+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Date post: 11-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: yuliana-wimmer
View: 226 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
70
Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks
Transcript
Page 1: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Syracuse UniversityJune, 2010

Firearms and Toolmarks

Page 2: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Forensic Firearm Analysis

WALLIE HOWARD JR.

CENTER FOR FORENSIC SCIENCES

Matthew Kurimsky

Firearms Examiner

Page 3: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

FORENSIC FIREARMS IDENTIFICATION

• A scientific process of determining whether a bullet or cartridge case was fired from a particular weapon. This is done by examining and evaluating the class and individual characteristics imparted onto the bullet or cartridge case.

Page 4: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

FIREARMS SECTION

• FIREARM IDENTIFICATION• OPERABILITY ANALYSIS• FIREARM COMPARISONS• PHYSICAL MATCH COMPARISONS• IBIS ENTRIES• SERIAL NUMBER RESTORATION• GUNSHOT RESIDUE DISTANCE

DETERMINATION

Page 5: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

FIREARMS IDENTIFICATION

• Can determine the general condition of a firearm and whether the firearm is mechanically functional.

• Can determine whether the firearm was altered to fire in full-automatic mode.

• Can be test fired to obtain known specimens for comparison to evidence ammunition components.

Page 6: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

HOMEMADE

Page 7: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.
Page 8: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

CLASS CHARACTERISTICS

• Are measurable features of a specimen that indicate a restricted group source.

• Result from design factors, and are determined prior to manufacture.

• Examples are firing pin shape, caliber, and general rifling characteristics.

Page 9: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.
Page 10: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

BREECH FACE

Breech face of a firearm.

Arch breech face marks.

Page 11: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

RIFLING

• Helical grooves in the bore of a firearm barrel to impart rotary motion to a projectile.

Page 12: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Rifling

Page 13: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

COMMON TYPES OF RIFLING

• BROACH RIFLING:

Cuts the grooves by being pushed or pulled through the barrel while being rotated.

• BUTTON RIFLING: Pushed or pulled through a drilled and reamed barrel so as to cold form the spiral grooves to the desired depth and twist. NOT a cutting process.

Page 14: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

GENERAL RIFLING CHARACTERISTICS

• The number, width and direction of twist of the rifling grooves in a barrel of a given caliber firearm.

Page 15: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS

• Marks produced by the random imperfections or irregularities of tool surfaces.

• These random imperfections or irregularities are produced incidental to manufacture and/or caused by use, corrosion, or damage.

• They are unique to that tool and distinguish it from all other tools.

Page 16: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

COMPARISON MICROSCOPE

• Optically bridged so objects can be viewed side by side.

Page 17: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

CARTRIDGE CASE OR SHOTSHELL EXAMINATION

• Cartridge case examination can determine the caliber or gauge, and the manufacturer.

• The images of questioned cartridge cases can be entered into IBIS to compare with evidence from other shooting incidents.

• The microscopic characteristics of evidence cartridge cases can be examined to determine whether they were fired in a specific firearm.

Page 18: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

CARTRIDGE CASING IDENTIFICATION

Parallel breech face marks.

Page 19: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Granular breech face marks.

Circular breech face marks.

Page 20: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

FIRING PIN

Firing pin impression.

Firing pin drag mark.

Page 21: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

OTHER MARKS

Ejector marks. Extractor marks.

Page 22: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

BULLET EXAMINATIONS

• Bullets can be examined to determine the general rifling characteristics.

• The microscopic characteristics on evidence bullets can be compared to test-fired bullets from a suspect firearm to determine whether the evidence bullet was fired from that firearm.

Page 23: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

SHOOTING TANK

Page 24: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Bullet comparisons

The gun barrel is produced from a solid bar of steel that has been hollowed out by drilling

The microscopic drill marks left on the barrel inner surface are randomly irregular and would in themselves serve to impart a uniqueness to each barrel.Manufacturers make the inner surface of the barrel with spiral groves, a step known as rifling

Page 25: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Bullet comparisons

Why rifling in a barrel?

Prevents the bullet from tumbling when it leaves the barrel, more accuracy.

Page 26: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Bullet comparisons

Caliber - the diameter of the bore of a rifled firearm.

The diameter of the gun barrel is measured between opposite lands, this is known as the caliber of the weapon. It is usually expressed in hundredths of an inch (.22) or millimeters (9mm)

Page 27: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Bullet comparisons

Every firearms manufacturer chooses a rifling process that is best suited to meet the production standards and requirements of its product.

Once the choice is made, the class characteristics of the weapons barrel will remain consistent; each will have the same number of lands and grooves, the same approximate width and directions of twist.

Page 28: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Bullet comparisons

Ex:

.32 caliber Smith & Wesson revolvers have five lands and grooves twisting to the right

Ex:

.32 caliber Colt revolvers exhibit six lands and grooves twisting to the left

Page 29: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Bullet comparisons

There are fine lines or striations, many running the length of the barrel’s lands and grooves.

These are caused by minute imperfections found on the rifling cutter’s surface or they are produced by minute chips of steel pushed against the barrel’s inner surface.

The fact is that the random distribution and irregularities of these markings are impossible to duplicate exactly in any two barrels.

Page 30: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Bullet comparisons

No two rifled barrels, even those manufactured in succession, will have identical striation markings!

These striations form the individual characteristics of the barrel.

The number of lands and grooves, and their direction of twist are obvious points of comparison during initial stages of the examination

Page 31: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Bullet comparisons

By comparing the lands and grooves and directions of twist, we can eliminate certain weapons.

