+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Date post: 13-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: emma-pattenden
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Journal for Studio Air 2013
Popular Tags:
33
Studio Air Emma Pattenden 538386 2013 Tuturs Alex Wilson David Lister
Transcript
Page 1: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Studio AirEmma Pattenden

538386

2013

Tuturs

Alex Wilson

David Lister

Page 2: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

“architecture needs to be thought of less as a set of special material products and rather more as a range of social and proffesional practices that sometimes, but by no means always, lead to buildings.”2

Page 3: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Con

tent

s

A Letter From Me

Part A Case for Innovation

Architecture as a Discourse

Computational Design

Olafur Eliasson

Algorithmic Exploration

Nature Boardwalk at Lin-coln Park Zoo

Conclusion

Parametric Design

References

1

5

11

15

23

17

25

27

29

Page 4: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

1

Page 5: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

My name is Emma Pattenden and I am currently studing in my third year of environments, majoring in archi-tecture. After finishing high school I moved down to Melbourne from the Blue Mountains near Sydney. Before starting my studies as an architect I ex-plored a variety of different study areas trying to find where my passion lied and what path I wanted to take. Firstly I undertook a year of fashion design at TAFE, where I discovered a passion for design and the applied arts. After real-izing I loved the concept of design, but not in the clothing industry, I under-took a year of engineering to assist me in getting into architecture.

A L

ette

r Fr

om M

e

I enjoyed the mathematical side of engineering but found it too restrict-ing on my artistic side.

Throughout these years of study I also did a lot of travelling( I think I may have an addiction). In my travels I have mainly returned to Europe over and over again. Traveling back to there has strengthened my love for architec-ture. Throughout my life I have always had a strong interest in Architecture, but it was not until I had experienced other study areas and seen more of the world that I realized that architecture was where my passion is, and it is what I want to follow as my career.

Page 6: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

3

Page 7: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

During my studies at the Univer-sity of Melbourne I have had a basic introduction to the use of computers as a design tool. This was primarily through studying Virtual Design in my first semester, where we began to ex-plore parametric designs through the use of rhino. I used this programming to have create an organic form that grew out from the neck, using barna-cles as my precedents.

I found the use of computers quite challenging and I personally enjoy de-signing with a pencil more, so I have mainly steered clear of continuing with parametric designs. Additionally

for me, I find developing designs with a pencil creates a more personal and intimate relationship with your pro-ject.

Although in saying this, I am look-ing forward to learning grasshopper and designing with it as I believe it will assist in broadening my concepts and how I visualize architectural forms. I am hoping by the end of the course I will take away confident skills in the program and a strong digital project to add to my portfolio.

4

Page 8: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden
Page 9: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Arc

hit

ectu

re a

s a

Dis

cour

se

Part

A

Cas

e fo

r Inn

ovat

ion

Page 10: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

In recent years architectural dis-course has been led by the develop-ments of computational design. Using computers more strongly within the process broadens our abilities to de-velop and construct forms and spaces previously unattainable due to cost and design restrictions. Architectural discourse has also started to revolve around the impression and emotions evoked in the public and community when experiencing a space. It has be-gun to consider the way each individu-al will experience and activate a space. This has led to developing and con-structing spaces due to the way people interact with each other and an area, rather than defining a space or area due to its functionality. Architecture is in the public realm and therefore has social implications through the way it frames our lives, developing a visual culture.3

The Studio Air looks into the way architecture creates discourse by provoking thinking and motivation within the audience through formal gestures. It contextualizes the way an audience experiences art, the way in which each person sees different signs and symbols and how they evoke vary-ing reactions across the public due to their life experiences. Developing an aesthetic experience that will continue to challenge and surprise us, and not allowing us to become desensitized to the experience as we encounter it more and more.3 It is not about mak-ing a ‘building’, but about using ideas and concepts to shape and transpire a form.

