Date post: | 10-May-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | icrossing |
View: | 5,412 times |
Download: | 0 times |
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
Screw Brand Equity,Connected Brands Rule.or....how i learned to stop hating and love the network
Adam LavelleChief Strategy Officer, iCrossing
1) Don welcomes the group (SEE TALKING POINTS)2) Introduces Adam
we consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of mediawe consume a lot of media
© ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 5
we live in networks
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 6
Source: Forrester
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 7
Source: Forrester
© ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 8
How will brands behave?
Brands have to live, not just talk.
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 10
SEOSEM Displayads SMS Mobile
display
Landingpages
Website
OnsiteUGC
Yourblogs
Website(mobile)
Digitalout ofhome
Kiosks
Gaming
Otherblogs
Wordof
mouth
GadgetsWidgetsRSS
Digitalvideo
TVads
Radioads
Printads
PR
Pointof
sale
Directmail
OOH
Callcenter
mapping something
checkingin
buying
researching
updatingstatus
saying/sharing
watchingor listening
consuming other’s
opinions
looking for help with
something
connectedness
December 2004, Facebook reaches nearly 1 million active users
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 12
What is connectedness?
It’s a way of thinking about how brands can live in a networked world:
• focusing on audiences not targets
• engaging in dialogue not shouting
• developing trust that lasts
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 13
AWARE
AGILE
ACTIVE
Building a connected brand
Useful DesirableVisible Usable Engaged
SEO
SEM
DISPLAY
CONTENT
FUNCTIONALITY
COMMUNITY
TRANSPARENCY
LISTENING
OUTREACH
BRAND EXPERIENCE
OFFER
WAYFINDING
INTERFACES
INTERACTIONDESIGN
the Connected Brands Index(some actual data)
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 15
• The methodology used by iCrossing to evaluate brand Connectedness is aligned with the Visible, Useful, Usable, Desirable, and Engaged framework
• The methodology evaluates each brand using core metrics defined by iCrossing to evaluate competencies related to Connectedness and each brand is given a score for each of the Connectedness framework elements as well as overall
Connected Brands Index
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 16
Visibility (Offsite)• Official Flickr Account• Official YouTube Channel• Official Facebook Group• Official Twitter Group• Company Blog
Visibility (Onsite)• # of Unique Visitors• # of Referring URLs• Overall Reach• # of Inbound Links
Connected Brands Index – sample metrics
Useful• Does the landing page(s) provide evidence that
user goals can be completed? • Is essential content available where needed? • Is essential function available where needed?
Usable• Are menu category and subcategory names
clear and mutually exclusive? • Do menu categories immediately expose or
describe their subcategories? • Are content and function classified logically?
Desirable• Does the site’s content support brand
positioning in a manner that is consistent with other channels?
• Does the site’s functionality support brand positioning in a manner that is consistent with other channels?
• Do the site’s language and tone support brand positioning in a manner that is consistent with other channels?
Engagement (Advocacy)• Number of YouTube Friends• Number of Tweets about the Brand• # of Shared/Recommended Content
Links on Reddit.comm• # of Shared/Recommended Content
Links on Digg.com• # of Social Bookmarks on Del.ic.ious
Engagement (Actions)• Visits Per Person• Average Stay• PageViews/Visit• # of Flickr Contacs• # of Flick Discussions• # of Flickr Posted Items• # of Flickr Photo Search Results• # of YouTube Subscribers• # of YouTube Channel Views• # of Facebook Fans/Friends• # of Facebook Discussions• # of Official Twitter Acounts• # of Tweets per Day (Average of all
Accounts)• # of Twitter Followers / Following
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 17
The Connected Brands Index
Interbrand’s Best Global Brands, 2009 Rankings
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 18
Connected Brands Index - ResultsC
onne
cted
Bra
nd In
dex
Sco
re
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 19
Visible Score
• Average score was 5.47• Six of 10 scored above 5• Nokia’s best score
The Visible category quantifies the presence a brand has in the digital world.
Visibility metrics include a range of data points related to both the official company presence (.com), as well as the brand’s presence in search engines, social media sites, blogs and other places in the network. We also measured the number of referring URLs, overall reach, and inbound links and total visits to the corporate landing page. As we see below, Google once again leads the others, which is understandable given the reach of Google.com. Six of the 10 scored above a 5, with the average score being 5.47. Visible was the category in which Nokia had their best score.
