coLi I c rroN DEVELOPMENT IN [NDIRAGANDHI NATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE ARTS AND NEHRL MEMORIA! MUSEUM AND LIBRARY, NEW DELHI
DISSERTATION
SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF
^msttx of Hibrarp anJb
infonniition Science (2010-11)
By
NADEEM EHSAN Roil No. lO-LSM-12
Enrolment No. GA-9308
UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF
DR. SUDHARMA HARIDASAN (Associate Professor)
DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY
AL!GARH.202002 (INDIA)
2011
DS3903
I** • ^
Tb.
ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY, ALIGARH
DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND
INFORMATION SCIENCE
EPBX Direct Fax Res
2700916,20-22, 26 Ext. 19/39 0571-2700039,2700920 0571-2700039 0571-2501525
CERTIFICATE
This Is to certify that Mr. Nadeem Ehsan has completed his dissertation
entitled "Collection Development in Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and
Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi: A comparative study" in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Library and Information
Science (2010-2011). He has conducted the work under my supervision and
guidance.
I deem it fit for submission
Dr. Sudharma Haridasan
(Associate Professor)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
u In the name of ALLAH the most beneficial and merciful"
All praises to almighty ALLAH, the creator of all creations, the
cherisher, and the sustainer of the world, He endured me with the requisite
knowledge and ability to produce this piece of work. 1 bow down to him, in
gratitude with al humility from the depth of my heart.
I feel privileged in expressing my profound sense of gratitude to my
respected teacher and supervisor Dr. Sudharma Haridasn (Associate
Professor), in Department of Library and Information Science, A.M.U.,
Aligarh. It was her constant encouragement, valuable guidance and
assistance that enabled me to complete this work.
I pay my special thanks to my respected teacher and chairman of the
department, Dr. Naushad All, P.M. for his unfailing support, valueable
suggestion and for providing all facilities that made it possible to claim
accuracy in this work.
I owe my sincere thanks to my respected and co-operative teachers
Prof. Shaba hat Hussain, Mr. Mustafa K.Q. Zaidi, Dr. Nishat Fatima and
Dr. Mehtab Alam Ansari.
/ am also thankful to all non-teaching staff of the department specially
Mr. Riyaz Abbas, Mr. Asif, Mr. Zahid and Mr. Shahriq for their help and
encouragement in my work.
My sincere thanks to those who taught me what I knew not. / am also
thankful to my friends Tarique, Saif, Mumtaz, Humay Abdullah, Amir, K.K,
Sadaf and Muzzammil who encouraged me and wished for my success.
I am also thankful to my classmates and well-wishers.
I am indebted to my brothers Yasir, Shahzaib, Atif, Samar and Faisal for
their loving assistance.
Finally, no words could possibly express my deepest gratitude to my
loving parents Mr. Ehsan Bin Manzoor and Mrs. Shehnaz Fatima who
encouraged me to believe in hard work and not to worry about the result.
f U/%u.
Nadeem Ehsan
List of Tables
S.No. 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. 8.
9.
Tables Total Collection of IGNCA and NMML
Annual Budget Allocation (2010)
Annual Budget allocation for Books and Periodicals
Budget Allocation for different Categories of Sources
Selection of Reading materials
Documents Selection Tools
Resource Sharing Incoming Request of Books and Periodicals
Outgoing Request of Books and Periodicals
Page No. 51
53
55
56
58
59
60 61
63
List of Graphs
S.No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Figures Total Collection at IGNCA and NMML
Aimual Budget Allocation of IGNCA and NMML
Aimual Budget Allocation for different sources
Incoming Request for Documents at IGNCA
Outgoing Request for Documents at IGNCA
Page No.
52
54
57
62
64
Contents
List of Tables and Graphs
Page No.
Chapter-1
Introduction
Chapter-2
Special Libraries
Cliapter-3
Profiles of the Libraries
Chapter-4
Review of Related Literature
Chapter-5
Methodology
Chapter-6
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Chapter-7
Findings, Conclusion and Suggestions
1-12
Bibliography
Questionnaire
ABBREVIATIONS
NMML
IGNCA
CSL
CD-ROM
SDI
PPBS
CAS
E-Jouraal
CRC
E-Newspaper
SDC
ARL
OPAC
WWW
AMU
BHU
OCLC
Nehru Memorial Museum and Library
Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts
Central Secretariat Library
Compact Disk Read only Memory
Selective Dissemination of Information
Program planning budgeting system
Current Awareness Service
Electronic journal
Children Resource Centre
Electronic Newspaper
Special and Digital Collection
Advance Research Libraries
Online Public Access Catalogue
World Wide Web
Aligarh Muslim University
Banaras Hindu University
Online Computer Library Centre
t^^^(< yj^/^^
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
Collection Development
Collection development is a dynamic and continuous activity. It involves the
users, the library staff, and the subject experts of the selection team .It is not an
end in itself, but a means to develop a need-based, up-to-date, and balanced
collection fit to meet the document and information needs to the users.
Various steps involved in collection development are:
1. Analysis of the information needs of the users;
2. Formulation and implementation of selection policy to suit the objectives of
the library;
3. Acquisition programmes to build-up a balanced collection;
4. Resource sharing and its impact on collection development;
5. Weeding out programmes to ensure effectiveness of collection;
6. Collection evaluation.
The collection development is an efficiency audit aspect of a library, closely
linked with its use .The use is enhanced by the appropriate organization of the
Introduction
collection, accessibility to it, circulation of the documents, and the maintenance
of the collection .With the development of quantitative techniques and the
identification of various parameters of usage of documents, the collection
development process is tending towards objectivity .Ranganathan 's First Law
of Library Science Books are for use ,is however, a seminal guide for this
purpose.
DEFINITION AND MEANING OF COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT
Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science says "Library Collection is
the sum total of library materials - books, manuscripts, serials, government
documents, pamphlets, catalogues, reports, recordings, microfilm reels, micro
cards and microfiche, punched cards, computer tapes,etc.- that make up the
holdings of a particular library".
The term Collection Development has evolved to emphasize the need to
respond" to user's needs. Bloomfield (1987) says "to meet the demands,
librarians have evolved theories of collection development, which imply a more
active role in managing libraries.
Harrods's Librarian's Glossary (6th edition) defines collection development
as "the process of planning a stock acquisition programme not simply to cater
for immediate needs but to build a coherent and reliable collection over a
number of years, to meet the objectives of the services".
Collection development is sometimes considered as synonymous to "Collection
Building" which means that there is already nucleus of collection in the library
and the librarian is going to build up the collection. But collection development
Introduction
is a term other than collection building, since the word development implies
qualitative improvement of the collection.
That is why Shipman has said "Building a Collection may occasionally involve
the selection and acquisition of ...materials ab initio, but in most cases it is
likely to mean the planned systematic development of an already existing
collection".
Joseph C. Shipman
According to him collection development is "the sum total of library materials;
books, pamphlets, manuscripts, punched cards, serials, government documents,
microfiche and computer tapes etc. that makes up the holdings of particular
library. In other words, it is planned; systematic development of an already
existing collection.
G>L.Mosher
According to him "collection development is to build a library collection which
will supply a continuously expanding store of useful information to support and
enrich the programmes of its parent organization. In order to provide the best
materials for the implementation of its duties, the library requires guidelines for
the collection development .The policies which are, of necessity, subject to
review as needed, form the framework for building the library's collection".
Introduction
1. PURPOSE OF COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT
Collection development implies selection, acquisition and evaluation of the
library collection in order to see that both print and non-print materials that are
available in a library are really useful to the clientele. Collection development
therefore dispenses away with arbitrary selection and acquisition of documents.
Similarly it envisages periodic evaluation of the library stock both to improve
its Collection as also to weed out the irrelevant, outdated and unnecessary
documents from the library. It also means that users' needs should be kept in
mind while building up the collection. The purpose of collection development
now becomes clear.
Its purpose is to find out the users information/document needs to:
• Fulfill the library's obligation to the user community to provide
relevant and nascent information.
• find out the user's information/document needs,
• select and acquire documents that are really useftil to the clientele,
• adopt systematic and judicious spending on document collection,
keeping the objectives of the service in mind, and
• Periodically review the collection for weeding out unwanted and
outdated documents from it.
2. COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
Collection development is a continuous and never -ending activity, a well-
thought out long term policy is needed to accomplish the task of collection
development systematically. Such policy, besides other things, should provide
answer to the following:
a. "Who has the responsibility for seeing that a policy is setup and regularly
carried out?
Introduction
b. Who should have final authority for directing and controlling the distribution
of book funds?
c. What material should be acquired?
d. Who should participate in the selection?"
It is proper that the collection development policy is laid down by the highest
authority keeping in view such factors as the objectives of the organization,
information needs of the users, resources available, etc. The UGC Library
committee has assigned this responsibility to the top management of the
university -executive council or syndicate or academic council-or the library
advisory committee appointed by it.
3. PRICIPLES OF COLLECTION DEVELOPMET
There are some principles of selection. These Principles which guide the
librarian in making a judicious choice of a document .The production of
document today is enormous. Thousands of them are in wide varieties. With the
help of these, following principles one develops a meaningful collection of
documents in the libraries.
Selection of documents is both an art and a science .The following principles of
selections are most important and should be given weightage .They are as
follows:
a. Drury's Principles
The Basic Principles, which still governs the selection of reading material for a
library, was enunciated by Drury in 1930.1t states: "To provide the right book
to the right book to the right reader at the right time". The reader is the central
theme. A document is right or otherwise is in relation to a reader. It is to be
provided when the reader needs it for use. The selector should know the readers
and their requirements. He should select only that material which caters to the
5
Introduction
informational, educational and recreational needs of the readers. The selected
material should be procured expeditiously to be made available to the user
when he needs it. Knowing the needs of the readers and knowing the
documents which can meet these needs is important in making the selection of
documents, but more important this is the creation of an efficient mechanism to
ensure the availability of the selected material at the right time.
b. Dewey's Principle
Melvil Dewey's principle states: "the best reading for the largest number at the
least cost." According to this principle a library should select within the
financial resources available the best documents which may satisfy the
information needs of the maximum number of readers. The term 'best' means a
document which may be the best in its own field, the best that will be read, the
best of which good use will be made, the best that will answer a certain
demand. The best documents are those which satisfy the demands of the users
for recreation knowledge and study; the documents which cater the social and
cultural needs of the users.
c. Mc Colvin's Theory
L. R. Mc Colvin advanced his demand and supply theory of book Selection in
1925. He states, "Books in themselves are nothing. They have No more
meaning than the white paper on which they are printed, until they are made
serviceable by demand, the greater is the resultant and possible service". The
term 'supply' refers to the availability of reading materials in all its aspects and
varieties. 'Demand' on the other hand means expressed and unexpressed
information needs of the users.
