SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & … · vakalatnama and memo of appearance are...

SUPREME COURT OF INDIALIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION)

IN THE CHAMBERS OFHON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 06-09-2018HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN(TIME : 1:30 PM)

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent1001 CURATIVE PET(C) No.

249/2017 in R.P.(C) No.3835/2016 In SLP(C)No. 7172/2016XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

VersusRAMESWAR PRAMANIK AND ORS.IN R.P.(C) No. - 3835/2016, IN SLP(C) No. -7172/2016,

NEW DELHI04-09-2018 16:07:09

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR




HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO

(TIME : 1:35 PM)


239/2017 in R.P.(C) No.730/2017 in SLP(C) No.34667/2016IV-A

MAHESH CHANDRA RAGHUWANSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.IN R.P.(C) No. - 730/2017, IN SLP(C) No. -34667/2016,

NEW DELHI04-09-2018 16:07:22





HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA(TIME : 1:40 PM)


251/2017 in R.P.(C) No.576/2017 In SLP(C) No.2150/2017XVI

KAMLA DEVI (DEAD) THR LRS. SHYAM SUNDARPRASAD AND ORS.

VersusLAL KESHARI DEVI (DEAD) THR LRS. MEERA DEVIAND ORS.IN R.P.(C) No. - 576/2017, IN SLP(C) No. -2150/2017,

NEW DELHI04-09-2018 16:07:51


SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 06-09-2018COURT NO. : 7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA(TIME : 10:30 AM)

CHAMBER MATTERS

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

[DIRECTION MATTERS]

1 Diary No. 24998-2017II-A

MAHARAJ SINGH AND ORS. C. L. SAHU

VersusGAYATRI BAI(1)Other-INCOMPLETE MATTER TO BERECHECKED LATER.

2 Diary No. 11256-2018XVI-A

KUMARI SULEKHA VIPIN KUMAR JAI

VersusAMIT KUMAR RAJAK(1)Other-PAGINATION OFANNEX. IN TP.(2)Other-PENDINGCOURT DETAILS TO BE CHECKED.(3)Other-ANNEXUREP-1 IS INCOMPLETE. TO BE CHECKED.(4)Other-PRAYER OFSTAY NOT PROPER.(5)Other-AGE BEMENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT.(6)Other-TP PRAYERNOT PROPER.(7)Incomplete/INCORRECTaddresses/STATUS of the parties and theirrepresentatives.-(8)Non-Filing of Memo of Parties,as detailed cause title not given in the impugnedjudgment.- (9)Causetitle of thepetition/appeal not corresponding to that of theimpugned judgment and names of partiestherein.- 

3 Diary No. 6652-2018II-A

ADESH MISHRA PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH(1)Other-LISTING PROFORMA HAS NOT BEENPAGINATED. (2)Non-filing of affidavit properlyexecuted-PAGINATION OF


DOCUMENTS HAS NOT BEEN DONE. (3)Nonfiling of application for exemption from filingOfficial Translation, with affidavit And courtfee.-PARA NO.2 IS NOT PROPER AS ONLY ONEANNEXURE HAS BEEN FILED ALONGWITH SLP.(4)Improper execution of vakalatnama/Memo ofAppearance.-BLANKS BE COMPLETED.VAKALATNAMA AND MEMO OF APPEARANCEARE UNDATED.TRANSLATION OF JAIL STAMPHAS NOT BEEN DONE.(5)Non-mentioning OF the number of days ofdelay, with affidavit and court fee.-ALSORELATIONSHIP OF PAIROKAR OF PETITIONERWITHPETITIONER DIFFERS WITH AFFIDAVIT, PARANO. 3 IS MISSING. (6)Other-ANN.P.1 - YEAR OFCASE NO. IS INCORRECT, PARA NO.40, 52, 63,66 AND 67 ARE MISSING. (7)Non-filing of copy ofthe judgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/Gos/Appendix/lettersdated.........etc.-EXHIBITS. (8)Non inclusion ofcomplete listing proforma filled in, signed in thepaper-books.-COL.NOS.7(A)(D)(E) AND 10 BE COMPLETEDPROPERLY. (9)Other-PAGE K - YEAR OF SESSIONCASE NO. DIFFERS, ALSO IN INDEX.(10)Other-PRAYER 8(A) OF SLP IS INCOMPLETE(PARTICULARS OF TRIAL COURT HAVE NOTBEEN GIVEN) (11)Non filing of Copy ofsurrender proof/CUSTODY CERTIFICATE inrespect of all convicts.- (12)Other-COPIES OFCUSTODY CERTIFICATE ANDVAKALATNAMA ARE REQUIRED TO BEINCLUDED IN PAPER BOOKS.

