India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
1 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Subject: History
Lesson: India in the mid-eighteenth century: society,
economy, polity
Course Developers
The eighteenth century: an overview
Lakshmi Subramanian
and
The eighteenth century: society,economy and polity
Partho Datta
Language Editor: Swapna Liddle
Formating Editor: Ashutosh Kumar
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
2 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Table of contents
Chapter 1: India in the mid eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
1.1: The eighteenth century – an overview
1.2: The eighteenth century: society, economy and polity
Summary
Exercises
Glossary
Further readings
Introduction
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
3 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
The 18th century occupies an interesting position in the history of India. In recent years, it
has also emerged as a major site of debate and deliberations among historians. The reasons
for this are many. As a century that witnessed the passing away of an empire (the Mughal)
and its replacement by another (the British), it was viewed and described in very different
ways by contemporary observers, commentators and participants. For chroniclers of the
declining Mughal Empire, (Moving map to be inserted) the century represented a period of
political and cultural loss – of profound transformation that was likened to a revolution, an
inqilab, that could only be expressed in poems of lament or shahr e ashob.
Value addition: did you know?
Poetry of the declining Mughals
The genre of Urdu poetry known as shahr ashob (literally the city‟s misfortune) gives
us a personalized account of individual reactions to the period of Mughal decline in
the 18th century. Two major poets specializing in this genre were MirTaqi Mir (1724-
1810) and Mirza Rafi Sauda (1713-81) both of whom were old enough to feel the
trauma of Nadir Shah‟s attack on Delhi, the imperial city. The pain and privations of
the city and its residents who faced shortages, hardships and exactions formed the
subject matter of a lot of the poetry. Recall how Sauda writes:
“The Income from jagirs is all but cut off now.
For years the country has been at the pleasure of outlaws and renegades.
He who was once sole lord of twenty two subas
Can‟t even retain the faujdari of Kol.
Those in the country are strong and seditious, what amirs there are feeble,
And those who detain us on the road are in cahoots with them, Their masters cannot
collect even a quarter of the harvest.”
For Mir, the world was never the same and even as he resided in Lucknow in relative
safety, he wrote:
“You would not know this age as you did the one before,
Mir,
It is not that age now, nor that earth or sky”
Source: Petievich, Carla R. 1990. „Poetry of the Declining Mughals: The Shahr
Ashob‟. Journal of South Asian Literature. Vol. XXV No. 1.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
4 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
For new comers and political aspirants, who were busy building smaller regional states and
political units, the century was one of opportunities that permitted a redistribution of
resources and produced contrasting and competing narratives of kingship, governance and
conflict. For the aspiring English East India Company that looked at every opportunity for
expansion and self-aggrandizement, the century had to be projected as one of instability
and decay giving them the necessary moral justification for conquest and subjugation. And
that was not all. There were regional histories in the vernacular being produced in the 18th
century and which indexed a new set of historical sensibilities and political change. These
multiple narratives make retrospective history writing difficult but are useful in yielding
valuable insights into the complexities of the social, political and cultural landscape of 18th
century India.
This lesson will attempt to track overall social change and its manifestations - political,
cultural and economic. We will also look at literary and cultural production, regional state
building, caste mobility and community formations and the changing balance of political
power buttressed by a redistribution of economic resources. Here the first question that we
will need to clarify is what we mean by social change. Evidently at one level, we are looking
at clearly identifiable processes that affected certain sections of society, altering their status
and resource base and with that, occasionally their political orientation or world view. Social
change in the 18th century came largely as a consequence of changing economic
circumstances in the wake of Imperial Mughal decline and one that generated new
possibilities for employment, profit and social mobility for some groups who were positioned
to take advantage of the new set up. The dismantling of the imperial Mughal edifice found
expression in the emergence of regional states headed by ex-Mughal grandees in some
cases and by new claimants in others.
Some historians like C. A. Bayly and Andre Wink have argued that the emergence of the
new states itself reflected the maturation of an earlier period of expansion and growth that
could not be contained within the faltering Mughal set up. In many cases, the beneficiaries
of the economic change became rulers themselves and in any case, along with others,
pursued policies of military expansion and bureaucratic centralization that had vital
consequences. One important result was the increasing deployment of new methods of
revenue extraction and management referred to by David Washbrook as „military fiscalism‟.
This referred to a policy of short-term revenue extraction to serve the overall objective of
maintaining armed forces by encouraging revenue farming instead of long-term investment
in productivity. This in turn benefited a range of groups, especially scribal, managerial
groups and holders of landed rights described by some historians as the „gentry‟, to come to
the forefront. In fact the military requirements of new regional states, especially in the
second half of the 18th century, Mysore, Hyderabad, Bengal and Awadh, operating a war
economy also brought European mercenary soldiers and adventurers whose presence in
18th century India added a colorful detail to its rich and vibrant tapestry of social life. The
association of adventurers with courts – Polier with Awadh, Marquis de Bussy with Arcot,
and de Boigne with Mahadji Sindhia, among others – reminds us of the hybridity and
cosmopolitanism of regional courts in 18th century India.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
5 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Figure 1.1.1: Benoit de Boigne
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beno%C3%AEt_de_Boigne
Figure 1.1.2: Col. Polier's Nautch (Lucknow, c.1780), painted by Mihr Chand
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00routesdata/1700_1799/polier/polier.html
Accommodation and adaptation, mobility and change, represent only one element in a
historical overview of social change. The other has to do with the genealogy of protest and
dissidence – of locating sources of unrest and resistance among those groups whose
position and status were threatened by the changes in the body politic. The 18th century
saw episodic rebellions in various parts of India breaking out during moments of famine,
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
6 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
political disruption and war. An overview of the century cannot afford to overlook these
moments of rupture and contestation and speculate on their implications for assessing the
18th century in the larger context of change and progression. At the same time, we will
need to consider the notion of early modernity, which is now emerging as a major research
concern among historians of 18th century India. Historians like Kumkum Chatterjee and
Sanjay Subrahmanyam look at historical productions of the 18th century to posit the idea of
an early modern conceptualization of history.
Social change and political economy
Tracking social change in 18th century India is no easy task. The first major stumbling block
is the size and diversity of the space that constituted India. This is followed by an incredibly
dense and mired structure of social relations even at the local level that make any large
generalizations impossible. For purposes of clarity and convenience, we will address the
issue of social change around the changing political economy of the period. We will be
looking at the century in two different temporal segments; the first half of the century that
saw regionalism being articulated in the form of actual political units and the following half
century that saw a progressive dismantling of the regimes by the English East India
Company. By political economy we mean here a commonsensical understanding of the
term, that is, the economies of polities and states, which were by and large geared to a war
economy that made necessary an efficient bureaucracy and an expanding army. These in
turn imposed immense pressure on state revenues forcing the administration to devise new
strategies to appropriate greater revenues and facilitate their circulation. Some of these
strategies benefited new and emerging social groups who became the movers and shakers
of power in the 18th century, financing wars, facilitating transfer of revenues and acquiring
increasing influence in the administration. Some of these groups went on to collaborate with
the English East India Company in the second half of the 18th century enabling the latter to
wrest political power and make a bid for paramountcy in Hindustan. On the other hand,
there were others whose resources were strained severely and who were barely in a
position to negotiate with the new dispensation.
Historians have begun to realize that the articulation of regionalism as a by-product of the
Mughal polity itself was not confined to the political domain. If the 1980‟s saw a proliferation
of region based studies that made a case for pockets of growth and social change and for
social tensions generated within the Mughal agrarian order, more recent scholarship has
focused attention on the tensions between the centre and the region expressed through the
vehicle of language. Muzaffar Alam‟s work on the political language of Islam in Mughal India
referred to both the tension between Persian and regional vernaculars and also the factors
that determined the choice of Persian as the language of politics and negotiation, as an
instrument of maneuverability and social management. The point that needs to be borne in
mind here, is how elements of early modernity and a secular polity were present in the late
Mughal set up and how in course of the 18th century, the epistemic frame of empire based
on Persian was showing signs of wear and tear caused by the assertion of regional
tendencies.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
7 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Social change and political economy of Hindustan in 1700: a bird‟s eye view
What would a hypothetical time traveler have found during his travels in India around the
first half of the 18th century and how would this have differed from his later counterpart at
the end of the period? A lot of course would have been determined by his/her location. The
view from Delhi would have been singularly bleak as the death of Aurangzeb in 1707 was
accompanied by the steady erosion of political authority in the centre and the articulation of
regional aspirations by ex-subadars and/or new members of the landed gentry. As senior
Mughal officials and rulers struggled to maintain hold over a deteriorating edifice, new
players drawn largely from the landed gentry and mobile peasant backgrounds with their
scribal collaborators emerged as the new bosses of the day. Successive onslaughts by the
Persians and the Afghans and their sack of the city in 1739 and 1761 respectively,
thoroughly destroyed the already paralyzed edifice of the Mughal state, which by this time
could boast only of a hollow carapace having yielded to the demands and aspirations of
regional leaders.
