Summer Training Project
On “Exporters’ perception towards Government role in
promoting textile exports”
Under Guidance Of
Ms. Asha Sharma
Presented By
Sandeep Singh
94972238308
◦ It contributes about 14% industrial production.
◦ It contributes 3% to the total GDP.
◦ Second largest employer after agriculture.
◦ It contributes 25% of the total exports from India.
◦ Indian textile industry ranks 2nd after China.
Main Markets Main Markets Europe North America
SHARMAN SHAWLS
Company SiteCompany Site
Established in the year 1984, Sharman shawls pvt. Ltd., is a remarkable manufacturer, supplier and exporter of Textile Yarns and Fabrics.
Their product line reaches out to the clients spread across Argentina, Central America, Portugal, South Africa, Mexico, Spain, Jordan, Italy etc.
They manufacture yarns and fabrics from highly efficient machines, imported from Germany and Italy.
MISSIONMISSION
The company’s spirit of enterprise and dedication to quality symbolize their corporate culture where commitment leads to achievements.
The mission of the company is of continual improvement and sustained growth and of a family of workers who are given the best benefits and working environment.
VISIONVISION
Improving market reach out, particularly in the export markets through better networking with the market.
Strengths
Good technological base
High quality standards at affordable price
Commitment for growth
Large variety
Weaknesses
Lesser degree of professionalism.
Small size companies lack economies of scale.
Low investment in research and development.
Labour shortage
Opportunities
Market is expanding day by day, so the opportunity is there to
expand the business.
Removal of international trade barriers.
Threats
Introduction of better products by rivals/ competitors.
Less prices charged by the competitors.
FINANCIAL ANALYSISFINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Liquidity Ratios:
Current Ratio:
Particulars 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Current Assets
154751200.09 143441742.87 165560678.33
Current Liabilities
46270458.17 44575153.33 46203459.82
Current Ratio3.34 3.22 3.58
Quick Ratio:
Particulars 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Quick Assets 36840682.21 23197151.63 36669025.81
Current
Liabilities46270458.17 44575153.33
46203459.82
Quick Ratio 0.80 0.52 0.79
Absolute Liquid Ratio:
Particulars 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Absolute Liquid
Assets34003863.21 16185330.13 16588698.31
Current
Liabilities46270458.17 44575153.33 46203459.82
Absolute liquid
Ratio0.73 0.36 0.36
Operating Ratios:
Debtor Turnover Ratio:
Particulars 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Sales392593028.
00
397041321.
00
493120756.
50
Average Debtors
2836819.00
4924320.00
13546074.5
0
Debtor Turnover
Ratio
(in times)
138.39 80.63 36.40
Creditor Turnover Ratio:
Particulars 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Purchases238601768.3
6
224483660.3
9
302094979.7
7
Average
Creditors
27168283.10
30096428.00
30888335.00
Creditor
Turnover Ratio
(in times)
8.78 7.46 9.78
Profitability Ratios:
Gross Profit Ratio:
Particulars 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Gross Profit141394469.6
3
139544330.9
2
155583523.3
4
Sales392593028.0
0
397041321.0
0
493120756.5
0
Gross Profit
Ratio (%)36.02 35.15 31.55
Net Profit Ratio:
Particulars 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
09Net Profit 29682796.53 45010843.28 48323156.13
Sales392593028.0
0
397041321.0
0
493120756.5
0
Net Profit Ratio
(%)7.56 11.34 9.80
SALES
Trend of net Profit
INTRODUCTION TO PROJECTINTRODUCTION TO PROJECT
TITLETITLE
“Exporters’ perception towards Government role in promoting textile exports”
Objectives of the StudyObjectives of the Study
To know the satisfaction level or perception of textile
exporters towards various policies and services of
Government.
To know the different problems being faced by
exporters.
Research design: Descriptive research design
Data Collection Primary Data
Using Questionnaires and unstructured interviews.
Secondary Data
From Internet.
Sampling Design:
Universe: All Textile Exporters
Population: All textile exporters in Ludhiana
Sampling Unit: Any textile exporter of Ludhiana
Sample size: 25 textile exporters.
Limitations of studyLimitations of study
Lack of professionalism among exporters.
Sample size was small.
