+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal...

Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal...

Date post: 13-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
14
Laser induced graphene for biosensors Zhengfen Wan a,b , Nam-Trung Nguyen a , Yongsheng Gao b,c , Qin Li a,b, a Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Grifth University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia b School of Engineering and Built Environment, Grifth University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia c Institute for Integrated and Intelligent Systems, Grifth University, QLD 4111, Australia abstract article info Article history: Received 28 May 2020 Received in revised form 20 July 2020 Accepted 22 July 2020 Available online xxxx Biosensors can sensitively and selectively detect a wide range of compounds and macromolecules strongly rele- vant to human health diagnosis and environment monitoring. Laser induced graphene (LIG) fabricated from pol- yimide has recently received intense interest for biosensor application due to its unique properties, such as three- dimensional macroporous structure, good conductivity and superior facile laser fabrication process. This laser di- rect writing technology demonstrates a great potential for developing graphene-based electronics for its chemical-free and direct patterning of graphene, as well as suitability for roll-to-roll production. In this review, we summarize the recent development of the fabrication of LIG and its modication for meeting the needs of bio- sensor development. The LIG has been directly employed as electrode, modied with enzyme, aptamer or other catalyst for biosensing. The review also highlights integrated LIG biosensors that can simultaneously measure multiple objectives. © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. Keywords: Laser induced graphene Graphene Biosensor Laser reduction Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Laser induced graphene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.1. Fabrication of laser induced graphene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.2. Modication of laser induced graphene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. Laser induced graphene for biosensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1. LIG-based sensors for ionic species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2. LIG-based sensors for small molecules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2.1. Ascorbic acid (AA), dopamine (DA) and uric acid (UA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2.2. Hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2.3. Urea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2.4. Thrombin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2.5. Bisphenol A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2.6. Glucose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2.7. Biogenic amines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.3. LIG-based sensors for nucleic acids. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.4. LIG-based sensors for immunology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.4.1. Chloramphenicol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.4.2. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4. Laser induced graphene for multimodal sensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5. Conclusions and outlook. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205 Corresponding author at: Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Grifth University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia. E-mail address: qin.li@grifth.edu.au (Q. Li). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00205 2214-9937/© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Sustainable Materials and Technologies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/susmat
Transcript
Page 1: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Sustainable Materials and Technologies

j ourna l homepage: www.e lsev ie r .com/ locate /susmat

Laser induced graphene for biosensors

Zhengfen Wan a,b, Nam-Trung Nguyen a, Yongsheng Gao b,c, Qin Li a,b,⁎a Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australiab School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australiac Institute for Integrated and Intelligent Systems, Griffith University, QLD 4111, Australia

⁎ Corresponding author at: Queensland Micro- and NanE-mail address: [email protected] (Q. Li).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e002052214-9937/© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

a b s t r a c t

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 28 May 2020Received in revised form 20 July 2020Accepted 22 July 2020Available online xxxx

Biosensors can sensitively and selectively detect a wide range of compounds and macromolecules strongly rele-vant to human health diagnosis and environmentmonitoring. Laser induced graphene (LIG) fabricated from pol-yimide has recently received intense interest for biosensor application due to its unique properties, such as three-dimensional macroporous structure, good conductivity and superior facile laser fabrication process. This laser di-rect writing technology demonstrates a great potential for developing graphene-based electronics for itschemical-free and direct patterning of graphene, as well as suitability for roll-to-roll production. In this review,we summarize the recent development of the fabrication of LIG and itsmodification formeeting the needs of bio-sensor development. The LIG has been directly employed as electrode, modified with enzyme, aptamer or othercatalyst for biosensing. The review also highlights integrated LIG biosensors that can simultaneously measuremultiple objectives.

© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Keywords:Laser induced grapheneGrapheneBiosensorLaser reduction

Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22. Laser induced graphene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2.1. Fabrication of laser induced graphene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.2. Modification of laser induced graphene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

3. Laser induced graphene for biosensor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.1. LIG-based sensors for ionic species. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.2. LIG-based sensors for small molecules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

3.2.1. Ascorbic acid (AA), dopamine (DA) and uric acid (UA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.2.2. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.2.3. Urea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.2.4. Thrombin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.2.5. Bisphenol A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.2.6. Glucose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63.2.7. Biogenic amines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

3.3. LIG-based sensors for nucleic acids. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63.4. LIG-based sensors for immunology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

3.4.1. Chloramphenicol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93.4.2. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

4. Laser induced graphene for multimodal sensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95. Conclusions and outlook. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

otechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.

Page 2: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

2 Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

1. Introduction

Biosensors are analytical devices that convert a biochemical/biolog-ical reaction into ameasurable physico-chemical signal, which providesa quantitative assessment of the analyte concentration [1]. Biosensorscan detect a wide range of chemicals with applications in food security,diseases analyses, and environmental safety [2]. Recently, graphene hasattracted significant interests for biosensor applications such as glucosemonitoring [3,4], DNA sensing [5,6], and folic acid detecting [7,8], owingto the extraordinary electrical and optical properties of the graphene.Reliable, scalable fabrication and modification methods for developingbiosensors are highly on demand to bridge the existing gap betweenlab research and commercialisation [9].

Many approaches have been developed to produce graphene such asmechanical exfoliation [10], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [11] andthe reduction of graphene oxide [12–14]. In 2014, Tour et al. fabricatedmacroporous laser induced graphene (LIG) from commercial polyimide(PI) films with a CO2 laser, exhibiting high electrical conductivity andlarge specific surface area. This laser based reduction method forgraphene shows unique advantages of selective and localized reduction,flexibility in patterning and no requirement for chemicals [15]. Moreimportantly, the precursor of PI and the effective laser treatment dem-onstrate great potential for roll-to-rollmanufacturing [16],which is crit-ical for future commercial applications of LIG-based devices. Followingworks have demonstrated the potential PI-derived LIG in various appli-cations, including nitrogen sensor [17], strain sensor [18,19], gas sensor[20,21], and acoustic sensor [22], antibacterial application [23,24], en-ergy storage [25,26], and antennas [27] etc. Compared to graphene fab-ricated with other method, LIG generates a number of defects, which isnot always a disadvantage. Li et al. and Banerjee et al. demonstrated thatelectron transfer kinetics are tremendously enhanced at graphene edgesites due to its abundance in corrugations and defect densities [28,29].The remaining oxygen components of LIG though decrease its conduc-tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor,they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites for functionali-zation, which are critical for biosensors. Moreover, the porous 3D net-work structure of LIG can improve the efficiency in charge transferandmass transport due to its large specific surface area and highly con-ductive pathways [30–32]. Hence, LIG with its 3D architecture enrichedwith edge planes without complex processing and additive approach isa highly promising material for biosensor [33,34].

In this review,we summarize the recent developments of biosensorsbased on LIG.We pay particular attention to themodification of LIG andthe diverse biosensing applications of this technology. Current chal-lenges and future advancement, such as the integrated flexible devicesare discussed. In these studies, various precursors, mainly commercialpolyimides, were employed for laser reduction. After laser irradiation,the resulting graphene materials are referred differently in papers aslaser-induced graphene [35], laser-scribed graphene [36], or laser car-bonized nanomaterials [16]. The term ‘laser induced graphene (LIG)’ isadopted consistently throughout this paper.

2. Laser induced graphene

2.1. Fabrication of laser induced graphene

In 2014, Tour's group reported porous graphene films fabricationfrom commercial polymer films using a CO2 laser [37]. The LIG exhibitshigh surface area (≈340m2 g−1), high thermal stability (>900 °C), andexcellent conductivity (5–25 S cm−1) [38]. Fig. 1(a-c) shows the laserpatterning process on PI, SEM images and Raman spectrum. The 3D po-rous structure, which renders enhanced-accessible surface areas and fa-cilitates electrolyte penetration into the active materials, can be formedby the release of gas produced during laser treatment. The LIG demon-strates a 2D Raman band (centered at 2700 cm−1), which is typicallyfound in 2D graphite consisting of randomly stacked graphene layers

along the c axis [39]. Considering the long wavelength (10.6 μm) oflaser, the LIG formation is more likely to be caused by photothermal ef-fects. The extremely high localized temperatures (>2500 °C) induced bylaser irradiation could easily break the bonds including C−O, C_O andC − N bonds. Simultaneously, the aromatic compounds are thenrearranged to form graphitic structures.

Diverse laser with varied wavelength, such as CO2 laser (10.6 μm)[16], semiconductor laser (405 nm) [40], and near-infrared (NIR) laser(1064 nm) [41] were reported to fabricate LIG. The mechanism oflaser reduction largely depends on the wavelength of lasers, which de-termines the photochemical effect and photothermal effect involvedin the reduction process induced by laser [42]. Two sub-processes,namely the direct conversion from sp3 to sp2 carbon and removal of ox-ygen functional groups coexist during the laser reduction process [15].Diverse substrates such as cloth, paper, potato skins, coconut shells,cork [43], wood [44], lignin [45], and phenolic resin [46] can be trans-formed into graphene directly by laser irradiation, Fig. 1(d-g). Fig. 1(h) illustrates the scheme for industrial production of LIG film and itsmodification based on the precursor of commercial polymer and the ef-fective laser reduction process. Compared with other graphene sensor,this LIG sensor shows the great advantage of facile fabrication and thehuge potential for commercialization. The LIG sensor can be patternedby direct laser writingwithout additional chemical or high temperaturetreatment. The PI precursor is ready for roll-to-roll production and laserprocess is effective and applicable for large-scale production. The laserdirect writingmethod is also considered to be an effective for graphenefabrication. Kaner et al. reported that more than 100 graphene devicescan be produced over large areas in 30 min or less by direct laser writ-ing, demonstrating scalable fabrication of graphene [47]. The combina-tion of commercial precursor such as polyimide, an effective laserdirect writing system, and an automated roll-to-roll fabrication processholds the key tomaking LIG an industrialized production for biosensors.

