www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/science.aam5655/DC1
Supplementary Materials for
Perovskite solar cells with CuSCN hole extraction layers yield stabilized
efficiencies greater than 20%
Neha Arora, M. Ibrahim Dar,* Alexander Hinderhofer, Norman Pellet, Frank Schreiber, Shaik Mohammed Zakeeruddin, Michael Grätzel*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (M.I.D.); [email protected] (M.G.)
Published 28 September 2017 on Science First Release DOI: 10.1126/science.aam5655
This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S11
Table S1
References
S2
Materials and Methods
All materials were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and were used as received unless
stated otherwise.
Preparation of TiO2 photoanode
Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)-glass substrates (transparent conducting oxide
(TCO) glass, NSG 10, Nippon sheet glass, Japan) were cleaned by ultrasonication in
Hellmanex (2%, deionized water) for 30 min, rinsed thoroughly with de-ionized water
and ethanol, and then treated in oxygen plasma for 15 min. A compact layer of TiO2 of ca
30 nm was subsequently deposited via spray pyrolysis at 450 °C from a precursor
solution of commercial titanium diisopropoxide bis(acetylacetonate) (75% in 2-propanol,
Sigma-Aldrich) diluted in anhydrous ethanol (1:9, volume ratio) and oxygen as a carrier
gas. A mesoporous TiO2 layer was then deposited by spin coating a diluted paste at a spin
speed of 4000 rpm, acceleration 2000 rpm for 20 s (the weight ratio of TiO2 (Dyesol
paste, 30NRD) and ethanol is 1:6), onto the substrate containing TiO2 compact layer.
This was followed by sintering the substrates at 450 °C for 30 min in dry air flow. For Li
treatment of the mesoporous TiO2 scaffold, 150 µL of LiTFSI
(bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide lithium salt) solution in acetonitrile (10mg/mL, freshly
prepared in argon atmosphere) was spin coated (3000 rpm, acceleration 2000 rpm for 20
s) after a loading time of 10 s. Thereafter, Li-treated substrates were subjected to a
second sintering step at 450 °C for 30 min in dry air. The substrates were transferred in a
dry air glove box (humidity< 1%) after cooling down to 200 °C for perovskite deposition.
Preparation of perovskite
The perovskite films were deposited using single-step deposition method from the
precursor solution containing FAI (1.0 M) (Dyesol), PbI2 (1.1 M) (TCI), MABr (0.2 M)
(Dyesol) and PbBr2 (0.2 M) (TCI) in anhydrous dimethylformamide (99.8%, Acros) /
dimethylsulphoxide (99.7%, Acros) (4:1 (v:v)). Thereafter, CsI (abcr, GmbH, ultra dry;
99.998%), (5% volume, 1.5 M DMSO) was added to the precursor solution (33). The
precursor solution was spin-coated onto the mesoporous TiO2 films in a two-step
programme at 1000 and 6000 r.p.m. for 10 and 30 s, respectively. During the second step,
100 μl of chlorobenzene (99.8%, Acros) was dropped on the spinning substrate 10 s prior
to the end of the programme. This was followed by annealing the films at 100 °C for 45
min. The perovskite deposition was carried out in a dry air glove box under controlled
atmospheric conditions with humidity <1%.
Deposition of hole transporting layer
To complete the fabrication of devices, 2,2’,7,7’-tetrakis(N,N-di-p-
methoxyphenylamine)-9,9-spirobifluorene (spiro-OMeTAD, 70 mM in chlorobenzene) as
a hole-transporting material (HTM) was deposited by spin coating 40 μL of the prepared
solution at 4000 rpm for 30 s. The spiro-OMeTAD (Merck) was doped with
bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide lithium salt, tris(2-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-4-tert-
butylpyridine)- cobalt(III) tris(bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide) (FK 209, from
Dyenamo) and 4-tert-Butylpyridine (96%, Sigma-Aldrich) in a molar ratio of 0.5, 0.03
and 3.3, respectively.
