1
2
SUSTAINABLE BIOBASED
BIODEGRADABLE PLASTICS: An Alternative
to Non-Biodegradable Plastic Products
Dr Sudhakar Muniyasamy
CSIR-Chemical Cluster,
Advanced Polymer and Composite Research Group,
Pretoria 0001
NSTF Seminar: Plastics – substitutes vs recycling
15 November 2019
3
Presentation Outline
• Introduction
• Plastics waste management options
• Sustainable bioplastics from renewable resources
• Market and Economics
• Biodegradation claims/Certification/Logo
• A success of bioplastics in Italy: A case study
• Overview of CSIR R&D bioplastic technology
• Key findings
• Conclusion and Recommendations
4
Potential risk of contamination of recycling systems biodegradable vs non-
biodegradable petroleum based plastics?
Is bioplastics threat to recycling industry?
Is recycling economical viable with taking concerns about the cost of
separation, and about increased contamination, yield loss and impact on
recycled materials quality and processing?
Is biodegradability a solution to plastics end-of-life?
Questions on Bioplastic technology?
5
Still bioplastic degrade as microplastic or 100% biodegradable?
What are bioplastics, biodegradable plastics and compostable
plastics?
How long the biodegradable plastics take to degradation in landfill, home
compost, industrial compost and marine water?
How to identify biodegradable plastic vs compostable plastic vs
conventional plastics?
Questions on Bioplastic technology?
6
50-55%
Non-durable items application
World Plastics Production
Ref : Adapted from Plastic Europe 2018
Growth of world plastics production
7
Plastics Packaging
8
• The world faces a global plastics pollution crisis
• Plastic takes more than 100 years to degrade
• Harmful to many living organisms
• Globally, more than 8 million tonnes per year of single-use plastics are dumped in
landfill site or oceans
Copyright:© Daniel Müller / Greenpeace Image by Daily Maverick
Reference: https://plasticoceans.org/the-facts/; Plastics SA 2016
Plastics Pollution
9
• Plastics are cheap to produce but very
expensive to clean the environment.
• Future generation will suffer from the
pollution caused by plastic.
Plastics Pollution
Source : EPA 2017, WEF 2019
10
Source: Science 2015: Vol. 347, Issue 6223, pp. 768-771
Mismanagement of plastics waste
11
Environmental impact of plastics & waste
management in South Africa
• 90% of the waste generated in SA is still disposed of to landfill (dumpsites) including plastics
• Valuable finite resources (fibre, polymer, metals, etc.) lost (>R17b is being lost to the SA economy)
DST 2014. SA RDI waste road map http://www.wasteroadmap.co.za/
12
Plastics Waste Management Options
Solid Waste Management Hierarchy
Compost biodegradation
• It was found that the land filling of all waste is generally the worst strategy from an
environmental point of view.
• Significant reductions of gaseous emissions can be accomplished through biogasification and
composting of the biodegradable materials.
Source: Waste Management 23 (2003) 403–409; Environmental Protection Agency, http://www.epa.gov; Torfaen County
Borough, Environment & Planning: Composting
14
Source: EPA 2017; European Bioplastics 2017
• There is global drive to reduce the use of single-use plastics
• African countries such as Kenya, Ivory Coast, Tanzania and others
have outlawed the use of petroleum-based single and short-term use
plastic items
Bioplastics for a Circular Economy
15
Environmental effects: No hazards in raw materials sourcing Decreased consumption of non-renewable
resources Reduction in GHG emission during biobased
polymer production Biodegradation and recycling opportunities for
biobased products
Drivers of Bioplastics
Source : http://www.southafrica.info/business/economy/policies/ndp2030.htm#.UE0p-6TrrAA#ixzz261HHvhNQ]
Social effects: Contribution to rural development for biomass
sourcing Increasing sustainability and greening of chemical
industry Improve workforce health and safety Decrease in human toxicity
Economic effects: Utilization of wastes and by-product streams Contribution to rural development Competiveness of raw materials compared to fossil
fuels Creation of jobs and maintaining production in some
cases savings in production costs, investment costs Possible green premium within the value chain from
chemicals to bio-based plastics Market entry in environmentally friendly products New innovations and products with superior
functionality Saving waste charges
16
No production on African continent
BIOPLASTICS MARKET (Global production)
17
BIOPLASTICS MARKET
• World plastics production was approximately 335 million tonnes in 2017 with an
annual growth rate of 3% (Source: Plastics Europe-2018)
• It is predicted that bioplastics will account for 4% of market share in 2019
18
Total:
2.11 million
tonnes in %
BIOPLASTICS MARKET (segment)
Packaging remains the largest
field of application for bioplastics
with almost 60% (1.2 million
tonnes) of the total bioplastics
market in 2018
19
Agricultural Feedstocks for Industrial Uses
Source : European Bioplastics
20
What are bioplastics?