Introduction
d. Ranganathan's Laws and Document Selection
Ranganathan's first three laws of library science are helpful in formulating the
principles of document selection. First law makes it obligatory that only those
documents should be selected which are of use to the clientele of a particular
library. While selecting the documents, the present and potential requirements
of the users must be kept in view. A school and public library should avoid the
selection of costly books which are not likely to be in frequent demand. For a
children library, the book should be illustrated, in bold type face and attractive
font. The second law "every book its reader" directs the selector to cater for the
information needs of all the users of the library. The subject or the language or
the style of exposition of documents to be selected should be in accordance
with the requirement of the users. This is possible only when the selector of the
document know the user and their requirements well. The third law of library
science "every reader his/her book" suggest that,all efforts should be made to
put to use those documents of value which have been selected in anticipation of
the needs of the users.
4. LIBRARY BUDGET
The term budgeting refers to the process of budget planning and preparation,
budgetary control and related procedures. The formal presentation of the plan is
called budget. Budget is a written statement of the income and expenditure
during the year. It covers all items of works to be taken up over a specified
period of time in future. Thus an overall budget covering the institution as a
whole is also known as master budget. A library budget is an estimate of
expected income and expenditure of the library for the coming year. Being
merely an estimate, it can be altered, due to change in circumstances.
Budgeting is usually done on yearly basis. The most central aspect of financial
Introduction
management of the library is the budget, which is a statement of income and
expenditure of the library. The budget provides guidance in spending the
appropriated funds through a period of time. It is also an instrument of control,
communication, coordination, evaluation, and motivation.
5. OBJECTIVES OF LIBRARY BUDGETING
The overall objective of library budgeting is to plan different phases of library
operations. Coordinate activities of different departments of the library and to
ensure effective control over it. Thus specific objectives are as follows:
1. To predict library's future services, services costs and other costs to achieve
desired goal.
2. To anticipate library's future financial condition and the future needs for
funds with a view to keeping the library active and up-to-date.
3. To coordinate the efforts to different departments and departments of the
library towards the common objectives.
4. To accelerate the efficiency of operations of different divisions and
departments of the library.
5. To fix responsibilities of different departmental heads.
6. To have effective control over the library's funds.
6. FACTORS EFFECTING BUDGET
1. Size of the library- collection, staff, users and services points.
2. Location.
3. Kinds of the library services.
4. Types of users.
5. Rising costs.
6. Periods covered (one year or more)
8
Introduction
There are few methods of preparing library budgets, which include both the
traditional approaches used by many organizations and more innovative ones
that have recently found their way into libraries.
7. METHODS OF LIBRARY BUDGET
a. LINE BY LINE ITEM BUDGET
In this type of budgets, the items of the expenditure are divided line by line,
into broad categories such as books and journals, salaries and allowances
equipments, contingencies etc. With further sub-divisions of each of these
broad categories. This is the usual traditional method which, by taking into
account past expenditure on each items, prepares the current budget. The
budget is prepared with small increase of say, 5-10% for each major item of
expenditure of the previous years' allocation, assuming that all current
programmes are good and necessary. This budgetary method does not go into
evaluation of activities and services of performance.
b. LUMP SUM BUDGET
In lump sum budget, a certain amount of money is allocated to the library. In
this, the library got freedom to decide as to how the amount is going to be
allocated to different categories.
c. FORMULA BUDGET
In formula budget predetermined standards are applied for allocation of money.
Such a budget is technical and easy to prepare. It does not require special skills
to prepare the same.
Introduction
d. PROGRAMME BUDGET
It does not estimate the expenditure on the basis of individual items. It is
focused on the activities that the Ubrary plans. Hence the budget is prepared on
the basis of the cost of programmes. Every year, the library has to decide
whether a programme has to continue, get modified, or deleted.
e. PERFORMANCE BUDGET
This method is similar to programme budget but in this method the emphasis is
given to performance in place of programmes. The expenditure is based on the
performance of the activities and the stress is given to operational efficiency.
The careful accumulation of quantitative data on all activities over a period of
time is required. Management techniques such as cost benefit analysis are used
to measure the performance and established norms. Hence this method
measures only the quantity not quality.
f. PLANNING PROGRAMMING BUDGETING SYSTEM
PPBS method combines the best of both programme budget and performance
budget, and focuses on planning. It begins with the establishment of goals and
objectives and ends with formulation of programmes or services. This method
combines the fiinctions of planning activities. Programmes and services,
translating them into tangible projects and finally presents the requirements in
budgetary terms.
g. ZERO BASED BUDGET
This method is similar to PPBS conceptually but does not take into accounted
that what happened in the past but emphasizes on the current activities. Every
programme and activity is spelled out in detail, and request for financial
10
Introduction
support for these has to be established afresh every year. In fact, no activity
could continue simply because that activity was undertaken previous year.
8. METHODS OF COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT
There are various methods for collection development which are as follows:
a. PURCHASE
It is the primary method of acquiring documents in a library. Library acquires
most documents by directly purchasing them from the publishers or agents if
there is no other way.
b. GIFT/DONATION
It is another source of developing the library's collection. No library can
potential to purchase all reading materials needed by the users of the library, so
up to some extent library rely on this method. Some publishers provide
specimen copies of the documents to the libraries. These specimen copies come
under the category of Gifts/Donations.
c. INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERSHIP
A library can have membership of the various institutions and learned societies
and than it can get the resources which are published by those learned societies.
d. DEPOSIT SYSTEM
It entitles some specially designated libraries to receive free copies of the
publications brought out by government, national and international
organizations.
11
Introduction
e. EXCHANGE
Exchange is another important method of building up library collection.
Exchange of materials between libraries, learned societies, institutions and
governments serve a number of purposes such as:
1. Procurement of out-of-print and rare books that can not be obtained from any
other source.
2. Acquiring publications which are not for sale or not distributed in the usual
book trade channels which are particularly true in case of foreign government
documents and reports.
3. Obtaining government publications on a regular basis.
4. Using to best advantage the duplicates of a library as well as its own
publications or those of the parent organization by offering them in return for
publications not represented in the library's collection.
Exchange also promotes goodwill among the libraries especially at the national
level.
12
<^^^Q:
Special Libraries
SPECIAL LIBRARIES
The term 'Special Library' means a library which is concemed almost exclusively
with the literature of a particular subject or group of the subjects. Special Library
serves, a special clientele located within a single establishment or group and all
engaged in working towards one common purpose Special library exists to serve the
personnel of the parent body and caters to their information needs.
Special library serves special clientele, group and is responsible for the Collection.
Storage, Organization, Retrieval and Dissemination of Information directly concemed
and auxiliary to the work of the specialized institution with which it is attached.
L DEFINITION
The following are the important definitions of special libraries:
J.E. Wright
J.E. Wright points out that "Special library" means a library which is concemed
almost exclusively with the literature of a particular subject.
L. H. Moriey
According to him "Special Library is that unit in the Organization responsible for
locating and supplying whatever knowledge and experience that may advance its
activities".
D.V. Arnold
"A Special Library is one, that serves a group of readers who have an 'extra library'
existence as a group."
13
Spedal Libraries
S.R. Ranganadian
Prefer to call it the "Specialist Libraiy" to supply detailed infonnation regarding some
subject field -Scientific, technological or othawise, the resource are SpeciaUzed and
the users are Specialists".
According to Ranganathan "the difference b/w general Library and Special Library
lay only in the nature of chentele and Has material or the document served".
2. FUNCTIONS OF SPECIAL LIBRARY
1. To collects maintains and store infonnation and data keeping in view the needs of
the organization.
2. Special Libraries analyze (synthesizes) and evaluate information and data.
3. To provide critical thought finding, reviews book on a single subject, monograph,
reports and/or collections.
4. To provide critical compilation.
5. To provide flie state-of the art report.
6. To provide rephes to quarries.
7. To provide reprint, bibliographies, and references.
8. To perform Uterature researches and translation services.
9. To provide abstracts, indexes and extracts.
10. To prepare accession Usts, bulletins, News-Letters, Summaries, Handbooks, or
Manuals.
11. To disseminate current information and SDI and thus stimulate research.
14
Svedal Libraries
12. To use ihter library loan to provide additional materials needed.
13. To maintain organizations archive through its staff.
3. TYPES
Special libraries on the basis of types can be divided into many categories, but broadly
they are divided into five categories. They are as follows :
a. Government
Government libraries are those libraries, which are attached to government offices and
departments. These libraries comes under different ministries. The collection of such
libraries is dominated by government documents, which are issued under the imprint
and authority of the government agencies or the expense of govemment whenever
required by the law.
b. Societies and Institutions
The basic purpose of societies and institutions is to formulate the developmental
plans, which require a wide range of information. For this purpose, they formed a
library which has collections of reference sources.
c. Industrial and Commercial Organizations
The collection of industrial libraries is different from other libraries. In addition to the
acquisition of books, journals etc, they also include internal (in-house) as well as
extemal (commercial) information.
d. Academic Institutions
A library attached to an academic institution, i.e. an institution engaged in teaching
and/or research and imparting formal education for students to aspire and complete a
particular course under prescribed syllabus.
15
Special Libraries
e. Public Libraries
Ranganathan defines a public library as "a institution maintained for and by the
community primarily for the social purpose of providing easy opportunity for self
education through out life of every person of the community".
4. COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT
Special library collections are working collection to support their information
services, with an emphasis on current information and retrospective material,
determined on the basis of projects and programms taken up by the organization.
Besides the traditional forms of material such as books, joumals, technical and
research reports other typical and significant material include patents, business
records, trade information and news clipping etc. A particular feature of collection in
special Ubrary is that it is never static, but dynamic and changing as new activities and
programs develop in present organization, the library also gets affected by changes in
parent oiganization and tiie scope and nature of collection and services also gets
changed suitably. Generally the special library has three major components;
a. Published information
b. Internally generated information and
c. Information available from sources outside the organization.
In most of the special hbraries, periodicals provide tiie most updated information.
Periodical collections are perhaps the richest of the Ubrary resources and the
maximum funds are provided for subscription of periodicals, specialized reports form
the second category of published information collected through newspaper clippings,
16
Svecial Libraries
pamphlets, statistical compilations, trade catalogues and government documents etc.
forai the other sources of information.