CuSCN solution was prepared by dissolving 35 mg CuSCN salt (99%, Sigma-
Aldrich) in 1 mL of diethyl sulfide (98%, Sigma-Aldrich) after constant stirring at room
S3
temperature for 30 min. To deposit a thin and uniform film of CuSCN, 35 μL of a
CuSCN solution were drop casted within 2-3 seconds on the substrate containing
perovskite film spinning at 5000 rpm, and the substrate was allowed to spin for 30
seconds. Like in case of spiro-OMeTAD deposition, no post heat treatment was applied.
The deposition of hole transporting layer was carried out in a dry air glove box with
humidity <1%. Finally, device fabrication was completed by thermally evaporating
~60 nm of gold layer as a back contact.
Deposition of Al2O3 spacer layer.
Al2O3 was deposited from trimethylaluminium (Al(CH3)3) (Sigma Aldrich) and
deionized H2O using Savannah ALD system from Cambridge Nanotech, USA. The
precursors were pulsed into the reactor using N2 (99.999%) as an inert carrier gas. The
water was pulsed for 0.015 s and confined in the reactor for 60 s followed by purging of
TMA for 0.015 s, and wait another 60 s. 20 ALD cycles were applied to achieve the
thickness of ~2 nm.
Deposition of rGO spacer layer.
A thin layer (~10 nm thickness) of reduced graphene oxide (Ossila (flake size 0.1-1 μm,
flake thickness <1nm, purity>99%)) was deposited by spin coating the solution (filtered)
containing reduced graphene oxide (1 mg/mL in chlorobenzene, sonicated for 30 min) at
3000 rpm onto the CuSCN layer.
Structural characterization
X-ray scattering experiments were done at beamline ID10 EH1 of the ESRF with a
photon energy of 22 keV under nitrogen atmosphere. The beam size was 10 µm in
vertical direction and 120 µm in horizontal direction. GIXD data was measured under an
angle of incidence of 0.08° with a point detector. GIWAXS data was measured with a
PILATUS 300k area detector under the same angle of incidence. Calculation of powder
diffraction data was done with mercury (34).
Morphological characterization
A field-emission scanning electron microscope (Merlin) was used to examine the
morphology of the perovskite films and the thickness of various layers. An electron beam
accelerated to 3 kV was used with an in-lens detector.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on an X-ray
photoelectron spectrometer (ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC INC., USA)
with Al Kα radiation (hν = 1486.6 eV) as the source.
Charge extraction by linearly increasing voltage
Fully assembled devices were connected to a function generator and measured with
an oscilloscope across a small load resistance to minimize the RC effects of the circuit.
The mobilities were measured across a range of electric fields, which are determined by
the field at the time where the maximum current is extracted.
S4
Photoluminescence studies
Photoluminescence and time-resolved photoluminescence spectra were recorded on
a spectrofluorometer Fluorolog 322. Photoluminescence spectra were recorded by
exciting the samples with 450 W Xenon lamp at a fixed wavelength of 450 nm
and scanning the emission monochromator from 625 to 850 nm. The same spectrometer
working in a time-correlated single-photon counting mode was used for the
measurements of photoluminescence decay kinetics with sub-nanosecond time resolution.
Picosecond pulsed diode laser head NanoLED-405LH (Horiba) emitting <200 ps duration
pulses at 408 nm with repetition rate of 1 MHz was used as an excitation source. For
electron injection study, the samples were excited from the TiO2 side while as to study
the photoluminescence decay kinetics in pristine and HTM containing samples, the
samples were excited from the top.
Photovoltaic studies
The current-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the perovskite devices were recorded
with a digital source meter (Keithley model 2400, USA). A 450 W xenon lamp (Oriel,
USA) was used as the light source for photovoltaic (J-V) measurements. The light source
was equipped with a Schott K113 Tempax sunlight filter (Praezisions Glas and Optik
GmbH) to match the emission spectrum of the lamp to the AM1.5G standard. Before
each measurement, the exact light intensity was determined using a calibrated Si
reference diode equipped with an infrared cutoff filter (KG-3, Schott) The photo-active
area of 0.16 cm2 was defined using a dark-colored metal mask. External quantum
efficiency (EQE) measurements were made using a LED light source (Ariadne EQE from
Cicci Research).
