+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic...

Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic...

Date post: 16-Mar-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
28
Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression estimates between different biological replicates of Chlamydomonas strain CC4532 Cells of Chlamydomonas strain CC4532 were collected at the indicated time point after transfer to N-free medium, mRNA was purified and cDNA was generated for RNA-Seq analysis. Expression estimates of the Au10.2 gene models are reported in units of RPKM (Mortazavi et al., 2008). Expression estimates for each of the 12338 expressed genes were compared between two replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ) was calculated and is presented in the figure. Comparison of nitrogen- replete samples (0 h) between 1 h and 8 h time course (A), nitrogen-replete samples (0 h) between 8 h and 48 h time course (B), 30 min nitrogen-deprived samples between 1 h and 8 h time course (C) and 8 h nitrogen-deprived samples between 8 h and 48 h time course (D). Supplemental Figure 1 A 0 h mRNA abundance (S, RPKM) 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 mRNA abundance (M, RPKM) ρ = 0.92 ρ = 0.95 mRNA abundance (M, RPKM) 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 mRNA abundance (L, RPKM) 0 h B mRNA abundance (S, RPKM) 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 mRNA abundance (M, RPKM) ρ = 0.88 0.5 h C mRNA abundance (M, RPKM) 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 mRNA abundance (L, RPKM) ρ = 0.92 8 h D Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523
Transcript
Page 1: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression estimates between different biological replicates of Chlamydomonas strain CC4532Cells of Chlamydomonas strain CC4532 were collected at the indicated time point after transfer to N-free medium, mRNA was purified and cDNA was generated for RNA-Seq analysis. Expression estimates of the Au10.2 gene models are reported in units of RPKM (Mortazavi et al., 2008). Expression estimates for each of the 12338 expressed genes were compared between two replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ) was calculated and is presented in the figure. Comparison of nitrogen-replete samples (0 h) between 1 h and 8 h time course (A), nitrogen-replete samples (0 h) between 8 h and 48 h time course (B), 30 min nitrogen-deprived samples between 1 h and 8 h time course (C) and 8 h nitrogen-deprived samples between 8 h and 48 h time course (D).

Supplemental Figure 1

A 0 h

mRNA abundance (S, RPKM)0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

mR

NA

abun

danc

e (M

, RP

KM

)

ρ = 0.92 ρ = 0.95

mRNA abundance (M, RPKM)0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

mR

NA

abun

danc

e (L

, RP

KM

)

0 hB

mRNA abundance (S, RPKM)0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

mR

NA

abun

danc

e (M

, RP

KM

)

ρ = 0.88

0.5 hC

mRNA abundance (M, RPKM)0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

mR

NA

abun

danc

e (L

, RP

KM

)

ρ = 0.92

8 hD

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 2: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 2: Clustering of 4288 differentially expressed genes identified in the CC4532 RNA-Seq experiments A model-based clustering approach was used to group the 4288 differential expressed genes from the RNA-Seq data in Chlamydomonas strain CC4532 (MBClusterSeq) into 100 clusters. The figure shows the expression patterns for all significantly differentially expressed genes in each cluster for the following 16 time points: +N, 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 45, 60 min (from the 1 h experiment), 4 h (from the 8 h experiment) and 8, 12, 24, 48 h (from the 48 h experiment). The y-axis represents the log2 fold changes relative to the mean expression across all time points for each gene. Red circles indicate average fold changes within each particular cluster.

1 12 26 61 94 77 25 72 2 9

28 83 48 55 6 86 45 87 51 18

37 20 71 39 42 3 5 30 65 32

64 19 57 76 81 21 33 15 93 100

54 43 49 85 68 27 84 96 29 63

79 40 97 50 99 10 38 70 13 22

4 66 62 34 60 56 7 14 82 78

90 31 80 36 88 58 91 95 44 52

98 73 59 67 16 47 24 46 8 17

23 11 69 74 35 41 53 89 75 92

Supplemental Figure 2

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 3: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 3: Summary of the experimental data gathered from the proteomics time-course experimentA total of 3,724,641 spectra were detected in 218 120 min-long chromatographic separations and subsequent tandem mass spectrometry runs. Using IOMIQS metasearch, that facilitates four different search algorithms (Mascot (Perkins et al., 1999), Sequest (Eng et al., 1994), OMSSA (Geer et al., 2004) and X!Tandem (Craig and Beavis, 2004)), we were able to match 1,636,469 spectra to class 1a peptide sequences, as well as 3,110 SPMs to class 1b, 1,668 SPMs to class 2a, 20,578 SPMs to class 2b, 152,475 spectra to class 3a peptides and 1,667,482 SPMs to class 3b, according to the classification principles of (Qeli and Ahrens, 2010). After filtering at the peptide level by a false positive threshold < 5 %, the protein identifications were further filtered by removing protein or protein groups with fewer than 7 identification out of 9 time points. The filtration resulted in 1,153 mainly class 1a proteins. For peptide quantification 15N metabolic labeling with a uniform 15N-labeled standard (Mühlhaus et al., 2011) and the algorithm ASAPRatio (Li et al., 2003) were used. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) over time revealed 635 protein groups differentially regulated.

Searchdatabase: Aug 10.2 + Chlpst+ mito

MascotX! Tandem

SEQUESTOMSSA

IQMIQS metaseach used engines

CleanUP:IdentScore calculation

(median over samples)

Peptide statistics

1.636 469 no° 1A3 110 no° 1B1 668 no° 2A

20 578 no° 2B152 475 no° 3A

1.667 482 no° 3B

LC-MS/MS LTQ-Orbitrap runs

measured spectramatched spectra (SPM)

218

3.724 6413.217 632

MS run information:

9 timepoints with 3 biological replicates

Protein inference

Occam’s razor principle applied classwise to peptide

CleanUP:max. 2/9 timepoint/s missing per protein

10 706 no° 1A0 no° 1B0 no° 2A

82 no° 2B74 no° 3A

957 no° 3B

10 706 no° 1A0 no° 1B0 no° 2A

49 no° 2B21 no° 3A

466 no° 3B

protein groupdistinct by: protein

Protein statistics

Functional annotaion

MapMan for Chlamydomonas v1.0

1 103 no° 1A0 no° 1B0 no° 2A8 no° 2B

45 no° 3A138 no° 3B

1 103 no° 1A0 no° 1B0 no° 2A4 no° 2B8 no° 3A

38 no° 3B

protein groupdistinct by: protein

Protein statistics

one way ANOVA

600 no° 1A0 no° 1B0 no° 2A2 no° 2B

43 no° 3A122 no° 3B

600 no° 1A0 no° 1B0 no° 2A1 no° 2B7 no° 3A

27 no° 3B

protein groupdistinct by: protein

Protein statistics

Supplemental Figure 3

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 4: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 4: Clustering of 635 differentially accumulating proteins upon transfer to N-free mediaThe centered protein changes were clustered using k-means algorithm with euclidean distance metric. The number of cluster was determined using gap statistic taking into account the original dataset's shape (Tibshirani et al., 2001). Gap statistic suggested two major trends within the protein data which can be further split in 6 clusters for a more detailed visualization of the temporal expression. The clusters are sorted from strong increased (A) to strong decreased abundance (F). Plotted is the 14N/15N ratio on a log2 transformed scale at the indicated time point after transfer to nitrogen-free media of each protein within the cluster (light grey) as well as the median ratio (dark grey). Error bars indicate standard deviation between all proteins within the cluster.

Supplemental Figure 4

A Cluster 1

time in –N (h)

-3-2-10123

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48

C Cluster 3

time in –N (h)

-3-2-10123

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48

D Cluster 4

time in –N (h)

-3-2-10123

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48

B Cluster 2

time in –N (h)

-3-2-10123

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48

E Cluster 5

time in –N (h)

-3-2-10123

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48

F Cluster 6

time in –N (h)

-3-2-10123

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 5: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 5: Photosynthesis

A LHCII

LHCBM1 LHCBM2 LHCBM3 LHCBM4 LHCBM5 LHCBM6LHCBM7 LHCBM8 LHCBM9 LHCB4 LHCB5 LHCB7

LHCBM1 LHCBM2/7 LHCBM3LHCBM4/6 LHCBM5 LHCBM8

CP29 CP26

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

protein (CC4532)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

eoverlay (CC4532)

PSBO PSBP1 PSBQ PSBR PSBW PSBX PSBY2 PSB28 D1 CP47 Cyt b559 αCP43D2 Cyt b559 β

OEE1OEE2

OEE3

B PSII

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

protein (CC4532)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4532CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) overlay (CC4532)

PETC PETM PETN PETO Cyt f Cyt b6 Rieske PETM

C b6f complex

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

protein (CC4532)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4532CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) overlay (CC4532)

Supplemental Figure 5: mRNA and protein abundances for components of the photosynthetic complexesmRNA and protein abundances are summarized for light harvesting complex II (A), photosystem II (B), cytochrome b6f complex (C), light harvesting complex I (D), photosystem I (E) and plastidic ATP synthase (F).Left: Relative mRNA abundance (% max) in Chlamydomonas strain CC4349, CC4348 (sta6) and CC4532 (48 h time course). See legend for individual gene names (left, italic). Cells were collected at the indicated time point after transfer to N-free medium, mRNA was purified and cDNA was generated for RNA-Seq analysis. Expression estimates of Au10.2 models are reported in units of RPKM (Mortazavi et al., 2008). The maximal RPKM was set to 1 to compare relative expression between individual genes.

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 6: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 5: Photosynthesis - continued

D LHCI

LHCA1 LHCA2 LHCA3 LHCA4 LHCA5LHCA6 LHCA7 LHCA8 LHCA9

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

LHCA2 LHCA4 LHCA7LHCA8 LHCA9

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

protein (CC4532)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4532CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) overlay (CC4532)

PSAD PSAE PSAF PSAG PSAHPSAI PSAK PSAL PSAN

psaA psaB PSADPSAE PSAH

E PSI

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

protein (CC4532)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4532CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) overlay (CC4532)

ATPC ATPD ATPG alpha (α)beta (β)gamma (γ)

delta (δ)epsilon (ε)

Su ISu II

F ATP synthase

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

protein (CC4532)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4532CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) overlay (CC4532)

Supplemental Figure 5 - continuedRight: Abundance of proteins in each sample is compared to a 15N labeled standard (see legend on the right for individual protein names). The 14N/15N ratio was obtained using quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis and is expressed here on a log2 transformed scale. Cells were collected at the indicated time point after transfer to nitrogen-free media. Middle: Overlay of average relative abundance of mRNAs (grey) and proteins (pink) in Chlamydomonas strain CC4532, average protein abundances are drawn similar to Figure 2 in the main body to allow for comparison. Error bars indicate standard deviation between individual proteins/RNAs and lower case protein names on the right indicate origin from the plastid genome.

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 7: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 6: Respiration

B Succinate dehydrogenase (Complex II)

SDH1 SDH2 SDH3 SDH4

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

Su FeS Su IV

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5CC4532 protein (CC4532)overlay (CC4532)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

A NADH ubiquinone oxidoreductase (Complex I)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

NUO9 NUO13 NUO17NUO21 NUOA9 NUOB8NUOP5 NUOS1 NUOS6

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5CC4532 protein (CC4532)overlay (CC4532)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

NUO3NUO5NUO6NUO7NUO8

NUO9NUO10NUO11NUO13NUO17

NUO21NUOA1NUOA8NUOA9NUOB4

NUOB8NUOB10NUOB12NUOB13NUOB14

NUOB16NUOB18NUOB22NUOP1NUOP3

NUOP4NUOP5NUOS1NUOS4NUOS4b

NUOS5NUOS6CAG1CAG2CAG3

ACP1CAH9

Supplemental Figure 6: mRNA and protein abundance of components of the respiratory complexesPicture composed as described in Supplemental Figure 5 (see legends for individual gene/protein names). Average protein abundances for mitochondrial complexes are drawn in cyan similar to Figure 2 in the main body to allow for comparison. mRNA and protein abundances of NADH ubiquinone oxidoreductase (A, Complex I), succinate dehydrogenase (B, Complex II), ubiquinol cytochrome c oxidoreductase (C, Complex III), cytochrome c oxidase (D, Complex IV) and mitochondrial ATP synthase (E, Complex V).

