+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Date post: 13-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: danghuong
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
29
Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations. Enrico Maria Marone, MD Associated Professor of Vascular Surgery University of Pavia - Italy San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milano, Italy
Transcript
Page 1: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Success Factors of DCB, Technical

and Clinical Considerations.

Enrico Maria Marone, MD Associated Professor of Vascular Surgery

University of Pavia - Italy

San Raffaele Scientific Institute – Milano, Italy

Page 2: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

• I, Enrico Maria Marone have the following

conflict of interest in the context of the

subject of this presentation:

- Biotronik (consultant)

- Cordis (consultant)

- Terumo (consultant)

Page 3: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Passeo-18 Balloon Catheter

Ø (mm) 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0,

5.0 mm

L (mm) :40, 80, 120

Balloon Platform

Improves ease of handling

Protects the user and balloon from contact and damage

SafeGuard Insertion Aid

Drug: paclitaxel (3.0 μg/mm2)

Excipient: butyryl-tri-hexyl citrate (BTHC)

Process: Micro-pipetting

Coating Technology

Passeo-18 Lux combines proven

technologies for treating lower limb arteries

Page 4: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Design of SafeGuard Insertion Aid

Distal end Raised Portion Crimped End

SafeGuard Insertion Aid

It is pre-mounted on the balloon and does not require any

preparation prior to use

Improves ease of handling and protects coating and

physician during device preparation.

Page 5: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Protects the user and coating from contact and damage

Reduces drug loss due to friction with the introducer sheath

valve by up to 94%

94%

*Passeo-18 Lux 4/120/130 with Cordis Avanti Plus 4F, 11 cm, w & w/o SafeGuard insertion aid

SafeGuard Insertion Aid Ease and Safety of Handling

Page 6: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

– Rapid drug transfer into vessel

– Sustained therapeutic effect in local tissue while

remaining non-toxic

– Homogeneous drug coating (longitudinal,

circumferential, thickness)

– Homogeneous drug concentration throughout the

coating

– Minimal drug loss during tracking and inflation

– Balance between coating adhesion and drug transfer

Baseline considerations for the development of Passeo-18 Lux

Page 7: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Paclitaxel blocks the cell cycle directly

Paclitaxel inhibits the cell cycle directly vs. Limus drugs which act indirectly

DCB‘s aim for a high-dose effect of Paclitaxel, causing cell‘s mitotic arrest

A low-dose effect is expected to sustain antiproliferation long term

Mode of action for Paclitaxel and Limus drugs

Page 8: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

– The excipient is used to balance coating

adhesion and drug release properties

– The excipient aims to ensure a micro-

crystalline Paclitaxel structure and make the

compound more absorbable to the tissue

– The excipient is designed to improve

effectiveness and time of drug retention in

the arterial tissue

Excipients play a key role in DCB

technologies

Page 9: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

0

1000

2000

3000

1 hr 24 hrs 72 hrs

ng/

mg

Tissue Concentration

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5 min 30 min 1 hr 3 hrs 24hrs

ng/

mL

Blood Concentration

5 min 30 min 1 hr 3 hrs 24 hrs

3346.7 11.0 6.2 2.4 0.4

712.8 7.6 5.1 3.4 1.8

Non-atherosclerotic Rabbit Iliac Model – 28 days

PTX + Iopromide

PTX Only PTX + Iopromide (SeQuent)

Excipients improve tissue uptake of

Paclitaxel

PTX only

Source: Virmani, presented at Linc 2012

Page 10: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Excipient Butyryl-Trihexyl Citrate (BTHC)

Common uses of BTHC

Used in medical devices & cosmetics

Additive in blood bags to keep the crystalline structure of the plastic malleable

Safe: it is approved to be dissolved into the blood and used in the body

Metabolism Quickly metabolized by the body and excreted via urine,

bile and expired air¹

Degrades to citric acid and alcohol (n-hexanol¹)

