Supplement of Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 793–805, 2020https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-793-2020-supplement© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed underthe Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Supplement of
Compound warm–dry and cold–wet events over the MediterraneanPaolo De Luca et al.
Correspondence to: Paolo De Luca ([email protected])
The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC BY 4.0 License.
1 Supplementary DataTo improve the robustness of our results we make use of two additional reanalysis datasets from the European Centre for
Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) over the 1979-2018 period. These are: ERA-Interim with horizontal resolution
of 0.75◦ (Dee et al., 2011) and ERA5 10-member ensemble (0.5◦) (C3S, 2017), hereafter termed "ERA5 ensemble". The
Mediterranean (MED) domain follows the "Full Mediterranean (FMED)" region described in Giorgi and Lionello (2008). For5
ERA-Interim, we use 27.75–48.00 ◦N, 9.75 ◦W–39.00 ◦E, whereas for the ERA5 ensemble we use 28.00–48.00 ◦N, 9.50W–
39.00 ◦E. To study compound events, we compute daily Tmax, Tmin and P, based on 6- and 3-hourly data from ERA5 ensemble
respectively for Tmax (Tmin) and P, and 12-hourly data from ERA-Interim. We also use daily-mean SLP values, computed
by averaging 6-hourly ERA-Interim and ERA5 ensemble data. For ERA5 ensemble, we compute the 10-member ensemble
mean for all the dynamical systems metrics and variables of interest. It is important to note that the dynamical systems metrics10
are first computed on the individual ensemble members and then their values averaged for the trend analyses, whereas for the
composite maps we first compute the composite for each ensemble member and then we average them. Lastly, we also use
ERA5 daily mean convective available potential energy (CAPE, JKg−1) and ERA5 daily snowfall (mm), the former computed
by averaging daily 6-hourly steps and the latter by summing the 1-hourly time-steps as for P. We note that Tmax (Tmin), SLP
and CAPE are obtained from instantaneous values, whereas P and snowfall from forecasted fields.15
2
2 Supplementary Figures
JJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJA ERA−Interim slope=8e−04, p−val
DJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJFDJF ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA5 slope=1e−04, p−val=0.357ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279ERA−Interim slope=1e−04, p−val=0.279
ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258ERA5 ensemble slope=2e−04, p−val=0.258
0.055
0.065
0.075
0.085
0.095
0.105
0.115
0.125
1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015Time (years)
α
ERA5 ERA−Interim ERA5 ensemble
Figure S2. As Figure 1a but for winter December-January-February (DJF) and α computed from Tmin and P.
4
●
●●
●●
●●
●●● ●●● ●
● ●
●●
●
● ●●●
●●
● ●●● ●
●
●●●
●●●
● ●
●
0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14
300.
530
1.5
302.
5(b) ERA−Interim JJA rho=0.74, p−val=0, R^2=0.59
alpha
tem
p m
ax (K
)
●
●●
●●●● ●● ● ● ●
●●●
●
● ●●
●● ●● ●
●●●
● ●● ●
● ●●●
●●
●●
●
0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15
299.
530
0.5
301.
5
(c) ERA5 ensemble JJA rho=0.72, p−val=0, R^2=0.56
alpha
tem
p m
ax (K
)
●
●●
●●●
● ●●●●● ●
● ●●
● ●●
●●●● ●
●●●● ●
● ●
● ●● ●
●●
●●
●
0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15
299.
530
0.5
301.
5
(a) ERA5 JJA rho=0.79, p−val=0, R^2=0.66
alpha
tem
p m
ax (K
)
Figure S3. Linear regressions and Spearman’s correlation tests between JJA mean Tmax and JJA co-recurrence ratio (α) within the 1979-
2018 period over the MED. (a) ERA5; (b) ERA-Interim; and (c) ERA5 ensemble mean. The Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient, relative
p-value and coefficient of determination (R2) are shown for each reanalysis product.
5
JJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJA ERA5 slope=9e−04, p−val
JJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−onlyJJA Land−only ERA5 slope=0.001, p−val
JJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJA ERA−Interim slope=0.0051, p−val
0
100
200
300
400
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
(a)
0
100
200
300
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
(b)
Months
CD
Es
Cou
nt
ERA−Interim ERA5 ensemble
Figure S7. As Figure 3 but for ERA-Interim (blue) and ERA5 ensemble mean (black).
9
−0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00SLP (hPa) Anomaly Means
(a) ERA−Interim JJA
−0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00SLP (hPa) Anomaly Means
(b) ERA5 ensemble JJA
−0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Tmax (K) Anomaly Means
(c) ERA−Interim JJA
−0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Tmax (K) Anomaly Means
(d) ERA5 ensemble JJA
−1 0 1 2 3P (mm) Anomaly Means
(e) ERA−Interim JJA
−1 0 1 2 3P (mm) Anomaly Means
(f) ERA5 ensemble JJA
Figure S8. As Figure 4a,c,e but for (a), (c), (e) ERA-Interim and (b), (d), (f) ERA5 ensemble mean.
