+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and...

Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and...

Date post: 04-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: russell-hampton
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
53
Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion- fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier fusion enhancement of 32 S+ 90,96 Zr Part III. The study of the surface property of nuclear potential by quasi- elastic scattering Part IV. The breakup threshold anomaly of 9 Be+ 208 Pb, 209 Bi Part V. Two-proton emission from 29 S, 28 P excited states after Coulomb excitation. Huanqiao Zhang China Institute of Atomic Energy (CIAE) 中中中中中中中中中中 China Institute of Atomic Energy weihai, 2011. 8. 8-11
Transcript
Page 1: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier

• Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32S+184W reaction

• Part II. Sub-barrier fusion enhancement of 32S+90,96Zr• Part III. The study of the surface property of nuclear

potential by quasi-elastic scattering• Part IV. The breakup threshold anomaly of

9Be+208Pb,209Bi• Part V. Two-proton emission from 29S,28P excited states

after Coulomb excitation.

Huanqiao Zhang

China Institute of Atomic Energy (CIAE)

中国原子能科学研究院China Institute of Atomic Energy

weihai, 2011. 8. 8-11

Page 2: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi-fission in 32S+184W reaction

Motivation: 1) Fusion-fission dynamics –- Quasi-fission, Pre-equilibrium fission ……

2) Deformation effects in the entrance channels 3) Shell effects in the compound nuclei 32S+184W -> 216Th (N=126)

Page 3: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

T DNS P

ER

CN

QF

FF

Page 4: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Experimental Setup

Beam: 32S ELab: 140 , 145 , 150 , 155, 160 , 165 , 170 MeV.Typical beam current: 800-1000 enA. Target: about 200ug/cm2 with 20μg/cm2 carbon foil backing.

Page 5: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

32S+184WELab=170MeVθLab=54.850 elastic

Energy Spectrometry

32S+184WELab=170MeVAngle: 76.90---83.980

DF01 : 54.850

Fission production

Correlated two fission fragments

Page 6: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

The experimental angular distributions of the fission fragments and the fitting with Saddle-Point Transitional State model.

Page 7: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

2/1

a

ET x

Page 8: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

The measured capture cross sections and the deduced values of Aexp and K20

for the 32S+184W reaction. The total cross section was deduced from the integration of the differential cross sections.

Main result

Page 9: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Comparison with theory calculation (DNS)

Dinuclear system is formed at the initialstage of the reaction, kinetic energy istransferred into potential and excitation.

Necessary conditions:1. presence of a potential pocket;2. adequacy of the collision energy Ec.m to

overcome the interaction barrier

Characterized by mass (charge) symmetry of its nuclei, rotational energy Vrot and excitation energy E*

DNS.

Dot-dashed line: the capture path

Solid line: potential well

Page 10: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

The driving potential Udr(Z) is a curve linking minimums corresponding to each charge asymmetry Z in the valley of the potential energy surface from Z = 0 up to Z = ZCN.

The dinuclear system formed in the collision of two nuclei evolves to fusion by increasing its mass asymmetry. The evolution of the system along the mass asymmetry degree of freedom is described by the driving potential. A path to fusion is determined by potential energy surface.

The potential energy surface for a dinuclear system leading to the formation of 216Th*

Page 11: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

the value of driving potential Z=16 for the small orientation angle 15° (solid line) and 45°(dashed line).

The quasi-fission spin distributions

Page 12: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Zhang et.al. Phys. Rev. C 81,034611(2010)

Page 13: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

The presentation of fusion probability PCN

The elongated shape leads to quasi-fission

The large l contribution leads to quasi-fission

Page 14: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Part II. Sub-barrier fusion enhancement of 32S+90,96Zr

Sub-barrier fusion enhancement due to the couplings to the intrinsic degrees of freedom and nucleon transfer channels has been found since 1980s.

Research the effect of positive Q-value multi-neutron transfer on the fusion enhancement at sub-barrier energies for 32S+96Zr system.

Page 15: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Reduced fusion excitation functions of 36S,40,48Ca+90,96Zr systems

Fusion evaporation residua measurement:

Page 16: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Experimental setup

Electrostatic deflector (Separated by electric-rigidity)

suppression ratio >108 c.s. down to b level

beam target Si(Au)electrodes

MCP

The schematic plot of the electrostatic deflector

Page 17: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Eva. residua

Contaminator

Target recoils

Scattering 32S

Recoil 12C

The ΔE-TOF spectrum of the reaction products after separation.