The developments and ideologies in architecture are stepping away from the traditional typology and are mov-ing away from the monumental and institutionalized concepts. Instead of having a building represent timing, space and the intentions of the crea-tor, the architectural form now has the ability to change and reform through time, adjusting to new environments, either through movement or by

Research Pavilion 2010, it ex-plores the materiality of the wood, and the way in which we can ap-ply it. Evolving a new experience of how we normally visualize and use these materials. It tests and displays the performance of the materials, which is done with ‘rap-id prototyping’ within the digital world before being brought out for physical construction.6 This pro-cess enables the fabrication of a form that previously was not pos-sible to construct. This allows for further developments in future de

A responsive surface structure. The top image show the closed off form during higher levels of humidity. As the air dries the wood changes its composition causing it to curl and create windows through the form.4

In recent years architectural dis-course has been led by the devel-opments of computational design, enabling our design parameters to broaden our abilities to develop and construct forms and spaces previously unattainable due to cost and design restrictions. Architec-tural discourse has also started to revolve around the impression and emotions evoked in the public and community. Considering the way each individual will experience and activate a space. This has led to developing and constructing spaces due to the way people in-teract with each other and an area, rather than defining a space or area due to its functionality. Archi-tecture is in the public realm and therefore has social implications through the way it frames our lives, developing a visual culture.3

The Studio Air looks into the way architecture creates discourse by provoking thinking and motiva-tion within the audience through formal gestures. It contextualizes the way an audience experiences art, the way in which each person sees different signs and symbols and how they evoke varying reac-tions across the public due to their life experiences. Developing an aesthetic experience that will con-tinue to challenge and surprise us, and not allowing us to become de-sensitized to the experience as we encounter it more and more.3 It is not about making a ‘building’, but about using ideas and concepts to shape and transpire a form.

The developments and ideolo-gies in architecture are stepping

away from the traditional and typical typology, moving away from the monumental and insti-tutionalized concepts. Instead of having a building represent tim-ing, space and the intentions of the creator, the architectural form has the ability to change and re-form through time adjusting to new environments, either through movement or by changes with-in the surrounding environment.

This is seen in the passive design FAZ Pavillion, Frankfurt (2010). This is a nurb surface that is en-tirely climate responsive, it allows one to experience an architectural space through the convergence of the man-made and the natural en-vironment.4 It shows how the com-bination of research and computer design has enabled such a space to exist. The combination of wood and computers sees the converging of one of the oldest building mate-rials with computational design.

The moisture in the air chang-es the dynamics within the wood causing a change in its dimension, having the geometric surface go from a straight panel to a curved.4 This effect will constantly change the surface of the form and ena-ble a new experience for the au-dience, and allowing them to ex-perience the form change shape, almost as if it is a living organism.

Parametric design allows one to make a freeflowing form. It configures a shape that ultimate-lymakes one feel comfortable as it is not a disjunction of objects, lines and shapes. In the ICD/ITKE

The finite ele-ment analysis (FEA) of the 2010 pavil-lion in Stuttgart. The computaional design model is run though the comput-er program to work out its exacct pos-tioning on site, dis-playing the tension and forces within the structure.5

A responsive surface struc-ture. The top image shows the closed form during higher levels of humidity. As the air dries the wood changes its composition, causing it to curl and create win-dows.4

7

Page 11: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

changes within the surrounding envi-ronment.

The architectural discourse in computational and parametric design is the reason behind choosing it as a tool to create the installation/sculptur-al work for the Wyndam City gateway design project. Wyndam city is look-ing for a project that will constantly encourage interaction between the artwork and the audience, not having it become stagnant. It will enrich the area with a strong visual and cultural design. The use of the computational design process will enable an extended period of time in which the designer will be able to play with the patterning and shape of the model, giving it time to develop to an appropriate shape and form for the site.

This is seen in the passive design FAZ Pavillion, Frankfurt (2010). This is a nurb surface that is entirely climate responsive, it allows one to experience an architectural space through the convergence of the man-made and the natural environment.4 It shows how the combination of research and com-puter design has enabled such a space to exist. The combination of wood and computers sees the converging of one of the oldest building materials with computational design.

The moisture in the air changes the dynamics within the wood causing a change in its dimension, having the geometric surface go from a straight panel to a curved.4 This effect will constantly change the surface of the form and enable a new experience for the audience, almost as if it is a living organism.

Parametric design allows one to make a free flowing form. It configures a shape that ultimately makes one feel comfortable as it is not a disjunction of objects, lines and shapes. In the ICD/ITKE Research Pavilion 2010, it ex-plores the materiality of the wood, and the way in which we can apply it.

The finite element analysis (FEA) of the 2010 pavillion in Stuttgart. The computational design model is run through the computer program to work out it’s exact postitioning on the site, and how this will efect the forces applied to the materials.5

8

Page 12: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

9

Page 13: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Evolving a new experience of how we normally visualize and use these materials. It tests and displays the per-formance of the materials, which is done with ‘rapid prototyping’ within the digital world before being brought out for physical construction.6 This process enables the fabrication of a form that previously was not possible to construct. This allows for further developments in future designs pro-cess as the combination of computers and humans continues to break down design barriers.

