ISMLAISMLA NEWS L E T T ERN EWS L E T T ER
Independent Schools’ Modern Languages AssociationIndependent Schools’ Modern Languages Association
No.52 Summer 2011
www.ismla.co.ukwww.ismla.co.uk
2
Chairman Nick Mair, Dulwich College Tel: 020 8693 3601 [email protected]
Vice Chairman and Membership Secretary Geoffrey Plow, University College School Tel: 020 7433 2302 [email protected]
Treasurer Peter Ansell, Stonyhurst College Tel: 01254 826345 [email protected]
Secretary Jenny Davey, Glenalmond College [email protected]. uk Liaison with prep schools
Gillian Forte. St Christopher’s School, Hove Tel: 01273 735404 [email protected] Exhibitions Organiser
David Cragg-James [email protected] Newsletter Editor
Peter Langdale, North London Colle-giate School Tel: 020 8952 0912 [email protected] Website and Reviews Editor Thomas Underwood, University College School Tel: 020 7435 2215 [email protected] Awarding Bodies Liaison Officer
Alex Frazer, Hampton School Tel: 020 8979 5526 [email protected]
Regional Co-ordinator (East)
Julia Whyte, St Francis' College Tel: 01462 670511 [email protected] Astrid McAuliffe, Alleyn’s School (Responsibility for German) Tel: 020 8557 1506 [email protected] Jane Byrne, The Manchester Grammar School Tel: 0161 2247201 [email protected] Duncan Byrne, Cheltenham College Tel: 01242 265604 [email protected]
Richard Oates, Sherborne School Tel: 01935 812249 [email protected] Aline Jacinto, The Manchester Grammar School [email protected]
Liz Hughes [email protected]
Patrick Le Berre, Highgate School Tel: 020 8340 1524 [email protected]. uk
Liaison with ALL, ISMLA repre-sentative on Executive Council
Kevin Dunne, Ampleforth College Tel: 01439 766000 [email protected]
ISMLA Representative on AQA consultative committee Patrick Thom, The Manchester Grammar School Tel: 0161 2247201 [email protected]
Contact the Committee
3
Contents
Page
From the Chairman 4
From the Editor 5
ISMLA National Conference 2011 6
ISMLA Representations on Exam Issues 12
AS/A2 Results Survey 2011 14
Cambridge IGCSE: An Alternative Route for Lan-
guages
20
Language Matters More and More 23
Launch of “Speak to the Future” 27
THE RUSSIANS HAVE COME! 28
Why I decided to study Chinese 29
Three tried and tested internet tools for language
teachers
35
Network for Languages: Building on Links into
Languages
37
Obituary- Professor Eric Hawkins 38
4
In the last edition of the Newsletter,
I wrote of the 'eerie sense of stasis'
surrounding plans for the future of
modern language teaching and
learning in this country, as last Sum-
mer ended without any clarity over
future government policy. This time I
can report that there is movement,
even if the landscape traversed is
less easily mapped than one would
like.
I draw your attention to the letter
(see pages 12-13) which ISMLA sent
to OFQUAL, AQA, Edexcel, and OCR,
as well as to Messrs Gove and Gibb,
following the ISMLA National Confer-
ence in February. We consider that
the responses we have received to
the letter are unsatisfactory and will
be discussing the issue further with
Nick Gibb, Minister for Schools, on
21st July.
Of course, the basis for the letter
was the frank and highly fruitful final
session of the conference, where
delegates helped to determine the
content of what we would ultimately
write. We are grateful for everyone's
participation and would hope to
maintain this consultative approach.
As we have stressed more than once
in the past, it pays for our represen-
tations to exam boards and the gov-
ernment to be well-informed and
measured. In that spirit, do please
read and take to heart our Awarding
Bodies' Liaison Officer Alex Frazer's
piece on the 2011 AS and A2 Results
Survey. As Alex says, the online sur-
vey will go live from the start of the
Autumn Term and will carry on into
October. Your comments on all as-
pects of GCSE, IGCSE, AS and A2
examination results, administration
and examining will be essential in
helping us form an ever more solid
evidence base.
As you will be well aware, the GCSE
v IGCSE debate has been one of the
most animated for some time. Some
schools say they seek a more
‘academic’ qualification that provides
a better preparation for sixth-form
work. Others were unhappy with the
administrative arrangements of the
new GCSE. We have invited CIE and
Edexcel to contribute articles of be-
tween 500 and 1500 words to make
clear the features of their IGCSE
offerings. You can read CIE's article
elsewhere in this Newsletter. Edex-
cel's contribution was not made
available to us in time to be pub-
lished in this Newsletter. We trust
we will be able to include it in a fu-
ture edition – but readers should be
aware that it is in no way our inten-
tion to present only one awarding
body's side of the story.
CIE maintain that the levels of diffi-
culty in GCSE and IGCSE modern
language qualifications are identical.
we have offered to pull together an
anonymous group of schools who
are willing to supply hard evidence
to support their contention that this
is not the case. If you feel strongly
about the issue and are able to sup-
ply data (say: comparison of MidYIS
value added or differences between
teaching sets taking both GCSE and
From the Chairman
5
I am delighted to say that this edi-
tion of the ISMLA Newsletter is as
varied as I can remember since I
took over the editorship two years
ago. .
As well as the customary review of
the National Conference in Febru-
ary, there is plenty about our fa-
vourite topic at this time of year
(exams, naturally). and we have
also tried to reflect the numerous
events and initiatives, against the
background of the government's
consultations on the national cur-
riculum, to bring the importance of
languages in the school and univer-
sity sectors to the attention of Mi-
chael Gove and his ministers.
On a less political note, I was de-
lighted to receive contributions
about the study of Russian and Chi-
nese and especially an article about
the practical use of new technolo-
gies from José Picardo, who spoke
at the 2010 conference. This is com-
plemented by information on the
Network for Languages, the succes-
sor to the victim of cuts, ‘Links into
Languages’.
Eagle-eyed readers will have noted
the absence of a reviews section this
time around. Publishers have not of
late been as forthcoming with mate-
rial to review as of old. However,
Tom Underwood, my predecessor as
editor (and webmaster), has kindly
agreed to take over as reviews edi-
tor and we hope to bring you a new,
improved reviews section from this
autumn.
The Newsletter relies heavily on con-
tributions from readers and their
colleagues, so please consider offer-
ing your thoughts and ideas. For
instance, it has been said that we
have not published much of late that
concerns Spanish. Would anyone like
to fill that gap? Practical classroom
ideas, reflective articles, reports -
please share them with us. All I ask
is that you contact me at plang-
[email protected] to discuss.
May I wish all our readers a restful,
enjoyable and fruitful Summer holi-
day.
Peter Langdale
From the Editor
IGCSE), I am happy to act as an
anonymous intermediary.
ISMLA has no view as to whether
IGCSE should be harder than or the
same as GCSE – we simply wish that
all involved should be clear whether
this is the case. This can only be in
the interests of pupils, SMTs, par-
ents and universities.
This edition of the Newsletter amply
reflects the variety of interests and
approaches of language teachers in
this country and my thanks go to
Peter Langdale for putting it to-
gether so well. But it is written in no
small measure by its readers. So –
enjoy the Summer holidays; and
write something for us.
Nick Mair
6
JANE BREEN & ALEX STEELE
(King Edward VI Grammar School,
Chelmsford) Faust for Fun & Can
Kids do Candide? Different ways to
use literature with beginner learn-
ers.
The conference opener was a rich
presentation, on the merits of
adapting two significant texts – not
normally met until much later in
one’s studies – as a means of teach-
ing various aspects of German and
French to those at the very begin-
ning of their linguistic adventure.
Germanist Breen had innovated her
scheme some time previously – no
doubt (young) Old Boy Steele had
come across it during his first incar-
nation at KEGS. For her, the pleas-
ure and purpose of making Faust
Part 1 a junior teaching tool were
located in building skills, confidence
and interest through a variety of
means. She advocated setting the
scene through cognate German,
suggested choral pronunciation work
on Gretchen’s poem and showed the
possibility of not only thinking skills
through a Faust soliloquy but also
“extreme” thinking skills via a
speech by Mephistopheles! There
were opportunities to puzzle out a
translation in groups, understand
compound words from their context
and analyse and adapt present
tense and modal verbs from a 2-side
plot summary in accessible German.
Ms Breen also favoured working to-
wards the dramatisation of certain
sections outside the classroom.