BTHC is hydrophobic and less dissolvable in blood and

saline/water used during interventional procedures

compared to other common hydrophilic excipients

1 European Commission SCENIHR Report Feb 2008

Lux coating technology uses BTHC as excipient Biocompatible, safe and effective

Characteristics

Page 11: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

BTHC improves coating integrity and

durability

Coating characteristics are

modified when surface is

wettened

Hydrophilic excipients are

more soluble and degrade

faster

Hydrophobic excipients

improve coating integrity

ensuring more drug is

available at the lesion site

Device Excipient Type Solubility*

Passeo-18 Lux Butyryl-trihexyl citrate (BTHC) Hydrophobic Very low

Lutonix Polysorbate/sorbitol Hydrophilic/

hydrophobic Fast dissolving

In.Pact Urea Hydrophilic Fast dissolving

*In water

**Data on file at BIOTRONIK (IIB Test)

50.0%

75.0%

100.0%

Passeo-18 Lux Lutonix 035

% o

f to

tal d

rug

load

Coating Integrity* After submerging and deployment of a 5x40mm

balloon in physiological solution at 37ºC

50.0%

75.0%

100.0%

Passeo-18 Lux In.Pact Admiral

% o

f to

tal d

rug

load

Coating Integrity* After submerging and deployment of a 5x40mm

balloon in physiological solution at 37ºC

Page 12: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Passeo-18 Lux delivers sufficient drug to

give long lasting therapeutic effect

A high tissue concentration is achieved after balloon inflation Drug concentration rapidly declines within 7d Therapeutic effect is sustained beyond 28d Prolonged presence of drug in vessel tissue is important for

clinical efficacy SFA Porcine model

Page 13: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Lux coating technology achieves uniform

drug distribution to the vessel wall

3D-surface plot of fluorescence intensity

Drug distribution in target arterial tissue in rabbit iliac model

PTX, DAPI, max intensity z-projection at 400x Whole sample scan of fluorescently labeled Paclitaxel in a rabbit iliac artery

Page 14: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

PASSEO-18 LUX CLINICAL TRIAL

PROGRAM

Study Device(s) Indication Design Primary

Endpoint PI(s)

Passeo-18 Lux

vs. Passeo-18 SFA

EU Multicenter FIM RCT

(60 pts/5 sites) LLL @6m D. Scheinert

Passeo-18 Lux

vs. Passeo-18 BTK

EU Multicenter FIM RCT

(72 pts/6 sites)

MAE@1m

PP@6m T. Zeller

Passeo-18 Lux

Infrainguinal

Arteries

Global Multicenter All-comers

Registry

(min. 700 pts/55 sites)

MAE@6m

FTLR@12m G. Tepe

Passeo-18 Lux

+ Pulsar-18 SFA

EU Multicenter Single-arm trial

(120 pts/5 sites) PP@12m M. Bosiers

Passeo-18 Lux

vs. PTA

AV Fistula

Access

Canadian Multicenter RCT

(120 pts/4 sites) LLL@6m E. Terasse

Passeo-18 Lux

+ Pulsar-18 SFA

Australian Single-arm trial

(100 pts)

PP@12m

PP@24m P. Mwipatayi

Passeo-18 Lux In-stent

restenosis

Australian Retrospective

registries

(35* pts / 29° pts)

PP, FTLR, MAE

@6m

P. Myers*

D. Robertson°

*Investigator-Initiated Trials

*

*

*

*

Page 15: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

BIOLUX P-I:

PASSEO-18 LUX DCB PROVEN IN THE SFA

60 patients

DCB Passeo-18 Lux

N=30

POBA Passeo-18

N=30

12 mo FUP N=25

12 mo FUP N=26

1:1

6 mo FUP LLL 0.51 ± 0.72 mm

BR 11.5%

6 mo FUP LLL 1.04 ± 1.00 mm

BR 34.6%

Study Design

DESIGN:

Prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized controlled trial for

treatment of femoro-popliteal arteries.