Between 1707 and 1761, regionalism became the dominant force in Indian politics;
everywhere from Bengal in the east to Gujarat in the west, from Punjab in the north to
Arcot and Mysore in the south, new aspirants, some ex Mughal grandees, some arrivistes
asserted their claims to power. Between these two dates, Bengal, Awadh and Hyderabad
had set themselves up as independent units, while during the same period two further
regimes were carved out to the north and east of Delhi by Afghan military adventurers – the
Rohillas and Bangash Afghans. If these states represented the vitality and enterprise of
disaffected Mughal nobles, who astutely solicited the cooperation of local power holders and
of mercenary adventurers respectively, there were others like the Marathas, Jats and Sikhs
whose politics embodied the interface between social movements, agrarian mobility and
political opportunity.
What do we mean by this interface? Typically, an interface indicates a crossing point for
different processes. Consequently, we can see economic growth or agricultural expansion
over a period of time can enable local rights holders to build up their reserves and improve
their political status and then challenge the very foundations of the political authority that
had sustained and supported their claims in the first place. Alternatively, there could be as
in the case of entities like the Marathas and Sikhs a convergence of land related aspirations
with social transformation based on ideology that persuaded and helped mobilize a range of
groups to stake claims to regional power. From the older perspective of the established
Mughal ruling class, the usurpation of political authority by subject populations was an
abhorrence that was to be condemned in the strongest possible terms. Historians of late
Mughal India gave vent to this – we have for instance, memoirists and chroniclers lamenting
the lapses in rule and the assertion of new groups whose politics was seen as an
abomination.
These laments reflected not merely a perceptible decline in governance and the resultant
political instability but the anxiety about the implications the imperial crisis had for the
older, familiar social balance that had once kept the body politic intact. Once the well-known
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
8 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
and familiar triad of ruler-magnate-peasant had been disrupted, the foundations of
governance were shaken as new aspirants and upstarts raced to make good their fortunes
in a time of troubles. This manifested in the form of regional dissociation from the imperial
centre, of regional polities mushrooming in Bengal, Awadh, Hyderabad, the Punjab and the
Deccan. Regionalism was largely buttressed by economic developments of the preceding
decades that had enabled a range of social groups with access to skills and capital to
emerge as power brokers if not power-holders. This group, often referred to as the gentry
by scholars like C. A. Bayly, embodied the changing pattern of resource distribution and the
consequences of the policy of military fiscalism that we have referred to in the context of
the new regional states of the 18th century. Responding to the need for building efficient
armies, regional states devised new mechanisms for revenue mobilization and extraction
and made use of new partners drawn from the commercial sections of the population. At the
same time there was a closer and deeper penetration into society with the help of an
expanding bureaucracy, a development that further reinforced the status and strength of
the mobile scribal and commercial groups of Indian society. The emergence and success of
Karanams in the south, Kayasths in Bengal and the Deccan, Chitpavan Brahmins and
Shenvis in the Konkan as much as the assertion of Bhumihars in Benaras as a consequence
of sustained agrarian colonization, epitomized the changing balance of social power in 18th
century India and one that occasionally destabilized older boundaries of caste and status.
Value addition: did you know?
The Rajapur Congress of 1664
In 1664, the small town of Rajapur in the Konkan witnessed a dharmasabha, a
gathering of pandits, convened by Shivaji to examine the standing of Shenvis a sub
group of the Saraswats. A mobile group, their advancement had become noticeable
thanks to the success they enjoyed in trade, landholding, revenue management and
local administration. Their success and claims to status raised questions on what
constituted a Brahmin. Was it diet, was it particular livelihoods? For the Rajapur
assembly the bone of contention was not that Shenvis ate fish but that they pursued
agriculture and associated activities that eroded Brahmanical status. These questions
of standing cropped up repeatedly after 1664, indicating two things; one that
communities were competing for certain kinds of advantages and secondly that a
series of local meanings could always be added to the archetypal figure of the
Brahmin. For us students and teachers of 18th century India, the most important
feature of social history seems to be mobility and how this disturbed and destabilized
existing social relations and conventions.
Source: Rosalind O‟Hanlon and Christopher Minkowski. 2008. „What makes people
who they are? Pandit networks and the problem of livelihoods in early modern
Western India‟. Indian Economic and Social History Review. 45, 3, 381-416.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
9 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Select case studies
Let us illustrate this point with a few concrete examples, some of which you will learn in
detail on another occasion. Take the case of Bengal where in course of the first half of the
18th century a vibrant regional polity emerged under Murshid Quli Khan (1713-27) and his
successors. Sent as subadar to Bengal by Emperor Aurangzeb and armed with instructions
to augment the region‟s revenue collections meant for the imperial treasury, Murshid Quli
ended up rehauling the entire administrative set up that not only stepped up the state‟s
revenue shares, but brought about a new social coalition. How did this happen?
Conventional wisdom speaks of three sets of reforms the administrator undertook, namely
the transfer of a substantial portion of land into direct crown held territory (khalsa),
streamlining collection procedures and investing the responsibility of revenue collection with
big zamindars who were capable of paying the enhanced revenue assessment. Those who
could not, and defaulted, lost their lands with the result that eventually more than two fifths
of Bengal‟s revenue was paid by a small group of about 30 influential zamindari houses. The
latter in turn worked with financiers who paid upfront the necessary revenue and even
undertook the important business of remitting revenues from Bengal to Delhi and assumed
a position of centrality in the set up. The best known among these merchant houses was the
house of Jagat Seth. (Box on Jagat Seth)
By eliminating small and middling zamindars and investing large landed houses with the
task of revenue collection, Murshid Quli‟s administration enjoyed greater vertical control
over society and aligned it more closely to the interests and concerns of the local elite and
merchant groups. His administration was also characterized by the growing preponderance
of Hindu scribal groups who manned the administration and who emerged as important
members of the literati well versed in Persian. This new arrangement worked well for more
than four decades; described by Philip Caulkins as a government by consent until it was de-
stablized by internal dissensions within the court in Murshidabad and the growing offensive
of the English East India Company based in Calcutta. We will have occasion to refer to this
in greater detail.
Growth of zamindari power as well as the growing participation of mercantile and scribal
groups in the running of the administrative and revenue collecting machinery was evident in
other successor states as well. In Hyderabad we have the instance of the emerging power of
the Kayasths, as record keepers and administrative assistants, whose rise according to
historian Karen Leonard, was an inevitable consequence of the policies of the newly created
Hyderabad state. Here was a case of a military aristocracy trying to keep a robust army
intact so as to further territorial expansion and to consolidate a bureaucracy that benefited
record keepers and scribal groups. In Awadh too, we have evidence of magnate power that
not only provided leadership to agrarian resistance against the Mughals during the closing
decades of the 17th century, but also built substantial holdings and even buttressed the
provincial administration‟s claims to autonomy from the Mughal centre.
A very different set of circumstances operated in the case of social movements translating
into political entities in the 18th century – a development that also testifies to the inherent
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
10 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
fluidity of the period that made it possible for a range of social groups to improve and
articulate their status. Ordinarily, opportunities for social mobility are made possible when
there is an expansion of economic opportunities or when there is a growing pressure on
territory – a land hunger that drives people to move out and thereafter, aspire to a higher
ascriptive caste status. Circumstances in the late 17th and 18th centuries worked to this
end at several levels. Here, we have the case of Sikhs, Jats and Marathas, whose numbers
were largely drawn from lower ranks of peasant and cultivating society as well as from
groups on the fringes of settled agriculture coming forward to support war-bands in search
of territory and cohering around a set of socially inclusive doctrines.
Starting off as a reaction to the dominance of revenue extractors in the Deccan, the
Marathas represented the coming of age of local co-sharers of revenue who used their
military service as a vantage point to claim a new and exalted status in the 17th century
and to enjoy certain vested rights in land. The term itself began to represent by the 17th
century a category of service elite drawn from diverse castes who in lieu of their military
service to Muslim sultanates in the Deccan began to enjoy both status and rights in land.
The formation of the category coincided with the rise of a social movement based on
inclusive bhakti that convulsed society in Maharashtra and gave an added fillip to the
aspirations of ordinary peasant cultivators to aspire to a new status that military service
promised. The conditions of Mughal decline in the first half of the 18th century encouraged
Maratha leaders to organize bands and carve out zones of influence far removed from their
original nucleus in the western Deccan. Between 1713 and 1761 when Maratha expansion
was checked by the forces of the Afghan king Ahmad Shah Abdali in the historic battle-fields
of Panipat, the power of the Maratha Confederacy as a major contender for paramountcy
was evident to any contemporary observer.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
11 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Figure 1.1.3: Maratha soldier
Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/Maratha_soldier.gif
A similar set of tendencies was evident in the case of Jat expansion and their embrace of
Sikhism, the other great social movement that appealed to commercial castes initially
butmoved robust itinerant groups as well as pioneer peasant castes like the Jats. Repeated
struggles against the Mughal administration became effective especially in the wake of the
Persian and Afghan invasions that destabilized the situation in the Punjab and the Northwest
enabling Sikh war-bands to occupy Lahore and in 1767 found the Patiala state. What united
all these regional units was the coalition of interests that developed between rulers and local
elite constituted by new and mobile groups, and the tendency towards bureaucratic
centralization assumed by the new rulers in their perennial search for revenues needed to
finance wars and expansion. Whether it was Alivardi Khan in Bengal or Martanda Varma in
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
12 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Travancore, or Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan in Mysore, the emphasis on bureaucratic
reorganization, rigorous taxation, and regulation of commerce and deployment of
mercenaries to maintain political control was apparent. It was therefore not entirely
coincidental that bankers and service castes everywhere should assume a position of
centrality in the fluid and dynamic state system of the 18th century – a development that
contributed very substantively to the crystallization of more caste cohesive identities.