The second major component of the collection is information generated within
organizations, such as research and technical reports, news letters, sales literature and
competitive advertising etc.
Use of resources outside the organization is the third component of a special library
collection. Usually the special library has to depend on intemet for information and
material outside its scope of activities.
5. SERVICES OF SPECIAL LIBRARY
A special library is based on special subjects and special users will have to perform
completely different service. They have to deliver all kinds of "Document Service".
The main services of special library are given below:
a. Current Awareness Service (CAS)
This Service is provided on the anticipation of demand. It provides information in a
geno-al way or on broad bases, being a special library user's need information in a
specific way or in a specialized way.
b. Selective Dissemination of Information (SDI)
Special library provides SDI for keeping their users well informed by providing
document or information which they need. This service is basically provided by
library on demand as it deals with special topic as special user requirement.
c. Abstracting Services
Abstracting means concise form of information, special library prepares abstracts
usually in a specialized area. The Abstracts published and supplied regularly to the
17
special Libraries
users of special library. Abstracts of articles of journals are published at regular
intervals.
d. Indexing Services
It is the most important service provided by Special Library. Index is a systematic
guide to the items of a collection. By indexing service users can get information about
where the piece of information is located, so that it saves the time of the users.
e. Bibliographical Service
A Bibliography is an organized list of primary or otitier sources relating to a given
subject to assist specialists. It is usually arranged alphabetically by author or topic
wise.
f. Translation Service
In this service, foreign language documents are translated into otiier languages, so that
any user can use these documents. Apart from fliese services otiier services provided
by special library are same as in other libraries like lending services, reading room
services, reprography etc.
g. Document Delivery Service
The document delivery service is designed to provide access to material not held in
the library's collection. In this service either the original document or its copies or
translations are delivered to the users on demand.
h. Referral Service
The reference staff provides information about names, addresses, telephone numbers
and brief description of the persons and institutions, which may be able to provide
information to the users seeking information.
18
Profiles of the Libraries
PROFILES OF THE LIBRARIES
NEHRU MEMORIAL MUSEUM AND LIBRARY
The Nehru Memorial Museum and Library is a unique institution which
attempts to recollect, preserve and reconstruct tiie history of the anti-imperialist
struggle in India. An autonomous institution, set up by the Government of India
was founded m 1964 after the death of PtJawaharlal Nehru. It was then
decided that T e ^ Murti House should be converted into a museum and a
library which would cater to research on the Indian freedom movement and
aspects of contemporary history.
In addition, the institution has intensified its academic pursuits with a view to
strengthening the NMML as an institute for advanced study and centre of
excellence in research of international standards. The NMML attracts a large
number of scholars from across India and the world, through its socially
relevant academic discussions and seminars and through policy dialogue
discussion saries. The fellowship programme of the NMML continues to be
conducted in the proper academic sprit and seeks to uphold the Nehruvian
vision and contribute high standard interventions in day to day academic
debates.
COLLECTION
The library holdings roughly cover the period from the eighteenth century to
the preset times and deal with various aspects of modem and contemporary
history .The collections are massive and diverse -books, journals, photographs,
periodicals, newsps^o^, private papers and oral history records. Currently, the
library maintains a collection of more than 2.5 lakh printed books; over l.S
lakh photographs related to Nehru and the Indian freedom movement and
19
Profiles of the Libraries
around 8,000 audio tapes. Regular purchase of printed material and donations
by various individuals and institutions help in updating and expanding the
holdings of the library continuously.
The library contains a very rich and varied collection of books, journals,
photographs and other materials on microfilm and microfiche. Open to
bonafied researchers on a nominal fee, the library is an advanced research and
referrace institution on social sciences, with an emphasis on modem Indian
history. Its relevance is augmented by the archives of rare non-official research
materials, an Oral History section and multi-media library to record the
reminiscences of tilie makers of modem India and others who have contributed
in more recent times, as also a Centre for Contemporary Studies.
In the last four decades, scholars of modem and contemporaiy history have
found the institution ahnost indispoisable for carrying out their research. A
cursory glance on the acknowledgements appearing in books on modem Indian
history is a testimony to this reality. It is the biggest responsibility in the
country for microfihned newsp^>ers and private papor collections of eminent
individuals and at the same time of non-official social and political
oiganizations. The holding of the library covers a wide range of subjects related
to modem and contemporary history.
The Library has grouped its possession of published works about Jawaharlal
Nehm and issues/subjects related to him under the heading 'Nehruana'. This is
a collection of published books concerning Nehm-his writings; numerous
collections of his correspondence and speeches; academic works relating to
diverse aspects of his life, thoughts, politics and leadership. Similar collections
have been prepared for Mahatma Gandhi under the head 'Ganghiana' and for
Indira Gandhi under the title 'Indirana'. In the past few years, the library has
also buih upon a collection of published works on North-East India.
20
Profiles of the Libraries
The Library also houses an extensive collection of documents on microfilm
rolls and microfiche plates in the Microfilm Section. The newspapers,
periodicals and private p^ers dating back to 1838 are available on
approximately 18,500 microfilm rolls. Other rare documents are available on
more than 50,000 microfiche plates in this section.
Journal and periodicals are housed in a separate Periodical Section within the
Library. Currently this section maintains a collection of 497 journal is in
English, Hindi and other regional languages.
NMML also possesses an impressive collection of photographs of the freedom
movement in India and national leaders of the pre and post independence
period .This collection currently stands at more than 1.5 lakh photographs and
negatives of another one lakh images. It is housed in a Photo Section within
the library.
The Manuscript Section collects and preserves the private documents of
distinguished individuals and records of non-official institutions, associations
and societies which played a significant role in the fi'eedom struggle and the
development of modem India. It also continues to acquire the documents from
institutions and eminent Indians .Till now, more than a thousand precious
collections have been found here .These are preserved in 24,000 boxes which
run into more than five million pages. The growth of this division is an ongoing
process wherein it keqps acquiring new collections from different part of the
country. Some important collections include papers of Jawaharlal Nehru,
Mahatma Gandhi (Pyarelal P^ers),Mridula Sarabhai,
CRajs^opalachari, Jayaprakash Narayan, Vinoba Bhave, Dadabhai Naroji
,Bhulabhai E)esai,Syama Prasad Mookerjee,M.N.Roy,Sri Prakasa,Raj Kumari
Amrit Kaur,Rameshwari Nehru and others. The section also holds institutional
p^ers including those of institutions like all India Trade Union Congresss.All
21
Profiles of the Libraries
India Hindu Mahasabha, All India Women's Conference, Home Rule League,
British Indian Association, Ail India states People's Confidence and others.
Today, the Library houses not just an exhaustive collection of published
material on numerous aspects of modem and contemporary history but also
possesses an impressive and diverse archival holding. Regularly updated,
expanded and made available for research, these holdings make the NMML a
major academic destination for Indian and foreign scholars from diverse
disciplines and varied fields of interest
DIVISIONS
The various divisions of the NMML are:
1. Museum
2. Library
• Microfilm section
• Photo section
• Periodical section
3. Research Division
4. Centre for Contemporary Studies
5. Nehru Planetarium
6. Multi-media library
7. Children resource centre
S. Hindi Division (Rajbhasha Prabhag)
1. Museum
The Nehru Museum was designed as a personalia museum to present the life
and works of Jawaharlal Nehru through the visual media in the context of the
struggle for India's independence. The Museum thus portrays Nehru's ideas
and life as well as different facets of the Indian freedom movement. Being a
22
Profiles of the Libraries
personalia museum, parts of Teen Murti House-the reception room, bed room,
drawing room and study-have been preserved as they were during the lifetime
of Jawaharlal Nehru. Nehru's reconstruct the south block office of the External «
Affairs Ministry is located at the ground floor itself.
The Museum ingeniously display a series of inter-linked exhibitions depicting
the different phases of colonial history as well as the epic story of our struggle
for fi-eedom through contemporary photographs, photocopies of manuscripts,
letters, newsps^ers, periodicals and other documentary materials.
2. Library
Teen Murti House also houses a specialized library which has been designed
and developed as an advanced research and reference centre on colonial and
post-colonial India .Sponsoring fellowships for exploring new areas and issues
of research in social science.
3. Research Division
The Research Division comprises of four sections-the Manuscripts Section, the
Oral History Section, the Research and publications Section and the
Reprography Section.
4. Centre for Contemporary studies
The Centre for Contemporary Studies was set up as an advanced studies unit of
NMML in 1990 and is housed in the annexe building. Created with the purpose
of streaming research activities and providing an atmosphere conducive for
research, the C^tre is responsible for overlooking all research projects of
NMML.
23
Profiles of the Libraries
5. Nehru Planetarium
The only Planetarium in Delhi is housed in the Te«i Murti campus and was
established in 1984.The NMML took charge of the Planetarium from the
Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial fvrnd in 2005.With its various innovative and
informative shows like 'Our Cosmic Heritage', 'New Solar System' and 'Life
story of a Star', it enlightens its visitors about the mystaious of the sky.
6. Multi-Media library
Along with the CRC, this is the latest addition to the NMML inventory. This
unit uses new technology available to conduct audio-video recording of
prominent persons, freedom filters and others who have made a mark in their
respective fields. It is also responsible for creating resources by way of
documenting all programmes held at the NMML.
7. Children Resource Centre
The Children Resource Centre (CRC), which started m 2007 with a range of
open activities and events including Freedom Week and 150 years of 1857, has
evolved as a vibrant and lively unit of NMML. Its activities are aimed at
keeping alive the legacy of Pandit Nehru, who loved children, and of the
national freedom struggle and their values of democracy, secularism and peace.
8. Hindi Division (Rajbhasha Prabhag)
The objectives of Rajbhasha Prabhag (Hmdi Division) are to ensure compliance
with the ofGcial language policy of Government of India, i.e. the provisions
made in the Constitution of India (Part -XVII, Articles 343 to 351) regarding
OfQcial Language; The Official Languages (OL) Act, 1963; (as amended in
1967), the Government resolutions regarding Official Language, 1968; Official
24
Profiles of the Libraries
Languages (OL) Rules, 1976 and also to motivate staff members to achieve the
targets fixed in the annual programme issued by Department of Rajbhasha,
Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India for the progressive use of
Hindi language.
INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE ARTS
The Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts is the premier government
funded arts organization in India, as an autonomous institution under the
Department of Culture.The Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts,
established in memory of Smt. Indira Gandhi, is visualized as a centre
encompassing the study and experience of all the arts ~ each form with its own
integrity, yet within a dimension of mutual interdependence, interrelated with
nature, social structure and cosmology. The IGNCA was launched on 19
November, 1985 by the late Prime Minister Shri Rajiv Gandhi at a function.
The Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts Trust was constituted and
registered at New Delhi on 24th March 1987. The founder trustees of IGNCA
were Shri Rajiv Gandhi, Shri R. Venkataraman, Shri P.V. Narasimha Rao, Smt.
Pupul Jayakar, the Finance Minister of 1987, Shri H. Y. Sharada Prasad and Dr.
Kapila Vatsyayan.
COLLECTION
The Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts (IGNCA) has established a
digital library on indigenous cultural heritage, i.e. 'Kalasampada: Digital
Library Resource for Indian Cultural Heritage' (DL-RICH) with the support
from India's Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. It hosts
a Sanskrit text repository, called Gaudiya Grantha Mandira, diat covers more
than 400 chapters from different oriental texts. The digital corpus in this
25
Profiles of the Libraries
knowledge base includes ovor 0.5 million folios of manuscripts, slides,
digitized photographs, IGNCA published books, periodicals 'Kalakalp' and
'Vihangama', over 400 hours of audio and video, and approximately 50
walkthroughs. Some of the documents in the collections are not available to the
open access domain due to copyright restrictions. The IGNCA's archival
collection includes manuscripts, slides, rare books. Photographs, audio and
video along with highly researched publications of books, journals and
newsletters. Rare Photogr^hs digitized includes Rajah Deea Dayal collection,
Sambhu Nath Saha collection etc. About thousand hours of Audio / Video Film
& Video Documentation (online audio /video) is available in digital form out of
total collection of ovw 10000 hours. A part of the IGNCA's publications with
the various volumes of News Letters (Vihangama) and Kalakalpa: Bi-annual
Journal has been digitized.
DIVISIONS
The various divisions of IGNCA are:
l.KalaNidhi
2. Kala Kosa
3. Janapada Sampada
4. Kala Darsana
5. Kala Sampada
6. Sutradhara
26
Profiles of the Libraries
1. Kala NidM
Kala Nidhi is a library that homes a collection of multimedia database of all
Indian Heritage, humanities, arts and culture. The information system holds the
main resource bank that assists researchers and scholars to research and study
disciplines like archaeology, anthropology, philosophy, history, linguistics,
literature, arts and crafts and many more. It preserves a massive library of
microfilms and hard copies on the art and culture of India and all the Countries
undor the Asian Continent The collection of this library represents a major
portion of India's culture.
2. Kala Kosa
Kala Kosa is dedicated exclusively to the collection of all and any material
relating to the different Indian linguistics that fuses text with verbal, aural with
visuals, philosophical approach with scientific approach and theoretical
applications with practical Explications. This division studies, researches and
publishes all material and text relating to the concepts, fundamentals and usage
of the Indian languages that are centuries old and thus elaborating die
importance of this discipline within the umbrella of Indian Culture and their
traditions and at the same time displaymg those original languages that were
probably lost, hidden or unknown to the world either because they were never
published nor accessible to anyone.Kala Kosa also organises various
woricshops to educate young students across India on the significance of
Manuscripts and Paleogr^hy where Eminent Scholars from across India
participate to train these students on the study of ancient writing and
manuscripts like Brahmi, Gauri, Grantha, Lipi, Old Oriya, Sarada and Newari
etc. Other studies include d^ermination of date, decipherment of ancient date
formats, critical editing and proofreading etc.
27
Profiles of the Libraries
3. Janapada Sampada
Janapada Sampada was established in 1988 in view of engaging the study of
various Indian lifestyles. This division is dedicated to the study and research of
social, economic and cultural aspects of the Indian Art and Culture and hence
compliments the importance of the work done in Kala Kosa unit.
Kala Darsana provides a forum to address and discuss all creative aspects and
exchange dialogues about the various disciplines, societies, culture and arts that
envisage and presents these topics in a unique fa^on and hence also
compliments the work done in the Janapada Sampada division. They organise
exhibitions like 'Matigaih' which helps in advertising and accentuating the
diverse art and culture of India.
4. Kala Darsana
Kala Darsana provides a forum to address and discuss all creative aspects and
exchange dialogues about the various disciplines, societies, culture and arts that
envisage and presents these topics in a unique fashion and hence also
compliments the work done in tiie Janapada Sampada division. They organise
exhibitions like 'Matigarh' which helps in advertising and accentuating the
diverse art and culture of India.
5. Kala Sampada
Kala Sampada or the digital library homes the Cultural Informatics Lab or CIL
in short which was established in 1994 and uses technology to document,
preserve and make available all the information based on the various
disciplines and cultural heritage of India. Millions of resources like
Manuscripts, unique and rare books and photographs, video footages with
audio background are all packed in digital formats and available on computers
28
Profiles of the Libraries
to all scholars, lecturers, researchers and students to either acquire knowledge
or use it for educational purposes.
6. Sutradhara
Sutradhara acts as a central node that supports the organization's administrative
and managerial divisions. This division coordinates the administration,
Services, Demands, Supplies, International exchange of Information and
Dialogue, Account and Financial aspects of the other five functional units of
the Museum.
The IGNCA Museum opens on all days except National Holidays from 1000
hours to 1700 hours with no entry fee; however, photography and video fihning
are strictly prohibited for security reasons and protection of information.
29
Review ofRelaied Literature
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Study of related literature implies locating, acting and evaluating report of
research as well as report of casual observation and opinion that are related to
the individuals planned research projects.
In any worthwhile study in a field of research, the researchers must have an
adequate knowledge with the work that has akeady been done in the area of
their research. Research worker must have up to date information about what
has been thought and done in the area of their research.
The review literature should provide the reader with an explanation of the
theoretical rationale of the problem being studied as well as what research has
already been done and how the findings related to the problem at hand.
In brief, this chapter presents an overall review of studies conducted abroad as
well as in India in a chronological order regarding the topic. Investigator
reviewed only those studies which are similar to the present study or indirectly
related to the present study.
GrifBn, Melanie and Lewis, Barbara (2011)^ made a study under the title
Transforming special collections through innovative uses for LibGuides, this
article shows the utility of Springshare's LibGuides platform for special
collections repositories and to evaluate the collection guides which are built by
Special and Digital Collections at the University of South Florida in LibGuides.
The simplicity and easy-to-update fimctionahty of LibGuides works well for
USF's Special & EHgital Collections collection guides. SDC considers its initial
transition to LibGuides a success, it integrate the web presence for related
collections across formats and created collection guides that reflect the events
and research that the collections Inspire, The building collection guides in
30
Review of Related Literature
LibGuides has resulted in a website that more accurately reflects the
collections. In the early months of implementation, SDC also struggled with
branding the guides so that they would be immediately recognizable as both
products of USF as well as SDC. After the initial migration to LibGuides, the
USF Tampa's Library licensed Campus Guides, a related Springshare product
that allows for additional customization. This solution allowed SDC to have
greater control over the look and feel of LibGuides and to create a custom
banner that mirrors the design of the Tampa's Library.
Massis, Bruce E (2011)^ conducted a study under the title that what's New in
Libraries "Serendipitous" browsing versus library space which shows the
benefits of right collection development in the Ubrary. While library space is at
a premium on every college and university campus, even in light of access to
digital material, a considerable portion of the collection still must be available
in print, thus necessitating traditional shelf space, so that searching the physical
collection and browsing can occur. Balancing the two issues is a challenge to
each and every institution in its forward planning cycle.
Bonn, Jacqueline and Yi, Hua (2011)^ conducted a study under the title
assessing an academic library collection through capacity and usage indicators:
testing a multi-dimensional model. This p^er is to test a multi-dimensional
model of indicators for collection evaluation and to illustrate how to apply
these indicators in practice. In this article an analytical study was used to test
the use of the multi-dimensional collection evaluation model to assess an
academic library collection. The study defines the scope of the collection; focus
on two of the dimensional categories (capacity and usage) and identify
indicators for the two categories. This paper demonstrates that combining usage
indicators with capacity measurement (in terms of dollar expenditures)
31
Review of Related Literature
provides a powerful method of assessment with the potential to provide
valuable data. This study provides an accurate assessment of a library's
collection in the current information environment. It does not currently include
institutional repositories or locally created digital resources that will need to be
addressed in the fiiture as they mature and become more robust. Academic
libraries will have a reliable and sustainable model for the assessment of their
collections.This study shows the development of multi-dimensional model for
collection assessment and in the reliability and accuracy of the collection data it
provides.
Taler, Izabella (2011)'* discussed that multi-faceted study researched, identified
and compiled a con^rehensive list of book awards and prizes in the field of
Jewish Studies. The results showed an existence of a vast variety of available
awards that cover the Jewish studies. The analysis showed extensive subject
coverage of the awarded books and a strong presence of university presses
among the publishers of winning books. The paper demonstrated that the
Jewish book awards can easily be used as an altemate collection development
tool for building or evaluating Jewish Studies collections. The bibUographers of
Jewish studies in small and medium size non-sectarian academic libraries with
limited budgets can successfully integrate this approach in their efforts to best
support.
Little, Geoffrey (2011)^ discussed under the tide Collection Development in
Library and Information Science at ARL Libraries, that Collection development
practices and poUcies in LIS at ARL libraries that do not support an ALA
accredited degree vary from institution to institution. At the same time,
however, survey responses supported the author's initial (and perhaps
somewhat obvious) assumption that LIS collections primarily support library
32
Review of Related Literature
staff in their ongoing professional development and education. The study also
revealed that the majority of LIS selectors have multiple responsibihties in
public and technical library services. The budgets for collection are not large,
selectors receive relatively few requests for materials to be added to the
collection, and collecting parameters are defined so as to limit the relatively
inexpensive and practical EngUsh-language materials. While materials may be
found in library from OPACs or online lists of joumals and databases, less tiian
half of the librarians surveyed indicated that their library had either an online
subject guide/web site or a collection development policy for LIS, and most
LIS selectors are not listed Collection Development in Library and Information
Science at ARL Libraries in their institution's directory of subject specialists or
liaisons. To increase the visibility of their Collections and LIS as a discipline,
LIS selectors should attempt relatively simple, yet focused, outreach to promote
their collections through the creation of an online subject guide or web site.
