SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …V. N. RAGHUPATHY Versus SRI KAYAROHANASAMY AND...

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 8 OF 2020 FROM : 03-03-2020 To 05-03-2020

COURT NO. : 9HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No. 5105/2009XIV-A

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVEDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 5106/2009XIV-A


VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, DELHI I ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 }



VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, DELHI I{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 }

2 Crl.A. No. 932/2008II-B

D.C.SANKHLA ETC ABHAY KUMAR, [P-1]Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1], ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2]

List the matters after two weeks. (Ref.: R/P dated 18.7.2019)ConnectedCrl.A. No. 992/2008II-B

SOM DUTT TYAGI AMARJIT SINGH BEDI[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1], ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2]

3 C.A. No. 5149/2011XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ANDORS. MADHU SIKRI

VersusSUPRIYA BASU PARTHA SILAs per ROP dated 28.11.2019, list in the second week of January, 2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 5148/2011XVI

SUPRIYA BASU PARTHA SIL

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MADHU SIKRI, GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-1]

4 C.A. No.9049-9053/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S K.C.SHARMA AND CO.. AND ORS. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[R-1]

COURT NO. : 9

5 C.A. No.3964-3965/2009XII

R.M. SUNDARAM @R.MEENAKSHISUNDARAM V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusSRI KAYAROHANASAMY ANDNEELAYABHAKSHI AMMAN TEMPLE T. HARISH KUMAR

6 C.A. No. 9778/2010IV-A

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP.LTD. . ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

VersusANIL PADEGAONKAR PRATIBHA JAIN{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 } Part Heard by Hon. Ashok Bhushan andHon. Navin Sinha,JJ.

ConnectedC.A. No. 9779/2010IV-A

ANIL PADEGAONKAR PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusBHARAT PETROLEUM CORP.LTD.. ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 }7 C.A. No. 1125/2009

XI-AMEENA PAUL AND ORS. ROMY CHACKO[P-1]VersusBIYATREES @ CHINNAMMA (DEAD) BYLRS. AND ORS.

P. GEORGE GIRI[R-1.1], [R-1.4], [R-1.3], [R-1.2],[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23534/2009XI-A

BIYATREES @ CHINNAMMA . (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS. P. GEORGE GIRI[P-1]

VersusC.G.MANNUEL @ KUNJACHAN . (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS.I.A. No. 1 Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP

8 C.A. No. 2444/2010XVI

KALAWATI DEVI MANJEET CHAWLAVersusPRABHAWATI DEVI DEAD THR. LRS.AND ANR. AND ANR. S. K. VERMA

9 C.A. No. 92/2009IV

RAJ PAL TR.SHEELA DEVI AJAY KUMAR SINGHVersusKIRPAL KAUR AND ORS. RAJESH AGGARWAL[R-2]ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENT NOTICE ISSUED ON 27.06.2018. AD card received.Service complete.

10 C.A. No. 5910/2009XII

K.RAKKIANNA GOUNDER K. K. MANIVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA, VINODH KANNA B.[R-2]

11 C.A. No. 6077/2009IV-A

GURUWARI BAI SATISH PANDEY[P-1]VersusJAGDISH PRASAD BANSAL SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-1]

12 C.A. No. 7297/2010IV-A

B.C.RAJAGOPAL NANDA KISHOREVersusLAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ANR. ANKUR S. KULKARNI

13 C.A. No. 2892/2009III-A

GIRIJA PRASAD TIWARI (D) THR. LRS. SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[P-1]Versus

RAMAPATI TIWARI (DEAD) AND ORS. AJIT SINGH PUNDIR[R-1], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-2], [R-3]

14 C.A. No.6721-6722/2009III

CHAMPALAL JAVANTRAJ SHETH E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

Versus

COURT NO. : 9

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2][GR], [R-3][GR],[R-11][GR], [R-12][GR], [R-13][GR], T.MAHIPAL[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-17], [R-28],[R-29], [R-30], [R-31], RASHMISINGHANIA[R-8], SHEELA GOEL[R-9],ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE[R-16], LAKSHMIRAMAN SINGH[R-19], MINAKSHI VIJ[R-4],[R-18], [R-20]

FOR ON IA 96406/2009

15 C.A. No. 1330/2010XI-A

THE LAW SECRETARY . LAW (B)DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA ANDORS.

G. PRAKASH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusK.P.GEORGE A. RAGHUNATH[R-1]

16 C.A. No. 2760/2010XIV-A

INDIAN BANK AND ANR. MADHU SIKRI, [P-2]VersusMAHAVEER KHARIWAL VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU

17 C.A. No. 5094/2011IV-A

DEREK A C LOBO AND ORS. PRITHA SRIKUMAR[P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusULRIC M A LOBO(DEAD) BY LRS. ANDORS. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-2], [R-3]

18 C.A. No. 6157/2013XIV-A

MAHANT SURENDRA NATH SUMITA HAZARIKA[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA[R-2], BINUTAMTA[R-3]

19 C.A. No. 9472/2010XII

A.SUBRAMANIAN AND ANR. G. BALAJIVersusR.PANNERSELVAM E. R. SUMATHY

20 C.A. No. 7230/2012XIV-A

HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION AND ANR. HIMANSHU TYAGI[P-1], VINOD SHARMA[P-2]

VersusHIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION RETIRED EMPLOYEESUNION

PRIYA PURI, [R-1]