The experimental fusion excitation functions of 32S+90,96Zr systems

70 75 80 85 90 95

10-1

100

101

102

103

fus (

mb)

Ec.m.

(MeV)

32S+90Zr

32S+96Zr

Page 18: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Comparison with Zagrebaev’s theory:

Phys. Rev. C 67 061601(R) (2003)

assume a successive transfer mechanism of single neutrons

(a direct nucleon pair transfer?)

Page 19: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Qgg-value for neutron pickup Separation energies of each neutron for 96Zr

Dotted line: single-channel

Solid line: coupled to inelastic excitation states

Dashed line: coupled to inelastic excitation states + neutron transfer

Page 20: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. C 82 054609(2010)

Page 21: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Part III. The research of the surface property of nuclear potential by quasi-elastic scattering

Aim:

1. Research the difference of the diffuseness parameter extracted from fusion and elastic scattering.

2. Research the difference of the diffuseness parameter extracted from the spherical and deformed systems by using quasielastic scattering.

Page 22: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Phys. Rev. C 70 024605(2004)

The values of the diffuseness parameter a as a function of Z1Z2 extracted from the fusion excitation

functions above the barrier energies.

1. Larger than the commonly accepted value;

2. Increase with the increase of Z1Z2.

Phys. Rev. C 73 034607 (2006)

The values of the diffuseness parameter a are different for

spherical and deformed systems.

Deformed systems

The open symbols represent the values deduced from fusion cross section.

Page 23: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Extract the diffuseness parameter using the backward quasi-elastic scattering at deep sub-barrier energies.

Phys. Rev. C 76 024612 (2007)

Page 24: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

A way to extract the a parametersmall deviation due to VN

Quasi-elastic (QEL) scattering is sensitive to the surface property of the nuclear potential at deep sub-barrier energy region.

Phys. Rev. C 69 054610 (2004)

Page 25: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Experimental setup

in order to effectively reduce the scattered electrons and projectiles into backward detectors.

Energy spectrum of the projectile-like particles at θlab=175°

Page 26: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

As also reported in PRC78, 034614 (08)

Energy spectrum of the projectile-like particles at θlab=175°

More complicated than transfer mechanism.

More exit channels populated than what is included in the CC calculations.

reaction mechanism?

low inelastic statesProton transfer?

Multi-nucleon transfer or deep inelastic? Z and A identification!

ANU group

Page 27: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Excitation functions of quasi-elastic scatterings at 175

Page 28: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

the parameters of optical potentialI. a short range imaginary potential (produces absorption): W= 30 MeV, aw= 0.1 fm, and rw = 0.8 fm

II. real potential (produces a deflection) Keep V0 = 100 MeV fixed Constraint: reproduce the expected average fusion barrier energy using the 3 parameters.

using a modified CCFULL code CQUEL by K. Hagino

confine the analysis data to dσqel/d σRu>0.94 (expect the coupling

effect is negligible in this range)

Data analysis:

Phys. Rev. C 71 044612 (2005); 76 024612( 2007); 78 034614 (2008)

Coupling to the low inelastic states of the targets was included;

without coupling to the inelastic states of projectile.

Page 29: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Lin et al., Phys. RevC79_064603_(2009)

Page 30: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Part IV. The breakup threshold anomaly of 9Be+208Pb,209Bi.

The threshold anomaly (TA) comes from the coupled-channels (CC) effects and plays an important role in heavy ion reactions at the energies around Coulomb barrier.

How does the breakup of the weakly bound projectile affect the TA ?

Page 31: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

J. S. Lilley, et al., Phys. Lett. B 151,181, (1985).

First observed in

Page 32: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Two different results:

C. Signorini, et al., 9Be+209Bi unusual optical behavior Phys. Rev. C, 61, 061603, (2001).

Woolliscroft, et al., 9Be+208Pb. threshold anomaly, Phys. Rev. C 69, 044612, (2004).

Page 33: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Elastic scattering angular distributions for the 9Be+208Pb,209Bi systems and the optical model fit with PTOLEMY.