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 8: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 6: Respiration - continued

QCR1 QCR6 QCR7 QCR8 QCR9QCR10 MPPA1 MPPA2 CYC1 RIP1

Core 1 Su VII Su XMPPA2 Cyt c1

C Ubiquinol cytochrome c oxidoreductase (Complex III)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5CC4532 protein (CC4532)overlay (CC4532)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

COX2B COX3 COX4COX2ACOX5C COX12 COX13 COX90

D Cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV)

COX2B COX4COX12 COX90

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5CC4532 protein (CC4532)overlay (CC4532)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

E ATP synthase (Complex V)

alpha (α)beta (β)gamma (γ)delta (δ)

ASA1ASA2ASA3

ASA4ASA7ASA8

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5CC4532 protein (CC4532)overlay (CC4532)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

ATP1AATP1BATP2

ATP3ATP4ATP5

ATP6ATP9AATP9B

ATP15ASA1ASA2

ASA3ASA4ASA5

ASA6ASA7ASA8

ASA9

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 9: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 7: Calvin-Benson cycle

A Calvin-Benson cycle enzymes

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6CC4532 protein (CC4532)overlay (CC4532)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

PGKFBA/SBASBPase

GAPDHFBPaseRPI

TPICTRKPRK

Rubisco (SSU) Rubisco (LSU)RBCS2 PGK1 GAP3 TPIC1 FBA3 FBP1 TRK1 SEBP1RPI1 PRK1

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

B Rubisco small subunit (RBCS2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4C Phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK1)

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4D Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAP3)

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4E Triose-phosphate isomerase (TPIC1)

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4I Sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase (SEBP1)

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4H Transketolase (TRK1)

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4F FBP and SBP aldolase (FBA3)

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4G Fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase (FBP1)

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

Supplemental Figure 7: mRNA and protein abundance of enzymes involved in Calvin-Benson cyclePicture composed as described in Supplemental Figure 5 (see legends for individual gene/protein names). mRNA and protein abundance of all Calvin-Benson cycle enzymes (A) and overlays of each individual enzyme (B-L), as labelled. For each enzyme only the highest expressed potentially encoding gene and corresponding protein is shown.

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 10: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4L Phosphoribulokinase (PRK1)

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4J Phosphopentose isomerase (RPI1)

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4K Phosphopentose epimerase (RPE1)

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

Supplemental Figure 7: Calvin-Benson cycle - continued

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 11: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 8: mRNA abundances of enzymes involved in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis and degradationRelative mRNA abundance (% max) of enzymes from tetrapyrrole metabolism in Chlamydomonas strain CC4349, CC4348 (sta6) and CC4532 (all experiments), see legends for individual gene names. mRNA was analyzed similar to what was described in Supplemental Figure 5. mRNA abundance of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis enzymes (A) and candidate RNAs potentially involved in chlorophyll degradation (B, 48 h experiment (L)). Absolute mRNA abundance (RPKM) from 0 to 2 h N deprivation in Chlamydomonas strain CC4532, CC4349 and CC4348 (sta6) is given for chlorophyll b reductases (C), chlorophyllases and pheophytinase (D), pheophorbide a oxygenases (E) and CGL61 (F).

Supplemental Figure 8: Tetrapyrrole metabolism

A RNA abundance of enzymes involved in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) GTS2GSAPBGD1UROD1UROD3PPX1CHLI1CHLH1GUN4CTH1BPORCAO

GTS1HEMAALADUROSUROD2CPX1CHLDCHLI2CHLH2CHLMCRD1DVR1CHLG

B RNA abundance of enzymes invovled in chlorophyll degradation

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) NYC1_NOL_HCARCLH1CLH2_PPHPAO3PAO9CGL61

0

10

20

30

40

50

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349 CC4348(sta6)

0 0.5 2

NYC1 (Cre12.g517700)

0

10

20

30

40

50

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

_NOL (Cre14.g608800)

0

4

8

12

16

20

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

_HCAR (Cre11.g468700)

CC4348(sta6)

C RNA abundance of potential chlorophyll b reductases

D RNA abundance of potential chlorophyllases and pheophytinase

0

10

20

30

40

50

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

CLH1 (Cre03.g148750)

0

4

8

12

16

20

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

CLH2 (Cre12.g484750)

0

4

8

12

16

20

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

_PPH (Cre12.g514700)

CC4348(sta6)

CC4348(sta6)

CC4348(sta6)

CC4348(sta6)

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 12: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 8: Tetrapyrrole metabolism - continued

E RNA abundance of candidate pheophorbide a oxygenases

0

4

8

12

16

20

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

PAO6 (Cre06.g305650)

0

4

8

12

16

20R

NA

abu

ndan

ce (R

PK

M)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

PAO8 (Cre13.g583050)

0

4

8

12

16

20

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

PAO9 (Cre13.g600650)

0

4

8

12

16

20

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

PAO1 (Cre17.g724700)

0

10

20

30

40

50

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

PAO2 (Cre17.g724600)

0

4

8

12

16

20

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

PAO3 (Cre10.g450550)

0

4

8

12

16

20

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

)

0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 2time in –N (h)

CC4532 CC4349

0 0.5 2

CGL61 (Cre12.g487500)

CC4348(sta6)

F RNA abundance of CGL61

CC4348(sta6)

CC4348(sta6)

CC4348(sta6)

CC4348(sta6)

CC4348(sta6)

CC4348(sta6)

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 13: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 9: Alignment of putative chlorophyll b reductases from Oryza sativa, Arabidopsis thaliana and Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiAmino acid sequences of NYC1 from Oryza sativa (Os-NYC1, GenBankID: BAF49740.1), its putative orthologs in Arabidopsis thaliana (At-NYC1, TAIR: AT4G13250) and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Cr-NYC1, Phytozome: Cre12.g517700) as well as the closely related chlorophyll b reductase NOL from rice (Os-NOL, GenBankID: BAF49741.1) and its putative orthologs At-NOL (AT5G04900) and Cr-NOL (Cre14.g608800) were aligned using the Muscle multiple alignment algorithm (Edgar, 2004) via the web service in Jalview software (version 2.8) (Waterhouse et al., 2009), which was also used for major editing. The sequences are ordered according to their MuscleWS similarity. Residues conserved in either 5 or 6 of the proteins are highlighted with a dark blue background, residues conserved in 3 or 4 of the proteins with a light blue background. Regions with high similarity to short-chain dehydrogenases identified using CDsearch (Marchler-Bauer and Bryant, 2004) are indicated with a black box, important sequence motifs conserved in short chain dehydrogenases are denoted in white bold letters (n = any amino acid, h = hydrophobic amino acid, p = polar or charged amino acid). The two positions indicative for the cofactor that is bound are denoted in black bold letters above the, NADPH is most likely the cofactor when both positions are either lysine or arginine (K/R) (Tanaka et al., 1996). Adobe Illustrator was used for the final editing.