[DEFAULT / OTHER MATTERS]

4 Diary No. 12290-2017XI

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. VINAY GARG

VersusM/S. VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED AURA & CO.[Caveat]IA No.55414/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.55415/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T.***ONLY OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT WILL BELISTED BEFORE THE HON'BLE JUDGE INCHAMBERS ON 30.07.2018***IA No. 55414/2017 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILINGIA No. 55415/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

5 Diary No. 12744-2017II

KAMLESH ATISHI DIPANKAR

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

6 Diary No. 13828-2017IV-A

RAMESHWAR DAYAL AND ANR. FUZAIL AHMAD AYYUBI

VersusSUMERCHAND . AND ORS.


7 Diary No. 16655-2017II-A

SRI MADAN MOHAN TRIPATHI AND ORS. NEERAJ SHEKHAR

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.(1)Other-MATTER IS INCOMPLETE SINCEANNEXURES ARE NOT FILED, INDEX IS NOTDONE. MATTER WILL BE RECHECKED LATERON.

8 Diary No. 18288-2017II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH PRADEEP MISRA[P-1]

VersusNEETU SINGH(1)Non Mentioning of capacity of executant forsigning of vakalatnama-STAMP NOT CLEAR(2)Non-Mentioning inpetitions/appeal of statement In terms of orderXXI RULE 3/ORDER XXII RULE 2 of SupremeCourt Rules. (Whether petitioner has filed anypetitionAgainst the impugned order/Judgment earlier,and if so, the result thereof stated). ).-RULE NOTMENTIONED ON COVER PAGES. (3)Copyof FIR/translated copy of FIR not filed. (In case ofanticipatory bail/stay of arrest)-FIR COPYREQUIRED. (4)Non Mentioning ofpage numbers of annexures in the list of dates/inpetition.-ANNEX. P1 (5)Other-EXIBITSMENTIONED IN I/O REQUIRED.(6)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-PARA2 OF AFFIDAVIT IS BLANK. (7)Non-filing oftranslation of vernaculardocument(s).-TRANSLATED COPY OF ANNEX. P1NOT FILED. (8)Non filing of FIR format.-DIARYNO. NOT MENTIONED IN FIRFORMAT. (9)Other-PAGE NUMBERING OFAPPENDIX AND ANNEX P1 NOT TALLY WITHINDEX.

9 Diary No. 24477-2017II

DINESH KUMAR SHUKLA GAUTAM AWASTHI

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.

10 Diary No. 27580-2017XVI

PANCHU GOPAL HALDER (D THR LR) AND ORS. RANJAN MUKHERJEE

VersusATUL KRISNA CHOWDHURY AND ORS. RESHMI REA SINHA[caveat],

[R-1]ORD is to be listed before Hon'ble Judge inChamber

11 Diary No. 33807-2017IX

DIWAKAR SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.(1)Non-filing of application for condonation ofdelay in time barred Petition/Appeal.-WITHCOURT FEE, AFFIDAVIT, OR ON LIMITATION INGREEN SHEET ETC. (2)Non-bearing of Signatureof the Counsel / Party-In-Person inpetition/application-SLP NOT SIGNED


(3)Other-PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF NOTMENTIONED ON COVER PAGE. (4)Other-TOTALPAGE NUMBER MENTIONED WRONGLYIN AFFIDAVIT. (5)Other-NAME OF BOTH HIGHCOURT JUEGES TO BE MENTIONED IN LISTINGPROFORMA. (6)Other-DATE OFANNX. P-3 IS WRONG IN LIST OF DATES.(7)Other-PAGES 3 AND 4 NOT PLACEDPROPERLY IN ONE PAPER BOOK MARKED AS(X)

12 Diary No. 35680-2017IX

SAYYED HUSSAIN SAYYED CHAND SINCEDECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND ORS.VersusAMINABI SHAIKH ABDUL RAHMAN SINCEDECEASED THROUGH HER LRS AND ORS.

