Supporting Data Access for Researchers: An LEA

Perspective

Christina Tyedeman Hawaii Department of Education

Sheri BallmanPrinceton City School District (OH)

A Product of the

LEA Data Access Working Group National Forum on Education Statistics

2

Forum Purpose

To improve the quality, comparability, and utility of elementary and secondary education data.

http://nces.ed.gov/forum

3

LEA Data Access Working GroupChairChristina Tydeman, Hawaii Department of Education

MembersSheri Ballman, Princeton City Public Schools (OH)Marilyn King, Bozeman School District #7 (MT)Linda Rocks, Bossier Parish School System (LA)Arleen Thompson, Boston Public Schools (MA)David Weinberger, Yonkers Public Schools (NY)

Project OfficerGhedam Bairu, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)

ConsultantsAbby Loughrey, Quality Information Partners (QIP)

4

Problem

Responding to and servicing researcher requests for data access requires a significant amount of LEA staff time and effort.

Requests often fail to align with the agency’s strategic priorities and, as a result, research findings infrequently support the LEA in its efforts to educate students.

5

Document Purpose

Recommend policies, practices, and templates that can be adapted/adopted by LEAs as they consider how to most effectively respond to requests for data access from researchers.

6

Audience

Primary Local education agency policymakers Local education agency data managers

Secondary Research community

7

Background

Forum Guide to Supporting Data Access for Researchers: A State Education Agency Perspective

8

Intended Outcome

The establishment of a robust data access framework:

Helps the LEA to more efficiently and responsibly support access to data

Results in findings that enhance the agency’s efforts to educate its students.

9

Types of Data Access Requests

10

Foundation: The Research Agenda Aligns with the LEA’s strategic plan. Guides researchers in designing projects that meet the

needs of the LEA. Dynamic—modified as the agency identifies new goals

and priorities.

11

CORE PRACTICESSteps for Handling Data Access Requests

12

Core Practices

1. Help Researchers Understand Agency Data and the Data Request Process

2. Create Effective Request Forms for Researchers3. Review Data Requests Strategically4. Manage the Data Request Process Efficiently5. Release Data Appropriately6. Monitor Data Use 7. Use research findings in the LEA

13

1. Inform Researchers Create, promote, and use a research agenda. Develop policies about training topics and requirements for

researchers. Identify or develop resources (e.g., training materials) to help

researchers better understand, request, and access new and existing data.

Determine when communications would be most useful to researchers during the data request/access/use timeline.

14

2. Create Effective Request Forms for Researchers Identify the information needed by the LEA to evaluate data access

requests; design forms that are likely to generate this information in an efficient manner.

Consider the use of a Preliminary Data Access Request form to minimize the burden on prospective researchers while still providing adequate information for an initial review of the request.

Design and implement a Full Data Access Request form that requires all of the information needed for the request to be evaluated.

15

3. Review Requests Strategically

Determine and post a process for channeling requests to the appropriate office or offices in the agency.

Assign responsibility for each incoming request. Standardize a review method or methods. Determine the participants and frequency of review team meetings. Establish a method for handling requests that cannot wait for a

review team meeting. Develop guidelines for handling requests that involve data from

other agencies.

16

4. Manage the Request Process Efficiently Establish and clearly communicate eligibility criteria. Develop a searchable system (for internal use) that tracks the entire

data access process, from receiving requests to data destruction. Determine how the LEA will communicate with researchers and

share formative information about the review status. Advise researchers about ways in which the request process can be

streamlined.

17

5. Permit Data Access Appropriately Create a checklist for review prior to releasing data to verify that the

researcher has completed all mandated training, paid any required fees, and signed all required agreements.

Establish procedures for providing the researcher with relevant metadata.

If providing access to new data, ensure that an LEA staff member—who is qualified to evaluate and enforce the legality and ethics of research activities—monitors all interactions between students and researchers (according to local policy).

If providing access to existing data, determine the format and media for releases and engage in data protection activities.

Record all disclosures in compliance with expectation set forth in FERPA.

18

6. Monitor Data Use Confirm researcher adherence to agreements through project

monitoring and data security audits. Consider reasonable modifications to the Data Accessing

Agreement when the researcher submits the appropriate forms and justifies any modifications to the original request.

Ensure that approved modifications are stored and tracked with the original request.

Review research outcomes to prevent any unintended disclosure of personally identifiable information.

Review any recordkeeping by the researcher to ensure that all privacy rights afforded to students and staff will be guaranteed.

Confirm project completion and data destruction.

19

7. Use Research Findings in the LEA Solicit results once research projects are complete. Encourage researchers to effectively communicate findings in ways

that are easily disseminated to a range of stakeholders including policymakers, administrators, practitioners, and parents.

Use the research findings to inform the work of the LEA. Build mutually beneficial relationships with researchers through

ongoing communication.

20

Core Practices Review

1. Help Researchers Understand Agency Data and the Data Request Process

2. Create Effective Request Forms for Researchers3. Review Data Requests Strategically4. Manage the Data Request Process Efficiently5. Release Data Appropriately6. Monitor Data Use 7. Use research findings in the LEA

21

Model of SuccessJefferson County Public Schools (KY)

Partnership with the University of Louisville’s College of Education and Human Development.

LEA teachers and administrators pursue doctoral degrees that culminate in research around the agency’s strategic plan.

Request process is automated through LEA website. Doctoral program’s leadership includes an LEA representative who

also sits on the university’s IRB (expedites LEA approval process and strengthens partnership).

Steps for informing and training researchers are embedded in the college’s coursework.

Monitoring is a coordinated effort between the LEA and university.

22

Additional Resources

Check the Forum website for the publication’s upcoming release.http://nces.ed.gov/forum/publications.asp

Refer to the SEA version of the guide.http://nces.ed.gov/forum/pub_2012809.asp

23

24

Questions???