Sustainability Assessment of Technologies (SAT)

&

Waste Management Projects

Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed Memon

Programme Officer, IETC

Penang Eco Town Workshop

7 December 2011

Structure of Presentation

• About SAT Methodology

• Key Characteristics of SAT methodology

• Use of SAT

• Key elements

• Methodology / Decision making process of SAT

Why integrate ‘Sustainable Development’ in Technology

Assessment?

• Technology plays an important role in Development

• The dominant system of decision making in technology

selection, focuses on economic considerations and tends to

disassociate social and environmental factors

• A fragmented approach in making technology choices has

implications on efficiency and sustainability of technology

• Integration of Economic, Social and Environmental

considerations ensures Resource (Economic and

Environmental) Efficiency and Social Acceptability

Sustainable Assessment of Technology (SAT)

• SAT Methodology …

… Integrates Environmental, Social and Economic

Considerations

… Focuses on environment and development together and puts

them at the centre of the economic and political decision

making process

... Can be adapted to country specific parameters and

constraints

SAT – Some Key Characteristics

• It Undergoes progressive assessment (Tiered) procedure

(screening, scoping and detail assessment) thereby

optimizing information requirements.

• It operates on strategic as well as operational level

• It is a quantitative procedure allowing objective

assessment, sensitivity analyses and incorporation of

scenarios

• It incorporates Continuous improvement through Plan-Do-

Check-Act (PDCA) cycle

• It is not an automated process thereby making country

specific adaptation possible

Use of SAT

• Policy and Government Level

For Strategic Planning and Policy making

• Financing Institution Level For Assessing projects for funding

• Operational Level For assessment of alternative technologies

• Community and Cluster Level For assessment and comparison of collective

alternative technologies

• Community / Enterprise Level For comparing technology options

Application of SAT

The application areas include:

• Environment and health related programs

• Provision of basic infrastructure such as roads, power,

water etc.

• Bio-diversity management

• End-of pipe water and waste management

technologies

• Water and waste recycling programs

• Process technology modernization at shop floors and

at industrial clusters

SAT Methodology

Screening

Public

Information /

Consultation

Define targets

Issues to be addressed

/

Problems to be solved

Strategic Level Assessment

Preferred Technology Options

Operational Level Assessment Detailed

engineering design

& costing

Monitoring /

Performance

Evaluation

Scoping

Detailed

Assessment

Cu

sto

miz

ed

Cri

teri

a a

nd

Ind

ica

tors

co

ns

ide

rin

g

en

vir

on

me

nta

l, s

oc

ial a

nd

ec

on

om

ic c

on

sid

era

tio

ns

Implementation

Situational Analysis

Anticipating Future

Scenarios

SAT Methodology – Situation Analysis

Situation Analysis and Defining Targets

The Situation Analysis includes:

• Baseline data collection

• Stakeholder consultation

• Mapping and analyses

These two Steps help to identify issues,

assess their significance and leads to setting

of targets that should be addressed by

proper technology intervention.

Situational

Analysis

Define targets

SAT Methodology

Strategic level assessment

This is done by planners, decision–makers, elected

representatives through participatory sessions

The outcomes are important as it

• Helps to develop customized criteria and indicators for

operational level from generic level.

• Facilitates short-listing and identification of suitable

options

• Provides leads to future scenario building (e.g.

population growth, tighten legal requirement) there by

putting more light on technology choice.

Strategic Level Assessment

SAT Methodology

Operational level assessment

Engineers and technical staff assess the available

technology options

In community or enterprise level, operational level

assessment can be the first step.

The level of expert opinion and technical information

is very important.

Operational Level

Assessment

Tools for SAT

Strategic Level

Assessment

Operational Level

Assessment

Stakeholder Consultation

Expert Opinion

Information

SAT Methodology – Operation Level

Screening

Scoping

Detailed

Assessment

Customized Criteria and Indicators

considering environmental,

social and economic

considerations

Three-Tier

Assessment

SAT Methodology – Operation Level

In this Step:

• The short listed systems from Operational level

Assessment, undergoes objective YES/NO type

answers

• Options which do not qualify one or all conditions,

are directly eliminated.

E.g.: Compliance to legal requirements or Use of non-

hazardous substances

Screening

Screening at Operational Level Example: Waste Treatment Technology

Criteria Mass burn

Modular incineration

Fluidized bed incineration

RDF Sanitary land filling combined with aerobic composting

Sanitary land filling combined with bio-methanation

Manual land filling combined with vermicomposting

Compliance with local env. Laws

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Compliance with national env. laws

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Compliance with MEA’s

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Safe to Use Yes No* Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Provides savings on resources

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

* There has been widespread concerns over the consistency and adequacy of air pollution controls.