BALRAJ DEWAN[caveat]

(1)Other-PAGINATION OF NOTESHEET IS NOTGIVEN IN INDEXAND PAGINATION OF P-5 ISNOT PROPERLY DONE IN P-5 YEAR OF CASE NOOF P-5 ISWRONG AND PAGE 55 ISHAVINGUNDERLINING(2)Non-filing of affidavit properlyexecuted-CAUSETITLE IS WRONG IN AFF ANDPET NO IS NOTGIVEN AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS PET IS NOTGIVEN (3)Improper execution ofvakalatnama/Memo of Appearance.-FULL NAMEIS NOT GIVENAGAINST SIG/THUMB IMPRESSION TO BECHECKED (4)Memo of parties has not been filed.-(5)Other-CIVIL REV NO OFP-7 IS WRONG AND L/P IS UNSIGNED (6)Causetitle of the petition/appeal not corresponding tothat of the impugned judgment and names ofparties therein.-

13 Diary No. 36311-2017(SCLSC) II-A

ANANT @ RAKESH RATAN LET. NITIN KUMAR THAKUR

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA(1)Other-F/M NOT REQUIRED IN PAPER BOOKS(2)Other-SL. NO. 19 TO 21 NOT PAGINATED ININDEX(3)Other-PAGES 38 TO 97 TO BE REPLACED(4)Other-PAGE 2 AND 16 OF I/ORDER MISSING(5)Other-PAGES 1 TO 16 TO BE REPLACED(6)Other-DELAY DAYS NOT MENTIONED INAPPLICATION FOR CONDONATION(7)Other-FORMAT OF FIR DETAILS NOT FILED(8)Other-LISTING PROFORMA NOT FILED(9)Other-GREEN L/R REQUIRED (10)Non filing ofapplication for exemption from filing separateproof of surrender whereproof of surrender/separate certificate from thejail Authority not filed.-

14 Diary No. 39246-2017XIV

DULAL MIAH@DULAL SK SATYAJEET KUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

15 Diary No. 4155-2017IX

OSMAN KHAN (D) THR LRS AAJAM S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY


VersusPATHAN KHAN (D) THR LRS AND ORS. NAR HARI SINGH[caveat]IA No.135049/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

16 Diary No. 13493-2018II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. ABHISHEK

VersusRAMZAN ALI(1)Other-ANNEXURES NOT FILED. INCOMPLETEMATTER. TO BE RECHECKED.

17 Diary No. 13840-2018PIL-W

SWAMI AGNIVESH SUDHA GUPTA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.(1)Other-INDEX IS INCOMPLETE (2)Noninclusion of complete listing proforma filled in,signed in thepaper-books.-COL 6 NOT FILLED IN THE L.P(3)No clarification as to maintainability of writpetition (where SLP/CA already filed/dispose of.-PL CLARIFY THE AS EARLIERMATTER W.P 1181/17 DISPOSED OF BY THISCOURT.PL CLARIFY THE MAINTAINABILITY OFTHE WRIT PETITION(4)Non Mentioning of page numbers of annexuresin the list of dates/in petition.- (5)Non-Mentioning inpetitions/appeal of statement In terms of orderXXI RULE 3/ORDER XXII RULE 2 of SupremeCourt Rules. (Whether petitioner has filed anypetitionAgainst the impugned order/Judgment earlier,and if so, the result thereof stated). ).- (6)Non-filing of copy of thejudgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/Gos/Appendix/letters dated.........etc.-COPY OFTHE ACT MENTIONED IN PRAYER IV ISREQUIRED(7)Other-PAGE NO OF L/DATES WRONGLYMENTIONED IN THE AFFIDAVIT (8)Non-Mentioning in Para 1A of writ petition regardingpetitioner having approached the Concernedauthority/respondents/ alongwith copy ofapplications/ representation and outcome.-(9)Other-COPY OF I.D PROOF OF THEPETITIONER IS REQUIRED

18 Diary No. 15961-2018II

NEERAJ RAJBHAR ANZU. K. VARKEY

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.(1)Other-THE ANNEX. MARKED IN LIST OFDATES DIFFER FROM ANNEX. FILED ANDTHERE ARE 2 ANNEX. MARKED IN LIST OFDATES BUT FILED ONLYONE ANNEX. AND THE SAME IS DIFFERENTFROM MARKED ANNEX. HENCE MATTER IS TOBE RECHECKED LATER ON.