Page 34: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

The real and imaginary parts of optical potential for the two systems.

The breakup/unusual threshold anomaly

N. Yu et.al., J. Phys. G. 37(2010) 075108

Page 35: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

25 30 35 40

10-2

10-1

100

9Be+208Pb

dqe

l/d R

u

Ec.m.

(MeV)

Quasi-Elastic excitation function and barrier distribution for 9Be+208Pb

H. M. Jia, et.al., Phys. Rev. C82, 027602(2010)

Page 36: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

17F+12C弹性散射

Page 37: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.
Page 38: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.
Page 39: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.
Page 40: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.
Page 41: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Part V. Two-proton emission from 29S,28P excited states after Coulomb excitation.

Two-proton radioactivity:

1) Two-body sequential emission;

2) Three-body simultaneously democratic emission;

3) 2He cluster emission and following breakup.

Decay Dynamics

of two-proton emission from excited states

Invariant Mass,qpp=|p1-p2|/2,the relative momentum,

ppcm ,the opening angle, the relative energy,

.......

Experiment Theory

Three body models,The extended R-matrix theory,

The Faddeev equations,.......

Page 42: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Complete-kinematics measurements

Secondary target: 197Au,100 µm

SD: Silicon detectors, 325 ,1000 µm

SSSD: Single sided Silicon Strip Detectors, 300 µm, 24 strips with 2 mm in the

width and 0.1 mm in the interval for the construction of the particle trajectories CsI(Tl) detectors: 6×6 lattices ,each 15×15×20mm,

read out through PIN photodiodes

Page 43: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Two-proton correlation for 7.4MeV state

• 7.0<Ex<7.8MeV

• The maximum at qpp=35 MeV and the opening angle of sinθ indicates the branching ratio of 2He emission less than 10% with MC simulations (for three-body democratic decay, no FSI)

Page 44: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Two-proton correlation for 10.0MeV state of 29S

• 9.6<Ex<10.4MeV

• The enhanced peaks at qpp=20MeV/c and θpp=35o According to MC simulations (for three-body democratic decay, no FSI) the branching ratio of 2He emission is 29 % .

1011

C.J. Lin et al. Phys. Rev. C 80, 014310 (2009)

Page 45: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Excitation-energy spectrum of 29S reconstructed from 27Si+p+p events

grii McPEE 22* )()(

where Ei and Pi are the total energy

and the momentum of each fragment

including heavy ions and light

protons, Mgr is the ground-state mass

of mother nuclei.

The configurations (J π) of these levels are still unknown and

information is not available in the literature at all. The experimental

excitation-energy resolution was estimated as 400 keV.

Page 46: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

Two-proton correlation for 28P Ex<17MeV

X.X. Xu et al. Phys. Rev. C 81, 054317 (2010)

X. X. Xu et al. Phys. Rev. C82, 064316 (2010)

No obvious 2He emission!

Page 47: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.
Page 48: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.
Page 49: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.
Page 50: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.
Page 51: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

summary:

1. Both the elongated shape with small orientation angle at low energies and the large angular momentum partial waves at high energies lead to the quasi-fission (fusion hindrance). The contributions of fusion-fission and quasi-fission fragments are comparable.

2. The positive Q-value multi-neutron transfer really enhances the fusion cross section besides the couplings to the low inelastic states at sub-barrier energy region for 32S+96Zr system. But the transfer mechanism remains unknown.

Page 52: Studies of Heavy Ion Reactions around Coulomb Barrier Part I. Competition between fusion-fission and quasi- fission in 32 S+ 184 W reaction Part II. Sub-barrier.

3. For near-spherical systems, both single-channel and coupled-channels calculations give almost the same diffuseness parameters. The coupling effect is negligible. But For well-deformed systems, coupling effect is important. Coupled-channels calculations give smaller diffuseness parameters than the single-channel calculations and a better fitting to the experimental data.

4. Resolving the different threshold anomaly behaviors between 9Be+208Pb and 9Be+209Bi. It shows the breakup threshold anomaly.

5. It is found that 2He emission exists in the excited state of 29S but sequential proton emission in 28P and sequential alpha emission in 18Ne .

Challenge:

comprehensive description of the dynamical processes in the reactions!


Recommended