2.2. Modification of laser induced graphene

Themodification of LIG with heteroatom doping or the formation ofa composite has been employed as an effective approach for the engi-neering of properties and performance [38]. Three strategies havebeen reported as follow.

1) Laser parameters adjustment, atmosphere and process.

Variousmethods have been developed to tune or improve the phys-ical and chemical properties of LIG by varying the laser parameters orcontrolling the reduction atmosphere, Fig. 2(a-c). Yang et al. demon-strated the surface modification of LIG, including surface morphologies,carbonization and wettability by adjusting laser powers, scanningspeeds and pulse repetition frequencies [16,49]. Controlling the laser re-duction atmosphere (O2, air, Ar, H2, and SF6) can modulate the watercontact angle of LIG from 0° (O2 or air) to >150° (Ar or H2) or > 160°(SF6) [50]. The structure of PI-derived LIG can bemodified from its orig-inal macroporous foam to an intermediate concave corrugated tilestructure and to a final carbon nanotube structure by repeated laser ir-radiations [51]. The abundant hydrophilic surface of LIG facilitates largeamounts of defects and accessible oxygen containing functional groups,which can provide numerous active sites and accelerate electron trans-fer between the electrode and species in solution [52]. By modified theproperties of LIG, the combined effects of the specific surface area, hy-drophilic surface, electronic conductivity and available edge planesites can adjusted be to enhance the electron transfer rate and analyticalperformance in LIG biosensors [53,54].

2) Doping of LIG.

Tour's group fabricated boron-doped LIG from H3BO3 mixed poly(amic acid) (PAA)with a CO2 laser (Fig. 2(d)), and themicrosupercapa-citors based on the boron doped LIG exhibit a high areal capacitance

Page 3: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic illustrate of laser patterning on PI. (b) SEM image of LIG on the PI substrate, scale bar 10 μm. Inset is the corresponding SEM imagewith highermagnification, scale bar1 μm. (c) Raman spectrum of a LIG film and the starting PI film. Reproduced with permission [37]. Copyright 2014, Nature Publishing Group. (d) The letter “R” in LIG induced from bread.(e) Potato scribed with the laser to form LIG in the “R” pattern (2 cm tall). (f) LIG on gray muslin cloth in the shape of an owl. (g) LIG on muslin cloth wrapped around a marker. All owlsdepicted are 60mm in height. Reproducedwith permission [43]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (h) Scheme for roll-to-roll production of LIG film. LIG isfirst formed on the PIsheet, and then developed in a catalyst bath to form hybrid material. Reproduced with permission [48]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.

3Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

of 16.5 mF/cm2 (3 times higher than nondoped devices) and an 5–10times increased energy density [55]. In a similar process, Co3O4, MoO2,or Fe3O4 were individually mixed into PAA solution for laser treatment,contributing to the metal nanocrystals embedded LIG, which exhibit

excellent oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalytic activity [56]. Het-eroatom doping in carbon material demonstrate great potential toimprove the electrocatalytic activity in biosensor [57,58]. Comparedto ordinary graphene materials, the N-doped graphene provides

Page 4: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

Fig. 2. (a) Schemes for the fabrication of LIG inside a controlled atmosphere chamber. (b) The relationship between contact angle (bars), D/G ratio (black dots), and 2D/G ratio (whitecircles) for LIG samples made under different gas atmospheres. Reproduced with permission [50]. Copyright 2017, John Wiley and Sons. (c) Sheet conductivity of LIG trace onpolyimide as a function of laser fabrication parameters (power and speed). Reproduced with permission [16]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society. (d) Synthetic scheme for thepreparation of boron doped LIG and fabrication of the boron doped LIGmicrosupercapacitor. Reproduced with permission [55]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society. (e) The TEMimages of LIG embedded with MoO2. The inset shows the high-resolution TEM images showing crystalline MoO2 in LIG. Reproduced with permission [56]. Copyright 2015, AmericanChemical Society. (f) SEM images of the LIG structures with electroless plated Ni. Reproduced with permission [40]. Copyright 2011, Elsevier. (g) Cross-sectional SEM images of LIGwith electrodeposited MnO2. Scale bar is 100 μm. Reproduced with permission [61]. Copyright 2015, JohnWiley and Sons.

4 Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

significantly enhanced oxidation currents for the enzymatic detection ofglucose [59]. Metal nanoparticles (Au, Pt, etc.) doped graphene also ex-hibited excellent electrocatalytical activity for biosensing, resultingfrom the large surface area and good electrical conductivity of graphene,and the synergistic effect of graphene and metal nanoparticles [60].Therefore, in-situ doping and metal nanoparticle doping of LIG can beeffective strategies to enhance the performance of LIG biosensor.

3) Post-surface modification (Fig. 2(e-g)).

Pseudocapacitive materials such asmanganese dioxide (MnO2), fer-ric oxyhydroxide (FeOOH) or polyaniline (PANI)were simply electrode-posited on the surface of LIG for all-solid-state flexible supercapacitorswith improved performance [61]. By using a laser direct writing tech-nique and an electroless Ni plating, the LIG/Ni composite structureswere prepared with a low resistance of less than 0.1 Ohm/sq., demon-strating an integrated wireless charging and storage device and anear-field communication (NFC) tag applications [40]. With post-

surface processing, such as, deposition, dispersing, polymerization, orbinding, single strand DNA (ssDNA), RNA, antibodies, enzyme mole-cules, and aptamers can be immobilized onto LIG surface for direct tar-get probing [62,63].

The LIG demonstrates a great potential for developing environmen-tally friendly electronic devices. In terms of the rawmaterial, besides thecommercial PI that shows stable thermal, chemical and mechanicalproperties. Various natural precursors such as wood, cotton, paper andlignin (an abundant natural polymer in plants) were extended for thefabrication of LIG [43,44,64]. In terms of the laser irradiation process,the fabrication of LIG and device patterning can be simultaneously com-pleted without traditional etching, lithography and deposition process.There is no involvement of strong acid and oxidants, which can causepollution or high temperature furnaces that requires enormous con-sumption of energy [15]. The thickness of LIG can be modulated from20 μm to 38 μm on the 125 μm PI by different laser parameters [65].The repeated laser irradiations on PI-derived LIG can modify the mor-phology and structure of LIG [51], indicating the possible recycle of

Page 5: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

5Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

the LIG products. In terms of device performance, LIG applications re-flect distinguished electrical and mechanical properties and demon-strate excellent stability and cyclability [21,61], which illustratepossible future application in wearable and flexible electronics. There-fore, it is very promising that the further development of natural precur-sors, the simple and repeatable laser process and the high performanceof LIG devices contribute to environmentally friendly andbiocompatibleelectronic applications.

3. Laser induced graphene for biosensor

3.1. LIG-based sensors for ionic species

Li et al. reported a simple one-step and scalable direct-laser-writingmethod for the LIG in situ decorated with metal sulfide (MS) nanocom-posite (CdS and PbS) as an efficient transducer for photoelectrochemicaldetection of Cu2+ with low detection limit of 2.0 nM and good selectiv-ity shown, Fig. 3(a-c) [66]. The LIG decoratedwithmetal nanocompositephotoelectrode were synthesized by laser irradiation on the metal-complex containing polyethersulfone on indium tin oxide (ITO) glass,simultaneously producing the LIG and the crystallization of laser-induced metal sulfide [66]. The LIG with CdS interact with Cu2+, gener-ating CuxS (x= 1, 2), which serves as exciton trapping sites on the sur-face, decreasing the efficiency of charge separation and contributing to aprominent decline of photocurrent output in LIG with CdS photoanode[67].

Glaussen et al. demonstrated the LIG functionalized with a poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC)-based ion-selective membrane for electrochem-ical sensing of plant available nitrogen (NH4+ andNO3−) in soil samples(Fig. 3(d-e)) [17]. This LIG solid contact ion-selective electrodes (SC-ISE) SC-ISEs demonstrates near Nernstian sensitivities (51.7 ±7.8mV/dec forNH4+ and− 54.8±2.5mV/dec forNO3−), lowdetectionlimits (28.2 ± 25.0 μM for NH4+ and 20.6 ± 14.8 μM for NO3−), and alinear sensing range of 10−5–10−1 M for both. With a facile low-costfabrication process and no requirement ofmetallic nanoparticle decora-tion, LIG electrochemical sensors are promising for a wide range of in-field or point-of-service applications for soil health management. In asimilar way, Kucherenko et al. reported LIG electrodes functionalizedwith ion-selective membranes for monitoring the concentrations ofNH4+ and K+ in urine samples [68]. This electrochemical LIG sensor ex-hibit a broad sensing range (0.1–150mM for NH4+ and 0.3–150mM forK+) with high stability across a wide pH range (3.5 to 9.0) in aqueoussolutions [68].

