification I
Based on information from the Government of Indonesia Task Force for the Acceleration of
Handling COVID-19, on June 28, 2020, the daily increases of positive cases of COVID in
Indonesia averaged more than 1,000/day for the past week. Currently, the East Java Province is
a Covid-19 red zone, with a cumulative number of 11,482 cases
(http://infocovid19.jatimprov.go.id/index.php/data).
According to a notice issued by the Minister of Administrative Reform and Bureaucratic Reform
No. 58 of 2020 on the work system of government employees in the new normal order,
employees of central and regional agencies are encouraged to carry out meetings and
communications activities through electronic media. In addition, official travel should be carried
out selectively and only for priority and urgent reasons.
To comply with the government’s notice, ARuPA shifted its implementation methodology from
conducting in-person events to using an online meeting platform. We conducted the
Consolidation and Socialization program (activity #1.2) and Stakeholder mapping and KEE
management gap analysis (activity #1.3) using the online meeting platform. This shift had two
results: (1) a change in the deliverables produced; and (2) underspending of funds that were
originally budgeted for the in-person events. Under this amendment, ARUPA allocated the
32
underspent funds to carry out a new activity, the social assessment of communities around KEE
Teluk Pangpang (see activity #4.2).
• Modification II
The second modification was made because the four new locations were added into the
project. Since the award in May 2020, ARuPA has collaborated with the East Java BBKSDA and
Forestry Service to implement a pilot activity to improve the effectiveness of KEE management
at the site level. This piloting focused on strengthening the institutional design of the KEE
manager and the KEE management plan at the KEE Teluk Pangpang, Banyuwangi. After three
months of piloting, The new approach taken by AruPA has been approved by the East Java
BBKSDA and Forestry Service , where the new approach focused to strengthen and provide
more intensive stakeholder collaboration, clarify roles and functions among KEE management
forum members, and serve as the foundation to achieve effectiveness on KEE management. As a
result, East Java BBKSDA and Forestry Agency has requested ARuPA to strengthen this process
and replicate the good practices in KEE Teluk Pangpang to three additional locations.
Due to the success of the KEE pilot in Teluk Pangpang, modification no. 02 will expand the pilot
activities to strengthen the effectiveness of KEE management in three additional locations,
which are (1) KEE Ujung Pangkah in Gresik, (2) KEE Pantai Taman Kili-Kili in Trenggalek, and (3)
KEE Masakambing in Sumenep. The expanded scope of work is summarized in Table 1 below.
With additional activities in 3 KEEs, modification 02 was made to extend the agreement period
to April 30, 2021, and increase the budget for the implementation of the activities to Rp.
6,437,850,000, -
• Modification III
The third modification was made because the impact of Covid-19 was still in motion at that
time. On February 10, 2021, BIJAK met with ARuPA to discuss the status of the activities, the
impact of Covid-19, and the completion timeline for the remaining activities. Given the ongoing
uncertainty with Covid-19, ARuPA agreed to reduce some activities that may delay the
implementation of activities in the remaining weeks of the grant. As a result, ARuPA proposed
these revisions to the activities:
1. Changes to the number of days of activity implementation and number of LOE of
honorarium for experts on activities:
• All Activities under #3.3 and Activities #4.2.3 through #4.2.6, #5.7, and #5.8
2. Cancellation of the following activities:
• All Activities under #3.4 and Activity #4.1
With these changes, the overall impact on reducing the budget by Rp. 517,500,000 from the
previous total budget of Rp. 6,437,850,000, -