While the roots of his Candide pro-
ject were visible in the Faust prece-
dent, Mr Steele had decided to hook
its various elements closely to the
textbook chapters he was otherwise
teaching. With the help of the Del-
court bande dessinée adaptation, he
focused on the first ten chapters of
the text, with all the gory bits
shamelessly highlighted to appeal to
boys: violence, death, disaster, mi-
raculous escapes, dalliances with
barmaids. So Candide, once intro-
duced, became a theme for the year
to which he could return for either
first teaching or revision and rein-
forcement. Examples given included
working on Candide’s daily routine
and writing an account of school as
if one were a fellow-pupil of Can-
dide’s under Pangloss’s tutelage.
Other possibilities for Year 7 were
family, physical description, illness
and so on. To teach the present
tense, “unpleasant” verbs – such as
étrangler, pendre and vomir – were
suggested as alternatives to the
obvious old stagers. Grammar and
logic combined in an activity map-
ping out a town from a prepositional
description in the text. Various types
of group work were proposed, in-
cluding rearranging summary sen-
tences and writing phrases to de-
scribe illustrations.
ISMLA National Conference 2011
This year's conference took place on Saturday 5 February 2011 at Magdalen
College School, Oxford. We publish as ever, a digest of the day’s sessions.
7
level which leads to the selection of
the national team. To go in for it, all
our pupils need is a willingness to
think creatively, to pay attention to
detail and, crucially, to persevere as
they try to spot patterns in aspects
of languages with which they are
unlikely to be familiar. From learn-
ing – or more accurately, in some
cases – from being exposed to a
masterly exposition of, for example,
the “agreement of the past participle
with the preceding direct object
rule” in French, entrants would be
given examples of the phenomenon
in action and invited to account for
it. Not hard enough? Well, what
about trying to spot how to make
the negative form of adjectives
(“care” into “careless”, for example)
in Turkish? Still laughably simple?
Perhaps unravelling the sentence
structure of Polynesian languages
would tempt your pupils, in that
case.
Dr Hudson’s huge delight in linguis-
tics - he is a retired lecturer in the
subject at University College, Lon-
don – and his unmistakeable zest
for the Linguistics Olympiad carried
us all with him. Beyond demonstrat-
ing the interest of the work itself, he
was at pains to stress that the com-
petition is not the preserve of pupils
who see themselves as linguists –
mathematicians and physicists will
find themselves equally at home:
the Olympiad, he assured us,
“brings girls into science and boys
into languages.”
We’ll have to wait until February
2012 for the start of next year’s
Between them, Ms Breen and Mr
Steele had much to offer teachers
looking to combine ambition and
rigour with a bit of fun and some
contact with grown-up ideas. Their
materials are available on one of
their school’s associated websites,
www.kegscommunity.org.uk.
Alex Frazer
DICK HUDSON (University College
London) The UK Linguistics Olym-
piad.
In which activity could our female
and male pupils a) compete on an
equal footing with each other; b)
achieve selection for the national
team; and c) learn things that no
British school syllabus deals with?
The answer – possibly an obvious
one in view of the title of this piece –
is “the UK Linguistics Olympiad”. The
talk started auspiciously, with all the
available seats taken and more lis-
teners still pouring into the room. It
finished, in all probability, with those
who were not able to be there snap-
ping their jaws in rage at having
missed a talk that was utterly capti-
vating and added yet another to the
long list of reasons to regret the
onset of old age: we can now include
“we’re too old to try our hand at
solving fascinating linguistic puzzles
against the clock.”
The facts are simply told. There are
two rounds, the first taken in schools
at two levels, Foundation and Ad-
vanced, while the second is open to
the best candidates at Advanced
8
the day, he made the point that
ideas needed time to mature, and
that research could not be expected
to emerge 'to order' – whatever any
governmental assessment exercise
might suggest. His account of the
importance of Kant to an under-
standing of enlightenment as a Ger-
man theme (even if we usually asso-
ciate the term with France, Scotland
or even England) offered obvious
evidence of the products that can
emerge when ideas are allowed to
marinate in this way.
Goethe, Schiller and Kant are not
primarily seen as Enlightenment
writers; but Professor Reed's argu-
ment was that drawing them in to an
understanding of the discourse of
the Enlightenment enriched this area
of thought. Kant is traditionally seen
as anti-Enlightenment, in that he
seems so obscure. However, as Pro-
fessor Reed said, it was Kant's wish
to clear out obscurity in philosophi-
cal thinking to make way for a more
empirical approach. He quoted the
dtv book published in German on
Kant which advised readers to skip
more than 200 pages of one of the
philosopher's works. Professor Reed
seemed to be recommending a simi-
larly pared-down approach.
Above all, Professor Reed's talk was
practical (recommending 'Was ist
Aufklärung?' and other short essays
as a readable and approachable way
in to Kant) and lucid. Kant's central
concern was to establish what we
can know and what we cannot be
expected to know. For Kant, reason
had always to be self-critical – in-
competition. Until then, for further
information about how to enter as
well as to see some past questions,
go to www.uklo.org. There’s a fur-
ther reason, if one were needed, to
stir up interest among those we
teach – entry is completely free.
Richard Oates
DUNCAN BYRNE The latest on
trips and exchanges.
Duncan gave us an update on the
legal position and moved on to talk
about good practice, issues of pupil
recruitment and how to deal with
difficulties encountered on ex-
changes. Duncan has very kindly put
on the ISMLA website, not only the
PowerPoint from his talk but also
very helpfully a document entitled
ISMLA advice on good practice and a
model letter to parents along with
other critical documents on this diffi-
cult issue.
Peter Ansell
JIM REED (The Queen's College,
Oxford) The German Enlightenment
Jim Reed was, until his retirement,
Taylor Professor of German in the
University of Oxford. His talk at the
2011 ISMLA National Conference
gave the lie to the notion of retire-
ment. Professor Reed has been
thinking about and working on Kant
since 1984. In conversation before
9
Patrick began by talking about the
precursors of the Nouvelle Vague
who were continually constrained by
the limitations of traditional cine-
matographic techniques and he al-
lowed us to discover aspects of the
work of directors such as Jean Re-
noir and Roberto Rossellini. These
directors and their successors broke
away from the constraints of tradi-
tional cinema and films made en-
tirely in the studio with fixed camera
and strict scenarios. Instead, they
sought the liberty of using impro-
vised scenarios, amateur actors,
frequently children, particularly in
Truffaut’s films, and scenes shot in
the open air often in documentary
style and above all, spontaneity.
The first films to display this new
style of film-making were Une Partie
de Campagne (Jean Renoir), Zéro de
Conduite (Jean Vigo) and les Quatre
Cent sCoups (François Truffaut)
which was hailed as the New Wave
film and which won the prize for the
best direction at the Festival de
Cannes in 1959. Other notable films
included Pierrot le Fou and A Bout de
Souffle (Jean Luc Godard), Jules et
Jim and Les Mistons (François Truf-
faut), Cléo de 5 à 7 (Agnès Varda),
Les Parapluies de Cherbourg
(Jacques Demy), Et Dieu Créa la
Femme (Roger Vadim), Le Boucher
(Claude Chabrol), Hiroshima mon
Amour (Alain Resnais) and Contes
(Eric Rohmer). Patrick took us on a
journey into the New Wave through
a selection of these films.
The themes of the films of the New
Wave reflected the changes which
were taking place in French society
deed, the practice of reason was
that of thinking critically about all
our concerns, not of indulging in
highfalutin philosophising. In that
sense, Kant's ethics were the basis
of his political and social views.
This last point led at the end to a
fruitful discussion on the basis for
political action – the idea of the
moral politician versus that of the
political moralist. Professor Reed
gave us an excellent basis for seeing
that Kant was indeed related to
modern life. Armed with observa-
tions on the link between Hobbes
and the 'Big Society', the audience
felt that this was a talk that really
would give food for thought – some-
thing worth marinating.
Geoffrey Plow
PATRICK LE BERRE La Nouvelle
Vague, un concept dépassé?
We were treated to a wonderful ex-
posé by Patrick Le Berre, Head of
Modern Languages at Highgate
School on the New Wave in French
cinema, its techniques and its
themes. Patrick’s aim was to prove
to us that this is still an extremely
valid topic of study for our pupils at
A level and for those aspiring to en-
trance to the top universities. He
gave us a fascinating insight into the
work of the directors of the
“Nouvelle Vague” punctuating his
talk with excellent excerpts from
some of the classic films of the pe-
riod.