The most important tool for the firearms examiner is the comparison microscope.

Page 32: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

COMARISON MICROSCOPECOMARISON MICROSCOPE

Page 33: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Bullet comparisonsThe striations of the bullet are lined up and compared

Page 34: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.
Page 35: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

BULLET IDENTIFICATION

Page 36: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Bullet comparisonsWith shotguns, most barrels are smooth

The diameter of the shotgun barrel is expressed by the term gauge

Gauge - the number of lead balls with the same diameter as the barrel that would make a pound

ex: 20 ga = diameter of lead ball weighing

1/20th of a pound

Exception to this is 410 gauge, actually is .410 inch diameter

Page 37: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

PHYSICAL MATCH COMPARISON

• Physical match comparison can determine whether evidence was joined together and subsequently broken apart.

Page 38: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Projectile jacket separation.

Copper jacket fragment.

Page 39: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

MATCH

Fragment match. Stria match.

Page 40: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

INTEGRATED BALLISTICS IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (IBIS)

• Images of projectiles and cartridge casings recovered from the crime scene, or produced from evidence weapons are entered into the database and searched.

• Used to link multiple crimes to a single weapon.

Page 41: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

• Potential hits are compared to one another by a firearms examiner on a comparison microscope.

• Hits are NOT made by simply looking at the images in IBIS.

Page 42: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

SHOT PELLETS, BUCK SHOT, OR SLUGS

• Examination of shot pellets, buck shot, or slugs can determine the size of the shot or the gauge of the slug, and the manufacturer.

Page 43: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

SHOTSHELL COMPONENTS

Page 44: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

00 BUCK

Page 45: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

WADDING EXAMINATIONS

• Examinations of wadding components can determine the gauge and the manufacturer.

Page 46: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

UNFIRED CARTRIDGES OR SHOTSHELLS

• Examinations of unfired cartridges or shotshells can determine the caliber or gauge and whether there are marks of value for comparison.

• Examinations can also determine whether the ammunition was loaded into and extracted from a specific firearm.

• Unfired and fired cartridges or shotshells can be associated through manufacturing marks.

Page 47: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

SERIAL NUMBER RESTORATIONS

• Obliterated and/or altered firearm serial numbers can sometimes be restored.

• Chemical, electrolytic, and magnetic particle inspection are some of the methods used.

Page 48: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Before restoration. After restoration.

Page 49: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.
Page 50: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.
Page 51: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.
Page 52: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

FIRING RANGE

Page 53: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

The accuracy of a distance determination The accuracy of a distance determination varies according to the circumstances of the varies according to the circumstances of the casecase

Gunpowder residues

Because the spread and density of the Because the spread and density of the residue pattern will vary widely between residue pattern will vary widely between weapons and ammunition.weapons and ammunition.

Page 54: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Gunpowder residues

A COMPARISON IS SIGNIFICANT ONLY WHEN IT IS MADE WITH THE SUSPECT WEAPON AND AMMUNITION OR AMMUNITION OF THE SAME MAKE AND TYPE

Page 55: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Contact Pattern Shotgun

Page 56: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Gunpowder residues

Items that influence estimating target distance (amt. Of gunpowder residue)

Barrel lengthCalibertype of ammunitionType and condition of the weapon fired

Page 57: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Gunpowder residues

Tests done on garments in the lab

Examine microscopically for presenceof gunpowder residue

Nitrite test - greis testSodium rhodizoante test (lead)

Greis test - a chemical test to develop patterns ofgun powder residues around bullet holes

Page 58: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Victims Clothing

Page 59: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

3 inch Test Pattern

Page 60: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

DISTANCE DETERMINATION

Page 61: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

SODIUM RHODIZONATE TEST

• Tests for the presence of lead.

• Converts lead to lead rhodizonate.

Page 62: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

GRIESS TEST

• Tests for the presence of nitrites.

• Converts nitrites to nitrates.

Page 63: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

PRIMER RESIDUE ON HANDSPRIMER RESIDUE ON HANDS

Page 64: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

GSR

During the firing process. GSR particle.

Page 65: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

ToolmarksDefined as any impression, cut, gouge, or abrasioncaused by a tool coming into contact with anotherobject

USUALLY THERE WILL BE CLASS CHARACTERISTICS

SIZE

SHAPE

Page 66: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Toolmarks

Sometimes nicks and wear patterns will individualize a tool

INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS ARE HARD TO IDENTIFY BECAUSE OF

THE DIFFICULTY OF DUPLICATING THE TOOL MARK IN THE LAB

Page 67: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Toolmarks

Page 68: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Toolmarks

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCEUNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE

MUST THE CRIME SCENE MUST THE CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATOR ATTEMPT TO FIT INVESTIGATOR ATTEMPT TO FIT

THE SUSPECT TOOL INTO THE THE SUSPECT TOOL INTO THE TOOL MARKTOOL MARK

Page 69: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

Toolmarks

BEAR IN MIND THAT THE TOOL BEAR IN MIND THAT THE TOOL OR IMPRESSION MAY CONTAIN OR IMPRESSION MAY CONTAIN VALUABLE TRACE EVIDENCEVALUABLE TRACE EVIDENCE

Page 70: Syracuse University June, 2010 Firearms and Toolmarks.

QUESTIONS?

Matthew Kurimsky – Firearms Examiner

[email protected]

315-435-3800 firearms unit


Recommended