Khan, Abdul Mannan (2010/ made a study under the title Managing collection
development and Organization in globalizing Indian university libraries, this
study identifies the current status of collection development organizational
pattems and makes a comparative analysis of collection development
organizational pattems of the four central university libraries i.e. Aligarh
Muslim University (AMU), Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Allahabad
University (ALU) and Baba Bhim Rao Ambedkar University (BBRAU).
Collection development in a university libraiy is a complex job and requires
carefiil insight and analysis of the clearly defined purpose. It is imperative to
formulate policies and programs by a committee or a group of faculty members
representing various faculties. It is also necessary to involve all the staff
members for developing a balanced collection. Collection development is a
vital and complex subject and its importance and significance is expected to
33
Review of Related Literature
increase by many leaps and bounds in the future. It is essential to establish and
maintain the quality and services of the collection for which the process of
selection and acquiring of information sources is to be carefully monitored.
Hence, the collection development process requires the setting up of an
efficient and up-to-date policy firamework to govem and gather procedures and
proceedings that aid the job of the involved professional managers and
facilitates the decision making by Ihem. The information policies have to be
dynamic in order to ad^t to the changing requirements of the organization and
provide mformation to its members.
Bolduc, Andre P.(2010)^ mad6 a study under tiie title collaborative collection
development: a Canadian-Indonesian initiative discuss that tiie library liaisons
are now back in Indonesia and have begun to take leadership roles in their
respective subject areas. Feedback has been positive from the new faculty
regarding the library collection that was built through our collaborative efforts,
and the materials are being used to support teaching and research at both
Jakarta and Yogyakarta. However, it will be important to monitor how the
value of the collection is perceived by its users as time unfolds. Developing and
administering regular user surveys could help to maintain an ongoing
awareness of the level of satisfaction towards the collection, which in turn
could allow changes to be made in order to better meet the needs of the user
community. The hope for the future is that the Indonesian government will
continue to fund the IIS programs in order to maintain the currency and
relevancy of the monogr^h collections in support of the developing
educational needs at both institutions. Cross-cultural collaborations can indeed
be rewarding experiences for all parties involved, but they do require the
development of imique skills. The need to negotiate around cultural differences
will involve advance preparation in order to be successful.
34
Review of Related Literature
Perrone, Agnese (2009) conducted a study under the title Electronic book
collection development in Italy: A case study reports the result of a research
project that aimed to investigate how academic librarians managed the
integration of electronic book collections in their library holdings and focuses
on the selection criteria and collection development issues in Italian academic
libraries that have been lately involved in electronic book collection
development projects and by the Italian digital pubUshing e-books. The paper
describes the case study carried out by the researcher for the dissertation of the
intemational master in information science jointly deUvered by Parma
university-Parma. Italy and North Umbria University -new castle upon type,
U.K. Two interviews and a questionnaire were done between February and July
2008 whereas the analyses of the results were done between February and July
2008 where as the analyses of the results were carried out between September
2008 and January 2009.Data were gathered through interview and through a
structured questionnaire. The data were analyzed following the guidelines
described in literature. On the other hand the answers to the interview questions
were transcribed.
Kavitha, R (2009)^ made a study under the title Collection development in
digital hbraries: trends and problems, this paper describes various trends in
collection development in digital environment. The changes in acquisition,
retrieval and storage of information due to technological developments have
been discussed. Limitations, restrictions and problems being faced by librarians
and readers due to the same have also been discussed. The way these
developments have affected the academic environment and changed the role of
librarian has also been portrayed. She concluded that "the new technology is in
no way in conflict with print document rather called hybrid libraries are the
35
Review of Related Literature
harmonious blend of tradition and modernity". Digital resources are affecting
collection development and management policies and are drawing attention to
two areas that have been neglected for too long in Indian libraries, namely how
do libraries change to meet the new searching habits of users on internet and
how do collection managers react to changing information needs of users. With
more and more resources available in digital format, the collection
development has to include these resources, thus making them easily accessible
to users. The policy should include these resources, thus making them easily
accessible to users. The policy should include these resources enabling their
selection, acquisition, preservation and distribution.
Sharma, Prangya Das and Ranjit Kumar, (2008)'^ conducted a study under the
title Collection Management of Engineering college Libraries of Orissa: An
evaluative study, this paper describe the proper appreciation of the impact of
technology or the concept of libraries and their services The strength and
weakness of the collection of the engineering college Ubraries and to provide
&e necessary guidelines for questionnaire method has been adopted to collect
information from respondents those are geographically scattered over thirty
districts in Orissa .The questionnaire has been divided into seven segments like
(l)Background Information (2)Library Collection (3)Library Budget
(4)Acquisition Pohcy (5)Library Services (6)Library Activities (7)Library
Automation. The fmding was to provide a clear picture about their
establishment, Organization, Services to users etc.
Darbey, Neil and Hayden, Helen (2008)̂ ^ conducted a study under the title
Special collections for beginners: A case study of special collections at
Waterford Institute of Technology Library Service, this article describes the
challenges and opportunities created by the presentation of a number of special
36
Review of Related Literature
collections to the library service of Waterford Institute of Technology and also
concluded that there was a delicate balancing act involved in accepting and
managing special collections in contemporary academic libraries. Key factors
to consider are expense, staff time and skills, and potential benefits to the
library and its users. It may not always be possible for senior administrators to
provide the financial and practical support that should go with such an
enhanced reputation for individual educational settings, but a reciprocal
responsibility needs to be shown to the collections if they are to be taken on at
all. The teams at WFT Library Service were aware of these issues and took a
pragmatic approach to the newly acquired collections. WIT has spent a
proportionately moderate budget on conservation, preservation and cataloguing
and will likely spend more in the future on digitization projects.
Adams, Brains and Noel, Bob (2008)^^ made a study entitled Circulation
statistics in the evaluation of collection development, this study aims to
describe how circulation statistics may be used to evaluate collection
development policies. The circulation statistics of books acquired by a science
library in a specific year are analyzed by publisher, publication date, and
subject. The paper finds that older books circulated more than recently
pubhshed titles purchased at the same time. Circulation averages varied
considerably between publishers. Checkouts are an imprecise measure of value.
Number of items not purchase costs was the denominator of all averages used;
there was a data bias against inexpensive books. The procedure can be used
generally to evaluate collection development policies.
James Bond, Trevor (2007)̂ ^ made a study stating the challenges involved in
collecting and managing digital photogr^hs and provide advice for Ubrarians
in appraising, formulating collection development policies, and negotiating
37
Review of Related Literature
,assisting in book selection and other work are the typical function of an
acquisition development ,if one exists out of eight library schools only two
have an independent course titled collection development and management
.Another two prefer to retain the old nomenclature ,building library collections
.A review of course descriptions reveals ,(^)no mention of the goals/objective
of the course ;(b)contents that are sketchy and widely variables;(c)absence of
electronic resources in course description;(d)use of basically lecture method of
teaching ;(e)dominance of old American and British texts ;(f)use of poor
assessment metiiod. There is a need of education in Pakistan about good
collection development.
Joint, Nicholas (2006)̂ ^ made a study under the title that Legal deposit and
collection development in a digital world. This paper emphasizes the social and
poUtical aspects of digital deposit issues, rather than the legal or technical
aspects. The essence of what was suggested here was quite simple: initial
investigations of how build the national digital legal deposit collections have
rightly emphasized preservation issues and the archiving of certain key
collections (government web sites and dual print/electronic publications). As
such, they do not give a complete basis for preserving a representative view of
what the national web space was like in the past. In consequence, fiirther work
on what constitutes a sound set of web-specific collection development
principles should be conmiissioned. The existing expertise of the LIS
profession is there to be drawn on and provides an excellent starting point for
such investigation.
Sullivan, Kathleen (2005)̂ ^ discussed that a collection manager explores
resource formats that may be in demand to meet changing user expectations.
Many of these expectations are driven by technology and the advent and
39
Review of Related Literature
popularity of computer games. Librarians will need to look first at the functions
users seek and then help fhem to match the format(s) that best meet these
needs. Collection managers will have to identify a variety of resources, offer
access across disciplinary lines and provide access, as much as possible, on a
24/7 basis. All of the formats discussed, and more, will be part of future
libraries' collections. Not all formats or functions will be required by all of the
users. However, there cannot be any doubt that function, rather than format,
wiU dictate the look and feel of future library collections.
Agee, Tim (2005)*^ made a study under the title Collection evaluation: a
foundation for collection development, this article is a guide for librarians,
although it was not an exhaustive accounting of collection evaluation methods.
Librarians have many strategies available for evaluating collections. This
article describes three major approaches to collection evaluation: user-centered
evaluation; physical assessment; and specific subject support. Each approach
employs a variety of specialized evaluative techniques. The benefit of using
any of these techniques was that a focus can be developed on any aspect -
subject, age, quality, or use - of the collection. Evaluating the collection allows
librarians to know what resources are already available, what may be needed,
and whether future collection development can be filled most effectively with
print or electronic resources. The results fi-om these techniques give
justification for investment of staff time and energy in evaluation projects.
Without collection evaluations that provide a clear assessment of available
resources, future collection management - budgeting, format consideration,
selection or deselection - may be inefficient and at risk. Librarians in large or
small libraries can employ the collection evaluation methods in this article to
gain meaningful information about their own holdings. Wise collection
40
Review of Related Literature
building is dep^dent on a foundation of current resource assessment. This
article provides some tools to build such a foundation successfully.
Sree Kumar, M.G and Sunitha, T. (2005)'^ conducted a study under the Title E-
Joumal Collection Development prospects: the IIM Consortium experience.
This study describes the numerous features of E-Joumals in the present day
library collection development and digital content management context. They
also illustrates a vivid picture about the need for concerted and coordinated
efforts or curbing the budgetary constraints ,a consortium of six IIM Libraries
in india,which took off as largely as 2000.The study also highlights the host of
issues and problems the consortium has been encountering and overcoming
from time to time.
Mandal, M and Panda, K C (2005)̂ ° provides an insight into the different
dimensions of collection development with specific reference to engineering
college (EC) Libraries. Analyses data on library collections received from 17
major EC Ubraries of West Bengal. The primary objective of this study was to
ascertain the present state of library collections and the infrastructure facilities
available in the engineering college libraries in west Bengal and to stress on the
use of online resources through an appropriate consortium to mitigate the
paucity of print journals and other E-resources in the respective EC libraries.