10
JOE DALE Exploring the Modern and
Foreign in Languages
Joe Dale is well known as a passion-
ate advocate of the use of new tech-
nologies in the language classroom
and in his presentation which
brought the conference to a close he
took the opportunity to share his
enthusiasm with us with several
examples of technology in action.
He began by emphasising the expec-
tation that technology be integrated
and used in the classroom from sev-
eral quarters, including inspectors,
There was, he said, no longer an
excuse for not doing so. He soon
warmed to his theme of the Net-
worked Teacher and the Personal
Learning Network (PLN). To the un-
initiated, and that still includes this
reviewer, the PLN seems to involve
groups of teachers actively and in-
stantaneously communicating with
each other through media such as
Twitter, FaceBook, Wikis, providing a
‘live example’ by displaying re-
sponses from his own network to an
appeal sent out shortly before the
talk.
Among the many examples of re-
sources and ideas he mentioned
were
• The CILT website as a good
place to start to create resources
(including the CILT Plus service
mentioned in the Autumn edition
of the Newsletter, p 18),
• The use of Flashmeeting (http://
flashmeeting.e2bn.net) to set up
online meetings previously ar-
at the time, changes in attitudes
towards free love, a triangular rela-
tionship and changes in the role of
women (for instance Patricia in A
Bout de Souffle and Catherine in
Jules et Jim, who has a strong per-
sonality and who dominates and
manipulates the two men). In Les
400 Coups, we see a repressive,
traditionalist and hypocritical society
and a rebellious post-war youth in-
tent on amusement, lacking any fear
of authority and denying former val-
ues (religion, school, family). Exis-
tentialism was rife and commitment
to politics of the left. The “Hippy“
movement reinforced the demand
for greater freedom (divorce, abor-
tion and the Pill) The New Wave
films documented this revolution and
were immensely popular.
Patrick concluded by showing us how
films in the New Wave style are still
present today in techniques em-
ployed by American and British film
directors eg. Stephen Frears. They
may not purport to being part of the
New Wave, but are influenced by its
techniques and themes, writing their
own scripts and tackling controver-
sial themes, which have changed
necessarily in line with the evolution
in attitudes and changes in society.
There is scope to learn about the
New Wave in the new A level specifi-
cations and having shared Patrick’s
extensive knowledge of and incredi-
ble enthusiasm for this film genre,
we left the conference keen to en-
gage in learning about and teaching
this topic to our pupils,
Liz Hughes
11
• The use of podcasts to give a
sense of reward by ‘publishing’
For more on all of these and a great
deal else besides, we were encour-
aged to visit Joe’s blog (http://
joedale.typepad.com).
Peter Langdale
ranged through a Wiki.
• Streamed show-and-tell sessions
• The use of RSS feeds to keep in
touch with developments
• Even for those not into Twitter,
one can sign up for the MFL
Times for a digest of stories re-
garding languages (http://
twitter.com/#!/MFLTimes)
New Patrons of ISMLA
We are very pleased to be able to draw on the expertise and experience of a
number of ISMLA Patrons. These are head teachers and senior professionals
in the field of modern language teaching who have agreed to offer us such
advice and support as may become necessary from time to time.
There are two new Patrons.
Simon Corns is Headmaster at Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School, Black-
burn. His name will be familiar from reviews he has written for the Newslet-
ter. We are delighted that Simon is able to lend his experience and assis-
tance.
Helen Myers is Assistant Head at the Ashcombe School in Dorking and
Chair of the ALL-London branch committee. Helen has done sterling work in
identifying and then publicising incidences of severe grading in MFL public
examinations. ISMLA has worked closely with Helen for some time, especially
over our online results surveys. We are very pleased to welcome Helen as a
Patron.
The other current patrons of ISMLA are Adam Pettit, Headmaster of Highgate
School Peter Hamilton, Headmaster of Haberdashers’ Aske's Boys’ School, Dr
Daphne West and Dr Helen Wright, Headmistress of St Mary’s, Calne
Geoffrey Plow
12
ISMLA has been engaged for nearly two years in a series of surveys and con-
sultations with its 170 member schools to monitor reactions to the reform of
GCSE, AS and A-level examinations initiated in the last five years. A signifi-
cant aim has been to make judgments ‘in the round’ and not to respond in an
impulsive way to a single set of results in any examination session or con-
cerns peculiar to individual schools.
Our evidence base has been as follows:
• September-November 2010: online survey in conjunction with ALL-
London of AS/A2 results with responses from some 90 schools
• September-November 2009: online survey in conjunction with ALL-
London of AS results with a similar scale of response
• October 2010: invited consultation of members in advance of ISMLA's
participation in the Languages Teaching Pedagogy Seminar with Schools
Minister Nick Gibb
• February 2011: invited written responses from our annual conference
delegates on a range of current Modern Languages issues
The following are the central issues that have emerged:
1. We are concerned about the disparity between the propor-
tions of candidates achieving A* at A-level between Modern
Languages and other subjects with a similarly high academic
entry profile, such as Mathematics, Further Mathematics, Phys-
ics and Chemistry (1).
ISMLA Representations on Exam Issues
At the National Conference in February the committee indicated that it would
be sending a letter to the examination boards and ministers regarding mem-
bers’ concerns about recent examination changes and grading issues. We
reproduce below the text of the letter that was sent in April 2011 to Edexcel,
OCR and AQA, as well as to Michael Gove and Nick Gibb.
13
2. We are equally troubled by the fact that the marking of oral
examinations has been widely viewed as unreliable by member
schools in the last two years. In particular, member schools
have repeatedly highlighted the phenomenon of linguists
known to be gifted being outperformed by weaker ones. We
agree with guidance offered by all boards that candidates
should not be rehearsed and that discussion should be allowed
to develop organically during each oral examination. However,
we believe that candidates who have learned successfully,
practised speaking assiduously over the long term and ex-
pressed themselves eloquently and meaningfully under pres-
sure have effectively been penalised by a set of criteria prone
to identify them as ‘over prepared’.
Consequent upon the above two factors, there has been a marked rise in
Senior Management interventions in ISMLA member schools such that inter-
ested pupils, who would find Modern Languages an advantageous and fulfill-
ing component in their own future, are being encouraged towards other Sixth
Form subjects offering a more predictable and reliable grade outcome. This
flies in the face of the oft-stated strategic commercial, social and academic
need for highly trained linguists in the United Kingdom.
The time is right for a structured response to the serious situation outlined
above. Bernadette Holmes (President Elect of the Association for Language
Learning), Helen Myers (Chair of ALL-London) and I would welcome the op-
portunity to meet with the examination boards at a mutually convenient time
this summer. It can only be in the interests of awarding bodies and students
alike to achieve genuine consistency of grade outcomes between subjects.
Yours Sincerely,
Nick Mair
Chairman, ISMLA (Vice-Chair, ALL-London)
(1) Work undertaken by ALL-London on severe grading seems to confirm the relative difficulty of
attaining A-level A* in Modern Languages. The combined A*/A rate tends to be impressive for sub-
jects having what ALL-London describes as an “intake profile with more higher-attaining students”.
On the first year’s data, this is indeed the case for French (39%), German (41%) and Spanish
(38%). Subjects considered to fall into the same bracket include Maths (45%) and Physics (33%).
The average A*/A rate for all subjects was 27%. One might expect, then, to see high proportions of
these able students getting the very top grade. However, although the average A* rate as a fraction
of the A*/A figure was 30%, scores for Modern Languages fell away: 20% for French, 24% for
German and 22% for Spanish. By comparison, Maths and Physics beat the average with 38% and
31% respectively. A further comparison might be made with History, for instance, where the com-
bined A*/A figure of 28% was substantially below that for Modern Languages, while the A* propor-
tion was better at 25% of A*/A.Further information at: http://www.all-
london.org.uk/2010_a_level_a_s tar_issue.htm
14
(I)GCSE, AS/A2 Results Survey 2011
An appeal from the Awarding Bodies Liaison
Officer
We shall again be running our online surveys of AS and A2 examination re-
sults. This year, as mentioned by the Chairman in his introduction to this
Newsletter, we will also be asking for your reactions to results for GCSE and
IGCSE. They will go live on the ISMLA website at the start of the Autumn
term and remain open until early October. This will allow time for reflection
in your departments before (as we hope you will) you add your findings.