Supplemental Figure 9: Alignment of chlorophyll b reductasesOsNOLATNOLCrNOLCrNYC1AtNYC1OsNYC1

111111

253244367782

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M A A T A A Y L P L R AQ AQ VG L A P L R P SG- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M A TWSG FN V S S S P L L R L R S S S V SN V T K L P F L S- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MM L SQR SG V A A K AH A S T AR A I N PN A V A S L A A S AR GG P A S T S S FGM P V T A V - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R K PD TD N C G P S T SG S S KR - - - - - - - - - G F I N E L L R G PQ P - - - - -- - M T T L T K I Q V Y PQ V L EH R L F FR D P I R VG SR L T C R - - - - - - - - - - ER SN R V Y VH R C E K K V ER KR K V E K F KGN G SWD S L K SG F L G F S K L GM A A A A V VH L S VH GR L R R S P E L H AR P YH R P S L L R C R A F KQ E AD N GG E E A S S S P P P P T T A E AR R R R K - - - - - - - G P L Y K L K A A I QG L AG SR

OsNOLATNOLCrNOLCrNYC1AtNYC1OsNYC1

263345377883

7379112116161170

S A A AG - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AR L PGR - - - - - - - - - - - - T AR R R L A AR GG - - - - - - - - P E A AG I R A E A V PGG - GG V AR R A AM V P PP I C R R - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R L L A ER FG L - - - - - A T V V V TR QN L T V T P S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S A A V E A - R I SG KR E PM T P PA AG L A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R A S P AR R G L AQGG S A A AR R AR R S V T V TR A A TQQ T E K P T A A AN G T P A T A T N G - N GGG K A V A PQ A P- - - - - - - - - D L F K AH P K VR Q I N H I L R GR H D R L R G L ER P L G A V V L P A Y L WG S I A A V I G L Q S A L P V L SG A A VGG L F A VMH R VC N R K L WA A PF L S KD - - - - E YN Q K V EN L EM V F S S V A VQ I AR Y I V TM T S T G A I L L I G FQ L SGGD S SMN S L VWY SWL GG I I I G TM T G A - N M V L ED H YR AG PS A A A E A YGG E YQR A V E K A E E I F F S V A TQ VGR Y V I TMM S SG V V L G VG FQ L SGGD SQMN T L I WY SWL GG V I I G TM I G A - N S V L E EH C K AG P

OsNOLAtNOLCrNOLCrNYC1AtNYC1OsNYC1

7480

113117162171

144149183195247256

YN - - - V L I TG S T KG I G Y A L A K E F L K AGD N V V I C SR S A ER V E S A V TD L K K E FG E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - QH VWG I VC D VR EG KD V K A L VDYN - - - I L I TG S T KG I G Y A L AR E F L K AGD N V V I C SR S A ER V E T A VQ S L K E E FG - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EH VWG T KC D V T EG KD VR E L V AYN - - - V V I TG S T KG I GR A L A ED F L R AGD R V V VC SR TGD R V S E T V A E L A AQ YG A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - D R V KG L A VD V S A PGQ AR Q L ADR Q P L T V V V TGG SR G L G K A L AR E F L A AGD R V L L T SR TQ A A AD A A VR E L R E E V A A L N GC C - - - - - - - - - - PQ V VG V A AD V SD A VG V A A V E AR N - - - V V I TG S TR G L G K A L AR E F L L SGD R V I V T SR S S E S VD M T V K E L EQN L K E I M SN A S E S AR K K L SD A K V VG I AC D VC K P ED V E K L SNR N - - - V V I TG S TR G L G K A L AR E F L L SGD R V V I A SR S P E S V L Q T I N E L E EN I Q EG L S V A K K KQR E I L L H A K V VG T SC D VC K P ED V K K L VN

OsNOLATNOLCrNOLCrNYC1AtNYC1OsNYC1

145150184196248257

233238272283335344

F AR D KM K Y I D I W I N N AG SN A Y S Y K P L V E T SD E A L M E V I T TN T L G L M I C C R E A I N MMR N Q PR GGH I FN I D G AG SD GR P T PR F A A YG A T KRY SQ KN L K Y I D I W I N N AG SN A Y S F K P L A E A SD ED L I E V V K TN T L G L M L C C R E AMN MM L T Q SR GGH I FN I D G AG SD GR P T PR F A A YG A T KRF A AQ E L GR VD I W I N N AG T N A YR YG PM A E S TD E E L SQ I VG TN V L G VM L C C K E A I R VMR SQ S TH GH I FN MD G AG AD GN A T PR F A A YG A T KRA A L S S FGR VD AWVN N AG Y SG - S FQ P L V EQ TD AQ I EQ V VR TN L L G T L L C TR Q A V S L MQH Q PGGGH I FN MD G AG AD G F A T PN Y A A YG A T K AF A V K E L G S I N I W I N N AG T N K - G FR P L L E F T E ED I TQ I V S TN L I G S I L C TR G AMD VM SR QH SGGH I FN MD G AG SGG S S T P L T A V YG S T KCF A KD E L G S I D I W I N N AG T N K - G FR P L VN F SD ED I SQ I V S TN L VG S L L C TR E AMN VMQH QQ KGGH V FN MD G AG SGG S S T P L T A V YG S T KC