If the origins of regional state building were to be found in conditions of growth and
redistribution of economic resources among more groups, the consolidation of these
regimes and the strategies deployed to achieve it ensured a new coalition of social classes,
in which the merchants, scribes and the landed gentry assumed a central position. The
process was however, short-lived as the regional state system came under pressure from
the second half of the 18th century when the English East India Company thanks to its
victory in Bengal in 1757 moved into a new position of competitive advantage in the
struggle for Hindustan.
Plassey and the transition to the Company Raj
The growing presence of the English East India Company and its steady assumption of
political power was the most visible feature of Indian politics in the half century following
Plassey. Beginning as a trading company that was able to manoeuvre for special privileges
from the Mughal empire and its representatives, usually in the form of imperial farmans for
customs exemption, the Company began to intervene as a mercenary force in the mediation
of succession disputes in the regional systems until 1757 when it made a conscious bid for
direct political authority and territorial control. This decision coincided with a crisis in the
political system of Bengal precipitated by the actions of the new Nawab Sirajuddaulah
against powerful members of the ruling elite. The unfolding of a conspiracy among the latter
fanned by the English East India Company cost the Bengal system its independence as a
farcical battle waged in the groves of Plassey was followed by a humiliating settlement
imposed on the chosen Nawab Mir Jafar that enabled the Company to steadily extend its
tentacles on the political economy of the region. Less than ten years later, a more decisive
battle was fought between the Company and Mir Qasim, the Nawab of Bengal who
attempted to resist the steady erosion of his authority. The contest of Buxar gave the
Company the right to revenue collection from the subas of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa and
armed thus with a huge revenue surplus, the Company was poised to make a bid for the
supremacy of Hindustan.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
13 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Figure 1.1.4: Clive and Mir Jafar after the battle of Plassey
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Clive.jpg
Between 1765 and 1818, the political history of India was marked by conflict and diplomatic
negotiations that finally put the Company in control over the subcontinent. The process of
domination was complex and chequered – a variety of strategies were deployed ranging
from subsidiary alliances to indirect rule to outright conquest and coercion. A situation of
endemic conflict inevitably put pressure on the regional states that were forced to rely more
and more on what we have referred to as a policy of military fiscalism. The tightening of the
bureaucracy, the rampant spread of revenue farming that made both for quick turn over as
well as pressure on the cultivators and the intercession of mobile commercial groups with
capital in the financing of war and politics emerged as the most distinguishing marks of
transition politics in the second half of the 18th century. Bankers were indeed the cement
that kept the ties of circulation in place and it was also their collaboration that enabled the
Company to score a march over its rivals. The need for remittance facilities to finance war
operations in widely dispersed zones of conflict meant that the hundis of Indian bankers like
Gopaldas Manohardas, or Hari Bhakti and Tarwady Arjunjee Nathjee became critical
determinants of success and failure. The war economy also created a demand for new
commodities and helped in the emergence of a nexus between revenue, trade and
distribution.
If merchants were key figures in transition politics, mercenaries were no less important in
the political ecology of 18th century India. The conditions of a war economy brought in
among other things a train of European adventurers and mercenary soldiers, who
introduced new technologies of warfare and who were equally adept at integrating into the
Persianized political culture of late Mughal India. Some of them like Polier and Kirkpatrick or
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
14 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Palmer, opted for an „Orientalized‟ life style, learnt Indian languages especially Persian,
entertained liaisons with local women and became part of a new hybrid temperament that
characterized the century. The presence of European military adventurers and missionaries
in courts as residents or advisers contributed to the cultural richness of the century when in
fact in the domains of art and music there was a marked efflorescence that stood in contrast
to the political convulsions.
Figure 1.1.5: James Achilles Kirkpatrick
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:James_Achilles_Kirkpatrick.jpg
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
15 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Figure 1.1.6: Khair-un-Nissa, a Hyderabadi noblewoman and wife of James Achilles
Kirkpatrick
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Khair-un-Nissa.jpg
A social revolution
Can we on the basis of the above survey of political change and its supporting economy,
make a definitive formulation about the changing social landscape in 18th century India and
if we do, which classes would we be looking at? Clearly we have evidence indicating the
assertion and visibility of scribal and commercial groups and of the landed gentry in some
parts who benefited from Mughal peace and asserted their autonomy in the 18th century.
How did this success find reflection in terms of status and identity? Susan Bayly in an
important work on caste and society in India argues that the dynamism of regional state
systems in the wake of Mughal decline helped in the crystallization of caste identities and
ideals and which were subsequently consolidated under British rule. Historians like Sanjay
Subrahmanyam and Kumkum Chatterjee have shown more recently how the articulation of
a scribal culture produced new modes of writing history that marked an important break
with older traditions of chronicling and reflected a new sense of historical awareness. The
rich cultural mix of Persianized ideals and of Brahmanical tradition was especially evident in
Bengal. Here the Persianate attainments of the Bengali gentry were remembered with pride
and élan even as there was a renewed interest in patronizing Hindu rituals and in the
adherence of Sanskritic/Brahmanical culture.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
16 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
What stands out in terms of social transformation is the mobility that was available to a
variety of enterprising groups to make good in the times. Warrior lineages, peasant-
cultivators assuming the status of Bhumihars and Jats and Marathas, bankers and scribes
who participated in the Persianized political culture even as they were moving towards a
more systematic caste identity clearly emerge as the principal actors of the century. It was
also in course of the 18th century that there was what Vijay Pinch refers to as the
crystallization of a new phase of armed asceticism embodied by the rise of Gosains as major
mercenary soldiers and recruiters as well as traders and money lenders. The changes
wrought in the military labour market of Northern India by the English east India Company
as well as successor states reinforced caste identities for example – by joining the Company
army, many of the social castes hoped to realize their aspirations of upward mobility.
It is possible to inter-relate social turbulence and transformation with religious expressions ;
Pinch observes how even after the subjugation of the Gosains, their organizations continued
to have important social functions revealed most obviously in their control of the Kumbh
pilgrimage held triennially in Hardwar, Allahabad, Nasik and Ujjain. Muslim religious life both
in Delhi and elsewhere revolved around new and more rigorous conceptions of fidelity to the
Hadith or the sayings of the prophet. In Delhi Shah Waliullah the Naqshbandi Sufi (1703-62)
led an important scholarly circle and whose teachings found a deep resonance in the Punjab
and Rohilkhand. In Shiah led states like Bengal and Awadh, there was a marked resurgence
of elegies and marsia traditions all of which gestured to a heightened sense of religious
identification.
The period also saw a remarkable cultural efflorescence – developments in music, poetry,
language are seen by scholars as embodying a major change in register and initiating the so
called modern turn in artistic production. The region came into full focus – art, architecture
and poetry as well as religious expressions tended to be grounded in their regional contexts.
We have for instance poets like Shah Abdul Latif of Bhit (1689-1752) writing in Sindhi and
Bulhe Shah (1680-1758) and Waris Shah (bc.1730) in Punjabi not to speak of important
regional poetry in Bengal and Maharashtra.
Culture in an age of change
Scholars of art and cultural production as well as language have acknowledged the vitality
of the 18th century courts that emerged as important patrons and laboratories for
innovation. Notwithstanding disruption in structures of imperial patronage, the arts would
appear to have thrived in regional courts and imbibed rich regional inputs. This was
especially true of painting – the miniature traditions in Rajasthan are a case in point.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
17 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Figure 1.1.7: Akbar watching Tansen take a lesson from Swami Haridas in Vrindavan;
from a Mughal miniature painting in the Jaipur-Kishangarh (Rajasthan) mixed style, circa
A.D. 1750.
Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Swami_haridas_TANSEN_akbar_minature-
painting_Rajasthan_c1750_crp.jpg
Some well known themes that were represented in Rajasthani miniatures were devotional –
Krishna lila episodes – as well as representations of melody known as the Ragmala series.
There were noticeably Mughal elements in these paintings with similarities in vertical
formats and compositions. Rajasthani painting (all its schools) was based on a model of
workshop production and that through these workshops there was a dissemination of older
Mughal conventions. This was also true of the Pahari style of painting that developed in the
Himalayan foothills – in its first phase there was the intense Basohli style and in its later
phase the Kangra style seen to be more influenced by the styles of Delhi and Lucknow. This
evolved between 1740 and 1775 when a number of artists fled Delhi for the hills in search
of patrons and opted for the lyrical style where colours were less intense and the there was
a more naturalistic treatment of landscape.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
18 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Figure 1.1.8: Bhairavi Ragini, Manley Ragamala, an album painting in gouache on paper
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragamala_paintings
The vitality of regionalism was evident in architecture as well. The new states invested in
public buildings and in the process persisted with the older imperial style in addition to
engaging with new idioms and expressions. Catherine Asher in her work, indicates how
European styles were preferred for secular architecture in Murshidabad and Lucknow and
how in temple architecture in Jaipur and Delhi, the model of the haveli was used to good
effect. Surface decoration in temples was also similar to contemporary Muslim architecture.