Please remember that your submissions are anonymous if you want them to
be – you are very welcome to name your centre if you prefer – and the raw
data are seen only by a handful of ISMLA committee members.
We were delighted with the response from member schools at the start of
this academic year. As you may remember from the Spring newsletter, we
received around 90 submissions, representing 1704 AS entries and 1296 A2
entries. With such a robust sample – enhanced by your contributions to the
Yellow Paper at February’s conference – we were able to write with confi-
dence to all the examination boards as well as Michael Gove and the Schools
Minister, Nick Gibb. This letter is reproduced on the following page. A num-
ber of meetings are in the offing, which we hope will bear fruit as far as
member schools’ concerns go.
It goes without saying that gathering the same amount of data – if not more
– in 2011 will be invaluable if we are to continue to represent our member-
ship faithfully and, of course, to establish trends in each successive year of
these still-young specifications. So please do take the short time necessary
to fill in the AS and A2 halves of the survey, once you and your department
have digested your August results. And the best of luck to your pupils!
Alex Frazer
15
language syllabuses.
Features of Cambridge IGCSE
language syllabuses Cambridge
IGCSE language syllabuses develop
learners’ confidence and skills in
listening, reading, speaking and
writing. They are designed to be
taught holistically with exams at the
end of two years. This linear struc-
ture provides learners and teachers
with the opportunity to build confi-
dence and ideas. There is also no
controlled assessment which eases
the assessment burden and provides
more time for teaching and learning.
Jayne Jennings, Head of Modern
Languages at Abingdon School, said
her MFL department decided unani-
mously to opt for Cambridge IGCSE
French, German and Spanish after
looking at the specifications. She
said: “We chose Cambridge IGCSE
not only because we were dissatis-
fied with the new GCSE format but
also because IGCSE offered positive
benefits for our students – including
an interesting creative writing task,
one oral exam which allows pupils to
talk about topics of personal inter-
est, and the flexibility to cater for
less able pupils as well as stretching
the most able.”
All Cambridge IGCSE language sylla-
buses include a compulsory oral ex-
amination at the end of the course
which is internally assessed and ex-
ternally moderated by Cambridge.
The list of qualifications available to
schools is ever-growing. It’s not just
a case of choosing between exam
boards, but also deciding which
qualification offers the best route for
your students.
Much has been written about the
International GCSE in the UK, and
misconceptions surround its level of
difficulty and content. However it’s a
fact that many schools are looking
for an alternative to GCSE, and the
popularity of the IGCSE is growing.
UK entries for Cambridge IGCSE,
provided by University of Cambridge
International Examinations, are up
95% on June 2010. Over 500 UK
schools now offer Cambridge IGCSE,
including 200 state schools and 300
from the independent sector.
So why are schools switching to
Cambridge IGCSE? Here are some
key facts about the qualification for
language teachers.
Wide subject choice Cambridge
IGCSE is available in 30 language
syllabuses. English as a Second Lan-
guage, French, German, Greek,
Hindi and Spanish are Ofqual-
accredited and funded for teaching
in UK state schools. We have also
submitted Mandarin Chinese to
Ofqual for accreditation and hope to
receive this soon. University of Cam-
bridge International Examinations is
the only UK exam board to have
Ofqual-accredited and funded IGCSE
Cambridge IGCSE
An Alternative Route for Languages
16
dards booklets which show the stan-
dard required to obtain a particular
grade. The new materials will be
published on our Teacher Support
website in late 2011, and will also be
available on request.
Nationally and globally recog-
nised Cambridge IGCSE is the
world’s most popular international
qualification for 14-16 year olds, and
is taken in over 135 countries. It is
widely recognised by universities
around the world.
Cambridge IGCSEs in French, Ger-
man, Greek, Hindi and Spanish
count towards the English Baccalau-
reate and are included in the Gov-
ernment’s school performance ta-
bles.
Comprehensive support for
schools We do everything we can
to help UK schools make an easy
transition from GCSE to Cambridge
IGCSE. We guide schools through
the registration process, and help
teachers deliver the syllabuses –
providing support with curriculum
mapping, exam materials, and IN-
SET.
The next INSET courses for Cam-
bridge IGCSE language syllabuses
will take place in September and
October 2011. They are aimed at
teachers who have recently started
teaching Cambridge IGCSE, or are
considering teaching it. Training will
be given on marking to help teach-
ers understand the standards re-
quired of students. To register,
please go to: www.cie.org.uk/
igcseinset
And the final written exam offers
good preparation for post-16 lan-
guage study.
Grading standards Cambridge
IGCSE is recognised as equivalent
grade-for-grade with UK GCSE. We
carry out comparability studies with
OCR GCSE to check that the stan-
dard is equivalent, and we use many
of the same examiners as OCR. Indi-
cators used in awarding include fore-
cast grades and previous perform-
ance, including at GCSE.
Owing to the global take up of Cam-
bridge IGCSE languages, including
among native and second language
speakers, we take particular care in
awarding to ensure that the highest
grades are available to genuine for-
eign language learners.
We are sometimes asked if the inter-
national student cohort disadvan-
tages language learners in the UK.
However, Cambridge IGCSE assess-
ments are criterion-referenced, not
norm-referenced. Learners are
measured against a standard, not
against each other.
Teachers who are new to teaching
Cambridge IGCSE want to know
more about the standard required,
and we are happy to provide this
information. We publish component
level grade boundaries (up to grade
A) on our free Teacher Support web-
site. We provide syllabus level
boundaries on request – including
grade A*, which is only awarded at
syllabus level.
We are also currently updating Ex-
ample Candidate Responses stan-
17
We can put teachers in touch with
Cambridge IGCSE language teachers
in UK schools to hear about their
experiences. We also encourage
applications from language teachers
interested in becoming Cambridge
examiners. Please email us at inter-
[email protected] or call on 01223
553 554.
Peter Monteath, UK Schools Man-
ager, University of Cambridge Inter-
national Examinations
Over 9000 schools worldwide are
registered with Cambridge, creating
a huge network of expertise. We
host discussion forums on our
Teacher Support website so that
teachers can connect with their
peers, Cambridge subject specialists,
and examiners. Teachers can also
share resources such as lesson
plans, schemes of work, teaching
notes, activities and tests.
Find out more To learn more
about Cambridge IGCSE, go to
www.cie.org.uk/igcseuk
UK GCSE Cambridge IGCSE Context of
the curricu-
lum
Based on the UK Natio-
nal Curriculum to Key
Stage 3.
Based on best-in-class syllabuses throu-
ghout the world (including the UK), dra-
wing best practice from several areas.
Subject
criteria
(knowledge
and skills)
Owned by QCDA/Ofqual.
Written by UK-based
subject experts determi-
ning the appropriate
subject content for lear-
ners at age 16 with a
UK background.
Owned by University of Cambridge Inter-
national Examinations. Accredited by the
regulator. Written by subject experts with
international experience.
Amount of
content
Defined by Ofqual
through the subject
criteria.
Defined by University of Cambridge In-
ternational Examinations – greater free-
dom to include content that is different,
motivating, interesting. Uses a greater
variety of source material.
Assessment
Objectives
Defined by the regulator
through the subject
criteria.
Defined by University of Cambridge In-
ternational Examinations – greater free-
dom to use appropriate weightings of
skills to fit individual subjects.
Cambridge IGCSE and UK GCSE comparison table
The table below shows the main differences between Cambridge IGCSE and
UK GCSE across all subject areas :
18
UK GCSE Cambridge IGCSE
Scheme of
assessment
Most GCSEs are unitised.
This means students can
take some modules before
the end of the two-year
course if they choose, and
get a good idea of the
standard they are rea-
ching.
Cambridge IGCSE is linear. This me-
ans that all the exams are at the end
of the two year course. Students can
gain an idea of the standard they are
reaching during the course by using
Standards Booklets.
Approach to
learning
Encourages a unitised
approach – learning a
module, taking an exam,
moving on to the next
module.
Encourages an holistic approach –
subject content is developed over
time so students can develop and
internalise ideas thoroughly.
Re-sits It is possible to re-sit mo-
dules.
Re-sits of individual modules are not
possible during the course, saving
time spent on preparation and exa-
minations.
Accessibility Designed to be accessible
to all students and inclusi-
ve of all students within
the framework of the su-
bject criteria.
Designed to be accessible to all stu-
dents and inclusive of all students
within the framework of the subject
criteria. No assumption that English
is the first language. Takes account
of the needs of students with diverse
national and linguistic backgrounds.