Both of the pavilions discussed al-low the audience to experience an ever

A responsive surface structure fabricated for the instalation project : Hygro-ScopeMeteorosensitive Mor-phology, in the Centre Pom-pidou, Paris, 2012. 7

changing experience of architec-ture as the forms interact with the au-dience and the environmental changes in the location due to light, shadow, air, temperature and the views it cre-ates. . The success of the way in which they have being developed, construct-ed, and then used, displays the way in which architecture is moving towards a design process with a stronger influ-ence and usage of computational de-sign.

10

Page 14: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden
Page 15: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Com

puta

tion

al D

esig

n

Part

A

Cas

e fo

r Inn

ovat

ion

Page 16: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

The development of computational design in architecture has shifted the creative process in which one would traditionally design an architectural form. It has driven the focus of design to the experimentation of the structur-al relationships and interconnections of shapes and symbols rather than the appealing form.8

Computational design is an explo-ration of the design process involv-ing computers. Through an interdis-ciplinary design approach it assists in defining parameters to develop an outcome. This interconnection of skill sets proceeds to formulate an array of potential design outcomes. The archi-tectural design field has re used tech-nology and methods from other indus-tries and applied it to the generative design process to stretch the abilities of humans, and to enable the growth and fabrication of the complex form. The borrowing of technologies from other industries supports these crea-tive designs, and ideas.9

Computational design has the de-signers put in the parameters of the external factors, focusing on its final performance value( a paradigm of problem solving).11 By inputting pa-rameters, it amplifies the goals of the project by strengthening complex as-pects of the form. The complex forms continue throughout the design, fab-rication and construction processes, giving it fluid connectivity.

Within a design space all solutions are available. It is a reality where you have the opportunity to explore and develop anything you desire, a vast amount of outcomes are available to you.9 External constraints and param-eters begin to direct you towards pos-sible solutions. The use of computers allows you to apply logical and algo-rithmic parameters and forces to the problem solving process within this space.

13

Page 17: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

An installation that uses this pro-cess is the VoltaDom by Skylar Tib-bits. The Installation is a tessellation of shapes that populate a corridor on the MIT campus. The assembly of forms gives a new spatial experience to the corridor, and challenges the way in which we experience the transitional space between rooms. The complex form puts a new twist on how we nor-malize a room, and gets one to question how we can manipulate these forms away from traditional concepts and into a more fluid intricate form. The computational design enables Skylar Tibbit’s to design a double curved sur-face panel and then have it fabricated for installation.

The combination of computers and humans involves the internal in-spiration and creativity from us, and a logical, analytical conclusion from the computers to break down the ex-ternally imposed constraints.11 This is where architectural design comes from, constraints and inspiration. Now the development in computers allows architects to engage and communicate with the models as the design becomes more abstract,11 by expanding access to information within the process of discovery. It has allowed the explora-tion of alternative design conclusions by the representation of an array of ideas by using this design process to

capture complex aspects of design. This has resulted in seeing a growth in organic geometric forms in architec-ture, returning to the representation of the natural form.8 It has opened up a gateway to complex forms which were originally “difficult to conceive, devel-op and represent.” 8

But this is not our final solution to the design process in the architec-tural realm. Looking through history you see how the process is constantly changing. It is not stagnant. It is an ongoing search for a solution. Pushing to explore further options, which have us testing our abilities to develop new conceptual representations of space and how we perceive it. The design process through computational design exceeds our abilities and enables us to become more dynamic with our solu-tions the problems we explore through the design space.11

Inside the VoltaDom by Skylar Tibbits.10

14

Page 18: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Nature Boardwalk at Lincoln Park Zoo

The South Pond Pavilion by the Studio Gang Architects is an example of a structural and a tessalation com-putational design. This project inter-ested me as it uses a repetition of one shape to make a complex and intricate spatial experience. The structure is made from a lattice of bent wood with fiber glass shells along the top. This provides the audience with the view of the parklands, while being protected from the sun and the rain during the day and the night.

The transition of the pavilions vis-ual impact from day to night is quite exciting. As the night comes on, the pavilion begins to glow, as if it is com-ing alive. I find the imagery of it dur-ing the night quite moving and more aesthetically pleasing as it illuminates the fluid shape and the lighting chang-es the form through the shadowing along the curves.

