+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Student Support Teams Training: March 7, 2006 Stephanie Wood-Garnett Executive Director State...

Student Support Teams Training: March 7, 2006 Stephanie Wood-Garnett Executive Director State...

Date post: 02-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: agatha-ross
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
35
Student Support Teams Training: March 7, 2006 Stephanie Wood-Garnett Executive Director State Improvement Grant District of Columbia Public Schools
Transcript

Student Support Teams Training: March 7, 2006

Stephanie Wood-GarnettExecutive Director

State Improvement GrantDistrict of Columbia Public Schools

OBJECTIVES

• Review key components of the Master Education Plan (MEP)

• Examine DCPS data• Introduce the new Student Support

Team (SST) process• Discuss ways in which the SST can

support the instructional and behavioral needs of adolescents

The District’s Student Data…

180

200

220

240

260

Ave

rag

e S

cale

Sco

re

Cleveland New YorkCity

Boston San Diego NationalPublic

Charlotte Chicago h Atlanta District ofColumbia

NAEP 2005 Grade 4 Reading,African American-White Gaps

African American White

Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

180

200

220

240

260

Ave

rag

e S

cale

Sco

re

Cleveland New YorkCity

Chicago NationalPublic

Boston San Diego Charlotte Los Angeles District ofColumbia

NAEP 2005 Grade 4 Reading,Latino-White Gaps

Latino White

Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

180

200

220

240

260

Ave

rag

e S

cale

Sco

re

Boston New YorkCity

San Diego NationalPublic

Chicago Charlotte District ofColumbia

Los Angeles Atlanta

NAEP 2005 Grade 4 Reading,Poor-Non Poor Gaps

Poor Non-Poor

Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

Master Education Plan (MEP)

• Realities:• 15, 190 (¼ of students) are older than

their classmates by at least 1 grade (22)

• 3,619 are older than classmates by at least 2 grades (23)

• 71% of retained students eventually drop out of school (ASCD, 2003)

Master Education Plan (MEP)

• 1/3 of DCPS high school students drop out before graduating (22)

• 13 elementary schools failed to make AYP because of attendance failure (21)

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

• Rate of reading failure for African Americans, Hispanics, limited English speakers, and poor children ranges is 60% (70% in urban areas)

• Of the children who will eventually drop out of school > 75% report reading difficulties

• Approximately 50% of children and adolescents with a history of substance abuse have reading problems

INITIAL REFERRALS TO SPECIAL EDUCATION

• Prior to 2004, approximately 200-400 students were referred for special education each month

• Of those referred, 1/3 were found ineligible

DCPS Office of Special Education Programs

Percent of all Referrals by School Level and Year

School Division 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005

Elementary Schools 0.826 0.832 0.816

Middle/Junior High Schools 0.119 0.127 0.149

Senior High Schools 0.055 0.041 0.035

Total 1.0 1.0 1.0

DCPS SIG 2005

INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION

IMPROVEMENT ACT (2004)

Reflects heightened intensity that we must do more before referring children to special

education.

IDEA 2004

In making a determination of eligibility under Section 614(b)(4)(A) of IDEA:

• a child shall not be determined to be a child with a disability if the determinant factor for such determination is lack of appropriate instruction in reading, including in the essential components of reading instruction (as defined in Section 1208(3) of ESEA); lack of instruction in math; or limited English proficiency. [614(b)(5) of IDEA].

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (2000)

• African American students: • 14.8% of the student population• 20.2% of the students in programs for

students with disabilities• 2.9 times as likely to be labeled mentally

retarded (MR)• 1.9 times as likely to labeled seriously

emotionally disturbed (SED)• 1.3 times as likely to be labeled as having

a learning disability (LD)

Is there something in the way HE moves?!

Boys Over-represented…

• 1.9 million girls and 3.8 million boys are classified as special education (U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, 2000)

• Boys dominate the emotionally disturbed category:• 90% in Kansas City• 55% in Milwaukee• 76% in Washington, DC

PURPOSE OF THE SIG

UNNECESSARY SPECIAL

EDUCATION

Student Support Teams (SST)

• SSTs are designed to meet the unique learning and behavioral needs of students in the general education environment

All students regardless of socioeconomic status– need

sustained support to succeed

James Comer, School Development Program, Yale University

Principles of SST• SST is not to “operate as a special

education eligibility or placement committee” (NABSE and ILIAD Project, 2002, p. 19)

• SST is NOT meant to deny services to students who may actually have a disability

• SSTs should NOT assume the difficulty lies solely within the child…

What other entities are focused on intervention

within DCPS?

Master Education Plan

Master Education Plan (MEP)

• DCPS will offer “increased supports and assistance that meet students’ individual needs” (p. 10).

• “All interventions will be regularly monitored and evaluate; as necessary, we will make revisions” (p. 11)

• Students: SSTs will “recommend specific steps teachers can take to help you catch up”

Master Education Plan (MEP)

• Goal: reduce the number of students for whom special education is the only option by ensuring group and individual interventions that quickly enable students to meet grade-level literacy and math standards (p. 57 – 58)

“No significant learning occurs without a significant

relationship”

James ComerSchool Development Program

Yale University

Impact of Effective SSTs

• Reduce unnecessary referrals to special education

• Support improved academic achievement

• Support improved student behavior

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

No. of Referrals

SY02-03 SY03-04 SY04-05 SY05-06

School Year

Total Referrals

Total Referrals

DCPS: Intervening Earlier to Reduce the Over-reliance on Special Education

Services

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

No. of Referrals

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

Month

Special Education Referrals by Month

SY02-03

SY03-04

SY04-05

SY05-06

DCPS: Intervening Earlier to Reduce the Over-reliance on Special

Education Services

Referrals SY02-03 to SY05-06

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan

Months

# o

f R

efe

rra

ls SY02-03

SY03-04

SY04-05

SY05-06

DCPS: Intervening Earlier to Reduce the Over-reliance on Special Education Services

Schools Increasing Supports to Assist Students – 0 Referrals

• Adams ES• Amidon ES• Brent ES• Brightwood ES• Brookland ES• Burrville ES• Draper ES• Garfield ES• Ketcham ES• LaSalle ES

• Meyer ES• Noyes ES Oyster ES• Parkview ES• Peabody ES• Seaton ES• Shaed ES• Thomson ES• Tyler ES• Wheatley ES• Young ES

Contact Information

• State Improvement Grant• www.dcsig.org• 202-442-5539• Stephanie Wood-Garnett


Recommended