Controlled
assessment
GCSE has controlled as-
sessment for either 25%,
40% or 0% of the course.
No controlled assessment.
Standards GCSE defines the national
standard in a subject at
KS4.
Same standard as GCSE.
Skills Maths, English and ICT
cover the Functional Skills
criteria.
Learner-centred skills-based educa-
tion is integrated into all the syllabu-
ses to give students the tools to com-
pete internationally.
Recognised
by UK univer-
sities
Yes. Yes.
19
20
21
ence, the humanities, business
studies and (one he stressed)
area studies.
• He also mentioned the problem
that strategically important lan-
guage studies were not one stu-
dents were necessarily prepared
to pay for.
He was followed by Baroness
Coussins, Chair of the All Party Par-
liamentary Group for Modern Lan-
guages. She noted, inter alia, the
following:
• 70% of employers were not
happy with language skills of
employees and so recruit over-
seas rather than among British
graduates
• Recently only 7 out of 308 EU
linguists’ jobs went to British
nationals and EU meetings have
had to be cancelled because of
the lack of English native-speaker
interpreters
• The funding of MFL degrees re-
mains under threat.
• Inconsistency of views on the
value of languages
• One third of state schools have
reduced MFL provision
• In the UK less school time is
spent on MFL teaching than in
almost any other developed
country.
On Wednesday 9th February 2011 I
attended this meeting at the invita-
tion of the British Academy. It was
attended by well over 100 people,
principally drawn from the Higher
Education sector. As far as I could
tell, I was the only representative of
the secondary sector. The purpose
was to launch the new position
statement which followed on from
the 2009 “Languages Matters” state-
ment also from the British Academy.
Briefly, the background is the con-
cern in the British Academy and the
higher education community gener-
ally at the state of the foreign lan-
guage learning in the UK at a time
when funding for higher education
teaching is under severe pressure.
Shortly after the meeting I decided it
would not go amiss to make a short
résumé of proceedings in so far as
they had a bearing on the independ-
ent sector. The full text of all that
was said at the meeting can be
found on the British Academy web-
site (www.britac.ac.uk/policy/
Language-mat ter s -more-and-
more.cfm) along with the position
paper itself.’ its predecessor position
statement and much much more.
Professor Nigel Vincent of the
British Academy opened the sub-
stantive proceedings. Two points
struck me as of interest:
• He stressed the need to see lan-
guage studies as interdiscipli-
nary, stretching across a full
range from science, social sci-
LANGUAGE MATTERS MORE AND MORE
22
Professor Michael Worton, Vice-
Provost of UCL and author of a 2009
HEFCE review of MFL provision in
higher education. Like previous
speakers he set the decline in stu-
dent demand for language teaching
in higher education against closures,
funding pressures and the rise in
fees next year. Despite protection of
the research budget, he said that
10% cut to MFL research was likely.
Interestingly he pointed to the rise
of the overseas student population
who have brought with them the
assumption of interlocutory compe-
tence in several languages and in-
deed that evidence showed that they
were far more likely to use univer-
sity language teaching facilities than
UK students; however their numbers
are likely to drop because of new
visa restrictions. Bearing in mind the
importance at all levels of language
teaching he called on universities to
• Introduce truly interdisciplinary
courses involving languages
(rather than XXX and/with
French)
• Go out and sell languages and
related courses assuming a low
level of interest
He went on to describe UCL initia-
tives, with their Academy in Camden
and on entry requirements (initially
viewed with suspicion by other de-
partments but now seen by them as
a USP).
David Willetts appeared briefly to
have his photo taken with the posi-
tion paper, but also to call first of all
for the importance of language study
She then proceeded to renew her
call for a Language Recovery Pro-
gramme, the highlights of which
were:
• Revision of the National Curricu-
lum especially at KS4, including
the possibility of including the
encouragement/recogni t ion
‘other qualifications’ such as the
languages ladder (ASSET).
• Not to waste the investment
made in primary languages
• Universities to get involved in the
debate re language provision in
schools
• Follow the UCL lead to make a
language qualification an entry
requirement
• Universities to take an interest in
GCSE and A level
• Get assessment right at school
level
Dr David Docherty of the Council
for Industry and Higher Education in
his intervention made a strong plea
for the message of the importance of
languages for business and industry
to ‘penetrate schools’ advisory ser-
vices. He went on to say that busi-
ness needs people who are culturally
attuned and sensitive and see lan-
guage as the key to the soul of a
people as well as just a negotiating
tool. He stated that the possession
of English as our first language in
this country has bred a false opti-
mism: “English is our blessing and
our curse”.
23
study abroad and mentioned that
UCAS could help them to look out-
side our borders. Two other points to
emerge: a) the government has
maintained for one year the fee
waiver for a year abroad and ‘hopes’
to extend it and b) the importance of
spreading to schools the message
about the availability of programmes
such as Erasmus.
Peter Langdale
in its own right and to avoid a slide
into utilitarianism. Was this perhaps
a slightly false note following on the
previous speakers who without slip-
ping into a purely utilitarian argu-
ment were seeing very strong links
between the importance of language
study with both private and public
sector employment? He briefly al-
luded to Michael Gove’s E Bac as a
move in the right direction. In his
address he also suggested that UK
students should be looking more to
*NEW TEACHERS TRAINING DAY*
Are members of your department in their first three years of
teaching? Will you have a PGCSE student in your depart-
ment this Autumn?
If so, send them to ISMLA’s inaugural Modern Languages
training day on Friday 18th November at The Manchester
Grammar School. Sessions will include:
• Ideas for high impact lessons
• How to keep developing your language skills
• Overview of topical issues in language learning
• Managing your time, your emails and difficult parents
• Peer advice discussions on day-today issues
• Advice on working towards your first promotion
Further details will be found on the ISMLA website .
24
inward investment; our trading and
financial sectors own enormous
overseas holdings; our great cities
are cultural and linguistic melting-
pots. But in spite of all this, we
have failed time and again to invest
seriously in linguists.
When I took my first degree finals in
1971 I had been diligently prepared
for a world of international co-
operation and the dismantling of
protectionism. I owed this to my far
-sighted father, himself a linguist.
In my teens in the 60’s I was sent
regularly to stay with a French fam-
ily near Calais in an area which was
slowly recovering from being in the
front line of both world wars. I had
an exchange arrangement with a
young German whose father was the
captain of one of the last U-boats to
be sunk in 1945. And in what would
now be my gap year, I spent several
months in Perugia at the Università
per Stranieri. At Oxford I was able
to read Modern European History
and French, a new combination, and
spent a year in a French lycée as an
‘assistant de langue anglaise.’ By
the age of 23, when I started work
and when the UK joined the Com-
mon Market, as it was then, I was a
I am truly grateful for the invitation
to talk to you today. I had to ex-
plain to my excited family that, no, I
hadn’t been invited to compere the
BAFTA Awards ceremony – that’s a
completely different British Acad-
emy.
I am delighted to be given this dis-
tinguished platform on which to talk
briefly about a subject on which I
have very strong views. This is an
honour and a privilege for me.
Thank you.
This fine institution has been pro-
moting humanities and the social
sciences for over a hundred years.
I have been working in the City for
nearly 40 of those years. In that
time I have witnessed, aghast, the
playing out of a dreadful contradic-
tion in government policy: the
state’s support for the teaching of
modern foreign languages has been
in one depressing direction – down-
wards. At the same time successive
governments’ enthusiasm for global-
isation - removing barriers to free
trade, free flows of capital (and,
broadly, people) - has been un-
bounded. By world standards, in-
vesting in the UK is relatively easy;
we have a very high share of direct
Launch of “Speak to the Future”
Exactly a week after the launch of “Language Matters More and More” the
very same British Academy was host to the launch of the “Speak to the Fu-
ture” , a five-year campaign aimed at addressing “UK’s flagging achievement
in language learning”. At the launch, Richard Hardie, Chair of UBS Ltd, gave
a speech which we, with permission, reproduce below. More details on the
campaign can be found at www.speaktothefuture.org.
25
by the way). I’m sorry to say that
this situation has hardly improved in
15 years.