Throughout the weeks leading up to Studio Air I have taken an interest in having a pattern that uses light and shadowing to change and manipulate my project, having the gateway become an active system of parametric design. The use of lighting is a design outcome I will be considering to implement in my work once I begin to work within my group.

15

Page 19: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

16

Page 20: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden
Page 21: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Para

met

ric

Des

ign

Part

A

Cas

e fo

r Inn

ovat

ion

Page 22: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Parametric modelling offers de-signers a new medium to model. Fa-cilitating a new way to explore design, which is generated through an explicit connection between parameters and their geometry. This new way of de-sign expression brings fresh ideas and new ways of exploring concepts in the architectural field. It also has the de-signer rework the way in which they develop their designs; this is due to the deferral. The deferral is the way in which the final outcome (form) and placement of a model is put on hold till a later point in the design process. This is because parametric design is in relation to the graphing between nodes and how they network with each other. The data given to the nodes via functions and algorithms allows the manipulation to the coordinates to be much more rapid and easy.14

This gives the parametric model a dynamic form, allowing one to ex-plore how the models can rapidly change, seeing the different methods of representation. This design process gives the architect more time to find a contemporary expression to a design brief.14

This development has led to a non-static design environment, as the architect is able to manipulate and change the conditions of the project at

different stages. When designing, the parameters have to still be flexible to enable this play with the form. These components of the parametric design allows for adjustments to the model so it can adapt and mould to the environ-ment it will be placed in.15

An example of where this has be-ing applied is in the installation work ‘Dermoid’ by the Center for Informa-tion Technology and Architecture (CITA) and Spatial Information Archi-tecture Laboratory (SIAL). This group workshop was a research project into how computation can bring new ma-terial practices into architecture. The group of researchers and students used both computers and physical testing to probe the possibilities of the material. The use of computers in the paramet-ric design enabled the final shape of the model not to be completely final-ized to a few days before the construc-tion, showing the flexibility given to architects with this new way of design development.16

As the use of parametric model programs is like a language, communi-cation between the computer and the designer needs to be clear and concise, otherwise steps can be ‘lost in transla-tion’.

Configuring parametric models

19

Page 23: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

The finished result of the Dermoid work-shop 2011. 17

20

Page 24: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

A detail of one of the connections in the 2011 Dermoid. 18

21

Page 25: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

involves mathematical thinking, as the programs are set off mathematical propositions. Math’s has been a part of architecture throughout history; from the geometric proportions in the gothic churches to the golden ratio in Le Corbusiers designs. Computational design programs such as grasshopper are just a new medium in which the designer can use mathematics to for-mulate their design intent.14

An issue with this is that designers do not necessarily think mathemati-cally, they generally use computational programs to the extent of their skill set. Also the way in which they

organize and layout there algorithms can be more complex and harder to read by others, which again takes us back to the need for communication, as it can become difficult for others to work on the same project. It is impor-tant to take on a mathematical mindset as it enables the designers to organize the algorithms in the right hierarchy.14

The mathematical mindset has led to architects starting to formulate their own plug-ins for computational pro-grams. They have seen the potential and outcomes of the parametric design process and it has resulted in further exploration in this design dominion. 15

22

Page 26: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Olafur Eliasson is an artist that uses parametric and computational design methods to produce his artworks. His installation works play with the audi-ence’s perception of space and have them experience and view the world with a new and different perspective. His works evoke ideas and inspire cre-ativity. His works create a sense of ex-citement through his manipulation of light and forms, challenging our tradi-tional views of how we interact and ex-perience the world. Some of his works almost induce a meditative state when physically experiencing his works.

One work in particular that comes to mind is One-way colour tunnel, 2007, from the exhibition Take your time. This installation is a passageway of colour structured by a tessellation of geometric forms. Depending on the direction approaching the tunnel, the colours will change, delivering an un-predictable ever-changing experience to the audience. I believe this project optimizes the use of parametric design as it is a smaller project so doesn’t be-come overwhelming. The installation takes us back to the discourse and the basis of the air studio by stimulating and motivating the audience, building a spatial experience that motivates ac-tion and ideas.

Olafur Eliasson

23

Page 27: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

One-way Colour Tun-nel.