Figures of Europeans in hats also made their way as temple decoration.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
19 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Figure 1.1.9: Constantia Hall in Lucknow
Source:
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00routesdata/1700_1799/claudemartin/claud
emartin.html
It was in the 18th century that remarkable advances in music, both Hindustani and
Karnatik, were registered leading to improvisations in form, the khyal and kriti developed
and refined by musician-composers like Sadarang and Tyagaraja respectively. Many of the
artistic developments were made possible thanks to the interest and eclectic enthusiasm of
regional courts that emerged as important sites of change, even modernity. For example,
the Tanjore court under the Maratha ruler Serfoji II (1798-1832) undertook a series of
interesting experiments, set up a museum, founded free public schools, developed new
curricula and tried to synthesize western and Indian methods in medicine. Similarly we have
the case of the Jaipur court of Raja Jai Singh who established an astronomical observatory
and who displayed a keen interest in music and its systematization. Artists and musicians
found new patrons in regional courts such as Awadh, Jaipur, Murshidabad, Hyderabad and
Tanjore with the result that there was a greater dissemination of the older high imperial
style. Even Delhi until the 1740s appears to have retained its aura as the cultural capital par
excellence. We have an excellent account of the arts scene in the Muraqqa e Dehli by
Dargah Quli Khan whose snapshots of musicians, entertainers and dancers suggest a
vibrant city living life to its full. The development of Urdu poetry in Delhi and Lucknow
testified to the vitality of artistic energies in the period making it at least in cultural terms
an extremely formative period for the articulation of modern forms and styles. Nowhere was
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
20 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
this sensibility better articulated than in the sphere of literary and cultural production where
new modes of reflection, new methodological strategies were in full display.
Value addition: did you know?
Khyal and Kriti
Khyal and Kriti are the dominant genres of vocal art music in North and South India
respectively. Both these composition types are short songs with two or more
typically three parts. The Khyal is normally associated with the famous 18th century
composer Niyamat Khan Sadarang of the court of Muhammad Shah Rangile (1719-
48) in Delhi although more recent research suggests that the genre was in use even
earlier. There is little doubt that it enjoyed huge popularity in and after the 18th
century and became the basis for modern Hindustani music as we know it know. The
composition, set to a particular raga, is the basis for individual improvisation by the
singer.
Khyal compositions deployed Brajbhasha for the most part although there are
several compositions in Persian as well. Most of the compositions celebrate love and
devotion. The perfection of the khyals is associated with the emergence of several
gharana or singing styles from the mid 19th century. For those interested in a short
history of the evolution of Hindustani Music, see Jon Barlow and Lakshmi
Subramanian, „Music and society from the Mughals to the Mutiny‟, EPW, May 12,
2007. For those interested in following a class in khyal singing, see the following
website http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=293684.
Kriti or kirtanai is a form typical to Karnatik music and developed between the 16th
and 20th centuries. Reaching its perfection under the Tanjore trinity of Tyagaraja
(1759-1847), Diksitar (1776-1827) and Syama Sastri 1762-1827). The kriti is
entirely religious in its theme, the composer writing both the poetry and the melody.
The language used is mostly Telugu with some compositions in Sanskrit and Tamil.
Source: Subramanian, Lakshmi. 2006. From the Tanjore Court to the Madras Music
Academy: A social history of music in south India. New Delhi: Oxford University
Press.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
21 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
In conclusion
Can we on the basis of social and cultural change call the 18th century as a period of early
modernity? This is in fact one of the most important research questions to have emerged
among historians and scholars of early modern India. Scholars working on literary and
historical production suggest that the long 18th century saw important shifts in the way
histories were being written and that these reflected new paradigms of power and
governance. New kinds of historical production were apparent in southern India where the
scribes, referred to as karanams who formed part of the mobile literati, adopted new
markers and choices in their descriptions. In Bengal too the impact of a Persianized culture
helped the formation of new genres that showed greater sensitivity to political contingencies
and contributed to a new political vocabulary. In terms of artistic creativity and cultural
expression, there is no doubt that the century saw new forms and styles, especially in music
where the steady growth in the popularity of Khyal and Kriti signaled a new cultural choice
making possible greater individual improvisation.
This is however, not to argue that the articulation of a new temperament- whether it
assumed the forms of greater social mobility, of mercantilist state policy by Indian rulers, of
a more hybrid and cosmopolitan court culture or of a more regionally inspired artistic
repertoire was a smooth process and that it moved seamlessly into the new colonial
dispensation of the succeeding century. The advent of colonial rule was fraught with very
serious consequences for the old order while the politics of transition were no less
destabilizing. This is evident when we look at the breakdown of social order in the cities and
in the countryside that underwent serious episodes of violence that were inspired largely by
the dislocation of an older regime of control. The sanyasi and fakir rebellions in Bengal
before, during and after the famine of 1770 testified to the resistance among several social
groups to the new order and its pecuniary demands. The Dasnami Sanyasis and Madari
fakirs were armed wandering mendicants who participated in the business of provisioning,
money lending and trade. These groups resented and resisted Company demands for
revenue in a rapidly deteriorating situation when large numbers of disbanded soldiers and
displaced people especially after the famine of 1770 joined their cause. There were
rebellions in Malabar as well against the expanding control of the English Company even if
these did not necessarily assume early elements of nationalist feeling. Later writers like
Bankim Chandra Chattopadyaya invested such feelings of patriotic fervour in these
insurrectionary movements as he represented the skirmishes as an expression of organic
nationalist fervour. For as William Pinch has argued, joint Sanyasi-Fakir uprisings are
revealing as they suggest the dynamics and technologies of mobilization, recruitment and
soldiering among ascetics in the 18th century and the success these groups had enjoyed in
the military economy of the period. That war and politics cast a long shadow on the 18th
century is perhaps the most enduring impression we carry when we recall the period even
as courts and merchants demonstrated their resilience in defining and expanding their
domains of creativity and business respectively. The dynamics of transition played
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
22 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
themselves out with casualties and beneficiaries left to assume the mantle of resistance and
cooperation in the succeeding century.
1.2: The eighteenth century: society, economy and polity
Introduction
In the middle of the 1980s two books published within a few years of each other,
Christopher Bayly‟s Rulers, Townsmen and Bazars and Muzaffar Alam‟s The Crisis of Empire
in Mughal North India brought a renewed focus on the 18th century. The 18th century had
always been important in Indian history. Generally it was seen as a period of transition in
which the land-based Mughal empire gave way to the power of the sea-based British
empire. The consensus till the 1980s was that the moribund Mughal state had collapsed due
to its own contradictions and the English East India Company representing the aggressive
mercantilist forces of the West had taken advantage of the ensuing confusion to subjugate
and reduce India to a colony. The transition was not simply political – one regime replacing
another, but also economic: the pre-modern economy of the Mughals was forcibly linked to
world capitalist markets to India‟s detriment. For Indian historians, the 18th century
signalled the beginning of a new historical era of pillage and colonial rule.
The historian Seema Alavi has suggested that the new writings on the 18th century have
created a divide. Those studying the process of the decline of the Mughals - which happened
in the first few decades of the 18th century - have a tendency to extend their views and
apply them to the entire century. For instance, these historians argue that with the collapse
of the centralized Mughal state structure the important political, economic and social
institutions tied with the state also crumbled, bringing unrest and havoc through the
century. The newer historians studying the later period paint a less gloomy picture. They
argue that their viewpoint - which studies trends from the peripheries and not the centre -
presents an altogether different scenario. According to them the process was one of
decentralization and assertion of regional powers rather than outright decline. They say that
these trends were noticeable early and left their mark on the rest of the century. Clearly
there was little agreement between the two views and this clash of interpretations is what
we will examine below. One outcome of this debate was that it is now possible to present a
more holistic and varied picture of the 18th century than before.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
23 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Figure 1.2.1: Map India 1700-1792
Source: http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fil:India_map_1700_1792.jpg
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
24 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Decline of the Mughals
This is a well-worn topic and we are familiar with the most influential arguments in the work
of historians of the „Aligarh School‟ – Satish Chandra, Athar Ali and Irfan Habib. Our
intention is not to go over these arguments once again but to delineate the major strands
which have relevance for the debate on the 18th century. Satish Chandra in his book on
politics in the Mughal court had argued that it was really the crisis in Mughal institutions –
the mansab and jagir that brought about a fiscal crisis in the Mughal state leading to its
weakening and collapse. Athar Ali in a complimentary study demonstrated how the crisis in
the Mughal state was due to be-jagiri i.e. the lack of jagirs. The emperor Aurangzeb was
aware of such a problem and in a widely quoted document had apparently written: „ek
anaar, sau bimaar‟ which implied that there were too few fruits of office being chased by too
many candidates. Such a state of affairs, both these historians argue, was due to the
crushing burden of expansionist wars, rebellions and the attempt by the Mughal state to
accommodate newer elements in the higher echelons of the administration i.e. within the
mansabdari system. The crisis occurred because there were too many people awaiting the
patronage of the state and not enough land to distribute as jagirs. The implication was that
this led to disaffection and eventually the weakening of the central structure of the Mughal
state.
