•1
September 8, 2016September 8, 2016
Post Construction StormwaterControls in Mecklenburg County,
NC: Past, Present (and Future)
Post Construction StormwaterControls in Mecklenburg County,
NC: Past, Present (and Future)
Mike MacIntyre, PE
Don Ceccarelli, PE, CFM
Mike MacIntyre, PE
Don Ceccarelli, PE, CFM
Presented to:
South Carolina Association of Storm Water Managers
Presented to:
South Carolina Association of Storm Water Managers
MM3
Driver #1-Flooding
• An inch of rainfall on an acre of woods in typical piedmont soilsproduces no runoff.
• The same one inch of rainfall on one acre of asphalt will produceover 27,000 gallons of runoff.
Driver #2 – Channel ErosionDriver #2 – Channel Erosion
•2
Driver #2 – Channel Erosion
Driver #2 – Channel Erosion
November 1969: Local Water QualityProgram Established “for the abatement
of pollution of the streams and theirtributaries in Mecklenburg County.”
Charlotte News’Articles fromSeptember 1969
Driver #3 – Pollution
•3
…of waterpollution in
MecklenburgCounty.
Storm waterrunoff is the
biggest source…
Visible storm water pollutants runningdown College Street in Charlotte.
Driver #3 – Pollution
In the beginning ……..
1. Detention Ordinance(s) – BMPs required forcommercial / industrial developments ~ 1979
2. Watershed Ordinance(s) – BMPs required for certaindevelopment and re-development projects inWatershed Overlay districts ~ 1993
3. State 401 Water Quality Certification Conditions
4. SWIM Mitigation Conditions ~ 1998
5. Rezoning Conditions
6. Post-Construction – BMPs required for certaindevelopment and re-development projects ~ 2007
1. Detention Ordinance(s) – BMPs required forcommercial / industrial developments ~ 1979
2. Watershed Ordinance(s) – BMPs required for certaindevelopment and re-development projects inWatershed Overlay districts ~ 1993
3. State 401 Water Quality Certification Conditions
4. SWIM Mitigation Conditions ~ 1998
5. Rezoning Conditions
6. Post-Construction – BMPs required for certaindevelopment and re-development projects ~ 2007
When was Storm Water Treatment Required?When was Storm Water Treatment Required?
•4
N
GOOSE CREEK
WESTERN CATAWBAYADKIN-SOUTHEAST CATAWBA
HUNTERSVILLE
CENTRAL CATAWBA
LONG
McALPINE
SUGAR
IRWINPAW
MALLARD
BRIAR
McDOWELL
CLARKE
CLEAR
REEDY
STEELE
GAR
FOUR MILE
GOOSE
SIX MILE
LAKENORMAN
BACK
McMULLEN
ROCKYRIVER
UPPERLITTLESUGAR
McKEE
BEAVERDAM
CLEM
LOWERLITTLESUGAR
LOWERCLARKE
LOWERMTN
ISLAND
CROOKED
CATAWBA
UPPERMTN
ISLAND
CALDWELL
TWELVE MILE
LAKEWYLIE
5 0 5 10 Miles
Requirements for Post-Construction OrdinanceWatershed Districts
Western Catawba District
BMPs >12% BUA @ 85%TSS & 70%TPremoval
* >24% in Cornelius
Buffers Same as CentralCatawba District
Detention Same as CentralCatawba District
OpenSpace
Same as CentralCatawba District
Yadkin District
BMPs >10% BUA @ 85% TSS& 70%TP removal
* >12% in Mint Hill
Buffers <50 ac.= 50 ft.;
>50 ac. = 100 ft
Detention Same as CentralCatawba District
OpenSpace
Same as CentralCatawba District
Central Catawba District
BMPs >24% BUA @ 85% TSSremoval
Buffers S.W.I.M. + 30 ft on int.streams
Detention V = post 1-yr, 24-hrstorm;
P = 10-yr & 25-yr, 6-hr
OpenSpace
<24% BUA = 25%;
>24% BUA = 17.5%;
>50 BUA = 10%
Goose Creek District
BMPs Any BUA @ 85% TSS(pre-post, 1-yr, 24-hr)
Buffers S.W.I.M +
100-ft on streams;
200-ft on streamsw/floodplain
Detention V = pre–post 1-yr, 24-hrP = 10-yr & 25-yr, 6-hr
OpenSpace
<20% BUA = 0%;
>20% BUA = 15%;
>50 BUA = 10%
Exceeds current State requirements
Huntersville
BMPs >12% BUA @ 85% TSS& LID BMPs
* >6% in MI Critical Area
Buffers Same as CentralCatawba District
Detention V = pre–post 1-yr, or 2-yr24-hr based on zoning
P (> 12% BUA) = 2-yr &10-yr, 24-hr
Open Space None
1. Installation
2. Platted Easement
3. As-Built Survey
4. Maintained
5. Recorded Maintenance Plans
6. Annual Inspections
7. Reporting
8. Maintenance & Replacement Funding
1. Installation
2. Platted Easement
3. As-Built Survey
4. Maintained
5. Recorded Maintenance Plans
6. Annual Inspections
7. Reporting
8. Maintenance & Replacement Funding
Evolution of BMP RequirementsEvolution of BMP Requirements
1979
2015
1979
2015
Detention
Reduce the flowrate of storm water runoff.