Stability Test
Photo-stability tests were carried out at a maximum power point under one-sun
illumination at 60 °C using a home-built electronic board with an eight-channel
maximum power point capability. The channels were equipped with DACs (DAC7563),
level shifters (INA2132), and an output line driver (OPA2192). The driving line had a 12
bit resolution in the ±2.048 V range (1 mV per bit). The buffer output was connected to
the cells through a 0.5 Ohm sense resistor. The voltage drop was amplified (INA188) to
sense the current. The voltage was buffered (OPA2188) to sense the voltage. The signal
lines were multiplexed (CD54HC4051) into a fourth order active Butterworth filter with
its pole set at 500 Hz. Data conversion was performed at 430 SPS by an analog to digital
converter (ADS1118). The DACs and the ADC were interfaced by an Atmega328
microcontroller. The light source consisted of an array of white LEDs was powered by a
constant current and no filters (UV) were used. Equivalent sun intensities were calibrated
using a calibrated Si reference diode equipped with a KG-3 filter. The setup was
calibrated periodically using a Keithley 2602B source-measuring unit. For thermal
stability tests, CuSCN based devices were coated with a thin layer (30 nm) of
poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (20mg/mL in chlorobenzene) atop the gold
layer. Thermal stability tests were performed by ageing the devices at 85 °C in an oven
and the photovoltaic efficiency under AM1.5 simulated sun light was periodically
recorded.
S5
Supplementary Text
The intensity dependence of VOC curves (Fig. 3A, B; insets) were fitted using the
following equation:
𝐄𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝟏: V𝑂𝐶 =𝑛𝑘𝑇
𝑞ln (
𝐽𝑠𝑐
𝐽0)
Fig. S1. Intensity distribution of β-CuSCN. Angular distribution of intensity from the
CuSCN (002) reflection on glass and perovskite after background subtraction. (0° is
parallel to the substrate plane; 90° is perpendicular).
S6
Fig. S2. Morphological characterization of spiro-OMeTAD coated perovskite film
and spiro-OMeTAD based PSC. (A) Top-view SEM micrograph of spiro-OMeTAD
layer deposited onto perovskite film showing the presence of pin holes. (B) Cross section
SEM micrograph displaying the thickness of different layers of the complete device.
Fig. S3. Photovoltaic characterization. (A) J-V characteristics of the best devices
obtained after employing concentration of 15, 25, 35 and 45 mg/mL of CuSCN in diethyl
sulfide recorded at a scan rate of 0.05 V/s (reverse scans). (Inset shows the photovoltaic
parameters extracted from the JV curves). (B) J-V curves of the best CuSCN based
device involving conventional deposition of CuSCN recorded at a scan rate of 0.05V/s.
(Inset shows the photovoltaic parameters extracted from the JV curve).
S7
Fig. S4. The JSC (log scale) as a function of illumination intensity. (A) Light intensity
dependence of JSC in spiro-OMeTAD based device (Black solid squares) red color solid
line: linear fit. (B) Light intensity dependence of JSC in CuSCN based device (Green solid
squares) red color solid line: linear fit.
Fig. S5. Stability test at 85 °C. Thermal stability test of spiro-OMeTAD (sealed device)
and CuSCN (coated with a thin layer of PMMA) based perovskite solar cells aged at 85
°C in air for 1000 h in the dark. The error bars represent the standard deviation of a batch
of four solar cells.
S8
Fig. S6. Photovoltaic characterization of device based on CuSCN/Au. (A) J-V
characteristic of the CuSCN/Au based device recorded at a scan rate of 10 mV/s (reverse
scan, JSC of 23.40 mA cm-2, VOC of 1103 mV, and a FF of 77.2% resulting in a PCE of
20.3%); the inset shows the maximum power point (MPP) tracking for 60 s yielding a
stabilized efficiency of 20.3%. (B) EQE as a function of monochromatic wavelength
recorded for CuSCN/Au based device and the integrated current density obtained from the
EQE spectrum.