Non cooperation by some exporters.
Continent or region wise Continent or region wise exports of textileexports of textile
%age of exporters exporting in diff continents
3244
12 12
52
160
102030405060
continents
%ag
e o
f exp
ort
ers
%age of exporters
Satisfaction level towards govt. Satisfaction level towards govt. support in promoting exportssupport in promoting exports
Options No. of respondents FactorHS 4 5 20SS 12 4 48N 7 3 21SD 2 2 4HD 0 1 0
Mean= 3.7
Response regarding Response regarding continuing the exports in continuing the exports in near futurenear future
%age of exporter want to continue exporting
76
0
24
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Yes No Not sure
%ag
e o
f exp
ort
ers
%afe of exporters
Response regarding Response regarding planning of extending the planning of extending the exports in near futureexports in near future
%age of expoters want to extend their exports in near future
48
52
0
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
yes no
option
%ag
e o
f exp
ort
ers
Response regarding Response regarding availability of sufficient availability of sufficient subsidiessubsidies
52
48
0
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
yes no
option
Government’s efficiency to Government’s efficiency to control the export-import of control the export-import of restricted textilesrestricted textiles
Govt.'s efficiency to control export-import of restricted textiles
92
8
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
yes no
option
%ag
e o
f ex
po
rter
s
Satisfaction level with respect Satisfaction level with respect to EPCto EPC
Options No. of respondents FactorHS 2 5 10SS 11 4 44N 10 3 30SD 2 2 4HD 0 1 0
Mean= 3.5
Difficulty involved in Difficulty involved in obtaining export licenseobtaining export license
difficulty involved in obtaining export license
28
720
01020304050607080
yes no
option
%ag
e o
f exp
ort
ers
Satisfaction level with respect to EXIM Satisfaction level with respect to EXIM policypolicy
Option No. of respondents FactorHS 1 5 5SS 10 4 40N 10 3 30SD 4 2 8HD 0 1 0
Mean= 3.3
No. of exporters also No. of exporters also involved in importinginvolved in importing
%age of exporters involved in importing
5644
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
yes no
option
%ag
e o
f exp
ort
ers
Satisfaction level of exporters Satisfaction level of exporters regarding duty drawback regarding duty drawback provisionsprovisions
Option Factor No. of respondentsHighly satisfied 5 2 10Somewhat satisfied
4 4 16
Neutral 3 6 18Somewhat dissatisfied
2 2 4
Highly dissatisfied
1 0 0
Mean= 3.4
Maximum time limit allowed Maximum time limit allowed to re-export unused to re-export unused imported goodsimported goods
Time allowed before re-exporting the unused imported goods
79
21
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
less than 2 years more than 2 years
Time limit
%ag
e o
f exp
ort
ers
Time limit allowed before Time limit allowed before re-exporting the used re-exporting the used imported goodsimported goods
Time limit before re-exporting used imported goods
21 21
58
0
0
010203040506070
less than 1year
1-2 year 2-3 year more than 3years
Time period
%ag
e o
f exp
ort
ers
Satisfaction level of exporters with Satisfaction level of exporters with regard to public/ government regard to public/ government warehouseswarehouses
Option No. of respondents factorHS 1 5 5SS 9 4 36N 10 3 30SD 4 2 8HD 1 1 1
Mean= 3.2
Ranking of Satisfaction Ranking of Satisfaction level towards various level towards various warehouse serviceswarehouse services
satisfaction towards different warehouse services
3.2
3.48 3.523.68
0
2.93
3.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.8
safety rent &charges
convenience clearance
services
mean
sco
re
Findings Findings
Europe and north America are the most preferred
destination of textile exporters.
Lack of professionalism in the industry
Large number of exporters are not satisfied with various
govt. policies.
Government is not providing up to the mark warehouse
facilities.
contd/contd/
Exporters have to depend upon importing quality inputs
Business of textile exports is quite profitable.
suggestionssuggestions
Better warehouse facilities should be provided by the
govt.
Exporting units should adopt more professionalized
approach.
The government should try to provide quality inputs.
.
contd/contd/
Exporters view point should be taken into
considerations, while framing major policies.
Exporters should try to equip themselves with latest
knowledge in the related field.
Thank you!!!!!!