+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Success or Failure? - King County, Washington · 2014. 9. 22. · Success or Failure? Department of...

Success or Failure? - King County, Washington · 2014. 9. 22. · Success or Failure? Department of...

Date post: 13-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
24
Chautauqua Beach Chautauqua Beach Culvert Replacement Project #3 Culvert Replacement Project #3 - - 1645 1645 Project Date: July 2007 Project Date: July 2007 Success or Failure? Success or Failure? Department of Transportation Road Services Division Road Maintenance Section
Transcript

Chautauqua BeachChautauqua BeachCulvert Replacement Project #3Culvert Replacement Project #3--16451645

Project Date: July 2007Project Date: July 2007

Success or Failure?Success or Failure?

Department of TransportationRoad Services DivisionRoad Maintenance Section

Potential Road FailurePotential Road FailureChautauqua Beach Road SWChautauqua Beach Road SW

Chautauqua Beach Vicinity MapChautauqua Beach Vicinity Map

Puget Sound

Tramp Harbor

Culvert Replacement Project Site

Ellisp

ort C

ree

k

Vashon Island

Road Maintenance Road Maintenance Environmental UnitEnvironmental Unit

Culvert OutletsCulvert Outlets

Project SiteProject SiteLeft: Ellisport Creek Culvert Inlets

Bottom: Ellisport Creek Upstream

Road Maintenance Design PlansRoad Maintenance Design Plans

Chautauqua BeachChautauqua Beach

HistoryHistory

The property was developed as a lumber The property was developed as a lumber mill, millpond, and greenhouses for mill, millpond, and greenhouses for growing vegetables.growing vegetables.

Harrington – Beall Greenhouses, 1928.

The fuel was stored onThe fuel was stored on--site in two large site in two large above ground storage tanks and was also above ground storage tanks and was also used to fuel greenhouses on the island.used to fuel greenhouses on the island.

The operations used heavy Bunker C fuel The operations used heavy Bunker C fuel oil imported by barge.oil imported by barge.

Past Site Past Site InvestigationsInvestigations

King County Department of Natural King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks conducted a site Resources and Parks conducted a site investigation in 1998.investigation in 1998.

AGI Technologies conducted a limited Phase AGI Technologies conducted a limited Phase II site assessment in 1999.II site assessment in 1999.

1999 AGI Investigation Sample Locations1999 AGI Investigation Sample Locations

Enclosed Conc. Structure

Oil Tank Foundation

S4

S3

S5

S2

S6

S7 / W1S8S9

S10

S11

S13S14

S15

S16S17

S12

S1

= Soil Sample Location (S#)

# = Test Pit Location

= Groundwater Sample Location (W1)

AGI Sampling Event

July 13, 1999

1999 AGI Laboratory Results1999 AGI Laboratory Results

S11

S8S7 / W1

S4S6

S3

26

3

4

= Test Pits= Hand Auger Samples

Sample locations with detectable TPH concentrations

AGI Investigation FindingsAGI Investigation Findings

Contamination most likely a result from tank leakage of Bunker C fuel oil.

Free product is centered around the former storage tanks in an area approximately 220 feet long by up to 100 feet wide.

Free product area is located west of Ellisport Creek and north of Chautauqua Beach Road SW.

No evidence of TPH contamination in Ellisport Creek.

2006 CDM Investigation2006 CDM Investigation

FWS-3

FWS-1 / FWS-2

FWS-4

FWS-5

MS-1MS-2

MS-3

Sampling Event July 5, 2006

CDM CDM StudyStudy

Road Maintenance Road Maintenance Environmental SamplingEnvironmental Sampling

Goal: Determine the extent of potential soil & Goal: Determine the extent of potential soil & water contamination within the project footprintwater contamination within the project footprint

Road Maintenance Site InvestigationRoad Maintenance Site Investigation

Sampling Event

February 17, 2004

= Hand Auger Sample Location

= Well Boring Sample Location

Results showed minimal contaminant levels in the soils and no detectable concentrations in ground-water within the project footprint.

CHA09

CHA08CHA07

CHA05

CHA02

Sample sites with detectable TPH concentrations

Chautauqua Beach Project 2007Chautauqua Beach Project 2007

SuRPRISESuRPRISE & Horror& Horrorat Chautauqua Beachat Chautauqua Beach

SuspenseSuspense at Chautauqua Beachat Chautauqua BeachProject becomesProject becomes

Chautauqua Beach Project 2007Chautauqua Beach Project 2007

Test Pits with Oil Contamination Present

Pumping contaminated water to Baker Tanks

Chautauqua Beach Project 2007Chautauqua Beach Project 2007

Findings of petroleum contamination within the project footprint drives Managements' decision to cancel the project.

Chautauqua Beach Chautauqua Beach TreatTreatSpill Response Training & Experience Spill Response Training & Experience of Road Maintenance personnelof Road Maintenance personnel……And quick action of Environmental staff And quick action of Environmental staff and Road Maintenance crews and Road Maintenance crews prevented petroleum contamination prevented petroleum contamination from reaching Puget Sound.from reaching Puget Sound.

Lessons LearnedLessons LearnedThorough planning, site Thorough planning, site assessments and scientific assessments and scientific analysis works analysis works mostmost of the timeof the time

Plan for worst case scenarios; Plan for worst case scenarios; there is always the unknownthere is always the unknown

Subsurface investigations are Subsurface investigations are by design limited in their ability by design limited in their ability to find all sources of to find all sources of contamination within the extent contamination within the extent of the project areaof the project area

QuestionsQuestions

Road Services Division, Road Maintenance Section [email protected]

Questions and Comments to: Doug Navetski, Environmental Scientist III

Thank You!


Recommended