3.2. LIG-based sensors for small molecules

3.2.1. Ascorbic acid (AA), dopamine (DA) and uric acid (UA)Dopamine (DA) is an important neurotransmitter, which plays a sig-

nificant role in the central nervous, renal, hormonal, and cardiovascularsystems [69]. Its detection has gained significant attention. Due to theoverlapping voltammetric response between DA and its coexistingascorbic acid (AA) and uric acid (UA), it is a challenge to distinguishthe coexistence of DA, AA, and UA in a biological environment [34]. Xuet al. applied a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) modifiedLIG for a highly selective electrochemical dopamine (DA) sensor inthe presence of ascorbic acid (AA) and uric acid (UA) with high se-lectivity, sensitivity of 0.22 ± 0.01 μA/μM and a low detection limitof 0.33 μΜ [70]. PEDOT, a conducting polymer was electrodepositedon the LIG electrodes to promote electron transfer responses inelectrochemical sensors due to its high electrical conductivity,high stability and excellent biocompatibility [71,72]. The PEDOT-LIG electrodes demonstrate great potential for biosensors, as wellas other integrated bioelectronic devices. Nayak et al. reported Ptnanoparticles decorated LIG for electrochemical sensors that can si-multaneously detect biomarkers including AA, DA and UA with highsensitivity of 250.69 μA mM−1 cm−2 (AA), 6995.6 μA mM−1 cm−2

(DA) and 8289 μA mM−1 cm−2 (UA) and selectivity in a wide con-centration range, Fig. 4 [33]. The 3D macro/mesoporous LIG withabundant edge plane sites and large electrochemical surface area,facilitates ion diffusion and leads to efficient electron transfer. ThePt nanoparticles were then simply electrodeposited on the surfaceof LIG to improve electron transfer and sensitivity of the sensor.

3.2.2. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)Hydrogen peroxide, one of the most commonmolecules in biolog-

ical tissue is a general enzymatic product of oxidases and a substrateof peroxidases [73,74]. Hydrogen peroxide plays an important rolein physiological processes such as diabetes, lung disease, cancer,neurodegenaration and aging [75]. Therefore, it is of great interest todevelop an effective, easy, real-time and accurate H2O2 detectiontechnology. Nanoparticles decoration on the surface of graphene hasbeen reported as an effective approach for non-enzymatic H2O2 detec-tion [76]. Zhang et al. reported a simple and low cost non-enzymaticelectrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) with Pt deco-rated LIG electrode (Pt/LIG), which exhibited an improved electro-chemical performance with a limit of detection of 0.1 mM and asensitivity of 248.4 mA mM−1 cm−2 [77].

3.2.3. UreaUrea measurement has been attracting great attention due to its re-

lations with the health hazards such as kidney dysfunction [78], cardio-vascular events [79], and environment events [80,81]. Sharma et al.fabricated a pH-based, flexible and catheter-compatible urea sensorbased on modified LIG, which can successfully detect urea concentra-tions as low as 10−4 M with a response time of less than one minute,Fig. 5(a) [82]. By electrodepositing the chitosan hydrogel films on thesurface of LIG, the quantity of the immobilized urease enzyme can beimproved due to the electrostatic and covalent immobilization strate-gies of chitosan. These urease enzymes can catalyze the hydrolysis ofurea into carbon dioxide and ammonia [83], which simply can be de-tected with a direct pH indicator paper. The low-cost materials and in-struments make this technique attractive to a large range of potentialusers.

3.2.4. ThrombinFenzl et al. demonstrated a universal modification route of LIG

electrodes for electrochemical biosensor as shown in Fig. 5(b). Thesensor exhibits a low thrombin detection limits of 1 pM in bufferand 5 pM in the complex matrix of serum [84]. After fabricatingLIG with a CO2 laser on commercial PI, the 1-pyrenebutyric acid(PBA) was immobilized to the surface of LIG via π-stacking and hy-drophobic interactions and then amino-functionalized bioreceptorswere conjugated to the carboxyl groups of PBA using standard cou-pling chemistry [84]. Avoiding the existing complex sensors andmethods, this modification strategy is an effective approach for de-veloping sensitive, flexible and miniaturized LIG sensors for ad-vanced clinical diagnostics.

3.2.5. Bisphenol ABisphenol A (BPA) is a monomer broadly used in diverse consumer

products and its concentration in water is significant for evaluatingwater quality and risk levels of human health and environment[85,86]. Hu et al. presented a facile method to fabricate BPA sensorswith a limit of detection of 58.28 aM and a response time of 20 s onthe flexible PI by dual-beam direct laser writing, demonstrating an ef-fective approach for low-cost practical sensing for on-site environmen-tal monitoring (Fig. 5b-c) [87]. A 1030-nm femtosecond (fs) laser(400 fs, 120 kHz) and a 532 nm continuouswave (CW) laser were com-bined for the fabrication of the LIG, integrating both themultiphoton ef-fect and the thermal effect of laser [88], to irradiate a commercialflexible PI sheet under ambient conditions. After plasma treatment,the LIG electrode were functionalized with receptor incubation and

Page 6: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

Fig. 3. (a) Schematic illustration for the laser treatment of the Cd2+-containing polyethersulfone (PES) on indium−tin oxide (ITO), (LI-CdS-G@ITO) photoelectrode. (b) The photograph ofCd2+-PES on ITO (left) and LI-CdS-G@ ITO (right). (c) Principle of the Photoelectrochemical (PEC) Cu2+ sensor on LI-CdS-G@ITO photoanode. Reproducedwith permission [66]. Copyright2019, JohnWiley and Sons. (d) Photographoffive LIG solid contact ion-selective electrodes (SC-ISEs) on a single polyimide swatch and the illustration of SC-ISE ion sensing. (e) Soil columnstudies with LIG SC-ISEs compared to commercial ion probes. Representative real time plots of NH4+ and NO3− ions during soil column flush experiments. Reproduced with permission[17]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.

6 Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

uncovered surface blocking process, which minimized the non-specificbinding [89]. Capacitive sensing based on AC electroosmotic (ACEO)was applied to detect the binding of BPA with aptamer on the electrodesurface, since the variation of the interface properties can trigger theshift of the interfacial capacitance [87].

3.2.6. GlucoseTehrani et al. developed a sensitive, enzyme-less glucose sensor

based on LIG decorated with copper nanocubes (CuNCs). The sensorshows a linear behavior in the range of 0.25 μM - 4 mM, an excellentsensitivity of 4532.2 μA mM−1.cm2 and a low detection limit of250 nM as well as a rapid amperometric response of less than 3s [90].This sensor demonstrates great potential for glucose detection in tears,saliva, sweat, and partial in urine. The porous LIG with an abundanceof crystallographic defects and large surface area enhances theelectroplating process of the CuNCs (as the catalyst for oxidation of glu-cose) and increases loading of the highly reactive CuNCs as well as ac-cessibility of glucose molecules. The oxidation of glucose at the CuNCsmodified electrode may occur in the following process: (1) the CuNCswere oxidized into CuO in the alkaline media; (2) CuO is electrochemi-cally oxidized to Cu(III) species; and (3) glucose is irreversibly oxidizedby the Cu(III) species [91,92].

3.2.7. Biogenic aminesAs an indicator of food safety and quality, biogenic amines (BA) is

the product of microbial metabolism in foods and its level is affectedby temperatures and storage conditions [93,94]. Vanegas et al. reporteda low-cost LIG biosensor for BA detection, which exhibits an averagehistamine sensitivity of 23.3 μA mM−1 with a low detection limit of11.6 μM and a response time of 7.3 s [95]. Following electroplating ofthe copper nanocubes, the modified LIG electrodes were thenbiofunctionalizedwith diamine oxidase (DAO) to provide selectivity to-ward biogenic amines since DAO enzyme can catalytically deaminatethe primary amines, diamines, and substituted amines to aldehyde, am-monia, andhydrogenperoxide [34], which are then readily decomposedat a working electrode polarized at +500mV and produce an oxidativecurrent [95]. The decorated LIG biosensors were successfully used tomeasure the total BA concentration in fish paste samples subjected tofermentation with lactic acid bacteria, demonstrating its great potentialfor screening food samples, diminishing food waste and reducing thechance of foodborne disease outbreaks [95].

3.3. LIG-based sensors for nucleic acids

MicroRNAs (miRNAs, ~22 nucleotides), small noncoding single-stranded RNA molecules play regulatory roles in cell development and

Page 7: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

Fig. 4. Schematic illustration of the fabrication of LIG and Pt/LIG electrode patterns on PI sheet. (a) Fabrication of arrays of electrodes on PI sheet by laser scribing. (b) 3D view of the LIGelectrodepattern. The projection displays vertical cross-sectional SEM image of a laser-scribed PI sheet showing porous andprotrudedmorphologyof graphene. (c) Selective passivation ofelectrode area by a PDMS. (d) Electrodeposition of Pt nanoparticles selectively on the working electrode area. The projection displays SEM image of homogeneously anchored Ptnanoparticles over graphene sheets. (e) Digital photograph of patterned electrode arrays on PI sheet. (f-k) Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) at LIG at different concentrations of(f) AA, (g) DA, and (h) UA in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0) as supporting electrolyte. DPV at Pt/LIG for various concentrations of (i) AA in a mixture of 4 × 10 −6 M DA and 4 × 10 −6 M UA,(j) DA in a mixture of 30 × 10 −6 M AA and 4 × 10 −6 M UA, (k) UA in a mixture of 40 × 10 −6 M AA and 4 × 10 −6 M DA, Insets: plots of the oxidation peak current density versusconcentration of each biomarker. Linear fitting is used to determine the sensitivity of the electrodes for each biomarker. Reproduced with permission [33]. Copyright 2016, John Wileyand Sons.

7Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

are significant biomarkers for cancer and other diseases [96,97]. We re-cently reported a sensitive LIG biosensor for femtomolar microRNA(miRNA) detection shown in Fig. 6(a-c) [65]. With laser treatment onPI, the LIG with an effective N-doping (2.4% - 4.5%) contributes to thelow resistance of LIG and likely improves the affinity with nucleicacids. This self‑nitrogen-doped porous LIG was patterned as an

electrode for electrochemical sensing. Combined with the miRNA ex-traction and magnetic isolation process, specific purified miRNAs weredirectly adsorbed on the surface of LIG electrode and then electrochem-ically quantified. The detection ofmiRNAup to a concentration as low as10 f. with excellent reproducibility can be achieved, indicating the greatpotential for miRNA detection in biomedical applications.

Page 8: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

Fig. 5. (a) Schematic diagram of enzyme adsorption on LIG with and without chitosan layer. Reproduced under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license[82]. Copyright 2019, Nature Publishing Group. (b) Schematic of the LIG Electrode fabrication, the functionalization process and the electrochemical thrombin detection mechanism.Reproducedwith permission [84]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic of ultrasensitive LIG capacitive sensorswith directedmovement of complex sample particleswith the applied ACEO effect. (d) Detection response of BPA samples as a function of concentration. Reproduced with permission [87]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society.

8 Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

Page 9: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

Fig. 6. The schematic of the LIG biosensor for miRNA detection. (a) The fabrication process of LIG biosensor, the image of the laser written electrode (left), the Raman spectra of the LIG(middle) and the SEM image of the LIG with scale bar 1 μm (right). (b) The absorption process of the purified target miRNA onto the surface of LIG electrode. (c) The electrochemicaltest with LIG working electrode. The typical differential pulse voltammetric(DPV) signals of the LIG adsorbed with RNA decreases in comparison to the bare LIG electrode. Reproducedwith permission [65]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier.

9Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

3.4. LIG-based sensors for immunology

3.4.1. ChloramphenicolCardoso et al. reported a LIG electrochemical biosensor with

molecularly-imprintedmaterial as biorecognition element for detectingchloramphenicol (CAP), which is an antibiotic effective against manybacteria and a commonly found contaminant in the aquatic environ-ment, Fig. 7(a-c) [98]. The biorecognition elements were assembledon the surface of LIG with molecularly-imprinted polymer (MIP) tech-nology as the following procedures: (1) electrochemically polymeriza-tion of the 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) in the electrodesensing area to render a homogeneous surface; (2) incubation in0.01 M 4-aminothiophenol (4-AMP) to ensure the bonding betweenPEDOT and the MIP layer; (3) electropolymerization of functionalmonomers eriochrome black T (EBT) in the presence of the templateCAP; (4) the removal of CAP template by incubating the sensing layerin acetonitrile (CAN) and performing consecutive cyclic voltammetry(CV) scanning [98]. This LIG biosensor exhibits the linear responsefrom 1 nM to 10 mM, a high sensitivity with a limit of detection of0.62 nM and good selectivity, representing a promising approach forthe future of on-site analysis in different contexts, including environ-ment, industrial and health applications [98].

3.4.2. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitorA reliable and sensitive detection of the acetylcholinesterase (AChE)

inhibitor is highly on demanded because the inhibition of AChE contrib-utes to the continuously stimulation of the nerve conduction [99]. Geet al. report a rapid and stable photoelectrochemical (PEC) enzymaticbiosensor based on a TiO2 decorated LIG on ITO glass, demonstratingsensitive detection of an AChE inhibitor (15.4 pM) shown in Fig. 7(d-e) [99]. Considering that the graphene/TiO2 composites can extend thelight absorption range and improve efficiency of electron–hole pair dis-association and electron collection [100,101], the TiO2-decorated LIGphotoelectrodes were fabricated by laser treatment of Ti4+−containingpoly (amic acid) (Ti4+-PAA) on the surface of an ITO. The photocurrentoutput can be significantly enhanced by incubating acetylthiocholine(ATCl)withAChEbecause theAChE can catalyzehydrolysis of ATCl, pro-ducing thiocholine as an ideal hole scavenger [102]. Conversely, an ob-vious photocurrent decrease is noticed when the AChE inhibitor was

involved to impaired enzymatic activity of AChE. In this way, the LIGphotoelectrode could be used for sensitive photoelectrochemical bio-sensing, demonstrating a simple approach for free-standing photo-electrodes of various applications.

4. Laser induced graphene for multimodal sensor

The general biosensors that are specifically designed for a certainphysical/chemical parameter, can be totally irresponsive to other pa-rameters [103]. In order to provides amore comprehensive perspective,signals from chemical sensors and physical sensor are normally incor-porated [104]. However, the incorporation process usually involvesmultiple complicated integration of diverse materials and layers,which may prevent mass-production and deteriorate the sensing accu-racy of the devices [105]. Compared to the biosensor that are specificallydesigned for one variable while totally irresponsive to other variables,integrated biosensor assays had been reported tomeasuremultiple var-iables at one time [103,106]. The LIG technology by being based on onemain precursor and the laser direct writing process, variousmultimodalsensors can be fabricated in a straightforwardmanner, avoiding the po-tential deterioration on device performance and complicated integra-tion optimization.

Recently, wearable sweat sensors had drawn much attentions[107,108], due to its rapid, continuous and non-invasive health moni-toring for a wealth of physiologically relevant information [109]. Gaoet al. reported a wearable hybrid sweat sensor, consisting of tempera-ture sensor, strain sensor, and uric acid (UA) and tyrosine (Tyr) sensorthat are all based on LIG, Fig. 8(a-h) [105]. For temperature sensing,the conductivity of LIG was enhanced with the increased temperatureowing to increased electron–phonon scattering and thermal velocityof electrons in the sandwiched layers [110]. For strain sensing, the po-rous structure under an external strain will deform and enhance con-tacts, resulting in a decreased resistance. The rapid and accuratedetection of UA and Tyr in human sweat in situ, which are relatedwith diabetes, gout, metabolic disorders and other diseases wasachieved due to fast electron mobility, high current density and ultralarge surface area of LIG [105]. To continuously measure temperature,respiration rate and low concentrations of UA and Tyr, a microfluidicplatform was engraved on PI film with the laser for dynamic sweat

Page 10: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

10 Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

Page 11: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

Fig. 8. (a)Multiple functions of the sensor: ultrasensitive sweat UA and Tyr detection, sweat rate estimation, temperature sensing and vital-sign (for example, heart rate and respirationrate) monitoring. (b) Photographic image of a flexible lab-on-skin patch. Scale bar, 1 cm. (c-d) SEM images of the LIG for chemical sensing. Scale bars, 200 μm (c) and 3 μm (d). (e-f)Mechanisms of temperature sensing (e) and strain sensing (f) using LIG. (g-h) UA (g) and Tyr (h) detection with the LIG in a 0.01 M ABS solution. Insets are the correspondingcalibration plots. Curr., current. Reproduced with permission [105]. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature. (i) The schematic drawing of multilayered working electrodes. Reproduced withpermission [106]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier. (j) Schematic of the fabrication of surface sensing process, including the fabrication of LIG electrodes, the Au coating, PANI coating and rGOcoating. Reproduced with permission [103]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.

11Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

sampling [105]. This entirely laser engraved sensor, which facilitatescalable manufacture and flexibility for the wearer's comfort, was vali-dated in physically trained and untrained subjects and demonstratedits potential for monitoring gout.

Park et al. demonstrated stretchable and flexible device with modi-fied LIG electrodes formonitoring the glucose level in sweat, pH sensing,and electrocardiogram (ECG), Fig. 8(i) [106]. The silver nanowire(AgNW) film were prepared between the PDMS and LIG to enhancethe electrical conductivity. The platinum and gold nanoparticles(PtAuNP) were deposited on the 3D porous LIG to improve the electro-chemical performance by enhancing the electron transfer rate and cata-lytic activity [111,112]. The various functional layers were deposited onthese LIG electrodes for sensing. For glucose sensing, the glucose oxi-dase enzymewas drop-cast onto the surface, exhibiting a low detectionlimit (5 μM) and a high linearity (0.99). For pH sensor, the PANI filmwere electrodeposited as a pH sensing membrane, showing a linear re-sponse (66 mV/pH) in the range from 4 to 7. For ECG sensor, the LIGelectrodes were utilized to detect the small electric current generatedby the contracting muscle for ECG signals, which provide useful

Fig. 7. (a) Schematic representation of the workflow employed on theMIP fabrication for the eformation of poly (EDOT), followed by amination, electropolymerization of EBT, in the presencSpectroscopy (EIS) measurements of MIP devices (left) and the corresponding calibration cuthe photoelectrochemical biosensing on TiO2-decorated LIG on the surface of an ITO(b) acetylcholinesterase (AChE), (c) acetylthiocholine (ATCl), (d) AChE + ATCl, (e) 0.1 ng mCP-pretreated AChE + ATCl. Reproduced with permission [99]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society

information about cardiovascular conditions [106]. The integrated bio-sensors demonstrate the potential of this novel fabrication techniqueand stretchable LIG metal nanocomposite for wearableelectrochemical-physiological hybrid biosensors [106].

