François Dion, [email protected]
May 28, 2013
Summary of Recent Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Development Efforts in the
United States
Summary of ICM Efforts
Corridor Lead Agencies
Activities
I-15 Diego SANDAG • ConOps and System Requirements developed in 2008
• Simulation evaluation in 2009-2010• System launched in spring 2013• Currently in evaluation phase
US-75 Dallas
DART • ConOps and System Requirements developed in 2008
• Simulation evaluation in 2009-2010• System launched in spring 2013• Currently in evaluation phase
I-80 Bay Area
MTC / Caltrans
• ConOps developed in 2010• Project groundbreaking in October 2012• Project expected to be completed summer 2015
I-95 / I-395 Virginia
Virginia DOT • ConOps developed in 2012• Currently developing deployment plan &
partnershipsI-394 Minneapolis
MnDOT • ConOps and System Requirements developed in 2008
• Simulation evaluation in 2009• No apparent activity since 2009
I-270 Maryland
Maryland DOT
• ConOps and System Requirements developed in 2008
• No apparent activity since 2008
2
I-15 San Diego3
Corridor4
21-mile section of I-15, north of San Diego
Key transportation networks I-15 freeway Parallel arterials
Center City Parkway (in Escondido) Pomerado Road (in Poway and San Diego) Black Mountain Road/ Kearny Villa Road (in
San Diego) Transit services
MTS bus network NCTD bus network NCTD Sprinter Commuter Rail
Partnering Agencies US Department of
Transportation Research and Innovation
Technology Administration (RITA) Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) Federal Transit Administration (FTA)
State agencies Caltrans, District 7 California Highway Patrol (CHP) Freeway Service Patrol
Regional agencies San Diego Association of
Governments (SANDAG)
5
Transit agencies San Diego Metropolitan Transit
System (MTS) North County Transit District
(NCTD) Local cities
San Diego, Poway, Escondido Technical support
Kimley-Horn Delcan Transport Simulation Systems (TSS) University of California, Berkeley Cambridge Systematics Batelle Volpe Center
ICM Goals Improve accessibility to travel options and
attain an enhanced level of mobility Enhance corridor safety Provide travelers with informational tools
enabling them to make smart travel choices within the corridor
Promote coordination among institutional partners
Manage the corridor holistically under both normal operating and incident/event conditions in a collaborative and coordinated way
6
Strategies Considered System monitoring/data sharing
Real-time freeway and arterial traffic monitoring Real-time bus transit monitoring Real-time traffic signal operations monitoring Weather monitoring
Freeway operations Traffic-responsive ramp metering Lane configuration on I-15 managed lane system Access policy to I-15 managed lane system
Arterial operations Traffic-responsive signal operation Freeway ramp/arterial traffic signal coordination
7
Strategies Considered Transit operations
Rerouting of transit vehicles around incidents Increases in transit service in response to event/incidents
Traveler information Integrated, multi-modal traveler information service Provision of comparative travel times along alternate routes Provision of real-time park-and-ride space availability
information on freeways and approach routes Incident/event management
Simulation-based evaluation (microscopic modeling) of potential traffic management alternatives
8
US-75 Dallas9
Corridor 20-mile section of the US-75
freeway northeast of downtown Dallas
Freeways US-75 freeway, with managed HOV
lanes Parallel arterials
Freeway frontage roads Greenville Avenue Coit Road
Transit services DART Bus Network DART Light Rail
10
Partnering Agencies US Department of Transportation
Research and Innovation Technology Administration (RITA)
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) State agencies
Texas Department of Transportation, Dallas & Fort Worth Districts
Regional agencies North Central Texas Council of
Governments (NCTCOG) North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) Fort Worth Transportation Authority Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition
Transit agencies Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART)
11
Airports Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport
Local cities Dallas, Plano, Richardson, Highland
Park, University Park Technical support
Telvent Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) Southern Methodist University (SMU) University of Texas at Arlington Cambridge Systematics Batelle
ICM Goals Increase corridor throughput Improve travel time reliability Improve incident management Enable intermodal travel decisions
12
Strategies Considered System monitoring/data sharing
Regional information exchange network (SmartNET) Bluetooth traffic monitoring along freeway and two
diversion routes (40 locations, typically spaced 1-2 miles) Real-time monitoring of light rail location and passenger
count Weather monitoring
Freeway operations Predefined diversion plans to local arterials and/or light-rail
service in response to incidents HOV/HOT Lane Management
Arterial operations New signal timing plans for Greenville Avenue Development of event-specific signal timing plans Responsive traffic signal control
13
Traffic Detection Plan
Strategies Considered Traveler information
Multimodal traffic and transit 511 system with interactive voice response system, public web access, and mobile application
Real-time transit vehicle information (vehicle location, time to arrive at next stop)
Publication of parking availability information for 5 park-and-ride lots along the LRT red line on the 511 system and CMS signs
Links to social media (Facebook, Twitter) Exploration of sponsorship options
Incident/event management Simulation-based evaluation (mesoscopic modeling) of potential