21 C.A. No. 4394/2010XIV-A

BOLORAM BORDOLOI RAJIV MEHTA[P-1]VersusLAKHIMI GAOLIA BANK . AND ORS. MITTER & MITTER CO.[R-1], [R-1], [R-2], [R-5]

22 C.A. No.5800-5801/2017XII-A

YARLAGADDA PARTHASARADHI K. SARADA DEVI

VersusYARLAGADDA TULASAMMA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

23 Crl.A. No. 2103/2010II-B

V.P.SINGH SUDARSHAN RAJANVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1], [R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 } [ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2104/2010II-B

NITIN SHYAM PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB PREM MALHOTRA, [R-2], KARANBHARIHOKE[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 }ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2105/2010II-B

SARABJIT SINGH JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 }

COURT NO. : 924 C.A. No. 5167/2010

IVKHUSHI RAM AND ORS. RANBIR SINGH YADAV[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusNAWAL SINGH AND ORS. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

25 C.A. No. 1083/2012XII

T.NADU ELECT.BOARDAND ORS. ANDORS. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusK.SUBRAMAIAM S. GOWTHAMAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1084/2012XII

TAMILNADU ELEC.BOARD AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusM.RANGANATHAN(DEAD) THROUGHLRS MADHUSMITA BORA[R-1]


TAMILNADU ELEC.BOARD AND ANR.AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusA.CYRIL ANZU. K. VARKEY[R-1]

26 C.A. No. 9493/2010III

KAMLABEN(D) TR.LRS.. AND ORS. NACHIKETA JOSHI[P-1.2], [P-1.1], [P-1], [P-1.4],[P-1.3], [P-2.1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT . AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1]

27 C.A. No. 5389/2012XII-A

KALLAKURI PATTABHIRAMASWAMY(D)TR.LRS. G. MADHAVI

VersusKALLAKURI KAMARAJU . AND ORS. SUDHA GUPTA, P. VINAY KUMAR

28 C.A. No. 6218/2012IV-A

BIDAR INSTITUTE OF MEDICALSCIENCES P. R. RAMASESH

VersusABDULLA KHAN (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, S. USHA REDDYFOR [APPLICATION FOR TRANSPOSITION] ON IA 5/2016

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 35935/2016IV-A

ABDULLA KHAN (D) BY LRS. REP. BYGPA HOLDER MR. SHAMRAO S. USHA REDDY

Versus. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BIDAR . ANDORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.880/2017IV-A

BIDAR INSTITUTE OF MEDICALSCIENCES REP BY ITS DIRECTOR/PRINCIPAL

P. R. RAMASESH

VersusABDULLA KHAN (D) THR LRS AND ORS.(1)Non filing of required number of Paperbooks (1+3) (2)Non mentioning ofvolume number With page numbers in Index of Paper-books. (3)Affidavit


THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusABDULLA KHAN (D) BY LRS

29 C.A. No. 4020/2010III-A

U.P.HSG. AND DEVELOPMENT BOARDAND ANR. VISHWAJIT SINGH

VersusNAMIT SHARMA PRASHANT KUMAR

30 Crl.A. No. 1078/2010II-A

SURENDRA BANGALI @ S.S. ROUTELE PRAMOD DAYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND ANIL K. JHA[R-1]

31 Crl.A. No. 1050/2010II-C

SATBIR SINGH @ GATTU D. N. GOBURDHAN[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT.OF N.C.T.OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

COURT NO. : 932 Crl.A. No. 1008/2010

II-CR.DAMODARAN S. GOWTHAMANVersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

33 C.A. No.8721-8722/2010XI-A

KERALA REVENUE VILLAGE STAFFORGANISATION (KRVSO),REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY

RADHA SHYAM JENA[P-2]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI

34 C.A. No. 8163/2009IV

TEK CHAND JAGRATI SINGH[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], MAYURIRAGHUVANSHI[R-4]


SHRI SANJIB DEB ROY AND ANR. MAYURI RAGHUVANSHI[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], JAGRATISINGH[R-4], [R-6], [R-7], B. K. SATIJA[R-5],[R-8]

35 Crl.A. No. 361/2010II-A

ARIFVALI MUHAMMED SHAIKH HIMANSHU MUNSHI[P-1][SCLSC]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

36 C.A. No.4616-4618/2010IV

JAGMOHAN SINGH DHILLON ETC.ETC. D. MAHESH BABU

VersusSATWANT SINGH AND ORS. VINEET BHAGAT, KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-5]

37 Crl.A. No. 1910/2010II-A

BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANR. K. L. JANJANI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

38 Crl.A. No. 1533/2011II-A

SHRIKRISHNA AFTAB ALI KHANVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

39 Crl.A. No. 1889/2011II-B

HAMSA @ HAMMED HARINDER MOHAN SINGH[P-1][AMICUSCURIAE]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

40 Crl.A. No. 1404/2010II-A

SHRINIWAS TRIPATHI M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[R-1]

41 C.A. No. 3034/2012XII

RAMACHANDRA REDDY AND ORS. G. BALAJI[P-1]VersusRAMULU AMMAL SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR[R-1]

42 C.A. No.2037-2038/2010XI-A

ITTY P. K. MANOHAR

VersusIVY ABRAHAM AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, [R-2]

43 C.A. No.5199-5201/2011XIV-A

UNMUKT BHATNAGAR AND ORS. KUSUM CHAUDHARY[P-1]

VersusMANOJ BHATNAGAR (D) BY LRS.. ANDANR.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY[R-1.2], RAJIVRANJAN DWIVEDI[R-1]

44 Crl.A. No. 2004/2010II

HIMMATA RAM MUKUL KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

COURT NO. : 945 C.A. No.