OsNOLATNOLCrNOLCrNYC1AtNYC1OsNYC1

234239273284336345

316321361361410419

S V VH L T K S L Q A E L QMN E VN N VM VH N L S PGM V T T D L L M SG A T T KQ A K F F I N I L A E P AN V V AD Y L V PN I R A I P T - - - - - - N Q SM K P T Y I R FS V VH L T K S L Q A E L QMQD V KN V V VH N L S PGM V T T D L L M SG A T T KQ A K F F I N V L A E P A E V V A E Y L V PN I R A I P A - - - - - - SG SM K P T Y I R FS L AQ L G K S L S A E L GM L G I KN V A VH N L S PGM V T T E L L M AG AN T P T A K F F I N C L A E P A AD V A S F L V PR I R A V P A T A A S P L TG A L Q P V Y I R FG I TQ L TG T L QR E L AD T P I K - - - L H T V S PGM I L TD L L L EG A T T AN KQ A F - N I L C EH P E T V A A F L V PR I K S A V A - - - - - - - R D V SG T Y TR FG L R Q FH G S I V K E SQ K TN VG - - - L H T A S PGM V L T E L L L SG S S I KN KQM F - N I I C E L P E T V AR T L V PR MR V V KG - - - - - - - - - - SG K A VN YG L R Q FQ A S L L K E SR R S K VG - - - VH T A S PGM V L TD L L L SG S S L R N KQM F - N L I C E L P E T V AR T L V PR MR V V KG - - - - - - - - - - SG K A I N Y

OsNOLATNOLCrNOLCrNYC1AtNYC1OsNYC1

317322362362411420

343348387443495503

L TG L K A Y SR I F SR I A FG AR R N K Y V A ED - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -L TG I K A Y T K I F SR V A L G AR KN R Y V T E E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -L TQG K A L QR V A AR L L TG SR K SR Y V E E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -L T PG S A L YR L A T A P A - - - R L GR F F D K EGR A V Y P P ER ER L MGR H A K S T AR - - - AQ A A AR R Q SG S L A L A YN L S V L AG V V V L - L A E AQ V L H HL T P PR I L L A I V T SWL - - - R R GR WF D D QGR A L Y A A E AD R L R N - WA EN R T R L S L TD AM EM Y T EN TWV S V F S L S V VC A F I I L Q S T T P S S F PGL T P PR I L L A L V T AWV - - - R R GR WFD E EGR A V Y A A E AD R I R N - WA E SR AR F S F TD AM EM Y T EN TWV S V F S L S V VC A F I I L - S S SGG P L PG

G G GT n n n h

Y n AS STK

D h n p

G n hD h h hNNAG N h n Gh

KR

KR

TP n n nGnhNS nh

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 14: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 10: mRNA abundance of enzymes involved in heme biosynthesis and degradationRelative mRNA abundance (% max) of enzymes from heme metabolism in Chlamydomonas strain CC4349, CC4348 (sta6) and CC4532 (48 h experiment), see legends for individual gene names. mRNA was analyzed similar to what was described in Supplemental Figure 5. mRNA abundance of enzymes involved in heme and siroheme biosynthesis (A) and enzymes involved in heme degradation (B).

Supplemental Figure 10: Heme biosynthesis and breakdown

A RNA abundance of enzymes involved in heme and siroheme biosynthesis

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)UPM1HEM15 (FeC)

SIRB

B RNA abundance of enzymes involved in heme breakdown

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)HMOX2HMOX1

PCYA

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 15: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 11: Abundance of ribosomal proteins and corresponding mRNAsPicture composed as described in Supplemental Figure 5 (see legends for individual gene/protein names). Average protein abundances of cytosolic/plastidic complexes are drawn similar to Figure 6 in the main body to allow for comparison. mRNA and protein abundances of chloroplast ribosomal proteins from the large 50S subunit (A) and small 30S subunit (B) as well as cytosolic ribosomal proteins from the large 60S subunit (C) and small 40S subunit (D). For mitochondrial ribosomal proteins mRNA abundance of the large 50S subunit (E) and small 30S subunit (F) is summarized.

Supplemental Figure 11: Ribosomes - chloroplast

B chloroplast ribosomes: small subunit (30S)

PRPS17PRPS13PRPS6PRPS1 PSRP3PSRP6

PRPS16PRPS1PRPS17 PRPS20

PRPS5PRPS21PRPS6

PRPS10PSRP1

PRPS13PSRP3

PRPS15PSRP4

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.8

-1.2

-0.6

0.0

0.6

1.2

1.8

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4532CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) protein (CC4532)overlay (CC4532)

A chloroplast ribosomes: large subunit (50S)

PRPL28 PRPL6 PRPL7/L12PRPL34PRPL35

PRPL15PRPL17PRPL18PRPL19

PRPL21PRPL24PRPL27PRPL28 PRPL33

PRPL29PRPL31PRPL32

PRPL1PRPL4PRPL6PRPL7/L12

PRPL10PRPL11PRPL13

PRPL9

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.8

-1.2

-0.6

0.0

0.6

1.2

1.8

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4532CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) protein (CC4532)overlay (CC4532)

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 16: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 11: Ribosomes - cytosol

C cytosolic ribosomes: large subunit (60S)

RPL26RPL27RPL30RPL34RPL35RPL36

RPL38

RPL14RPL18RPL19RPL22RPL23RPL24

RPP0RPP1RPL3RPL4RPL6RPL7

RPL11RPL12RPL13RPL13a

RPL10aRPL9RPL27

RPL27ARPL28RPL29RPL30RPL31

RPL10RPL10ARPL11RPL12RPL13RPL13A

RPL14RPL15RPL17RPL18RPL18ARPL19

RPL22RPL23RPL23ARPL24RPL26

RPL21RPP0RPP1RPP2RPL3RPL4RPL5

RPL6RPL7RPL7ARPL7AE

RPL9RPL8

RPL32RPL34RPL35RPL35ARPL36RPL36A

RPL37RPL37ARPL38RPL40

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.8

-1.2

-0.6

0.0

0.6

1.2

1.8

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4532CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) protein (CC4532)overlay (CC4532)

D cytosolic ribosomes: small subunit (40S)

RPS15RPS16RPS18RPS19RPS24RPS25

RPS3RPS3aRPS4RPS5RPS6RPS7

RPS10RPS11RPS13RPS14

RPS8RPS9

RPS26RPS27eRPS28RPSa

RPS27E1RPS27E2RPS28RPS29RPS30

RPS25RPS26RPS27A

RPS23RPS24

RPS11RPS13RPS14RPS15RPS16 RPS21

RPS17RPS18RPS19RPS20

RPS2RPS3RPS3ARPS4RPS5 RPS10

RPS6RPS7RPS8RPS9

RPSA

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.8

-1.2

-0.6

0.0

0.6

1.2

1.8

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4532CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) protein (CC4532)overlay (CC4532)