Beside sweat sensor, Hu et al. reported amultiflavor sensing system,which was fabricated on PI using a laser direct witting and functional-ized with gold nanoparticles, reduced-graphene oxide, and polyanilinefor sensing NaCl, sugar, and vinegar, Fig. 8(j) [103]. In this sensor, theporous LIG as the electrode provides a large surface to volume ratioand achieves a high sensitivity. Gold nanoparticles were deposited toimprove the conductivity of the sensor and enhance its sensitivity[113]. Reduced graphene oxide composing a high density of edge-plane-like defect sites was dropped onto the electrode's surface andserved as the positive site in electron transfer to chemical and biologicalspecies [114], responding differently to Na+, Cl−, H+, CH3COO− ionsand sugar molecular. PANI, a conductive polymer, was employed tomodify the surface of LIG to detect vinegar solution, NaCl and sugarfor its ion selectivity [115–117]. By applying principal component anal-ysis, this sensing system shows a high sensitivity and selectivity with

lectrochemical biosensor for detection of CAP: electrodeposition of EDOT with subsequente of CAP or without CAP, and finally template removal. (b-c) Electrochemical Impedancerves (right). Reproduced with permission [98]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. (d) Principle of. (e) Photocurrents of the LIG biosensor in (a) blank PBS and PBS containing

L−1 chlorpyrifos (CP)-pretreated AChE + ATCl, (f) 0.1 ng mL−1 CP, and (g) 1.0 ng mL−1

of Chemistry.

Page 12: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

12 Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

the detection limit of 0.1 mM for NaCl and sugar solutions, and 10−4

times diluted commercial table vinegar solution (5% acetic acid) [103].

5. Conclusions and outlook

In this paper, we first discussed the fabrication of LIG, the mecha-nism and the strategies to engineer the properties of LIG by the regula-tion of laser parameters, atmosphere, doping and surface modification.Due to the 3D porous structure, the good conductivity of LIG, and thesimple fabrication with laser patterning process in laboratory and in-dustrial scale, various state-of-the-art LIG biosensors have been re-ported in the literature and summarized in this review. The LIGelectrodes were employed directly or were modified with ion-selective membranes, catalytic nanoparticles, aptamer or enzyme forsensing (AA, DA, UA, H2O2, Urea, BA, ions, PBA, BPA, CAP and AChE in-hibitor). In the end, the integrated LIG biosensors combining severalsensing functions (temperature, strain, glucose, microfluids, pH, ECG,muti-flavors) were also demonstrated. Considering that the researchin this field is still in infancy and is advancing with a rapid pace, thereis plenty of room for further development of LIG biosensors for detect-ing biomarkers such as DNAs, RNAs, proteins, peptides as well aswhole cells. Also, the performance of LIG such as its electrocatalytic ac-tivity can be optimized by controlling the porosity, composition, mor-phology or surface modification. Currently, most LIGs are fabricated bylaser ablation directly under ambient air condition. When the powerdensity of incident laser exceeds the threshold ionization of dielectricmedia, the plasma can be generated on the focal surface, resulting in asubsequent combination of thermal andmechanical shock on themate-rials [118]. For high-power laser induced plasma, the plasma can be in-duced by the laser and subsequently focuses on the sample surface,producing the LIG immersed in a dielectric medium such as water[119]. To date, most current measurements rely on electrochemicaltest. Other methods of analysis such as fluorescence or field-effecttransistor-based biosensor should also be explored for LIG biosensing.We expectmuchmoremultifunctional LIG biosensorswill be developedin the near future because of the beauty of this simple fabrication pro-cess of laser directwriting and thematuring functionalization strategiesfor multiplexing. Finally, a LIG biosensor could be integrated with otherflexible LIG devices such as supercapacitor for potential one-stepmanufactured portable electronics for applications in safety, healthcare and environment monitoring.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financialinterests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influ-ence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the funding support of Australian ResearchCouncil Industry Transformational Research Hub (IH 180100002).

References

[1] S. Szunerits, R. Boukherroub, Graphene-based biosensors, Interface Focus 8 (3)(2018) 20160132.

[2] M. Pumera, Graphene in biosensing, Mater. Today 14 (7–8) (2011) 308–315.[3] S. Viswanathan, T.N. Narayanan, K. Aran, K.D. Fink, J. Paredes, P.M. Ajayan, S.

Filipek, P. Miszta, H.C. Tekin, F. Inci, U. Demirci, P. Li, K.I. Bolotin, D. Liepmann, V.Renugopalakrishanan, Graphene–protein field effect biosensors: glucose sensing,Mater. Today 18 (9) (2015) 513–522.

[4] S. Lin, W. Feng, X. Miao, X. Zhang, S. Chen, Y. Chen, W. Wang, Y. Zhang, A flexibleand highly sensitive nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on DVD-laser scribedgraphene substrate, Biosens. Bioelectron. 110 (2018) 89–96.

[5] S.S. Low, H.S. Loh, J.S. Boey, P.S. Khiew, W.S. Chiu, M.T.T. Tan, Sensitivity enhance-ment of graphene/zinc oxide nanocomposite-based electrochemical impedance

genosensor for single stranded RNA detection, Biosens. Bioelectron. 94 (2017)365–373.

[6] M.H. Haque, V. Gopalan, S. Yadav, M.N. Islam, E. Eftekhari, Q. Li, L.G. Carrascosa, N.T.Nguyen, A.K. Lam, M.J.A. Shiddiky, Detection of regional DNA methylation usingDNA-graphene affinity interactions, Biosens. Bioelectron. 87 (2017) 615–621.

[7] L.J. He, Q. Wang, D. Mandler, M.S. Li, R. Boukherroub, S. Szunerits, Detection of folicacid protein in human serum using reduced graphene oxide electrodes modifiedby folic-acid, Biosens. Bioelectron. 75 (2016) 389–395.

[8] L. He, Q. Pagneux, I. Larroulet, A.Y. Serrano, A. Pesquera, A. Zurutuza, D. Mandler, R.Boukherroub, S. Szunerits, Label-free femtomolar cancer biomarker detection inhuman serum using graphene-coated surface plasmon resonance chips, Biosens.Bioelectron. 89 (2017) 606–611.

[9] G. Xu, Z.A. Jarjes, H.W. Wang, A.R.J. Phillips, P.A. Kilmartin, J. Travas-Sejdic, Detec-tion of neurotransmitters by three-dimensional laser-scribed graphene grass elec-trodes, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (49) (2018) 42136–42145.

[10] K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S.V. Dubonos, I.V.Grigorieva, A.A. Firsov, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, Science306 (5696) (2004) 666–669.

[11] S. Bae, H. Kim, Y. Lee, X. Xu, J.S. Park, Y. Zheng, J. Balakrishnan, T. Lei, H.R. Kim, Y.I.Song, Y.J. Kim, K.S. Kim, B. Ozyilmaz, J.H. Ahn, B.H. Hong, S. Iijima, Roll-to-roll pro-duction of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes, Nat. Nanotechnol. 5(8) (2010) 574–578.

[12] S.J. Wang, Y. Geng, Q. Zheng, J.-K. Kim, Fabrication of highly conducting and trans-parent graphene films, Carbon 48 (6) (2010) 1815–1823.

[13] D. Voiry, J. Yang, J. Kupferberg, R. Fullon, C. Lee, H.Y. Jeong, H.S. Shin, M. Chhowalla,High-quality graphene via microwave reduction of solution-exfoliated grapheneoxide, Science 353 (6306) (2016) 1413–1416.

[14] S. Wang, X. Ouyang, Z. Feng, Y. Cao, M. Gu, X. Li, Diffractive photonic applicationsmediated by laser reduced graphene oxides, Opto-Electr. Adv. 1 (2) (2018)17000201–17000208.

[15] Z.F. Wan, S.J. Wang, B. Haylock, J. Kaur, P. Tanner, D. Thiel, R. Sang, I.S. Cole, X.P. Li,M. Lobino, Q. Li, Tuning the sub-processes in laser reduction of graphene oxide byadjusting the power and scanning speed of laser, Carbon 141 (2019) 83–91.

[16] R. Rahimi, M. Ochoa,W. Yu, B. Ziaie, Highly stretchable and sensitive unidirectionalstrain sensor via laser carbonization, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 (8) (2015)4463–4470.

[17] N.T. Garland, E.S. McLamore, N.D. Cavallaro, D. Mendivelso-Perez, E.A. Smith, D.Jing, J.C. Claussen, Flexible laser-induced Graphene for nitrogen sensing in soil,ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (45) (2018) 39124–39133.