9998-10009/2011III

AMRUTBHAI SOMABHAI PATEL RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER .AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26300/2015III

PATEL DASHRATHLAL RAMANLAL SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LTD AND ANR.


LASIBEN JIVANJI THROUGH HERPOWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERDASHRATHBHAI PATEL

SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LIMITED . AND ANR.


THAKOR PAPATJI GABHAJI THROUGHHIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERDASHRATHBHAI PATEL

SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LIMITED . AND ANR.

46 C.A. No. 3876/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYAVersus

JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L.JANJANI, EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3874/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVT.AUTH. S. K. BHATTACHARYA[P-1]

VersusM/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

COAC[R-1], PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], K. L.JANJANI[R-1], EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1]


JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTDAND ORS. AND ORS.

COAC, PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K.L. JANJANI, EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES



VersusM/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.




VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.



UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Versus

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP. . ANDORS.

PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-2],[R-3], S. K. BHATTACHARYA[R-4], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-10], K. L. JANJANI[R-11], [R-12],[R-13]


STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH P.LTD..AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, SARVESH SINGHBAGHEL, COAC


THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

COURT NO. : 9M/S SMS INVESTMENT CORPPORATION(P) LTD. AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L.JANJANI, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC


STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusJAMEA HIDYAT TRUST . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC


THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusTHE JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORSAND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, K. L. JANJANI, COAC



VersusM/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL, PRATIBHA JAIN, K.L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC



VersusM/S SMS INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L.JANJANI, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No.15528-15531/2017XV

ABDUL RASHID MIR AND ANR. MUKUL KUMAR

Versus

M/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT.LTD.AND ORS AND ORS.

B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-5], [R-6], ROHIT K.SINGH[R-2]

47 Crl.A. No. 108/2012II-A

GUNA MAHTOVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND GOPAL PRASAD

48 Crl.A. No. 2251/2010II-C

FEDRICK CUTINHA S. N. BHAT[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2265/2010II-C

KRISHNAPPA @ KITTU NAIKA N. ANNAPOORANI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

49 C.A. No. 7334/2010XII

ARUCHAMY GOUNDER @ARUMUGHAM(D)TH:LR AND ORS. V. BALACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusM. BALASUBRAMANIAM VIKAS MEHTA[R-1]and IA No.92110/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.92111/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

50 C.A. No. 550/2016III-A

STATE OF UP THR. SECRETARY ANDORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

Versus

PRAHALAD KUMAR AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 } As per Hon'ble Court's Order dated31.07.2019, List the matters after two weeks.

ConnectedC.A. No. 551/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. REVENUE DEPARTMENTTHROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

AMAR SINGH (DEAD) AND ORS.

SONAL JAIN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14],[R-15], [R-16], [R-17], [R-19], [R-21], [R-22],[R-23], [R-24], MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[R-8],[R-18]

COURT NO. : 9{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 }


STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARYAND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusGRAM UDYOG SANSTHAN THROUGHITS CHAIRMAN BHAGWAN DAS (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS.

MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-5]

{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 } FOR FOR ON IA 8/2015 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 9/2015 FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA88370/2019 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.ON IA 88371/2019 FOR SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT ON IA 88372/2019 FORAPPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE APPLICATION FORSETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT ON IA 88374/2019


STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARYAND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusMAHESH CHAND AND ANR. AMIT DAYAL[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 }


STATE OF U.P. REVENUE DEPARTMENTTHROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusM/S BHARAT LIME INDUSTRY AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 }

51 C.A. No. 8070/2010IV-A

GOVT. TOOL ROOM AND TRAININGCENTRE S. N. BHAT[P-1]

VersusH.N. YOGA RAJAN AND ANR. NARESH KUMAR[R-1]

52 Crl.A. No. 811/2011II-C

NAGOOR PICHAI @ BADUSHA VIPIN KUMAR JAIVersusTHE STATE THROUGH SUB INSPECTOROF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

53 Crl.A. No. 1380/2012II-A

MD. ASLAM JAIL PETITION[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH[R-1]Mr. Sanjay Mani Tripathi, Advocate is NOR Amicus curiae

54 C.A. No. 4749/2011XII

P.P.RATHI V. BALACHANDRANVersusARULMIGU MALLIGESWARARTHIRUKOIL AND ORS. AND ORS. R. SATHISH

55 Crl.A. No.1663-1664/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPRADEEP MISRA[R-1], YADAV NARENDERSINGH[R-2], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-3], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10]

ONLY IA No.110881/2017- APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION FOR VACATION OFSTAY TO BE LISTED IN CRL.A. NO. 1663-64/2015 ONLY ON 01.05.2018

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1665-1666/2015II


Versus

RIZWAN . AND ORS. PRADEEP MISRA[R-2], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1667-1668/2015II


Versus

BADRUDDIN . AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-3],PRADEEP MISRA[R-2]

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1669/2015II

ANIL KUMAR DHAKA RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDANR.

PRADEEP MISRA[R-1], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1670/2015II


Versus

WASEEM AND ANR. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1], PRADEEPMISRA[R-2]

56 C.A. No.1137-1138/2011IV

ZILE SINGH ETC. AND ANR. RISHI MALHOTRA

Versus

CHATTER SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS.