Fig. S7. Operational stability of CuSCN based devices with Al2O3 (20 cycles). Photo-
stability examined at a maximum-power-point under continuous full-sun illumination at
60 °C in nitrogen atmosphere.
S9
Fig. S8. Morphological characterization of CuSCN/rGO/Au sample. Cross-sectional
SEM micrograph showing the formation of a thin layer of rGO onto CuSCN layer.
Fig. S9. Operational stability of un-encapsulated spiro-OMeTAD and CuSCN based
device (containing a thin layer of rGO as a spacer layer between CuSCN and gold layers).
Photo-stability examined at a maximum-power-point under continuous full-sun
illumination at 60 °C in nitrogen atmosphere.
S10
Fig. S10. Stability of CuSCN based device under applied potential. The stability tests were
performed by biasing the devices under a constant potential of 0.8 V in the dark and the
photovoltaic efficiency was periodically recorded under AM1.5 simulated sun light.
Fig. S11. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Core shell Au 4f spectra recorded from
freshly deposited gold layer and the gold layer removed from CuSCN based device
illuminated at a maximum-power-point at 60 °C for 50 h.
S11
Table S1. Photovoltaic parameters extracted from the JV curves (Figure 3A, B) of the
best performing spiro-OMeTAD/Au and CuSCN/rGO/Au based devices measured at
reverse and forward scans.
Scan direction Voc
(mV)
Jsc
(mA/cm2)
FF
(%)
PCE
(%)
Spiro/Au Reverse 1137 23.35 77.5 20.8
Forward 1129 23.31 75.5 20.1
CuSCN/rGO/Au Reverse 1112 23.24 78.2 20.4
Forward 1107 23.24 76.9 20.0
References
1. A. Kojima, K. Teshima, Y. Shirai, T. Miyasaka, Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6050–6051 (2009). doi:10.1021/ja809598r Medline
2. W. S. Yang, B.-W. Park, E. H. Jung, N. J. Jeon, Y. C. Kim, D. U. Lee, S. S. Shin, J. Seo, E. K. Kim, J. H. Noh, S. I. Seok, Iodide management in formamidinium-lead-halide-based perovskite layers for efficient solar cells. Science 356, 1376–1379 (2017). doi:10.1126/science.aan2301 Medline
3. H. Tan, A. Jain, O. Voznyy, X. Lan, F. P. García de Arquer, J. Z. Fan, R. Quintero-Bermudez, M. Yuan, B. Zhang, Y. Zhao, F. Fan, P. Li, L. N. Quan, Y. Zhao, Z.-H. Lu, Z. Yang, S. Hoogland, E. H. Sargent, Efficient and stable solution-processed planar perovskite solar cells via contact passivation. Science 355, 722–726 (2017). doi:10.1126/science.aai9081 Medline
4. J. Liu, Y. Wu, C. Qin, X. Yang, T. Yasuda, A. Islam, K. Zhang, W. Peng, W. Chen, L. Han, A dopant-free hole-transporting material for efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2963–2967 (2014). doi:10.1039/C4EE01589D
5. H.-S. Kim, C.-R. Lee, J.-H. Im, K.-B. Lee, T. Moehl, A. Marchioro, S.-J. Moon, R. Humphry-Baker, J.-H. Yum, J. E. Moser, M. Grätzel, N.-G. Park, Lead iodide perovskite sensitized all-solid-state submicron thin film mesoscopic solar cell with efficiency exceeding 9%. Sci. Rep. 2, 591 (2012). doi:10.1038/srep00591 Medline
6. W. Chen, Y. Wu, Y. Yue, J. Liu, W. Zhang, X. Yang, H. Chen, E. Bi, I. Ashraful, M. Grätzel, L. Han, Efficient and stable large-area perovskite solar cells with inorganic charge extraction layers. Science 350, 944–948 (2015). doi:10.1126/science.aad1015 Medline