I’ll come back to the business story
in a minute. As a non-executive I’m
lucky to have the time to chair the
Learning Trust, Hackney’s education
authority. It is the only independ-
ent, not-for-profit LEA in the coun-
try. A very high proportion of Hack-
ney students already speak a lan-
guage other than English in their
family. Not only does this give them
an advantage when they come to
learn a third language; it also makes
Hackney, and places like it, immedi-
ate beneficiaries of Speak to the
Future’s proposed elevation of the
academic status of world languages,
leading to a wider recognition of the
value of these born linguists and
their languages in our society.
On the developmental front, we be-
lieve that learning a language and
exploring another culture’s language
and literature are wonderfully invit-
ing and enriching for learners. Com-
petence in a language is a great
thing in its own right. Indeed, I feel
sorry for non-linguists. As linguists
we know worlds that non-linguists
will never know.
With limited resources we are devel-
oping a strategy for modern foreign
languages. As a principle we believe
that languages should be taught
slowly, carefully and sensitively from
a young age. We have very, very
little failure in languages at primary
level. At secondary level, failure
usually happens in the first lesson
and is very hard to retrieve. At pri-
young European with an insight and
interest in other cultures and history
which has never left me, and a per-
spective on our own culture which
has been constantly illuminating.
1978 saw the dismantling of war-
time exchange controls, which sim-
plified inward and outward invest-
ment; 1986 brought the deregula-
tion of capital markets in London –
‘Big Bang’. This confirmed London
in its top 3 position as a global fi-
nancial centre alongside New York
and Tokyo. My own firm, then War-
burgs, led the creation of the mod-
ern European Equities markets to
challenge continental companies’
traditional dependence on bond issu-
ance. We bought businesses in
Paris, Milan and Munich and opened
offices in Madrid, Amsterdam and
Stockholm. With some luck, but
also because I was a linguist, I was
in the middle of all these events. I
used my languages regularly.
When Warburgs was found to be too
small to compete globally I was
lucky that there was a European
solution: we were bought by Swiss
Bank Corporation. It was then that I
realised the astonishing skill range
of my new colleagues. Down to a
quite junior level, they could discuss
very difficult banking and mathe-
matical concepts in impeccable Eng-
lish. By contrast, the language skills
of my compatriots were found
dreadfully wanting. The same was
true two years later when Union
Bank of Switzerland merged with
Swiss Bank to form the modern UBS
(the initials don’t stand for anything
26
have 88 nationalities represented on
our staff in London speaking 75 dif-
ferent primary languages between
them. Over 40% of the staff speak
a second language on a scale from
moderate to fluent. And note that
our client base is increasingly global-
ised, multicultural and plurilingual.
For us, someone with a good knowl-
edge of a language builds trust and
deepens relationships with clients
who speak that language. This is
true not just for our contact with the
clients in the front line but also their
PAs, receptionists, technicians, local
lawyers, and so on, i.e. all the peo-
ple we come into contact with.
A linguist who can communicate
comfortably with colleagues from
overseas in London is promoting our
diversity and their inclusion. When
they travel to offices in other coun-
tries, staff who know the local lan-
guage can interpret our culture and
values to our overseas colleagues
and vice versa. Also, and this is
something that is easy to overlook,
they can interpret accurately to their
colleagues what our clients really
mean and feel. This is incredibly
valuable when, as often happens,
the client has a weaker grasp of
English than they will admit, or
where local strains of English have
grown up which may be easily un-
derstood by local speakers but are
not easy for someone from the UK to
follow. Many millions of dollars can
be lost over misunderstandings or
messages that are literally lost in
translation.
But it’s not just the interpreter skills
mary level, we can show how chil-
dren can move quickly from words
to phrases and simple sentences.
Some secondaries are beginning to
help with CPD and teaching tech-
niques in their feeder primaries. We
are also steadily aligning the desig-
nation of Spanish as a first language
between primaries and secondaries.
We have some inspiring leaders: two
neighbouring schools are sharing the
teaching of languages at A level in
order to optimise use of the best
teaching and, frankly, to be able to
afford to teach a very small number
of students. But it’s all patchy and
hesitant and insecure. We need
decisive central action on a consis-
tent curriculum ladder of progression
through all phases and the full sup-
port of the adult world as a whole,
especially business.
So let me tell you why UBS values
language skills in students emerging
from the other end of our education
system: our graduate recruitment
website describes what we look for
in a candidate. We discuss the rele-
vance of academic backgrounds.
“UBS recruits graduates from all
academic backgrounds – the hu-
manities and sciences, as well as
economics and finance. Because of
its global reach, the firm is particu-
larly keen to hear from students with
strong language skills.” There you
have it – right in the second sen-
tence; it’s as explicit as we can
make it.
UBS is a truly global business. We
have offices in over 50 countries and
employ about 64,000 people. We
27
expatriates as there are no suitable
local candidates.
Thank you for hearing me out. It’s
been a privilege to come to the na-
tion’s headquarters of Humanities
and to make the case for its young
people to be given a chance to equip
themselves as global citizens and
global wealth-creators.
www.speaktothefuture.org.
which we value. A linguist will have
worked out how a language works
and will have acquired excellent oral
and written communication skills.
They stand out in the crowd. But
they’re becoming increasingly rare
and their places are being taken by
people from other education systems
where a strong competency in an-
other language, usually English, is
taken for granted.
Apart from anything else, it’s difficult
to acquire a language so they will
have proved, as too many young
people who come to see us cannot
prove, that they’ve been able to do
something difficult.
I mentioned diversity. Our own ex-
perience supports the statement that
language skills in the UK seem to be
becoming increasingly the preserve
of the independent education sector.
This can’t be right, for so many rea-
sons; for UBS it does not reflect the
cultural and economic backgrounds
of an increasing number of our cli-
ents. I would dearly love to see
more young people learning lan-
guages in State schools.
My main message from business is
that, in addition to the developmen-
tal value of studying a language per
se, knowledge of a language will
greatly increase a young person’s
chances of employment, whether by
UK-based companies addressing
foreign markets and clients, or by
large groups headquartered over-
seas who need Brits who can repre-
sent them locally and represent the
UK office to the overseas headquar-
ters. Too often they have to bring in
For the record, the stated aims of
the campaign are
1. Every language valued as an
asset
2. A coherent experience of lan-
guages for all children in pri-
mary school
3. A basic working knowledge of at
least two languages including
English for every child leaving
secondary school
4. Every graduate qualified in a
second language
5. An increase in the number of
highly qualified linguists
28
Firstly, because it does not take long
to set up a company here and there
are well-developed financial ser-
vices. Also, British education is
highly rated in Russia – it is prestig-
ious to study in British schools and
universities. As for the British peo-
ple, they have a reputation of being
tolerant and friendly.
Are there any attractions for the
British in Russia? Plenty! Russia is
no longer an emerging market. The
EU accounted for 49.5 % of Russia’s
trade turnover in 2010 after the to-
tal volume of business increased
more than fourfold that year. Twelve
miles west of Moscow they are con-
s t r u c t i n g “ I nno g r ad ” , i . e .
“Innovation City”, which will concen-
trate a mass of Russian and multina-
tional high-technology companies.
It is common knowledge that Russia
is culturally rich and its achieve-
ments in the fields of literature, art,
dance and music are celebrated
throughout the world.
Russian territory stretches from the
Baltic to the Pacific and presents
exciting travel opportunities.
Of course, all that Russia has to of-
fer is much more accessible if one
learns its beautiful language.
Tanya Kinsey North London Colle-
giate School
The notorious Cold War warning “the
Russians are coming” should be for-
gotten. Several thousands of them
have come and can be seen and
heard everywhere – in shops, mar-
kets, banks, restaurants, hospitals,
schools, universities, theatres, mu-
seums, etc. And that is not just in
“Londongrad” (London’s nickname)
but all over “misty Albion” as Britain
is traditionally known in Russia. It is
no longer possible to have a conver-
sation in Russian and be sure that
nobody will understand it. Once I
was greatly amused on the train
when a Russian man passionately
tried to convince his prospective
business partner on the other end of
the phone line to invest into produc-
ing and selling dried egg yolks!
Who are these Russians and what
attracts so many of them to Britain?
If one believes the common stereo-
type, they are the Russian oligarchs,
spies and Mafia… Yet 99.9 % of Rus-
sians in the UK are hardworking pro-
fessionals and students. LSE alone in
2009-10 enrolled 111 students. My
former North London Collegiate stu-
dents find plenty of opportunity to
practise their Russian in their univer-
sities!
The new generation of Russians are
multilingual and could work in any
country and easily adapt to any cul-
ture. Why do they choose Britain?
