Date post: | 02-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | agatha-ross |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Student Support Teams Training: March 7, 2006
Stephanie Wood-GarnettExecutive Director
State Improvement GrantDistrict of Columbia Public Schools
OBJECTIVES
• Review key components of the Master Education Plan (MEP)
• Examine DCPS data• Introduce the new Student Support
Team (SST) process• Discuss ways in which the SST can
support the instructional and behavioral needs of adolescents
180
200
220
240
260
Ave
rag
e S
cale
Sco
re
Cleveland New YorkCity
Boston San Diego NationalPublic
Charlotte Chicago h Atlanta District ofColumbia
NAEP 2005 Grade 4 Reading,African American-White Gaps
African American White
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde
180
200
220
240
260
Ave
rag
e S
cale
Sco
re
Cleveland New YorkCity
Chicago NationalPublic
Boston San Diego Charlotte Los Angeles District ofColumbia
NAEP 2005 Grade 4 Reading,Latino-White Gaps
Latino White
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde
180
200
220
240
260
Ave
rag
e S
cale
Sco
re
Boston New YorkCity
San Diego NationalPublic
Chicago Charlotte District ofColumbia
Los Angeles Atlanta
NAEP 2005 Grade 4 Reading,Poor-Non Poor Gaps
Poor Non-Poor
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde
Master Education Plan (MEP)
• Realities:• 15, 190 (¼ of students) are older than
their classmates by at least 1 grade (22)
• 3,619 are older than classmates by at least 2 grades (23)
• 71% of retained students eventually drop out of school (ASCD, 2003)
Master Education Plan (MEP)
• 1/3 of DCPS high school students drop out before graduating (22)
• 13 elementary schools failed to make AYP because of attendance failure (21)
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
• Rate of reading failure for African Americans, Hispanics, limited English speakers, and poor children ranges is 60% (70% in urban areas)
• Of the children who will eventually drop out of school > 75% report reading difficulties
• Approximately 50% of children and adolescents with a history of substance abuse have reading problems
INITIAL REFERRALS TO SPECIAL EDUCATION
• Prior to 2004, approximately 200-400 students were referred for special education each month
• Of those referred, 1/3 were found ineligible
DCPS Office of Special Education Programs
Percent of all Referrals by School Level and Year
School Division 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005
Elementary Schools 0.826 0.832 0.816
Middle/Junior High Schools 0.119 0.127 0.149
Senior High Schools 0.055 0.041 0.035
Total 1.0 1.0 1.0
DCPS SIG 2005
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION
IMPROVEMENT ACT (2004)
Reflects heightened intensity that we must do more before referring children to special
education.
IDEA 2004
In making a determination of eligibility under Section 614(b)(4)(A) of IDEA:
• a child shall not be determined to be a child with a disability if the determinant factor for such determination is lack of appropriate instruction in reading, including in the essential components of reading instruction (as defined in Section 1208(3) of ESEA); lack of instruction in math; or limited English proficiency. [614(b)(5) of IDEA].
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (2000)
• African American students: • 14.8% of the student population• 20.2% of the students in programs for
students with disabilities• 2.9 times as likely to be labeled mentally
retarded (MR)• 1.9 times as likely to labeled seriously
emotionally disturbed (SED)• 1.3 times as likely to be labeled as having
a learning disability (LD)
Boys Over-represented…
• 1.9 million girls and 3.8 million boys are classified as special education (U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, 2000)
• Boys dominate the emotionally disturbed category:• 90% in Kansas City• 55% in Milwaukee• 76% in Washington, DC
Student Support Teams (SST)
• SSTs are designed to meet the unique learning and behavioral needs of students in the general education environment
All students regardless of socioeconomic status– need
sustained support to succeed
James Comer, School Development Program, Yale University
Principles of SST• SST is not to “operate as a special
education eligibility or placement committee” (NABSE and ILIAD Project, 2002, p. 19)
• SST is NOT meant to deny services to students who may actually have a disability
• SSTs should NOT assume the difficulty lies solely within the child…
Master Education Plan (MEP)
• DCPS will offer “increased supports and assistance that meet students’ individual needs” (p. 10).
• “All interventions will be regularly monitored and evaluate; as necessary, we will make revisions” (p. 11)
• Students: SSTs will “recommend specific steps teachers can take to help you catch up”
Master Education Plan (MEP)
• Goal: reduce the number of students for whom special education is the only option by ensuring group and individual interventions that quickly enable students to meet grade-level literacy and math standards (p. 57 – 58)
“No significant learning occurs without a significant
relationship”
James ComerSchool Development Program
Yale University
Impact of Effective SSTs
• Reduce unnecessary referrals to special education
• Support improved academic achievement
• Support improved student behavior
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
No. of Referrals
SY02-03 SY03-04 SY04-05 SY05-06
School Year
Total Referrals
Total Referrals
DCPS: Intervening Earlier to Reduce the Over-reliance on Special Education
Services
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
No. of Referrals
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Month
Special Education Referrals by Month
SY02-03
SY03-04
SY04-05
SY05-06
DCPS: Intervening Earlier to Reduce the Over-reliance on Special
Education Services
Referrals SY02-03 to SY05-06
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
Months
# o
f R
efe
rra
ls SY02-03
SY03-04
SY04-05
SY05-06
DCPS: Intervening Earlier to Reduce the Over-reliance on Special Education Services
Schools Increasing Supports to Assist Students – 0 Referrals
• Adams ES• Amidon ES• Brent ES• Brightwood ES• Brookland ES• Burrville ES• Draper ES• Garfield ES• Ketcham ES• LaSalle ES
• Meyer ES• Noyes ES Oyster ES• Parkview ES• Peabody ES• Seaton ES• Shaed ES• Thomson ES• Tyler ES• Wheatley ES• Young ES