7. J. A. Christians, R. C. M. Fung, P. V. Kamat, An inorganic hole conductor for organo-lead halide perovskite solar cells. Improved hole conductivity with copper iodide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 758–764 (2014). doi:10.1021/ja411014k Medline
8. I. Chung, B. Lee, J. He, R. P. H. Chang, M. G. Kanatzidis, All-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with high efficiency. Nature 485, 486–489 (2012). doi:10.1038/nature11067 Medline
9. P. Qin, S. Tanaka, S. Ito, N. Tetreault, K. Manabe, H. Nishino, M. K. Nazeeruddin, M. Grätzel, Inorganic hole conductor-based lead halide perovskite solar cells with 12.4% conversion efficiency. Nat. Commun. 5, 3834 (2014). doi:10.1038/ncomms4834 Medline
10. J. E. Jaffe, T. C. Kaspar, T. C. Droubay, T. Varga, M. E. Bowden, G. J. Exarhos, Electronic and defect structures of CuSCN. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 9111–9117 (2010). doi:10.1021/jp101586q
11. J. W. Jung, C.-C. Chueh, A. K. Y. Jen, High-performance semitransparent perovskite solar cells with 10% power conversion efficiency and 25% average visible transmittance based on transparent CuSCN as the hole-transporting material. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500486 (2015). doi:10.1002/aenm.201500486
12. S. Ye, W. Sun, Y. Li, W. Yan, H. Peng, Z. Bian, Z. Liu, C. Huang, CuSCN-based inverted planar perovskite solar cell with an average PCE of 15.6%. Nano Lett. 15, 3723–3728 (2015). doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00116 Medline
13. M. Jung, Y. C. Kim, N. J. Jeon, W. S. Yang, J. Seo, J. H. Noh, S. Il Seok, Thermal stability of CuSCN hole conductor-based perovskite solar cells. ChemSusChem 9, 2592–2596 (2016). doi:10.1002/cssc.201600957 Medline
14. J. Liu, S. K. Pathak, N. Sakai, R. Sheng, S. Bai, Z. Wang, H. J. Snaith, Identification and mitigation of a critical interfacial instability in perovskite solar cells employing copper thiocyanate hole-transporter. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 3, 1600571 (2016). doi:10.1002/admi.201600571
15. S. Ye, H. Rao, W. Yan, Y. Li, W. Sun, H. Peng, Z. Liu, Z. Bian, Y. Li, C. Huang, A strategy to simplify the preparation process of perovskite solar cells by co-deposition of a hole-conductor and a perovskite layer. Adv. Mater. 28, 9648–9654 (2016). doi:10.1002/adma.201603850 Medline
16. V. E. Madhavan, I. Zimmermann, C. Roldán-Carmona, G. Grancini, M. Buffiere, A. Belaidi, M. K. Nazeeruddin, Copper thiocyanate inorganic hole-transporting material for high-efficiency perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 1112–1117 (2016). doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00501
17. N. Yaacobi-Gross, N. D. Treat, P. Pattanasattayavong, H. Faber, A. K. Perumal, N. Stingelin, D. D. C. Bradley, P. N. Stavrinou, M. Heeney, T. D. Anthopoulos, High efficiency organic photovoltaic cells based on the solution processable hole transporting interlayer copper thiocyanate (CuSCN) as a replacement for PEDOT:PSS. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401529 (2015). doi:10.1002/aenm.201401529