SAT Methodology – Operation Level

• It is a Comprehensive and Qualitative type

(High/Medium/Low) assessment

• Various technology options are assessed against generic or

customized criteria and indicators with use of computational

methods such as:

– The weighted sum technique

– Sensitivity analysis

– Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM): By ‘Expert

choice’, a software using Analytical Hierarchy

Process (AHP) to carry out MCDM

Scoping

Sccoping at Operational Level Example: Waste Treatment Technology

Criteria Weight (Wt.)

Mass burn Fluidized bed incineration

RDF Sanitary land filling combined with aerobic composting

Sanitary land filling combined with bio-methanation

Manual land filling combined with vermicomposting

Score Wt.*score

Score Wt.*score

Score

Wt.*score

Score Wt.*score

Score Wt.*score

Score Wt.*score

Suitability of waste characteristics to technology application

10

Past experience (under similar condition)

10

Land requirements 10

Overall pollutant removal efficiency

10

Acceptability (to the public)

10

Income generation potential

7

TOTAL (Weight * Assign score)

Scoping at Operational Level Example: Waste Treatment Technology

Rank Number

Score Technology system

1 Sanitary land filling with bio-methanation

2 Manual land filling with vermicomposting

3 Sanitary land filling with aerobic (windrow) composting

4 Fluidized bed incineration

5 RDF

6 Mass burn

The first three ranks of technology systems are short listed for Detailed Assessment

SAT Methodology – Operation Level

• The options with best overall ratings from Scoping are

selected for Technical and Economic feasibility Assessment

• The Assessment level is situation specific and requires

detailed and quantitative information.

• The outcome is a list of technology options ranked as per

their scores

Detailed Assessment

133, 126, 149

Secondary contaminant

generation

Noise levels Odour levels

25

50

75

100

Sanitary landfilling with aerobic composting

Sanitary landfilling with biomethanation

Manual landfilling with vermicomposting

Star Diagram for Detailed Assessment of criteria pertaining to Environmental Aspects only

249, 353, 316

Savings in energy

Capital investment

O & M costs

Financial incentives

Payback period

NPV / IRR

25

50

75

100

Sanitary landfilling with aerobic composting

Sanitary landfilling with biomethanation

Manual landfilling with vermicomposting

Star Diagram for Detailed Assessment of criteria pertaining to Economic Aspects only)

Process stability

367.5, 387.5,

459

Level of automation

Estimated useful life Person-power

requirements

Technical

knowledge

requirements

25

50

75

100

Sanitary landfilling with aerobic composting

Sanitary landfilling with biomethanation

Manual landfilling with vermicomposting

Fuel consumption

Electricity consumption

Star Diagram for Detailed Assessment of criteria pertaining to Technical Aspects only)

Process stability

805.5, 922.5,

1008

Level of automation

Estimated useful life

Fuel consumption

Electricity consumption

Savings in energy

Capital investment

O & M costs

Financial incentives Payback period NPV / IRR

Secondary contaminant

generation

PPE requirement

for staff

Safety risk for

workers and

communities

Noise levels

Odour levels

Person-power

requirements

Technical

knowledge

requirements

25

50

75

100

Sanitary landfilling with aerobic composting

Sanitary landfilling with biomethanation

Manual landfilling with vermicomposting

Composite Star Diagram for Detailed Assessment

Ranking of Technology Options

At this stage the ranking of technology

system options is as follows:

• Option 1: Manual land filling with

vermicomposting

• Option 2: Sanitary land filling with bio

methanation

• Option 3: Sanitary land filling with aerobic

composting

SAT Methodology – Operation Level Anticipating Future Scenario

In order to check the robustness of selected

technology options, same methodology with

simulated future scenario’s to be applied so at

to confirm that the technology stands the test

of time.

SAT Methodology Preferred Technology Options

Before discarding low scoring options and/or final decision

on selection of technology one must keep in mind

• Highest score technology option for current scenario

needs to be carefully reviewed for different scenarios as

it may not be equally eligible as feasible option in other

scenarios

• On the other hand, the technology options with less

score may qualify for different scenarios with suitable

technology transfer/capacity building efforts.

SAT Methodology – Operation Level Implementation and Monitoring

Once the decision on Suitable Option is made, this

step covers the following:

• Engineering design

• Tendering

• Actual construction and commissioning

Evaluation of technology during operational phase

ensures meeting of desired objective against criteria

considered in SAT process

SAT Methodology Reporting, Monitoring and Feedback

• Reporting the outcome of monitoring and evaluation to

stakeholders, govt. agencies and decision makers acts as

basis for situation analysis for future projects and helps in

making informed decisions

• It helps refine and build the Methodology by -

– Inclusion of additional criteria

– Disqualification of technology in future for similar

situations due to negative experiences.

SAT Application Details Tier 1 screening

4 criteria total

Compliance with local environmental laws or guidelines, compliance with national environmental laws, compliance with MEAs, meeting project objectives

Tier 2

Scoping

5 components, 32 criteria total

Technical suitability: compatibility with local conditions (geographical and climate, including settlement patterns and density), local material usage, availability of expertise, track record on performance, technical knowledge requirements, compatibility with existing situation, adaptability to future situations, process stability, estimated useful life, pollutant removal efficiency

Environment – health & safety risks: risk levels for workers, communities, biodiversity…

Environment – resources and emissions: resource usage, energy consumption, renewable energy, water consumption, resource augmentation capabilities…

Economic/financial aspects: capital investments, O&M costs, benefits

Sociocultural aspects: acceptability, extent of resettlement/rehabilitation, etc.