THE RUSSIANS HAVE COME!
Perceptions of Russia, Russians and the Russian language have undergone a
seismic shift in recent years. Tanya Kinsey reflects on the new reasons why
schools and students should take Russian seriously.
29
Why I decided to study Chinese
‘Those [students] who had studied Chinese had the highest starting salary at £24,540 a year…’
Graduate Employment at Highest Level for 17 Years, The Guardian, 1/11/10
Let me be frank; if I were a hard-hearted man and it were all dollars and cents, I’d probably have started a degree in Chinese. However, would the promise of potential higher earnings have sustained me through a four-year course if I were doing something I wasn’t genuinely interested in? The evi-dence suggests not. The average year at Oxford for Chinese loses roughly 15% of its students before graduation, a drop-out rate 937% higher than the university-wide average of 1.6%.
How, then, did I get to the point where I believed that I was passionate enough about Chinese to take on the challenges which the course offers? Anyone will tell you that China is all around us. It is on our shelves, it is on our TV screens, it is in our newspapers, it is inescapable. As a 16 year-old who had only ever been exposed at school to the history and languages of Europe, I noticed the growing coverage of this massive country that I knew so little about. I started asking questions such as ‘why is this happening?’ and ‘why is this happening now?’ The answers to these questions threw up other questions and I kept reading and asking questions until, one day, I came to the conclusion that I was probably more interested in China-related topics than anything else at school; reading Chinese at university had be-come the natural choice of degree long before I’d set foot in China or written my first Chinese character.
The key realisation was that a ‘Chinese’ course isn’t actually all about the Chinese language. If you want a Mandarin language course, buy a Michel Thomas book or mp3; it costs £9.95 and won’t take you four years. If you want a China-orientated blend of modern languages, classics, linguistics, literature, philosophy, history, sociology, politics and economics, apply to do Chinese at university. The reality of the situation is that you don’t need to be a swivel-eyed Sinophile to read Chinese; the course simply requires students to have excellent analytical skills, an enquiring mind, an aptitude for lan-guages and a rock solid work-ethic. Gushing about how much you love Wild Swans, nibbling chicken feet or ‘treating’ your friends to renditions of Beijing Opera, however, is strictly optional.
Michael Oates St Anne’s College, Oxford
University in China?
Those starting to plan UCAS entry could consider one of the ten scholarships
available at the TsingHua University in Beijing (rated 2nd in China). In these
days of rising tuition fees, the opportunity to study a BA in Business Chinese
at a fraction of the cost may well be of interest. Lectures are in Chinese so a
gap year is advisable. For details contact [email protected].
30
Voki <http://voki.com> provides us
with an excellent tool to assess
speaking that pupils find both fun
and engaging, whilst also making it
possible and easy to set speaking
tasks for homework. One of the
most striking and unexpected ad-
vantages of using Voki in the lan-
guages classroom is that it has
made it possible for the quieter pu-
pils to make their presence felt and
be heard.
In my experience, it has often been
the case that it is indeed these pu-
pils who have produced the most
remarkable Vokis, often outshining
their more lively and vociferous
counterparts. Using Voki has helped
to increase all my pupils’ self-
assurance when it comes to speak-
ing in a foreign language by allowing
them to role-play and become some-
one else: a more confident self.
Storybird
Storybird <http://storybird.com>is a
writing tool that allows its users to
create and publish short illustrated
stories. Teachers can set up ac-
counts for their pupils and organise
them into classes, so that the work
pupils produce can then be shared
Lack of academic rigour is one of the
main criticism often levelled at the
use of web applications in the class-
room. However, it doesn’t have to
be this way. Just like any other tool,
when used appropriately, many of
the web applications that are freely
available on the internet can be used
as powerful and effective teaching
and leaning tools.
By looking at three specific web ap-
plications - Voki, Storybird and Glog-
ster - that we have successfully used
in our MFL Department at Notting-
ham High School, I aim to demon-
strate that it is indeed possible, even
desirable, to use these tools as part
of a varied schemes of work to sup-
port and enhance the teaching and
learning of modern languages.
Voki
The ability to speak the foreign lan-
guage in question can safely be de-
scribed as the principal objective of
learning foreign languages. How-
ever, it can often prove difficult to
assess your pupils’ ability to speak
the foreign language in the class-
room, as time and numbers often
conspire against us.
Three tried and tested internet tools
for language teachers
José Picardo, Head of Modern Foreign Languages at Nottingham High
School and curator of the award-winning technology and education blog
www.boxoftricks.net puts some flesh on some interesting web applications
for enhancing teaching and learning. Members may recall his talk at the
2010 ISMLA National Conference on Harnessing the power of blogs in the
MFL Classroom.
31
which they can share and comment
on each other’s creations in the
safety of a closed group. In essence,
Glogster is a tool allows your stu-
dents to practice - and you to assess
- all four skills (reading, writing,
speaking and listening) in the one
activity.
***
Web applications can fun for both
teachers and pupils, but often we
can become too preoccupied with
the tool itself and forget what its
purpose ought to be, which is to
support teaching and learning.
Whilst the tool may change the prin-
ciples remain the same. Let’s look at
how to plan a series of lessons be-
fore we look at each of the tools in
more detail, but first a word of cau-
tion:
Not a magic bullet
In order to stop the tool itself be-
coming an obstacle to successful
learning, how you plan and deliver
the series of lessons leading up to
the actual use of any of these web
applications is crucial to a successful
outcome. In addition, my experience
tells me that overusing any of these
tools may lead to your students
quickly becoming weary of any par-
ticular tool, as the novelty factor
wears off and their interest and en-
gagement wanes.
I use web applications regularly.
However, regularly does not mean
so often that my classes get bored of
them. To me regularly means once
or twice every half term. I also make
a point of alternating web applica-
among the members of the class
and, crucially, published on the
internet for for peers and parents to
see.
Setting up accounts for your classes
is easy: you simply need to register
your students and assign them a
username (I like to use the format
JohnS – first name plus first letter of
the surname – that way you and
your pupils know who individual pu-
pils are but nobody else does).
Storybird then automatically gener-
ates an account and a random pass-
word for them that they can change
to something more memorable on
first log-on.
Storybird has made my pupils to
want to write in the foreign lan-
guage. Because they enjoy using the
tool and there is a certain element of
competition - in that everyone’s sto-
ries will be shared - the work my
pupils have produced so far has
been of quite astonishing accuracy
and complexity.
Glogster
Glogster <http://edu.glogster.com>
allows pupils to create multimedia
posters that can include text, im-
ages, sound and video. Its intuitive
interface and visually attractive re-
sults has made it a popular addition
to our schemes of work for both
students and teachers alike. It is for
that reason that Glogster has been a
regular feature in my lessons for a
couple of years now.
Like Storybird, Glogster teachers to
manage classes and students to
have their own accounts, through
32
them to the web application in
question, perhaps handing out
individual user names and pass-
words if the tool allows for this. I
will give them five or ten minutes
to familiarise themselves with
the app, however I will soon ex-
plain very clearly what they need
to do. For example: “use your
homework and your corrections
to produce a 80 -100 words de-
scription of xxxx, ensuring that
you use xxxx and xxxx”. As
these web applications are avail-
able online, the task can be fin-
ished for homework.
• Finally, I will publish my stu-
dents’ work in our blog and en-
courage them to peer-assess by
leaving comments for one an-
other.
***
The Modern Foreign Languages De-
partment at our school, Nottingham
High School, has a dedicated lan-
guages blog that is used to keep
staff, pupils and parents informed of
all our developments and initiatives.
Its primary function, however, is to
showcase our pupils’ work, which
increasingly often involves using web
applications on a regular basis to
support learning.
Given the social nature of blogs,
where readers can comment on each
of the posts, the use of these web
applications together with the com-
menting capabilities of a blog has
resulted in very powerful peer as-
sessment. Our Department's com-
bined use of blogs and web applica-
tions so that any single class uses a
variety of tools throughout the aca-
demic year.
Lesson Planning
In order to ensure a successful out-
come, regardless of the tool, I gen-
erally follow this pattern in delivering
a series of lessons that will eventu-
ally culminate in the use of the web
application of choice:
• Our first lesson in the sequence
focuses on revising the appropri-
ate vocabulary, topic or gram-
matical structures. At the end of
the lesson, I set a relevant writ-
ing task for homework, with the
aim of basing the eventual use of
a specific web application upon
this task. I make sure that pupils
are made aware of what we are
doing, perhaps by showing them
examples of work by other stu-
dents who have previously used
this particular web application,
but I also make sure I tell them
why we are doing it, for example
“to increase the range and com-
plexity of your Spanish”. Setting
clear tasks that are perceived as
useful is fundamental to the
pedagogically successful comple-
tion of the task.