•5
•Wet Pond
•Structural Best Management Practices(BMPs)
•Flowrate control, TSS removal via settling.
Wetland
•Structural Best Management Practices(BMPs)
Flowrate control, TSS removal via settling, nutrientremoval via biological uptake
Rain Garden
•Structural Best Management Practices(BMPs)
TSS removal via settling and filtration, nutrientremoval via biological & microbial uptake, &
volume reduction
•6
Filter pollutants, reduce run-offthrough evapo-transpiration and
absorption, and reduceimpervious area.
Open Space - Trees
Chapter 4 – Structural Storm Water Controls
• 4.1 Bioretention
• 4.2 Wet Pond
• 4.3 Storm Water Wetlands
• 4.4 Enhanced Grassed Swale
• 4.5 Grass Channels
• 4.6 Infiltration Trench
• 4.7 Filter Strip/Wooded Buffer Strip
• 4.8 Sand Filters
• 4.9 Extended Dry Detention
• 4.10 Proprietary & Innovative BMPs
• Green Roofs and Permeable PavementSystems added as innovative BMPs inSeptember 2008
• Designs reference State BMP Manual
• Lists Key Performance Criteria
Chapter 4.10 Proprietary and Innovative BMPsChapter 4.10 Proprietary and Innovative BMPs
•7
• Peak Attenuation - Reduction via routing
• Volume Capture - Reduction via routing and viaon-site infiltration rates / voids storage
• Water Quality Pollutant Removal- up to 85% forTotal Suspended Solids (TSS) and 60% TotalPhosphorus (TP)
• Built-Upon Area Credit – 50 to 75% built-uponarea reduction depending on soil whencomparing to low density / high densityrequirements; no credit for Watershed built-upon area maximums.
Permeable Pavement PerformanceCriteria
Permeable Pavement PerformanceCriteria
• Assist in meeting storm water controlrequirements of various ordinances
• Provide reduction in the size of downstreamstorm water control measures
• Provide some reduction in total storm water run-off volume which can reduce the potential forstream bank erosion and sediment loading tostreams and lakes.
• Can assist in groundwater recharge
Storm Water Management Benefits ofPermeable Pavements
Storm Water Management Benefits ofPermeable Pavements
Future BMP SophisticationFuture BMP Sophistication
Continued development of Manufactureddevices “leaning towards” water treatmenttechnologies… cartridge filters, membranetechnology, etc.