19 Diary No. 16073-2018PIL-W

NIDHI BOBAL AND ANR. FUZAIL AHMAD AYYUBI


VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.(1)Non-filing of copy of thejudgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/Gos/Appendix/letters dated.........etc.-APPENDIXNOT FILED.(2)Incorrect numbering of paragraphs andpagination of paper books and description inIndex.-PARA 2 1ST PARA 1 QUOTE TO BECLARIFIED. (3)Other-TYPE OF WRIT NOTMENTIONED IN PRAYER (4)Other-IF MATTER ISFILED UNDER PIL. REQUIREMENTSAS PER SHEET ATTACHED HEREWITH REQUIRETO BE FURNISHED. (5)Incomplete/INCORRECTaddresses/STATUS of the parties and theirrepresentatives.-REPRESENTATION OF R NO 2NOT GIV EN IN C/T OF W.P

20 Diary No. 16630-2018II-A

MOHD. JAVED SHAKEEL AHMED

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.(1)Incorrect numbering of paragraphs andpagination of paper books and description inIndex.-PAGE NOS. OF APPLICATION FOREXEMPTIONO/T MENTIONED WRONGLY IN INDEX. (2)Pageno. ...... not clear / legible-ILLEGIBLE WORDMENTIONED AT PAGE NO. 23. BLANK AT PAGENO.23, 24, 25. (3)Non-filing of affidavit properlyexecuted-PAGE NOS. OF LIST OF DATESMENTIONED WRONGLY IN AFFIDAVIT.(4)Non filing of application for exemption fromFiling certified copy of the impugnedjudgment/order.-NEITHER C/COPY OF I/ORDERNOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/COPY HAS BEEN FILED. (5)Memo ofparties has not been filed.-MEMO OF PARTIESHAS NOTBEEN FILED. C/T TO BE CHECKED LATER ON.(6)Non-mentioning OF the number of days ofdelay, with affidavit and court fee.-THEPETITION IS TIME BARRED APPLICATION FORC/DELAY IN FILING SLP IS REQUIRED WITHAFFIDAVIT. GREEN L/R IS REQUIRED IN PAPERBOOKS.(7)Other-FIR NO. AND DATE NOT MENTIONEDIN ANNEXURE P-1 ITSELF. (8)Other-DATE OFANNEXURE P-3 TO P-5 NOTMENTIONED IN INDEX. (9)Other-DESCRIPTIONOF ANNEXURE P-3 AND P-4 INCOMPLETE ININDEX. (10)Other-COPY OF CASENO. 6094/11. (11)Other-FIR NO. MENTIONEDWRONGLY IN COL. NO. 7 (B) AND DATE NOTMENTIONED. COL. 7 (E) NOT MENTIONED ASPERAMENDED L/PROFORMA. (12)Other-CASE NO.NOT MENTIONED IN PRAYER FOR INTERIMRELIEF. (13)Other-PAGE NOS. NOTMENTIONED AGAINST SI. NO. 18 TO 20 ININDEX. (14)Other-FIR FORMAT TO BE REMOVEDFROM PAPER BOOKS.


21 Diary No. 16692-2018II

DIGVIJAYNATH SHARMA MANJU JETLEY

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN(1)Other-NAME OF THE COUNSEL IS REQUIREDON COVER PAGE (2)Other-PAGES OFANNEXURES NOT MENTIONED IN L/D.(3)Other-BLANK IN PRAYER OF SLP (4)Other-BLANK AT PAGE 22 (5)Other-CERTIFICATE ISINCORRECT (6)Other-VAKALTNAMA BEIDENTIFIED/CORRECTED (7)Non filing ofapplication for exemption from filing OfficialTranslation, with affidavit And court fee.-PRAYERBLANK (8)Other-FIR FORMAT NOT FILED(9)Other-ANNEXURE P-1 IS UNDATED (10)Other-DATE OF ANNEXURE P-4 NOT TALLY (11)Memoof parties hasnot been filed.-RESPONDENT ADDRESS (12)Non-mentioning OF the number of days of delay, withaffidavit and courtfee.-GREEN L/R REQUIRED (13)Other-PPRAYER8(D) NOT SET OUT PROPERLY