18. See supplementary materials.
19. M. Kabešová, M. Dunaj-jurčo, M. Serator, J. Gažo, J. Garaj, The crystal structure of copper(I) thiocyanate and its relation to the crystal structure of copper(II) diammine dithiocyanate complex. Inorg. Chim. Acta 17, 161–165 (1976). doi:10.1016/S0020-1693(00)81976-3
20. D. L. Smith, V. I. Saunders, The structure and polytypism of the β modification of copper(I) thiocyanate. Acta Crystallogr. B 37, 1807–1812 (1981). doi:10.1107/S0567740881007309
21. D. L. Smith, V. I. Saunders, Preparation and structure refinement of the 2H polytype of β-copper(I) thiocyanate. Acta Crystallogr. B 38, 907–909 (1982). doi:10.1107/S0567740882004361
22. Y. Han, S. Meyer, Y. Dkhissi, K. Weber, J. M. Pringle, U. Bach, L. Spiccia, Y.-B. Cheng, Degradation observations of encapsulated planar CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells at high temperatures and humidity. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 8139–8147 (2015). doi:10.1039/C5TA00358J
23. S. D. Stranks, G. E. Eperon, G. Grancini, C. Menelaou, M. J. P. Alcocer, T. Leijtens, L. M. Herz, A. Petrozza, H. J. Snaith, Electron-hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Science 342, 341–344 (2013). doi:10.1126/science.1243982 Medline
24. L. Kong, G. Liu, J. Gong, Q. Hu, R. D. Schaller, P. Dera, D. Zhang, Z. Liu, W. Yang, K. Zhu, Y. Tang, C. Wang, S.-H. Wei, T. Xu, H. K. Mao, Simultaneous band-gap narrowing and carrier-lifetime prolongation of organic-inorganic trihalide perovskites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 8910–8915 (2016). doi:10.1073/pnas.1609030113 Medline
25. M. I. Dar, G. Jacopin, S. Meloni, A. Mattoni, N. Arora, A. Boziki, S. M. Zakeeruddin, U. Rothlisberger, M. Grätzel, Origin of unusual bandgap shift and dual emission in organic-inorganic lead halide perovskites. Sci. Adv. 2, e1601156 (2016). doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601156 Medline
26. G. Xing, N. Mathews, S. Sun, S. S. Lim, Y. M. Lam, M. Grätzel, S. Mhaisalkar, T. C. Sum, Long-range balanced electron- and hole-transport lengths in organic-inorganic CH3NH3PbI3. Science 342, 344–347 (2013). doi:10.1126/science.1243167 Medline
27. K. Pydzińska, J. Karolczak, I. Kosta, R. Tena-Zaera, A. Todinova, J. Idígoras, J. A. Anta, M. Ziółek, Determination of interfacial charge-transfer rate constants in perovskite solar cells. ChemSusChem 9, 1647–1659 (2016). doi:10.1002/cssc.201600210 Medline
28. W. H. Nguyen, C. D. Bailie, E. L. Unger, M. D. McGehee, Enhancing the hole-conductivity of spiro-OMeTAD without oxygen or lithium salts by using spiro(TFSI)2 in perovskite and dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 10996–11001 (2014). doi:10.1021/ja504539w Medline
29. H.-S. Kim, N.-G. Park, Parameters affecting I–V hysteresis of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells: Effects of perovskite crystal size and mesoporous TiO2 layer. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2927–2934 (2014). doi:10.1021/jz501392m Medline
30. K. Tvingstedt, O. Malinkiewicz, A. Baumann, C. Deibel, H. J. Snaith, V. Dyakonov, H. J. Bolink, Radiative efficiency of lead iodide based perovskite solar cells. Sci. Rep. 4, 6071 (2014). doi:10.1038/srep06071 Medline
31. F. Bella, G. Griffini, J.-P. Correa-Baena, G. Saracco, M. Grätzel, A. Hagfeldt, S. Turri, C. Gerbaldi, Improving efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells with photocurable fluoropolymers. Science 354, 203–206 (2016). doi:10.1126/science.aah4046 Medline
32. J. Carrillo, A. Guerrero, S. Rahimnejad, O. Almora, I. Zarazua, E. Mas-Marza, J. Bisquert, G. Garcia-Belmonte, Ionic reactivity at contacts and aging of methylammonium lead triiodide perovskite solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1502246 (2016). doi:10.1002/aenm.201502246
33. M. Saliba, T. Matsui, J.-Y. Seo, K. Domanski, J.-P. Correa-Baena, M. K. Nazeeruddin, S. M. Zakeeruddin, W. Tress, A. Abate, A. Hagfeldt, M. Grätzel, Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: Improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1989–1997 (2016). doi:10.1039/C5EE03874J Medline
34. C. F. Macrae, P. R. Edgington, P. McCabe, E. Pidcock, G. P. Shields, R. Taylor, M. Towler, J. van de Streek, Mercury: Visualization and analysis of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39, 453–457 (2006). doi:10.1107/S002188980600731X