Source : European Bioplastics
The term “biobased" signifies whether
the carbon content in any substance
comes from organic sources, such as
plants and agricultural sources, rather
than fossil sources such as oil and coal.
The value proposition with products
made from plant biomass that does not
exist with products made from oil or coal
PBAT – PVOH –
PCL – PBS
PLA – PHB – PHBV –
CELLOPHANE –
THERMOPLASTIC
STARCH
PE – PP – PVC –
PET – PA – PBT –
PA – PUR – ABS -
NYLON
GREEN PE –
GREEN PP –
GREEN NYLON
PETRO
BASED BIO
BASED
BIODEGRADABLE
RECALCITRANT
Biodegradable vs Biobased Plastics
Question : Is biodegradability a solution to plastics
end-of-life?
Ans : Yes with certified, verifiable
biodegradable/compostable plastics offers responsible
end-of-life options for plastics waste in harmony with
the circular economy model
Question : Is bioplastic a solution to plastic pollution?
Ans : No
23
Misleading biodegradation claims/
labelling
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/apr/29/biodegradable-plastic-bags-survive-three-
years-in-soil-and-sea
A plastic bag labelled
biodegradable after three
years in the marine
environment
24
Misleading biodegradation claims/
labelling
25
Composting plant in the USA,
contaminated with oxo-degradable
PE bags
Ref: Source from Prof C.Bonten, IKT, Germany
“Oxo-degradable” additives
Consist of transition elements (cobalt,
manganese, iron, zinc) that promote
oxidation and chain cleavage of conventional
plastics when these are exposed to heat, air
and UV light.
This chain degradation results in very small,
hardly visible polymer particles (microplastic)
which will not biodegrade and will move
through the food chain.
Scientific evidences on biodegradation
claims is lacking
What is Oxo-additives technology
and Microplastic?
26
Correct labelling/
Verified
Certification bodies, Standard and Logos
for Biodegradable Polymer Products
27
Challenges in the Biobased/Biodegradable
Polymers
» Low mechanical and thermal properties
» Not suitable for conventional processing
» Low scale up production
» 3 to 5 times expensive than conventional plastics
» Contamination in plastics recycling when biopolymer mixed with non-
biodegradable plastics
Ref: European Polymer Journal 2013, 49(10):2839-2858
28
The success of bioplastics: a case
study in Italy
• Identified plastic carrier bags most common plastic waste items in marine
environment approx. 41% of the total
• One of the solution represented by Biodegradable and compositable carrier bags
certified by accredited certification bodies
• Characteristic carrier bags in compliance with European standards EN 13432 :
(i) absence of heavy metals; (ii) Biodegradability within six months; absence of
negative impacts on the composting processing;
• Biodegradation occurs in soil and marine environments
Mater-Bi Home
compostable bags - Italy
29
A case study in Italy : Biodegradable and
Compostable bags
• Plastic Ban in 2011 – light weight traditional plastic bags
• Positive effects – increase of reusable bags, use of first biodegradable and
compostable bags and biowaste bags with more environmental awareness
• 94% Italian support
• In Italy almost 40 million people make separate collection of organic waste
• Quality rate organic waste collected – 95.73%, i.e 5mtons, capture rate
90kg/per person/yr
30
• New agro-industrial value chains
• In synergy with agricultural local production
• New opportunities for traditional – plastic transformation industry
• Boost for local growth areas - affected by crisis
• New investments in R&D
• New job opportunities
• Represents a model for new regulations in the environmental field
Bioplastics : A case study in Italy of
Bioeconomy
» AGRO-RESIDUES DERIVED FROM AGRI-INDUSTRIES THAT CONTRIBUTE
SIGNIFICANTLY TO THE SA-GDP AND ARE CURRENTLY UNDER DISTRESS,
SUCH AS:
– Paper & pulp waste streams, Sugarcane, maize, chicory,
pineapple and other high-value agro-crops waste streams.