Questionnaire method was applied to elicit information on the present status of
the EC libraries in West Bengal. The present investigation is primarily a statiis
study relating to the computerization and collection development of EC
libraries in West Bengal. This survey has been conducted on the sample
libraries with tiie help of a structured questionnaire .A total of 17 EC libraries
(i.e.4 governments and 13 private) have been covered under this investigation:
out of 17 libraries within the purview of the study, 7 libraries have book
41
Review of Related Literature
collection within the range of 30 thousands collection one library falls within
80 thousand category and Ihe remaining one library has a collection of more
than 1 lakh volumes.
42
Review of Related Literature
REFERENCES
1. Melanie Griffin and Barbara Lewis (2011).Transforming special collections
through innovative uses for LibGuides. Co//ec//o/2 Building, 30(1)5-10.
2. Massis, Bruce E (2011). what's New in Libraries "Serendipitous" browsing
versus library space New Library World ,112(3/4), 178-182.
3. Borin, Jacqueline and Hua yi (2011). Assessing an academic library
collection through edacity and usage indicators: testing a multi-dimensional
modelCollection Building, 30(3), 120-125.
4. Taler, Izabella (2011). The Jewish Studies Book Awards: a collection
development strategy for non-sectarian academic libraries. Collection Building,
30(1), 11-38.
5. Little, Geofifrey (2011) .Collection development in library and information
science at ARL libraries. Collection Building, 30(3), 135-139.
6. Khan, Abdul Maiman (2010).Managing collection development and
Organization in globalizing Indian university hbraries. Collection Building,
29(1), 15-21.
7. Bolduc, Andre P (2010). Collaborative Collection Development: A
Canadian-Indonesian Initiative. Collection Building, 29(4), 124-130.
43
Review of Related Literature
8. Perrone, Agnese (2009).Electronic book collection development in Italy: A case study.
Retrieved July 20, 2009, from website: http://www.Ifla.org/files/hq/papers/ifla75/212-
perrone en. pdf
9. Kavitha, R (2009). Collection development in digital libraries: trends and
problems. Indian Journal of Science and Technology! (12), 68-73.
10. Sharma, Prangya Das and Ranjit Kumar (2008), Collection Management of
Engineering College Libraries of Orissa: An evaluative study. lASLIC Bulletin,
53(2),89-108.
11. Darbey, Neil and Hayden, Helen (2008). Special collections for beginners: A case
study of special collections at Waterford Institute of Technology Library Service,
109(5/6), 258-272.
12. Adams, Brains and Noel, Bob (2008). Circulation statistics in the
evaluation of collection development. Collection Building,27(2),7l-73.
13. James Bond, Trevor (2007). Collection Development for Digital
Photographs, library review, 56(2), 127-133.
14. Kaur, Sarbinder and Satija,M.P(2007), Collection Development in Digital
Environment itrends and problems. Collection Building ,PP.456-459.
15. Haider, S J (2006).Education for collection management/development in
Pakistan .Collection management, 31(4), 95-107.
16. Joint, Nicholas (2006).Legal deposit and collection development in a digital
viforld. Library Review, 55 (8), 468-473.
44
Review of Related Literature
17. Sullivan, Kathleen (2005).Collection development for the "chip" generation
and beyond. Collection Building, 24 (2), 56-60.
18. Agee, Tim (2005).Collection evaluation: a foundation for collection
development. Collection Building, 24(3), 92-95.
19. Sree Kumar, M.G and Sunitha, T. (2005), E-Joumal Collection
Development Prospects: the IIM Consortium experience, NACLIN, PP. 193-
205.
20. Mandal, M and Panda, K C (2005).Collection Development in the intemet
age and the need for a consortium in the engineering college libraries in West
Bengal: A study, SRELS journal of information management, 42(2), 155-172.
45
Methodology
Chapter-5
Methodology
This Chapter deals with the methodology used for conducting the study, and is discussed under the following headings:
1. Statement of the problem
2. Scope of the Study
3. Objectives of the study
4. Hypothesis
5. Variable Taken
6. Tools used for the study
7. Pilot Survey
8. Data Collection
9. Data Analysis
1. Statement of the problem
The Problem for the present study is entitled "Collection Development in Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi: A comparative study".
2. Scope of the Study The scope of the study confines to the analysis of the collection development of various categories like books, periodicals, audiovisual, microfihns, floppies, CD-ROMS, E-joumals etc during the last five years (2005-2010).The study analysis the book selection criteria and budget allocation in Nehru Memorial Museum and library and Indira Gandhi National Centre for tiie Arts, New Delhi.
46
Methodology
3. Objectives of the study
Following are the objectives of the study:
1. To study the collection of IGNCA and NMML, New Delhi.
2. To identify the type of documents in the collection at IGNCA and NMML, New Delhi.
3. To measure the Budget allocation for collection development in INGCA and NMML, New Delhi.
4. To compare the subscription of periodicals in IGNCA and NMML, New Delhi.
5. To leam about the document selection pohcy of IGNCA and NMML, New Delhi.
4. Hypothesis
To study the Collection Development in the Libraries of IGNCA and NMML, New Delhi, the following hypothesis have been formulated.
1. The Budgetary allocation in Nehru Memorial Museum and Library is more as compared to Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, New Delhi.
2. The annual expenditure on books and joumals is increasing in both the Libraries.
3. As no Library can claim to be self sufficient because of the ever increasing demands of the users, both the Libraries share their resources with other Libraries.
4. The PoUcy for Collection Development for Books and Periodicals in both the Libraries is based on User's Demand.
5. Variables Taiien
In order to achieve the objectives of the study and get meaningful conclusion the following variables are taken for detailed analysis:
• IGNCA Library • NMML Library
6. Tools used for the Study
The study used questionnaire method to collect the data from both the Libraries. The present study is conducted on a sample of two libraries of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi. Responses
47
Methodology
were obtained from the Librarians of both the Libraries and data was used for further analysis.
7. Pilot Survey
A study preceeding the main study usually to check the viability of the study design is known as pilot study or survey. A pilot survey was undertaken to ensure that the questionnaire was meaningful and to decide which questions were relevant for the purpose of the study. So, a pilot survey was undertaken which was useful in modifying the questionnaire.
8. Data Collection
To conduct the present study a questionnaire was prepared consisting of questions pertaining to such aspects as; Ubrary budget, library collection, selection of documents, selection tools and Inter Library Loan. The Questionnaire was used to collect the relevant data from the two libraries; it was personally collected from the libraries' annual report, web page, as well as by personally visiting the Libraries.
9. Data Analysis
The data collected through questionnaire, were organized and tabulated by using statistical methods, tables and percentage.
48
'^€1^2^
Data Analysis and Interpretation
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Collection Development
In a special library the policy of collection development should be in a systematic
way, that means to develop the collection and fulfill maximum user needs in a limited
budget. Collection development policy can be unwritten or a written document. The
American Library Association's guidelines for the formation of collection
development policies' assumed that, "a written collection development policy is for
any library a desirable tool which enables selector to work with greater consistency
towards defmed goals. Thus shaping stronger collections and using limited funds
wisely". A written collection development policy is preferred to non-written poUcy.
From time to time the library may have to review its collection development policy
due to policy changes of the funding agencies or the parental organizations.
Collection Development Policy of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts
The budget allocation is an important aspect of a successful collection
development and budgetary procedure. Success of libraries' collection
development depends upon the budget allocated to it. In the Indira Gandhi National
Centre for the Arts, there are six functional units i.e.
1. Janapada sampada
2. Kala Kosa
3. Kala Nidhi
4. Kaladarsana
5. Sutradhara Division
6. Cultural Informatics Media Centre
49
Data Analysis and Interpretation
All these units have their own budget allocated to them.
Selection Policy in Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts
Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts has a purchase cum selection
committee. The librarian is also a member of this selection committee.
These committees select books from different book selection tools and also those
documents that are selected or recommended by different units of IGNCA.
Collection Development Policy of Nehru Memorial Museum and Library
The budget is allocated to Nehru Memorial Museum and Library. This budget is
divided into two parts. From one part books and Periodicals are purchased and
from the second part Non Book Materials are purchased. All this is happened
under the budget allocation process.
Selection Policy in Nehru Memorial Museum and Library
The Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi also have a selection
committee in which the librarian is also a member. This committee selects the various
documents with the help of different book selection tools. The selection committee
uses Reviews in newspapers. Bibliographic Tools, Reviews in journals and
Publisher's catalogues. Sometimes Library Catalogues are also used as the selection
tools.
50
Data Analysis and Interpretation
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION The study conducted under the topic "Collection Development in Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and Nehru Memorial Museum and Libraiy, New Delhi: A comparative study" and the data collected is analysed as follows:
1. Total Collection
The total collection of both the libraries has been presented in tlie following table. The
Difference in Collection of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and Nehru
Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi are given below:
Table 1: Total Collec Name of tfie Library
IGNCA
NMML
Difference
tion oflGNCA and NMML Collection
3,88,668
2,74,841
+1,50,000 Photographs
36,173
4,24,841
The analysis of the above table shows that total collection of Indira Gandhi National
Centre for the Arts library and Nehru Memorial Museum and Library are 3, 88,668
and 4, 24,841 respectively. The collection of Neliru Memorial Museum and Libraiy
51
Data Analysis and Interpretation
exceeds by 36,173 from the total collection of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the
jArts. Nehru Memorial Museum and Library also have a collection of 1.5 lakhs
phot
ogra
Total Collection of IGNCA and NMML
430000
370000
Total Collection
IGNCA NMML
Libraries
Collection at IGNCA and NMML
ph.
It is
hous
ed in
a
phot
o
secti
on
with
in
the
libra
ry-
Figu re 1: Tota
1
The above chart shows the total collection of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi.
52
Data Anahsis and Interpretation
2. Library budget
The Library budget of both the libraries has been presented in the following tables,
i. Table 2 presents the annual budget allocated to Indira Gandhi National Centre for
the Arts and Nehru Memorial MuseUm and Library, New Delhi,
ii. Table 2.1 presents the armual budget allocated for books and periodicals to Indira
Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New
Delhi.
iii. Table 2.2 presents the budget allocated to various items in Indira Gandhi National
Centre for the Arts and Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi.
Table 2: Annual Budget Allocation (2010)
Name
IGNCA
NMML
Budget
6,25,00,000
50,00,00,000
The analysis of above table shows the total sum of Library budget of Indira Gandhi
National Centre for the Arts, New Delhi and Nehru Memorial Museum and Library,
New Delhi for the year 2010 is Rs.6,25,00,000 and Rs.50,00,00,000 respectively.
