Surfaces and Interfaces 1
Surfaces, Interfaces, and Layered Devices
Building blocks for nanodevices!
W. Pauli: “God made solids, but surfaces were the work of Devil.”
Surfaces and Interfaces 2
Schematic representation of the potential landscape in a finite crystal, which gets modified close to the surface.
Surface states (S) may result, with typical energies inside the gap between the valence band (VB) and the conduction band (CB)
Interface between a crystal and vacuum
Surfaces and Interfaces 3
Surface states emerge from the conduction and valence band since the total number of states is conserved.
Surface states are usually partly filled, so the chemical potential is located within the surface band. Hence, the energy bands get bended and the Fermi level gets pinned – utmost important for semiconductor heterostructures. To find energies and wave functions one should solve the Schrödinger equation in a realistic potential, which often has to be found in a self-consistent way – generally difficult!
1D chain of 10 atoms.
The surface states are split from other N-2 states, their energies turn out to be larger than those of bulk states
Surfaces and Interfaces 4
Energy of surface states in the one-dimensional Shockley model, shown as a function of the lattice constant a. After [ShockleyI939].
At e.g. a2, both a donor-like and an acceptor-like surface states are present.
Maue-Shockley states – no modification of the potential
Tamm-Goodwin states – due to modification of the potential
In general – more complicated than simple models
Surfaces and Interfaces 5
Surface states in real systems are complicated.
In particular, one has to allow for:
• So-called surface reconstruction (change of symmetry)
• Changes in the surface potential to preserve electrical neutrality
• Possibilities for surface states to serve as donors and acceptors
Surfaces and Interfaces 6
Band bending and Fermi level pinning
What happens to the surface states if the material is doped?
Usually both donor-like and acceptor-like surface states will appear, and that leads to important complications.
Let us consider an example of a n-doped semiconductor.
Then the donor electrons in the conduction band will reduce their energy by occupying the acceptor-like surface states.
In this way a negative surface charge will be generated, counterbalanced by a positive charge from ionized donors in the depletion layer near the surface.
Surfaces and Interfaces 7
Before equilibration
After equilibration: the surface gets charged, an upward band bending results, the Fermi level gets pinned keeping neutrality
Illustration:
Zdep
Depleted layer
Surfaces and Interfaces 8
How to find the thickness of the depleted layer?
If the donors are fully ionized then the charge density is .
Then, the Poisson equation gives the z-dependence of the potential:
Then
The total surface density, , is still small compared to the integrated density of surface states, so the chemical potential is almost independent of the doping concentration.
Surfaces and Interfaces 9
In a p-type material the bands bend downwards creating a well for electrons rather than a barrier.
Surfaces and Interfaces 10
Semiconductor-metal interfaces
Schottky barriers Ohmic contacts
Surfaces and Interfaces 11
Interfaces are like surfaces; it is semi-extended functions that have to match at the interface.
Most interesting are the situations where the states are located in the conduction band of one component, but in the gap of other one.
Most important example – the states in the gap of a semiconductor, but in a conduction band of a metal.
The extended wave functions in a metal induce evanescent waves in a semiconductor – the so-called induced gap states (IGS).
These states are similar to the decaying wave function in vacuum.
Surfaces and Interfaces 12
Band alignment and Schottky barrier
Typical energy band alignment between a metal (left) and a semiconductor (right) before charge transfer across the interface is allowed.
Electron affinity
New feature - induced gap interface states (IGS) due to matching of the wave functions. Interface states can be both donor-like and acceptor-like
Work function
Surfaces and Interfaces 13
Before charge transfer After charge transfer from donors
After charge transfer from metal
Since depletion layer is very thin, the step is drawn as sharp
Schottky barrier
Surfaces and Interfaces 14
Positions of the Fermi levels of a metal and a n-doped semiconductor in equilibrium as obtained within the Schottky model.