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 17: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 11: Ribosomes - mitochondria

E mitochondrial ribosomes: large subunit (50S)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) MRPL20MRPL21MRPL22MRPL23MRPL30MRPL36MRPL43MRPL45MRPL46MRPL47MRPL54

MRPL1

MRPL11MRPL13MRPL14MRPL15MRPL16MRPL17MRPL19

MRPL2MRPL3MRPL4MRPL7/L12

MRPS14MRPS15MRPS17MRPS18MRPS19MRPS29MRPS34

MRPS11MRPS12MRPS13

MRPS2MRPS6MRPS7MRPS9

F mitochondrial ribosomes: small subunit (30S)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 18: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Aplastidcytosol

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

eSupplemental Figure 12: N Sparing

E

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1sulfur atoms in side chains

perc

entil

es

up regulatedtotal proteomedown regulated

F

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5carbon atoms in side chains

perc

entil

es

up regulatedtotal proteomedown regulated

N a

tom

s / s

idec

hain

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.6

D

prot

eom

e

50S

(mt)

30S

(mt)

50S

(cp)

30S

(cp)

60S

(cyt

)

40S

(cyt

)

10-10 0log2 FC

B

0 12 24 48 0 12 24 480

6

8

10

2

4

Nitr

ogen

(pg

cell-1

)

time in +N/–N (h)

C

0

30

40

50

10

20

Car

bon

(pg

cell-1

)

0 12 24 48 0 12 24 48time in +N/–N (h)

***

**

Ala

Asp Gln

Phe Gly

His Ile Lys

Leu

Met

Pro

Arg

Ser Thr

Val

Tyr

Cys

AsnGlu

Trp

G

prec

ent o

f tot

al

0

8

12

16

20

4

updown

Supplemental Figure 12: Nitrogen sparing mechanisms in ChlamydomonasA: Overlay of cytosolic and chloroplast ribosomal average protein abundance: Relative protein abundance compared to a 15N labeled standard (14N/15N ratio) for each measured protein was averaged for cytosolic ribosomal proteins (blue) and chloroplast ribosomal proteins (green). Error bars indicate standard deviation between individual proteins.B: Total nitrogen content: Nitrogen content (pg/cell) at the indicated time points after transfer to N-free medium measured on a TOC/TN analyzer. Error bars indicate standard deviation of three independent biological replicates.

C: Total non-purgeable organic carbon content: Carbon content (pg/cell) at the indicated time points measured on a TOC/TN analyzer. Error bars indicate standard deviation of three independent biological replicates.D: Nitrogen content of ribosomal proteins: Range (10% quantile (Q10) to 90% quantile (Q90)) of average number of nitrogen atoms in amino acid side chains in the proteome and in ribosomal proteins from different compartments. Color indicates (average) log2 fold change of mRNA abundance (green increase, red decrease) within 48 h of nitrogen deprivation in Chlamydomonas strain CC4532. Nitrogen content in side chains is based on Augustus 10.2 gene models.E: Comparison of sulfur content between up and down-regulated proteins: Quantile distributions of sulfur atoms in amino acid side chains of up (green) or down-regulated (red) proteins. The whole proteome based on Augustus 10.2 gene models was used for reference (grey).F: Comparison of carbon content between up and down-regulated proteins: Picture composed as described in E for distributions of carbon atoms in amino acid side chains.G: Amino acid composition in increasing and decreasing proteins within the proteome: The distributions of the individual amino acids within the proteomics data set is shown, divided into accumulating (up, green) or decreasing (down) proteins upon N starvation. In each data series the total count is normalized to 1. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (t-test, p-value < 0.05) in the differences between the set of accumulating proteins or decreasing proteins (at 48 h time point).

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 19: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 13: Abundance of autophagy-related genesA: mRNA abundance of genes involved in autophagy: Relative mRNA abundance (% max) for proteins involved in autophagy in Chlamydomonas strain CC4349, CC4348 (sta6) and CC4532 (48 h time course). mRNA was analyzed similar to what was already described in Supplemental Figure 5. See legend for individual gene names. The gene list derived from (Díaz-Troya et al., 2008).B: Average mRNA abundance of genes involved in autophagy: mRNA from genes in A was averaged, error bars indicate standard deviation between individual genes.

Supplemental Figure 13: Autophagy

A RNA abundance of proteins involved in autophagy

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) TORLST8HOR1HOR2APG1APG3APG4APG5

APG6APG7APG8APG12APG18APG20APG23

B average RNA abundance of proteins involved in autophagy

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) Average mRNA

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 20: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 14: mRNA abundance of transporters involved in ammonium importRelative mRNA abundance (% max) of NH4

+ transporters from the AMT family in Chlamydomonas strain CC4349, CC4348 (sta6) and CC4532 (48 h experiment), see legends for individual gene names. mRNA was analyzed similar to what was described in Supplemental Figure 5. mRNA abundance of AMT transporters present in N-replete (A) and absent or very low expressed in N-replete (B).

Supplemental Figure 14

A AMT familiy transporters expressed in N-replete

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A ab

unda

nce CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

B AMT familiy transporters low or not expressed in N-replete

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A ab

unda

nce CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

AMT3AMT6AMT7

AMT1AMT4AMT5AMT8

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 21: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

D

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

time in –N (h)0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

mR

NA

abu

ndan

ce

GLN2 (GS2)

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

Supplemental Figure 15

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

C protein abundance of GS

GS1 GS2

B chloroplast GS

GLN2 GLN3

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8time in –N (h)