53
£>gtg Analysts ond Interpretation
500000000
450000000
400000000
350000000
^ 300000000 0
S. 250000000
"̂ 200000000
150000000
100000000
50000000
0
Annual Budget Aliocation (2010)
Budget
IGNCA <NiViK/,L
Libraries
Figure 2: Annual Batiget Allocation of lONCA s,m\ N!\f M!
The above chart shows the Libraries' total Budget of iiuiira Gandhi Nation/il Centre
::,, n. A;'V (iGNCA) ^ud ^dvn Mmaonal Museuiu and LiUary (NMML), New
Delhi.
54
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Table 2.1 presents the annual budget allocated for books and periodicals in both
the libraries during the last five years.
Table 2.1: Annual Budget allocation for Books and Periodicals
Libraries
IGNCA
NMML
ANNUAL BUDGET (2005-2010)
Books
05-06
22,56,250
45,12,500
06-07
22,56,250
45,12,500
07-08
22,56,250
45,12,500
08-09
23,75,000
48,80,520
09-10
25,00,000
50,00,000
Periodicals
05-06
12,26,606
28,66,908
06-07
12,26,606
28,66,908
07-08
12,26,606
28,66,908
08-09
12,26,606
30,13,266
09-10
15,00,000
30,13,266
The above table shows the annual budget allocated for Books and Periodicals in
Libraries of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and Nehru Memorial Museum
and Library. The above data shows that from 2005 to 2008 there is no change in the
budget allocation of both the libraries but after that from 2008 the budget allocation is
continuously increasing.
55
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Table 2.2 presents the budget allocated to various items for the year 2010.
Table 2.2: Budget Allocation for both the Libraries for the year 2010 Categories of Sources
Books
Periodicals
Audio visual
Microfilms
BUDGET ALLCATION (2010)
IGNCA
25,00,000
15,00,000
15,00,000
82,00,000
NMML
50,00,000
30,00,000
5,00,000
25,00,000
The Table-2.2 shows the Annual Budget Allocation for different source in both the
Libraries. The above table shows that IGNCA has an annual budget of Rs.25, 00,000
for Books whereas NMML has Rs.50, 00,000.1n terms of periodicals Nehru Memorial
has allocated just double of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, New Delhi. In
terms of Audio visual and Microfilms, this table shows that the budget of Indira
56
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Gandhi National Centre for the Arts (IGNCA) has three times more as compare to
Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (NMML), New Delhi.
Annual Budget Allocation for Categories of Sources (2010)
9000000
8000000
7000000
6000000
S 5000000 Q.
^ 4000000 IGNCA
NMML
Books Penodicais Audio visual
Microfilms
Categories of Sources
Figure 2.2: Annua! Budget Allocation for different sources
Die above chart shows the four Categories of Sources i.e. Books, Periodicals.
Audiovisuals and Microfilms. As the above Chart shows, the IGNCA has more than
S7
Data Analysis and Interpretation
three times budget for Audio visual and Microfilms as compare to NMML, New
Delhi. Whereas NMML has double budget for Books and Periodicals as compare to
IGNCA. The study reveals that no additional budget has been allocated to both the
Libraries during the years 2005-2010.
3. Selection of reading materials
The selection of study materials in the library of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the
Arts and Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi has been presented in the
table given below:-
Table-3: Selection of Reading materials
Reading Material
Books
Periodicals
Non Book Materials
IGNCA
Books Reviews, Publisher's Catalogue
User's Recommendation
Through Internet
NMML
Through Selection Committee
Through Selection Committee
Through Selection Committee
As the above Table 3 shows that the Selection Policy for Collection development in
Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, New Delhi is based on different
techniques of selection of documents where as the Selection Policy of Nehru
Memorial Museum and Library is similar for every type of document. In Nehru
Memorial Museum and Library they formed a book selection committee which is
responsible for the selection of study materials.
58
pgfg Afifilvflf gnti InttrgntPtfon
4. Selection tools The data collected on the documents selection tools used for the selection of
documents in the two libraries is shown in the table below:-
Table-4: Documents Selection Tools
IGNCA
Bibliographic Tools
Reviews in journals
Reviews in newspapers
Publisher's catalogue
NMML
Bibliographic Tools
Reviews in journals
Reviews in newspapers
Publisher's catalogue
Library Catalogues
The above table shows that both libraries of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the
Arts (IGNCA) and Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (NMML), New Delhi has
approximately using the same document selection tools, only Library Catalogues is
more used as a additional document selection tool at Nehru Memorial Museum and
Library.
5. Resource sharing
The data collected for the resource sharing in the Indira Gandhi National Centre for
the Arts and the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library during the last five years has
been shown in the table below:
59
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Year
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Table-6.1: Resource
IGNCA
Lalit kala Akadetni,
Sahitya Akademi,
Sangect Natak Akademi and
Central Secretariat Library.
Lalit kala Akademi,
Sahitya Akademi,
Sangeet Natak Akademi and
Central Secretariat Library
Lalit kala Akademi,
Sahitya Akademi,
Sangeet Natak Akademi and
Central Secretariat Library
Lalit kala Akademi,
Sahitya Akademi,
Sangeet Natak Akademi and
Central Secretariat Library
Lalit kala Akademi,
Sahitya Akademi,
Sangeet Natak Akademi and
Central Secretariat Library
Sharing
NMML
No
No
No
No
No
The above table shows that during the last five years Indira Gandhi National Centre
for the Arts, New Delhi is continuously sharing its resources with Lalitkala Akademi,
60
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Sahitya Akademi, Sangeet Natak, Akademi and CSL .Whereas Nehru Memorial
Museum and Library does not share the resources. All these Akademies have a large
collection on Indian culture.
i. Incoming Request for Documents
The data collected on the incoming request of Books and Periodicals in Indira Gandhi
National Centre for the Arts and the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library for the last
five years has been shown in the table below
Table-6.1: Incoming Request of Books and Periodicals
Years
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts
180
189
70
62
53
Nehru Memorial Museum and Library
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
The above table shows during the last five years Indira Gandhi National Centre for the
Arts, New Delhi has continuously received the incoming request for Books and
Periodicals from different library and information centers .In 2006-07 (IGNCA) has
received maximum incoming requests after that there is continuous fall m incoming
requests .Whereas the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library has never shared its
resources with any Library or Information Centre.
61
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Incoming Requests for Documents
2 0 0 - ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ H P ^ ^ I
180 •
160
140
1 120
& •s 100 o a>
1 80 z
60
40
20
1 1 •
n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
1 1 ^̂ 1
^ 1 1 fl i
i
. r ^^,|J g^^J
• Incoming Requests
2005-06 2006^7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Year
Figure 6: Incoming Request for Documents at IGNCA
The above chart shows the incoming request in Indira Gandhi National Centre for the
Arts during the last five years. After 2006-07 there is continuous fall in the incoming
request from different Library and Information Centers. In 2010 the number of
incoming requests was 53.
62
Data Analysis and Interpretation
ii. Outgoing Request for Documents
The data collected on the outgoing request of Books and Periodicals in Indira Gandhi
National Centre for the Arts and the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library for the last
five years is shown in the table below:
TabIe-6.1: Outgoing Request for Books and Periodicals
Years
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
IGNCA
82
84
53
38
22
NMML
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
The above table shows that during the last five years Indira Gandhi National Centre
for the Arts, New Delhi has continuously received the outgoing request for Books and
Periodicals from different library and information centers .In 2006-07 IGNCA got the
maximum outgoing requests after that there is continuous fall in reception of outgoing
requests .Whereas the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library has never shared its
resources with any Library or Information Centre.
63
DataAnajYsis and Intereretation
Outgoing Requests for Documents
I Outgoing Requests
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Year
2008-09 2009-10
Figure 6.1: Outgoing Request for Documcats at iCNCA
llic above chart shows the outgoing request of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the
Arts. This Chart shows that after 2006-07 tficrc is continuous decrease in the outgoing
requests for Books and Periodicals in Indira (3andhi National Centre for the Ans.
64
0^2^/
Conclusion, findines and Sue^estions
Chapter-7
FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
FINDINGS
The following are the major findings of the present study.
a. IGNCA and NMML have good collection of different kinds of
documents but comparatively the library of NMML has larger collection
than the library of IGNCA.
b. The library of NMML has a rich collection of Photographs of different
freedom movements.
c. The hbrary budget of NMML exceeds by the library of IGNCA.
Therefore, the budget allocation for different categories of sources in
NMML is consequently larger in comparison to that of IGNCA library.
d. In Nehm Memorial Museum and Library the selection of documents is
done by library committee. The Indira Gandhi National Centre for the
Arts selects its documents through a library committee along with user's
recommendation.
e. The selection tools used by both the libraries are almost same. NMML
also uses the library catalogues as a selection tool.
f. The pohcies of collection development are based on reader's demand.
g. IGNCA shares its resources with Lalit kala Akademi, Sahitya Akademi,
Sangeet Natak Akademi and CSL. Whereas the library of NMML never
shared its resources. IGNCA continuously gets incoming as well as
ongoing requests for documents.
65
Conclusion, findines and Su2eestions
TENABILITY OF HYPOTHESIS
The testing of the formulated hypothesis is given as below:
> Hypothesis 1
The Budgetary allocation in Nehru Memorial Museum and Library is more as
compared to Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, New Delhi.
As the Table 2 shows that the budgetary allocation for hidira Gandhi
National Centre for the Arts was Rs. 6,25,00,000 and for Nehru Memorial
Museum and Library was Rs. 50,00,00,000.Thus, the hypothesis is proved true.
> Hypothesis 2
The annual budget on books and journals is increasing in both the Libraries.
The Table 2.1 shows that the annual budget allocation for books and
journals in both the libraries is continuously increasing from the year
2007-08.Thus, the hypothesis is proved true.
> Hypothesis 3
As no Library can claim to be self sufficient because of the ever increasing
demands of the users, both the Libraries share their resources with other
Libraries.
As Table 6 shows the data collected relating to resource sharing in both
libraries that Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts is continuously sharing
the resources with Lalit kala Akademi,Sahitya Akademi,Sangeet Natak
Akademi, and Central Secretariat Library from a long period of time. Whereas
the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library has never shared their resources with
any library and information centre.Thus, the hypothesis is proved true.
66
Conclusion, findings and Sueeestions
> Hypotiiesis4
The Policy for Collection Development for Books and Periodicals io both the
Libraries is based on User's Demand.
As the Table 3 shows that the Selection Policy for Collection
development in Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, New Delhi is based
on user's recommendations as well as different techniques of selection of
documents. Whereas in Nehru Memorial Museum and Library the documents
is selected from the selection committee (which also accepts the user's
recommendations for documents). Thus, the hypothesis is partially
substantiated.