Interface states are ignored
Schottky model Schottky barrier
Surfaces and Interfaces 15
Schottky diode
Current-voltage curve
(semiconductor is grounded)
Band diagram at positive (a) and negative (b) voltage (semiconductor is grounded)
Surfaces and Interfaces 16
Variety of Applications. The Schottky diode is used in a wide variety of applications. It can naturally be used as a general-purpose rectifier. However, in terms of RF applications, it is particularly useful because of its high switching speed and high-frequency capability. Schottky diodes are similarly very good as RF detectors as their low capacitance and forward-voltage drop enable them to detect signals which an ordinary PN junction would not see. It has already been mentioned that the Schottky diode has a high-current density and low forward-voltage drop. As a result, Schottky diodes are widely used in power supplies. By using these diodes, less power is wasted, making the supply more efficient. The Schottky diode is used in logic circuits as well as a fundamental building block in a number of other devices
Surfaces and Interfaces 17
Ohmic contacts
Without Schottky barrier
Ohmic contacts can take place when conduction band of both sides overlap
With narrow Schottky barrier (heavily doped)
InAs - metal
Surfaces and Interfaces 18
Conventional semiconductor interface: p-n junction
Surfaces and Interfaces 19
Semiconductor heterointerfaces
n p
Before charge transfer
Equilibration of bulk chemical potentials
IGS
Alignment of surface chemical potentials
IGS
“Quantum charge” is neglected
Surfaces and Interfaces 20
Types of alignment in heterostructures
Type I, center
Type II, staggered
Type II, misaligned
Surfaces and Interfaces 21
There are many theoretical models for the interface band alignment. However, the agreement between theory and experiments is often hampered by surface defects and imperfections, interface strains, etc. Still, the state-of-art technology can provide close-to-perfect interfaces, which can be considered by modern analytical and numerical models.
Surfaces and Interfaces 22
Field effect transistors and quantum wells
Si-MOSFET GaAs-HEMT
Other devices
Surfaces and Interfaces 23
Si-MOSFET
p-doped Si
Ohmic contacts
Oxide, SiO2
Metallic gate
Band alignment along the dashed line at Vg= 0
Surfaces and Interfaces 24
Vg = 0
Vg > 0
Inversion (acc. of electr.) Vg < 0
Accumulation of holes
Ambipolar device
Building blocks for nanodevices 25
Wave functions and eigenenergies: Simple model
Triangular potential approximation
Schrödinger equation
Splitting of variables
Dimensionless variable
Localization length
Airy function
Building blocks for nanodevices 26
Energy quantization is given by the roots
Each level generates a sub-band in the energy spectrum
Fermi level
2DEG
Quasi 2DEG
Building blocks for nanodevices 27
Transverse wave functions in a triangle well
Normalized electron densities
Surfaces and Interfaces 28
and Size quantization – discrete modes!
Quantized levels of transverse motion
Electron density profile
Quasi-two-dimensional electron gas
However, oxide is amorphous and the interface scattering is noticeable
Ions and electrons are separated and Coulomb scattering is relatively weak
Surfaces and Interfaces 29
Usage of Si-MOSFETs for digital electronics according to CMOS-technology, as well as most important circuits for realizing logical operations are briefly discussed in the Sec. 3.4.1.1 of the textbook.
Surfaces and Interfaces 30
GaAs-HEMT Typical choice – interface Al0.3Ga0.7As - GaAs,
Type I alignment, conduction band of Al0.3Ga0.7As is 300 meV higher than that one of GaAs. The top of the Al0.3Ga0.7As valence band is 160 meV below that of GaAs.
In contrast to Si, GaAs remains undoped, and the electrons are provided by the doping layer (Si) inside the Al0.3Ga0.7As. This is called the modulation doping.
Building blocks for nanodevices 31
2DEG
Doping layer
Why δ-doping is advantageous?
Scattering potential
Matrix element
Backscattering is exponentially suppressed
large mobility
Surfaces and Interfaces 32
Surfaces and Interfaces 33
Advantages of GaAs-based systems:
• Crystalline structure, low interface scattering;
• Doped layer is rather remote from the two-dimensional electron gas;
Very high mobility: the present record is 1440 m2/Vs, that corresponds to the mean free path of 120 μm.
• Possibility to engineer band offsets by varying content of Al. In this way one can make quantum wells.
Surfaces and Interfaces 34
Evolution of electron mobility over time, after modulation doping was introduced After L. Pfeiffer et al., 1989.
Quantum confined vs. bulk carriers
Surfaces and Interfaces 35
Significance of various scattering mechanisms in Ga[Al]As HEMT Dots – experimental results for the structure with
Building blocks for nanodevices 36
The band gap engineer’s map
It is shown which compounds can tolerate
Many technological problems: lattice matching, interface states, possibilities for modulation doping, etc. doping of a heterostructure implemented in such way that the resulting free electrons are spatially separated from the positive donor ions; as a result scattering of moving electrons on the dopant atoms is avoided; aslo, due to the separation, electrons remain free and mobile even at the very low temperatures
Surfaces and Interfaces 37
Other types of layered devices
Quantum wells
Surfaces and Interfaces 38
Organic FET
pentacene
polythiophene
“Plastic” transistors • Less expensive
• Mechanically soft
At present time such systems are just in the beginning of the way
Surfaces and Interfaces 39
Summary
• FETs and quantum well, and other layered devices are widely used. They are also promising for future.
• Interfaces strongly influence the band structure, in particular, dispersion laws, effective masses, etc. Many issues are already understood, but many things have to be done.
• Organic transistors are in the beginning of their way.