Irfan Habib‟s celebrated study shifted the focus to the agrarian economy. He argued that
the revenue demand on the peasantry was high and with the transferability of jagirs the
tendency of mansabdars to squeeze the peasantry grew. Abandonment of land, flight to
more hospitable regions or open rebellion were the paths that the Mughal peasantry took to
resist growing exploitation. The great rebellions against the Mughal state by the Jats,
Satnamis, Marathas and Sikhs were according to Habib essentially peasant rebellions led by
local zamindars.
Summing up the above views one can say that according to Aligarh historians the Mughal
state was a highly centralized revenue extracting structure. In the long run it was unable to
satisfy on the one hand the expectations of its chief support base of primarily noblemen i.e.
mansabdars and on the other of the revenue paying peasantry, who could not meet the
unreasonable demands of the state. Thus the clues to understanding the decline of the
Mughal state during our period were state institutions like mansab and jagir and the
agrarian economy
Value addition: did you know?
Decline of the Mughals: a contemporary account
„For generosity, munificence, boundless good nature, extenuation of faults, and
forgiveness of offences, very few monarchs have been found equal to Bahadur
Shah….But though he had no vice in his character, such complacency and such
negligence were exhibited in the protection of the state and in the government and
management of the country, that witty sarcastic people found the date of his
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
25 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
accession in the words Shah-I be-khabar i.e. “Heedless King”.
[Bahadur Shah succeeded Aurangzeb in 1707].
Source: Khafi Khan, Muntakhab-ul Lubab [Selection from Discourses], translated in
Elliot and Dowson, Vol.VII, The History of India as told by its own Historians, reprint,
410.
Despite the convincing and authoritative picture of the decline of Mughals, this
interpretation was challenged. J.F. Richards demonstrated that in Mughal Deccan there was
no shortage of jagirs. So clearly, earlier arguments needed to be modified in this light. But it
was Muzaffar Alam‟s detailed study for provinces like Awadh and Punjab that demonstrated
that the peasant rebellions led by zamindars were in areas of relative agrarian prosperity.
This was a serious challenge to the „high revenue leading to exploitation – leading to
poverty – leading to rebellion‟ argument. From Alam‟s evidence it would seem that peasant
rebellions occurred because they were growing prosperous and were unwilling to alienate
their prosperity to the Mughal state. Furthermore, the work of historian Chetan Singh
demonstrated that in the peripheries of empire the Mughal state‟s relations with
communities was often informal. This meant that the much vaunted all-controlling
centralized structure of the Mughal state needed to be qualified. In this scenario if the
Mughal state did collapse it left no impact on distant regions.
For the debate on the nature of the 18th century this had two implications: decline of the
Mughal state did not indicate an overall economic decline. Political and social forms also
survived in areas where the Mughal reach had been limited.
Typologies of states following the Mughal decline
Drawing on the work of Christopher Bayly, historians have identified broadly three types of
states that replaced the Mughal empire. These characterizations help us to understand the
nature of the smaller political formations. Firstly there was the „successor state‟ i.e.
provinces like Bengal, Awadh and Hyderabad which grew out of the body of the erstwhile
Mughal empire. Murshid Quli Khan in Bengal, Saadat Khan in Awadh and Asaf Jah in
Hyderabad were powerful nobles, governors and representatives of the Mughals who taking
advantage of the chaos at the centre carved out kingdoms for themselves combining the
hitherto separate departments of nizamat and diwani. Muzaffar Alam has called this the
formation of the „new subedari‟. Although they acknowledged the political suzerainty of the
Mughals and called themselves nawabs in deference, in effect they had stopped sending
revenue to the centre and had become autonomous. A second type of state was the „warrior
state‟ built by communities who, originating in parts of the Mughal empire, had been at war
with the Mughal state and had acquired statist ambitions in the process. The most
prominent examples were the Marathas and the Sikhs. A third category comprised of
relatively smaller „compact states‟ like those of Mysore in the south or Rohillas in the north.
These categorizations one must remember were convenient ways to describe these new
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
26 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
states and not mutually exclusive. A state like Mysore for instance, could be categorized as
both „compact‟ and „warrior‟. And such overlapping characteristics could be found elsewhere
too.
Value addition: did you know?
Murshid Quli Khan
The first nawab of Bengal was born of Brahman parents in South India but orphaned
at an early age. He travelled widely with his patron Haji Safi Isfahani and attracted
the attention of Aurangzeb who confirmed his position as Diwan of Bengal. After
Aurangzeb‟s death he became Subahdar of Bengal consolidating his position as an
independent and powerful noble. His career showcases the possibilities that existed
for enterprising and clever men in the Mughal administration of enhancing their
social and economic position in the time of political flux.
Source: Ray, N. R. 1988. Bengal Nawab, Calcutta: Victoria Memorial
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
27 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Figure 1.2.2: Murshid Quli Khan, Nawab of Bengal
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Murshid_Quli_Jafar_Khan.jpg
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
28 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Figure 1.2.3: Saadat Khan, Nawab of Awadh
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Saadut_Aly_Khan.jpg
Figure 1.2.4: Asaf Jah, Nizam of Hyderabad
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nizam-ul-mulk.jpg
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
29 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
How were these states different from the Mughals?
Newer research has gone deep into the nature of these smaller political formations, and
noted three broad trends. While trying to understand these trends, historians draw on
sophisticated concepts and terminology developed by historians for Europe but which seem
to fit well with trends in India during the 18th century as well. Firstly in the sphere of rights
over cultivated land – which was the principal source of state income – the trend was from
the prebendal to the partrimonial. This was an important development. “Prebendal” in
Europe meant the revenue rights of the Church, but historians have widened the scope of
this term to mean the state‟s control of agricultural land especially the rights over revenue.
“Patrimony” means property inherited from ancestors. In eighteenth century India, the
centralized state‟s monopoly to distribute rights over land i.e. prebendal rights was clearly
weakening with its political decline. Local representatives of the state, petty officials,
revenue managers with roots in provincial society were asserting their rights over land and
declaring it inheritable property. In other words the locus of economic power was shifting to
a new class of people. Socially too this was significant since this class used its economic
clout to enhance its standing in society.
Secondly, in the newly formed provincial states the trend was towards military fiscalism.
This meant garnering financial resources, finding a social base and building an effective
standing army. The historians Burton Stein and David Washbrook have pointed out that
military fiscalism in the 18th century meant states were widening their tax base in
innovative ways like appointing salaried tax collectors as well as putting together a
centralized army. The adoption of new military technology also meant that the costs of
statehood were rising which in turn put pressure on the collection of revenue. Seema Alavi
has pointed out that this in effect meant freeing the state from dependence on the local
aristocracy and organizing a state around war. In Mysore for instance, Haider Ali and Tipu
Sultan encouraged peasant agriculture and eliminated middlemen like mirasidars and
jenmis. Removing middlemen meant the state could increase its share of revenue as well as
provide relief to the peasant. As a result of such rigorous management, Mysore became one
of the most prosperous states in the 18th century and also famous for its well equipped
standing army of 60,000 soldiers.
A third trend was the commercialization of royal or political power. This literally meant
merchant participation in politics. In Bengal the banking family of the Jagat Seths became
chief financiers of the nawabs, providing credit and participating in revenue farming. The
power of these merchant bankers was most apparent when in the ensuing conflict between
the Bengal ruler Sirajudaula and the East India Company, the Seths used their clout and
power to ensure the defeat of the former in the Battle of Plassey [1757]. Commercialization
of power encouraged the use of objective monetary values to express social relationships.
Rents, houses, proprietary rights of landholders and village headmen, statuses and offices
were leased and sub-leased as relationships between various groups changed. The new
states also used this process of sharing power to incorporate groups other than merchants
and bankers in their quest for military might and capital. The Marathas and Sikhs
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
30 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
maintained ties of reciprocity and patronage with enterprising peasant castes, mercenaries
and pioneer settlers on frontier lands in an attempt to broaden the base of their rule.
Society: the importance of intermediaries
The most notable contribution of Christopher Bayly has been to resurrect the importance of
the intermediate classes in the 18th century. Slow accumulation of wealth by these
intermediaries formed the basis of the emerging kingdoms in the 18th century. These
intermediaries benefited most from the weakening of Mughal rule which had dwarfed them,
and they now emerged into the limelight. Among others these included Hindu and Muslim
revenue farmers. „Farming‟ here meant that in return for a fixed sum, the state gave away
rights to keep the revenue. This arrangement suited the new rulers who were keen that
regular and steady payments were made to the state. The farming of such rights also
extended to trade and markets. Hindu and Jain merchants and bankers [Agarwals
throughout the north, Khattris from Punjab, Oswals, Maheshwaris from Rajasthan etc.]
formed another important component of this intermediary group. Their presence testified to
a continuous tradition of trading in India, as the existence of merchant castes indicate
saraafs [money dealers], bazazas [cloth dealers], jouhuris [jewellers] etc. Other than
participating in trade they lent money to rulers and stood as guarantors of revenue. Another
important group were the Muslim gentry – scribes, accountants and other petty officials who
with the weakening of the Mughals rapidly grew roots in local society forming the nuclei of
new settlements like qasbas [fixed gentry seats]. These were people who had intimate and
long experience of managing bazaars and revenue accounts. In these new settlements
gentrification took the form of cultural activity with the establishment of religious and
educational institutions. Bayly‟s wide-ranging study had drawn on the earlier work of
anthropologist-historian Bernard Cohn. In the Benaras region Cohn had argued, traditional
intermediaries found new power with changing circumstances. According to him
intermediaries transited to new roles, often functioning as „hinges‟ between the state and
local society.