19. http : / /w w w.in-teractivearchitecture.org/olafur-eliasson-mca-sydney.html/screen-shot-2009-12-30-at-19-43-34

24

Page 28: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

25

Page 29: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Alg

orit

hm

ic E

xplo

rati

ons

Part

A

Cas

e fo

r Inn

ovat

ion

I have chosen these algorithmic ex-plorations as I think the methods used to get these shapes could be applicable when I am looking into my tessellation design for the gateway. The second im-age with the attracter points could be used to have the tessellation change shape and size across the surface, giv-ing a sense of movement to the sculp-ture. The third image is a solid form that has become more relaxed and less ridged which could be used as a sur-face to work on (in a different shape of course).

With my extended research I start-ed to combine techniques from differ-

ent tutorials to make shapes and pat-terns, which is seen in the corkscrew shape I made in the first image. These images shown will provide me with a base for further research in the design space within rhino and grasshopper to develop a parametric model for the Wyndam City gateway design project.

Page 30: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

27

Page 31: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

Con

clus

ion

Part

A

Cas

e fo

r Inn

ovat

ion

Parametric design is an exciting field in architecture that has provided architects a chance to explore design mathematically through a new medi-um. It allows for a development of free form unrigged sculptural spaces that inspire and challenge the audience’s perspective and opinion of architec-ture.

The modelling breaks down the barrier between art and architecture as the architects are able to explore the patterning and connections of their model before forming it into an interactive space. Computational and parametric design enables the func-tionality of spaces and the way people use them to define the shape and form of a structure taking us back to the idea of Richard Williams definition of architecture: “architecture needs to be thought of less as a set of special material products and rather more as range of social and professional prac-tices that sometimes, but by no means always, lead to buildings.”

Through my research I have seen the use of parametric designs with-in architecture and other fields that provide outcomes to design briefs that challenge ideas of formation and structure.

Using grasshopper, I find the logic of it understandable and something I will know, as I am mathematically minded, but I still need to train myself to reach that clicking point. The ar-rangement of functions in the hierar-chies is logical to me. I still prefer the use of the traditional design process and using the pen and paper to devel-op my ideas, but it is a useful medium that will enable further exploration and experimentations in my works when I find the paper cannot satisfy what I want to show. Specifically when exploring the tessellation concept for the Wyndam City gateway design pro-ject.

With the use of Grasshopper it will enable a sculptural form to be mod-eled for the site that can be explored in depth. Using tessellation in the de-sign will display an intrinsic patterned formation that changes due to the per-spective you view it at and due to the natural lighting falling over the area. The design approach used for the gate-way will enable a form to be designed for the site via a reaction to the loca-tion, from natural formations, wind, light, movements and other elements affecting the area.

Page 32: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

29

Page 33: Studio Air- Emma Pattenden

The South Pond Pavilion by the Studio Gang Architects is an example of a structural compu-tational design. This project in-terested me as it uses a repetition of one shape to make a complex and intricate spatial experience. The structure is made from a lat-tice of bent wood with fiber glass shells along the top. This provides the audience with the view of the parklands, while being protected from the sun and the rain during the day and the night. The transi-tion of the pavilions visual impact from day to night is quite exciting. As the night comes on the pavil-ion begins to glow, as if it is com-ing alive. I find the imagery of it during the night quite moving and more aesthetically pleasing as it illuminates the fluid shape and changes the forms through the shadowing along the curves. Throughout the weeks leading up to Studio Air I have taken an in-terest in having a pattern that uses light and shadowing to change and manipulate my project, having the gateway become an active system of parametric design. It is a design outcome I will be considering how to involve in my works once I be-gin to work within my group.

Nature

Boardwalk

at Lincoln Park

Zoo

The South Pond Pavilion during the evening with the city of Chicago in the back-ground. 12

References8. Kolarevic, Branko, Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing (New York; Lon-

don: Spon Press, 2003), pp. 3 – 28

9. Woodbury, Robert F. and Andrew L. Burrow (2006). ‘Whither design space?’, Artificial Intelli-gence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 20 , 2, pp. 63-82

10. http://architecture.mit.edu/architectural-design/project/voltadom-fast

11. Yehuda E. Kalay, Architecture’s New Media : Principles, Theories, and Methods of Comput-er-Aided Design (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004), pp. 5 – 25

12. http://www.studiogang.net/work/2005/lincolnparkzoo_urbandesign

signs process as the combination of computers and humans contin-ues to break down design barriers.

