+ All Categories

SUPG

Date post: 02-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: kaseem-sullivan
View: 45 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
SUPG STABILIZATION PARAMETERS CALCULATED FROM THE QUADRATURE-POINT COMPONENTS OF THE ELEMENT-LEVEL MATRICES ECCOMAS 2004 J. ED AKIN TAYFUN TEZDUYAR Mechanical Engineering, Rice University Houston, Texas [email protected] http://www.mems.rice.edu/TAFSM/. Quadrature-point based  defined:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
48
TAFSM SUPG STABILIZATION PARAMETERS CALCULATED FROM THE QUADRATURE- POINT COMPONENTS OF THE ELEMENT-LEVEL MATRICES ECCOMAS 2004 J. ED AKIN TAYFUN TEZDUYAR Mechanical Engineering, Rice University Houston, Texas [email protected] http://www.mems.rice.edu/TAFSM/
Transcript

TAFSM

SUPGSTABILIZATION PARAMETERS

CALCULATED FROM THE QUADRATURE-POINT COMPONENTS OF THE ELEMENT-LEVEL MATRICES

ECCOMAS 2004

J. ED AKINTAYFUN TEZDUYAR

Mechanical Engineering, Rice UniversityHouston, Texas

[email protected]

http://www.mems.rice.edu/TAFSM/

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

Quadrature-point based defined:

c = ∑q c q , k~ = ∑q k~ q

(S1)q = || cq || / || k~q ||

I = ∑q (S1)q f (c q , k~ q , …)

Element work arrays: c q and k~ q

TAFSM

TAFSM

Solution surface from Q4 elements and

element-based S1

TAFSM

Contours for mesh Q4:SUGN1 (top), element based S1 (lower left),

quadrature-point based S1 (lower right)

TAFSM

Contours for T3 mesh:SUGN1 (top), element based S1 (lower left),

quadrature-point based S1 (lower right)

TAFSM

Quadrature-point-based S1 contours for:

Q4 mesh (top), Q9 mesh (lower left), Q16 mesh (lower right)

TAFSM

Element-based S1 contours for:

Q4 mesh (top), Q9 mesh (lower left), Q16 mesh (lower right)

TAFSM

Quadrature-point-based S1 contours for:

T3 mesh (top), T6 mesh (lower left), T10 mesh (lower right)

TAFSM

Element-based S1 contours for:

T3 mesh (top), T6 mesh (lower left), T10 mesh (lower right)

TAFSM

Constant y-plane solution for S1 from:Q4 mesh (top), T3 mesh (bottom)

TAFSM

Constant y-plane solution for Q4, Q9, Q16 for S1:quadrature-point-based (top), element-based (bottom)

TAFSM

Constant y-plane solution for T3, T6, T10 for S1:quadrature-point-based (top), element-based (bottom)

TAFSM

Constant x-plane solution for quadrature-point-based S1:Q4, Q9, Q16 meshes (top), T3, T6, T10 meshes (bottom)

TAFSM

Discrete Point Values of • The previous contours hide

information because they omit the mesh detail and are “smoothed” through different point locations:

– Element-based at element centroid

– Quadrature-point-based positions

– Nodal-point-based positions

TAFSM

Finest T3 mesh followed by zoom-in by center flow

rotation point for contour of:

T3, T6, T10 elements,

Q4, Q8, Q16 elements.

Local Tau values are generally proportional to element length

through the point, in the direction of the local velocity.

TAFSM

Full T3 Mesh

TAFSM

Zoom on T3 Mesh

TAFSM

Zoom on T6 Mesh

TAFSM

Full zoom T6 point values

TAFSM

Zoom on T10 Mesh

TAFSM

Zoom on Q8 Mesh

TAFSM

Full zoom on Q8 point values

TAFSM

Zoom on Q16 mesh

TAFSM

Conclusions

Quadrature-point norm based values are efficient to compute. They yield higher values in local regions where the unit vector s or r rapidly changes its direction.

The element-based norm is a general framework that automatically accounts for local length scales.

Both norm-based methods decrease as the

element polynomial order increases.

Our favorite: element-based norm

TAFSM

APPENDIX 1Regular T6 mesh uniform flow

field test angles:

0 (horizontal edges),

23 (centroid),

45 (long edge),

90 (vertical edges)

TAFSM

0 degrees

TAFSM

23 degrees

TAFSM

45 degrees

TAFSM

90 degrees

TAFSM

APPENDIX 2

Results from previous ways to evaluate :

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM

TAFSM


Recommended