22 Diary No. 16942-2018(SCLSC) II-A

RAM CHANDRA RAI SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND(1)Non Mentioning of page numbers of annexuresin the list of dates/in petition.- (2)Page no. ......not clear /legible-PAGE NOS. 1 TO 11, 45 TO 59 ARE SMALLFONT AND NOT CLEAR. (3)Non-bearing ofSignature of the Counsel / Party-In-Person inpetition/application-BOTH APPLICATIONS ARENOT SIGNEDBY THE ADVOCATE. (4)Non-filing ofaffidavit properlyexecuted-AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER/ PAIROKARIN SUPPORT OF THE PETITION/ LIST OF DATES/APPLICATIONS/ ANNEXURES NOT FILED.(5)Improper execution of vakalatnama/Memo ofAppearance.-ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF JAILAUTHORITY IS REQUIRED. V/A IS NOTIDENTIFIED/ CERTIFIED/ SATISFIED BY THEADVOCATE. FRESH V/A IS REQUIRED. (6)Other-NAME OF THE HIGH COURT AND BENCH NOTMENTIONED.(7)Incomplete/INCORRECT addresses/STATUS ofthe parties and their representatives.-ADDRESSOF RESPONDENT IS INCOMPLETE.(8)Non-mentioning OF the number of days ofdelay, with affidavit and court fee.-DAYS OFDELAY TO BE CORRECTED IN APPLICATIONANDO/R LIMITATION. GREEN L/R NOT FILED INPAPER BOOKS.(9)Annexures..............referred toin the petition not true copies of the documentsbefore the court below/ annexures not inchronological order as per list of dates.-APPENDIX AND ANNEXURES ARE NOTCERTIFIED AS TRUE COPIES


BY AOR. (10)Date(s) of annexures............notgiven.-DATE OF ANNEXURE P-1 NOTMENTIONED IN INDEX.(11)Other-ANNEXURE P-2 NOT CAPTIONPROPERLY IN INDEX AND DATE OF SAIDANNEXURE IS NOT TALLYING. (12)Non-filing ofCopies of the orders of the Trial Court/FirstAppellate Court in case of SLP filed against RSA.-EXHIBITS MENTIONED IN I/ORDER REQUIRED.(13)Other-ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF CUSTODYCERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED AND INCLUDED INPAPER BOOKS (FRESH CUSTODY CERTIFICATEISREQUIRED). (14)Other-ORDER AND RULE NOTMENTIONED IN 1ST PAGE OF SLP AND COVERPAGE OF PAPER BOOKS.(15)Other-PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF NOTPROPER. (16)Non inclusion of complete listingproforma filled in, signed inthe paper-books.-COL. 4 (A) (B), 6 TO BE FILLEDIN L/P. (17)Other-LETTER MENTIONED ININDEX BUT NOT FILED.(18)Other-PAGE NOS. NOT MENTIONEDAGAINST S. NO. 17 TO 21 IN INDEX. (19)Nonfiling of FIR format.-

23 Diary No. 17000-2018II-C

DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OFENFORCEMENT DEPUTY DIRECTOR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusAYESHA SHERIFF AND ORS.(1)Non mentioning of date of filing/drawn by.-(2)Non-affixation of Welfare Stamp.- (3)Improperexecution of vakalatnama/Memo of Appearance.-C/T TO BE GIVEN CORRECTLY. M/A ISUNDATED. SIGNED TO BE CLARIFIED.(4)Nonfiling ofapplication for exemption from Filing certifiedcopy of the impugned judgment/order.-(5)Incomplete/INCORRECT addresses/STATUS ofthe parties and their representatives.-STATUSBEFORE TRIAL COURT HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN.(6)Non-filing of application for condonationof delay in time barred Petition/Appeal.-JURIISDICTION IS INCORRECT IN DELAY.(7)Annexures..............referred to in thepetition not true copies of the documents beforethe court below/ annexures not in chronologicalorder as per list of dates.-I/O, APPENDIX,P-3 NOT SIGNED AS TRUE COPIES. (8)Caseno(s). of annexures not given.-P-4 (9)Non-filing ofcopy of thejudgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/Gos/Appendix/letters dated.........etc.-ORDERDATED 13.3.17 IN WP 5962/16, PROVISION OFPMLANOT BEEN FILED. (10)Non inclusion of completelisting proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-COL.7, L/P NOT SIGNED AND ISUNDATED, REGN. NO. AND EMAIL I/O OF LD.AOR ARE MISSING. (11)Page no. ...... not clear /legible-PAGE H - MISSING DATE OF ANNEX.