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:

Prof. D. Scheinert, Leipzig, Germany

PRIMARY ENDPOINT:

6 mo LLL in TL measured by QVA1

SECONDARY ENDPOINTS:

6 mo Binary Restenosis

6 mo and 12 mo TLR

6 mo and 12 mo change in mean ABI and RC

6 mo and 12 mo MAE2

BIOLUX P-I 12 Months Results: Scheinert D. presented at TCT 2013

p= 0.033* p= 0.048*

1 Assessed by an independent core laboratory using Quantitative

Vascular Angiography (QVA)

2MAE = procedure or device-related death or amputation, TL

thrombosis, clinically driven TLR

p* < 0.05 significant

Page 16: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

6 MONTHS ANGIOGRAPHIC RESULTS EVALUATED BY AN INDEPENDENT CORE LABORATORY

Variable DCB

N=30

POBA

N=30 p-value*

Reference Vessel Diameter [mm] 4.4 ± 0.8 4.8 ± 0.9 0.144

In Segment DS [%] 36.5 ± 18.5 47.5 ± 20.8 0.048*

In Segment Late Loss [mm] 0.5 ± 0.7 1.0 ± 1.0 0.033*

In Segment Binary Restenosis 3 11.5% 9 34.6% 0.048*

Thrombus 0 0% 1 3.8% 1.000

p* < 0.05 significant

Page 17: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

12 MONTHS CLINICAL OUTCOMES ADJUDICATED BY AN INDEPENDENT CLINICAL EVENTS COMMITTEE

Ankle Brachial Index

DCB

N=25

POBA

N=26 p-Value*

Kaplan-Meier Estimates

Freedom from clinically driven TLR (As-Treated Population) 84.0% 47.1% 0.020*

Freedom from amputation 96.2% 96.0% 0.954

Freedom from Target Lesion Thrombosis 100.0% 100.0% 1.000

Freedom from procedure or device related death 100.0% 100.0% 1.000

Major Adverse Event Rate

(hierachical, adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events

Committee)

80.8% 58.8% 0.140

Improvement in Rutherford Classification 17 72.0% 15 65.2% -

BIOLUX P-I 12 Months Results: Zeller T. presented at EuroPCR 2013

p* < 0.05 significant

Page 18: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

CLINICAL CONCLUSIONS

In the ‘as treated’ population at 12 months, Passeo-18 Lux demonstrated significant improvement in freedom from TLR of 84.0% vs. 47.1% in the POBA group.

More patients improved in Rutherford Classification in the DCB group than in the control group with 72.0% vs. 65.2%.

Passeo-18 Lux demonstrated a significant reduction in late luminal loss and binary restenosis at 6 months compared to the control PTA balloon

Late loss was 0.51 ± 0.72 mm and 1.04 ± 1.00 mm in the

Passeo-18 Lux and Control group respectively (p= 0.033*)

Binary restenosis was 11.5% in the study group vs. 34.6% in the control group (p= 0.048*)

p* < 0.05 significant

Page 19: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

BIOLUX P-II STUDY

PASSEO-18 LUX IN BTK ARTERIES

72 patients with symptomatic PAOD or CLI (Rutherford 2-5)

DCB Passeo-18 Lux

N=36

POBA Passeo-18

N=36

FUP N=30 Withdrawals N=3

Early Termination N= 3 (Death N= 2,

Amputation N= 1)

6-mo FUP

FUP N=33 Withdrawals N=0

Early Termination N= 3 (Death N= 1,

Amputation N= 2)

1:1

1 MAE = all cause death, major amputation of target extremity, TLR ,

TVR, target lesion thrombosis, adjudicated by an independent

Clinical Events Committee

2 Assessed by an independent core laboratory via Quantitative

Vascular Angiography (QVA) 12 mo Clinical FUP

FUP N=35 Withdrawals N=1

Early Termination N=0 (Death N= 0, Amputation

N= 0)

FUP N=35 Withdrawals N=0

Early Termination N= 1 (Death N= 0,

Amputation N= 1)

30 days FUP

DESIGN:

Prospective, international, multicenter, 1:1 RCT

DCB vs. POBA, for the treatment of stenosis and

occlusion of the infrapopliteal arteries.

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:

Prof. T. Zeller, Bad Krozingen (DE)

PRIMARY ENDPOINT:

30 Days Major Adverse Event1 (MAE) rate

6-month patency in target lesion measured by

Quantitative Vascular Angiography (QVA).

SECONDARY ENDPOINTS:

Device, technical and procedural success.

TLR at 6 and 12 mo.

Change in ABI and Rutherford Class at 1, 6, 12 mo.