The study of intermediaries was a marked departure from the „Aligarh School‟ which had
focused primarily on the revenue extracting mechanism and the agrarian economy. The
focus on these classes by Bayly was an attempt to register the importance of non-
agricultural production and trade and the rich history of trading communities.
The historian Tapan Raychaudhuri has written that in the 18th century the development of
market forces made deep inroads into the subsistence character of Indian agriculture.
Farmers became involved with trade and traders with farming. The coming together of
merchant and agrarian interests in the countryside, what Bayly has called the „intermediate
economy‟, meant that agricultural commodity production got linked to commercial networks
and helped the new states to extract revenue more thoroughly with the help of
intermediaries. Non-food crop production [cotton, raw silk, indigo, oil etc.] was also widely
prevalent and there was a tendency to localization i.e. if advantages existed and there was
enough demand, farmers tended to produce more of the same. The dynamism of this
process in the 18th century can be seen throughout the Ganges valley as a string of ganjes
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
31 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
[fixed regulated markets], mandis [wholesale markets] and qasbas sprang up, testifying to
the process of an incipient urbanization and economic activity.
Society: other productive classes
Bayly‟s study of the intermediaries has overshadowed the condition of the other productive
classes in 18th century north India. Few detailed studies exist and one can only guess very
broadly the condition of the peasantry and the artisans in rural and urban centres. One
thing we know: the land-man ratio was favourable, large parts of the Indian subcontinent
was forested and yet unclaimed. Theoretically therefore, plenty of land was available for
cultivation which made the position of the peasant less vulnerable. The threat of migration
would have made the violation of customary and contractual rights of peasants less likely
also. In pockets of agricultural growth like Mysore and in the Deccan under the Marathas,
purposive state action to curb intermediaries must have benefited the less-privileged
peasants.
In the towns and cities the condition of the working classes – artisans, handicraft workers,
weavers etc. was linked to growing demand for goods from regional capitals and from
outside India. Here too it seems their economic condition was better than what happened
later when the East India Company imposed stringent controls on artisanal production.
Economy
The economic indicators for the 18th century show that the economy fared well before the
advent of colonial rule. There is little record of sustained famines. The devastating famine of
1770 happened in Bengal after the inauguration of Company rule. Population, prices, trade
and production all showed an upward swing which broadly indicated a positive trend.
Urbanization was also an important indicator of economic prosperity but here the story was
more complicated. As Ashin Dasgupta pointed, out the decline of some cities was
compensated for by the growth of others. Older Mughal centres like Delhi, Agra, Lahore and
Burhanpur declined with Mughal political fortunes. Important port cities like Surat and
Masulipatnam too declined as international trade was wrested away from Indian merchants
by European companies. Their place was taken by colonial cities like Madras, Bombay and
Calcutta and the inland cities and capitals of regional kingdoms: Lucknow, Fyzabad,
Benaras, Hyderabad, Srirangapatam and Bangalore. Trading cities like Mirzapur, Kanpur and
Baroda also came into being to service trade.
Paradoxically, inland trade thrived and merchant corporations managed to maintain their
networks despite the growing political fragmentation. Political fragmentation in fact made
the credit network stronger. By the middle of the 18th century Jagat Seth could send the
entire revenue of the eastern provinces as a hundi drawn on his agents in Delhi. B.R.
Grover‟s research shows that local rural commercial production found new markets in the
provincial kingdoms and was thus compensated for any disruptions caused by the
disintegration of the Mughal empire. Conspicuous consumption in the regional courts
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
32 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
encouraged production and provided employment to labour outside the traditional agrarian
sphere. Christopher Bayly has written that commerce, urban development and specialist
agricultural production which traditionally existed along the route of Delhi and Bengal during
Mughal times was replicated in the 18th century along other routes that indicated an
economic shift – between the newer political centres of Lucknow and Calcutta via Benaras
and Patna.
There was a thriving inter-regional trade. Marathas acquired cloth, food grains and cattle
from the Gangetic plain. Cotton wool and hides from the northern Deccan, sugar from
Benaras, and cloth from Carnatic was supplied to Mysore. Regions specialized in products
and the volume of trade among provinces was large. Gujarat imported textiles from Bengal.
Malabar and Coromandel depended on food supplies from Bengal. Similar prices in the
major coastal trading towns indicated that markets had integrated substantially. Long
distance trade procured goods from arangs or localized centres of production and there was
even some evidence for artisan-entrepreneurs who became proprietors of workshops. This
has prompted some historians to argue that 18th century India showed signs of proto-
industrialization. Sanjay Subrahmanyam and Christopher Bayly have even argued that the
ensemble of economic activity handled by entrepreneurs in the 18th century which included
revenue farming, private trade, warfare and loans, made them into enterprising „portfolio
capitalists‟.
Another interesting aspect of the 18th century economy was the contribution of war.
Traditionally historians had seen the growth of warring states as destroying the Mughal
peace and playing havoc with the economy. But Christopher Bayly has argued that there
was another side to this picture of devastation. Indeed many traditional trade routes were
destroyed and movement of goods suffered. But war gave a fillip to production too. Towns
and villages in Awadh contributed to a thriving market for saltpetre, swords and matchlocks.
Afghan Rohilla towns were famous for their bows and arrows and the trademark Rampur
daggers. Jhansi was well-known for its canon foundries. Boot makers and liquor distillers
also had a thriving business and so did grain merchants who had to supply food grains and
fodder to the large armies and seige trains as they moved across provinces. War thus
meant employment and the opportunity to create wealth as the growth of numerous
ancillary industries testified.
The 18th century saw both devastation due to Mughal decline as well as rapid adjustment
as economic forces regrouped and re-established themselves in more hospitable areas. This
mixed view of the period which is different from the earlier one of relentless decline and
disintegration has prompted historians to characterize the period as one that was full of
dynamism. They argue that this was the primary reason why the European companies got
attracted to India in the first place. Why would these trading companies whose governing
motive was profit expend their mercantile energies if 18th century India was in economic
decline?
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
33 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Potentialities of capitalist development
Despite all the positive economic indicators, historians are in agreement that India showed
little potentialities for developing into a full-fledged capitalist economy. This is important,
since it answers partially why India was unable to resist the inroads of a superior economic
power like the East India Company. Irfan Habib had argued that for the full establishment of
capitalism, Mughal India needed the development of indicators like wage labour, commodity
production and mechanization of industry. He argued that in Mughal India there was a
growth of markets and monetization but this in itself was not enough evidence for the
beginnings of capitalism. The payment of revenue in cash also led to the development of
merchant capital but this extractive process did not lead to any reinvestment in the
countryside. Towns that developed alongside were mere parasites that lived off the
countryside. One important indicator of this failure was the response of elites in Mughal
India. Irfan Habib has shown that with enormous resources at their command they showed
little interest in economic and scientific developments. While mansabdars invested in
horticulture since this was a way of showcasing status, they took little interest in enhancing
agricultural techniques. Habib‟s pioneering essay in fact anticipated Robert Brenner‟s
argument about the importance of class power in the transition to capitalism. Brenner had
argued that establishment of capitalist relations in the European countryside was crucially
dependent on the role that classes with access to land and other resources played in the
process.
Tapan Raychaudhuri has also confirmed that the rural sector of the Indian economy
remained a source of supply rather than a market for products, indicating that peasant
incomes were not rising – a serious hindrance to the transformation of the economy. Other
inhibiting factors were a pre-modern system of transport, a tradition of minutely specialized
hereditary skills that were resistant to labour saving technology, and the deeply entrenched
institution of caste. He has argued that the very sophisticated artisanal skills and existing
market networks may have paradoxically inhibited further change as they were able to cope
with growing domestic and international demand. Christopher Bayly has written that the
growing influence of commercial houses did not signal the emergence of a bourgeoisie.
Capital controlled by traders and revenue farmers was closely tied to land and was not
invested in new forms of production.
The establishment of Company rule
How did the English East India Company establish itself as India‟s new ruling power?