P-3 DIFFERS. (12)Page no. ...... not clear / legible-PAGE 25 SUB PARA (E) IS MISSING. (13)Nonfiling of FIRformat.-

24 Diary No. 17075-2018II-C

NATCHIMUTH JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICETHENNILAI KARUR DISTRICT AND ANR.(1)Other-PETITION IS TIME BARRED. DELAYDAYS BE FILLED BOTH IN APPLICATION ANDO/R ON LIMITATION IN GREEN SHEET INP/BOOKS(2)Other-ANNEXTURES MARKED IN LIST OFDATES...(PAGE NO.NOT MENTIONED WITHINBRACKET) (3)Other-ALL ANNEXTURESDIM IMPRESSION. MAY BE REPLACED BYBETTER COPY. (4)Other-MAY BE RE-CHECKED.REPLACE ALL ANNEXTURES.

25 Diary No. 17109-2018(SCLSC) II-C

SULTAN @ RAJESH LAXMI ARVIND

VersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI(1)Non filing of brief list of dates/events.-PAGENOS. OF ANNEXURE P-1 NOT CORRECT IN LISTOF DATES. (2)PagesNo..........containunderlines/highlights/Blanks/torn condition.-SOME BLANK IN PARA 6 OF SLP AT PAGE 37.(3)Memo of parties hasnot been filed.-MEMO OF PARTIES HAS NOTBEEN FILED. HENCE C/T TO BE CHECKEDLATER ON. (4)Other-DATE OF I/O NOTMENTIONED IN L/R. (5)Other-FIR DETAILS ISNOT FILED. (6)Other-DATE OF I/ORDER NOTCORRECT IN LISTINGPROFORMA. (7)Non-filing of application forcondonation of delay in time barredPetition/Appeal.-THE WORD CRL. M.P. NO. NOTMENTIONED IN TOP OF APPLICATION. PARASNO. NOT IN SEQUENCE IN APPLICATION.

26 Diary No. 17138-2018II-C

BHOOP SINGH BALRAJ DEWAN

VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH(1)Incorrect numbering of paragraphs andpagination of paper books and description inIndex.-INDEX IS INCOMPLETE . PAGENUMBERING NOTDONE. (2)Other-INCOMPLETE MATTER, NOTANNEXURES FILED, MATTER RE-CHECKEDAFTER FILING ANNEXURES.

27 Diary No. 17196-2018II-A

LAXMI @ CHHOTELAL AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA

VersusTHE STATE OF M.P.(1)Other-ANNEX. NOT FILED, INCOMPLETEMATTER, TO BE RECHECKED.


28 Diary No. 17856-2018II

AMIT PRASAD AND ANR. SHAKEEL AHMED

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.(1)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-BLANKS (2)Other-SYNOPSIS NOT FILED(3)Date(s) ofannexures............not given.-P-2 (4)Non-Filing ofMemo of Parties, as detailed cause title not givenin the impugnedjudgment.- (5)Non-filing of application forcondonation of delay in time barredPetition/Appeal.-NOT FILED(6)Annexures..............referred to in the petitionnot true copies of the documents before the courtbelow/ annexures not inchronological order as per list of dates.-TRUECOPY (7)Other-COPY OF COMPLAINT CASE57/208 REQUIRED (8)Noninclusion of complete listing proforma filled in,signed in the paper-books.-ALL COLUMNS(9)Other-BLANK INPARA 4 OF SLP(10)Other-ANNEXURE P-1 AND P-2 NOTMARKED IN LIST OF DATES (11)Particulars ofthe impugned judgments not uniformlywritten in all the documents.-COVER PAGE OFPAPER BOOKS

29 Diary No. 18113-2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSAMSUNG ELECTRONICS INDIA ELECTRONICS LTD. SYED JAFAR