(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA, VINOD SHARMA[R-1.2],[R-1.1], [R-1.4], [R-1.3], [R-8.6], [R-8.5], [R-8.4],[R-8.3], [R-8.2], [R-8.1]

57 Crl.A. No. 2418/2010II-C

C.VILVANATHAN SANGEETA KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

58 Crl.A. No. 2035/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusNIRBHAY SINGH IRSHAD AHMAD[R-2]

59 C.A. No. 7580/2012XI-A

PRAKASAN M.P.. AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],SANAND RAMAKRISHNAN[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. G. PRAKASH[R-1]

60 C.A. No. 10766/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH COLLECTOR AND ANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

NANWA (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANR. S. R. SETIA[R-1], SUDHIRKULSHRESHTHA[R-2]

61 Crl.A. No. 191/2011II-C

K.RAJENDRAN V. RAMASUBRAMANIANVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

62 C.A. No.1869-1871/2018XII

BALASUNDARAM AND ORS. AND ORS. VIPIN NAIR[P-1][PR], [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR]

VersusRAMALINGAM AND ORS. AND ORS.ADVOCATE NAME: MR. VIPIN NAIR(FOR PETITIONER)

63 C.A. No. 97-98/2012XIV-A

INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURALRESEARCH THROUGH THE DIRECTORGENERAL AND ANR.

PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

RAJINDER SINGH . AND ORS. SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-9]

64 C.A. No. 11196/2011IV-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPURVersusA.G.D. REDDY S. N. BHAT

65 Crl.A. No. 233/2013II-B

BISHNUPADA DUTTA AND ANR. RANJAN MUKHERJEEVersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

COURT NO. : 9

66 C.A. No. 3927/2018XII-A

G. MADHUSUDHANA PRASAD AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1], [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR],[P-4][PR], [P-5][PR], [P-6][PR], [P-7][PR],[P-8][PR], [P-9][PR], [P-10][PR], [P-11][PR],[P-12][PR], [P-13][PR], [P-14][PR], [P-15][PR],[P-16][PR], [P-17][PR], [P-18][PR], [P-19][PR],[P-20][PR], [P-21][PR]

Versus

M. LAKXMIKANT AND ORS.G. N. REDDY[R-1], [R-6][GR], [R-7][GR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6]SADINENI RAVI KUMAR[I-1][IMPL],[I-2][IMPL], [I-3][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3928/2018XII-A

P.V.RAMAPATHI RAO AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF A.P. AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-1]


M.B. HEMLATHA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

M. LAXMIKANTH AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6], [R-6]


N. VIJAY KUMAR C. K. RAI[P-1]

Versus

G. MOHAN REDDY AND ORS. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-1], G. N. REDDY[R-6],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-7]


K.ANANTHA REDDY AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAND ORS.

GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-1][GR], [R-2][PR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-1],[R-2], [R-2], ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-3], [R-4]


M.PENCHALA RAJU AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Versus

M.LAXMIKANTH AND ORS.G. N. REDDY, SADINENI RAVI KUMAR[R-1], C.S. N. MOHAN RAO[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR], VENKATPALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6]

FOR ON IA 11/2014 (Application for impleadment FILED BY MR. C.S.N. MOHANRAO)

67 C.A. No. 6640/2013III-A

VIKAS JAINVersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

68 C.A. No. 3795/2012XII

AROCKIAMARY AND ORS. AND ORS. V. BALACHANDRANVersusKULANDAIAMMAL AND ORS. AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN, SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

69 C.A. No. 11341/2013XIV-A

SHANKAR KUMAR T. L. GARGVersusRAM NARAIN AND ANR. PAHLAD SINGH SHARMA, VISHWA PAL SINGH

70 C.A. No.5785-5788/2011III-A

SHAUKAT NARESH KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. . AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2]

71 C.A. No. 652/2019XII

S.GAJAGANAPATHY RAKESH K. SHARMAVersusS.RATHINASABABATHY (DEAD) THR LRSAND ORS AND ORS. SUMIT KUMAR, S. R. SETIA[R-3]

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 653/2019XII

SHANKAR P. N. RAMALINGAM

VersusS.RATHINASABABATHY (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. SUMIT KUMAR, S. R. SETIA

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/201272 Crl.A. No. 1627/2013

II-BMAHENDRABHAI NATHABHAI RAVAL DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

73 C.A. No. 6213/2016IV

TRUST MANDIR THAKUR RAMLACCHAMN JI MAHRAJ ARJUN SINGH BHATI

Versus

PURAN (D) THR. LRS. . AND ORS. A. N. ARORA, RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI,KRISHAN KUMAR, SHILPA SINGH[R-5]

74 Crl.A. No. 1265/2012II-C

T.G.KRISHNAMURTHY. AND ORS. AMAN MOHIT HINGORANIVersusSTATE OF KARNATAKATHROUGHTARIKERE POLICE AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

75 C.A. No. 5859/2012IV

OM PRAKASH AMAN MOHIT HINGORANIVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

76 C.A. No. 356/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 361-363/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR


M/S. INDO AMERICAL EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR.


M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.



VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.



VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX


M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 379/2015III

C.I.T-VIII MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 387/2015III

C.I.T 8 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]


COMM. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]


COMM. OF INCOME TAX VIII ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMONOSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]


M/S INDO AMERICAN EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR


M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX .AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101654/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4579/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 11(4) AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]



VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]


M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM, [P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]


M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]



VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

and IA No.101655/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4585/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX .AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101658/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TAX CBUILDING AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101669/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.List alongwith C.A. No. 356 of 2017



VersusM/S. ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.106019/2017-XTRA



VersusM/S ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101679/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE


THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IBANGALORE . AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR



THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR



M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR], [R-2][GR]



Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]



Versus

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3789/2016IV-A


Versus

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]



Versus

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]



Versus

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]



Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2253/2020IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 10 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.879/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.880/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURINGTHE DEFECTS

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26688/2019IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LIMITED RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.165232/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

77 C.A. No. 9289/2013III

B.P. SINGH RAHUL KAUSHIKVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

78 Crl.A. No. 1179/2012II-B

NARENDRASINH KESHUBHAI ZALA RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA[P-1][SCLSC]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

79 C.A. No. 1537/2016XII

R.JANKIAMMAL VIKAS MEHTAVersus

S.K.KUMARASWAMY (D) THR.LRS. ANDORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY, S. RAVI SHANKAR,PRABHA SWAMI, K. V. MOHAN, PALLAVILANGAR[R-2], [R-2]


S.R. SOMASUNDARAM AND ANR. GAURAV AGRAWAL, , S. RAVI SHANKAR

VersusS.K.KUJMARASWAMY (D) THRU LRS. .AND ORS. AND ORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY, VIKAS MEHTA, K.V. MOHAN

FOR FOR ON IA 5/2017 FOR [BRINGING ON RECORD LRS] ON IA 90850/201880 C.A. No. 6610/2015

XVILAKHAN SAO(D) THR. HIS L.RS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

PARWATI DEVI . AND ORS. BANKEY BIHARI SHARMA, SUBHASISHBHOWMICK

COURT NO. : 981 Crl.A. No. 759/2013

II-BSAMABHAI RAMSUBHAI KISHORI MANISHA T. KARIA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]REF; HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED 06.06.2019 LIST THE MATTER AFTERVACATION

82 Crl.A. No.905-908/2013II

NANHE SINGH . AND ORS. KRISHNA PAL SINGH

VersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIAand IA No.88592/2017-I/A FOR BAIL and IA No.88596/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.126819/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.16996/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

83 C.A. No.10423-10424/2017IV-A

H.M.SHIVANNA(D) BY LRS. AND ANR.AND ANR. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.AND ORS.

ANKUR S. KULKARNI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY,VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

IA NO. 152152/2019(FOR DIRECTION) IN CA 10423-24/2017 ONLY TO BE LISTEDBEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT

84 Crl.A. No. 1290/2012II

MAHAVEER SINGH MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

85 C.A. No. 11161/2017IV-A

GURUSHANTAYYA ANIL KUMARVersusGOURAVVA AND ORS. TULIKA PRAKASH, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE


NEELAKANTAYYA TULIKA PRAKASH

VersusGURUSHANTAYYA AND ORS. ANIL KUMAR, AFTAB ALI KHAN

86 Crl.A. No.148-151/2014II

ANJUM KHAN SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETRY

AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-1], P.NARASIMHAN[R-1], [R-2]

87 C.A. No. 5921/2014XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1]Versus

K. KAJNA . AND ORS. AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-1], P.NARASIMHAN[R-1], [R-2]

88 C.A. No. 15150/2017XIV-A

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROYVersus

MUKUT RANJAN SARMA . AND ORS.

SHAILESH MADIYAL, [R-6], [R-7], [R-10],[R-11], RAHUL PRATAP[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-8], [R-9], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16],[R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20], [R-21], [R-22],[R-23], [R-24], [R-25], [R-26], [R-27], [R-28],[R-29], [R-30], [R-31], [R-32], [R-33], [R-34],[R-35], [R-36], [R-37], [R-38], [R-39], [R-40]

89 C.A. No.6776-6777/2013III

KAZI AKILODDIN CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

90 C.A. No. 8772/2013III

SHIVAJI RAMCHANDRA SAWANT ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]VersusDINESH RAMCHANDRA SAWANT ANDORS. S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY[R-1], [R-2]

91 Crl.A. No. 1122/2017II-A

NANDESHWAR KUMAR SUBHRO SANYAL[P-1]Versus

COURT NO. : 9

RAJENDRA PRASAD PANDEY AND ORS. KUMAR MIHIR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-6]

92 C.A. No. 9884/2013XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASIVersusK. BHANAMMA VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R

ConnectedC.A. No. 9885/2013XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI[P-1]

VersusP.M.ANTONY VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 33132/2015XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusSAJITHA P.M. . AND ANR.

