+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Surface Architecture in Endometrial Tuberculosis

Surface Architecture in Endometrial Tuberculosis

Date post: 30-Dec-2016
Category:
Upload: alka
View: 213 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
2
Images in Gynecologic Surgery Surface Architecture in Endometrial Tuberculosis Atul Kumar, MS*, and Alka Kumar, MS From the Hysteroscopic Surgery Division, Women’s Health Centre, Jaipur, India (both authors). DISCUSS You can discuss this article with its authors and with other AAGL members at http://www.AAGL.org/jmig-21-4-JMIG-D-14-00035 Use your Smartphone to scan this QR code and connect to the discussion forum for this article now* * Download a free QR Code scanner by searching for ‘‘QR scanner’’ in your smartphone’s app store or app marketplace. Endometrial tuberculosis is a frequent cause of infer- tility, and its detection is often difficult. A 29-year-old woman with a 5-year history of primary infertility and scanty periods was referred for hysteroscopic evaluation. The endometrial thickness was 7 mm at vaginal ultrasound. Panoramic hysteroscopy with 1! magnification using a conventional telescope (27005 BA; Karl Storz GmbH & Co., Tuttlingen, Germany) [1] revealed an endometrium un- remarkable except for subtle scarring, which could also be overlooked (Fig. 1). The endometrium was next visualized using a Hamou Micro-Hysteroscope II (26157 BT; Karl Storz) [1–5] in the panoramic view at 20! at-source magnification, which revealed a rough-looking endome- trium as though it had been sprinkled with a coarse whitish powder (Fig. 2, A and B). The endometrial surface was bumpy, with diffusely scattered small conical papillary pro- jections, and no endometrial glands were observed (Fig. 2, A and B). The apex of a papillary projection located in the center of the frame (Fig. 2B) seemed to have been nibbled by a mouse, and the nibbled circular rim was impregnated with white caseous-like micro deposits. Visu- alization in the contact mode using 80! at-source magnifi- cation further revealed those micro deposits, which were missed during the 20! panoramic visualization (Fig. 3). A targeted biopsy specimen was obtained from the region of the diseased endometrium, and the diagnosis of tubercu- losis was established via polymerase chain reaction [3,4,6]. Histopathology revealed an endometrium with epitheloid granulomas. Usually granulomas take up to 2 weeks to develop over the pars functionalis, which is shed every 4 weeks [7], and this could be why the tubercular micro deposits were not able to fully develop over the endometrial surface to a size sufficient to be visible at 1! magnification and why the deposits were observed only at 20! at-source magnifi- cation (Fig. 2, A and B). We have observed such images in other cases of endometrial tuberculosis, and such appear- ance is pathognomonic of the disease. In the present study the magnified peculiar bumpy endometrial surface architec- ture observed in the panoramic mode by placing the Fig. 1 Visualization under 1! magnification reveals an almost unremarkable endometrium. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Corresponding author: Atul Kumar, MS, Hysteroscopic Surgery Division, Women’s Health Centre, 11 Rathore Nagar, Queens Rd, Viashali Nagar, Jai- pur 302021, India. E-mail: [email protected] Submitted January 21, 2014. Accepted for publication January 21, 2014. Available at www.sciencedirect.com and www.jmig.org 1553-4650/$ - see front matter Ó 2014 AAGL. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.020
Transcript

Images in Gynecologic Surgery

Surface Architecture in Endometrial Tuberculosis

Atul Kumar, MS*, and Alka Kumar, MSFrom the Hysteroscopic Surgery Division, Women’s Health Centre, Jaipur, India (both authors).

DISCUSS

The authors decla

Corresponding au

Women’s Health

pur 302021, India

E-mail: alkaatul@

Submitted Januar

Available at www

1553-4650/$ - se

http://dx.doi.org/1

You can discuss this article with its authors and with other AAGL members athttp://www.AAGL.org/jmig-21-4-JMIG-D-14-00035

Fig. 1

Visualization under 1! magnifi

endometrium.

re no conflicts of interest.

thor: Atul Kumar, MS, Hysteroscopic Surgery Division,

Centre, 11 Rathore Nagar, Queens Rd, Viashali Nagar, Jai-

.

sancharnet.in

y 21, 2014. Accepted for publication January 21, 2014.

.sciencedirect.com and www.jmig.org

e front matter � 2014 AAGL. All rights reserved.