Both of the pavilions discussed allow the audience to experience an ever changing experience of architecture as the forms interact with the audience and the envi-ronmental changes in the location due to light, shadow, air, tempera-ture and the views it creates. The design process of these paramet-ric designs allows one to inter-act with each other in the spaces created. The success of the way in which they have being developed, constructed then used, displays the way in which architecture is moving towards a more compu-tational design, using precedents from the natural environment.

1. Julian Leinhard, Research Pavilion ICD/ITKE 2010 Interior view, from Interview with Julian Lienhard, Digital Crafting 5 Seminar, 2010, http://www.digitalcrafting.dk/?p=2204

2. Richard Williams. ‘Architecture and Visual Culture’, in Exploring Visual Culture: De�nitions, Con-cepts, Contexts, ed. by Matthew Rampley (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005), pp. 102-116, p. 108

3. Richard Williams, ‘Architecture and Visual Culture’, Exploring Visual Culture : Definitions, Con-cepts, Contexts, ed. by Matthew Rampley (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005), pp. 102 - 116

4. Achim Menges and Steffen Reichert, ‘Material Capacity, Embedded Responsiveness’, Architectur-al Design, vol. 82, no. 2, 2012, pp. 52-59

5. Julian Lienhard, Illustration, from Teaching by Doing: A Research Pavilion in Stuttgart, 2010, http://www.detail-online.com/architecture/topics/teaching-by-doing-a-research-pavilion-in-stutt-gart-007367.html

6. Achim Menges, ‘Material Computation, Higher Integration in Morphogenetic Design’, Architec-tural Design, vol. 82, no. 2, 2012, pp.14-21

7. Achim Menges, HygroScope: Meteorosensitive Morphology, 2012, http://www.looksfeelsworks.com/category/sciene/

A responsive surface struc-ture fabricated for the instal-lation project: HygroScope - Meteorosensitive Morphology, in the Centre Pompidou, Paris, 2012.7

References

Ref

eren

ces

Part

A

Cas

e fo

r Inn

ovat

ion

grasshopper is a new medium in which the designer can use math-ematics in.14

As designers don’t necessarily think mathematically, they will still generally use computational programs to the extent of their skill set and will borrow other codes to reuse in their design. Also as they do not work in the same mindset as programmers the way in which they organize and layout there al-gorithms can be more complex and harder to read by others, which again takes us back to the need for communication, as it can become difficult for others to come in and work on a the same project with-out having full knowledge of the layout. It is important to take on the mathematical mind as it ena-bles the designer to organize the algorithms in the right hierarchy.14

Architects have started to for-mulate their own plug-ins for com-putational programs. They have seen the potential and outcomes of the parametric design process and it has resulted in them exploring further in this design dominion.15

computers in the parametric de-sign enabled the final shape of the model not to be completely final-ized to a few days before the con-struction, showing the flexibility given to architects with this new way of design development. 16

As the use of parametric model programs is like a language, com-munication between the computer and the designer needs to be clear and concise, otherwise steps can be ‘lost in translation’.

Configuring parametric models involves mathematical thinking, as the programs are set off math-ematical propositions. Although mathematical thinking is seen as a required skill in using these pro-grams, math’s has been a part of architecture throughout history; from the geometric proportions in the gothic churches to the use of the golden ratio, the modular, by Le Corbusier. This just shows how math’s is being used as a tool in de-sign is nothing new, and computa-tional design programs such as

References13. Florence & Lavender, Olafur Eliasson, Inverted Berlin Sphere, 2005, mixed media, 2011, http://

florenceandlavender.wordpress.com/2012/01/13/art-basel-miami-beach-2011/

14. Robert Woodbury, Elements of Parametric Design, (London: Routledge, 2010) pp. 7-48

15. Daniel Davis & Brady Peters, Design Ecosystems, From Architectural Design, vol 83, issue 2, 2013, pp 124-131

16. CITA, Dermoid Workshops, from Center for Information Technology and Architecture, viewed: 26/3/11, http://cita.karch.dk/Menu/Courses/2010-11+Dermoid+Workshops/Dermoid+Workshops

17. Martin Tamke, CF035741, 2011, viewed 26/3/13, http://www.flickr.com/photos/89102692@N00/5690745323/

18. Martin Tamke, CF035942, 2011, viewed 26/3/13, http://www.flickr.com/photos/89102692@N00/5690745323/

A detail of one of the connections in the 2011 Dermoid 18


Recommended