93 W.P.(C) No. 984/2013PIL-W

TELANGANA VIKAS KENDRA MANOJ C. MISHRA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 207/2014PIL-W

VISHNU ALLURI AND ANR. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[R-1], CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], AMIT SHARMA[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-5]

FOR FOR ON IA 5/2017 FOR ON IA 7/2017 and IA No.86398/2017-impleading partyand IA No.86412/2017-PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW AN IA


M. RAJAMOHAN REDDY SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-3]


K. RAGHU RAMAKRISHNA RAJU ANDANR. N. RAJARAMAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

Office Report for DirectionsConnectedW.P.(C) No. 203/2014PIL-W

M. GOPI KRISHNA

VersusUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI, CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON


MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ADVOCATE PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-3]


KARNATAKA TELUGU PRAJA SAMITHI NARESH KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

U.O.I. AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2]


MATTEGUNTA RAMAKRISHNA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], SUSHMASURI[R-2]


PENDURTHI VENKATESH A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

COURT NO. : 9

UNION OF INDIAB. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1],CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-2]


VUNDAVALLI ARUN KUMAR PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]


MUPPALLA SUBBARAO AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]


RASTHRIYA PRAJA CONGRESS(SECULAR) A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.B. KRISHNA PRASAD, SUSHMA SURI[R-1],CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-2]


K. PRABHAKAR RAJU AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]


NALLARI KIRAN KUMAR REDDY ANDORS. ANNAM D. N. RAO[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]


RAYAPATI SAMBASIVA RAO AND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]


B. SANJEEVA RAO PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-4]


MATTA JAYAKAR AND ANR. M. VIJAYA BHASKAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], D. MAHESH BABU[R-2], C. K.SUCHARITA[R-2]


K.K SHERWANI R. C. KAUSHIK[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-2]


P.R. KRISHNAN AND ANR. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1], M. A.CHINNASAMY[P-1]

Versus

COURT NO. : 9

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-3], [R-4],ASWATHI M.K.[R-5], SUMEET LALL[R-6],ASHOK KUMAR SINGH[R-7], P. V.YOGESWARAN[R-8], ANINDITA PUJARI[R-9],UTTARA BABBAR[R-10], RUCHI KOHLI[R-11],GOPAL SINGH[R-12], RAJIV NANDA[R-13],PARIJAT SINHA[R-14]


BANDI SREEKANTH & 3 ORS CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

VersusUOI AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI


CHANAMOLU LAKSHMI ANUPAMA ANDORS. R. NEDUMARAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1],S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]


D.SURAYANARAYANA AND ORS. K. SARADA DEVI

VersusGOVT. OF INIDA SUSHMA SURI, D. BHARATHI REDDY


HARITHA SARANGA AND ORS. AND ORS. V. K. MONGA

VersusUNION OF INDIA GUNTUR PRABHAKAR


VISHNU ALLURI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI[R-1]


DR.M.SHARATH CHANDRA REDDY VIPIN KUMAR JAI

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI


MUTTEEVI VENKATAPPA LAKSHMI ANDORS. P. VINAY KUMAR

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR,GUNTUR PRABHAKAR


PONGULETI SUDHAKAR REDDY D. MAHESH BABU

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-3], GURMEETSINGH MAKKER[R-4], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-5], [R-6], ANIL KATIYAR[R-7], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-8], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-9]AMIT K. NAIN[IMPL]APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[INT]

94 Crl.A. No.278-279/2016II-A

BHUNESHWAR YADAV AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

NIRMAL SINGH AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[R-3], SHANTANUSAGAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5]

95 C.A. No. 7364/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]Versus

SHYAMA NANDAN MISHRA SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-1], AKHILESHKUMAR PANDEY[R-1]

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 7371/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

Versus

SARWAR AKRAM KHAN AND ORS. SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], DIVYA ROY[R-6]



VersusKARUNESH KUMAR AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1], DIVYA ROY[R-1]


STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

Versus

SUBHAS CHANDRA SINGH SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6]



VersusJAYA TIWARY DIVYA ROY[R-1]



VersusPRABIN CHANDRA SINGH SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1]

96 C.A. No. 5943/2014III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHMEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES THR.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANKIT GOEL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusDR. OM PRAKASH AGGARWAL

97 Crl.A. No.2314-2319/2014II-A

SHIV SHANKAR SAHI CHANDRA PRAKASH[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1], SUBHROSANYAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

98 C.A. No.8214-8215/2016X

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHANDUTTARAKHAND PEY JAL S.V.E.N.NIGAMMANAGING DIRECTOR

SHIRIN KHAJURIA[P-1]

Versus

JAGDISH CHANDRA PANDEYRASHMI NANDAKUMAR[R-3], ANURAGKISHORE[R-5], GARVESH KABRA[R-6][PR],[R-7][PR], [R-8][PR], [R-9][PR], [R-10][PR],[R-11][PR], [R-12][PR], [R-14][PR]

{Fixed Date by Court for 03-03-2020 } [ Retain its Position ]ConnectedC.A. No.8216-8217/2016X

SUBHASH CHANDRA ANURAG KISHORE

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHANDSECRETARY AND ORS.

SHIRIN KHAJURIA[R-2], [R-3], GARVESHKABRA[R-16][PR]


III-AU.P. RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM LIMITED TUSHAR BAKSHIVersusL.N. GUPTA

100 Crl.A. No. 1856/2014II-C

RAHIL AND ANR. MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]


SURAIYA MUSHTAQ AHMAD

Versus

COURT NO. : 9STATE OF (GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. OFDELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

101 C.A. No. 5477/2016X

MANOJ KUMAR . AND ORS. ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND . THROUGHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2]

102 Crl.A. No. 1039/2015II-B

OM PARKASH SINGH ANIS AHMED KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

103 C.A. No. 9735/2016III

NAGPUR SHIKSHAN MANDAL AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

VARSHA VINOD SAYAM AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ANAGHA S. DESAI


NAGPUR SHIKSHAN MANDAL AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

NANDA WAKDE AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ANAGHA S. DESAI

104 C.A. No. 1443/2017XIV-A

ROSHAN LAL GUPTA (DEAD) THROUGHLRS. PIYUSH SHARMA[P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-1.1], [P-1.4]

VersusIDBI BANK LIMITED AND ANR. RABIN MAJUMDER

105 Crl.A. No. 334/2015II-A

SATISH PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANDANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 18856/2016

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 1306/2015II-A

VILAS PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANAGHA S. DESAI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

106 Crl.A. No. 106/2018II-C

MALTI @ K.S. PRIYA @ SHANTI @PREMKUMARI AND ANR. KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]

107 C.A. No.5208-5211/2017XII

V. MASILAMANI AND ORS. ETC. ETC.AND ANR.

ANKUR S. KULKARNI, GURMEET SINGHMAKKER

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.AND ANR. VIJAY KUMAR, SRIRAM P.