0.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.020

Utoadth

cation reveals an a

se your Smartphonescan this QR code

nd connect to theiscussion forum foris article now*

* Download a free QR Code scanner by searching for ‘‘QRscanner’’ in your smartphone’s app store or app marketplace.

lmost unremarkable

Endometrial tuberculosis is a frequent cause of infer-tility, and its detection is often difficult. A 29-year-oldwoman with a 5-year history of primary infertility andscanty periods was referred for hysteroscopic evaluation.The endometrial thickness was 7 mm at vaginal ultrasound.Panoramic hysteroscopy with 1! magnification using aconventional telescope (27005 BA; Karl Storz GmbH &Co., Tuttlingen, Germany) [1] revealed an endometrium un-remarkable except for subtle scarring, which could also beoverlooked (Fig. 1). The endometrium was next visualizedusing a Hamou Micro-Hysteroscope II (26157 BT; KarlStorz) [1–5] in the panoramic view at 20! at-sourcemagnification, which revealed a rough-looking endome-trium as though it had been sprinkled with a coarse whitishpowder (Fig. 2, A and B). The endometrial surface wasbumpy, with diffusely scattered small conical papillary pro-jections, and no endometrial glands were observed (Fig. 2,A and B). The apex of a papillary projection located inthe center of the frame (Fig. 2B) seemed to have beennibbled by a mouse, and the nibbled circular rim wasimpregnated with white caseous-like micro deposits. Visu-alization in the contact mode using 80! at-source magnifi-cation further revealed those micro deposits, which weremissed during the 20! panoramic visualization (Fig. 3).A targeted biopsy specimen was obtained from the regionof the diseased endometrium, and the diagnosis of tubercu-

losis was established via polymerase chain reaction [3,4,6].Histopathology revealed an endometrium with epitheloidgranulomas.

Usually granulomas take up to 2 weeks to develop overthe pars functionalis, which is shed every 4 weeks [7], andthis could be why the tubercular micro deposits were notable to fully develop over the endometrial surface to asize sufficient to be visible at 1! magnification and whythe deposits were observed only at 20! at-source magnifi-cation (Fig. 2, A and B). We have observed such images inother cases of endometrial tuberculosis, and such appear-ance is pathognomonic of the disease. In the present studythe magnified peculiar bumpy endometrial surface architec-ture observed in the panoramic mode by placing the

Fig. 2

(A) Visualization under 20! at-source magnification shows a rough, bumpy endometrium with multiple micro conical projections. (B) The apex of a

conical projection in the center of the frame seems to have been nibbled by a mouse and the nibbled circular rim is impregnated with caseous-like micro

deposits.

2 Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Vol -, No -, -/- 2014

endoscope tip close to the endometrium was critically vitalin suspecting the disease. The patient was given anti-tuberculosis therapy, and substantial improvement wasobserved in the menstrual flow within 5 months of treat-ment.

In the present context, at-source magnification relatesto magnification provided by the optics of the Hamou

Fig. 3

A micro deposit seen in the contact mode using 80! at-source magni-

fication.

Micro-Hysteroscope II and is not provided by the zoom-ing apparatus of the video camera, and it can becompared with the at-source magnification provided bythe objective lens of a conventional compound micro-scope [1].

We believe that visualization with at-source magnifica-tion helps in raising suspicion of endometrial tuberculosisat hysteroscopy.

References

1. Hamou JE, Taylor PJ, Sciarra JJ. The optical basis for and principals of

endoscopic instruments. In: Hamou JE, editor. Hysteroscopy and Micro-

colpohysteroscopy: Text and Atlas. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange;

1991. p. 18.

2. Kumar A, Kumar A. Microcolpohysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Lap-

arosc. 2004;11:131–132.

3. Kumar A, Kumar A. Intraluminal tubal adhesions. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:

434–435.

4. Kumar A, Kumar A. Relook hysteroscopy after antitubercular therapy.

Fertil Steril. 2008;89:701–702.

5. Kumar A, Kumar A. A successful break-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;

197:685.

6. Kumar A, Kumar A. Unusual appearing tubercular deposits at hysteros-

copy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:144.

7. Sherman ME, Mazur MT, Kurman RJ. Benign diseases of the endome-

trium. In: Kurman RJ, editor. Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female

Genital Tract: A Textbook. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2002.

p. 180.


Recommended