traffic management alternatives
14
I-80 Bay Area15
Corridor 20-miles section of I-80
from Bay Bridge to Carquinez Bridge
Key corridor networks I-80 freeway Parallel arterials
San Pablo Avenue Transit services
BART subway network AC Transit bus network
16
Partnering Agencies State agencies
Caltrans California Highway Patrol (CHP)
Regional agencies Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Alameda County Transportation Commission Contra Cost Transportation Authority (CCTA) West Control Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC)
Transit agencies AC Transit WestCAT
Local Cities Albany, Berkeley, El Cerrito, Emeryville, Hercules, Oakland, Pinole,
Richmond, San Pablo
17
ICM Goals Provide traffic operation on the corridor that is equitable and
balanced for both the freeway and arterials. Integrate transportation system management activities to
enhance safety and mobility for all travel modes Enhance overall transit travel time during normal operations Enhance trip reliability by providing consistent and
predictable travel times on the freeway and local arterials Avoid impacts on local arterials while managing access at on-
ramps during peak periods on weekdays and weekends Efficiently guide traffic naturally diverted to local arterials
during major freeway incidents back to the freeway Cooperatively operate, manage and maintain all ICM elements
18
ICM Goals Cooperatively develop, implement, evaluate and revise
strategies to ensure balanced benefits to local, regional, and inter-regional travelers
Cooperatively identify and address any adverse impacts in a timely fashion
Ensure on-going communication among partnering agencies for timely review and adjustment of activities as needed
Ensure timely and appropriate communication with the public, media, and elected officials
Monitor, evaluate, and report on project performance to ensure compliance with goals and objectives
Facilitate cooperative activities that ensure the sustainability of benefits from the project
19
Strategies Considered Freeway operations
Adaptive ramp metering with preferential treatment to HOV vehicles
End of queue warning Dynamic lane use signals Variable advisory speed signs Installation of CCTV cameras
Arterial operations Traffic signal system upgrade Signal synchronization/optimization Traffic detection along San Pablo Avenue
Transit operations Transit signal priority enhancements at
signalized intersections
20
Strategies Considered Traveler information
Dynamic information display boards showing transit/traffic information
Trailblazer signs along arterials to help traffic go back to the freeway
Incident Management Freeway traffic rerouting through parallel
arterial Implementation of traffic signal flush plan to
provide additional capacity Traffic signal preemption for first responders
System integration Central system to operate all technologies
21
I-95/I-395 Virginia22
Corridor 52-mile section of I-95/I-395
between Spotsylvania Interchange and 14th Street Bridge near Washington DC
Major corridor assets I-95/I-395 freeway Transit services
Commuter rail along entire corridor Various bus services
Park-and-ride 40,771 spaces within corridor
Ridesharing services Carpools / Vanpools 6400 daily “slugs” (2008) Real-time ridesharing pilot
23
Partnering Agencies Federal agencies
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Federal Transit Administration (FTA) U.S. Department of Defense
State agencies Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Maryland State Highway Administration
Transit agencies Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) Commuter Connections Virginia Railway Express
Local cities Alexandria, Fredericksburg
24
Partnering Agencies Regional agencies
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG) Northern Virginia Regional Commission (NVRC) Northern Virginia Transportation Commission (NVTC) Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC) Arlington County Loudon County Prince William County Fairfax County Department of Transportation Dulles Area Transportation Association George Washington Regional Commission Metropolitan Area Transportation Operations Coordination (MATOC)
Universities University of Maryland Center for Transportation Technology
25
ICM Goals Promote different travel options to achieve
travel time savings and overall environmental benefits
Reduce travel time and congestion by managing travel demand in real-time
Reduce the economic cost of travel delays and congestion (from commuter, business and freight movement perspectives)
Reduce or eliminate primary or secondary Specific volume reduction of 1800 vehicles per
day on particularly congested days, targeted for travelers to the Mark Center complex in Alexandria
26
Strategies Considered System monitoring/data sharing
Integrated single information gateway Freeway operations
Ramp queue warning Traffic-responsive ramp metering (some with HOV bypass) Hard shoulder running
Arterial operations Traffic signal upgrades (adaptive control along selected arterials)
Transit operations Transit signal priority for express buses
Traveler information Real-time park-and-ride space availability information on freeways and
approach routes Comparative travel times along alternate routes (freeway, arterials,
transit) Integrated, multi-modal traveler information service
Incident management Enhanced incident detection and management
27
Deployment Strategy28
I-394 Minneapolis29
Corridor 26 mile section of the I-394/US-12 corridor west of
Minneapolis Corridor networks
I-394 freeway, with HOV and HOT lanes Parallel arterials
Highway 55 Highway 7 Three parallel freeway connectors (I-494, Hwy 169, Hwy 100)
Transit services Metro Transit Plymouth Transit SouthWest Transit (commuter services from outside corridor to downtown)
Bicycle network Network of commuter bicycle routes.
