+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Study of B and B D · B Motivation m l leads to Helicity suppression: I f B: B-meson decay...

Study of B and B D · B Motivation m l leads to Helicity suppression: I f B: B-meson decay...

Date post: 24-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
24
Study of B and BD ( * ) Matthew Barrett Brunel University – HEP Group School of Engineering and Design On Behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Presented at
Transcript
  • Study of B and BD(*)Matthew Barrett

    Brunel University – HEP GroupSchool of Engineering and Design

    On Behalf of the BaBar Collaboration

    Presented at

  • Outline● Recoil Technique● B ● BD(*)● Summary

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 2

  • Experiment

    e+

    e–

    SVT – Silicon Vertex Tracker

    1.5T Magnet

    DIRC – Detector of Internally Reflected Cherenkov radiation

    DCH – Drift CHamber

    EMC – Electromagnetic Calorimeter

    IFR – Instrumented Flux Return

    ● e+e– collisions: ECM

    = 10.58GeV (Y(4S) Mass).

    433 fb–1 4S data

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 3

  • Recoil Technique● Lack of kinematic

    constraints: 2 or 3 neutrinos in final state.

    ● Fully Reconstruct otherB (B

    reco): constrain Bsignal.

    ● Two methods – “Tags”:● Hadronic: B

    recoD(*)X

    – X= hadrons (, K, 0, Ks).

    ● Semileptonic: BrecoDlX

    – X = 0, nothing. (assume 1 missing) Fully Reconstruct08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 4

  • Recoil Technique● The is reconstructed

    in 4 modes in B.

    – ee

    ● Accounts for ~70% of decays.● Only Leptonic decays used in BD

    Fully Reconstruct08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 5

  • B

  • B Motivation●

    ● ml leads to Helicity suppression:

    I● fB: B-meson decay constant.

    − Accessible: purely leptonic decays.− fB = 0.216 0.022 GeV from lattice QCD.

    ● Vub

    : CKM matrix element: |Vub| = (4.31 0.30) 10

    –3.

    ● SM predictions: B(B) = (1.6 0.4) 10–4.B(B) = (0.85 0.14) 10–4. (Vub, no lattice)

    Phys.Rev.Lett.95, 212001 (2005)

    PDG2006

    : : e1 : 510–3 : 10–7

    wb

    u

    _ _

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 7

  • B Motivation● Beyond the SM:● Extra diagram from Charged

    Higgs.● Modified Branching fraction in

    Two Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM):

    ● mH – charged Higgs Mass.

    ● tan – ratio of v.e.v. of 2HD.

    W.S.Hou PRD 48 2342 (1993)

    wb

    u

    _ _

    Hb

    u

    _ _

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 8

  • B Hadronic Analysis● Uses 383 106 BB pairs.● Likelihood fit to yield in

    4 channels.●

    ● EExtra

    sum of unattributed energy in Calorimeter.

    Phys.Rev.D77:011107, 2008arXiv:0708.2260 [hep-ex]

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 9

  • B Semileptonic Analysis● Uses 383 106 BB pairs.● Likelihood fit to yield in

    4 channels.●

    ● EExtra

    sum of unattributed energy in Calorimeter.

    Phys.Rev.D76:052002, 2007arXiv:0705.1820 [hep-ex]

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 10

  • Belle B Results● 449 106 BB pairs● Hadronic Tags (B D(*)0[, , a

    1, D

    s]).

    ● Using HFAG Vub:

    PRL 97, 251802 (2006)

    (3.5

    mode

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 11

  • B Results● BaBar: Two tags – statistically independent.● Combine – Likelihood fit to 8 channels● (2.6● Belle hadronic analysis:●

    ● UTfit combined value:● B(B) = (1.41 0.43) 10–4.

    a● NB BaBar and Belle values above include

    charge conjugate modes.

    http://www.utfit.org

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 12

  • Standard Model constraints● Combine with m

    d:

    – B0 mass difference.– fB cancels.

    – ratio of CKM elements:|V

    ub| and |V

    td|.

    – UT constraint.

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 13

  • Constraints on New Physics● Constraint on Charged

    Higgs Mass.●

    ● Shown above LEP direct search limit.

    ● Combine with results frombs. B + bs.

    B

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 14

  • BD(*)

  • BD(*) Motivation● Many Semileptonic B decays observed:● But those with a – experimentally challenging.● Branching fractions can be accurately predicted:

    ● 4 Channels to be studied

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 16

    JHEP 0610, 053 (2006)Phys. Lett. B 326 145 (1994)

  • BD(*) Motivation● Beyond SM – charged Higgs.● Higgs couples to mass – larger

    effect than in BD(*)l● Ratio of

    B(BDBBDlfor MSSM (l = e, ).

    mW/m

    H tan

    hep-ph/0109244

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 17

  • BD(*) Analysis● Uses 232106 BB pairs.● Hadronic tags used.● Flavour correlation between

    D(*) and Breco

    .

    ● Reconstruct 4 D channels:D*+, D*0, D+, D0

    ● Most discriminating variable mmiss

    2

    ● Simultaneous fit to all channels.● BF normalised with respect to D(*)l

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 18

  • BD(*) ResultsLegend

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 19

  • BD(*) Results

    Belle● 535106 BB pairs.● reconstructed as e,

    and .●

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 20

    (3.6(6.2

    PRL 100 021801(2008)hep-ex/0709:1698

    Xmis

    – closely related to Mmiss

    .E

    vis – visible energy.

    signal

    background

    arXiv:0706.4429[hep-ex] (5.2

    statonly

  • Summary● Leptonic and semi-leptonic B decays involving s are

    experimentally challenging.● But provide exciting prospects for observing new

    physics effects, including charged Higgs.

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 21

  • Backup Slides

  • Charged Higgs Exclusion

    08 June 2008 Matthew Barrett – Brunel University 24


Recommended