A Expression of GLN genes encoding for chloroplast GS

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) GLN2GLN3

E cytosolic GS

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

time in –N (h)0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

GLN1 GLN4

F Expression of GLN genes encoding for cytosolic GS

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) GLN1GLN4

Supplemental Figure 15: Abundance of glutamine synthases (GS) and GLN RNAsA and B: Relative abundance of GLN RNAs encoding plastidic GS enzymes: Relative abundance (% max) of GLN2 and GLN3 upon transfer to N-free media (A, 48 h) in Chlamydomonas strain CC4349, CC4348 (sta6) and CC4532 (all experiments) and within the first 8 h of N deprivation in Chlamydomonas strain CC4532 (B, 1 h and 8 h experiment). mRNA was analyzed similar to what was already described in Supplemental Figure 5. C: Abundance of cytosolic and chloroplast GS: Relative protein abundances compared to a 15N labeled standard (14N/15N ratio) for GS as described in Supplemental Figure 5. Error bars indicate standard deviation between individual experiements.D: Overlay of protein and mRNA abundance of GS2 (GLN2): The relative abundance of GLN2 mRNA (% max) within the 48 h N deprivation experiment (L) in Chlamydomonas strain CC4532 is displayed in grey. The relative abundance (14N/15N, log2 transformed) for the GS2 protein is given in red.E and F: Relative abundance of GLN RNAs encoding cytosolic GS enzymes: Relative abundance (% max) of GLN1 and GLN4 upon transfer to N-free media (E, 48 h) in Chlamydomonas strain CC4349, CC4348 (sta6) and CC4532 (all experiments) and within the first 8 h of N deprivation in Chlamydomonas strain CC4532 (F, 1 h and 8 h experiment). mRNA was analyzed similar to what was already described in Supplemental Figure 5.

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 22: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 16: Abundance of glutamate oxoglutarate amidotransferases (GOGAT) and corresponding mRNAsPicture composed as described in Supplemental Figure 5 (see legends for individual gene/protein names).

Supplemental Figure 16: RNA and protein abundance of GOGAT enzymes

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4532CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) protein (CC4532)overlay (CC4532)

rela

tive

prot

ein

abun

danc

e

rela

tive

RN

A a

bund

ance

GSN1 GSF1 GSN1 GSF1

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 23: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 17: Abundance of RNAs encoding nitrate or nitrite metabolism functionsmRNA abundance (RPKM) of proteins involved in NO3/NO2 assimilation in Chlamydomonas strain CC4349, CC4348 (sta6) and CC4532 (all experiments), see legends for individual gene names. mRNA was analyzed similar to what was described in Supplemental Figure 5. mRNA abundance of nitrate (NR) and nitrite reductase (NiR) (A), nitrate transporters of the NRT1 family (B), nitrate/nitrite transporters of the NRT2 family (C) and nitrite transporters from the NAR1 family (D) upon transfer to N-free media.

Supplemental Figure 17

A Nitrate and nitrtite reductase

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0

50

100

150

200

250

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

) CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

B Nitrate transporter of the NRT1 family

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0

10

20

30

40

50

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

) CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

C Nitrate/nitrite transporter of the NRT2 family

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0

20

40

60

80

100

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

) CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

NIA1/NIT1NII1

NRT1.1

NRT2.1NRT2.2NRT2.3NRT2.4NRT2.5NRT2.6NAR2

NAR1.1NAR1.2NAR1.3NAR1.4NAR1.5NAR1.6

D Nitrate/nitrite transporter of the NAR1 family

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0

100

200

300

400

500

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

) CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 24: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Figure 18

A Transcriptional regulators

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0

5

10

15

20

25

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

) CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) NIT2NRR1

C Potential regulators

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0

15

30

45

60

75

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

) CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) Cre01.g011150Cre04.g216200Cre16.g673250

B GLB1, encoding the PII protein

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0

50

100

150

200

250

RN

A a

bund

ance

(RP

KM

) CC4532

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48time in –N (h)

CC4349 CC4348 (sta6) GLB1 (PII)

0

0.1

0.4

0.3

0.2

NR

R1

Cre

01.g

0111

50C

re04

.g21

6200

Cre

16.g

6732

50

prot

eom

e

nitro

gen

atom

/ si

dech

ain 0.5

Per

ez-R

odrig

uez

et a

l.Zh

ang

et a

l.N

IT2

10-10 0log2 FC

OnOff

DSupplemental Figure 18: Abundance of RNAs encoding (potential) regulators of N assimilationmRNA abundance (RPKM) of proteins (potentially) regulating N assimilation in Chlamydomonas strain CC4349, CC4348 (sta6) and CC4532 (48 h experiment), see legends for individual gene names. mRNA was analyzed similar to what was described in Supplemental Figure 5. mRNA abundance of NIT2 and NRR1 (A), the GLB1 gene encoding the PII protein (B) and three co-regulated transcription factors from Cluster 25 (C) upon transfer to N-free media. N content within side chains is provided for the characterized and potential transcriptional regulators (D). Range (from the 10 % to 90 % quantile) of average number of nitrogen atoms in amino acid side chains in all proteins of the proteome and in all transcription factors as proposed from either Perez-Rodriguez et al. 2010 or Zhang et al. 2011. The color indicates (average) log2 fold changes of mRNA abundance (green - increase, red - decrease) between N-replete conditions and 60 min after the transfer to N-free medium in Chlamydomonas strain CC4532. The nitrogen content in side chains is based on Augustus 10.2 gene models.

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 25: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Table 1: Overlap of differentially accumulating mRNAs between all and individual strains

Comparison of all three strains Chlamydomonas strain

CC4532 CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

total DE1 genes (No.) 4288 8482 8200 unique (No.) 579 1434 1221 unique (%) 0.135 0.169 0.149

conserved in all strains (No.) 2914 2914 2914 conserved in all strains (%) 0.680 0.344 0.355

add. overlap only with CC4349 (No.) 432 - 3702 add. overlap only with CC4349 (%) 0.101 - 0.451

add. overlap only with CC4348 (sta6) (No.) 363 3702 - add. overlap only with CC4348 (sta6) (%) 0.085 0.436 -

add. overlap only with CC4532 (No.) - 432 363

add. overlap only with CC4532 (%) - 0.051 0.044

Pairwise comparison Chlamydomonas strain

CC4532 CC4349 CC4348 (sta6)

CC4532 (No.) 4288 3346 3277 CC4532 (%) 1 0.394 0.400

CC4349 (No.) 3346 8482 6616 CC4349 (%) 0.780 1 0.807

CC4348 (sta6) (No.) 3277 6616 8200 CC4348 (sta6) (%) 0.764 0.780 1

1 differentially expressed according to statistical analysis summarized in Materials and Methods

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 26: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Table 2: Common patterns of changing mRNA abundances in nitrogen, sulfur and phosphorus deprivation

Comparison No. of genes similar in CC4532 at each time point in N-free media (h)