30
Partnering Agencies US Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
State agencies Minnesota Department of
Transportation Minnesota State Patrol MnPASS Phase 2 Initiative Team
Regional agencies Metropolitan Council Hennepin County
Transit agencies Metro Transit Plymouth Metrolink SouthWest Transit
31
Local jurisdictions City of Minneapolis Local Police/Fire
Departments
ICM Goals Maintain mobility and reliability
Reduce the variation in travel times experienced by travelers Maintain options for travelers to effectively travel using personal vehicles, transit or
bicycles. Maximize corridor-wide capacity utilization
Monitor available capacity of roadways, transit, parking, and alternative transportation options
Encourage pattern changes (through information sharing or incentives) to better utilize spare capacity
Event and incident management Inform travelers of incidents, their impacts, and available reroute or mode change
options Manage traffic around events through early notification and informed reactions
Holistic traveler information delivery Make travelers aware of their modal and route options. Inform travelers of options for avoiding or minimizing the impacts of travel delays
32
Strategies Considered System monitoring
Development of automated information exchange capabilities among participating agencies
Develop a corridor data clearinghouse collecting real-time information on incident, infrastructure status, transit schedule adherence, parking availability, travel times along major routes
Freeway operations Development of alternate ramp metering strategies to address
special events and incidents Dynamic freeway shoulder use during incident or special events HOV ramp metering bypass Variable speed limit to maintain steady flow and prevent incidents Opening HOT lane to all traffic during incidents Additional CMS along freeway
33
Strategies Considered Arterial operations
Adds automated, condition-responsive capability to traffic signals on arterials in the I-270 corridor
Coordinated arterial and ramp metering operations Development of special signal timing plans to address special events
and incidents Transit operations
Transit signal priority along arterials Transit connection information display for travelers and drivers Transit-only lanes on key routes within the City of Minneapolis Additional transit services during special events Temporary parking additions through nearby mall or church lots and
shuttle buses during events Transit fare adjustment during special events
34
Strategies Considered Parking operations
Parking fee adjustment during special events Traveler information
Add transit delays/schedule adherence and parking availability information to existing 511 services
Increased deployment of CMS at key arterial street locations to inform travelers of conditions on arterial streets or to warn of incidents on freeways
Increased deployment of ATIS devices in parking garages Incident management
Integration of metro transit control center with CAD reports of incidents Payment system
Attempt to combine HOT, parking, and transit payment system
35
I-270 Maryland36
Corridor 22 mile section of I-270, from the
I-495 freeway (Beltway) to the Frederick County line
Major corridor assets I-270 freeway Parallel arterials
MD-355 Network of arterial and connector routes
Transit services MARC Commuter Rail WMATA Metrorail systems WMATA Metrobus network Ride On local/commuter bus network MTA Commuter Bus network
37
Partnering Agencies US Department of Transportation (USDOT)
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA)
Maryland State Highway Administration (MDSHA) Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) Montgomery County Department of Public Works and
Transportation (DPWT) The University of Maryland (UMD) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
(WMATA)
38
ICM Goals Optimize mobility, reliability, and safety Strengthen corridor-level decision support Enhance reliable, real-time information to
customers Promote multi-modalism
39
Strategies Considered System monitoring
Enhance capability to measure travel time reliability, delays, incident severity, incident cleanup and recovery times, transit/parking utilization
Prototype and deploy an enhanced Regional Integrated Transportation Information System (RITIS)
Arterial operations Adds automated, condition-responsive capability to traffic signals
on arterials in the I-270 corridor Traveler information
Deliver computer-aided dispatch/automatic vehicle location (CAD/AVL) status information to transit users
Deliver parking availability information to commuters
40