BIOLUX P-II: Brodmann M. presented at LINC 2014

Page 20: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Evaluated by an

independent core

laboratory

DCB

N=50

POBA

N=54

p-value*

Lesion location

Anterior Tibial Artery 24 48.0% 25 46.3%

0.693

Posterior Tibial Artery 11 22.0% 12 22.2%

Peroneal Artery 7 14.0% 11 20.4%

Tibioperoneal Trunk 5 10.0% 2 3.7%

Other 3 6.0% 4 7.4%

Calcification

None 19 38.0% 31 57.4% 0.018*

Mild 6 12.0% 4 7.4% 0.501

Moderate 1 2.0% 0 0.0% 0.472

Moderately severe 3 6.0% 1 1.9% 0.338

Severe 5 10.0% 2 3.7% 0.243

N/A 16 32.0% 16 29.6%

DCB POBA

Mean # lesions

per patient 1.4 ± 0.6 1.5 ± 0.6

p=0.334

p=0.317

p=1.000

BIOLUX P-II: Brodmann M Presented at LINC 2014

p* < 0.05 significant

LESION/PROCEDURAL CHARACTERISTICS EVALUATED BY AN INDEPENDENT CORE LABORATORY

Page 21: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Death Major

Amputation TLR TVR

TL

Thrombosis

DCB (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

POBA (%)

[CI] 0.0%

2.8%

[0.4-18.1]

5.6%

[1.4-20.7]

5.6%

[1.4-20.7] 0.0%

p-value - 1.000 0.493 0.493 -

p* < 0.05 significant

BIOLUX P-II: Brodmann M Presented at LINC 2014

MAJOR ADVERSE EVENTS AT 30 DAYS ADJUDICATED BY AN INDEPENDENT CLINICAL EVENTS COMMITTEE

Time to Event (days)

POBA 8.3% [2.8 – 23.7]

DCB 0.0% [0.0 – 0.0] 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0 30

MAE (%)

p-value : 0.239

(Fisher‘s exact)

p-value : 0.239 (Fisher‘s Exact)

Page 22: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

BIOLUX P-II: Brodmann M Presented at LINC 2014

0.0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Time to Event (days)

0 30 60 90 120 150 180

POBA 75.9% [61.4 – 85.6]

DEB 82.4% [66.5 – 91.2]

p-value : 0.452

(Log Rank)

TL PRIMARY PATENCY AT 6 MONTHS EVALUATED BY AN INDEPENDENT CORE LABORATORY

p* < 0.05 significant

Page 23: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

RUTHERFORD CHANGE SHOWS SIGNIFICANT

IMPROVEMENT IN CLASS 5 PATIENTS TREATED

WITH PASSEO-18 LUX

POBA at 6 M: Improvement: 47%

Worsening: 6%

DCB 6 MONTH FUP

BASELINE 0 1 2 3 4 5 NAV

0 - - - - - - -

1 - - - - - - -

2 - 1 - - - - -

3 3 - 1 1 - - 2

4 1 - - - 1 - -

5 8 - - 2 - 9 7

NAV

POBA 6 MONTH FUP

BASELINE 0 1 2 3 4 5 NAV

0 - - - - - - -

1 - - - - - - -

2 - 2 - - - 1 -

3 2 2 - 1 - - -

4 1 - - - - 1 -

5 8 - - - - 14 4

NAV

0 01

7

2

26

12

1 13

1

9

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 1 2 3 4 5

Base

6M FUP

0 0

3

5

2

26

11

4

01

0

16

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 1 2 3 4 5

Base

6M FUP

p=0.001*

p=0.001*

p* < 0.05 significant

p=0.046* p=0.046*

p=0.001*

DCB at 6 M: Improvement: 59%

Worsening: 0% p=0.002*

Page 24: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

MAJOR AMPUTATIONS AT 12 MONTHS ADJUDICATED BY AN INDEPENDENT CLINICAL EVENTS COMMITTEE

POBA 5.7% [1.5 – 21.0]

DCB 3.3% [0.5 – 21.4] p-value : 0.655

(log-rank)

Time to Event (days)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0 30 180

p* < 0.05 significant

365

No additional amputations after 180 days

Page 25: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

At 30 days clinical results show MAE composite of 0.0% for the Passeo 18

Lux vs. 8.3% compared to the control PTA balloon (p=0.239).