0.03 0.07 0.13 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.75 1 2 4 8 12 24 48

-S/-N

up/up 42 52 62 78 99 114 133 165 168 153 167 173 162 167 157 down/down 23 48 45 116 187 239 262 280 266 301 285 322 279 279 281

ratio (up/down) 1.83 1.08 1.38 0.67 0.53 0.48 0.51 0.59 0.63 0.51 0.59 0.54 0.58 0.60 0.56 up/down 9 20 15 14 18 17 16 10 12 8 5 7 5 6 6 down/up 5 7 9 10 14 17 18 15 14 15 97 64 25 7 3 similar 65 100 107 194 286 353 395 445 434 454 452 495 441 446 438

opposite 14 27 24 24 32 34 34 25 26 23 102 71 30 13 9 ratio (similar/opposite) 4.64 3.70 4.46 8.08 8.94 10.38 11.62 17.80 16.69 19.74 4.43 6.97 14.70 34.31 48.67

-P/-N

up/up 21 25 30 37 46 53 57 68 70 72 77 82 81 78 72 down/down 0 0 0 2 13 21 28 39 38 41 39 45 41 39 40

ratio (up/down) N/A N/A N/A 18.50 3.54 2.52 2.04 1.74 1.84 1.76 1.97 1.82 1.98 2.00 1.80 up/down 10 10 8 11 14 15 16 14 11 8 2 7 3 5 6 down/up 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 similar 21 25 30 39 59 74 85 107 108 113 116 127 122 117 112

opposite 12 12 9 12 15 15 16 14 11 8 3 7 3 6 6 ratio (similar/opposite) 1.75 2.08 3.33 3.25 3.93 4.93 5.31 7.64 9.82 14.13 38.67 18.14 40.67 19.50 18.67

-S/-P/-N

up/up/up 12 12 14 18 25 30 30 36 39 39 41 40 40 41 40 down/down/down 0 0 0 2 10 17 24 33 34 38 38 42 40 38 40

ratio (up/down) N/A N/A N/A 9.00 2.50 1.76 1.25 1.09 1.15 1.03 1.08 0.95 1.00 1.08 1.00 up/up/down 1 3 0 0 3 4 4 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 0 up/down/up 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 down/up/up 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 3 2 1 1

down/down/up 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 down/up/down 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 up/down/down 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

similar 12 12 14 20 35 47 54 69 73 77 79 82 80 79 80 opposite 3 6 3 2 6 8 8 6 4 5 5 5 3 3 3

ratio (similar/opposite) 4.00 2.00 4.67 10.00 5.83 5.88 6.75 11.50 18.25 15.40 15.80 16.40 26.67 26.33 26.67

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 27: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Table 2 - continued

Comparison No. of genes similar in CC4349 at each time point in N-free media (h)

0.5 2 4 8 12 24 48

-S/-N

up/up 124 150 157 163 158 159 159 down/down 156 277 218 176 121 119 142

ratio (up/down) 0.79 0.54 0.72 0.93 1.31 1.34 1.12 up/down 37 35 30 22 15 20 20 down/up 91 90 92 89 80 74 72 similar 280 427 375 339 279 278 301

opposite 128 125 122 111 95 94 92 ratio (similar/opposite) 2.19 3.42 3.07 3.05 2.94 2.96 3.27

-P/-N

up/up 66 79 84 88 88 87 85 down/down 32 44 43 39 26 21 20

ratio (up/down) 2.06 1.80 1.95 2.26 3.38 4.14 4.25 up/down 12 14 10 6 5 8 6 down/up 3 1 1 2 3 4 3 similar 98 123 127 127 114 108 105

opposite 15 15 11 8 8 12 9 ratio (similar/opposite) 6.53 8.20 11.55 15.88 14.25 9.00 11.67

-S/-P/-N

up/up/up 36 43 43 44 44 44 44 down/down/down 26 39 38 34 21 16 15

ratio (up/down) 1.38 1.10 1.13 1.29 2.10 2.75 2.93 up/up/down 3 3 2 0 0 1 0 up/down/up 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 down/up/up 3 4 4 4 4 4 4

down/down/up 3 1 1 2 3 4 3 down/up/down 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 up/down/down 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

similar 62 82 81 78 65 60 59 opposite 9 8 7 6 7 9 7

ratio (similar/opposite) 6.89 10.25 11.57 13.00 9.29 6.67 8.43

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523

Page 28: Supplemental Figure 1: Comparison of mRNA expression ......replicates and plotted on logarithmic scales on y and x axis, respectively. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (ρ)

Supplemental Table 2 - continued

Comparison No. of genes similar in CC4348 (sta6) at each time point in N-free media (h)

0.5 2 4 8 12 24 48

-S/-N

up/up 84 152 162 161 162 161 167 down/down 108 275 225 219 229 179 219

ratio (up/down) 0.78 0.55 0.72 0.74 0.71 0.9 0.76 up/down 32 27 20 23 24 25 20 down/up 29 49 57 66 48 46 45 similar 192 427 387 380 391 340 386

opposite 61 76 77 89 72 71 65 ratio (similar/opposite) 3.15 5.62 5.03 4.27 5.43 4.79 5.94

-P/-N

up/up 39 79 83 82 84 90 92 down/down 16 43 41 39 40 34 38

ratio (up/down) 2.44 1.84 2.02 2.1 2.1 2.65 2.42 up/down 18 13 9 8 7 5 6 down/up 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 similar 55 122 124 121 124 124 130

opposite 19 14 10 9 8 7 8 ratio (similar/opposite) 2.89 8.71 12.40 13.44 15.50 17.71 16.25

-S/-P/-N

up/up/up 21 44 43 43 43 46 46 down/down/down 13 37 36 34 35 30 34

ratio (up/down) 1.62 1.19 1.19 1.26 1.23 1.53 1.35 up/up/down 6 1 1 1 1 0 0 up/down/up 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 down/up/up 2 4 4 3 3 4 4

down/down/up 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 down/up/down 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 up/down/down 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

similar 34 81 79 77 78 76 80 opposite 9 6 6 5 5 6 6

ratio (similar/opposite) 3.78 13.50 13.17 15.40 15.60 12.67 13.33

Supplemental Data. Schmollinger et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.122523


Recommended