Date post: | 16-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Health & Medicine |
Upload: | saba-basit |
View: | 682 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
Success Rate of Miniplate Anchorage for Bone Anchored
Maxillary Protraction Eline E. B. De Clercka ; Gwen R. J. Swennenb(Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011)
Dr. Saba BasitMCPS ResidentOrthodontics
2
AIM and OBJECTIVE :
Aim of this prospective study was to evaluate
the success rate of Bollard miniplate anchorage for BAMP in growing children.
3
What is a Miniplate?
Temporary skeletal anchorage device.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics May 2014 Vol 145 Issue 5
4
USES OF MINIPLATES:
1. Difficult cases with complex problems 2. Surgical orthodontics a) Class 3 patients after mandibular set back and
maxillary advancement. b) Distalization and intrusion of maxillary posteriors.3. Orthopedic treatment. 4. Backup system of miniscrews
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics May 2014 Vol 145 Issue 5
5
USES cont.
1. Difficult cases with complex problems
a) Bimaxillary posterior teeth distilization to avoid premolar extractions.
b) Skeletal open-bite with class II malocclusion requiring distalization plus intrusion of molars.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics May 2014 Vol 145 Issue 5
6
Maxillary Posterior Teeth Distilization to Avoid Premolar Extractions
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics May 2014 Vol 145 Issue 5
7
Skeletal Open-bite with Class II Malocclusion Requiring DISTALIZATION & INTRUSION of Molars
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics May 2014 Vol 145 Issue 5
8
Uses cont.2. Surgical orthodontics
In Class III patients, immediately after mandibular setback or maxillary advancement miniplates are implanted at the zygomatic buttress and mandibular body during orthognathic surgery.
Miniplates are applied to distalize and intrude the maxillary posterior teeth and/or protract the mandibular dentition.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics May 2014 Vol 145 Issue 5
9
Molar intrusion with miniplates
Miniplate in Zygomatic Arch
Mandibular setbackAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics May 2014 Vol 145 Issue 5
Surgical Orthodontics
10
Molar Intrusion:
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics May 2014 Vol 145 Issue 5
11
4. Orthopedic Treatment
Skeletal class III patients with poor compliance with a face mask.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics May 2014 Vol 145 Issue 5
12
Orthopedic Treatment
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics May 2014 Vol 145 Issue 5
13
Maxillary Protraction :
Why we need? In class III patients
Mandibular Prognathism Maxillary Retrognathism
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics May 2014 Vol 145 Issue 5
14
Maxillary Hypoplasia
Delaire in the 1970’s Delaire face mask
Disadvantages:• Noncompliance • Dentoalveolar compensation• Clockwise rotation of the mandible
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
15
Materials And Method:
25 patients - 7 males & 18 females. - Mean age – 12 yrs
All had (BAMP) without corticotomy or osteotomy with the use of class III elastics between miniplate skeletal anchorage in the upper and lower jaw.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
16
Materials And Method cont.. Minimal invasive flap was raised.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
17
In the upper jaw, ‘‘Upper Bollards with hooks’’ were placed at the right
and left infrazygomatic crest.
In the lower jaw, ‘‘Lower Bollards with hooks’’ were placed on both sides between the lower canine and the lateral incisor.
Materials And Method cont..
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
18
In all patients, the Bollard miniplates were fixed with monocortical Titamed Bollard Miniplate Screws .
Materials And Method cont..
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
19
In the first six patients, self-tapping screws were used, and in the following 19 patients, self-drilling screws were applied.
A single dose of IV antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) was given
during surgery.
Postsurgical instructions were given to all patients
Materials And Method cont..
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
20
Loading of Bollard modified miniplates with 150 g elastics was initiated 17 to 18days after
surgery .
Maintained for a period of 12 months.
Materials And Method cont..
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
21
RESULTS:
In 25 consecutive patients, 99 Bollard modified miniplates could be placed with excellent primary stability under general anesthesia.
In the lower jaw, miniplates could be placed in all patients between the lateral incisor and the canine. No infections occurred.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
22
The overall success rate in terms of stability of Bollard miniplate anchorage was 97%.
Five different patients showed signs of mobility with small discomfort. In these cases, loading was interrupted for 2 months.
Two miniplates became stable again, and three miniplates needed to be removed and replaced under local anesthesia 3 months later.
In two patients, fracture of a hook of the miniplate occurred and was solved by insertion of a custom-made hook .
RESULTS cont.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
23
DISCUSSION:
BAMP is the most critical procedure regarding stability and patient morbidity in the use of miniplate anchorage in orthodontics.
Initial mechanical retention of is mainly influenced by the thickness and density of the external cortical bone and is reduced in growing children compared with adult patients.
In a prospective study on 200 miniplates, most failures occurred in the youngest patients.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
24
DISCUSSION cont..
All failures in our study occurred in the youngest patients.
No significant differences were observed in the stability of plates fixed by self-taping or self-drilling screws. Therefore The authors recommend self-drilling screws, which are easier to use.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
25
DISCUSSION cont..
Last but not least, good orthodontic follow-up consisting of oral hygiene instructions and evaluation of miniplate anchorage is essential for treatment outcome.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
26
DISCUSSION cont.
The high success rate in this study is related to:
(1) Presurgical counseling of the patient, (2) Minimal invasive surgery with decreased patient
morbidity and adequate postsurgical instructions (3) Good orthodontic follow-up.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
27
Postsurgical Instructions to the Patients:
Cooling during 48 hours light upright position during 48 hours Increase in blood pressure avoided during the first week Rinsing twice per day with chlorhexidine over 12 days Extensive rinsing with sparkling water (5–10 times/d) NSAID over 3 days Orthodontic loading of Bollard modified miniplates at approximately 14
days after surgery. Manipulation of Bollard modified miniplates with tongue or fingers
avoided. No antibiotics are prescribed after surgery. NSAID indicates nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
28
LIMITATIONS:
Cross sectional study with no major statistical evaluation of results.
Failure was vaguely correlated with factors responsible.
Oral hygiene and compliance were either not monitored or recorded.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
29
Future Recommendations for Further Research Based on this Article:
We can explore:
1. Factors associated with failure. 2. Difference between skeletal changes with face mask
only and with Bollard miniplates. 3. Evaluation of comfort with face mask and Bollard
miniplates with class III elastics.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
30
AFID CASE:
31
INTRA ORAL PICTURES
32
DURING SURGERY
33
CONCLUSION
1. Miniplate anchorage with Bollard modified miniplates is highly effective for bone anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP).
2. Success depends on proper presurgical patient counseling, minimal invasive surgery, good postsurgical instructions, and orthodontic follow-up.
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 81, No 6, 2011
34
REFERENCES1. Delaire J. Manufacture of the ‘‘orthopedic mask.’’ RevStomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1971;72:579–582.2. Delaire J. Treatment of Class III with dentofacial orthopedicmask. Acta Odontol Venez. 1979;17:168–200.3. Baik HS. Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Koreanchildren. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:583–592.
35