CONCLUSION
The present study is sought to examine the collection development in the
libraries of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts (IGNCA) and Nehru
Memorial Museum and Library (NMML), New Delhi. Most of the objectives
are met satisfactory and a very good collection of different types of documents
are available in both the libraries of Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts
(IGNCA) and Nehm Memorial Museum and Library (NMML), New Delhi.
SUGGESTIONS
The present study found the following suggestions to be implemented for the
collection development in the libraries of IGNCA and NMML.
1. The book selection tools used in both the Ubraries need to be supplemented
by using web sources, for the purpose of selection of documents.
67
Conciusion. findings and Suesestions
2. It is advisable to increase collection in these categories of sources also for
providing current and updated information.
3. There is a need for resource sharing facility in the Ubrary of NMML for
different and large collections.
4. Subscription of e-joumals may be encouraged.
68
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Adams, Brains and Noel, Bob (2008). Circulation statistics in the evaluation of
collection development. Collection Building,21 {2),71-73.
2. Agee, Tim (2005).Collection evaluation: a foundation for collection development.
Collection Building, 24(3), 92-95.
3. Bhatt, Sushil (2004). Collection Development of Banker institute of rural
development (pp.122) Lucknow: BBAU.
4. Bhattacharya, G (1982).Collection Development and document circulation in the
light of Ranganathan's five Laws.Banglore: DRTC Annual Seminar.
5. Bolduc, Andre P (2010). Collaborative Collection Development: A Canadian-
Indonesian Initiative. Collection Building, 29(4), 124-130.
6. Bonn, Jacqueline and Hua yi (2011). Assessing an academic Ubrary collection
through capacity and usage indicators: testing a multi-dimensional modei.Collection
Building 30(3), 120-125.
7. Chakrabarty, Ajit Kumar. (1983).A Treatise on Book Selection (PP.91).New Delhi:
D. K. Publication.
8. Darbey, Neil and Hayden, Helen (2008). Special collections for beginners: A case study of
special collections at Waterford Institute of Technology Library Service, 109(5/6), 258-272.
9.Dhiman, Anil Kumar. (2008).A Handbook of Special libraries and
Librarianship(pp.376). New Delhi: Ess Ess Publication.
69
10. Dhiman, Anil K. (2006).Leam Library Management (pp.29).New Delhi: Ess Ess
Publication.
11. Haider, S J (2006).Education for collection management/development in Pakistan
.Collection management, 31(4), 95-107.
12. James Bond, Trevor (2007).Collection Development for Digital Photographs,
library review, 56(2), 127-133.
13. Joint, Nicholas (2006).Legal deposit and collection development in a digital
world. Library Review, 55 (8), 468-473.
14. Kaur, Sarbinder and Satija,M.P(2007), Collection Development in Digital
Environment :trends and problems. Collection Building ,PP.456-459.
15. Kavitha, R (2009). Collection development in digital libraries: trends and
problems. Indian Journal of Science and Technology! (12), 68-73.
16. Khan, Abdul Mannan (2010).Managing collection development and Organization
in globalizing Indian university libraries. Collection Building,
29(1), 15-21.
17. Little, Geoffrey (2011) .Collection development in library and information science
at ARL libraries. Collection Building, 30(3), 135-139.
70
18. Mandal, M and Panda, K C (2005).Collection Development in the internet age and
the need for a consortium in the engineering college libraries in West Bengal: A
study, SRELS journal of information management, 42(2), 155-172.
19. Massis, Brace E (2011). what's New in Libraries "Serendipitous" browsing
versus library space New Library World ,112(3/4), 178-182.
20. Perrone, Agnese (2009).Electronic book collection development in Italy; A case study.
Retrieved July 20,2009, from website; http;//www.Ifla.org/files/hq/papers/ifla75/212-perrone en.
21. Sharma, Prangya Das and Ranjit Kumar (2008), Collection Management of
Engineering College Libraries of Orissa: An evaluative study. lASLIC Bulletin,
53(2),89-108.
22. Sree Kumar, M.G and Sunitha, T. (2005), E-Joumal Collection Development
Prospects: the IIM Consortium experience, NACLIN, PP. 193-205.
23. SulUvan, Kathleen (2005).CoUection development for the "chip" generation and
beyond. Collection Building, 24 (2), 56-60.
24. Taler, Izabella (2011). The Jewish Studies Book Awards: a collection
development strategy for non-sectarian academic libraries. Collection Building, 30(1),
11-38.
25. Melanie Griffin and Barbara Lewis (2011).Transforming special collections
through innovative uses for lAhGmdQS.Collection Building, 30(1)5-10.
71
26. Gupta,Arjun Das.(1998).Collection Development in Indian University Library
developing horizons in Library and Information Science. New Delhi:
27. Harrods, L.M. (1971).Librarian's Glossary of terms. London: Andrew Deutsch.
28. http://www.ignca.gov.in
29. http:,'/wvvw.ignca.nic.in/pdf datii/'about ClL.Pdf
30. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/spccial Libraiy
31 ,http://sodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/dxml^itst^eam/handle/1944/l 614/24 .pdfPseque
nce=l
32. http://www.nmml.nic.in
33. http://www.nehrumemorial.com
34. IGNOU (1998).Collection Development. New Delhi.
35. Jain, M.K. (1998).50 Years Library and Information Services in India
(pp.57).New Delhi: Shipra Publication.
36). Jain, M.K. 50 years of Libraiy and Information Service in India.(pp.95).New
Delhi.Ess Ess Publication.
37). Khanna, J.K. Library and society (pp.80).2"** .rev. ed. New Delhi. Ess Ess
PubUcation.
72
38. Khanna, J.K. (1997).Library and society (pp.30).New Delhi: Ess Ess Publication.
39. Krishna, Kumar. (I993).Libraiy Manual (pp.l6).New Delhi: Ess Ess PubUcation.
40. Krishan Kumar. Library Organization.(PP.72).New Delhi.Vikas pubUshing.
41. Krishan Kumar. Reference Service (pp.98).2"'̂ .rev.ed.New Delhi. Vikas
Publishing.
42. Kaula, p.n. (1977).Library Building Planning and desigw(pp.79)New DelhiiVikas
Pubhcation.
43. Lai, C. & Kumar. (2007). Descriptive Questions in Library and Infonnation
Science. New Delhi: Ess Ess Publication.
44. Mittal, R.L. (1964) Library Administration: Theory and practice
(pp.l64).New Delhi: Metropolitan book co.
45. Mittal, R.L, (1964) Libraiy Administration; Theoiy and practice (pp.l47).New
Delhi: MetropoUtan book co.
46. Mosi.er, G,f.. (1972).Book Selection (pp.21 l).Massachusetts:M.I.T Press.
47. Pandey S.K. Shanna. Libraiy and society . (pp.49).2"'' .rev. ed. New Delhi.
Metropohtan,New Delhi.
73
48. Prasher, R.G. (1993).Developmg Library Collection (PP.15).New Delhi:
Medallion Press.
49. Random House dictionary of English languages. (1964). (pp.193). New York:
Random House.
50. Ranganathan, S .R. (1990).Reference services and bibliography: Vol 1
(pp.25).Madras Library Association.
51. Sengpta, Benoyendra. (1983).Book Selection (pp.l),Calcutta: World Press.
52. Shipman, Joseph C. (1975).collection building (pp.177).Colorado: Library
Unlimited.
53. Stuasl, Robert D. and Eastlick, jolui Taylor (1977).Library Management (pp.166).
Littleton: Libraries Unlimited.
54. Wiight, J.E. (1955).Manuai of special Library Technique Loiiuon: Aslib,
55. Youngj Heaiisiill (1983). ALA glossaiy of libiaiy and iiiformatioii science
(pp. 198). Chicago: American Library Association.
QUESTIONNAIRE ON
COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT IN INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE ARTS AND NEHRU MEMORIAL MUSEUM AND LIBRARY, NEW DELHI: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.
Name of the librarian__
E-mail:
1. Total Space of the library
2. Total collection of the library
3. Please indicate the collection in the following categories with the average annual intake for
Categories of Sources
Books Periodicals Audiovisual Microfilms/fiches Floppies CD-ROMs E-Joumals
2005-06
-
Year 2006-07
wise collection 2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
- -
4. How much is the total budget allocated for collection development
a. Plan
b. Non plan.
5. How much is the library's annual budget allocation for
a. Books
b. Periodicals
c. Audiovisual
d. Microfilms/fiches
e. Floppies
f. CD-ROMs
g. E-joumals
6. Is there any other grant/fimding available for purchasing library resources. If yes please give details of the last five years
Session 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Amount
—
7. Is this grant/funding meant to develop all round collection.
a. Yes ( )
b.NoO
If yes, then what percentage of this grant was allocated to?
Categories of Sources
Books
Periodicals
Audiovisual
Microfilms/fiches
Floppies CD-ROMs
E-Joumals
Year wise collection 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
— —
8. Selection of study material in the library is done by (Please tick in the brackets)
a. Librarian ( )
b. Library committee ( )
c. Teachers' recommendation ( )
d. Students' recommendation ( )
e. Any other ( )
9. Please indicate the selection tool/tools used for the selection of study materials by the library
1. Bibliographic Tools
a. International Bibliographies
b. National Bibliographies
c. Publisher's Catalogues
d. Library Catalogues
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
2. Reviews in journals
a. International Reviews [ ]
b. National Reviews [ ]
3. Any Others
If yes, then please indicate here
10. Please mention the Methods for Evaluation of the Collection
11. What is the selection policy for collection development followed by the library for
Books
Periodicals
Non book Materials
12. Subscription of e-joumals is done by
13. Subscription of print journals is done by
a. Recommendation of department ( )
b. Purchase committee ( )
14. Subscription of print+online journals is done by
a. Recommendation of department ( )
b. Purchase conmiittee ( )
C. User's Recommendation ( )
d. Internet ( )
RESOURCE SHARING
15. Does your library have resource sharing facility?
a.Yes( )
b. No ( )
If yes, then please write down how it is carried
16. Give the names of library and information centers with which your library has resource sharing arrangement
Session 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Lib.and Info.Centres.
• - — - — - -
—-
17. Please provide the number of outgoing request processed within the last five years
Session 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Outgoing Request
18. Please provide the number of incoming request processed within the last five years
Session 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Incommg Request
Any other suggestion
Thank You
Nadeem Ehsan