» LONG TERM IMPACT WILL BE TRANFORMATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN
INDUSTRY TOWARDS BIO-BASED PRODUCTS AS A BASE FOR SOUTH AFRICAN
BIOECONOMY
CSIR R&D Aligned to SA Bio-Economy
Strategy
Crops
Waste Streams Tonnage potential
(metric tons)
Waste residues
from crop
Maize / Corn Cob, stover, stalk,
leaves 10,584,269
Cobs
Stalks
Sugarcane Bagasse 6,302,133 Bagasse
Forestry Saw dust 300 000
Paper & Pulp Sludge 300 000
CSIR led biorefinery technologies in development of new
value chains from lignocellulosic biomass
CSIR Focus
LED BY CSIR
CHEMICAL
CLUSTER
OPERATING
UNIT Sugar Baggase
(waste
streams)
Paper & Pulp
(waste
streams)
Maize Stalk
(waste
streams)
Biofuel Crops
(waste
streams)
SA Agro-Industry
contributing to GDP
Value added R&D for
niche applications 32
33
Cellulose
Starch
Hemicellulose
Lignin
Oil
Biobased Products
THE CONVERSION CHAIN (BIOREFINERY)
Biomass (agro-based, ligno-
cellulosic and organic waste) Bioplastics
Use
Sugarcane
bagasse Maize stalk
Intermediates Additives (Modifier)
adhesives, coating, microfibrillated
cellulose nanofibres
Manufacture
Recycle Biodegrade
Reuse
Disposal
CSIR R&D Overview: Agricultural biomass
for bioplastics and biobased products
34
Biodegradable plastic
bag production
CSIR R&D
BIOPLASTIC FRUIT CRATE水果箱
Extracted from
biomass
Processing
• Extrusion
• Blown film
moulding
• Injection
moulding
Bioplastic
formulation
Retailer
systems Consumers
Bioplastic Fruit Crate
CSIR Bioplastics for Packaging
35
Advantages of CSIR bioplastic technology
Good mechanical properties that is
similar to conventional plastics
Processing by conventional
techniques (melt extrusion, blown
film extrusion & injection moulding)
100% biodegradable in soil,
compost and water
100% recyclable (mechanical)
Renewable resource based and
non-toxic
Suitable for packaging applications
(films/bags/crates), agricultural
applications (mulch films/nursery
pots)
Bioplastic fruit crate
Agricultural Mulch films
POTENTIAL PRODUCTS
Biodegradable
plastic bag
Nursery pots
Biodegradable cutleries Biodegradable
Sanitary Pads
CSIR Bioplastics for Packaging
36
Biodegradation Testing Facility for Bio-Products:
Environmental Claims & Certifications
Completion of carbon cycle in short span
CSIR Biodegradation testing Facility
0 day 17 days 30 days
After biodegradation in water medium
After biodegradation testing in microscopy
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Bio
de
gra
da
tion
(%
)
180160140120100806040200
Incubation Time (Days)
Neat PLA
Cellulose (reference)
CSIR bioplastic R&D
37
After 60 days After 30 days After 140 days
Biodegradation testing of CSIR R&D
bioplastic bag : sea water conditions
100% biodegradable in Sea water
38
After 60 days 0 day After 90 days
100% Biodegradable in Soil
Biodegradation testing of CSIR R&D
bioplastic bag : soil conditions
39
Aggressiveness of Biodegradation and its
Mechanisms
Biodegradation mechanisms of
carbon backbone & hetero chain
polymer
The trend of plastic production & consumption and mounting of environmental concern caused by plastic waste, are in favour of an increasing acceptance and diffusion of biodegradable plastics(BDPs).
The improved utilization of agricultural undervalued by-products in biomaterial formulations by green technology research (renewable, recyclable and reusable) has opportunities to create new biomaterials for uses in packaging and other sectors.
Renewable resources can be used as cost-effective feedstocks for production of BDPS.
BDPs will replace conventional commodity plastics in those segments where recycling or feedstock recovery is difficult and heavily penalized from an economical standpoint.
Biobased polymers from non-food agricultural ligno-cellulosic biomass have a potential role to play in the development of the bioeconomy due to their potential to address environmental concerns regarding plastic waste and economy challenges.
Conclusions and Recommendations
40
Acknowledgements
FUNDING • NRF • Department of Environmental Affairs • Department of Science & Innovation –RDI waste road map • Department of Science & Innovation - BioEconomy • CSIR
INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION
University of Pisa – Italy
Tiajin University – China
IITmadras- India
Alagappa University – India
University of Guelph-Canada
42
19 September 2018
Thank you