IA No.91307/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION IS TO BE LISTED.108 C.A. No. 9879/2017

XVTHE INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDIVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

MATTER RESTORE BY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN AND HON'BLEMR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ON 15.07.2019

ConnectedC.A. No.9880-9886/2017XV

THE INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDI

Versus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN . AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[CAVEAT]

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No.9887-9891/2017XV

INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDI

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARYAND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR

109 C.A. No. 5780/2015XV

IRSHAD(D)THROUGH LRS. SHOBHA GUPTA[P-1]VersusSHARAFAT HUSSAIN PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1]

110 Crl.A. No. 828/2015II-A

SANJAY VITHHAL PACHAGHARE B. K. PAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

111 Crl.A. No. 1203/2015II-B

RAKESH KUMAR SINGH VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

112 C.A. No. 132/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAOVersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR


SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT.LTD.(NOW) MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD) NEW DELHI

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR


SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD.(NOW MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD)

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ANIL KATIYAR


CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

FOR PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS ON IA102664/2018


CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR


CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR


CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. THR. MASAONAKA, MD KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

COURT NO. : 9

M/S. CANNON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.



VersusM/S DAIKIN AIR-CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. HAIER APPLICANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS INDIALTD. POOJA DHAR



VersusM/S. DAIKIN AIR - CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD KISHORE KUNAL


REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR


DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3 (1) NEW DEHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]


DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

Versus

M/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM[R-1]


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AMADEUS INDIA PVT. LTD. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 527/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTOSHIBA INDIA PVT. LTD. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI - 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARPA BUSINESS SYSTEM(INDIA) PVT. LTD. POOJA DHAR


REEBOK INDIA COMPANY KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]


HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA ) P. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX


HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX


HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -IVNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT LTD


DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.5905-5906/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR


ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR


DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

Versus

COURT NO. : 9BAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR


THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX RANGE 2 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA )PVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA



VersusM/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.11110-11111/2016XIV-A

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMARand FOR AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 119430/2017


PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-09 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S TOSHIBA INDIA PVT LTD AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[R-1]


PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX DELHI-2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOSE CORPORATION INDIA PVTLTD HARISH PANDEY[R-1]


DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

IA No.80934/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.80937/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT


DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]


PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE INDIAPVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1]


PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

COURT NO. : 9HONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.IA No.14992/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No.13384-13385/2018XIV


Versus

AMADEUS INDIA PVT LTD SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA64556/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 10952-2018XIV

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT. LTD.


PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PVT. LTD.


PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.55855/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.55856/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20829/2018XV


VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.76572/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.76573/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20837/2018XV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD DIRECTOR TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.86519/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17094/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMAKE MY TRIP INDIA PVT. LTD SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]


PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXALWAR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.118232/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.118233/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.118234/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHYLIST OF DATES


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SONY INDIA PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.134327/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.134329/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.134326/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

COURT NO. : 9M/S SONY INDIA PVT LTDIA No.94691/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING


THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTOSHIBA INDIA PVT. LTD. NEERAJ KUMAR GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.25310/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING


THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHAIER APPLIANCES INDIA LIMTIEDFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.23682/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

113 C.A. No. 10433/2016III

SMT. SUSHILABAI TUKARAM PATIL ANDANR. SACHIN PATIL

VersusSUBHASH KAKASAHEB PATIL . ANDORS. S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

114 Crl.A. No.1410-1412/2015II-A

RAJKUMAR SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA POLICESTATON INCHARGE AND ORS. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], AMOL B. KARANDE[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(Crl.)...CRLMP No.4705-4706/2016II-A

LAXMAN S/O DADARAO KARANDE AMOL B. KARANDE

Versus

RAJKUMAR AND ANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1823/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[P-1]

VersusRAJKUMAR

115 Crl.A. No.1419-1420/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[P-1]

VersusRAMESH JIJEBA LAHANE MANJU JETLEY[R-1]MR. MAHABIR SINGH, SENIOR ADVOCATE APPOINTED AS AMICUS CURIAE TOASSIST THE HON. COURT IN THE INSTANT MATTER

116 C.A. No.21828-21831/2017XII

M.R. SRINIVASAN AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS. GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusASSOCIATION OF TAMIL NADUHIGHWAYS ENGINEERS AND ORS. ETC.

PRANAV SACHDEVA[R-1], VINODH KANNAB.[R-2], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-3][GR]

117 Crl.A. No. 616/2016II

DHARAMPAL AND ANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1], FARRUKHRASHEED[R-1]

and IA No.7690/2018-BAIL APPLICATION118 C.A. No. 7257/2016

III-AVIPIN KUMAR SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P THR. PRINCIPALSECRETARY . AND ORS.

GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]


SHRAVAN KUMAR ASHA GOPALAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],VINAY GARG[R-4]

COURT NO. : 9and IA No.105549/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

119 C.A. No. 6122/2016XVI

SAHID ALIM AND ORS. AND ORS. CHANDRA PRAKASHVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ANDORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

120 C.A. No. 7397/2016III-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusGAJENDRA TEWARI ANURAG KISHORE[R-1]

121 Crl.A. No. 44/2017II-C

MOHD. VAKIL AFTAB ALI KHAN[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

122 Crl.A. No. 1078/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusRAMESH ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-1]

123 Crl.A. No. 1229/2017II-C

CHAMAN LAL RADHIKA GAUTAM[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AJAY MARWAH[R-1][GR]HEARING EXPEDITED VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 21.07.2018 AND04.07.2018.FOR FINAL ARGUMENTS AND DISPOSAL VIDE HON'BLE COURT'SORDER DATED 04.07.2018.

124 C.A. No. 4934/2017III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusADANI ENTERPRISES LTD TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[R-1]

125 C.A. No. 82/2019III

SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MUNAWWAR NASEEM[P-1]VersusGAURAV KANVAR JUNEJA AND ORS. RUPESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

126 Crl.A. No. 1730/2017II-B

VINOBHAI M. P. VINODVersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

127 Crl.A. No. 1801/2017II-A

THE STATE OF BIHAR NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1]VersusKAMESHWAR PRASAD YADAV ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY[R-1]

128 Crl.A. No. 1537/2017II-B

JAYRAJSINH TEMUBHA JADEJA R. C. KOHLI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]RAHUL GUPTA[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1538/2017II-B

AMARJITSINH ANIRUDHDHSINH JADEJAAND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]RAHUL GUPTA[I-1][IMPL]

129 Crl.A. No. 132/2018II-C

SHRI DEEPAK SRIVASTAV RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARYVersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]


RAJENDER SRIVASTAV RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARY

VersusSTATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

130 C.A. No. 2201/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. B. S. BANTHIA[CAVEAT], ARJUN GARG[R-1]

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 2202/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. CHRISTI JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. B. S. BANTHIA[CAVEAT], ARJUN GARG[R-1]

FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA159123/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 159125/2018

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.1072/2018 in C.A. No.2201/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN

Versus

ABHAY CHAUDHARY AND ORS. B. S. BANTHIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5]

IN C.A. No. - 2201/2018,

ConnectedC.A. No.4533-4534/2019IV-A

FIRM M/S GWALIOR LAND DEALS ANDFINANCE THROUGH PARTNER HARISHANKAR GOYAL(DEAD) THROUGH LRS

CHRISTI JAIN

VersusSURESH KUMAR AND ORS. ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA[R-4.1]


SURESH KUMAR ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA

VersusFIRM M/S GWALIOR LAND DEALS ANDFINANCE, LASHKAR AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.6356/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.6358/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.6357/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

131 Crl.A. No. 404/2018II-C

ARUN KUMAR AMIT AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.


ARUN KUMAR AMIT AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.31495/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP

132 C.A. No. 4418/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFWEALTH TAX, I NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ORIENTAL BUILDING ANDFURNISHING CO. LTD MANAGINGDIRECTORFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54053/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.54056/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT


PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFWEALTH TAX 1 DELHI TA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ORIENTAL BUILDING ANDFURNISHING CO. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54114/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.54115/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

133 C.A. No. 8989/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM[R-1]


ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

COURT NO. : 9M/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM


ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM[R-1]

134 C.A. No. 1844/2010IV-A

H.S.GOUTHAM BHARTI TYAGI[P-1]VersusRAMA MURTHY AND ANR. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2]{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 }


H.M.RAVINDRA KUMAR ROHIT AMIT STHALEKAR[P-1]

Versus

RAMA MURTHY AND ORS. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2], A. SUBBARAO[R-3]


XII-AC.CHANDRA PRAKASH . AND ORS. ANU GUPTAVersusC.SETHRAMMA RAO AND ORS. D. BHARATHI REDDY{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 }

136 C.A. No. 11842/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } Part Heard by Hon. Ashok Bhushan andHon. Navin Sinha,JJ.


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOWN M/S. MARUTIUDYOG LTD.)

KAVITA JHA

{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } IA No.140408/2018-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING and IA No.140410/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT


PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6(FORMERLY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II) NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) NEWDELHI

KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.137205/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.137207/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MARUTI UDYOG LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.155109/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.155110/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.151988/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.151989/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 11921/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. THROUGHDIRECTOR KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.142970/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING


PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6(FORMERLY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II)

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.143757/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING


PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.157069/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING



VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.154277/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING



VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.159765/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING



VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.181936/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.181938/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MARUTI UDYOG LIMITED (NOWKNOWN AS MARUTI SUZUKI INDIALIMITED

KAVITA JHA[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.13185/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.13192/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 }


COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 04-03-2020 }

COURT NO. : 9137 C.A. No. 3185/2011

IXMANOJ B. JOSHI BHASKAR Y. KULKARNIVersusTHE 8TH INCOME TAX OFFICER ANDORS. AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

{Fixed Date by Court for 05-03-2020 }

NEW DELHI28-02-2020 16:57:32

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Date post:	05-Oct-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …V. N. RAGHUPATHY Versus SRI KAYAROHANASAMY AND...

Documents