10
−80 0 80 160 240 320CAPE (JKg−1), Anomaly Means
Figure S9. As Figure 4e but for ERA5 daily mean convective available potential energy (CAPE, JKg−1).
11
−4 −2 0 2 4SLP (hPa) Anomaly Means
(a) ERA−Interim DJF
−4 −2 0 2 4SLP (hPa) Anomaly Means
(b) ERA5 ensemble DJF
−2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Tmin (K) Anomaly Means
(c) ERA−Interim DJF
−2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Tmin (K) Anomaly Means
(d) ERA5 ensemble DJF
−2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7P (mm) Anomaly Means
(e) ERA−Interim DJF
−2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7P (mm) Anomaly Means
(f) ERA5 ensemble DJF
Figure S10. As Figure 4b,d,f but for (a), (c), (e) ERA-Interim and (b), (d), (f) ERA5 ensemble mean.
12
−1 0 1 2 3 4Snowfall (mm) Anomaly Means
Figure S11. As Figure 4f, but for snowfall anomaly means (mm).
13
−1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5SLP (hPa) Anomaly Means
(a) JJA
−4 −3 −2 −1 0SLP (hPa) Anomaly Means
(b) DJF
−0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Tmax (K) Anomaly Means
(c) JJA
−2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Tmin (K) Anomaly Means
(d) DJF
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20P (mm) Anomaly Means
(e) JJA
0 4 8 12 16 20P (mm) Anomaly Means
(f) DJF
Figure S12. As Figure 4 but for anomalies > 90th and < 10th quantiles.
14
JJA ERA−Interim
0
50
100
150
−1 0 1 2
Cou
nt
(a)
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
−1 0 1 2
F(x
)JJA ERA−Interim
0
250
500
750
−1 0 1 2 3
Cou
nt
(b)
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
−1 0 1 2 3
F(x
)
JJA ERA5 ensemble
0
100
200
300
−1 0 1 2Tmax (K) Anomaly Means
Cou
nt
(c)
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
−1 0 1 2Tmax (K) Anomaly Means
F(x
)
JJA ERA5 ensemble
0
500
1000
1500
−1 0 1 2 3P (mm) Anomaly Means
Cou
nt(d)
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
−1 0 1 2 3P (mm) Anomaly Means
F(x
)
Figure S13. As Figure 5a-b but for (a)-(b) ERA-Interim (blue) and (c)-(d) ERA5 ensemble mean (black). The anomaly means correspond to
the ones in Figure S8c-f.
15
DJF ERA−Interim
0
30
60
90
−2 −1 0 1
Cou
nt
(a)
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
−2 −1 0 1
F(x
)DJF ERA−Interim
0
100
200
300
400
−2 0 2 4 6 8
Cou
nt
(b)
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
−2 0 2 4 6 8
F(x
)
DJF ERA5 ensemble
0
100
200
300
−2 −1 0 1Tmin (K) Anomaly Means
Cou
nt
(c)
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
−2 −1 0 1Tmin (K) Anomaly Means
F(x
)
DJF ERA5 ensemble
0
250
500
750
1000
−2 0 2 4 6 8P (mm) Anomaly Means
Cou
nt(d)
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
−2 0 2 4 6 8P (mm) Anomaly Means
F(x
)
Figure S14. As Figure 5c-d but for (a)-(b) ERA-Interim (blue) and (c)-(d) ERA5 ensemble mean (black). The anomaly means correspond to
the ones in Figure S10c-f.
16
10 20 30 40 50 60 70JJA Warm−Dry %
(a) ERA−Interim
10 20 30 40 50 60 70JJA Warm−Dry %
(b) ERA5 ensemble
Figure S15. As Figure 6a but for (a) ERA-Interim and (b) ERA5 ensemble mean.
17
10 20 30 40DJF Cold−Wet %
(a) ERA−Interim
10 20 30 40DJF Cold−Wet %
(b) ERA5 ensemble
Figure S16. As Figure 6b but for (a) ERA-Interim and (b) ERA5 ensemble mean.
18
JJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJAJJA ERA5 slope=0.001, p−val
References
C3S: ERA5: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate, https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp{#}!/home,
2017.
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer,20
P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haim-
berger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz,
B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis:
configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137, 553–597,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011.25
Giorgi, F. and Lionello, P.: Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region, Global and Planetary Change, 63, 90 – 104,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005, mediterranean climate: trends, variability and change, 2008.
20
https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp{#}!/homehttps://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005