Traditionally historians have focused on the chicanery and deceit of the Company in Bengal
and the brute force of colonialism. Irfan Habib has argued that the establishment of
Company rule foisted an alien state with little commitment to India. After the Battle of
Buxar [1764] and the capture of Bengal‟s diwani, bullion flows from Europe to India were
stopped. As a result drain of wealth from the country intensified. From the second decade of
the 19th century Company rule also caused large-scale de-industrialization. This was the
real face of colonialism and the imposition of the colonial economy created a complete break
with the Mughal past.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
34 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Other historians have however argued for a case of continuity. According to this argument,
the East India Company grafted successfully onto the vibrant economic currents in 18th
century India. Two key innovations – military fiscalism and revenue farming were used by
the Company to deeply entrench its rule. In other words the Company state was no
„outsider‟ but drew on political and economic currents within India itself. After Clive‟s
success in Bengal, Burton Stein has pointed out, Indian rulers paradoxically became
attracted to the Company requesting it to provide military support – the beginnings of the
infamous „subsidiary system‟. The Company in its turn used military influence to effectively
push its business interests. Any fears of the Company taking over territory was tempered by
the knowledge that back home in England imperial policies were constantly under attack in
the English Parliament. The Company carefully avoided any use of the symbols of
sovereignty and tacitly acknowledged the ineffectual Mughals as their overlords. Like Indian
rulers, the Company also took to capturing wherever possible monopolies in royal
prerogatives like salt and saltpetre. The Company‟s success was facilitated by the close
bonds with Indian merchant and banking families i.e. with credit and markets which
ultimately helped the Company subvert the indigenous regimes in India. In this view the
attempt to control India‟s trade and production ended with the Company‟s political control
over India. Merchant and banking families were attracted to the Company because in its
enclaves there was the promise of secure property rights. Indian rulers desperate for cash
were well known to violate such rights and squeeze rich merchants for their own ends. Thus
commercial communities and the new gentry became the foundation of the British colonial
regime.
However this view underestimates many factors. The English East India Company had many
advantages. In England it was registered as a joint stock company which meant that risk of
mercantile ventures was divided among many. At crucial moments the English state also
bailed out the company from financial crises. England‟s growing mastery of the seas also
became a nationalist issue and attracted wide support from the English public. The
Company‟s take-over of Bengal was however prompted by sheer greed. After the Battle of
Plassey it became obvious to the English merchants that untold opportunities for loot
existed if political power was consolidated. Critics of Company rule in England, vociferous
about the expanding territory outside Bengal dominions, were prepared to look the other
way once it became apparent that the costs of imperial expansion were paying handsome
returns to the Company. Imperial expansion under Governor General Wellesley acquired an
aggressive edge and a justificatory ideology because it was fuelled by wide mobilization in
England against Napoleon. Wellesley even subordinated the Mughal emperor in Delhi in
1803. Large swathes of territory were brought under direct rule and the raison d‟etre of
imperialism became both territorial domination and economic gain.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
35 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Figure 1.2.5: Map of India in 1760
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:India-1760-map.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
36 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
1.1 Summary
The eighteenth century occupies a special position in Indian history as it is literally
positioned between two empires. In recent decades, the century has engaged the attention
of historians who have located important social processes in the period that merit as much
attention as the decline of the Mughal political structure.
Among the most significant developments in the period, were regionalism and regional state
formation that was based on local economic development and new revenue extracting
mechanisms. The regional states were at war with one another and this created conditions
of a war economy that in fact constituted the material basis for eighteenth century regimes.
The second half of the century saw the gradual expansion and penetration of the English
East India Company with serious consequences for regional polities and economies. This
created long term social displacement and which was reflected in a series of popular
uprisings as well.
The century was in terms of cultural development, extremely vibrant. In fact this is one of
the strange contradictions of the period – political change and fragmentation coexisting with
cultural creativity and expression. This may be explained by the fact that regional patronage
of the arts was vibrant in the period and it coincided with the emergence of talented artists
who brought to their work a new sensibility.
1.2 Summary
The historiographical divide on the 18th century follows the two halves of the century. The
first half is explored by the Aligarh school and the second half by historians who have taken
cues from the work of Chris Bayly.
The Aligarh School argues that the decline of the Mughals was linked to the centralized
structure of the Mughal state and the decline of the agrarian economy. Muzaffar Alam and
others have qualified this view by pointing out that areas of agrarian unrest were also areas
of relative prosperity.
The nature of the states emerging from the decline of the Mughals can be broadly
categorized as „Successor‟, „Warrior‟ and „Compact‟. These states were marked by trends
indicating a transition from the prebendal to partrimonial land holdings, military fiscalism
and commercialization of power.
Another important trend was the consolidation of the intermediary classes – merchants,
revenue farmers and gentry. Chris Bayly‟s work has shown the importance of these groups
in trade, credit and markets and how these sustained and lent a new direction to 18th
century political economy.
Economic indicators like population, prices, production and urbanization show that there
was dynamic economic activity and initiatives and these compensated for decline in large
areas of the subcontinent.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
37 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
The key to the 18th century is thus „decentralization‟ not „decline‟. Culturally too there was a
tendency towards greater complexity rather than homogeneity.
1.1: Exercises
Essay questions
1) What in your view is the most striking feature about the 18th century in Indian history?
2) How did regional polities in 18th century India facilitate the rise of new social groups?
3) Comment on the cultural developments in 18th century India.
Objective Questions
Question Number Type of question LOD
1 Arrange in chronological
order
1
Question
a) Battle of Plassey
b) Death of Aurangzeb
c) Sack of Delhi by Nadir Shah
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
b) c) a)
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
Death of Aurangzeb (1707)
Nadir Shah‟s invasion of Delhi 1739-40
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
38 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Battle of Plassey 23 June 1757
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
Reviewer‟s Comment:
Question Number Type of question LOD
2 Multiple choice question 2
Question
Raag Maala is a form of:
a) Music
b) Painting
c) Poetry
d) Architecture
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
b)
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
Raag Maala is a specific category of painting associated with medieval Rajasthan. In
these painting each raga is personified by a colour, mood, and a verse describing a
story of a hero and heroine (nayaka and nayika). It also elucidates the season and
the time of day and night in which a particular raga is to be sung; and finally most
paintings also demarcate the specific Hindu deities attached with the raga, like
Bhairava or Bhairavi to Shiva, Sri to Devi. Literally a garland of melodies – it
suggests the close intersection of the visual and the aural as a theme of artistic
imagination. Given that the courts in Rajasthan were big time patrons of the arts, it
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
39 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
is not surprising that such a genre of painting should have emerged.
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
Reviewer‟s Comment:
Question Number Type of question LOD
3 Multiple choice question 2
Question
Military fiscalism denotes:
a) Army reform
b) New and centralized tax arrangements
c) Centralized bureaucracy
d) Revenue farming
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
b)
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
Military fiscalism is a term specifically used in relation to the centralized tax
arrangements that the eighteenth century states adopted in order to appropriate
revenues and thereby maintain their fighting forces. Fiscalism suggests close
supervision of financial affairs especially as it revolved around the necessity of
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
40 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
maintaining and efficient army.
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
Reviewer‟s Comment:
1.2: Exercises
Essay questions
1) How has Christopher Bayly‟s book revised our understanding of the 18th century?
2) To what extent did non-agricultural wealth play an important part in the dynamics of the
18th century economy?
3) Examine the role of various classes in the 18th century. Which class according to
historians played a crucial role in sustaining the intermediate economy?
4) Examine the nature of the regional states which emerged after the decline of the
centralized Mughal state in the 18th century.
5) Did India have the potentialities for developing into a full-fledged capitalist economy in
the 18th century?
6) Do you think the nature of the 18th century was determined by the decline of the
centralized Mughal state?
7) „Economic decline in areas closely integrated with the Mughal state was compensated by
dynamic growth elsewhere in India‟. Comment.
8) Examine the role of merchants and traders in the 18th century.
9) How convincing is the critique of the „Aligarh‟ school by later historians?
10) Would you agree that colonization by the East India Company was a result of India‟s
inability to modernize itself in the 18th century?
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
41 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Objective Operations
Question Number Type of question LOD
1 True or False 1
Question
Which of these statements is false regarding Military Fiscalism?
It was an attempt by the state to do away with intermediaries.
A more efficient form of revenue collection.
Loot collected by the army
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
c)
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
Military Fiscalism had nothing to do with loot.
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
a) and b): It was a more centralized and efficient form of tax collection which
included the army and salaried tax collectors and which tried to do away with
traditional intermediaries who had a hold on the peasants.
Reviewer‟s Comment:
Question Number Type of question LOD
2 True or False 1
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
42 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Question
Which of these statements is false regarding intermediaries in eighteenth century
India?
Intermediaries were local craftsmen who supplied luxury goods to the royal courts.
They were local officials who represented the administration.
Hindu and Jain merchants who lent money to the state
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
a)
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
Craftspeople were important to the economy but they could not emerge as
intermediaries with a political role.
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
b) and c): Local officials who formed part of the gentry and Jain and Hindu
merchants have been identified by Bayly as important groups which formed the
intermediary class in the eighteenth century.
Reviewer‟s Comment:
Question Number Type of question LOD
3 True or False 1
Question
Which of these statements are true?
The Mughal empire declined because the East India Company became powerful.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
43 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
The Mughal empire declined because of internal political turmoil.
The Mughal empire disintegrated because it was unable to efficiently collect revenue
from the peasants.
The Mughal empire declined because of foreign invasions.
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
b) and c)
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
Pressure to collect revenue was resisted by powerful local intermediaries and
elsewhere it led to devastation.
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
a) and d): This was the consequences of Mughal decline and not its cause.