[18] S.D. Luo, P.T. Hoang, T. Liu, Direct laser writing for creating porous graphitic struc-tures and their use for flexible and highly sensitive sensor and sensor arrays, Car-bon 96 (2016) 522–531.

[19] A.F. Carvalho, A.J.S. Fernandes, C. Leitão, J. Deuermeier, A.C. Marques, R. Martins, E.Fortunato, F.M. Costa, Laser-induced Graphene strain sensors produced by ultravi-olet irradiation of polyimide, Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 (52) (2018) 1805271.

[20] M. Dosi, I. Lau, Y.C. Zhuang, D.S.A. Simakov, M.W. Fowler, M.A. Pope, Ultrasensitiveelectrochemical methane sensors based on solid polymer electrolyte-infused laser-induced Graphene, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 (6) (2019) 6166–6173.

[21] M.G. Stanford, K. Yang, Y. Chyan, C. Kittrell, J.M. Tour, Laser-induced Graphene forflexible and embeddable gas sensors, ACS Nano 13 (3) (2019) 3474–3482.

[22] L.Q. Tao, H. Tian, Y. Liu, Z.Y. Ju, Y. Pang, Y.Q. Chen, D.Y.Wang, X.G. Tian, J.C. Yan, N.Q.Deng, Y. Yang, T.L. Ren, An intelligent artificial throat with sound-sensing abilitybased on laser induced graphene, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 14579.

[23] S.P. Singh, Y. Li, A. Be’er, Y. Oren, J.M. Tour, C.J. Arnusch, Laser-induced Graphenelayers and electrodes prevents microbial fouling and exerts antimicrobial action,ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (21) (2017) 18238–18247.

[24] M.G. Stanford, J.T. Li, Y.D. Chen, E.A. McHugh, A. Liopo, H. Xiao, J.M. Tour, Self-sterilizing laser-induced Graphene bacterial air filter, ACS Nano 13 (10) (2019)11912–11920.

[25] J. Xu, M. Wang, N.P. Wickramaratne, M. Jaroniec, S. Dou, L. Dai, High-performancesodium ion batteries based on a 3D anode from nitrogen-doped Graphene foams,Adv. Mater. 27 (12) (2015) 2042–2048.

[26] F. Wang, X. Dong, K. Wang, W. Duan, M. Gao, Z. Zhai, C. Zhu, W. Wang, Laser-induced nitrogen-doped hierarchically porous graphene for advanced electro-chemical energy storage, Carbon 150 (2019) 396–407.

[27] R.Z. Li, J. Yan, Y.M. Fang, X.Y. Fan, L.K. Sheng, D.Y. Ding, X.X. Yin, Y. Yu, Laser-scribedLossy microstrip lines for radio frequency applications, Appl. Sci.-Basel 9 (3)(2019) 415.

[28] W. Li, C. Tan, M.A. Lowe, H.D. Abruna, D.C. Ralph, Electrochemistry of individualmonolayer Graphene sheets, ACS Nano 5 (3) (2011) 2264–2270.

[29] S. Banerjee, J. Shim, J. Rivera, X.Z. Jin, D. Estrada, V. Solovyeva, X. You, J. Pak, E. Pop,N. Aluru, R. Bashir, Electrochemistry at the edge of a single Graphene layer in ananopore, ACS Nano 7 (1) (2013) 834–843.

[30] M.Y.Wu, S.J. Meng, Q.Wang,W.L. Si, W. Huang, X.C. Dong, Nickel-cobalt oxide dec-orated three-dimensional Graphene as an enzyme mimic for glucose and calciumdetection, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 (38) (2015) 21089–21094.

[31] X.C. Dong, H. Xu, X.W. Wang, Y.X. Huang, M.B. Chan-Park, H. Zhang, L.H. Wang, W.Huang, P. Chen, 3D Graphene-cobalt oxide electrode for high-performancesupercapacitor and enzymeless glucose detection, ACS Nano 6 (4) (2012)3206–3213.

[32] H.-J. Qiu, Y. Guan, P. Luo, Y. Wang, Recent advance in fabricatingmonolithic 3D po-rous graphene and their applications in biosensing and biofuel cells, Biosens.Bioelectron. 89 (2017) 85–95.

[33] P. Nayak, N. Kurra, C. Xia, H.N. Alshareef, Highly efficient laser scribed Grapheneelectrodes for on-Chip electrochemical sensing applications, Adv. Electr. Mater. 2(10) (2016) 1600185.

Page 13: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

13Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

[34] Y.Y. Shao, J. Wang, H. Wu, J. Liu, I.A. Aksay, Y.H. Lin, Graphene based electrochem-ical sensors and biosensors: a review, Electroanalysis 22 (10) (2010) 1027–1036.

[35] Z. Peng, J. Lin, R. Ye, E.L. Samuel, J.M. Tour, Flexible and stackable laser-inducedgraphene supercapacitors, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 (5) (2015) 3414–3419.

[36] H. Wu, W. Zhang, S. Kandambeth, O. Shekhah, M. Eddaoudi, H.N. Alshareef, Con-ductive metal–organic frameworks selectively grown on laser-scribed Graphenefor electrochemical Microsupercapacitors, Adv. Energy Mater. 9 (21) (2019)1900482.

[37] J. Lin, Z. Peng, Y. Liu, F. Ruiz-Zepeda, R. Ye, E.L. Samuel, M.J. Yacaman, B.I. Yakobson,J.M. Tour, Laser-induced porous graphene films from commercial polymers, Nat.Commun. 5 (2014) 5714.

[38] R.Q. Ye, D.K. James, J.M. Tour, Laser-induced Graphene: from discovery to transla-tion, Adv. Mater. 31 (1) (2019).

[39] M.A. Pimenta, G. Dresselhaus, M.S. Dresselhaus, L.G. Cançado, A. Jorio, R. Saito,Studying disorder in graphite-based systems by Raman spectroscopy, Phys.Chem. Chem. Phys. 9 (11) (2007) 1276–1290.

[40] J. Cai, C. Lv, A.Watanabe, Laser direct writing and selectivemetallization ofmetalliccircuits for integrated wireless devices, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (1) (2018)915–924.

[41] J. Zhang, T. Zhou, L. Wen, A. Zhang, Fabricating metallic circuit patterns on polymersubstrates through laser and selective metallization, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(49) (2016) 33999–34007.

[42] Z.F. Wan, E.W. Streed, M. Lobino, S.J. Wang, R.T. Sang, I.S. Cole, D.V. Thiel, Q. Li,Laser-reduced Graphene: synthesis, properties, and applications, Adv. Mater.Technol. 3 (4) (2018) 1700315.

[43] Y. Chyan, R. Ye, Y. Li, S.P. Singh, C.J. Arnusch, J.M. Tour, Laser-induced Graphene bymultiple lasing: toward electronics on cloth, Paper, and Food, ACS Nano 12 (3)(2018) 2176–2183.

[44] R. Ye, Y. Chyan, J. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Han, C. Kittrell, J.M. Tour, Laser-induced Grapheneformation on wood, Adv. Mater. 29 (37) (2017) 1702211.

[45] W.L. Zhang, Y.J. Lei, F.W. Ming, Q. Jiang, P.M.F.J. Costa, H.N. Alshareef, Lignin laserlithography: a direct-write method for fabricating 3D Graphene electrodes formicrosupercapacitors, Adv. Energy Mater. 8 (27) (2018) 1801840.

[46] Z. Zhang, M. Song, J. Hao, K. Wu, C. Li, C. Hu, Visible light laser-induced graphenefrom phenolic resin: a new approach for directly writing graphene-based electro-chemical devices on various substrates, Carbon 127 (2018) 287–296.

[47] M.F. El-Kady, R.B. Kaner, Scalable fabrication of high-power graphene micro-supercapacitors for flexible and on-chip energy storage, Nat. Commun. 4 (2013)1475.

[48] R.Q. Ye, D.K. James, J.M. Tour, Laser-induced Graphene, Acc. Chem. Res. 51 (7)(2018) 1609–1620.

[49] H.L. Liu, Y. Tang, Y.X. Xie, L.S. Lu, Z.P. Wan, W.J. Tang, L.F. Yang, D.Y. Yang, Effect ofpulsed Nd:YAG laser processing parameters on surface properties of polyimidefilms, Surf. Coat. Technol. 361 (2019) 102–111.

[50] Y. Li, D.X. Luong, J. Zhang, Y.R. Tarkunde, C. Kittrell, F. Sargunaraj, Y. Ji, C.J. Arnusch,J.M. Tour, Laser-induced Graphene in controlled atmospheres: fromSuperhydrophilic to Superhydrophobic surfaces, Adv. Mater. 29 (27) (2017)1700496.

[51] A. Tiliakos, C. Ceaus, S.M. Iordache, E. Vasile, I. Stamatin, Morphic transitions ofnanocarbons via laser pyrolysis of polyimide films, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 121(2016) 275–286.

[52] C.E. Banks, R.G. Compton, Exploring the electrocatalytic sites of carbon nanotubesfor NADH detection: an edge plane pyrolytic graphite electrode study, Analyst130 (9) (2005) 1232–1239.

[53] A.P. Turner, Tech.Sight. Biochemistry. Biosensors–sense and sensitivity, Science290 (5495) (2000) 1315–1317.

[54] S. Wu, Q. He, C. Tan, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, Graphene-based electrochemical sensors,Small 9 (8) (2013) 1160–1172.