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 20
Useful Score• Average score was 4.85• Three of 10 scored below
their average score• Coca-cola’s highest scoring
category
iCrossing modified and applied the Forrester Research Web Site Review methodology to score each brand’s Website for the Useful, Usable and Desirable categories. For each brand, iCrossing developed a persona of a typical user and a specific goal that user may want to accomplish at the brand’s Web site. For the Useful category, iCrossing analysts looked at how well each site scored against a set of 10 questions including “Does the landing page(s) provide evidence that user goals can be completed?” and “Is essential function available where needed?” All 10 criteria used to judge the Useful category can be found in the methodology section. Useful was the second worst performing category for the brands as a whole, with an average score of 4.85. Three out of the 10 scored below their average scores. Coca-Cola was helped most with their Useful score of 5.85. It was their highest-scoring category.
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 21
Usable Score• Average score was 5.92• Highest scoring category
overall• Best category score for IBM,
GE, and Toyota
The Usable category quantifies how well a user can navigate and find relevant content on the site. iCrossing analysts looked at how well each site, from a user perspective, scored against a set of ten questions including “Are content and function classified logically?” All 10 criteria used to judge the Usable category can be found in the methodology section. With the exception of Microsoft, all of the brand’s usable scores exceeded their average total Connected Brand Index scores. It was the highest scoring category for IBM, GE, and Toyota. It was also the highest scoring category overall, with an average score of 5.92 for all brands.
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 22
Desirable Score• Average score was 5.77• All brands scored higher than
their overall score except Nokia
• Top category for Google, Disney, Intel, and Microsoft
The desirable score quantifies how well the Web site reflects brand positioning compared with other channels, the emotional impact of the site, and whether the site gives a user a reason to return. The 12 criteria used to score each site can be found in the Methodology section. Desirable was the second best scoring category overall and the top category for Google, Disney, Intel, and Microsoft. Nokia was the only brand to score below its overall score on Desirable, with a score of 2.92.
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 23
Engagement Score• Average score was 2.11• Lowest scoring category
overall• McDonald’s had the lowest
Engagement score• Google’s score is more than
twice the next competitor
Engagement metrics were split into two categories of publically-available data points. These categories were Advocacy – used to determine how willing users are to promote the brand – and Actions – a measure of how well the company uses offsite visibility to communicate with consumers. Twenty metrics were measured in total, including numbers of subscribers on social media sites such as Facebook and Youtube, Twitter activity and social bookmarks. Complete Engagement metrics can be found in the Methodology section. Engagement was the poorest performing category for every brand. Even for Google, whose score of 6.53 is more than twice that of the next highest scoring brand, Microsoft. On average, the brands only scored a 2.11 on a scale of 1-10 with McDonald’s having the lowest Engaged score of 0.71.
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 24
Overall Results
Get the data: www.icrossing.com/research/
Find me: - @alavelle - [email protected] - www.adamlavelle.com
Switching gears…
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 27
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 28
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 29
1 millionactive users in 2004
December 2004, Facebook reaches nearly 1 million active users
400 millionactive users in 2010
More than 400 million active users
100 millionmobile users
There are more than 100 million active users currently accessing Facebook through their mobile devices.
2xmore active on mobile devices
People that use Facebook on their mobile devices are twice more active on Facebook than non-mobile users.
70%users are from outside the U.S.
About 70% of Facebook users are outside the United States
average user has130 fiends
Average user has 130 friends on the site
55 minaverage user time spent/per day
Average user spends more than 55 minutes per day on Facebook
60+ millionstatus updates each day
More than 60 million status updates posted each day
3.5 millionevents created each month
More than 5 billion pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photo albums, etc.) shared each week
3 billion photos uploaded each month
More than 3 billion photos uploaded to the site each month
5 billionpieces of content shared each week
More than 5 billion pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photo albums, etc.) shared each week
80,000 siteshave implemented FB Connect
More than 5 billion pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photo albums, etc.) shared each week
20+ millionbecome a fan of pages each day
More than 5 billion pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photo albums, etc.) shared each week
5.3 billiontotal fans
More than 5 billion pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photo albums, etc.) shared each week
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 46
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 47
Twitter volume
Month
Week
Day
Hour
Minute
1,500,000,000
346,420,323
49,488,618
2,062,026
34,367
foursquare
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 49
Brands that have inked deals with Foursquare
• Pepsi• Tasti D-Lite• Metro News• Bravo TV• HBO• Warner Bros.• Zagat• History Channel
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 50
“the real goal for us is to get tourists away from the usual heavily-trafficked areas and out into the real heart of the city—its diverse neighborhoods. Plus we can analyze data from users on Foursquare to see exactly what badges are most popular, what venues see the most action, and how far travelers are venturing into the city because of it.”
- Dorothy Coyle, Director of the Chicago Office of Tourism
COPYRIGHT ICROSSING / PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 51
Foursquare volume
Month
Week
Day
Hour
Minute
5,196,000
1,200,000
171,429
7,143
119