Reviewer‟s Comment:
Question Number Type of question LOD
4 True or False 1
Question
Which of these statements are false regarding the arguments of the „Aligarh‟ school?
a) Mughals declined because of incapable rulers
b) The crisis of the Mughal empire was fiscal in character.
c) Mughals declined because of internal warfare among successors.
d) Mughals declined due to the mansabdari crisis.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
44 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
a) and c)
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
The „Aligarh‟ school has argued that personal capabilities and actions of rulers cannot
wholly explain why a large and entrenched state like the Mughals collapsed.
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
b) and d): The „Aligarh‟ school has stressed the importance of studying the internal
crisis of the Mughal administration which led to its decline.
Reviewer‟s Comment:
Question Number Type of question LOD
5 True or False 1
Question
Which of these statements is false regarding the „Successor States‟?
a) The Successor State ensured succession to the eldest son of the king.
b) Successor states were carved out of Mughal provinces by erstwhile governors.
c) The heads of Successor States were Mughal princes.
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
b)
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
„Successor‟ state is a term coined by Bayly. These are states that emerged after
Mughal decline from within Mughal territories and were usually led by former Mughal
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
45 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
governors or generals.
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
a) and c): „Successor‟ here means states that emerged out of Mughal territories and
has nothing to do with succession within the ruling families.
Reviewer‟s Comment:
Question Number Type of question LOD
6 Match the following 2
Question
Match the following:
a) Murshid Quli Khan i) Awadh
b) Asaf Jah ii) Mughal emperor
c) Saadat Khan iii) Bengal
d) Jagat Seth iv) Mysore
e) Hyder Ali v) Hyderabad
f) Aurangzeb vi) Trading House
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
a) and iii) b) and v) c) and i) d) and vi)
e) and iv) f) and ii).
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
46 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
Other combinations are false.
Reviewer‟s Comment:
Question Number Type of question LOD
7 Match the following 2
Question
Match the following:
a) qasba i) fixed regulated market
b) ganj ii) wholesale market
c) Mandi iii) local production centre
d) arang iv) fixed country seat
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
a) and iv) b) and i) c) and ii) d) and iii)
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
Other combinations are false.
Reviewer‟s Comment:
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
47 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Question Number Type of question LOD
8 Match the following 2
Question
Match the following:
a) Saraaf i) Cloth dealers
b) Bazazas ii) Jewellers
c) Jouhuris iii) Money dealers
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
a) and iii) b) and i) c) and ii)
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
Other combinations are false.
Reviewer‟s Comment:
Question Number Type of question LOD
9 Multiple choice question 3
Question
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
48 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Which of the following states emerged after the decline of the Mughals:
a) North West Provinces
b) Rajput states
c) Hyderabad
Correct Answer /
Option(s)
c)
Justification/ Feedback for the correct answer
Hyderabad became an autonomous unit under Asaf Jah after Aurangzeb‟s death.
Resource/Hints/Feedback for the wrong answer
a): North-West Provinces [western U.P.] was a later English creation.
b): Autonomous Rajput states were recognized from Mughal times.
Reviewer‟s Comment:
1.1Glossary
Hundis: negotiable financial instruments or bills of exchange that evolved in India.
These were extensively used for the purposes of remittance and financing trade. Hundis
were in extensive use in the 18th century to transfer funds for rulers and merchants alike.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
49 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Khalsa: this referred to Crown lands where revenue was collected by central officials
and deposited in the central treasury.
Khyal: the principal genre of North Indian vocal art music. It is conventionally
associated with Ustad Neamat Khan Sadarang of the court of Muhammed Shah Rangila
(1719-48). Khyal compositions were composed in Urdu, Brajbhasha and even Persian.
Kirtana/ Kriti: a devotional song type that is the principal genre of South Indian
classical or Karnatik music. The majority of these compositions are in Telugu. 18th century
composers – Tyagaraja, Diksitar and Syama Sastri elaborated the form and brought to bear
on it their unique style.
Shahr e Ashob: refers to a genre of classic Urdu poetry that reflected personal
accounts and reactions of various poets to Mughal decline in the 18th century. One of the
earliest events that stimulated composition was the sack of Delhi by Nadir Shah. The major
poets who specialized in this genre were Mirza Rafi Sauda (1713-81) and Mir Taqi Mir
(1724-1810).
1.2 Glossary
Bazaar: Market
Bazazas: Cloth dealers
Diwani: Office, jurisdiction, emoluments of the diwan, the chief financial officer of the state
Ganj: Fixed regulated markets
Hundi: Indigenous bill of exchange
Jagir/Jagirdar: The public revenues of a land assigned for a term to a servant of the state -
the assignee was called the Jagirdar
Jouhuris: Jewellers
Mandi: Wholesale markets
Mansab/Mansabdar: Military rank conferred by the Mughal Government, the holder was
called the Mansabdar
Nawab: Viceroy, governor
Nizamat: Administration
Qasba: Fixed gentry seat
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
50 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Saltpetre: Literally salt of rock; potassium nitrate found naturally and used as ingredient for
gunpowder
Saraafs: Money dealers
Subedar/Subedari: Governor of province
Zamindar: Landholder, a collector of revenue on behalf of government
1.1Further readings
Alavi, Seema. 2002. ed. The Eighteenth Century (Debates in Indian History and Society).
New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Habib, Irfan. 1963. The Agrarian System of Mughal India, 1556-1707. London: Asia
Publishing House.
Alam, Muzaffar. 1986. The Crisis of Empire in Mughal North India: Awadh and the Punjab
1707-1748. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Bayly, C. A. 1983. Rulers, Townsmen and Bazaars: North Indian Society in the Age of
British expansion 1770-1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chandra, Satish. 1959. Parties and Politics at the Mughal court, 1707-1740. Aligarh.
Dasgupta, Ashin. 1970. Trade and Politics in 18th century India. In Islam and the Trade of
Asia: A Colloquium ed. D. S. Richards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wink, Andre. 1986. Land and sovereignty in India: Agrarian Society and Politics under the
Eighteenth century Maratha Svarajya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Subramanian, Lakshmi. 1996. Indigenous Capital and Imperial expansion: Bombay, Surat
and the west coast. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Alavi, Seema. 1995. The Sepoys and the Company: Tradition and Transition in Northern
India 1770-1830. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Grewal, J. S. 1995. The Sikhs of the Punjab. Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
1.2 Further readings
Alam, Muzaffar. 1986. The Crisis of Empire in Mughal North India: Awadh and Punjab,
1707-48. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Alam, Muzaffar and Sanjay Subrahmanyam, eds. 1998. The Mughal State, 1526-1750.
Delhi: Oxford University Press.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
51 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Alavi, Seema. ed. 2002. The Eighteenth Century in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Aston, T. H. and C. H. E. Philpin. 1985. The Brenner Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Athar Ali, M. 1968. The Mughal Nobility under Aurangzeb. Bombay: Aisa Publishing House.
Bayly, Christopher. 1983. Rulers, Townsmen and Bazars: North Indian Society in the Age of
British Expansion, 1770-1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bayly, Christopher and Sanjay Subrahmaniam. 1988. „Portfolio Capitalists and the Political
Economy of Early Modern India‟. Indian Economic and Social History Review, 25, 4.
Bose, Sugata and Ayesha Jalal. 1998. Modern South Asia: History, Culture, Political
Economy. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Chandra, Satish. 1979. Parties and Politics at the Mughal Court, 1707-1740. Delhi: People‟s
Publishing House.
Cohn, Bernard. 1960, 1987. „The Initial Impact on India: A Case Study of the Benares
Region‟. An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays. Delhi: Oxford University
Press.
Dasgupta, Ashin. 1970, 1998. „Trade and Politics in Eighteenth Century India‟. Muzaffar
Alam and Sanjay Subrahmanyam, The Mughal State. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Grover, B. R. 1966. „An Integrated Pattern of Commercial Life in the Rural Society of North
India During the 17th-18th centuries‟. Indian Records Commission.
Habib, Irfan. 1969, 1995. „Potentialities of Capitalist Development in India‟. Essays in Indian
History: Towards a Marxist Perception. Delhi: Tulika.
Habib, Irfan. 1999. The Agrarian System of Mughal India, 1556-1707. Delhi: Oxford
University Press.
Metcalf, Barbara D. and Thomas R. Metcalf. 2002. A Concise History of India. Delhi:
Cambridge University Press/ Foundation.
RayChaudhuri, Tapan. 1982. „The mid-eighteenth century background‟. Dharma Kumar ed.
Cambridge Economic History Vol. 2. Delhi: Cambridge University Press/ Orient Longman.
Richards, J. F. 1975. Mughal Administration in Golconda. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singh Chetan. 1988, 1998. „Conformity and Conflict : Tribes and the „Agrarian System‟ of
Mughal India‟. Muzaffar Alam and Sanjay Subrahmanyam, The Mughal State. Delhi: Oxford
University Press.
Stein, Burton. 1998. A History of India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Stein, Burton. 1989. „Eighteenth Century India: Another view‟. Studies in History, 5, 1, n.s.
India in the mid-eighteenth century: society, economy, polity
52 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi
Washbrook, David. 1993. „Land and Labour in Late Eighteenth-Century South India: The
Golden Age of the Pariah?‟. Peter Robb ed. Dalit Movements and the Meanings of Labour in
India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.