[55] Z. Peng, R. Ye, J.A. Mann, D. Zakhidov, Y. Li, P.R. Smalley, J. Lin, J.M. Tour, Flexibleboron-doped laser-induced Graphene Microsupercapacitors, ACS Nano 9 (6)(2015) 5868–5875.

[56] R. Ye, Z. Peng, T. Wang, Y. Xu, J. Zhang, Y. Li, L.G. Nilewski, J. Lin, J.M. Tour, In situformation of metal oxide nanocrystals embedded in laser-induced Graphene,ACS Nano 9 (9) (2015) 9244–9251.

[57] S. Deng, G. Jian, J. Lei, Z. Hu, H. Ju, A glucose biosensor based on direct electrochem-istry of glucose oxidase immobilized on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes,Biosens. Bioelectron. 25 (2) (2009) 373–377.

[58] K. Gong, F. Du, Z. Xia, M. Durstock, L. Dai, Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube arrayswith high electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction, Science 323 (5915) (2009)760–764.

[59] Y. Wang, Y. Shao, D.W. Matson, J. Li, Y. Lin, Nitrogen-doped graphene and its appli-cation in electrochemical biosensing, ACS Nano 4 (4) (2010) 1790–1798.

[60] C. Shan, H. Yang, D. Han, Q. Zhang, A. Ivaska, L. Niu, Electrochemical determinationof NADH and ethanol based on ionic liquid-functionalized graphene, Biosens.Bioelectron. 25 (6) (2010) 1504–1508.

[61] L. Li, J. Zhang, Z. Peng, Y. Li, C. Gao, Y. Ji, R. Ye, N.D. Kim, Q. Zhong, Y. Yang, H. Fei, G.Ruan, J.M. Tour, High-performance Pseudocapacitive microsupercapacitors fromlaser-induced Graphene, Adv. Mater. 28 (5) (2016) 838–845.

[62] H. Chang, L. Tang, Y. Wang, J. Jiang, J. Li, Graphene fluorescence resonance energytransfer aptasensor for the thrombin detection, Anal. Chem. 82 (6) (2010)2341–2346.

[63] D. Du, L. Wang, Y. Shao, J. Wang, M.H. Engelhard, Y. Lin, Functionalized grapheneoxide as a nanocarrier in a multienzyme labeling amplification strategy for ultra-sensitive electrochemical immunoassay of phosphorylated p53 (S392), Anal.Chem. 83 (3) (2011) 746–752.

[64] J. Chmiola, C. Largeot, P.L. Taberna, P. Simon, Y. Gogotsi, Monolithic carbide-derivedcarbon films for micro-supercapacitors, Science 328 (5977) (2010) 480–483.

[65] Z.F. Wan, M. Umer, M. Lobino, D. Thiel, N.T. Nguyen, A. Trinchi, M.J.A. Shiddiky, Y.S.Gao, Q. Li, Laser induced self-N-doped porous graphene as an electrochemical bio-sensor for femtomolar miRNA detection, Carbon 163 (2020) 385–394.

[66] L. Ge, Q. Hong, H. Li, C.C. Liu, F. Li, Direct-laser-writing of metal Sulfide-GrapheneNanocomposite Photoelectrode toward sensitive Photoelectrochemical sensing,Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 (38) (2019) 10.

[67] H. Wang, H. Ye, B. Zhang, F. Zhao, B. Zeng, Electrostatic interaction mechanismbased synthesis of a Z-scheme BiOI–CdS photocatalyst for selective and sensitivedetection of Cu2+, J. Mater. Chem. A 5 (21) (2017) 10599–10608.

[68] I.S. Kucherenko, D. Sanborn, B. Chen, N. Garland, M. Serhan, E. Forzani, C. Gomes,J.C. Claussen, Ion-selective sensors based on laser-induced Graphene for evaluatinghuman hydration levels using urine samples, Adv. Mater.Technol. 5 (6) (2020)1901037.

[69] N.G. Shang, P. Papakonstantinou, M. McMullan, M. Chu, A. Stamboulis, A. Potenza,S.S. Dhesi, H. Marchetto, Catalyst-free efficient growth, Orientation and BiosensingProperties of Multilayer Graphene Nanoflake Films with Sharp Edge Planes, Adv.Funct. Mater. 18 (21) (2008) 3506–3514.

[70] G. Xu, Z.A. Jarjes, V. Desprez, P.A. Kilmartin, J. Travas-Sejdic, Sensitive, selective, dis-posable electrochemical dopamine sensor based on PEDOT-modified laser scribedgraphene, Biosens. Bioelectron. 107 (2018) 184–191.

[71] H. Yamato, M. Ohwa, W. Wernet, Stability of polypyrrole and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) for biosensor application, J. Electroanal. Chem. 397 (1)(1995) 163–170.

[72] J.E. Choe, M.S. Ahmed, S. Jeon, Trouble free dopamine sensing by palladium nano-particles fabricated poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) functionalized Graphene, J.Electrochem. Soc. 163 (3) (2016) B113–B118.

[73] M. Zhou, Y. Zhai, S. Dong, Electrochemical sensing and biosensing platform basedon chemically reduced Graphene oxide, Anal. Chem. 81 (14) (2009) 5603–5613.

[74] M. Giorgio, M. Trinei, E. Migliaccio, P.G. Pelicci, Hydrogen peroxide: a metabolic by-product or a common mediator of ageing signals? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8 (9)(2007) 722A–728.

[75] W. Chen, S. Cai, Q.-Q. Ren, W. Wen, Y.-D. Zhao, Recent advances in electrochemicalsensing for hydrogen peroxide: a review, Analyst 137 (1) (2012) 49–58.

[76] E. Aparicio-Martinez, A. Ibarra, I.A. Estrada-Moreno, V. Osuna, R.B. Dominguez,Flexible electrochemical sensor based on laser scribed Graphene/Ag nanoparticlesfor non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide detection, Sensors Actuat. B-Chem. 301(2019) 8.

[77] Y. Zhang, H. Zhu, P. Sun, C.K. Sun, H. Huang, S. Guan, H. Liu, H. Zhang, C. Zhang, K.R.Qin, Laser-induced Graphene-based non-enzymatic sensor for detection of hydro-gen peroxide, Electroanalysis 31 (7) (2019) 1334–1341.

[78] J. Rysz, A. Gluba-Brzozka, B. Franczyk, Z. Jablonowski, A. Cialkowska-Rysz, Novelbiomarkers in the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease and the prediction of its out-come, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18 (8) (2017).

[79] K. Jujo, Y. Minami, S. Haruki, Y. Matsue, K. Shimazaki, H. Kadowaki, I. Ishida, K.Kambayashi, H. Arashi, H. Sekiguchi, N. Hagiwara, Persistent high blood urea nitro-gen level is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients withacute heart failure, Esc Heart Failure 4 (4) (2017) 545–553.

[80] J.V. Weber, V.I. Sharypov, Ethyl carbamate in foods and beverages: a review, Envi-ron. Chem. Lett. 7 (3) (2009) 233–247.

[81] M.Y. Naz, S.A. Sulaiman, Slow release coating remedy for nitrogen loss from con-ventional urea: a review, J. Control. Release 225 (2016) 109–120.

[82] E.R. Mamleyev, S. Heissler, A. Nefedov, P.G. Weidler, N. Nordin, V.V. Kudryashov, K.Länge, N. MacKinnon, S. Sharma, Laser-induced hierarchical carbon patterns onpolyimide substrates for flexible urea sensors, npj Flexible Electr. 3 (1) (2019) 2.

[83] G. Dhawan, G. Sumana, B.D. Malhotra, Recent developments in urea biosensors,Biochem. Eng. J. 44 (1) (2009) 42–52.

[84] C. Fenzl, P. Nayak, T. Hirsch, O.S. Wolfbeis, H.N. Alshareef, A.J. Baeumner, Laser-scribed Graphene electrodes for Aptamer-based biosensing, Acs Sensors 2 (5)(2017) 616–620.

[85] E.R. Hugo, T.D. Brandebourg, J.G. Woo, J. Loftus, J.W. Alexander, N. Ben-Jonathan,Bisphenol a at environmentally relevant doses inhibits adiponectin release fromhuman adipose tissue explants and adipocytes, Environ. Health Perspect. 116(12) (2008) 1642–1647.

[86] R.R. Newbold, W.N. Jefferson, E. Padilla-Banks, Prenatal exposure to bisphenol a atenvironmentally relevant doses adversely affects the murine female reproductivetract later in life, Environ. Health Perspect. 117 (6) (2009) 879–885.

[87] C. Cheng, S. Wang, J. Wu, Y. Yu, R. Li, S. Eda, J. Chen, G. Feng, B. Lawrie, A. Hu,Bisphenol A Sensors on Polyimide Fabricated by Laser Direct Writing for OnsiteRiver Water Monitoring at Attomolar Concentration, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 8(28) (2016) 17784–17792.

[88] R.Z. Li, R. Peng, K.D. Kihm, S. Bai, D. Bridges, U. Tumuluri, Z. Wu, T. Zhang, G.Compagnini, Z. Feng, A. Hu, High-rate in-plane micro-supercapacitors scribedonto photo paper using in situ femtolaser-reduced graphene oxide/au nanoparti-cle microelectrodes, Energy Environ. Sci. 9 (4) (2016) 1458–1467.