ALAM[caveat][caveat]OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT

30 Diary No. 4815-2018II

CHINTAPALLI SAMBASIVA RAO K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

VersusKUKKA JAGAN MOHAN RAO AND ANR.(1)Other-PAGE NOS. NOT MENTIONED WITHANNEXURES IN LIST OF DATES. (2)Other-AFFIDAVIT HAS BLANK.(3)Other-ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENTS AREINCOMPLETE. (4)Other-STATUS OF THE TRIALCOURT NOT MENTIONED IN C/TOF SLP. (5)Other-DAYS OF DELAY TO BECORRECTED. (6)Other-RELEVANT EXHIBITSMENTIONED IN I/ORDER REQUIRED.(7)Other-APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING NOT FILED. (8)Other-COL. 7 (A)TO (E) TO BE FILLEDPROPERLY/ CORRECTLY AND COL. 7 (E) NOTMENTIONED AS PER AMENDED L/PROFORMA.(9)Other-FIR FORMAT NOT FILED.(10)Other-MEMO OF PARTIES TO BE REMOVEDFROM PAPER BOOKS. (11)Other-CORRECTIONDONE AT PAGE NO. 40 INORIGINAL BUT NOT APPEARING IN PAPERBOOKS.

31 Diary No. 5947-2018II

B. MALLIKARJUNA VIPIN NAIR

Versus


THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR.(1)Other PAGINATION OF ANNEX. P-2 AND P-3TO BE CORRECTED IN INDEX AND LIST OFDATES. (2)Other H/C ADV. NAME AND ADDRESSOF RESPONDENT TO BEGIVEN. (3)Other COL.7 TO BE FILLED IN L/P.AND NOT SIGNED.(4)Non-filing of affidavitproperly executedC/T OF RESPONDENT TO BE CORRECTED.(5)Memo of parties has not been filed. C/T TO BECHECKED. C/T OF BOTH MATTERS TO BEGIVEN.(6)Nonfiling of office report on limitation with causetitle on Green/White Sheet. (7)Non filing of FIRformat.

32 Diary No. 6251-2018PIL-W

S.KANNAN JOGY SCARIA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.(1)Non inclusion of complete listing proformafilled in, signed in the paper-books.-COL. 2(A),NAME OF RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 4 IN COL.3(A) ETC. ARE WRONG, COL.4(A) AND (B) ARENOT FILLED. (2)Incomplete/INCORRECTaddresses/STATUS of the parties and theirrepresentatives.-ADDRESS OF RESPONDENT NO.5 IS INCOMPLETE. RESPONDENT NOS. 2 AND 3SEEMS TO BE SAME.(3)Other-FACTS AREMENTIONED IN W.P. AND ANNEXURES ARE NOTMARKED IN W.P. ALSO. (4)Other-PARA 6 OFW.P. TO BE MENTIONED BEFORE GROUNDS.(5)Other-PRAYER A OF W.P. SEEMS TO BEINCOMPLETE. (6)Non-filing of affidavit properlyexecuted-DATE OFVERIFICATION IS BLANK, PAGE NUMBER OFLIST OF DATES NOT PROPERLY MENTIONED.(7)Other-PAGE NOS. NOT MENTIONED AGAINSTSERIAL NOS.32 AND 33 IN INDEX. (8)Other-INDEX FORRECORD OF PROCEEDINGS TO BE REPLACED INPAPER BOOK. (9)Other-IT ISMENTIONED IN PARA 3 OF W.P. THAT THEPETITIONER IS SETTLED IN AUSTRALIA BUTADDRESS MENTIONED IN W.P. AND AFFIDAVITIS LOCAL ADDRESS. CLARIFY.(10)Other-PARA 7 OF W.P. IS NOT AS PER PILGUIDELINES. (11)Writ not filed in terms ofORDER XXXVIII SCR, 2013 if it isfiled as PIL.-(PIL GUIDELINES ATTACHED)

33 Diary No. 7028-2018II

R.LAKSHMANACHARY K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

VersusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA(1)Other-CIT IN PETITIONERS CORRECTED ASETC.ETC. INSTEAD OF ORS. (2)Other-ANNEXTURE P-21.....DATE......INDEXAND DOCUMENT NOT TALLY (3)Other-TRIALCOURT ORDER IS OF YEAR 2009. ACCUSED AREON BAIL ALL THESE YEARS (CLARIFY)