Focus on volume reduction through:
o Infiltration
o Reuse – irrigation and grey water usage
•8
Examples of Green Building PracticesExamples of Green Building Practices
8 ft+
MM4
Key Terms
• Development
– Land-disturbing activity that creates imperviousarea or that otherwise decreases the infiltrationof precipitation into the soil
• Redevelopment
– Land-disturbing activity that does not result in anet increase in impervious area and thatprovides greater or equal stormwater controlthan the previous development
Building Addition
Development Example
ExistingBuilding
•9
New BuildingExisting Building
Redevelopment Example
Key Terms
• Detention
– Peak Control (flood relief)
• The controlled release of the runoff from 10-,25-, and possibly larger 6-hour storms toprevent flooding of downstream structuresand properties
– Volume Control (stream erosion prevention)
• The slower, controlled release of the runofffrom a 1-year, 24-hour storm in order toprotect streambanks from being eroded
Redevelopment CaseStudy
Seven Eleven –N Wendover Rd
•10
Pre-Project Conditions (2011)
28
Redevelopment Conditions (2015)
29
Site Constraints
30
• Side/Rear Yards andSetbacks required byZoning Ordinance
• Tree Save Areas requiredby Tree Ordinance
• Internal Tree plantingrequired by TreeOrdinance
• Underground StormwaterControl Measure (SCM)required by Post-Construction StormwaterOrdinance (PCSO)
Tree Save Area
•11
Redeveloped Site Specifics
31
Pre-Project (acres) Redevelopment (acres)
Tree Save 0 0.24
AdditionalVegetated Area
0.60 0.07
Total PerviousArea
0.60 0.31
Impervious Area 0.47 0.76
Site Area 1.07 1.07
How Redevelopment Improves theWatershed
32
RedevelopmentRequirements:• Detention is
provided to slowlyrelease runoff toreduce streamerosion
• Detention isprovided on-site toreduce downstreamstorm drainagesystem burden
• Detention isprovided on-site toreduce downstreamstreet flooding
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Stream Erosion FlowStorm Drainage
System Flow Street Flooding Flow
Stream Protection and Flood Reduction
Pre-Project Redevelopment
How Redevelopment Improves theWatershed
33
Undeveloped
Pre-Project
Redevelopment
Hydrograph for Stream Erosion Flow
•12
How Redevelopment Improves theWatershed
34
Undeveloped
Pre-Project
Redevelopment
Hydrograph for Storm Drainage System Flow
Site Discussion
35
Tree Save Area
Redevelopment CaseStudy
Hendrick Autohaus
•13
Pre-Project Conditions (2011)
37
Redevelopment Conditions (2015)
38
Aerial Comparison
2013 Aerial 2014 Aerial
39
•14
Downstream Analysis
40
Open Channel
Stormwater Pipe
Downstream Analysis – 10%Point
41
Open Channel
Stormwater Pipe
Setback
Setback
Tree Planting Area
Tree Save Area
Site Layout
42
• Setbacks required byZoning Ordinance
• Tree Save Areas requiredby Tree Ordinance
• Internal Tree plantingrequired by TreeOrdinance
• Underground StormwaterControl Measure (SCM)required by Post-Construction StormwaterOrdinance (PCSO)
Un
de
rgro
un
dSC
M
Building Footprint
•15
Redeveloped Site Specifics
43
Pre-Project (acres) Redevelopment (acres)
Tree Save 0 0.25*
AdditionalVegetated Area
0 0.45
Total PerviousArea
0 0.70
Impervious Area 5.37 4.67
Site Area 5.37 5.37
*This site utilized the payment-in-lieu option in the Tree Ordinance and paid a fee of $76,495.50for compliance in addition to the onsite plantings.
Stormwater Development Requirements
• Provide onsite detention to reduce downstreamerosion and flooding impacts. This wasaccomplished by installing an undergrounddetention system.
• Pay mitigation fee for water quality impact at rate of$60,000 per acre of Built Upon Area (BUA). This sitepaid $280,000.
44
How Redevelopment Improves theWatershed
45
RedevelopmentRequirements:• Detention is
provided to slowlyrelease runoff toreduce streamerosion
• Detention isprovided on-site toreduce downstreamstorm drainagesystem burden
• Detention isprovided on-site toreduce downstreamstreet flooding
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Stream Erosion FlowStorm Drainage
System Flow Street Flooding Flow
Stream Protection and Flood Reduction
Pre-Project Redevelopment
•16
How Redevelopment Improves theWatershed
46
Undeveloped
Pre-Project
Redevelopment
Hydrograph for Stream Erosion Flow
How Redevelopment Improves theWatershed
47
Undeveloped
Pre-Project
Redevelopment
Hydrograph for Storm Drainage System Flow
Setback
Setback
Tree Planting Area
Tree Save Area
Site Discussion
48
Un
de
rgro
un
dSC
M
Building Footprint
MM1
Slide 48
MM1 Need explanation of all of the green space and why it is requiredMacIntyre, Mike, 12/29/2014
•17
Redevelopment CaseStudy
CarnegieApartments/Capitol Towers
Pre-Project Conditions (2009)
50
Aerial Comparison
2013 Aerial Rezoning
51
•18
How Redevelopment Improves theWatershed
52
DevelopmentRequirements:• Detention is
provided to slowlyreleased to reducestream erosion
• Detention isprovided on-site toreduce downstreamstorm drainagesystem burden
• Detention isprovided on-site toreduce downstreamstreet flooding
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Stream Erosion FlowStorm Drainage
System Flow Street Flooding Flow
Stream Protection and Flood Reduction
Pre-Project Development
Little Sugar Creek Greenway
and Stream Restoration
Mike MacIntyre, PE
Don Ceccarelli, PE, CFM
Mike MacIntyre, PE
Don Ceccarelli, PE, CFM
QuestionsQuestions