At 6 months angiographic follow-up, Passeo-18 Lux DEB demonstrated a

target lesion primary patency of 82.4% vs. 75.9% compared to the control

PTA balloon (p=0.452).

At 6 months, 59% of patients improved in Rutherford Classification in the

DEB group vs. 47% in the control group. No patients worsened in the DEB

group, vs. 6% in the POBA group.

Improvement of Rutherford Class 5 patients at 6 months was significant in

the DEB group (p=0.002*) compared to the POBA group.

The Passeo 18 LUX is safe – demonstrated in a low amputation rate and

no additional amputations beyond 180 days

CONCLUSIONS

p* < 0.05 significant

Page 26: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

BIOLUX P-III: ‘REAL’ ALL-COMERS REGISTRY CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02276313

DESIGN: Prospective, international, multi-centre, open label, all-comers registry to expand and understand the safety and efficacy data on the Passeo-18 Lux DCB in a real world population of subjects with obstructive disease of the infrainguinal arteries.

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Prof. G. Tepe, Klinikum Rosenheim, Germany PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: Clinical: Major Adverse Events (MAE) at 6 months Performance: Freedom from clinically-driven TLR at 12 months DEDICATED SUBGROUPS: Diabetes; Renal Insufficiency, TASC C&D lesions; Heavily calcified lesions; Rutherford 3+; 65 yrs+.

>700 subjects with de novo or restenotic

lesions in the infrainguinal arteries

55 sites world-wide

12 months: freedom from C-TLR,

primary patency, MAE, change in ABI,

RC, Amputation-free survival, QoL

6 months: MAE, change in ABI, RC,

Amputation-free survival, QoL

Passeo-18 Lux

24 months: freedom from C-TLR,

primary patency, MAE, change in ABI,

RC, Amputation-free survival, QoL

Page 27: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Principal Investigator: Prof. Patrice Mwipatayi, Perth Australia Study Design: Prospective, multicentre feasibility study investigating safety and efficacy of BMS + DCB in SFA TASC C/D lesions. N=65 enrolled (51pts reached 24m f/u) Study Devices: Pulsar-18 SE stent (full segment coverage), followed immediately by Passeo-18 Lux DCB (full segment coverage) Primary Endpoint: Primary Patency (PP) at 12 and 24 months. Defined as an increase in the PSVR ≥ 2.5 with no clinically driven re-intervention at the stented segment ± within 5mm of each side of the stented area

24m Results Primary Patency (51pts) PARAMETER N (%) RANGE

Total Lesion Length

(mm) 187.55 80-300

Calcification

Minimal 31.4 --

Moderate 43.1 --

Severe 23.5 --

No. of Stents 1.57 1-3

No. of DEBs 2.45 1-5

Source: Mwipatayi P. Presented at LINC 2015

DEBAS

12m: 99.2%

24m: 88.2%

Page 28: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

BIOLUX 4EVER study Investigate Passeo-18 Lux DCB combined with Pulsar SE stent

DESIGN: Multicentre, international registry of 120 patients to evaluate the short- and long-term (up to 24 months) outcome of treatment with Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon and Pulsar-18 stent implantation in symptomatic (RC 2-4) fem-pop arterial lesions.

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Dr M. Bosiers, Dendermonde, Belgium

PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Primary patency at 12 months, (freedom from >50% restenosis as indicated by an independently verified PSVR <2.5 in the target vessel with no re-intervention)

SECONDARY ENDPOINTS: (selected) Primary patency rate at 6- & 24-month follow-up, Freedom from TLR at 1-, 6-, 12- & 24-month follow-up Technical Success Puncture Site Complications Clinical success at follow-up (improvement of RC)

120 patients in c.6 clinical sites in Europe 37% enrolled

12 months: PP, FTLR, change in ABI, RC

6 months: PP, FTLR, change in ABI, RC

Passeo-18 Lux + Pulsar

24 months: PP, FTLR, change in ABI, RC

Page 29: Success Factors of DCB, Technical and Clinical Considerations

Lux coating technology

Summary:

– The Lux coating formulation and process have been optimized to ensure sufficient

drug is delivered to the target lesion site

– The Lux technology achieves homogeneous drug concentration to the vessel wall

– Lux coating is safe and clinically proven to reduce restenosis in both coronary and

peripheral arteries


Recommended