(4)Other-APPLICATION EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING. SENTENCE CONFIRMED BYHIGH COURT BUT IN PRAYER PORTION CLAUSE(A) SESSION COURTPARTICULARS QUOTED (CLARIFY) (5)Other-FIRFORMAT NOT FILED. (6)Other-ENSURE PROPERCOMPLIANCE OFDECLARATION. CHECK ALL THREE P/BOOKS(NOT A DEFECT)

34 Diary No. 7583-2018PIL-W

EDWIN PINTO JASMEET SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF GOA AND ORS.(1)Non inclusion of complete listing proformafilled in, signed in the paper-books.-ALLCOLUMNS NOT FILLED.(2)Other-EXCEPT ANNEX. P-1 OTHERANNEXURE I.E. ANNEX. P-2 ONWARDS NOTFILED AS MENTIONED IN PETITION. MATTERTO BE RECHECKED.

35 Diary No. 8679-2018XI-A

THE STATE OF ODISHA AND ANR. SHIBASHISH MISRA

VersusHRUSHIKESH MISHRA AND ORS. TEJASWI KUMAR

PRADHAN[caveat](1)Other-PARA NO-3 .....OF SLP.....DATE OFORDER INCORRECT (2)Other-PETITION IS TIMEBARRED. DELAY DAYS BEFILLED BOTH IN APPLICATION AND O/R ONLIMITATION IN GREEN SHEET IN P/BOOKS(3)Other-ENSURE PROPER COMPLIANCE OFDECLARATION.CHECK ALL THREE P/BOOKS ( NOT A DEFECT)

NEW DELHI05-09-2018 18:17:46



IN THE CHAMBERS OFHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 06-09-2018HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR(TIME : 1:45 PM)

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent1001 Diary No. 26619-2018

XIVSUNITA RAJPUT

VersusSUSHEELA DEVI SAINI AND ORS.IN SLP(C) No. - 35430/2017,IA No. 99950/2018 - APPLICATION FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING TYPED COPIES OFANNEXURESIA No. 99943/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING REVIEW PETITIONIA No. 99944/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS

NEW DELHI04-09-2018 16:08:08



IN THE CHAMBERS OFHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 06-09-2018HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

(TIME : 1:30 PM)


XVANITA SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.IN SLP(C) No. - 3193/2018,IA No. 45908/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING REVIEW PETITION

1002 Diary No. 24763-2018XIV

ANGESH KUMAR AND ORS.

VersusUNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANR.IN C.A. No. - 6159/2013, IN C.A. No. - 6160/2013,IN C.A. No. - 6161/2013, IN C.A. No. - 6162/2013,IA No. 91084/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING REVIEW PETITION

1003 R.P.(C) No.2629-2630/2018 in C.A.No. 23512-23513/2017XVII

M/S EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED

VersusAFTAB SINGHIN C.A. No. - 23512/2017, IN C.A. No. -23513/2017,

1004 Diary No. 7355-2018XIV

RAJ SINGH

VersusGHASITA RAM AND ORS.IN SLP(C) No. - 25906/2017, IN SLP(C) No. -25907/2017,

1005 R.P.(Crl.) No. 424/2018in SLP(Crl) No.5876/2017II

MISHARI LAL ALIAS MISA RAM

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHANIN SLP(Crl) No. - 5876/2017,

NEW DELHI04-09-2018 16:08:22



IN THE CHAMBERS OFHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 06-09-2018HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

(TIME : 1:35 PM)

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent1001 R.P.(C) No. 2555/2018

in SLP(C) No.14312/2018XI-A

PETER JOHN (D) THROUGH LRS AND ORS.

VersusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.IN SLP(C) No. - 14312/2018,

1002 R.P.(C) No. 2591/2018in SLP(C) No.10381/2018XI-A

ANTO AUGUSTINE

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.IN SLP(C) No. - 10381/2018,

NEW DELHI04-09-2018 16:08:35



IN THE CHAMBERS OFHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 06-09-2018HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA

(TIME : 1:40 PM)


II-APRAHLAD SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.IN SLP(Crl) No. - 934/2018,IA No. 92752/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING REVIEW PETITIONIA No. 92755/2018 - EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERINGIA No. 92761/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS

NEW DELHI04-09-2018 16:09:22

Date post:	06-Sep-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	vuongngoc
View:	240 times
Download:	2 times

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & … · vakalatnama and memo of appearance are...

Documents