Tier 3

Detailed assessment

3 components, 18 criteria total

Environment – resources and emissions: land/space requirement, labor requirement, energy consumption,, emissions, etc.

Economic-financial aspects: capital costs, O&M, benefits (nutrients and energy reclaimed, carbon credits, etc.), financial incentives

Economic viability: NPV, payback period…

• Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) projects in Wuxi (China),

Pune (India), Maseru (Lesotho), Matale (Sri Lanka), Novo Hamburgo (Brazil), Bahir Dar (Ethiopia), Pathum Thani (Thailand), Addis Ababa (Ethiopia)

• WEEE / e-waste management project in Phnom Penh (Cambodia)

• Converting waste agricultural biomass into resource in Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines and Sri Lanka

• Converting waste plastics into resource in Philippines and Thailand

• Regional training SAT, ISWM, WEEE / E-waste management, waste agricultural biomass management, and waste plastics management

• Various publications including compendiums of technologies and guideline

• Report on “Waste and Climate Change” –launched in Cancun

• Global Partnership on Waste Management (GPWM)

• Information Platform on Waste Management

IETC Activities on Waste Management

3

1

Integrated Waste Management based on 3R (reduce, reuse and recycle)

Residential

Collection of Waste Segregation of Waste

Recycling waste (organic & inorganic)

Waste Exchange Discarded waste

Treatment Recovery

Final waste

Final disposal

Hazardous Waste for Treatment & Disposal

3R

Services (Healthcare, Laboratory, etc.)

Industrial & Commercial

3R 3R

Energy

Resources

Plastics, wood, steel, paper, glass, and compost/biogas

Sanitary Landfill, Incineration

Methane & heat

3

2

Pilot Projects on ISWM • Wuxi New District, China – 2008

• Pune City, India – 2008

• Maseru City, Lesotho – 2009

• Matale City, Sri Lanka – 2009

• Novo Hamburgo, Brazil – 2009

• Nairobi, Kenya – 2010

• Bahir Dar, Ethiopia – 2010

• Pathum Thani, Thailand – 2011

• Addis Ababa – 2011

Danang, Vietnam

Kampot, Cambodia

3

3

Outcomes of Projects • Local capacity building on:

Baseline studies, assessment of gaps, target setting, stakeholders consultations, development of plans, identification of environmentally sound technologies and implementation & review

• Enabling environment: Policy recommendations (regulatory and financing) based on learning from international experiences

• Tangible outcomes: Resource augmentation and resource efficiency to support economic activities without putting pressure on environmental resources

• Partnerships: Multi-level government, private sector and civil society partnerships

3

4

Normative Work on ISWM • South-South Cooperation on ISWM – 2008

• Training Manuals on ISWM (four volumes)

Waste characterization and quantification

Assessment of current waste management system

Target setting and stakeholders issues of concern

how to develop ISWM Plan?

• Regional Training on ISWM Manuals:

Africa in Mauritius – Mar 09

Asia-Pacific in Osaka – Oct 09

Asia-Pacific in Seoul – July10

• Training on SAT for ISWM – Dec10

3

5

Technologies • Methodology to assess technologies (Sustainability Assessment of

Technologies, SAT) was developed to assist practitioners to provide financial, environmental, social and technical assessment to policy makers for well informed decision-making

• Various compendium of technologies are compiled to provide information on technology routes, technology providers and technology details (wherever available)

• Experts, technology providers, technology users and policy makers workshops on technology to provide opportunity discuss the challenges and possible solutions

• Field visits to provide direct feeling and understanding on how technologies are working in different environments / locations

28/12/2012 Centre 36

E-waste Management

http://www.unep.or.jp/Ietc/Publications/spc/EWasteManual_Vol1.pdf

http://www.unep.or.jp/Ietc/Publications/spc/EWasteManual_Vol2.pdf

Capacity building of local partners

on E-waste Inventory and

Management:

Training and application of

manuals through pilot projects

International Workshops in Osaka

2010 and 2011

http://www.unep.or.jp/IETC/SPC/news-jul11/UNEP_Ewaste_Manual3_TakeBackSystem.pdf

3

7

Global Partnership on Waste Management

The conceptual structure of GPWM is the following:

3

8

Information Platform Structure

Thank You…

Osaka

2-110 Ryokuchi Koen,

Tsurumi-ku,

Osaka 538-0036, Japan

Tel : +81 (0) 6 6915 4581

Fax : +81 (0) 6 6915 0304

E-mail : unep.tie@unep.org

Web: http://www.unep.or.jp

International Environmental

Technology Centre