[89] H. Cui, C. Cheng, J. Wu, S. Eda, Rapid detection of progesterone by commerciallyavailable microelectrode chips, SENSORS, 2013, IEEE 2013, pp. 1–4.

[90] F. Tehrani, B. Bavarian, Facile and Scalable Disposable Sensor Based on Laser En-graved Graphene for Electrochemical Detection of Glucose, Scientific Reports 6,2016.

[91] Y.C. Li, F.Y. Huang, J. Chen, T. Mo, S.X. Li, F. Wang, S.Q. Feng, Y.J. Li, A high perfor-mance enzyme-free glucose sensor based on the Graphene-CuO nanocomposites,Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 8 (5) (2013) 6332–6342.

Page 14: Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2020-08-04 · tivity, likely weakening the signal strength of graphene biosensor, they improve its hydrophilicity and provide active sites

14 Z. Wan et al. / Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25 (2020) e00205

[92] D.L. Zhou, J.J. Feng, L.Y. Cai, Q.X. Fang, J.R. Chen, A.J.Wang, Facile synthesis of mono-disperse porous Cu2O nanospheres on reduced graphene oxide for non-enzymaticamperometric glucose sensing, Electrochim. Acta 115 (2014) 103–108.

[93] S.L. Taylor, R.R. Eitenmiller, Histamine food poisoning: toxicology and clinical as-pects, CRC Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 17 (2) (1986) 91–128.

[94] D. Doeun, M. Davaatseren, M.-S. Chung, Biogenic amines in foods, Food Sci.Biotechnol. 26 (6) (2017) 1463–1474.

[95] D.C. Vanegas, L. Patino, C. Mendez, D.A. de Oliveira, A.M. Torres, C.L. Gomes, E.S.McLamore, Laser scribed Graphene biosensor for detection of biogenic amines infood samples using locally sourced materials, Biosensors-Basel 8 (2) (2018).

[96] J. Lu, G. Getz, E.A. Miska, E. Alvarez-Saavedra, J. Lamb, D. Peck, A. Sweet-Cordero,B.L. Ebet, R.H. Mak, A.A. Ferrando, J.R. Downing, T. Jacks, H.R. Horvitz, T.R. Golub,MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers, Nature 435 (7043) (2005)834–838.

[97] N. Rosenfeld, R. Aharonov, E. Meiri, S. Rosenwald, Y. Spector, M. Zepeniuk, H.Benjamin, N. Shabes, S. Tabak, A. Levy, D. Lebanony, Y. Goren, E. Silberschein, N.Targan, A. Ben-Ari, S. Gilad, N. Sion-Vardy, A. Tobar, M. Feinmesser, O. Kharenko,O. Nativ, D. Nass, M. Perelman, A. Yosepovich, B. Shalmon, S. Polak-Charcon, E.Fridman, A. Avniel, I. Bentwich, Z. Bentwich, D. Cohen, A. Chajut, I. Barshack,MicroRNAs accurately identify cancer tissue origin, Nat. Biotechnol. 26 (4)(2008) 462–469.

[98] A.R. Cardoso, A.C. Marques, L. Santos, A.F. Carvalho, F.M. Costa, R. Martins, M.G.F.Sales, E. Fortunato, Molecularly-imprinted chloramphenicol sensor with laser-induced graphene electrodes, Biosens. Bioelectron. 124 (2019) 167–175.

[99] L. Ge, Q. Hong, H. Li, F. Li, A laser-induced TiO2-decorated graphene photoelectrodefor sensitive photoelectrochemical biosensing, Chem. Commun. 55 (34) (2019)4945–4948.

[100] N. Hao, R. Hua, S.B. Chen, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhou, J. Qian, Q. Liu, K.Wang, Multiple signal-amplification via ag and TiO2 decorated 3D nitrogen doped graphene hydrogel forfabricating sensitive label-free photoelectrochemical thrombin aptasensor,Biosens. Bioelectron. 101 (2018) 14–20.

[101] M. Nallal, G. Anantha Iyengar, K. Pill-Lee, New titanium dioxide-basedHeterojunction Nanohybrid for highly selective Photoelectrochemical–electrochemical dual-mode sensors, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (42) (2017)37166–37183.

[102] W.-W. Zhao, S. Shan, Z.-Y. Ma, L.-N. Wan, J.-J. Xu, H.-Y. Chen, Acetylcholine esteraseantibodies on BiOI Nanoflakes/TiO2 nanoparticles electrode: a case of applicationfor general Photoelectrochemical enzymatic analysis, Anal. Chem. 85 (24) (2013)11686–11690.

[103] Y.C. Yu, P.C. Joshi, J. Wu, A.M. Hu, Laser-induced carbon-based smart flexible sensorArray for Multiflavors detection, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (40) (2018)34005–34012.

[104] W. Gao, S. Emaminejad, H.Y.Y. Nyein, S. Challa, K. Chen, A. Peck, H.M. Fahad, H. Ota,H. Shiraki, D. Kiriya, D.H. Lien, G.A. Brooks, R.W. Davis, A. Javey, Fully integrated

wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis, Nature 529(7587) (2016) 509–514.

[105] Y. Yang, Y. Song, X. Bo, J. Min, O.S. Pak, L. Zhu, M. Wang, J. Tu, A. Kogan, H. Zhang,T.K. Hsiai, Z. Li, W. Gao, A laser-engraved wearable sensor for sensitive detection ofuric acid and tyrosine in sweat, Nat. Biotechnol. 38 (2) (2020) 217–224.

[106] X. Xuan, J.Y. Kim, X. Hui, P.S. Das, H.S. Yoon, J.Y. Park, A highly stretchable and con-ductive 3D porous graphene metal nanocomposite based electrochemical-physiological hybrid biosensor, Biosens. Bioelectron. 120 (2018) 160–167.

[107] H. Lee, Y.S. Song, M.S. Hong, H.R. Kim, T. Cho, K. Kang, S.H. Shin, T. Choi, T. Hyeon,D.H. Kim, Wearable/disposable sweat-based glucose monitoring device with mul-tistage transdermal drug delivery module, Sci. Adv. 3 (3) (2017)e1601314.

[108] H. Lee, T.K. Choi, Y.B. Lee, H.R. Cho, R. Ghaffari, L. Wang, H.J. Choi, T.D. Chung, N.S.Lu, T. Hyeon, S.H. Choi, D.H. Kim, A graphene-based electrochemical device withthermoresponsive microneedles for diabetes monitoring and therapy, Nat.Nanotechnol. 11 (6) (2016) 566.

[109] M. Bariya, H.Y.Y. Nyein, A. Javey, Wearable sweat sensors, Nat. Electr. 1 (3) (2018)160–171.

[110] Q. Shao, G. Liu, D. Teweldebrhan, A.A. Balandin, High-temperature quenching ofelectrical resistance in graphene interconnects, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 (20) (2008).

[111] S.C. Barman, M.F. Hossain, J.Y. Park, Gold nanoparticles assembled chemically func-tionalized reduced Graphene oxide supported electrochemical Immunosensor forultra-sensitive prostate Cancer detection, J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 (6) (2017)B234–B239.

[112] L. Shi, Y. Wang, S.M. Ding, Z.Y. Chu, Y. Yin, D.F. Jiang, J.Y. Luo, W.Q. Jin, A facile andgreen strategy for preparing newly-designed 3D graphene/gold film and its appli-cation in highly efficient electrochemical mercury assay, Biosens. Bioelectron. 89(2017) 871–879.

[113] J. Matsui, M. Takayose, K. Akamatsu, H. Nawafune, K. Tamaki, N. Sugimoto, Molec-ularly imprinted nanocomposites for highly sensitive SPR detection of a non-aqueous atrazine sample, Analyst 134 (1) (2009) 80–86.

[114] T. Kuila, S. Bose, P. Khanra, A.K. Mishra, N.H. Kim, J.H. Lee, Recent advances ingraphene-based biosensors, Biosens. Bioelectron. 26 (12) (2011) 4637–4648.

[115] A. Riul, A.M.G. Soto, S.V. Mello, S. Bone, D.M. Taylor, L.H.C. Mattoso, An electronictongue using polypyrrole and polyaniline, Synth. Met. 132 (2) (2003) 109–116.

[116] A. Riul, R.R. Malmegrim, F.J. Fonseca, L.H.C. Mattoso, An artificial taste sensor basedon conducting polymers, Biosens. Bioelectron. 18 (11) (2003) 1365–1369.

[117] A. Bossi, S.A. Piletsky, E.V. Piletska, P.G. Righetti, A.P.F. Turner, An assay for ascorbicacid based on polyaniline-coated microplates, Anal. Chem. 72 (18) (2000)4296–4300.

[118] K. Pallav, I. Saxena, K.F. Ehmann, Laser-induced plasma micromachining process:principles and performance, J. Micro Nano-Manufact. 3 (3) (2015).

[119] Y.Q. Xing, K.D. Zhang, P. Huang, L. Liu, Z. Wu, Assessment machining of micro-channel textures on PCD by laser-induced plasma and ultra-short pulsed laser ab-lation, Opt. Laser Technol. 125 (2020).


Recommended