• In subsequent lessons we de-
velop the topic further and I re-
turn their exercise books with
highlighted errors and correc-
tions to their homework.
• Eventually, I will take the class to
an ICT room or a Digital Lan-
guage Laboratory and introduce
33
engaging the pupil in the learning
process to a greater extent.
So, I hope I have tempted you to
start looking at integrating these
web applications into the teaching
and learning that goes on in your
classroom or department.
Examples of pupils’ work using Voki,
Storybird, Glogster and other such
applications can be found by brows-
ing our depar tmenta l b log
www.nottinghamhighmfl.co.uk .
José Picardo
tions in this way was highly praised
in the recent ISI inspection report,
which stated: “Excellent use of peer
assessment was observed in modern
foreign languages, where pupils
used technology to comment on
each other’s oral and written work.”
We often establish a misleading di-
chotomy between the use of the
technologies with which our students
are already familiar and academic
rigour. In my view, the effective use
of new and emerging technologies,
far from undermining academic prin-
ciples, helps to underpin them by
UK Linguistics Olympiad
Dear colleague,
Looking for something to do with your Gifted and Talented? Want to show
that languages are fun? Then why not consider entering your school in the
UK Linguistics Olympiad. It's a competition for 11-18 students, in which they
have to solve linguistic data problems. It doesn’t rely on knowledge of a lan-
guage but trying to find patterns in the data. Similar competitions happen in
a number of other countries, though it's only recently that they've taken
place in English-speaking countries.
We have 2 rounds of competition in the UK and then select a team to repre-
sent the UK at the International competition. Round 1 is taken in schools any
time week commencing 6th Feb 2012 and students can be entered at either
foundation, intermediate or advanced level. Round 2 will be held at a UK
university in late March. If you want to find out more about UKLO, enter your
school for the 2012 competition or just register an interest, please visit our
website (www.uklo.org)
On behalf of the UKLO organising committee.
Richard Hudson
34
ANGLO-OMANI SOCIETY SPONSORED STUDENTS FOR A GAP YEAR
PERIOD IN OMAN
For a number of years the Anglo-Omani Society has sponsored students to
go to Oman for a period of three months to further their studies in the lan-
guage and gain experience in an Arab country. The Sultan’s School in Muscat
has hosted the students and this has proved most successful and beneficial
to both students and also the school. To qualify a student must fulfil one or
more of the criteria shown below:
1. To have a proven interest in the Middle East, particularly the Sultan-
ate of Oman, its history, development, architecture, geology and
place in the world.
2. Interested in conservation/endangered species in Oman and the Mid-
dle East. Eg Oryx project at Yaluni.
3. To be considering future employment in the private sector in the Mid-
dle East.
4. To be considering joining the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Brit-
ish Council or the Armed Forces.
5. To have learned Arabic at school and to wish to continue studying the
language either at University or elsewhere.
The study period in Oman should be for a minimum period of three months,
usually October to December and February to April. The best time to go to
Oman is in the beginning of autumn to the end of spring, but this is not a
limiting factor. Final dates are dependent on The Sultan’s School calendar.
In general terms the Society will pay for: return economy class airfares, ade-
quate pocket money to cover living expenses, medical insurance , car hire
and part cost of Arabic tuition.
Applications should be made in writing or by email to: Duncan Allen, Admin-
istrator, The Anglo-Omani Society, 34, Sackville Street, London W1S
3ED (Email: [email protected]) The letter, which
should be accompanied by a CV, should say why the student considers that
he/she is eligible. Students will be called for interview prior to being selected
to go to Oman. On return the student should furnish a report on their time in
Oman and may be asked to give a presentation to the Society on their ex-
periences.
35
36
On 1st April 2011, Network for Languages was launched. Created in order to
build on the achievements of the Links into Languages programme at the end
of its period of DfE funding, Network for Languages is an independent alliance
of universities with outstanding reputations for their work in language learn-
ing. It is committed to:
• excellence in language learning and teaching from school through univer-
sity and into the workplace
• building on the achievements of Links into Languages in championing lan-
guage teaching and teachers, delivering resources and creating network-
ing opportunities for language professionals.
Network for Languages works through established links with schools, colleges
and businesses in our areas, collaborating across the country through a net-
work of regional centres to achieve nationwide provision.
Network for Languages continues to be supportive of the importance of lan-
guages in schools and in lifelong learning, and aims to:
• Maintain and develop relevant and innovative continuous professional
development programmes for language teachers
• Support language teachers and other language professionals within the
changing policy landscape
• Disseminate good practice and research around language learning and
teaching
• Explore opportunities for collaboration
• Inform and influence policy in order to put the benefits of language learn-
ing at the forefront of the agenda.
Our approach is to collaborate actively with other associations and stake-
holders such as local authorities, the Association for Language Learning, and
Building on Links into Languages
37
Routes into Languages. You can read more about the organisations we work
with in our partners and resources area.
The regional centres will communicate with partners, professionals and
teachers over the next few weeks to give more detail on the latest and rap-
idly-changing picture.
If you would like to find out more about what’s on offer and sign up to the
mailing list for your nearest regional centre, please go to
www.networkforlanguages.org.uk
Our regional centres include:
• East – University of Cambridge
• East Midlands – Nottingham Trent University
• London – University of Westminster
• North East – Newcastle University
• North West – University of Manchester
• South East – University of Southampton
• South West – Bath Spa University
West Midlands – Aston University
• Yorkshire and Humber – University of Hull
Zena Hilton, University of Southampton – Network for Languages
South East
Free languages teaching resources now
available from LinkedUp
Links into Languages has ended, but resources produced by the 100+
LinkedUp projects are still accessible through the Links legacy website
www.linksintolanguages.ac.uk/linkedup . Over 40 projects are now online
and more are being added on a weekly basis. Free to download, these re-
sources are for teachers for primary, secondary, and post-16 languages.
From CLIL to transition, and from alternative accreditation to progression,
these materials have been created and tested by groups of practising teach-
ers and others working with languages.
38
Obituary - Professor Eric Hawkins
Grander broadsheets and other language association records have already
published long obituaries of Professor Eric Hawkins. ISMLA should join them
by doing him the honour of recording our gratefulness to him for his vast
influence over the profession of language teaching , in whatever school.
After a career as languages master which lead on to two headmasterships,
Eric became director of the Language Teaching Centre of the University of
York.. Among several publications, his book Modern Languages in the Cur-
riculum (of 1981) is of seminal importance. Its publication marked the point
at which the findings of psycholinguistics, the sobering influence of several
HMIs ( of the old school of Inspector -Advisor), the pressure of policy mak-
ers, the politics of national failure in language teaching and learning were all
encapsulated in one accessible sensible volume, which influenced Heads of
Languages and their ilk in the eighties and into the nineties.
Eric had been formed according to the classic pattern of a grammar school
education and a Cambridge degree, In his career and then in his book, he
responded to basic questions: what are the aims and objectives of language
learning and teaching? What methods produce success? Why does language
pedagogy have to be so different from that of other subjects? In any case,
hat success do we look for in language acquisition? Where does experience of
the country related to the language fit in the learning process? How do young
people best learn?
These themes have become the stock-in-trade of teaching linguists since
1981.Numerous nostrums, tiresome political interventions, crackpot inspec-
tors ( of the new kind), general British huffiness about foreign languages,
have all complicated these issues. They are still burning questions, were
ones that inspired the founding of ISMLA, and the present state of languages
in schools in this country leaves them as incandescently hot as ever.
Eric was not simply a linguist and thinker, but also a remarkably humane
person, to which the present writer pays tribute. His response to an invita-
tion to speak at a conference was to find the time. A letter to him always
received a thoughtful helpful reply. A crisis ‘phone call would evoke a
friendly, sympathetic and helpful response, giving as much time as it took to
help sort out dastardliness and tangles such as only the educational world
can produce.
Language teaching in this country needs people like Eric Hawkins, and we
can but express our admiration and gratitude for his contribution in his time.
Let him not be vox clamantis in deserto.
Anthony Earl Former Chairman, ISMLA
39
40